ML19329F400

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:54, 6 January 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interrogatories Directed to Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group,Citizens' Committee for Environ Portection of Mi, Sierra Club & United Auto Workers,Et Al.Requests Info Re Issues & Background of 701112 Petition to Intervene
ML19329F400
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 01/07/1971
From: Rich Smith
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.), LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS, AXELRAD & TOLL, SMITH & BROOKER
To:
Saginaw Intervenor, Sierra Club
Shared Package
ML19329F398 List:
References
NUDOCS 8006270449
Download: ML19329F400 (24)


Text

iur

.

)

____:

{^_.y)

__ .

-

.

-

Q r -

'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION In the Matter of )

-

) Docket No. 50-329  ;

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-330 ,

l

. )

!

(Midland Plant) )

INTERROGATORIES TO SAGINAW VALLEY NUCLEAR STUDY GROUP, CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF MICHIGAN,

,

SIERRA CLUB, UNITED AUTO WORKERS OF AMERICA, TROUT UNLIMITED, WEST MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COUNCIL, INC., ENVIRONMENTAL LAW SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW STUDENTS Please take notice that Consumers Power Company (hereinafter

'

referred to as " Applicant"), hereby demands that Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, Citizens Committee for the Environmental Protection of Michigan, Sierra Club, United Auto Workers of America, Trout Unlimited, West Michigan Environmental Action Council, Inc., Environmental Law Society of the University of Michigan Law Students (sometimes referred to as University of Michigan Environ-mental Law Society) answer under oath, by January 21, 1971, the written interrogatories set forth below. .

As used in these interrogatories, the terms " document" and

" writing" and variants thereof include each

. book, record, memorandum, item of correspondence, minute, report, ,

study, analysis, stenographic transcript, code, criterion, statute, regulation, graph, chart, transcription, drawing, and other

.

.

.

e

! -

8006270 -

.

K -- - -. .

.

~

.. -

(~) ,,_ e ,

.

.

'

writing of any kind; the requirement that a document or writing be identified means that the identification should be in a manner suitable for use in a subpoena and should include speci-fication of the nature of the document or writing and the date, author or sender, addressee (if any) or recipient, distributees, and title (if'any) thereof; the requirement to state, describe,

idex.cify, set forch, relate or specify means to do so completely, with full particularity, and in all details. .

With respect to each of these interrogatories, if you do not have knowledge or information sufficient to provide a complete answer, you should so state and answer the interrogatory as fully as your knowledge and information allow.

1. With respect to each concern, contention and allegation

,

in paragraph 22 of your Petition to Intervene dated November 12,

,

1970 (hereinafter "your petition") ,

,

(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by

'

whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person !.nvolved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to

.

each person.

2. Set forth each and every respect in which the location of the Midland reactors violates the guidelines set forth in TID 14844, 10 C.F.R. Part 100 and a detailed statement explaining the basis for each such asserted violation. -

-

- -

_ _ _

n_ ._ _ ,_ __

-

,

f

. .

p -

r

.

3. Describe the alleged "' synergistic and counter-productive 4 effects of various systems used to control the release of iodine",

referred to in paragraph 23(d) of your petition and explain in detail the basis for your belief that such effects would occur.

4. Set forth in detail the alleged problems (referred to in paragraph 23 (e) of your petition) "that would be encountered if both Midland reactors were to ha've simultaneous maximum hypo-thetical accidents" and explain in detail the basis for your belief that such problems would be encountered. _

_

5. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 23 of your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such. document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) cf each person involved therein, and

.

the complete substance of what was said by and to each person. .

'

6. In explanation of paragraph 24 of your petition,

, , (a) Identify the " critical safety related systems"

  • referred to in said paragraph.

(b) State each and every respect in which the PSAR is incomplete and inadequate.

.

.

e

.g -

. -r,,- .- , e

. - _ .

,

-

__ _; . _ .: . __ ._ . ._;

.

.

_ .

'

-

(~) 4

. .

.

. .,

(c) State what additional information is necessary

-

in order to determine whether construction of the proposed design will be consistent with the health and

'

safety of the public.

. 7. With. respect to each allegation in paragraph 24 of your' petition, .

'

(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify

"

each such document. .

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person. ,

8. In explanation of paragraph 25 of your petition, (i) Identify the components and engineering of safeguards referred to in the first sentence of said paragraph.

(b) Identify the procedures for inspection and replace-ment of critical components which you deen inadequate.

,

.

(c) State each and every respect in which you contend that the aforesaid procedures are inadequate.

,

, (d) Set forth in.det, ail the procedures which you believe would be adequate for the purposes attempted to be' served

by the procedures identified in your answer to part (b)

'

of this interrogatory.

.

t 4

'$

-

  • , , ,

, , , . . , ,,, . . - . - . ~ . . , , , - . - . - _ . , _ m-,.

'

.

.

  • r

. . -(~)

.

-

.

9. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 25 of

'

your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify

. .

each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name , . address,

,

by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each per' son involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to -

each person.

10. In explanation of paragraph 26 of your petition, set for'th each and every respect in which the quality control and quality assurance procedures and programs described in the PSAR are inadequate, incomplete and unacceptable to assure that the Midland Plants will be built in conformance with the design as

"

set forth in the PSAR.

11. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 26 of your petition,

\

(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address,

.

by whom employed, with what group or organization

'

affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved  ;

therein, and.the complete substance of what-was said by

.

and to each person. , -

"

l

-

l

,

-)

-

-. - --. .___._:.__. ._ __ , _ _

.

, .

'

. .

g .n

.

12. In explanelion of the second sentence of paragraph 27 of your petition, (a) Identify each of the non-nuclear but related safety aspects of Dow Chemical Company's operation with respect to which you contend inadequate safe-guards exist to protect against a cut-off of the source of steam in the event of a shutdown of the

.

nuclear plant. .

(b) State each and every respect in which the aforesaid safeguards are inadequate.

(c) State in detail what safeguards would be ,

'

adequate for this purpose.

13. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 27 of your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify ear:h such document.

(b) If it is based on oral connunication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization .

affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by

- and to each person.

. -

14. In explanation of paragraph 28 of your petition,

(a) Identify the corrosive gas or gases referred to -1

'

therein.

.

O

.

- --. ,

. . . . .. --

, .

,-

.- -

p/

.

.

(b) Trace the sequence of events by :which instru-  ;

m'entation and electronic control systems in the proposed nuclear plants might be affected.

(c) Identify the safety measures which might thereby be made inoperable.

15. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 28 of
  • your petition, ,

'

document or documents, (a) If it is based on an identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, wlth what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) o'f each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by pnd to each person. -

16. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 29 of

,

your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

.(b) If it is based on oral communicacion, state the

,

dates and places thereof, the identity (by name,

'

address, by whom employed, with what group or

'

organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance l 1

of what was said by and to each person.

.

  • \

-

l

-

- - __ . . _ . -

-. . . - - - - . . - ..

-

.

- -

Q ,

17. (a) State each and every respect in which the design and intended operation of each or any system or major component

- part proposed to be used in the proposed plants is unsatisfactory or objectionable. ,

,

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based. .

'

(c) If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory

.is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

18. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 31 of your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

'

- (b) If'it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or

.

organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each

'

person involved therein, and the complete substance

  • of what was said by and to each person.

.

~

19. With respect to each' allegation in paragraphs 32 through 35 of your petition,

_(a) If it is based on any document or. documents,

,

identify each such document. .

.

0

'

i L.'

' *

- - , _ _ _ _ _ _

  • -

, f)

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the

~

dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

With respect to each concern, contention and allegation

.

20.

in paragraphs 36 thropgh 40 of your petition, ,

(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

21. (a) Set forth each and every deficiency which you believe exists in the technical qualifications and quality control and quality assurance procedures of the vendors of the majcr component parts of the proposed plants. ,

,

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to

. part (a) of this interrogatory is based.

(c) If your answer to part (a) > of this interrogatory. is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom

.

.

-, - -.

.- - - -

7 .

~

.

. ,-

'

.

employed, with what group or organization. affiliated and for .

whom. acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

,

(d) State the manner in which each alleged deficiency listed in your answer to part (a) of this ir.terrogator-f could

,

be satisfactori1y remedied. ,

,

22. With respect to each allegation in paragraphs 42 through

.

44 of your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, l

identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communicaticn, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address,

.

by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

23. With respect to paragraph 47 of your petition, (a) Identify each and every nuclear plant radioactive waste system, either in production or on which production
  • is planned, which prevents any radioactivity in any

.

form fr,om being emitted. into the environment.

.

. (b) State the name and address of the manufacturer

- of each such system.

(c) Describe the basic design concepts of each such system.

.

%

  • e

.

.

M> > m  % m.-- ' .

.

-Q (3

-

. .

. _

1,3

.

,

24. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 47 of your petition,

'

,-

.(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such docwnent.

'

a) If it is based on oral communication, state the

,

dates ,tnd places thereof, the identity (by name,

.

addre's, by Whom employed, with what group or orgt.nization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

25. In explanation of paragraph 48 of your petition, (a) State what the effects on the public would be of

.

radiation waste products in the event of the occurrence of the contingencies referred to in said paragraph 48.

(b) Set forth in detail the basis for your belief that I

these effects would occur in the event of said contingencies.

(c) Identify each document upon which your answers to parts (a) and (b) of this interrogatory are based.

(d) If your answers to parts (a) and (b) of this

,

interrogatory are based in whole or in part on oral communication,

- state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, Eby.whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and

'

for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete

~

substance of what was said by and to each person.

-

.

e

.

.

e

' - - . . - - , -

- . .. ,---,m-- ., . -

._ ..

-

--

7.

, . . s - 12-

,

26 With respect to each allegation in paragraph 49 of

.

your petition,.

(a) If it'is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name,

'

address, by whom employed, with what group or

,

o,rganization* affiliated and for whom acting ~) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

27. (a) State what dangerous illnesses and injuries will occur from radioactive effluents reaching man from the Midland Plants and comingicd in whole or in part with chemical effluents from the Dow Chemical company plant, and identify the effluents and state the manner of their comingling.

,

(b) State in detail the basis for your belief that the illnesses and injuries listed in your answer to part Cal of this

.

interrogatory will occur from radioactive effluents reaching man from the Midland Plants and comingled in whole or in part with chemical efflu,ents from the Dow Chemical Company Plant.

.

Ocl Identify each document upon which your answers to Parts Ca] _and Cb] of this interrogatory are based.

(d) If your answers to parts (a) and (b) of this inter- i rogatory are based in'whole or in part on oral communication, state the ' dates and places thereof, the ~iden'tity (by name, address, by

.

4

. .

-

.

'

-- . .

+e . .. , ,m., , , = - ..--y. ,,.i..e . % o .43 -ww.,. - <, e

-

-.. - -. . . - - - .

6

.

'

. . - rs, ,, .

-13a ,

whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and fbr whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the canprete substance of what was said by and to each person.

23'. . (a) State each and every respect in which Applicant's radiation monitoring system is insufficient and incomplete ad'quately.to e monitor radiation both in normal operation of the. proposed plants as well as during those moments after a

.

maximum hypothetical accident. -

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to part. (a) of this interrogatory is based.

(c) If'your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory ir based'in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and' places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom emp.loyed, with what group or organization affiliated and Ebr whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete I

substance of'what was said by. and to each person.

23 '. (a) Describe in detail the " completely remote control and'other sophisticated monitoring systems" referred to in the  ;

rast. sentence of ' paragraph 51 of your petition, and set forth l the. names and~ addresses of their manufacturers.

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to part (a) of~this interrogatory is based.

~

. (c)- If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is

based ~in whole or in.part on oral communication, state the dates and' praces thereof, the id' entity (by name, address, by whom l

,

1

. l

.

'

.

e L

.

. . - .- .

', . A ,,

-

employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for -

whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

30. .( a) State in detail what an " adequate meteorological survey" of the type referred to in paragraph 52 of your petition

'

would consist of and the reasons why such a survey is necessary for the purpose referred to in'said paragraph.

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to

part (a) of this interrogatory is based..

l (c) If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for

- whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

31. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 54 of your petition, (a) If it is based'on any document or documents,

'

identify each such document. .

(b) If it is based on oral canmunication, state the

,

dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address,

. by whom employed, with what group or organization

,

affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, an,d the. complete substance of what'was said

. ,

by and to each person.

_

O G

i i

I _ . - . ~ , -_

- . ...

.

-

.- . .

_ .

,

. .-

O ., em

,

.

.

,

32. With respect to each allegation in the'second sentence of paragraph 58 of your petition,

~

(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

,

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and . places thereof, the identity (by name, address, i .

<

by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said

,

by and to each person.

33. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 60 of your petition,

.

(a) If it is based on any document or documents,

.

identify each such document. .

(b). If it is based on oral communication, state the dates. and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved

'therein, and the complete substance of what was said by e-3 to each person.

34. Identify'the letter referred to in paragraph 61 of your: petition. ,
35. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 61 of

. .

your petition, ,

I (a) If it is based on any document or documents,

'

,

... . identify each such document. -

-

.

e  ;

, , _ - - , , - , . - ~ . - , . . - . . . . . , , . . . , -~-

- -

.. . - . . . . - .

.-

.

. A ,'

.

(bl If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name,

,

address, by whom employed, with what group or organization

.

affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

36. With regard to the fear of a continuing decrease in Midland's population as a result of.the building of the proposed plants expressed in paragraph 62 of your petition, (a) If it is based on any docenent or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

37. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 63 of

.

-

your petition, l

.

(a) If it is based on any document or documents,

-

identify each such document. )

1 (b) If it is based o,n oral communication, state the i

.

  • dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address,

-by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved 1

-

.

j

.

e

,,

_ - .. __ _ _ . _ _ _ _

_ ,

- .- .. -

_ __

-

. ,

, .

Q r'

<

,

'

.

therein, and the complete substance of what was

,

said by and to each person.

38. (a) Set forth each and every " higher and better use or

.

purpose" of the type referred to in paragraph 63 of your petition which you know of and explain why it would be higher and/or better.

,

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based. '

(c) If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom

'

employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for

~

whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

39. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 64 of

.

your petition,

,

(a) If it is based on any doc nent or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral cammunication, state the -

dates and places ,thereof, the identity (by name,

,

address, by whom ' employed, witd1 what group or

,

,

organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each

,

person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each. person. .

40. With respect to each. allegation-in paragraph 65,of your petition, .

..

J(a) If it is based on any document or documents, H iden$ifv each 'ssch' document.

. -

.. -- -

7 -

_

.

. .- ,

R O

.

.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organiza-tion affiliated and for whom acting) of each person

, involved therein, and the complete substance of what

~

was said by and to each person.

_

41. (a) State what effect, if any, the proposed plants 3 will have on the recrealional activities described in paragraph 65 of your petition.

-

,

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to

'

part (a) of this interrogatory is based.

(c) If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory

.

is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates'and placed thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete sub-stance of what was said by and to each person.

42. In explanation of paragraph 68 of your petition, (a)' Specify each and'every respect in which you

.

contend that the water quality of the Tittabawassee River will be further depreciated and degraded by the operation of the Midland nuclear plants.

(b) Specify each and.every respect in which the

'

' analysis and consideration of the imposition of the

.

Midland plants under NEPA have been inadequate.

1 l

  • I

,

.

_ . -. '

. .

-- . . . . .

. .-

  • q ,m

'

.

,

-19" ,

43. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 68 of ,

.

  • your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whoa employed, with what group or organization' affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete sub-

.

stance of what was said by and to each person.

44. In connection with paragraph 69 of your petition,

.

(a) Describe in detail "the peculiar atmospheric conditions" referred to therein. .

(b) Describe in detail the evaporation and fogging 4

problems and other atmospheric effects which you contend will occur as a result of the daily operation

.

of the proposed plants' cooling ponds.

(c) Set forth each and every respect in which you contend that'the consideration given to the evaporation, fogging and other atmospheric effects pursuant to NEPA, referred to in said paragraph 68, has not been adequate.

,

, (d) Identify each document upon which your answers

>

to parts (a) , (b) and (c) of this interrogatory are

'

based.

.

.

_ . . ~. -

=. -. . . - . . - . , . - . . . - . -

-

, ,. r'  !^'

.

. -

(e) If your answers to parts (a), (b) and (c)

.

' of this interrogatory are based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and

.

places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by _

whom employed, with what group or organization

.

affiliated and for whom acting) of each person in-volved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

45.

With respect to each allegation in paragraph 70 of your petition, .

.

(a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the da'tes and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organi-zation affiliated and for whom acting) of each person

.

involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

46. (a)

State in detail what effect you believe the proposed plants will have upon the growth of industries in Midland and in the greater metropolitan Tri-City area.

(b) Identify each' document upon which your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is' based. ~

'

(c)

If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based-in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates

c . .

3 p

.

.

and places thereof, the identity (by name, . address, by whom -

employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person. t

47. (a) Set forth each. and every adverse effect which you codtend that,the proposed plants would have on the environ-ment and which is not set forth in your petition.

(b) Identify each document upon which your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based.

~

(c) If your answer to part (a) of'this interrogatory is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof,- the identity-(by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and'for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete aub-stance of what was said by and to each person.

48. In connection with paragraph 71 of your petition, state in detail what analyses, other than those specifically referred

.

to in your petition, you contend must be made for a complete and valid implementation of the five categories of environmental protection set forth in NEPA.

"

49. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 72 of your

-

. petition,

. (a) If it is based on any document or documents,

. identify each such document. .

(b) If it.is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address,

.

.

-em , , _ ,

  • ' '"" ""W*+ a - ,.m . , , , ,

. .. .f '- p

.

. .

by whom employed, with what group or organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of what was said by and to each person.

With respect to each allegation in paragraph 73 of

.

50.

your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents ,

,

identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state

,

the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or organ-ization affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete subs'tance of what was said by and to each person.

51. With respect to each allegation in the first sentence of paragraph 74 of your petition, (a) ,If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document.

(b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name,

'

address, by whom employed, with what group or organiza-tion affiliated and for whom acting) of each person involved thereir., and the complete substance of what

"

was_said by and to each person.

.

.

. . , -..

--

.

.. m 9 _

.

. .

,,

.

52. In connection with' paragraph 75 of your petition,
state and explain each and every. respect in which the standards for the construction and operation of a nuclear power plant

.

denominated " experimental" are less stringent than those denomi-nated as " commercial" reactors.

53. (a) State each and every respect in which. approval by

-

the Commission of the location of the proposed plants would be

,

in contravention of the criteria set forth in its regulations.

(b) Identify each document upon whi.4 your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory is based.

(c) If your answer to part (a) of this interrogatory

'

is based in whole or in part on oral communication, state the

-

dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom acting) of each person involved therein, and the complete substance of~what was said by and to each person.

54. With respect to each allegation in the first two

.

sentences in paragraph 77 of your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, identify each such document. ,

(b) If it is ba' sed on oral communication, state the dates and places thereof, the identity (by name, address , b-; whom employed, with what group or

.

organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each

,

person involved therein, and the complete substance of.what was said by and to each person. *

.

_

- - _._ ..

(

..- < . .

. .

-

.

( (

'

.

r=

.

.

'55. With respect to each allegation in paragraph 78 of p your petition, (a) If it is based on any document or documents, 9 E..

identify each such document. 3 o

'

E (b) If it is based on oral communication, state the dates and pla'ces thereof, the identity (by name, address, by whom employed, with what group or ' ( :.

F organization affiliated and for whom acting) of each

,

-

i person involved therein, and the complete substance .

of what was said by and to each person.

4 January 7, 1971.

,

.

.

  • LOWENSTEIN AND NEWMAN

-

By Mi% /

Attorneys for C6nsumers Power Company

- 1100 Connecticut Ave., N.W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 0 H

^

G <

.1 W<#h(7 n.% Q,

.,

. ,,

RICHARD G.. SMITH, Esq.

Smith & Brooker, P.C.

210-212 Phoenix Bldg.

Say City, Michigan 48706 if ..

To: Myron M. Cherry, Esq. .

McDermett, Will & Emery j-111 West Monroe Street l

'

Chicago, Ill. 60603

.

.

_ _ _ _