|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24029A2902024-01-29029 January 2024 Comment (3) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1542024-01-25025 January 2024 Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1402024-01-24024 January 2024 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML22228A1642022-08-15015 August 2022 Comment (5) of Cindy Marie Absey, Neil Havlik & Kim Murry on Behalf of League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activ ML22203A0462022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (3) of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc., on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22203A0452022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (2) of Jane Swanson on Behalf of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22202A4242022-07-19019 July 2022 Comment (1) of Anonymous on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML15275A2152015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (40) of Bruce Campbell on Helium Finding Adds New Wrinkle to Newport-Inglewood Fault ML15275A2132015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (38) of Mary Ivora on Environmental Benefits of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2292015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (31) Regarding Civilian Nuclear Power ML15275A2282015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (30) of Unknown Individual Opposing Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 ML15275A2302015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (32) of Joe Ivora Supporting the Relicensing of Diablo Canyon ML15275A2342015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (36) of Elizabeth Brousse on Behalf of Mothers for Peace on the License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2312015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (33) of Debby Nicklas, on Behalf of French Hospital Medical Center, Supporting the License Renewal and Ongoing Operations of PG&E ML15282A3002015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (45) of Allen Myers Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15289A3742015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (84) of Gene Nelson of Californians for Green Nuclear Power Supporting Renewal of the License Application for Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15292A5462015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (103) of Becky Ota and Craig Shuman, on Behalf of California Department of Fish and Wildlife, on Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant License Renewal ML15287A4362015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (71) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact ML15282A2982015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (43) of Minea Herwitz Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15258A3472015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (29) of Craig Shuman on Behalf of the State of CA - Natural Resources Agency, Regarding Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML15282A3042015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (49) of David Traub Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15282A3032015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (48) of Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15292A5452015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (102) of Bruce Campbell on Deis in Regards to Diablo Canyon Facility License Extension ML15292A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (92) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2352015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (91) of Alexander Cannara on Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2372015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (93) of Bob Greene on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2382015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (88) of Meagan Wilson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (89) of Mike Kirkwood on Behalf of Economic Alliance of Northern Santa Barbara County on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (90) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A3392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (94) of Sarah Risley, Heather Tarango, Shilo Terek, Megan Wilson, and Kristin Zaitz Supporting Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (95) of Madeline Cimone on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3412015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (96) of Daryl Gale Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3892015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (97) of Anthony Allen Bisset Opposing on the Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3902015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (98) of Joseph Ivora on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15258A3452015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (28) of Ann Mcpherson, on Behalf of Us EPA, on Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Operating License Renewal for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, California ML15292A3912015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (99) of Nina Beety, on Behalf of Smart Meter Harm, Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3922015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (100) of Margaret Smith on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A5442015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (101) of Antoinette Stein on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A4052015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (82) of Anthony Armini on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4032015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (81) of William P Gloege on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3132015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (83) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3142015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (85) of Lmh Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3152015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (86) from Anonymous Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3162015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (87) of Steve Mcgrath Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3982015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (76) William P. Gloege of Supporting Re-Licensing of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15289A4022015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (80) of Jerry Brown on Behalf of World Business Academy on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4012015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (79) of Kirk Gothier on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4002015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (78) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3992015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (77) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal ML15289A3972015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (75) of Jane Swanson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal 2024-01-29
[Table view] |
Text
DiabloCanyonCEm Resource From: M.L Boysen [mlboysen2000@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:08 PM To: fmeacham@co.slo.ca.us; bgibson@co.slo.ca.us; ahill@co.slo.ca.us; kachadjian@co.slo.ca.us; jpatterson@co.slo.ca.us Cc: janeslo@me.com; janeslo@kcbx.net; dianedolden@gmail.com; Stuyvenberg, Andrew; dcsafety@dcisc.org; rochelle@a4nr.org; info@wdc.greenpeace.org; info@icanw.org
Subject:
What We Know....
To: The San Luis Obispo Board of Surpervisors and Other Interested Parties
Subject:
What Do We Know about Nuclear Power Date: Tuesday, March 9th, 2010
Dear Sirs,
Thank you for appearing at today's meeting on our behalf. May I please add a comment or two.... trying to be brief ! --
first, some or all of the older nuclear plants on the East coast are apparently now leaking tritium into the aquifers there.
This is serious. After fifty or more years, we still know very little of Nuclear technology. We can't control it well nor neutralize it or its' waste. We don't know how. What little we know comes from the first plants built on our Eastern coast and the alarming results of waste dumped in the ocean, yet we didn't hear about these deadly leaks at today's meeting. It occurs to us that this plant near us may well want relicensing before it begins to leak --when, hopefully, it would be shut down as the Vermont plant is being shut down-- incidentally, by the state government, not the NRC. But PG&E has the money, OUR money, and the power to intimidate with their soothing "everything is fine, no worries" well paid professionals who seem so sincerely to believe in proliferating this Never Ending Deadly Waste problem.... for jobs? the money it will bring shareholders? a laissez-faire attitude towards the future of our children, wildlife and planet?
It seems clear the NRC is cosier with PG&E than with safe and sane technology asked for by "We the people".
The state of Nevada which is nearly 85% federally owned has nuclear "forever" waste leaking into it's ground water too and that poison is now heading West.... we don't have the technology to stop it. To comfort us they tell us it is moving "slow". This is not comforting. Yucca Valley is a "dead issue" per the NRC, so there is NO federal depository in our future and WE will be stuck with this deadly forever waste there at the plant, at the seaside, the doorstep of Mother Nature, the Terror of the Pacific Rim. The cost of moving the waste is prohibitive even IF there were a place that would accept it--
even South Dakota turned it down despite the promised jobs it would bring.
At one point in time it was suggested that the U.S. accept nuclear waste from other countries. Is this in our future?
Second, we would hope the seismic and other "studies" could be done by an INDEPENDENT group, not a PG&E in-house study. We heard NRC's young Berkeley PhD seismologist speak and were not impressed with the "nonspeak" language she used as she assured us -- all is well, no worries, our plant can withstand a 7.5 quake. As we know, Mother Nature certainly does not listen to such assurances nor is she bound by such questionable numeric quantifications.
1
One also wonders why the shareholders' money is not involved but only the rateholders, OUR money?.... we are apparently asked to provide the eighty-five million dollars (today, March 9th they thought about fourteen million dollars.
Last week they admitted to having spent nineteen million thus far) they will spend trying to convince us we should be saddled with countless more tons of "forever" waste waiting for a quake, tsunami, terrorist or just a sleepy employee to touch off the agonizing deaths of countless thousands of us and the ruination of our farm lands for tens of thousands of years. (Perhaps we are no longer a rich agricultural state and that no longer matters?)
In short, this is a technology that the world's "Best" and "Brightest" have not been able to control or neutralize.
Too much deadly waste has already been dumped into our oceans, including near the Farallon Islands off the coast of San Francisco (47,500 barrels, 14,500 Ci). And witness the hundreds of thousands of tons of chemical waste - that we know of--- dumped into the beautiful Baltic Sea. This can't be an Answer. Those in charge are now in the dark as to what to do.... they fear removing these various wastes-- to put, where?-- would be worse than leaving them there. The Farralon dumping for over twenty-four years was the brainchild of the Atomic Energy Commission....now the NRC... a result of not knowing or understanding the technology we are playing with. We are playing Russian Roulette with Murphy's Law and we are playing Russian Roulette with Mother Nature's laws and it is a too dangerous game. We want out NOW, with our lives and lands intact-- not thirty-five years from now-- or sooner via some catastrophic disaster, depending on the unknown but Certain movements of the earth.
Please stay with those of us who live here on the Central Coast and who share in a concern for the future of the planet.
Why can we not talk about the very little we know about nuclear power-- the thirty-eight year old plants in the East? Let's first know how to control it before we proliferate such a deadly product.
Thank you for your courageous vote today. It takes a lot of courage to oppose powerful people who insist nuclear is clean, safe and cheap. We KNOW it certainly is NOT clean, it is NOT safe, and-- ask us, it is NOT cheap. How can we re-license for another thirty-five years, a plant that could not be licensed TODAY? Let's shut it down. No more well meaning assurances that all is well, no worries, --based on money and jobs.
Thank you, MLBoysen/773-3920 (My apologies if this is a duplicate. I was unsure if the Website email acutally was sent) 2
Federal Register Notice: 75FR4427 Comment Number: 6 Mail Envelope Properties (950008.17179.qm)
Subject:
What We Know....
Sent Date: 3/9/2010 6:07:34 PM Received Date: 3/9/2010 6:07:36 PM From: M.L Boysen Created By: mlboysen2000@yahoo.com Recipients:
"janeslo@me.com" <janeslo@me.com>
Tracking Status: None "janeslo@kcbx.net" <janeslo@kcbx.net>
Tracking Status: None "dianedolden@gmail.com" <dianedolden@gmail.com>
Tracking Status: None "Stuyvenberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "dcsafety@dcisc.org" <dcsafety@dcisc.org>
Tracking Status: None "rochelle@a4nr.org" <rochelle@a4nr.org>
Tracking Status: None "info@wdc.greenpeace.org" <info@wdc.greenpeace.org>
Tracking Status: None "info@icanw.org" <info@icanw.org>
Tracking Status: None "fmeacham@co.slo.ca.us" <fmeacham@co.slo.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None "bgibson@co.slo.ca.us" <bgibson@co.slo.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None "ahill@co.slo.ca.us" <ahill@co.slo.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None "kachadjian@co.slo.ca.us" <kachadjian@co.slo.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None "jpatterson@co.slo.ca.us" <jpatterson@co.slo.ca.us>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: web32404.mail.mud.yahoo.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5495 3/9/2010 6:07:36 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: