ML20106F653

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response Opposing Intervenor B Stamiris 841224 Motion for Evidentiary Hearings Re Litigation Between Applicant & Dow Chemical Co.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20106F653
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 02/08/1985
From: Williams F
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.), ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#185-569, CON-#185569 OL, OM, NUDOCS 8502140042
Download: ML20106F653 (54)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:7.. l$W)L$.i g

s... g I,

E i y UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION eq {l?O k ~ BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD y - '85 79 In the Matt.er of ) N2/24 ) . CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ~ ) Docket Nos. 50-329 OM &-OL' ) 50-330 OM & OL (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 ) APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO INTERVENOR 'STAMIRIS' PLEADING OF DECEMBER 24, 1984 I.: -Introduction3 'On December 24, 1984, Intervenor Barbara Stamiris ifiled a pleading entitled "Intervenor Stamiris' Request'for ~ Evidentiary Hearings on~ Matter Raised in;the CPCO-Dow Trial, fand.Referrallof Certain Matters to the Off5'.ce of .e

Investigations", ("the Request").

The'Reduest, iht'er!alia, _ l soughtsto expand the Board's reopening of the record related to. -the lit [gation between Consumers - Power CENEpany' (" Consumers"._or ,r w- _y. b " Applicant") and: Dow Chemical. Company -("Dow")- to consider ::(1) L.tihe! circumstances surrounding the. substitution _ of. boring -l$gs Q w w'.

from elsewhere in-Midland;in.placecof the correct ones for the' o

r .diese1Efuel oil / tank area and -(2)c.twg? segments of testimonyLof ~ '3r.eDonald Horn. The Applicant beli^evesLthat, in the present: n:; i posturefof th'is proceeding,.a' request-foq piecemeal' review of ~ m. m,p gy d'l/- iConsumers* Power CompanyL(Midland. Plant,. Units.'l and 2),z - LBP.-8 4-20,'_19 N. R.C. -- 12 8 5, (19 8 4 ) ,j 'f[v ~ _ :- ; ~. 5021 6 2 850208-DR ADOCK 05000329 4, ' Q ;9 -PDR

m .m t ~

  1. information raised in the Dow litigation is premature,
wasteful,Jand indeed contrary to the thrust of the relief

~ - sought in:the-Request itself. The Applicant therefee requests

the! Board [to-refrain'from entertaining any further such q
requests'until. Consumers notifies the Board that it is contemplating the restart of construction on the Midland Project.

+ Advis~ ability-of Waiting Until Reactivation LII. A's:the Board is well aware, on' July 16, 1984 . Consumers, shut.down' construction'of the Midland plant. See

Board 6N tification.84-148, Sept. 14,-1984.

Mr. John D. Selby, [i'n:an$ affidavit furnished to the Board, indicated that' ' Consumers"had no~ plans to resume constructionLon the Plant. ' Consumers 5LetterL:to Board,.Nov.;5, 1984..Moreover, as the ^ ' Board notedfin its.' Partial Initial Decisioni("PID"), the ~~ f fApplicant;-has, proposed that no further hearings be held at:thi's= Ltime.: : Consumers-1 Power' Company :(Midland Plant 1 Units-1. and ' 2),.,

LBP 2, Eslip 'opidion L at..-(Jan. 23, 1985)..

~ .CircumstancesT::therefore greatly. distinguish: the.: c rrent:: situation from ~ thatiin ~ which ithe-Board afound 'itself1in - LBP-84-20,ysupra,;.wheni t reopened the/r'ecord to-hear certain-i 3, Dow{ issues. Atithatlpointi both construction ~~of the proje'ct ? Jand;th'.L.hearingsiwere; active'Jat1present construction.of? he' e t 4 3_ projectkisJsuspend$dland)nothearings areischeduled.-_Indeed,. 4the? Board in?LBP-85-2' characterized the; quality' assurance and-l g, , ? management attitddelissues!in the; case generally 1asibeingfof. b

m c .q: " uncertain; materiality, even if work on the project were ever-sto be' resumed." LBP-85-2, supra at 4. In such circumstances -itiwould!be a waste of the resources of the Board and the parties ^for the Bosrd to entertain this, or any future, )

requests' to' reopen ~the record based on the Dow litigation,

' absent some-indication by Consumers that.it_ intends to revivify r theiproject and pursue the licensing hearings. .It_would~in any event be unsound practice for the , Board to indulge in item by item review of fragments of

testimony'from the Dow litigation before the entire record is

~ ' Tavai1able. Isolated excerpts of any record can be seriously smisleading. To:make. decisions regarding the necessity for. 'furtherLhearings beforeLthis Board based on a partialfrecord in Ethe'Dowelitigation mayclead-at-best toiconfusion-and at worst- !to serious error. -Intervenor Stamiris has-acknowledged as much' Lin theiRequest by 'asking the Board lin effect1to defer rulingon 'the Request.until'afternthe completionfof-the Dow, trial.. And, EasJthe Board has inoted,: theLissues1in the Dow litigation of~ ~ q ~ LinterestlinLthis proceeding are lidited.. LBP-84-20,-supra at 1302. ~ lMoreover,t in LBP-84-20',- the=pivotalLissue was whether {the? rec _ord should'be reopened to. encompass:Dow; issues at all. -e- ' Here (tha'tiquestiion' is -notipos'ed. ; The'~ Board has already decided 1 in. LBP.-85-2', - ' supra -a't :. 3 59, ' to -retain:: jurisdiction to liear. 'further? matters' arising out of_the Dowl litigation'- Thus,-no. yprejudice rto eanyone Dand : substantial benefit, would accrueifrom ~ O f 9* 'g i b-'. ,.u. k '

deferr'ing'all motions to expand litigation of Dow issues in this proceeding.at.least until Consumers gives notification of . reactivation of the project'. .The. instances cited by Ms. Stamiris in the Request . amply _ demonstrate that reviewing seriatim the material - unc. overed in the Dow litigation would be unwise. With respect' .to"the'information discovered regarding the boring logs B-1 to i B 4 at the. Diesel Fuel Oil Tank location, the Applicant issued ~ aL10 C.F.R'. S 50.55(e) report on December 21, 1984. In that ~ - report, Consumers set forth the information presently available regarding the boring log substitution. Consumers also ' indicated ~that it would not pursue further investigation or treporting unless the Midland project is reactivated. Under these: circumstances,othere is essentially nothing to litigate. The1 Board-implicitly recognized the' futility'of prompt hearings on this' issue-in its PID.. LBP-85-2, supra at.15-16. 2fL Ms. Stamiris alsoLreliesaan a' newspaper report gg - oneEsegment'of test'imony and a brief quotation of another from 2 ' the/Dow transcript as. supporting a need foriexpanded litigation uaf Dow issues;in~this proceeding.,The' chosen segments, - h'owever,Jconstitute highly selective.use of testimony to . support.a preconceived inference that facts:.relatingJto soils ~ ~2/- Reliance'on a newspaper' account,'without examination o'f ithe-: actual transcript, is,Jin'itself,: improper and unsound. l-h.' a .-- 4 j - L_

ac7: ' settlement issues have been withheld from this Board. As Lcloser analysis shows, neither of these examples rises to a level-of substantiality sufficient to warrant further inquiry Lin;this l'icensing proceeding. Ms. Stamiris' first example makes,a reference to -testimony of Donald' Horn supported only by a terse and oblique 're'erence in a newspaper article. The sketchy report is f suphosedtoreflectnondisclosureofimportantinformation regarding soils problems to the NRC. In the actual testimony.in question Mr. Horn is testifying about the authenticity of a Quality Assurance. Daily Log l Sheet dated November 30, 1978 which he prepared and signed. (A copyfof this Dow trial exhibit is attached hereto as Appendix A.) The document, inter alia, contains'an agenda-for q- {a meeting with the NRC Staff regarding the Diesel Generator ~ Building to be_ held on December 4, 1978.- In pertinent _part, .that ag'enda reads:. " Chuck would statethat borings.are complete i'n'all areas. Testing is complete for Diesel Generator' Building..Also,7no settlement in other areas;was to be: mentioned."1. Appendix::A 'at p. 2.- Ms. Stamiris'Eimplication:is that.this agenda 1 e x c e r p t,: taken outnof context, proves that the Applicant. ' intended-to withhold.information.about settlement of_ Category I-4 4 - 5 ' -- L

~

buildings other'than the Diesel Generator building from the NRC fat _the' December 4, 1978 meeting.

A look at the totality of the frecord both in the Dow litigation and before this Board shows -just the contrary.. In-fact ~, there should be no implication that . documents ofLthis genre were. withheld from the NRC or the ~ -Board.. Although this particular log. dated November-30,.1978 is not an" exhibit:before this'-Board, Mr. Eugene Gallagher testifiedffrom another of Mr. Horn's QA logs dated December 21, -1978 afterfrefreshing his recollection from a number of such~ ~ logs shown?him by~Mr. Zamarin. Tr. 2337.(July.15, 1981). -There?is no reason to believe that the Novembec 30 log was not-

part of_Lthe discovery and disclosure process preceding,the.l.981

-hearings.- 4 Secondly, whatever thel"no settlement was'to be- ' mentioned", sentence seems to meanLin the11solated contex'~of c t the excerpted agenda, thereLis"no' evidence that the: meeting ,sparticipants, especially Mr.-Horn,-actually;withheldLany-

information from the--NRC.

On.the' contrary, the meeting notes' ~ Lof the4Decembern4. meeting with the NRCLStaff.(Appendix.B- , hereto).j sh'owf thati the participants : in-the ' December'.4 meeting - - were;there :toidiscuss the settlement ~ off other Category:I-r E3/<' Citations to: transcript;ofithis proceedingiare given as Tr.,_;..% Citations'to the:DowElitigation~ transcript arei given:as DowfTrial Tr. __.:. a Y ., se. 2l me b -~

. structures,.not just the Diesel Generator. Building: "The .purposeiof the meeting was to inform the NRC of the status of the~ settlement problem of the diesel generator building and ,other-structures at the Midland Plant." Appendix B at p. 2. This set-of~ meeting notes was introduced as Stamiris Exhibit 7 in this' proceeding.. One need-not rely utterly on documentary _ evidence as -to -the meaning of Mr. Horn's testimony paraphrased in the November 14, 1984 newspaper article. On December 20, 1984,-he testified in the trial about his November 30 log and about the

December 4 meeting itself.

He stated that the agenda item-meant'that the lack of settlement in other Category I structures was'to be mentioned to the NRC as a positive item-and:that the meeting focused.on Category I structures.4/ 4/' Mr. Horn' testified specifically: Q. He asked you or had you read the sentence concerning status report fori ~Bechtel and a line that reads: ~ " Chuck.would state that: borings are-complete in-all areas. Testing ~is complete.--for diesel generator building.: ~ Also; no settlement in'otherl areas:was-to be mentioned." Can.you explain what'the df.scussion was at the November 30, 1978, meeting .regarding this'particular portio'n'of. ~

your notes as reflected in
your11og?-

A. The. statement "Also, no settlement >in (Footnote Continued) --7.- b

)Mr.-Horn also specifically testified (Dow Trial Tr. 3579) that the'Bechtel meeting minutes of-the December 4, 1978 meeting -- . Stamiris' Exhibit 7 -- shows that Category I structures were s discussed at the December 4 meeting.. Any inference from the ' Dow trial'that the Applicant withheld information about settlement of other Category I structures from the NRC is not supportable. The second testimony excerpt cited by Ms. Stamiris is a further example of selective use of a fragment of testimony . toidistort the-meaning of the whole. Again, the totality of theorecord.available: supports just the reverse of shat Ms.fStamiris asserts. The Request at p. 3 quotes but one- . question and-answer from a lengthy interrogation-of Mr. Horn by (Foo'tnote. Continued)' other areas was:to be mentioned,":was'to be a.. positive statement'... It was to indicate to the NRC that'we did'not-have' excessive settlement in~other areas and therefore that was to be~ mentioned, the' fact-that we'did not have settlement in: other areas. Q..- Now,-at your meetingion December'4thL with'the NRC, wasLtheLfocus of that . meeting -- the' discuss' ion;'I should say, lof that meeting 1 focused on Category 1 '

structures?

w A. 'To the~best:of my recollection it was Categoryf1 structures. -Dow; Trial Tr.~3573-74. (The entire transcript segment.from-which this-quote is: excerpted is attached-hereto as Appendix C.) 6. ~

= i 3 Mr. Goold (Dow Trial Tr. 2472) for the proposition that ( " Applicant had a greater awareness of the extent of the soils f settlement problems in 1977 following the Administration Building grade' beam settlement, than was revealed in the OM/OL proceeding."5/ In other words, the Request implies that -5/ Ms. Stamiris cites Donald Horn's November 9, 1984 Dow trial testimony in such a manner as to suggest that Mr. Horn was stating his own personal knowledge. In fact, even the quoted question and answer themselves show that lir. Horn is testifying as to what the document in question says, not to his personal knowledge of the subiect matter of the document, namely the U.S. Testing compaction tests at the Administration Building. 2 Lest there be any doubt as to that conclusion, a few i pages earlier in the transcript Mr. Goold had the 7 following colloquy with Mr. Horn: 7 Q. Nobody advised you at the time that 7 tests had been rerun and the results of i that reexamination showed that the j " percent compaction was in all cases a lower than that previously determined?" ? A. I don't recall that. Q. Nobody from -- you didn't discuss that r4 with anyone from U.S. Testing? A. Not that I recall. Q. Did you discuss it with anyone from Consumers Power? A. Not that I recall. Q. Did you discuss this information with gg gnyone from Bechtel? t 5 A. Not that I recall. g ej Dow Trial Tr. 2469. d q44 m -j

Consumers withheld information on the details of the analysis L

of the Administration Building grade beam settlement problem from.the parties and the Board. As the record shows, however, the~ parties and the Board had ample opportunity to inquire into the: Administration Building problems in the 1981 hearings. The subject matter of the interrogation of Mr., Horn quoted in the Request is known to the Board and to the parties to this proceeding. The document with respect to which Mr. Horn is testifying is the initial Bechtel Report on the Administration Grade Beam failure, issued in December, 1977. -(A; copy of this report is attached as Appendix D.) This Report, though app rently never introduced as an exhibit-in this proceeding, was furnished to NRC' inspectors during their investigation of soils settlement matters.

See, e.g., prepared testimony of Hood, Kimball'and Gallagher, July 10, 1981 following1Tr. 1560; Gallagher, Tr.-2351, 2554.

Ms.-Stamiris hersel;,-in the course.of a' lengthy examination of Consumers . witness Howell in July of 1981, indicated that she had access to a draft of-the document which was the. subject of Mr. Horn's testimony. Tr. 2816. More importantly, testimony was presented.to this-Board'with respect'to the facts. underlying the.evidencetin the N -Dow trial to which Ms. Stamiris' Request: refers. The flaws in ~ Lthe soil compaction test proceduresjused by U.S. Testing .bompany in~its-analysis o.' the Administration Building ^ grade beam-settlement were addressed by Consumers witness Keeley in ~ F -.10 - e:'

I his prefiled direct testimony.- Mr~. Keeley explicitly discussed

the' recalculated results of the proctor tests.5

-Moreover,' Chairman Bechhoefer questioned NRC witness Gallagher~about the inferences which should have been drawn ~ from the information contained in the report. Gallagher, Tr. 2572-75. Clearly, the Boar'd and the parties had opportunity to W ventilate the subject of the Administration Building proctor . tests.. Again, the suggestion that Consumers withheld information from this Board is insupportable. III. Conclusion Neither of the examples from the Dow transcript gives rise to'any.n'ew issues or suggests any new conclusions on~any ~ -1 -issues:previously litigated before this Board. Given the- ~ flimsiness of the basis for the claim that these two excerpts b Mr. Keeley's testimony reads:. In August, 1977, Consumers Power,became z. . aware of-settlement of a grade l beam for_the ,~ Administrative Building, a non-safety ~ related structure.. Investigation indicated that in the affected area the fill.had been compacted to a'value lowerithan-that required --by~ the -specification. It was ~ determined that.the testing contractor, U.S. Testing, had. selected lower maximum. laboratory dry densityJstandards:than were appropriate, which resulted in an indication that the soils underlyingfthe1 grade beam had

been compacted'to greater"than-95%'of optimum.- In actuality, such soils were compacted in'a range of 83.1% to 90.5% of optimum.-

Keely,1 prepared testimony:at-5,-following Tr. 1163. W Nt _ 11 - -j O ..?

r_.,

i -

' from~the Dow transcript contain new information or suggest that Consumers withheld'information from this Board, the Board .should indicate that it will not consider further motions to raopen the record unless and until additional hearings are-scheduled in this' proceeding. Respectfully submitted, Frederick C. Williams Isham, Lincoln & Beale 1120 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 833-9730 . Dated: February 8, 1985 1 P - 12.-

o. t. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR-REGULATORY COMMISSION ' BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD 'In'the Matter of. ) ) CONSUMERS ~ POWER COMPANY ) . Docket Nos. 50-329 OM & OL ) 50-330 OM & OL (Midland Plant, Units l' ) -and 2) ,) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Frederick C. Williams, one of the attorneys for ' Consumers Power. Company, hereby certify that copies.of the.. Applicant's Response to Intervenor Stamiris' Pleading of . December-24,.1984.were served'upon all persons shown in the. attached service list by deposit in the United States' mail, first class, postage prepaid, this 8th day of February, 1985. ^t e=W Frederick C. Williams eh E' .i

V 5.- M.2. . Frank J. Kolloy, Esq. Stavo Gadler, Esq. f Attorney Goncral of the 2120 Cartor Avenue ~ State of Michigan St. Paul, Minnsecta 55108 Carole Steinberg, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety & Licensing Environmental Protection Div. Appeal Panel 720 Law Building U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm. Lansing,-Michigan 48913 Fashington, D. C. 20555 ~Mvron M. Cherrv., Esc.. Mr. Scott W. Stucky Cherry & Flynn Chief, Dccketing & Services Suite 3700 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc==. Three First National Plaza Office of the Secretary . Chicago, Illinois 60602 Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Wendell H. Marshall Ms. Mary Sinclair 4625 S. Saginaw Road 5721 Sc==erse: Street Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. William D. Paton, Esq. Atomic Safety & Licensing Counsel.for the NRC Staff Board Panel U.S. Nuclea Regulatory C =. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm. Washington, D. C. 20555 Washington, D.12. 20555 Atomic Safety & Licensing Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Board Panel 6152 N. Verde Trail U.S. Nuclear Regulancry Cc =. Apt. 3-125 Washington, D. C.- 20555 Boca Raton, Florida 33433 Ms. Barbara Stamiris Mr. D. F. Judd 5795 North River Road Babcock & Wilcox Route 3 P. O. Sex 1260 Freeland, Michigan 48622 Lynchburg, Virginia 24505 Dr. Jerry Harbcur James E. Brunner, Esq. Atomic Safety & Licensing Consumers Power Cc=pany Board Panel 212 West Michigan Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regula cry C0==.- 0 Jackson, Michigan 49201 Washin,gton, D. C. 20555 Lynne Bernahei, Esq. Thomas Devine, Esq. Louis Clark, Esq. Governmen: Accountability Project of the Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Q Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20009 Samuel A. Haubcid, Esq. Kirkland~& Ellis 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago,- Illinois 60601

DISCIPLINE: O[IIN ~ hid'd-CONSUMERS Pts dR COWANY

    • 3u" I

7b ^ 'I PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES DAILY LOC SHEET PAGE l 0F NCR ENTERED BY . WRITTEN CORRECTIVE ACTION, CLOSURE DATE, AND ACTIVITY SICHATURE & DATE FINDING AND/OR EVALUATION YES/NO SIGNATURE OF PERSON CLOSINC ' ITEM ' u. o',( 2,I[ie'.- fh*gN1andPlantUnits1&2 NO N' h [ 8lI5v.All rawMg g Ih!'"~tw M /I V > M, u se m b 4 g l. go.7 g Diesel Generator Building Q T4'Js 2c Meeting with NRC 1 Date: December 4, 1978 O >wk n,..ua2a. - ,'= g /o%tg /,LQgg Agenda: g 'd - I. Introduction by Don Miller or 4 g M /4 % dWE. Gil Keeley iv s

  • IJt

- ( *[1" ' ll. History by Bechtel (Chuck McConne ) - ~~ -<8-b * #"'*",I a. Brief. history of site fill N N. placement hh b. Survey discovery g, .fuJM' c. Other category I structures 6 fb d. Settlement of Diesel Generatoi 8. 6 va 4-Building and pedestals r

  • t O]4

\\ '.I. gjp e. Review settlement data and ,'f

  • g,,,.,.yyg... 4('-[,dl drawings (SK-C-620/623) 7*,,

if ,yp f. Rates of settlement before ani i af ter cutting of duct bank 13,. p,,% l.... [ * *{3 h, s g. Consultants - Name the, con-sultants Dr.'s Peck and Hendri n, gYg* Dr. Wood and John Dunnicliff I,- I 1. Soil exploration by Bechtel (SherJ f DEFENDANT'S ' 'll' d Afift) EXHIBli b'd I I*. \\'d N1 'I- ' a. Soil borings l l b. Dutch comb penetrations c. Laboratory tesi:s d. Possible causes Cop sent to Section llead -lI'7Y 'Y su" Walt Bird stated he wanted on Bechtel to a' ess acceptance criteria.for_,nal fix.

~ p DISCIPLINE: hhb b CMMS h d NM DATE: 'l[.',xm.N,vt.;I/ l'l78 1 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES. DAILY LOC SHEET PAGE b '0F ~h NCR ENTERED BY WRITTEN CORRECTIVE ACTION, CLOSURE DATE, AND ACTIVITT SIGNATURE & DATE -FINDING AND/OR EVALUATION YES/NO SIGNATURE OF PERSON CLOSING ITEM M *Mf[.I *Iltenw Sherif Afift stated that the f lf) p) lh

m -

( g., . g reason for.using' Dutch comb {. penetrometer was:- g

1..b us h measurement of' Q

strength. (, O 2. Actual comparison of variations of materials IV. Consultants recommendation by Dr. R. D. Peck and C. J. Dunnici lff a. Preload b. Instrumentation V. Status report.by Bechtel (Chuck McConnel)' a. Activities completed Chuck would state.that borin is are complete in all areas. Testing is. complete for Dies el Generator Building.. Also, n i settlement in other areas wa i to be mentioned.- b. Activities in progress Soil monitoring instrumentat lon is approximately 80% complet t. Utilities have been monitore 1. Concrete crack monitoring / recording is in progress. Filling of the pond is in progress. Concrete to be . poured next week in the slab

        • " II

Copy sent to Section Head on I.3 - Il '7 K /g.i,-0.a...:<p) \\ 1 = l.

DISCIPLINE: Oh [dM' CONSUE RS Pt,r.R COWANY ^ 8 I 7 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES DAILY LOG SilEET PAGE 3 0F 6 NCR ENTERED BY WRITTEN CORRECTIVE ACTION, CLOSURE DATE, AND ACTIVITY SICHATURE in DATE FINDING AND/OR EVALUATION YES/NO SIGNATURE OF PERSON CLOSING ITEM I-c. Activities planned for o ll " J 4,2 Future b CD Other structures, condensate o tanks and transformer pads m will be covered in the dis-cd cussion. 7) ~ VI. Schedule by Bechtel The big holdup is the north sect-on for Turbine Building modification a. Overall Project construction 58% complete Engineering 86% complete Structural Concrete 93% comp 1 ete Fuel Loading 11-1-80 First Diesel Generator r.eedet for testing 1-1-80 b. Impact on Project schedule c. Schedule for remedial measure s 'II. Responses to open items in NRC Inspector's report dated 11-17-71 a. FSAR conflicts b. Project specifications confil ets c. NRC question 362.2 FSAR SectI on 2.5.4.5.1 d. Structural aspects of the but Iding settlement It was stated by Ben Margugli o that the Bechtel responses we re ection Head Cophsentto too general and that specif ft , ll_ reference should be made to / t. d,,.l, I,J each comment % meeting wouI d ) i. he set up af. lunch to disc uss ~...

DISCIPLINE: 'hNb '.Yd.A ~ CONSUERS PO sR COWANY ]. I g,' PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES h 0F DAILY LOC SilEET PACE NCR WRITTEN CORRECTIVE ACTION, CLOSURE DATE, AND ENTERED BY ACTIVITY SIGNATURE & DATE FINDING AND/OR EVALUATION YES/NO SIGNA'IllRE OF PERSON CLOSING ITEM j b[ ' i ty <t/tI '-f'" such responses. [./U p " ( > -) V ll % III. Summary and Conclusion of DC by to O Carl Weidner e WIX. Closing comuments by CPCo CD This would include asking NRC what needs the final report they have to close out.

j. I

~ Ib ') ' ~ ' FsAR ccuf1Leh h.:E W.sd< 4 t f es.A l'C' N ~ (I \\ e q m a a & w.u As f, Hz.a,.f.u.d sv :

f..k'.Q w s

(I. t* 7 >> >L w :n p$c. W, .. w.

. a > -

b4p b'4... g i,,f - 33.o.,q q O ' :v 4 A.d. ~,J # cr.a t e- .., W,.u l *-n y. : l 2 .ty.t:,( t/,ffy ),;.3 4+ 0 > V ; '"' <I* - 's h \\ '- C. aem.p,,jg. ? b.{Rl - e.,c .ley ).' eM'.a g%w v c.

w. (M c. a.3:.,..-,.h.)g A...,
  • 7... c. ll e,.

(. y a l'., N,..,,- v D .g"'~b h N' 1 y>.) A,l/.,-,.T '.' .s h, hLs *q. U....o5s.f:*-- .).s, t D A I'* .oirs.te., p. { < ) $ *:'K < S J 4

  • C. s t,'-f: [ Y~~

f G TX, al2 .RV30s.n.A* f, ):1Q.s u Nt'; A'+ ' Y ~~ $ c h c.m ,;c.w ...t a ir.%c.# gl<,g/e,,, 7 ,%.. y ; '., l'. ' A [ l'. W l'- 12 's.s !..$

r. N'

'M ' ' ' Copy sent to Section llead I'7, 8,1's - ~Jy on 0 ~ l V (o. ,. N. '{ * 4 ' f  % f I'O V. %., <tes].ilfri *..

  • t M.

~. ) / -s[ *a,, f.js .c* (s sea 'e' 1 7.-

= . DISC'IPLINE: ' *)(') b l.)hh ~ CONSUDERS Phr.R COM'ANY-3 I,..! PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES DAILY LOG SNEET PACE h 0F NCR-CORRECTIVE'CTION, CLOSURE DATE,~AND A ENTERED BY WRITTEN ACTIVITT __ SIGNATURE & DATE FINDING AND/OR EVALUATION YES/NO SIGNATURE OF PERSON CLOSINC ITEN %M E. TV,.,,w M t H:.r. () >=>d l >,-. ? (> a.3, l (d o Q\\1A FSAR Tul'"x .) N -f, u)41As.,'eM. 5, Y. ').M. i1. tc.,3 ~13 .M')>e Ah' ' 1" 4'yW f .x :ck... - c. w r.c < v +~ g ~ .;\\{\\)t)Rf J.'sf D A C) S g * * $ A~gn kw.u d'*. uh.fo ' fr"" k.ek.ag.m'b'.W 3 Sm p Rc, R,e O 4y& 91, pas.3 ~d44~ tl M.j. /w n Tily cw wid p;u, g s;t59 iv 3 $f ~ 4 '.,g.t h -u.W oNw g.' j f g [ G. w W ~e k ca8. fh,+ - - l's x' c.. : i,3 3{3 ,.y 4.,,..r, a'& f-D

.s. s + y --

5)tpf,... :,.c..,,, V. }r,isJ/Ccti.w A 2 i.. %'. J..s Neg : 1" o eJ A ~ t=":d'n y 4

s. G.4. h A~.,.

n-u re p, 3 Q a, \\ \\ % I!- 'L

t. d. x.. v -
s,..

b' t:C U..\\... ah3 . - 3. gr., ,iy. -j s, [,, g.t.,. 4.. E. 4 <. \\

  • t:

\\ \\ *..- 1 Copy sent to Section Head ,;, gy.l g. pg 'v-. )

m '. 6 ' ._Qy Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation '(- 777 East Eisenhower Parkway A. ' Ann Arbor, Michigan - ma tamss:P.O. Box 1000, Ann Ardor, Michgan 48106 MEETING NOTES NO. 901 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY BECRTEL JOB 7220-101 DATE:- December 4,L1978 PLACE: Midland Jobsite

SUBJECT:

Meeting with CPCo and NRC Regarding' Settlement Problem- ,for Diasal Generator Building and Other Structures FILE: 0279, C-2645 ATTENDEES: _Bechtal C S.S. Afifi W.L. Barclay J.P..Betts A.J. Boos B. Dhar W.F.-Ferris-Y.K.-Lin- ~. A.S. Marshall P.A. Martinez B.C. McConnel C.L. Richardson-M.O. Rothwell N.-Swanberg' K. Wiedner Bechtal ^CPCo Consultants NRC W.R. Bird - C.J. Dunnicliff R. Cook. -T.C..Cooke (Instrumentation) G. Callagher -D.E. Horn. R.B. Pack (Soil) D. Gillin g C.A. Hunt-L. Neller v-D.B. Miller D. Hood D.E. Sibbald -R.M. Wheelar 4 STilM 4A. (S Skr 7 Appendix B

+ b-Meeting Notes No. 901 f.4 Page 2 I e ATTACHMENTS:

1) Me=o to S.A. Varga, Chief, light Water Reactors Franch No. 4 from D. Hood, Projcet Manager, Light Water Reactors Branch No. 4
2) Agenda for Meeting with NRC at Midland on 12/4/78
3) CPCo letter Serial CSC-3663 dated 12/7/78
4) List of Documents Presented in the Meeting PURPOSE:

The purpose of the meeting was to inforni the NRC of the status of the settlement problem of the diesel generator building and other structures at t,he Midland plant. from the NRC states their purpose for the meeting. Attachment 2 was adopted as the agenda for the meeting. c SITE VISIT: The participants from the NRC except G. Gallagher, accompanied by Bechtel and CPCo representatives, visited the diesel generator building, service water.pumphouse, condensate tank foundations, retaining walls for cooling pond, tank farm (including borated water storage tanks area), and . radwaste bsilding at the Midland plant site on December 3, 1978. ITDiS DISCUSSED: 1) History Bechtel presented a brief description of the plant arrangement and settlement monitoring program. The heavier Category I and Category II structures like the containment bulidings and the major part of the auxiliary and turbine' buildings, are founded on glacial till, the natural soil. Also located on glacial till are the major part of .the service water pump structure (Category.I) and other Category II pump structures. The settlement of these structures are within the predicted range and did not cause any problem. The rest of the plant structures, both Categories I and II, are ~ founded on plant area fill. The Category I structures are a part ~ of the auxiliary building, i.e., loading bay, the diesel generator building (DGB), part of the service water pump structure, and the underground emergency diesel oil tanks..The settlement monitoring.- program indicated that the settlement of the DGB was greater than-

expected.

It was reported under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55e due to the magnitude of investigative tests and the required analysis-of. test results. The~available settlement data of the DGB was then reviewed'. It was ~ noted that when the ductbanks were separated from the DGB, the east end of'the building settled by approximately 2 inches, whereas there was no significant settlement at the west.end. Bechtel .( attributed this difference in: settlement to the absence of any deep vertien1' duct bank at the west end of the building.-

r r Pn _,2 Heeting Notes No. 901 E de

  • Page 3 e

e ? r a r 2) Soil Exploration j n B f Af ter the settlement problem of the DGB was observed, an extensive j subsurface investigation (e.g., soil boring program, dutch cone T penutration tests, and various laboratory tests of soil samples) M H was performed to evaluate the plant fill. The results of the tests { . indicated soil properties.which varied.from poor to good. Bechtel has not pc investigated the causes of the problem because { .their attention has been directed toward cofracting the situation g as quickly as possible. However, the consultants, Dr. Peck and Dr. ._g i Hendron, were asked this question at a meeting in Urbana on November 7, 1978. The following is a brinf summary of Dr. Peck's response. a. The fill is of very variable quality, but the records of fill placement do not support this. + b. It may be difficult, and maybe even impossible, to find out s j the causes for this variability. 2 c. It could be due to-d ] 1. Variability of the soils in the backfill (there are both g sands and clayey sands). The NRC has already mentioned ( this in one of their letters. f 7 2. The fill may have been placed dry of optimum, and became 3,...- { saturated as the water tabIe rose when the cooling pond n g was filled. Had measurements of change in water table and settlement been available, it might have been possible ] to evaluate this. ] E i 3. This initial fill may have been satisfactory, as the = 7 record shows, but the excavations for duct banks, piping, 3 I etc may not have.been.so well backfilled because most of } that work would have involved hand compaction. ] J. 4 d. Most fills are not homogeneous and this is not always found 5 out. In any case, why the fill got to this state is now T irrelevant to the problem of correcting the situation. m The NRC emphasized that the office of inspection and enforcement 5 believed causa determination to be mandatory to preclude repetition 3 of a similar problem. l 3) Consultants' Recommendation q j E a. Soil Consultant Dr. R.B. Peck stated that bearing capacity was k not a problem but settlement is the real problem. The corrective action must limit future settlement to an acceptabic degree. 2 Hence, proloading of the entire area was recommended as a _3 means of consolidating the fill. j J Y ^"

Msteing Notes No. 901 Pagn 4 i i The data from the instrumentation ir. the soil would help to indicate when satisfactory consolidation had been achieved. It is anticipated that a major part of settlement should occur rapidly as the area is being preloaded. The actual time required for desired consolidation would be difficult to predict at this time. b. Instrumentation Consultant C.J.~Dunnicliff described the soil instrumentation an'd the monitoring ~p' ogram for concrete cracka. r Soil movement and variation in pore watpr pressune at three different elevations in the fill' will be measured by Borros anchors and piezometers. Width of existing cracks in the ~ walls will be monitored at four selected locations by specially designed electrical strain gages. ~ 4) Status Report Bechtel provided a status report of the activities for resolution of the problem. The soil boring program has been completed, and soil samples have been sent to the' laboratory of Coldberg-Zoino-Dunnicliff & Associates. The four vertical electrical duct banks entering the DGB were separated from the building foundation to allow free movement of the building. The following activities are in progress: / a. Foundation settlement monitoring b. Construction of the DGB structure to add loads to the existing < foundation ,,.,e c. Preparation for placing surcharge in the DGB area The future activities planned are: Place surcharge in the area as recommended by the consultant. a. b. Raise the ground water table by raising the pond elevation to the highest operating level. Monitor the selected utility in and around the building. The c. NRC expressed their concern for additional loads due to surcharge, on existing utilities like condensate lines. d. Verify the structure and utility integrity after surcharge operation is complete. e. Investigate other Category I structures on structural fill. \\. f. Review and modify the FSAR as required to reflect as-built conditions. L

Page 5. w . J '. r 5) Schedule C- .Bechtel presented key schedule data for the project. Composite j ~- project coupletion at the end of November 1978 was approximately 58% (engineering 86% and construction 54% complete). Unit 2 hot functional is scheduledto begin in 19 months (July 1, 1980). Fuel load is scheduled 4 conths later (November 1, 1980). The earliest requirement for completion of the Unic 2 diesel generators (two i cells out of four) was. January 1980 in order to provide backup Protection during cold hydro. The present completion requirement is March 1980 to provide backup protection to'the reactor coolant pumps during hot functional tests. The late completion schedule requirement. consistent with the overall project schedule is under study. The approxi= ate date will be June 1980. sauming resolution of turbine building basement wall support requiremenes by December 8, 1978, placement of surcharge materials beginning on January 2,1979, and a 5-month consolidation period, a g potential delay of 2 to 3 months to the present requirement of a g March 1980 completion date is anticipated. Preliminary investigations q indicate that a late requirement of June 1980 to support the fuel y load schedule could be met. Ihe NRC stated that, per the present schedule, the safety evaluation report (SER) will be issued by ] June 1979, based on information received 2 months prior to that s date. A supplement to tha SER will be issued 2 months after the original issue. It appeared that the present forecast of the ( diesel generator building problem resolution was consistent with the SER issue dates. 6) Responses to the NRC Inspector's Report Dated November 17, 1978 The open items in the NRC inspector's report were discussed. It d was agreed that conflicts identified in agenda items VII(a), (1) through (4) will be resolved by Bechtel, and FSAR changes will be incorporated as required. It will also be verified whether there 'E is any conflict between PSAR commit =ents and the FSAR. ] Questions regarding Specification 7220-C-210 (Agenda Items VII(a), h (5) through (7)) were discussed. The NRC clarified 1. hat, in addition .e to a i2% tolerance in moisture content, they were concerned whether the material being tested was related to the appropriate proctor. 3 Because of a wide variation in soil properties, an error in celecting i a proctor curve could result in a large variation in compaction. a It was agreed that a written response to this NRC inspector's j report would be provided by Bechtel/CPCo. 2 2 7) Ccmments from NRC j The NRC indicated that this settlement problem would likely be included in the public hearing for the operating license of the j k Midland plant. The NRC considered the preload program to be an _r experimental method. However, the licensee can proceed with the a i

' [*

  • Mesting Notea Na. 901
  • Page 6 preload program at its cwn risk. The results of the consolidation will be reviewed by the NRC before acceptr.nce.

It must be demon-strated that the original requirements of the construction permit had been met or exceeded. 8) Remarks from CPCo ~ CPCo has su=marized their remarks to the different agenda items in their letter to Bechtel, Serial CSC-3663 dated December 7, 1978 (Attachment 3). ACTION ITEMS: Bechtel 1) Bechtel agreed to provide the NRC with a list of j Construction equipment which was utilized for compacting the fill from el 618' to el 628' in the diesel, generator building. Bechtel 2) All of the. drawings and documents presented in the Engineering / meeting will be sent to the NRC via attachments to Construction MCAR 24 interis reports and the response to the NRC inspector's report dated November 17, 1978. Attach-ment 4 lists all items presented. ( Bechtel/ 3) A written response is to be provided to the NRC CPCo inspector's report dated November 17, 1978. Bechtel 4) The FSAR change notices will be issued as required to resolve conflicts in the FSAR. B. Dhar BD/j s 1/16/5 L. s

1 building cc a ronult of tho 50.55 (c) that w2a filed 2 in September of 1970? 3 A I believe construction had been stopped for awhile 4 and then, I believe, it was decided that -- to con-5 tinue on with construction because it would add more 6 weight to the structure and would facilitate addid 7 tional settlement if additional settlement was going 8 to take place. 9 Q And during'this period of time, from when Consumers to first became aware of the settlement of the diesel 11 generator building, up until this December 4th meeting 12 with the NRC, why was Consumers, if you know, meeting 13 with the NRC during this time period? 14 A Again, it was to inform them of what wa's going on at the site, what our investigation was and what we were 15 finding and also to establish corrective action to 16 be taken. 17 is Q All right. Now, you indicated a moment ago that you had a meeting in-November to prepare for the meeting 19 with the NRC in December, on December 4,1978. 20 I'd like to focus your attention on the 21 meeting that you had in. November of 1973, the pre-22 2 paration meeting. 23 You indicated, and correctly so, that Mr. 24 Go ld asked you about your log for this November meeting 25 5 3572 Appendix C

1 and cna of your log cntrica, 12 thct corr ct? 2 A Yes, he did. 3 Q This is Page ? of 5 of your log of Nova-ber 30, 1978, 4 is it not? 5 A November 30th, yesr it is. 6 Q Now, Mr. Goold drew your attention to one specific 7 line in your log entry, did he not? 8 A Yes, he did. 9 Q He asked you or had you read the sentence" concerning to status report for Bechtel and a line that reads: It " Chuck would state that bcrings are com-12 plete in all areas. Testing is complete for 13 diesel generator building. Also, no settlement in other areas was to be mentioned." g Can you explain what the discussion was 15 at the November 30, 1978, meeting regarding this par-16 ticular portion of your notes as reflected in your 37 18 1092 A The statement "Also, no settlement in other areas was gg to be mentioned," was to be a positive statement. 3 It was to indicate to the NRC that we did not have 21 excessive settlement in other areas-and therefore that was to be mentioned, the fact that we did not have 23 settlement in other areas. 24 25 Q .Now, at your meeting on December 4th with the NRC, was 3573

m 1 tha focus of that macting -- tho diccuncion, I chould 2 say, of that meeting focused on Category 1 structures? 3 A To the best of my recollection it was Category 1 4 structures. 5 Q Can you tell us what was meant or what is meant by 6 Category 1 structures out at liidlan,d? 7 A They are the structures that are considered to be a safety-related, in other words. Also, Q, as we men-9 tioned earlier, Q soils.. They were on'the Q-list and to they are the safety-related structures or equipment or 11 piping or whatever it is that it pertains to. 12 Q Now, you attended the December 4,1978, meeting with 13 the -NRC, did you not? 14 A Yes, I did. 0 All right. And after that meeting did you receive - 15 copies of the notes of both the Nuclear Regulatory 16 Commission and also Bechtel's minutes of that meeting? 17 18 A Yes, I believe, I did. ig Q All right. And let me show you what has been marked as Exhibit 412 and 413 and ask you if you can recognize 20 those for the record. 21 A Exhibit 412 is an NRC inspection report and it's -- 22 in fact, it's really meeting minutes from the meeting 23 24 that was held December 4, 1978, at the site. And 25 the report wcs prepared by Darl cod, the project a 3574

1 managcr at tho timo for NRR Nucionr Agcncy. 2 Q And looking at Exhibit 412, does -- that is the inspec-3 tion report of the NRC meeting of December 4,1978. 4 Does it indicate copies C1 those notes were sent to 5 Consumers and the intervenors, Frank Kelly, Attorney. 3 i 6 General, and others? 7 A Yes. Sent to Frank Kelly, Mary Sinclair, Wandall

s Marshall, and Mr...Howell from Consumers Power Company, g

Myron Cherry, among other individuals. to Q And Exhibit 413, can you identify those? A 413 is,the Bechtal meeting notes for the same meeting, 11 =

12 the meeting that was held December 4, 1978.

13 / .MS ? WOODS: All right. Now, your Honor, y I woEld.mdve for the admission of both of those exhibits., .I would note that Exhibit 413, the Bechtel, 15 b 'L ~ minutes of the December 4 meeting, e.re already con-3,_ ' tai!ied in an exhibit that Mr.'Goold introduced, CPC 37 . 33 1197, but for ease of reference we would simply ask tha.t they be given.a separate exhibit number here 3, _\\;today ' 30 j\\. We would move 412 and 413. s s 21 >4 MR. GOOLD: No. objection as to'412, your. 22 23 Honor. k

  • 24

.. j> 25 s . \\* 3575

J 1 a 9 VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION p 2 83Y MR. GOOLD: 4 3

Q As to 413, Mr. Horn, did you get a copy of DTX 413 g

I 4 at or about the time it was indicated? E= 5 A I'm not sure what time I received s copy of this. f i 6 Q Have you reviewed it for completeness with respect q = 7 to the summary of the meeting before today? M i 8 A I revie,wed only a portion of it. 3M g Q Did you have any problem with the part you' reviewed? A No. to = Q As far as completeness was concerned? l 11 M A No. J 12 Q What portion did you review? 13 ,2 14 A The first sentence on to the history, No. 1 on Page 2 m 15 of the meeting minutes. ] N 16 Q Beginning there, continuing to where? 17 A The two paragraphs there. b 18 Q. Tnat is all of this you looked at? m 19 A Yes. I looked at some of the attachments in the 5 back. 20 = MR. GOOLD: Well, no objection, your Honor. 21 THE COURT: Exhibits 412 and 413 may be N received. 5 23 illi 2 24 (Defendant's E::hibits Nos. 412 and 25 413 were received in evidence.) i = 3 3576 l . 2. ; y - .x ?.~.~ l l A

r I f ( 1 CROSS-E*LU1INATION (Continued) C 5 2 SY !!S. WOODS: r; 3 Q Now, tir. Horn, you had the meeting on November 30 to prepare for your December 4th meeting and you were ] 4 5 -- and you ran through what would be discussed with 6 the NRC. 7 In looking at the minutes of the December i 8 4, 1978, meeting with the NRC, I'd first like to draw 9 your attention to the minutes 6f the NRC, E:chibit 10 412. h I 11 On Page 1 of those minutes does it indicate 44g 12 the structures that were discussed at the meeting? 13 A 'It indicates the history of the structures on the first 14 page under No. 2. 15 Q And what structures were discussed at the meeting? ~ 16 A The containment, borated water storage tank, diesel 17 generator building and pedestals, au: ciliary building, - 18 service water intake, 19 Q And in looking at Page 2 of the NRC's minutes of the f December 4th meeting, was the NRC provided with any 20 information on December 4th as to the status of 21 E settleEent at these various Category 1 structures? 22 k 23 A es, their -- as was indicated on the second page of L [ 24 the notes. 25 0 And what was the liRC told on December 4, 1973, regarding. i 3577

i l 1 these Category 1 structures? 2 A Containment was between a quarter of an inch to five-3 eights of an inch over a year and a half. Auxiliary 4 building, approximately one-eightn of an inch and 5 the central portion. Service water pump structures, 6 zero to one-eighth of an inch. And diesel generator e 7 building, three to four inches since footing was a poured October 1977 and walls :in the spring of 1978. 9 Q 'This settlement information that was contained -- to 10 the NRC' in December, in the December 4,1978, meeting, 11 was Ulat the result of any settlement monitoring 12 progran that had been instituted out at the site? 13 A Yes, there was a settlement monitoring program that g had been instituted at the site. 15 0 And when did that settlement monitoring program begin? 16 A I believe it began on some of the structures in 17 1977-18 Q What began in June of 1973 as shown in.the NRC minutes is regarding the settlement monitoring program? Do you recall? 20 A Some of the other structures may have began in '78. 21 Q All right. Now, utilizing.,also, to refresh your 22 recollection, the Eechtel minutes of exactly the'same 23 24 meeting, the December 4th meeting, that is ?nhibit 25 413, was there any discussion as to other structures 3578 m1.,.. ,;_..r.n

,.-
w.

,~ ...u.

I and cottlement potential of othcr structuras et ths 2 Midland site in the December 4th, 1970 meeting with 3-the NRC? 4 And let me draw your attention to Page 2 5 of the Bechtel minutes, Nh4 bit 413. 6 A Yes.' It talked about the Category 1 structures and -7 also Category 2 pump structures. 8 Q And~what information was told to the NRC on December 9-4, 1978, regarding the settlement of these structures? 10 A Settlement of these structures are within the predicted 11 range and did not cause any problem. 12 Q. And is that what you and the others discussed with ~13. Bechtel during your November 30 meeting in preparation 14 for this December 4th? 15 A I believe so, yes. 16 17 18 20 71. 22-1 23 24 . 25 3579 -~.-r-r--- m. w

1 Q Nsw, Mr. Goold asked you some questions when he was 2 asking you about this December 4th meeting and he asked l 3 you whether or not at the meeting there had been any 4 discussion of the chlorination building, of the ~ 5 transforme~r pads, specifically. 6 Prior to the December 4th meeting", we saw a 7 moment ago in your log that you had attended a meeting 8 on October 25th, 1978 in which there had been some 9 discussions -- and you just told us about 'em -- of 10 varicus structures on the site, including the 11 transformer pads and the chlorination building; is that 12 correct? 13 A yes. 14 Q Now, Mr. Gallagher, you've also told us, did not attend 15 this meeting on October 25th. Did you ever discuss with 16 Mr. Gallagher the topics that went on during this '17 October 25th meeting? 5 . k 1 18 " A I believe I discussed the -- this particular meeting x19 with him on October 27th. 20 ' 0 All right'. And, in fact, your log for October 27th 21 indicates, does it not, that on that date you went Z2 through your notes that we just took a look at from the 23 October 25th meeting. You we$t through them with Mr. 24 Gallagher? 25 A Yes, I did. S 3580

1 Q That was approximately six weeks before the December 2 4th meeting; is that correct? 3 A Yes. 4 Q Now, after the December 4th, 1978 meeting, did the NRC 5 advise you and Consumers that it was going to begin an 6 investigation out at the diesel -- out at the Midland 7 site? 8 A Yes. Mr. Gallagher came in with a Mr. Jerry Philip from ~ 9 NRC and advised us that they were on an investigation to of the settlement of the diesel generator building. - 11 Q .And as reflected in your log for December lith, what ~12 transpired with the NRC regarding this investigation? 13' A Well, they began interviewing many people from the site, 14 many people -- and that included field engineering, U.S. r 15 Testing personnel,-Bechtel QC, I believe Bechtel QA and ~ .Bechtel fiel'd engineering, I believe they even 16 17 interviewed a foreman of Bechtel. f 13 They interviewed Consum -- possibly, Consumers' 1g people. They did not interview myself directly, b; l although they did ask me many questions. I did not; 20- ~ consider'it to be an interview, closed-door sessions - 21 like they had with the other individuals.. 22 They interviewed personnel in Ann Arbor. L 23 There were -- I thin ~k there was at least one or two 24 -25 trips to Ann Arbor interviewing project engineering-c

- s... m l+. -l....- : n v........ .l.. : _ >en .+. .V_ W '... 1 5-t_ cS C.,=. e m::2 E.is.;;;s.%.55=w..o w.m,0fc-. a - -,- r i Inter.ctisce Memc.anc;.:m ~ f 3 10-

  • 0!.7
ste
  • anuary 13, 1878 To-J. 7. Nevge=

From R. L. Cas.labe:Ty (EE Sciec Y.idla=d 71a== U=1:s 1 & : ~ C,,;";,,,1 V 1 a n Job 7220 h' I:518871:3 r i w 4.::szic S.. # ' 'd

  • g

<a Tou=datic= Se :le=e=: At An= Arbor casies to !=vestiga f.o= .:^.1 6,.:! w T!le: 0271., C-1700, c'-2500 E' '. C'3"O

5. L. 31me w/o E* *"-!"U.

,r- --d

7. E. Meyer w/o
7. A. Mar.1=e v/c f-

--- -==- A:: ached for your use is a copy of a report c= :he above subjec. u ish was prepared by the Ceo:ea'. '-=1 Services dep4===e=:. n. I: is 7:= ject I=gi=es=6ss understandi=g tha:.his c==ple:es ou: participatio= i= the subjec: i=vestiga:1o=. SwJWN g

1. L. Castlebe==y CA*/sg i::a.3=e==

"a 1. w\\ s

  • p,,o

'l'&* ,,.a. p.- ( 1 v',l.%: '. $ . \\. \\,,e.... - i. .:.... c. 1...... \\,. m g\\ . r .c..... 1a r,

  • . :.-.. s 90517269.1

.m

.h eh 1 w 3 m.W 4 Assc :A".Z5 ysc77,332csa cc72C?.AncN w -v-'_* 2CT A5D Pxc cc:s 1 & 2

c3 72
0 J

..r. s An W sAAnc. 3 C 33 9 Tc0X::Anc3 SI-. DfEOS .. Atesa c:a L:::: 0. t- - g=, r.=. W ..~---.-:-- ..... n n.--- h' t s. Prepared by:. wi.wfi,r.. 4 CR 53:{- Decacher, 1977. n.'i. 90517270 1 -3 6-Ms, m..*..

4-.;... , ~ _..,. _ _ _, . _.. _. =. _.. x k ..4. a..:;haarhr. :s 6 Sep a=her,1977, we vers rea.ues:ed by p::j ee: O. f Ei=17 is. avievi=g condi: ices su =oundi=s foo.h ; sa::Is=en:s durh ; s-assis: diss. The f=unds-cons==uctism of. the Ifidland y=j ac: Ad=1=is=a:1:= Icil "he affac:ad 1 his build 1=g is shown h 71gv.:= 1. 4 . tion location pla= is:

  • s
s foundatic=a a=a those alsn Calu== lisa 0.4.
  1. 3, 1

..f. The followi=g da.a are p:ssanted.s snabis c==s::ve: ion and a= gh 4 i evalua:i=g tha sat:1 ament of thasa fso:i=gs. .d t i= j' f . ~1 uCza a g;sund at the Midland si:a was at approx 1=a:aly tieva: J. The or.=' Af:argrou=dsurfaceprah d '3 the vici=1:7 of the ad=i=is=ation build 1=g. t i= C avatina 634 An arazio.. plant area f"i was placed to avproxi=stal7 -i data cons =uc-excavatica vas la: : =ada to about neva:1on G10 so acco==e 1-j Figure 2 shows a c:ssa-see i== of tha ::.:= mal - ..3.on of the stea= ru==el. Af:a; cons==us:1cn of the : -% 5i m 5 ~.,... ~~ and the appro=i= ate excavation sche =e. -- ~4 sida of.he tu=nal a==ava:icn was backfilled to appro '.=a:e '1 the vas: the fou=da.1:ss al==g Cel.= n 7.ise 0.4 of the

D Eleva: ion 620 :s co=s:=ue:

.3* Af:a; found=1cn cons===:i==, the re ahdar of a> d- n=ratica hn'W 3 . 3. ' ' d show:. is Tigure 2. the excavation was b=^*"ted with sa=d :s gra a as. .t ..j ..} of Septa =ber, Cae:ach was nada awart of sa::le=cr.:s .s. b .h rhg the sa:1y par: i. . 'j Tha sat: lament data a:a given.in Tabla 1.' - ' * }g,. ale =3 the Colt =n Li=e O.4. ~ 3 ...... ' " ' ' ' ~.' '. ~.'.. * * *...', ~ .. T.' '.'., C ' *.* ' '.'m' "'.C'.1'. .~ d l.......... h = bg tha week.of Septa =her.19-23, 1977.several si:s rev by angineeri=g. cons:Tue:ium, and Cen:ach perro== . J.. : . ~....... .m.,.d...........'...-...................................... ..ig' - l L

  • 90517271 g

T. t,M g ~ ./ and af:ar the ra=sval of :he subjec: footings. y'

vas nc ad tha: :he s=il unda :nd 1

Upon c=2 val of Colu== 3 0.4, 6 f _1 tis was confi=ad by pushing a 3/4"'s::a1 E adja:a==== 1: vas sof:. i=== tha ground,by walki=; barwithb.::laaffc: app:c=i=a:aly :wo faa 12:i=s, and by push 4=g. of a on the soil a=d notd=3 1:s spcagy charac: : .p shoval vich 11::la affc :.. 1 l,

  • 0.4 included noisen== con-
  • l*as:s taha= at tha: ti=a i= nad adjace== to E.

"'hasa :sses also va:a :skas 'l ta==, density, and u=cesfi=ad es=p;assion. ..7 a: Caiu== Q,0.4. ~

  • 4 4

., j) these field obss va:i=ns, i: van dacided tha: two bori=ss she'd A ba Af a: =kan :o fv. :har evalua:a the condi: ions along Cs1=== T.ina 0.4. .A

  • *2 i
ha: al' affse:ad footi=ss 1=s, 3ac.h:a1 Cons===:Lon's dedis on was.

A: ha: ...,i ~ Ei .wa, - - 'ba ra=oved. -.- .a .q ~, - g-3::?.'7G5 foo:i=gs Cn Septa =bair 27 and 23,1977, :vo :ss: borings vara ce=pisted a ~ Ta:ics :as:s (5?"') .2 I., At foo:d=g ~II 0.4, s:andard pene: _13 0.'4 and p"1 0.4. foo:ing E 0.4, standard penetrazi==, . : J-*1 .c A: -; *l and shalby tubes (ST) vara :skan. i ) 'I. i

sses va:a takan.

8 ..s t. 3eri=;s included v :ual !==paction and descripcian of soils, 0.7 :s d

. i by :!:e. cke: pene: o=sta =athed) and any A

(es=p::szive s::c:..; : c=edi:1ons (icsh"c: gzia). visual observaticas of v : : s 1., 1 e 90517272 - \\ r__ ?,_ : --- w. I ] ~ _J ~ D

\\ .h 49 b t as shova is log of holas, HE .f

ss:i=3 ve:e also ::he:

sa=plas for p;=c:o j[ i ..,..,, an,a m...n. .a loss are shova on Tiguras 3 throu;h 7. "he hori=3 a. sG ?!CGZAM U. C. Tas:1=3 Shelby tubes.aken from 3eri=g !.3 vara sub=i::ed to Labora=ory for u= confined co=pressive tests. -a foundazio=s 7A 0.4 and T.*f 0.4 vers also ta>== by T. Sa plas taka= a: made. Rasul:s of 1 ~ Tez. ins person =al and unconfined co=pressio= tests vote 5

ss is a:s given.1= Tabla 2.

t t 2 4 k n direc=17 ~ 1: vas also decidad := run ? ocro :sses e= ths.sa=plas ta e 't ,4-

o de:ar=1:e the s==dard to be

~ } to foo:iass in o:da u=da: and adjaces: co=ps=:1o These resul s ara

  • I used in calcula:Ing the is si:u ps :an:

t l uHij "sund is Tiguras 8, 9,,,and.10 . s '* 7 h i= si:n pe==en: The 7:octor cu -re i= Tigure 8 was used to calcula:a t e " bis-4,, a t ds=si:y' da = raper:nd, by the Tiald. s. .i. co=paction usi=g :he is situ d=7 .s. . l. 3 vi:h the per.e== co=paction p;sviously. ~ i=for=a: ion is ce= pared in Figurs ce= pac: ion was i= all l shows tha: the perca= "his compa: iso: s sported. ~ [

ha= thac 7:sviously deter ined.

cases lova

  • ~ ~ -

s d pe== ant compac: Lod on the

. S.

to illus::sta the effec: of a redu=s In ords: Za:io (CTI) tes:s previout i s::c=gth of soil,; he data of California 2 ear ng ils are prese=:cd i 713 l zado on-three idsn:io:1 s==;1:s of the Midland so i thras levels of campaction af fert, whit .s - The sa=ples. vere conpac:cd a: 11. 90517273 + N - =r- -- -i = 4 ....~.L. . -. ~. -.

dib5.G ive ans:;,.as o 56, con ' 'b/*-

  • 20,000 f:-lb/f

, and _,,g; ed is es=;ae: f,s . -.. - 5 e p r es sur e values ic: ,, se g:.lb / '.3, :sspe :ively..:,s ses -w2 n dry densi:7 :sduced f - M.5 ;si to - i a pent::sti = c,,,.3.. a. -g g ;,2,.d -- f C' U ' h es=;ac.ive ener:;y f::= 36,C f:-it/f 5 ps, by.adu '. *ht =- 4 3 j f:-lb/ft. 1 i 2 1 c::::Moti

o tha sdjec:

ad o= availabla data. :ha =a:arial unda: sed adjacan: g,,.A gs, (Ilava-is: 612-622) had insufficias: bea:ht ca CM*N# ,j ha fou=da:1u=s. z s l d= pas:2n DM M W" ha backfilled ocha; tha= ha so' SK be:ings.a=d es=p:sss M m u. and his cc:t, us,= , s,ss.,,o-ad bv. ~ s.

4..

3 4 ~' a.- =.2 .M L2.1 =... F =.- ,j .j * .i '.i. am, e . 'l. .E

  • O.,$

8 3 h

  • 4 g.

.1 t e sJ 9 517274 ~ .F'- 1

y-s

sp_,

1 / s' Ad=i=is::::1:n 3uilding 'a 3c1:s for cel. line o,: A=cho TCP 3c1: Ilev. c34' 1/*" y- ] Far N g egi, g,y, 3,,, 7 t-T The Calu==s==d C =da 3ea= For Col m Line 0.4 Shows Se: la=s== Ps; As 3u11: Zieva isms Takan 8-23-77 A. 4 .i. Colu=n_ Eleva: ion se::le,,.: ( f-l 4 Ps 634.10 0.11 s* 7 i N 634.03 0.17 g t M 634.01 0.20

  • 1 p

634.05 0.16 1 g 0.19 s I 634.02 5 7 633.93 0.23 1 K j, 3 0.23 J. 633.93 l.

0. 29 e.

F._ 633.92 .c e 1 e c._,.=.. n 1 4 3 e j i .e

  • .e

-1.s r 1 .' *i,. i. 1 1 .g ...=\\ l 4 I 11 ( .a. t. .4 90517275 5 S I' i i 1 .. n r

\\ g" ! o. w ri ll _ // u ./' w ' E. r, i P. t E L v f C C W C c. c. C. e y e c c. C. C C N c. C. N N U ~ n .e. U R C C 4 C m N W L A h.* m I M E es = >- sem ) I. au = S C 2, . =w = ~ 3 '= =e C e. = M M M N N = ~ ~ e ) W W N O h gg } U . C. s. M < n.e. e z .s o.c M4 = e =. t. v. v u u e = a e e m* a e e m M = = o e r . "u m# a, a y e e e = 5 e C 9 6 = = e s e e a e = i c,o n m m m 3 r. a = u a.

  1. =

e x v = c C

==t Q_ m. c. i. z u I e* = t c u t, e = .m .= =.c .= 2 v e., e. o. o. O. 9,, 9 9 9 9., . ~.,.. -.. - 3 C w oE E ,',I ~ ~ e c = ~ 4 =. - C 4 .3 hh "e 0 '.. j us 0 4 e. T. = j C m g 1 .o 2 e C C. C. e c 2 M u c G C. C. C. g .a .ae a = 3 I i g i w w w k 8 o o o o O w 4 4 9 m a a a m 4 4 8 n m m. n. = = = 7 . S,. 6

  • ~

t#3 4mJ ?. f. f y m a a e ~c R f' m m ... = I l V. s I.

    • g 90517276 s

.3 - f at. i g ^6'

U4Pw [ Q m e o o J 11 - 1 g. o % / I to g ~. L ]' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ _ _ L _ _., ; I,f e ,m er 1; .w*. A_ 4 f Ii l t s. E

  • 8 g

..s..: r.. ......t es ".=_1 a

  • S,' I. '#. d!. <

I I I I g mi g. l, g g 3 ".. T +. k 6 's 8 as g g ~

  • = *d ii :.'.

. : +Q* *** a j w 8 a s, Is 8 8 g 8 { .*. e. m,.-- s3 II up ~ It 3 .e. ss. .i 4 t. n,

  • I a I 8 i 9

4 e. I IA N w T ,i .i iv a

  • =_c lp

[8 8 g ~l 3 ' l, gg 1 i i: l ,s 5 ,.a I( p;E -~ y - a,, ' i g f. -} l T l's'i .e m ~~ c c l'i" = gi i, i 8 ii =.

  • =4

{ u a I I 8 e a l i, g E i,l g g,I s n a = ~ g = m n 5 1, I L" l i 5 H i, 8 j ~ v e a 1I .] $. p

  • s la e.

3 3 1 a a 6 s I ~ = U

(

M = y c ra = t,8 3 r< = .C s -.+ I ciEE. c g g = E t - hi=, S c. 2 gi l

I C

'f. ?. 6 .,_.,_g! !T-

t. I.

-l s

  • e'T 'I ~

2 l, -) '"" J I" It g M l'T* 'I I{ ] I*8 g t. 8 .,t 4 e t. 1 I 1:l 1 I i: I I - $bSE

4 l-8 A l f n e- -

la II . ~. $ e f x II CW_'t.h g e W.re...t. i. 6 t ei. 5 i M l 1' M@? 'a 1 ^ 1 gl 3 m '. ' j i! .p* :is; I e I s gI , v s t. 3 Is 4 - I [. n.

=== 1 y 3, m-I I --) a I ja. l ,i. s sl .? e Is ! l'__ _ l._.... _ _ _., _,.t _ 3 Y. .. _ ~ .2 i- ~l = i 2 ,s- ,,3 , s-r., n 'l.. O (~l l '.1 =

.5'.!

e ~- .L._

l .. O q' 4 fs e t d.;_ mfi. a .a.dnIg i r. .y . w s,g.. w :d;,..j t .t ,...il ,aSw..;. 2 W ..y e .g r 's u 1 r, t T t F s N A. { s i t s P y. i.' y .k. s A /- 3 H l s i, l 4 ,s l s g i ' 0 g

a. '

i 8 tn: .*.s E i I l

s. I.

T s I I A

n. G L TH 3

4 n t Sl # a ~ NDl i s s l L t. o I l.g g t 4 l 1

5. n ' l.

s s nt 1 i i g 4 c A. n 8 = 3. } i n 8 [ u P s l I .f,.. r ~ A n /. l l I.l\\. .g ML lil I f.' 1 0

  • 3I 1 2 2 L

.e 't' 6 6 l h i s d e. LL T s L

  • E. E N

a. A E 1 o. L H 2 P F.s:w: a H" c 1 i 6 U G g L m.s. 1 T i, A s. r H nv.3t 1 L. -tr, o l s, G ! t. l gs,. i n ,, o R. T. i t r a1 i s r o s t.r 1 E p- $ c. O) wnm I. C S a lj i . 't . I-t l l .l

- 5. __ _ _ _ -- - L. - ~ ~ - - - --~~~ W ~.- L-tr3. & sg,(sORING LOG mmao acce em euar 7z:., /f. l.=== l. ---...AP?a'sF. z' ? oF Foa tw$ G D.4-f.g l....-~....* W+ e.a " ~~)p, tints r)ra r:0A> 8!.D ?. ,S o = l n= F... u.. ..............,.....i a 3 h. '.7 .?/Z *il77 Z/NGLC7bdbEEL C'I'.b CMC ~SS C S'l l l __ -- - M /z-/7 .. =.. l /2 &22.o (.$EE Na t*s: c:4.,k..._,.. _ = _....,..... _ y /4 o~*/ /8 " l No^/ E~ s/D2=4.')' B. 4,/:/.;N5 .5 n,.rre. vie " 8"5 (

=

.a

  • . r* ::

1. L 3 4 3 : .s g, g., q.

i "l

I I I 1 I-1 Ic.za _J j P&l l' " '7 ' 7e.W' "~< -** * **a*L.)l.:r "s u <. ~, ~c I * ~ -.t ~' t t.s * \\ ~ t-I-l-c t2.5 E *i.:.<... L1 s. :t, s '.c,n..,' ? em'.:.r < *. - v cco 'ss,n e. : 3 .=- s e n >'.r.d::' \\c.it - l-l~l-W** / >ip m '= r* < <rr'-* c.4,<a n,,,;v z z., z.o ". *

  • rn 4

i%7'.13.S* Zstows:stdi-To /"ft Ols!/* d*5A$r!Cs 77 J,AMC ( M * ' d* ', AEL L E.A 'LhsstS II.c t 3S I si s 13 t 2 7. t M/ Gorby CP/46,, /Ym

    • ' * ** CA -
2 i

>.N.o 3 E"5't.S

  • lf!".* l J 7 i /J t 17 l a c

/,5 8*E' 1 /' ',5la',Lansc Cass (I22nr r:,122) ja",,. ~ ;] R. k~:p1' s' c' l - l - l l-f

  • *g
f..Z dNCAL.* EIN SAHO f, niss".l i*

e

a..

s., m.= v.e s - l - l - s - 'y, /C.S* / " 3 ;** N c. ' ',,, g g [SC/Z nG.51 2s t10 l 14. I I t. / g n

m. n, a.

a r.-. ~ he / t = lead. rA P i E'.-::'.s'so :n J i ei7 e n., s is M"g*..!g sent. ru n .M Q :x.

  • g ran a.

,su sa :

q.,

?E '? hf'Ti::' lt.7') ~ ?.'- 1.C ' 2 riss l-l - l.-. \\ G-.$ %..p ;1.C. 2sas*.s c' In : sue is rocar:.s::rs.ete-o-LL: U2 .l d qpu.* s.:.:.s wl..y:=s s'- c., s' ~>'~sc csar:,.ar i %.s,.: n, : =ce.- e an a,,.. = , c. ,: aa, a, - 7... p :(:s.s,. i pgY.g,\\. g._. ;.,,,,,. -Ji' .sduo.sceav f r acs2:t *J qp.m.*

  • i., '-

ca r 8 ne co Is.n r Anc.s ius"- s f . ET5e t.$, 2 %*t 10 t 4; SCSS g g y,p 94:ro C*t.).~ A 3 tL 4'.s fort p .gWP "' .; w - H ' sr12 ' l/.s'l - l - l - l ,SS3.c d ~#'- N E - g ; -.31.Ja* 4A*vai +,,hg.,;t,c rec #'"A.s YI7at',Lg' fj, y g' ' ~~' ' ' ".ss'a.# .m" * *d,,,os n a 'n u; ' "'s--

    • s 3.3.' g ~

.M. ~=;r. M: r

  • ~

0; n~.tsu e no.=\\ 1. a n.e n,o il.w=',f$f.G.,2.Mef.1.'; w.*ws.'w=*n m~<. ~ one to s. sop)% q.s :. I ll t s .n V c.so.sn-a,t.:wur :ca c c.::,9,yd)y7Na r N y,h. ,-24 M, l.."**=* ' ~ * *

  • e I G.'i.... s.

M e~....e=.s.Jw~**ra.y iso. m.- ,f.-._ r

  • asi.

r-:,w.,< nr, ~- am:: f ? is Mt.L':Jnu : s. =- eL 'i;1L #::.:: r (s #. % >It o,oizO' vgt:,.t pcn:1:, .- 2 s.: *..n.:'s eic c.ourwr.4 y g ? *,4-N's: : d.. ', a #. wG--f:.5 ~ C72.s*

.',.'.e } ' p* -=

'.') ?.a = L A

aa.
  • :. : v '.~st = 4 5. S s y O $?" I ft,,. 30;*~2sM'* S'15.3*

I

'n dt! Na q Pos.'t t.2 a

na c r nasuc. I a sour-u.szi .~ tsina:) 1 e,ue. :.. i s. n u.- u sin e. H .a - 9001~<2~<0 mat a an ~ , n,,, c, ADMlutg7.,y,,;,, o 8:.y g:,, =. - ,.. ~. j.,, y _J..f 88079 4 M

\\ \\ /n. t-1+m.h' (p R'tdif M/DLand **h/?.l.2Ad /! A.y7l g,y 71;o / - t , La,: n 50M1V:._.,, 0 LL,1 b l ....... l..... g.E*= ~ 3:* l

l....2 ' NoA id of ! H i

cily l~57.siagrRArt:d3:.'.. ..... / - lp..../z.c.l77 Etnc,:,. 7:.J0:ELDRr.] CMC-54'c l $~" -- l - S ni ~ gj:a .~.. \\ (C E E R os t "d.w ") l/ l 4 2. v/Et:.<L'l 8. G/ver13 = _... -.. Nong i 1 +//A'

== n cn no i;}

.l. : : :. ::

m - =.- r ~ =

!'ii.
:

i,: c u.

.r euc..ur -

wea i i i i i l gy to -u e ~ o C '~ * * "~ I %.ilz.il - l - l - l - . Q'y l u -: =.< ~~ << = = - r - s wa swi' lfo/T l.'=*Mi*'* c i.7 for.e t des *TM ' $ ' z..e rem - c.ir Tur ene z 2.e..s.'ir7 e.ausinz. o v n,rx.e w sni <.z e n o c.a -a,

v.<
a e.,c.a w,rx s a,,

m ax <.<.~. G.. earu rs .n .Zsgssjt; L: . -a, tN fa. Caix n. ~. ~ . ~... Sp/J. [/IO.8 = f 2 a ? . =. .j 90517280 I g,,u - c... -

.~::..

ssi:,,n:rm nw.e a c,.

= _ _ _.. . ~ -.. - OnrA fa mm.,@RIN G LC G xio u n o a n t e n.' r v a r na ,t-i

Las l

.5 o ' .. l..... w L*

. g.

()../.,,,,i:rp n r a n e Lx.. l.= _... z ' w s.::r os :. n s ...., = R& .D cM e-5c l s" ! I .l .s ' .sj:s/ l... ....,...........'s/:s/n inat.f rw6;.tn.2: g"r s "t. s ~). -... .. ~...... l p l 0 :. (: : Ma :. a/i amt l Jcan y 3. i::ivr.as ~...... mer..ri.- i i! i<::; = = -. --m i.: n... i i. ou

    1. '*V 4 J'Ma*=#"/W
    • g y qf k

l l l l l NM l#' A* T s '; raaa a s a ~ ~ a.. u. c p.;c %>.s k.c] - l - l -l - Wyg;la.s s-umc i 1 a , ra ru o,,.-u s. C*NEA t. 12 ~ 2*L. Bef 7'DN w &ff 7"A*S 1* EE4

  • '=

..S! C's e,,,,,,,s : w org J u. s2p,1pt s, b a, a u. it.u-as e. wiral .s* A n ta c e wer i

s. e.in a

.a i, / N F C. C /- InG ns,-iu 2 i. 1 i / -Q g 9001<281 I f ~ ADl'116:$ra7sq.'tas; 8 y ;;,, ~==.s*

  • =.

v.. . _ ~ _

~Eu"<> ^'au m m"ME.o f7 / l "k. NG LOG l._... .9 a * \\ SO M -H r priist:r.uriw a:.or. l. 4 o'c Foa'wr> v .4 r 50 l 5" l.c= l _ W_ .e/: s l......M s l stau tna Gn.'. Dm& "..! = .:o - ... ~.............. m.. h- [.

l. _.....l to l l c.si Vsce m.-ss cat.)

,9 > ip l..

l......JE.W/ 8. GIVEJVs R.QM

= l naat i+ o+/i s " l

:::.r n.v....

..m ::l.i.i: =* .... d i -s...q ~~

i ! :'. -!

1

'i

= L. L. ~ L

t. : :

s 1;1 c,,g / ' I ;!:@.[ s g,;.,g,,g,4

.~s, ros os i

l i o.it.g*.s s -r(J o*/JM) g31 ggy gg t, 71 (AA CM.Mit l ) Anst,t,~s s'l *' I rm-sa~.rs A>< ?' ~- t t.** F a sen (. m M :' g.a .r o re.wp j. j i o i 1 .e. ; ) W/$,a*!.S"k I l sis.s* I ( .f.(s 44 yiJ, p r. e e ?

4. A_v i,.*/ j'i.f f(demn, s s # 3 w rs t u. ra,,E 's9t.se$ 1**4.s/*f, Q

g g,'$

s. J * = s & '

.1, Il 8 8 I

2. 1O l8j ll : *
  • ** ? 5
  • g ?? K2* V t 751 ~.3*I O.*/.

'l.:5 f.S C.$*I 3' f I \\ 2. I3 _l g, $7 /4Y t.' ] Q y T f, ,,r, ek g 4,g asm,...an,,,n j {r y,z.} Csa)7e r n,:.a, s,rsasus* ps.g:7tc., y y,a g,,,,,, g,,.c; .,: me.w. J.,me 6 iT I s4 J3 i.5'c

  • i

.'s t 3 e 1 e e, s a e at; iJsu.s'u.o's 2 o W # nf' qps 3 ;=g l/ E 4% f W i / ls "' 3 31. V G.5 g ig g ilo g i 7. g to 4

$(,yyp % f,o. c a' i i
  • Q*

2 as u,g.f s w./ &,,:g,ys r.= s.n a vc - : e r s s:t. va -n- .,a . t.;., e, y.,'i s.*>ss r /saf,&*,:*5 *

  • u.s'r'5'

?.SS 5$ \\

  • 7 l.4 l13 \\

f.,,, ( ~ =ff. - s.-s -~ rr sss s '~4 9 1 3.:.%g-Q),1;L 3 .o.>, s a,,.:yop ca,, qs,.gu r c.s.ar,sso ~ ....R ~~~~\\ r ? 3 s* . th:v.r u.:* t zo sto eis sis .f. / t., .vdi]., I .:~17x n g q,n.t .g/ g.: s. f- =~ i i cus nsu.sv.21 io e 2. essc; 3 +/ l YO as Q,3 i

  • .h.

l= J /*r n=4.* T3314.5 Id.7.8 /C I.f l (.a l >n= s s' enc Jr it Q.;rs.,i s. n nd; y & sj, w-s..n [$h )*[.. l + 1

  • f2 *C<t n s e, < A n e.~i.rn ssa, sLita
  • 7 ost

~ ,~ 3 9.::..Ci.5 v u o*. r 1 s t a..- i i s V::11 Sits til i i S 1 e o s 7 s, S o,I (*s.u r t. r$19/ t* ftso) c m I d 7'31"A!. DKP rd: Sa

  • W'A. A

[ a 1 CL. Bor!"GM s f S/. gag-3 D A n.us. 7"d T.!' g s CR rs.L,1t/ c /!.ZTEC Cd$ rH Cc 9 N2VCa. gaa s ,l v/ acts a d en e,,u 9901,1282 - = ' - ] i Y l gt /; op.,,,,,3 7,3,,,,,,,,, y, g, ,.. - =... ~ = .. = $.$$g.g

  • .".A.*

8,,,,,, ~,.. - = -

~8.r.w& n.. .E f t s.( h 1 :.0 t-i H, -...'ou"o "u'we pun? & m,W. NG LCG y. l1 \\ i.o ' ac.e -x c x x::.e x-t ,so-l Q,wr,aa

.sa.

l$"l /?.5 _~~$5,{;I........52/71lSu.6LE~coh!!.'. A"!N CME ~ SCC ~b/ ,2/ : -.......- r..,;..,, W f 7.'.. ~ f lC.3I ($Eni" No!.E //r ) ... ~.. ~.. l. .....t,JEtt.A.'f 8. 6 / Vc*.e s u-......... NoNE N/A l J crmais. W

.,.3

. n- . I: ,--.. - J -- ~~

s :
e a,

j sy z,5 ) 1. ,,a n , y,1 o.it.s~ .5,w o 4isc o st.t.

  • . 4 guc.Ex. Y
    • l*

s /4,f

  • Tb o R

/ sa un g,,_ c odit. ,* s'. 7g; f t. o - Q* "..h * //.[-/ d.f' .aI. Cr/3.5 G

  • M r** ' !" # " Y l 'I' A g.,. -

J7 i ' ~ ~ " Q,l.ry \\ - l - \\ - r-f='Il*S t'G'do, iej.,g.14.4 ~ -q" ;';*; 7~o 77p, O C/T>t * / 4..a ' ~ g l 2 a 7 7 0 '*f ** 4 /f* S. REFER

  • Ta

~ BsRtnh f n a p.,, 1 -~ *' ' i-,h r f.mA.E /N.= c.wasa~r saii. na; w s Ya. ed-2 90517283 - <,::-- '--- iisi.unisri u,,ou si 0 4 h'r'

m1w.

.
:.:. ;.s-........

W II g / /g/jQ C:,. ::: TA-0.4 E ~ l s ,._ } S al T 2,: I ? 293 h 'f R :.-: - ~.~..e,.e.~- e. 9.::. ; : - -2.L - - . - e.~. %.~, g .. 3l... - - 1 us - g l I n.h.- u s-I w I ,,5 I m l =E E. I(10.4) I r se t f*. s 1 I ~ 123 g { I ~.. S } 1 l l ,29 i e n 15 i 7 9 ~~ ~ 5 wx:n,waa.. G) 0 4 ei=s.1-- W, -- P* -.. - ~ vi 14Ss:2 5:d. C.e.a e.4.. " Datt Used_ Caled *:Sd Above US:8 C.-== * :. :~- yaw "*f E C**'**.. _ 4(=sd-m,,s2 us.9 n8-27 5

  • 7 5 94.0 go o z.

.. a== 3

u. C 97 o

'23 g -.,-. .-6 97 7 4

c. ~1.v.d...; -

,a' 4, 5 m2 269 M7 3 10*0 3~,5 p.3 hfh.[* 3 o 970 L.,, 6 u.1

  • 7 16.7 95.7 01-a t
e. 7

.s., .~.-.. o 3I2 II3 u7*g ,5.2 1%a.5 19.5 h-a Los. CUE .i 78.,4.:la* coesac: dans.:7 as data 4-ed f c7 : s ' t.: ' 4 d=7 7 (=sx} " p. 2-conces: 1

  • ~

d '.I ua = Cor:espandi -s 07 i " T (f). riald dry dansW d S C " ea. - no~,. C. esvend* field : mis::: 90517284 . i. a c== 4 0 a* h.h____m_m._____._ _.. -. _ h

5, _. ~,-.

FM 4

=- m-N narr n -- m.- .~ i., 2.'-i, I\\ r w-n sr-__ , s.. 8 * * **

  • b r!

a 1 E.'. *4a 'y'.r

4..:~

c .i 1.*. t :*.*n." l iai-

2. - 1 sa,.+a 1

131 l ~ l 1 l I a% us l ~ I x [ -ee 1 e7 i, o 1,3..d c. l( ,h G l I tu I y. I e e E P 7 S 9 10 11 2^ 5-k .3 _-. ~ 3_..... ..i

cISE Q.e.. ';

l. )- T 0CAOON: Ad= itis:-stic: 3:11:'.1:~. 1-- \\ C0fCll:: C-0.4 'j c .,;.-y .%+.%s. ;* 5 som..,. ;:., .s, n S ver, -4a... h*[=h., v?.* % a p.. v. J03:.7220-001 i. rG G ,% m. o.. 4 s. I.. -a w.w.r.cegm ,r... .u., -t p k. 90517283 _y e l w. ~.u b

+ I I g i

  • '** a e

.M ll\\ 2 .d.11'; b y -..t.t.,:a

n...a...x.r.
l. :..?f..

,._. C-?2:5--- ~~ 5.. t , 3, ,t I ...... 1 .... s. t .r. *:: c.my 1 I 130 t i 2 1

  1. ~

{ i E. n3 1 w l. m t (7.3) des l { g us i c. t i = i s e t. l ~ i 1 t 1 I i 1 l t I .s g .. a 1, 12 s 9 m ~.2... .i g_s 2Z w u*

  • t l

gc;,- ::n: !O.TE *~~U L s. ~ CllC.::::::: - E-0. l+ i

.. )lge.

P==- a ~ ' j s . h..eE[.'8* -{ $A2!PLE. U -300 gi'36.. .1 ).i Jog: n2r)-001 h .4. 4.t;W L." A' es < :s = 'lP;.I.M.~ i 8#4'p* 3 "j s.ws W vm . v. L k l c / .t 4 l D, 90517286 k e m m y

E#' ggg; o7 3 DINT-- y ,,,M uw -~ Jan re f, i.~ .,:5.:.,.*. g i.. '_ ....r.. .. M:,$., b..;. 2-i- t~=E C.,.. r. 7"~ 1 .. d.- '). : .+... ~,... e, ;.. ).M,., ..:.r. a:.-

,,6,.me r+.<"

\\ y, 4 N .g, 4 k Q, c s u. '~,9 ~ g / \\ N. 4 s e \\ N s% $. I ..T 3 .c 1 1 o u 3 A I F s I +._VD 1 'c f' p .u en.. e \\ .e .o* i = V s. 3 s#z p,,. ,...._......4 a 5 f s @e'8 f t ns E:D r. n .v. ".m n Ar* - C.

g%'.

1 5::=E.. 3 ca.s. 7.N.O. '?. } \\ ty4?? ~j ig Hacer Con ~*St ~ .L ' ~;

1. cad :C

~ .f t'xd== o.. ,e-4..-.e n- .g e 4-g m cens. ' an ~ t'a-e C:":S"

e ".-

12t. 5(7:5) 9t. 5 (7si) 1 f;.;- : .7 (%) 57.2 (psi) ('e, c

  • A

,s=J' n7.0(Pcf) 'n 14.0(%) f;;'. y 3 u:.:(n ) 965'iP/287 y s

u. c:3 n

,, 4 _}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20106F653&oldid=4300702"