ML13196A530

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:58, 4 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000498-13-005, 05000499-13-005 and Request for Information)
ML13196A530
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/2013
From: Vincent Gaddy
Operations Branch IV
To: Koehl D
South Texas
References
IR-13-005
Download: ML13196A530 (7)


See also: IR 05000498/2013005

Text

UNITE D S TATE S

NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON

R E G IO N I V

1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD

AR L I NGTON , TEXAS 7 601 1- 4511

July 15, 2013

Mr. Dennis L. Koehl

President & CEO/CNO

STP Nuclear Operating Company

P.O. Box 289

Wadsworth, TX 77483

SUBJECT: SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION -

NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000498,

05000499/2013005 AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION)

Dear Mr. Koehl:

From September 9 to September 13, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory

Commissions (NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification

inspection at South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2, using NRC

Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, Licensed Operator Requalification Program. Experience

has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors

and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a

productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection.

These documents have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A of the

enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the

inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies

the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of

this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are

usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these

documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional

documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Robyn Savage of your licensing

organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of

examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material

requested, please contact the lead inspector Ms. Theresa Buchanan (817) 200-1503

(Theresa.Buchanan@nrc.gov), Mr. Brian Larson at (817) 200-1172 (Brian.Larson@nrc.gov), or

Mr. Gabriel Apger (Gabriel.Apger@nrc.gov).

D. Koehl -2-

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control

number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control

number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document

system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Dockets: 50-498; 50-499

Licenses: NPF-76; NPF-80

Enclosure:

Biennial Requalification Document Request

cc w/enclosure:

Electronic Distribution for South Texas Project Electric Generating Station

ML13196A530

ADAMS: No Yes SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: TDB

Publicly Available Non-Sensitive

. Non-publicly Available Sensitive

OE: OB C: OB

TBuchanan VGaddy

/RA/ /RA/

7/15/2013 7/15/2013

BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

FROM: Theresa Buchanan

Operations Engineer, NRC RIV

817-200-1503

TO: Andrew Dunlap

Requalification Supervisor, South Texas Project Electric Generating Station

361-972-7224

SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT SEPTEMBER 9-13, 2013, LICENSED

OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)

A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation

activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module

(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc.). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or

hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than August 29, 2013.

  • Electronically: via e-mail, CD, or IMS Certrec and/or
  • Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV

1600 E. Lamar Blvd

Arlington, TX 76011

ATTN: Theresa Buchanan

General Requests:

  • List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
  • Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR

evaluators identified)

  • Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training

program up to date

  • List of outstanding LOR program changes
  • List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

  • Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator

requalification training program

  • Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes

02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality

  • The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
  • The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that

have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival

onsite.

-1- Enclosure

  • All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and

including the week before the inspection team is onsite. This will need to have

adequate password protection if emailed or double-envelope protection if mailed via

regular mail per NUREG-1021.

  • The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)

02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality

  • The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of

September 9, 2013 (week team is onsite)

  • The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately

via telephone at later date) to be given the week of September 9, 2013 (week team is

onsite)

  • Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week

prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.

  • All of the previous years NRC required annual operating tests.
  • Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
  • All portions of the UFSAR that identify operator response times for time critical

operator actions

02.05: Licensee Admin of Requalification Exams

  • All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
  • All procedures used to assess operator performance
  • All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
  • All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

02.06: Requalification Examination Security

  • Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on

the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a

periodic basis.

  • Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on

the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions

(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a

periodic basis.

  • All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to

develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current examination cycle tests and prior year examinations

  • List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to

examination security and overlap

02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program

  • List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requalification examinations

(includes training provided to operators to enable passing requalification

examinations and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses

observed during previous requalification examination cycle)

  • Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance

documentation)

-2- Enclosure

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,

tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators

  • All Procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any

SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be

electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test

procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient

test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert

review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.

o Transient test 3, Simultaneous closure of all Main Steam Isolation Valves

o Transient test 5, Trip of any single reactor coolant pump

o Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV

o Steady State tests for medium power test

  • All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for

Section 02.05 above.

  • Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,

summary list for those items closed between August 2011 through August 2013.

are included in an SBT package then the review of that package would be

acceptable.

  • Primary parameters tested in order to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC,

IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic

or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures

used and the acceptance criteria with results.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the

control room

  • Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues

B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection

activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on September 9, 2013.

02.02: Examination Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Examination and Op Test Quality

  • All Operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after

onsite week

  • All results up to the day the team leaves the site.

-3- Enclosure

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • Access to licensed operators records (operating and staff crews)
  • Access to licensed operators training attendance records
  • Access to licensed operators medical records

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • Simulator discrepancies (DRs) from August 2011 through August 2013. This should

include all open DRs and DRs that have been closed, including the

documentation/justification for closure.

  • Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at

the time of acceptance (as available).

  • Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and

neutronics models, to the actual plant.

  • All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs. Design differences in the simulator

(any documentation on this)

  • Summary list of modifications from August 2011 through August 2013.
  • Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due

date from August 2011 through August 2013.

  • Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to September 9, 2013).
  • The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a

single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all

transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include

the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each

transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter

expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond

the ANSI standard requirements.

  • All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The

applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other

means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and

the acceptance criteria with results.

  • All Simulator tests, configuration management, and related documents available in

the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,

simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.

  • Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room

C. South Texas Project Electric Generating Station is required to send the final results

summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed

to the regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and

comparison against the Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate

the exit results for the inspection.

-4- Enclosure