ML13052A785

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Flood Licensing Basis Evaluation Open Items
ML13052A785
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/2013
From:
Office of Information Services
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2012-0325
Download: ML13052A785 (2)


Text

Oconee Flood Licensing Basis Evaluation Open Items

(~2 Item Questions to be further addressed Response Section 3.1 of Oconee's FSAR Does this mean that GDC are part of Revision (31 Dec 1999) states the licensing basis?

Conformance with 10CFR General Design Criteria FSAR Section 3.1.2 includes Is such a commitment part of the "flooding" in its list of natural licensing basis?

phenomena. This is only a "commitment" and not a GDC 2 regulatory requirement Following its1983 PRA study, Was this done to satisfy design and DPC built a 5-ft high wall to licensing bases?

protect the entrance doors to the SSF and referenced it in FSAR Section 9.6.3 In 1992, based on input from Does DE have a copy of FERC EAP FERC and in response to FERC's to reference the original reason for Emergency Action Plan (EAP), performing the study?

DPC performed a second flood analysis

Oconee Flood Licensing Basis Evaluation Open Items Based on its memo to file of What is the licensing basis-related December 1993, DPC decided to portion of their decision on not to not increase the height of the 5-ft increase wall height?

wall, citing its assessment of a low probability of dam failure [Note clear on what this question is getting at.]

In 1994 DPC performed a 50.59 What was the agency response or and deleted reference to the 5-ft review to this? Is the entire Nuclear high wall in subsequent FSAR Safety Evaluation the licensee revision prepared for the 50.59 available?

Do we believe the 50.59 conclusion is appropriate?

In 1995 DPC submitted its Note that IPEEE is not part of response to IPEEE (GL 88-20 licensing basis.

Supplement 4) showing a CDF of 7E-6 Recommendation to perform a What kind of backfit - compliance?

backfit utilizing DPC's second What is the basis for this flood analysis recommendation? (Note understanding answers to previous questions should inform this question.)