|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22112A0062022-04-20020 April 2022 (Public Version) Oconee SLRA - Final RCI 3.5.2.2.2.6-L ML21323A1152021-11-23023 November 2021 Subsequent License Renewal Environmental Review Requests for Additional and Subsequent Information - Enclosure ML18060A0282018-02-28028 February 2018 Noncurrence Process - Alternative to Codes and Standards ML16055A1882016-01-15015 January 2016 FOIA/PA-2016-0071 - Resp 3 - Interim, Continuing to Process Request. Part 2 of 2 ML16055A1872016-01-15015 January 2016 FOIA/PA-2016-0071 - Resp 3 - Interim, Continuing to Process Request. Part 1 of 2 ML15224A7792015-08-0707 August 2015 FOIA/PA-2015-0393 - Resp 2 - Final, Part 1 of 1 ML15162A0842015-06-11011 June 2015 GTCC Disposals at the Barnwell Low-Level Radioactive Waste Facility from 1998 to Present ML14135A4082014-05-0707 May 2014 FOIA/PA-2013-0213 - Resp 3 - Final, Group Letter D. Part 1 of 1 ML14058A0822014-02-0404 February 2014 Questions and Answers Related to the Oconee External Flooding Issue ML14058A0522014-02-0404 February 2014 Use of FERC Inundation Calculation Parameters ML14058A0502014-02-0404 February 2014 Questions and Answers Related to Oconee Flood Barrier ML14058A0492014-02-0404 February 2014 Site Adequate Protection Backfit Documented Evaluation ML14058A0212014-02-0404 February 2014 Request for Opinion on the Safe Shutdown Facility Added to the License Basis for the Oconee Units in an SER ML14058A0202014-02-0404 February 2014 Nancy Ssf Flooding URI Number 1 ML14058A0192014-02-0404 February 2014 TIA, Answers to Questions in Relation to Licensing Basis for Flooding for the Safe Shutdown Facility at Oconee Station ML14058A0152014-02-0404 February 2014 Site Adequate Protection Backfit Documented Evaluation ML14049A2872013-08-28028 August 2013 Meeting Feedback Form Meeting No. 20140354 ML16070A2882013-04-24024 April 2013 Jocassee and Keowee Dams, Breach Parameter Review, Dated April 24, 2013 (Redacted) ML13240A0162013-03-0606 March 2013 Report, Enclosure Oconee Nuclear Station Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report ML13052A7852013-02-26026 February 2013 Flood Licensing Basis Evaluation Open Items ML13056A1052013-02-0606 February 2013 Comparison of Approaches for Calculating a Jocassee Dam Failure Frequency ML13052A7802013-02-0606 February 2013 Options for Revising Oconee Flood CAL Due Dates ML13052A7812013-02-0606 February 2013 Timeline - Summary of Events ML13052A7832013-02-0606 February 2013 Draft NRC Information Notice on Dam Failure Frequency in Probabilistic Risk Assessments ML13052A7872013-02-0606 February 2013 Justification for Continued Operation of Oconee Nuclear Station ML13056A1002013-02-0606 February 2013 Resolution of Oconee Flooding Issue ML13052A7862013-02-0606 February 2013 Jocassee Dame Failure Frequency Components ML12121A6382012-04-30030 April 2012 Response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Steam Generator Questions for Oconee Unit 3 ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML12003A0632011-12-16016 December 2011 Tornado and High Energy Line Break (HELB) Mitigation License Amendment Requests (Lars) - Responses to Request for Additional Information, Part 2 of 6 ML12003A0672011-12-16016 December 2011 Tornado and High Energy Line Break (HELB) Mitigation License Amendment Requests (Lars) - Responses to Request for Additional Information, Part 4 of 6 ML12003A0682011-12-16016 December 2011 Tornado and High Energy Line Break (HELB) Mitigation License Amendment Requests (Lars) - Responses to Request for Additional Information, Part 5 of 6 ML12003A0692011-12-16016 December 2011 Tornado and High Energy Line Break (HELB) Mitigation License Amendment Requests (Lars) - Responses to Request for Additional Information, Part 6 of 6 ML1131406132011-11-0101 November 2011 Enclosure 3 - Regulatory Enforcement Conference - Resubmittal of Supplement ML11279A2532011-10-0606 October 2011 NRC Pre-submittal Meeting - Proposed Tornado Mitigation Flowchart Revision 6 Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 ML11279A2522011-10-0606 October 2011 NRC Pre-submittal Meeting- Proposed Turbine Building HELB Mitigation Flow Chart Revision 5 Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 ML1101907492011-01-18018 January 2011 Enclosure 3 - List of Attendees ML1035103792010-12-17017 December 2010 NFPA 805 Transition Pilot Plant FAQ 08-0054, Revision 1 ML1026404582010-09-13013 September 2010 Enclosure 2 - Redacted Version of Request for Additional Information Re the License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants (2001 Edition) ML1035100122010-08-19019 August 2010 NRC Staff Response to NFPA 805 Transition Pilot Plant FAQ 08-0054, Revision 0 (Updated) ML1023705812010-08-19019 August 2010 NFPA 805 Transition Pilot Plant FAQ 08-0054 ML1019301982010-06-0909 June 2010 Onsite Ground/Surface Water Monitoring Questionnaire for Oconee Nuclear Station ML14058A0612010-04-13013 April 2010 Draft Oconee Nuclear Site Adequate Protection Backfit Documented Evaluation ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML1019305442010-02-0808 February 2010 Ground Water Communication Supplemental Information Questions and Answers ML1100606662009-10-0909 October 2009 Photographs of Ssf Asw Leak and Piping Replacement Project Taken Between August 20, 2009 and October 9, 2009, by Oconee Resident Inspectors. Part 2 of 14 ML0927103442009-09-25025 September 2009 Site Visit Observation on 09/25/2009 by Joel Munday for Oconee ML1100404352009-09-15015 September 2009 Plant Issue Tracking Application; Plant Status Daily - Oconee Information for 09/15/2009 ML1100309332009-07-13013 July 2009 Congressional Staff Briefing: Monday July 13, 2009, 3:30 Pm, Room 2108 Rayburn Bldg; Topic: Follow-Up Questions Regarding Chairman'S June 17, 2009 Response Regarding a IP2 Buried Pipe Leak ML0909004332009-04-0606 April 2009 Enclosure 2 - Oconee Nuclear Station Regulatory Audit - Documents Reviewed 2022-04-20
[Table view] |
Text
Questions and Answers Related to Oconee Flood Barrier
- 1. How much confidence does NRR has about the fact the licensee's estimate of the Flood Freauency in its IPEEE is one order of lower based on operating experience?
We have very high confidence in our calculation. Attached is a spreadsheet comparing our experience data with the Oconee PRA and IPEEE calculations. Their error is the counting of only 2 failures of rockfill dams and then applying them to the population of both rockfill and earthen dams. During the same period (1940 to 2000) earthen dams had 32 failures. Had these 32 failures been properly included, the failure frequency would have been 2E-4 failure per dam year. If rockfill dams had been used alone, they would have gotten about the same result. There is no dam or mixture of dam populations that would get a result less than 1E-4 failure per dam year. Their result of 1.3E-5 is clearly in error.
References:
- Oconee IPEEE Rev 2 Section B.4.3, "Frequency of Dam failure"
- 2. Are there other IPEEEs which postulate external floods induced by dam failures? If there are, what are the frequencies, which those licensees used to assess risk?
NUREG-1742 identified only two IPEEEs that addressed dam failure floods quantitatively - Ft Calhoun and Diablo Canyon. Everyone else only addressed probable maximum precipitation and screened out dam failure as low probability. Unfortunately, there were few dam failure data sources around back then, so many plants used the estimate published in NUREG/CR-5042. The data source for the estimate in NUREG/CR-5042 was the Oconee PRA - NSAC/60. The calculation in NSAC/60 was done in error and it propagated throughout the industry.
References:
- NUREG/CR-5042, "Evaluation of External Hazards to Nuclear Power Plants in the United States.
- NUREG-1742, "Perspectives Gained From the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) Program
- 3. How much confidence do we have on licensee's Predicted flood height (1980s study) that estimate the flood height at 4.71'? level?
The licensee indicated that their calculations to support the 1983 study were not retrievable and personnel who performed the work wire not available. The staff has attempted to reconstruct what may be the logic for the original 4.71 foot flood level estimate as follows:
The benchmark nearest to the SSF shown on the Oconee site plan from the FSAR is at 796.63' elevation, Lake Keowee is maintained at 800' elevation. The difference is 3.37'. In the absence of any documented analysis, the basis for 4.71' is a mystery. Both the Oconee PRA and the IPEEE are silent on the 4.71' height and only mention the 5' height and even that is without explanation. However the plant does claim a probable maximum precipitation of 1.33' which when added to 3.37' would come out to 4.70' but that is speculation. Oconee never claimed it.
The plant is protected from lake Keovwee by a 20' or so dike that surrounds the intake area and a similar dike that forms an extension of the Keowee dam. The east side of the site slopes down into the river valley. If the waters of lake Keowee find a path into the west yard, the east side slope may not drain them away fast enough to maintain less than 5 feet of water in the west yard. If the Keowee dam faif, the..
valley to the east w guickl V =d oua*bWt 3.37 feet of water into the west yarox
- q vi-e 192 FERC rToob model of 4_-. assee dam failure put 12.5 to 16B -rfeel e*W o611owina failure of the Keowee
^,-site dam [-i now unavailable T"*Duke stuuy iidicaied the Keowee dam wvbuio survive-ana a o Tot "arrier in the yard was adequate. Duke has not presented the 1992 FERC flood model as a design basis.