|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML16081A4652016-03-21021 March 2016 Comment (072) of Beatrice Blake on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16085A3132016-03-18018 March 2016 Comment (154) of Sandra and Charles Kosterman on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML16053A5152016-02-17017 February 2016 Comment (037) of Emma Stamas on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML12200A2592012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (180) of Peter Samal on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone NRC-2012-0046, Comment (285) of Aliston Macmartin, Et Al on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone2012-07-12012 July 2012 Comment (285) of Aliston Macmartin, Et Al on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12181A3082012-05-31031 May 2012 Comment (158) of Barbara Tiner on Behalf of the Selectboard of the Town of Leverett, Ma on PRM-50-104, Regarding Emergency Planning Zone NRC-2009-0554, Comment (9) of Mark Leyse on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of a LOCA2011-07-30030 July 2011 Comment (9) of Mark Leyse on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of a LOCA ML1033402512010-11-24024 November 2010 2010/11/24-Comment (4) of John C. Butler, NEI, on New England Coalition PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Even ML0929309822009-10-19019 October 2009 2009/10/19-Comment (26) of Mary Lampert, Et. Al., on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch on Rules PR-50 and 50, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations. ML0909005812009-03-26026 March 2009 Comment (1) of George J. Silvestri, Jr. on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors ML0904802662009-02-0505 February 2009 Comment (141) of Elizabeth Adams on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904800492009-02-0303 February 2009 Comment (122) of Randy Kehler Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904402452009-01-29029 January 2009 Comment (44) of Scott Ainslie on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904403152009-01-28028 January 2009 Comment (37) of Sally Newton on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0707906372007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (50) Submitted by Sally Shaw on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906462007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (52) Submitted by Joseph A. Parzych on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51- Spent Fuel ML0707906552007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (54) Submitted by Scott Ainslie on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906712007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (58) Submitted by William C Pearson on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707906742007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (59) Submitted by Eleanor I. Gavin on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0708103842007-03-19019 March 2007 Comment (64) Submitted by Paul A. Gaukler on Behalf of Entergy Corp. on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel ML0707301562007-03-0707 March 2007 Comment (15) of Sunny Miller on Behalf of Traprock Peace Center on War with Iran and Hazards at the Vermont Yankee Reactor ML0703703822007-02-0505 February 2007 Comment (57) Submitted by Maure Briggs-Carrington on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0703703772007-02-0505 February 2007 Comment (55) Submitted by Margaret Gundersen on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0703700752007-02-0303 February 2007 Comment (43) Submitted by Louanne Wilson on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0703006382007-01-28028 January 2007 Comment (31) Submitted by Judy Davidson on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0702603832007-01-24024 January 2007 Comment (26) Submitted by Hattie Nestel on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0701805132007-01-13013 January 2007 Comment (5) Submitted by Art Hanson on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0701805182007-01-13013 January 2007 Comment (9) Submitted by Sidney Goodman on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Aacdemy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation ML0700804062007-01-0505 January 2007 Comment (9) Submitted by Nina Keller on Massachusetts Attorney General'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-51-10 to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0700804092007-01-0505 January 2007 Comment (10) Submitted by Lea Wood on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM 51-10, Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0636300322006-12-24024 December 2006 Comment (5) Submitted by Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, Rochelle Becker on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0636300292006-12-22022 December 2006 Comment (3) Submitted by Claire Chang on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 ML0626502212006-08-30030 August 2006 Comment from David R. Lewis of Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw and Pittman on Massachusetts Attorney General'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-51-10 to Amend 10 CFR Part 51 (August 25, 2006) ML0523604462005-08-23023 August 2005 Comment (5) Submitted by James Marc Leas Supporting Andrew Spano'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-54-02 Re Amendment to 10 CFR Part 54, Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants ML0523604372005-08-23023 August 2005 Comment (4) Submitted by Ed Anthes, Nuclear Free Vermont by 2012, Supporting Andrew Spano'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-54-02, Amendment to 10 CFR Part 54, Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants ML0327514662003-09-22022 September 2003 Comment (3) of Michael J. Colomb Re Proposed Generic Communication; Method for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Radiation Sources Using Two Dosimeters ML0323904982003-08-19019 August 2003 Comment (12) Submitted by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Michael R. Kansler on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors ML0312800402003-05-0505 May 2003 Comment (16) Submitted by Energy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, James M. Devincentis, Supporting and Endorsing Comments Submitted by NEI Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003 JPN-03-001, Comment (36) Submitted by Entergy Nuclear Inc., J. Knubel, Re Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-79, Protection for Day Care Centers and Nursery Schools in Radiological Emergency2003-01-15015 January 2003 Comment (36) Submitted by Entergy Nuclear Inc., J. Knubel, Re Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-79, Protection for Day Care Centers and Nursery Schools in Radiological Emergency 2016-03-21
[Table view] |
Text
PRM-51-11 DOCKETED (71 FR67072) M q u.,er_,*, USNRC Faire~wi( s Associate, I no February 5, 2007 (4:45pm) 3 76 Apptetrepe Po&t Road,, B bU*ti%-om, VT 05408 OFFICE OF SECRETARY Phone 802 -865 -9955 & Faxc802-304-1051 RULEMAKINGS AND fairewinds(dmac.com ADJUDICATIONS STAFF February 5, 2007 US NRC SECY(anrc.mov 301-415-1966 RE: Docket NO. PRM-51-11 Comments In Support Of PRM-51 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-5 1-11 requests that the NRC prepare a rulemaking that will require that the NRC reconcile its generic environmental impact statement (GEIS) for nuclear power plant operating license renewal applications with the National Academy of Sciences Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII) Phase 2 Report.
It is time for the NRC to do a complete review of the radiation exposure issues. My work as a paralegal in the nuclear safety arena has shown me again and again that the standards currently used are wholly inadequate.
I have read numerous MD expert witness reports and epidemiological studies from all over the world, and the data clearly shows that the health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation is not being calculated in a meaningful manner that protects the health and safety of the citizens of this country. Clearly, the NRC is doing an incredible disservice to any families living within at least 50 miles of any nuclear facility by applying a model that is outdated and no longer has any scientific validity.
In addition to working as a paralegal on several federal nuclear cases, I have also served as a paralegal in nuclear safety hearings before the Vermont Public Service Board. In n 0.1e.= ~ '-
listening to the testimony and writing deposition questions for the cross examination of witnesses, it was patently clear that Entergy's Vermont Yankee repeatedly massages and recalculates the radiation release data in an effort to meet or beat the fence line boundary radiation prohibitions. My research has shown that a similar shell game is conducted by utilities throughout the country under the supposedly health protection oversight of the NRC.
I have worked with families whose children have died and other families who have children dealing with years of chemotherapy becausethe NRC did not do its job of protecting the public from ionizing radiation releases from nuclear power plants. Do your job now and revise the ionizing radiation models to levels that protect the health of the general public. Our children's lives are at stake.
Please contact me if you wish any further information or testimony.
Sincerely, Margaret Gundersen, Certified Paralegal Cc: Sally Shaw Senator Bernie Sanders Senator Patrick Leahy Congressman Peter Welch Vermont Senator President Pro Tempore Peter Shumlin Vermont Speaker of the House Gaye Symington Page 2 of 2
Page 1 1,,SECY - Nt-iL l-~uIemaKIng NRC Shaw beIr Rulemaking ~snaw VII LI~
Be.irVI1 EIS P~age71 i From: Margaret Gundersen <fairewinds @mac.com>
To: <SECY@nrc.gov>
Date: Mon, Feb 5, 2007 4:23 PM
Subject:
NRC Rulemaking Shaw Beir VII EIS OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Please note my support for PRM-51 -11 Petition for Rulemaking Sincerely, Margaret Gundersen
/-
/Margaret Gundersen Certified Paralegal Fairewinds Associates, Inc 802-865-9955 - office 802-304-1051 - fax 802-238-5053 - cell fairewinds @mac.com <mailto:fairewinds @mac.com> /
H///
CC: Sally Shaw <acer8sac@comcast.net>
r5-Page 1I 111
\e mp..........MP.Pag Mail Envelope Properties (45C7A052.550: 20: 34128)
Subject:
NRC Rulemaking Shaw Beir VII EIS Creation Date Mon, Feb 5, 2007 4:22 PM From: Margaret Gundersen <fairewInds@mac.com>
Created By: fairewinds @mac.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDOO1 SECY (SECY) comcast.net acer8sac CC (Sally Shaw)
Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov comcast.net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 342 Monday, February 5, 2007 4:22 PM TEXT.htm 783 NRC Rulemaking Shaw Beir VII EIS.pdf 82614 Mime.822 117000 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message 4is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled
Irctem\GWOOO1 TMP Page 2-11 Block List is not enabled