|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2015-0070, Comment (044) from Mary Lampert of Pilgrim Watch on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning2022-08-22022 August 2022
Comment (044) from Mary Lampert of Pilgrim Watch on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning
ML22138A4242022-05-0606 May 2022
Comment (011) from Andrea Altieri on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning
ML18157A3062018-06-0202 June 2018
Comment (036) from Betsy Smith on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3072018-06-0101 June 2018
Comment (035) of Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18150A6382018-05-29029 May 2018
Comment (024) from Janet Azarovitz on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML17165A1972017-06-13013 June 2017
Comment (11) from Pilgrim Watch Regarding Regulatory Improvements for Power Reactors Transitioning to Decommissioning
ML16081A4652016-03-21021 March 2016
Comment (072) of Beatrice Blake on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16084B0142016-03-18018 March 2016
Comment (142) of Susan Carpenter on Behalf of Cape Downwinders on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16085A3132016-03-18018 March 2016
Comment (154) of Sandra and Charles Kosterman on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16084A9962016-03-17017 March 2016
Comment (127) of Susan Carpenter on Behalf of Cape Downwinders on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16081A4682016-03-15015 March 2016
Comment (075) of Rosanne Shapiro on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16053A5152016-02-17017 February 2016
Comment (037) of Emma Stamas on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML15349A8602015-12-11011 December 2015
Comment (007) of Rosemary and Cal Wilvert on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML15342A0552015-11-21021 November 2015
Comment (003) of Janet Azarovitz on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML13345A2672013-12-0505 December 2013
Comment (00351) of Brian O'Malley on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13339A2982013-12-0404 December 2013
Comment (00330) of Lee Roscoe on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML12201A0292012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (262) of Robert Holt on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12200A2592012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (180) of Peter Samal on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
NRC-2012-0046, Comment (285) of Aliston Macmartin, Et Al on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone2012-07-12012 July 2012
Comment (285) of Aliston Macmartin, Et Al on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12181A3082012-05-31031 May 2012
Comment (158) of Barbara Tiner on Behalf of the Selectboard of the Town of Leverett, Ma on PRM-50-104, Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12146A1862012-05-19019 May 2012
Comment (130) of Brooke Schoepf on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment
ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
NRC-2009-0554, Comment (9) of Mark Leyse on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of a LOCA2011-07-30030 July 2011
Comment (9) of Mark Leyse on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of a LOCA
ML1033402512010-11-24024 November 2010
2010/11/24-Comment (4) of John C. Butler, NEI, on New England Coalition PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Even
ML0929309822009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (26) of Mary Lampert, Et. Al., on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch on Rules PR-50 and 50, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations.
ML0909005812009-03-26026 March 2009
Comment (1) of George J. Silvestri, Jr. on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors
ML0904802662009-02-0505 February 2009
Comment (141) of Elizabeth Adams on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update
ML0904800492009-02-0303 February 2009
Comment (122) of Randy Kehler Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update
ML0904402452009-01-29029 January 2009
Comment (44) of Scott Ainslie on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update
ML0904403152009-01-28028 January 2009
Comment (37) of Sally Newton on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update
ML0813507272008-05-12012 May 2008
Comment (2) of Rochelle Becker, Glenn Carroll, & Mary Lampert on Behalf of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, Nuclear Waste South and Pilgrim Watch Regarding Pr 50, Power Reactor Security Requirements; Supplemental Proposed Rule
ML0726705742007-09-24024 September 2007
Comment (13) of Lisa Rainwater on Behalf of Riverkeeper on Epstein'S PRM-50-85 Re to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line
ML0726702452007-09-23023 September 2007
Comment (12) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch, Et. Al. on Epstein PRM-50-85 Re to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line
ML0725405732007-09-10010 September 2007
Comment (9) of Mary Lampet on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch, Et. Al. Supporting Epstein'S PRM-50-85 to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line
ML0708001252007-03-20020 March 2007
Comment (61) Submitted by Wedge Bramhall on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0708103842007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (64) Submitted by Paul A. Gaukler on Behalf of Entergy Corp. on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0707906462007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (52) Submitted by Joseph A. Parzych on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51- Spent Fuel
ML0707906682007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (57) Submitted by Judy and Howard Hall on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0707906552007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (54) Submitted by Scott Ainslie on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0707906712007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (58) Submitted by William C Pearson on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0707906372007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (50) Submitted by Sally Shaw on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0707906742007-03-19019 March 2007
Comment (59) Submitted by Eleanor I. Gavin on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Amend of 10 CFR Part 51 - Spent Fuel
ML0707303452007-03-13013 March 2007
Comment (35) Submitted by Edward and Charlotte Russell Supporting Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Spent Fuel at the Pilgrim
ML0707105622007-03-0909 March 2007
Comment (31) Submitted by Richard C. Diprima on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0707301562007-03-0707 March 2007
Comment (15) of Sunny Miller on Behalf of Traprock Peace Center on War with Iran and Hazards at the Vermont Yankee Reactor
ML0706606322007-03-0707 March 2007
Comment (30) Submitted by Marilyn Harquail on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM 51-10 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0706503682007-03-0404 March 2007
Comment (23) Submitted by Kevin W. Craig on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0706503632007-03-0202 March 2007
Comment (21) Submitted by Janice Nickerson on Massachusetts PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
2022-08-22
[Table view] |
Text
JýSECY -Docket No. PRM-51 -10 Page l PRM-51-10 71 FR64160 DOCKETED From: Claire Chang <clairech@crocker.com> USNRC To: <SECY@nrc.gov> December22, 2006 (2:18pm)
Date: Fri, Dec 22, 2006 2:18 PM
Subject:
Docket No. PRM-51 -10 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
Subject:
Comment regarding Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking to Amend 10 CFR Part Docket No. PRM-51 -10 FR Doc. E6-18363 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 7590-01-P Date: Dec 22, 2006 Citizens Awareness Network supports the Massachusetts Attorney General's petition for rulemaking to rescind the NRC's finding that environmental impacts of spent reactor fuel pool storage are insignificant. We agree with the petitioners request that the NRC Commission:
(a) consider new and significant information showing that NRC's characterization of the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage as insignificant in the 1996 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant Licenses is incorrect, (b) revoke regulations codifying the incorrect conclusion eliminating consideration of spent fuel storage impacts in NEPA decision-making documents, (c) issue a generic determination that the environmental impacts of high-density spent fuel pool storage are significant, and (d) order that any NRC licensing decision that approves high-density spent fuel pool storage at a nuclear power reactor or other facility must require the creation of an environmental impact statement ("EIS")
addressing (i) the environmental impacts of high density pool storage of spent fuel at that nuclear reactor and (ii) provide a reasonable array of alternatives for avoiding or mitigating those impacts.
Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition meets the standard for Rulemaking Petitions. NRC regulation 10 C.F.R. § 2.802(a) provides that
"[a]ny interested person may petition the Commission to issue, amend or rescind any regulation." The regulations require that the petitioner describes specific issues involved, views or arguments with respect to those issues, relevant technical, scientific or other data involved which is reasonably available to the petitioner, and other pertinent information that the petitioner deems necessary to support the action sought. 10 C.F.R. § 2.802(c)(3). The Massachusetts AG s meets this standard.
The rule also requires that the petitioner "should note any specific cases of which petitioner is aware where the current rule is unduly burdensome, deficient, or needs to be strengthened." The AG has met this requirement as well. The AG requests the revocation of 10 C.F.R. §§ Te ,,, p = 1 ;L sECi-o0
C-ocket No. PRM-51 -10 Pg 51.53(c)(2) and 51.95(c) and Table B-lof Appendix A to 10 C.F.R. Part 51 to ensure NEPA compliance in the Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee license renewal cases if the ASLB or the Commission interprets those regulations to bar the consideration of significant new information presented by the Attorney General's contentions regarding the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel. CAN supports this revocation.
Thank you very much for your consisderation,
c.:\temp\GW)0OOO1 .TMP PIaqe'-
Mail Envelope Properties (458C2F57.E16 : 15 : 15894)
Subject:
Docket No. PRM-51-10 Creation Date Fri, Dec 22, 2006 2:17 PM From: Claire Chang <clairech@crocker.com>
Created By: clairech @crocker.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY)
Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3030 Friday, December 22, 2006 2:17 PM Mime.822 4443 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled
