ML20027B262
| ML20027B262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/13/1982 |
| From: | Stamiris B STAMIRIS, B. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8209160591 | |
| Download: ML20027B262 (1) | |
Text
__-_
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cornission DOCKETED In the Matter of Docket Nos.
USNRC CPC Midland Plant 50-329 OL Units 1&2 50-330 OL 12 SEP 15 40:50 EEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY /JJD LICENSING BOARD OFFICE 0F SECRtIAs.
DOCKETING & SERVICE BRANCH ST/>J.11RIS DISCOVERY TO NRC EASED ON IiEW INFORIS. TION IN FES 9/13/82 (Stamirls 8/30/8Z Interrogatorf. definitions contained an error.
E. substitute "NRC Staff" for "CPC/Bechtel or other plant In line 2 employees Definitior.s apply henceforth as corrected.)
Contention I b.
In the FES,(p5-51)'.the NRC states,"Since 1960, 68 nuclear reactors i.havei.been dr are in the process of being decommissioned.
Although no large commercial reactor has undergone decommisyloning to date, the broad base of experience gained from, smaller facilities is generally relevantto the decommissioning of anyytype of nucisar facility.*
Interrogatory 1 Name the reactors from this group of 68 which have been or are being decommissioned by the prompt removal / dismantlement method '
and provide their: a) datet.df completion, b) cost of completion, c) begawatt capacity (or other description of sire), d)date. of decommis-sioning; e) cost of decomissioning, f) decommissioning cost as % of construction cost, converted into like completion year dollar values.
(Ple ase explain this inflation-conversion calculation.)
Respectfully submitted, cc: ASLB members W Paton, NRC Barbara Stamiris m 'Mi'11er, CPC Secretary, NRC 8209160591 820913 2r ' '. MN'!,fe Y'
Nd' ' '
PDR ADOCK 05000329 t\\
-1' - '
G PDR
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _