ML15252A443

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:11, 5 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NYS000566 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey
ML15252A443
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2015
From:
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28270, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15252A443 (1)


Text

NYS000566 Submitted: September 9, 2015 FIGURE 1 BEe (1)

(3) (2) 1.0

+

BEne Limit Line (LL)

CUFen Best Estimate (BE) 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2)

EOL (PEO) TIME Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne).

Note:

(1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL).

(2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.

(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.