ML12243A438

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:11, 11 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

8/30/2012 Meeting - RR 48 UT Vs Rt Discussion
ML12243A438
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/2012
From: Timothy Lupold
Piping and NDE Branch
To:
Gibson L
References
Download: ML12243A438 (6)


Text

UT vs. RT Discussions Tim Lupold, Chief Piping & NDE Branch Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

ASME Code Cases

  • N N-659/Rev 659/Rev 1: Section III

- RG 1.193: Not approved for use

  • number of issues raised by NRC staff and the concerns expressed in the public comments

- Procedure/personnel demonstration qualification

- UT/RT effectiveness

ASME Code Cases

  • N N-713:

713: Section XI

- RG 1.193: Not approved for use

  • RT acceptance criterion vs UT acceptance criterion
  • Qualification/demonstration of ultrasonic methods
  • Interchangeabilit bet Interchangeability between een UT and RT

Arizona Public Service Company R li f R Relief Requestt 48

  • Proposes p Phased Array y Ultrasonic Examination Techniques (PAUT) q
  • Relief request approval pp by y February y 1,, 2013
  • Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) for Units 1, 2, and 3

US NRC Research Activities

  • NRR initiated a user need request (UNR) 2010-14

- Carol Nove will discuss the research

  • Scheduled S to complete in 2013

Summary y

  • Issues

- Precedent setting SE

  • Impact on New Reactors

- Timeline is short

  • Reviewer is heavily loaded

- Broad scope

  • Understanding

- Specific needs in 2013