ML15118A540

Us Dept of Transportation, Maritime Administration (Marad) - Submittal of Decommissioning Funds Status Report for Cy 2014

ML15118A540
Person / Time
Site:	NS Savannah
Issue date:	04/23/2015
From:	Koehler E US Dept of Transportation, Maritime Admin
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
Download: ML15118A540 (16)

Text

0 U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE of Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Maritime Administration Ref: 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1); 50.82(a)(7) and 50.82(a)(8)(v)-(vii)

April 23, 2015 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Docket. No. 50-238; License No. NS-1; N.S. SAVANNAH Submittal of Decommissioning Funds Status Report for CY 2014 The Maritime Administration (MARAD) hereby submits Revision 0 of the CY 2014 Decommissioning Funds Status Report for the Nuclear Ship SAVANNAH (NSS) as Enclosure 1.

This letter contains no commitments.

If there are any questions or concems with any issue discussed in this report, please contact me at (202) 366-2631, and/or e-mail me at erhard.koehler@dot.gov.

I Erhard W. Koehler Senior Technical Advisor, N.S. SAV'ANNAH Office of Ship Disposal Enclosures HS'S ZAD

Docket No. 50-238; License NS-1; N.S. SAVANNAH Submittal of Decommissioning Funds Status Report for CY 2014, Revision 0 April 23, 2015 Enclosures

1. Decommissioning Funds Status Report for CY 2014, STS - 192 2

Docket No. 50-238; License NS-1; N.S. SAVANNAH Submittal of Decommissioning Funds Status Report for CY 2014, Revision 0 April 23, 2015 cc:

Electronic copy NSS ESC NSS SRC MAR 610, 612, 615 Hardcopy, cover letter only MAR-600, 640, 640.2 Hardcopy w/ all enclosures MAR-100, 640.2 (rf)

USNRC (Ted Smith, Mark C. Roberts)

USNRC Regional Administrator - NRC Region I MD Department of the Environment (Roland G. Fletcher; George S. Aburn, Jr.)

NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources (Beverly 0. Hall)

SC Department of Health & Environmental Control (Susan E. Jenkins; Aaron Gantt)

VA Department of Emergency Management (Michael M. Cline)

VA Department of Health (Leslie P. Foldesi)

EWK/jmo 3

0 U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 of Transportation Maritime Administration Docket No. 50-238; License No. NS-1; N.S. SAVANNAH to Submittal of Decommissioning Funds Status Report for CY 2014 DECOMMISSIONING FUNDS STATUS REPORT FOR CY 2014, STS - 192 4

U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration N.S. SAVANNAH DECOMMISSIONING FUNDS STATUS REPORT FOR CY 2014 STS - 192 Revision 0 Approved: Date:

Manager, N.S. SA VANNAH Programs Prepared by:

SA VANNAH Technical Staff

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 Record of Revisions Revision Summary of Revisions 0 The original version of the Decommissioning Funds Status Report for CY 2014 Revision 0 2

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 List of Effective Pages Page No. Rev. No. Page No. Rev. No. Page No. Rev. No.

1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 0 Revision 0 3

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

5 1.1 Decommissioning Status 5 1.2 Decommissioning Funding Sources 6 2.0 STATUS OF DECOMMISSIONING FUNDS ANNUAL REPORT 6 3.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE STATUS ANNUAL REPORT 7 3.1 Report required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) 7 3.2 Report required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vi) 8 3.3 Report required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii) 8 4.0 CY 2014 FUNDING 9 4.1 FY 2014 9 4.2 FY 2015 9 4.3 FY 2016 9 5.0 REGULATORY COMMITMENTS REGARDING DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING 10 5.1 Annual Request for Funds 10 5.1.1 FY 2015 10 5.1.2 FY2016 11 5.2 Annual Submittal of New Estimate 11 5.3 Revised Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE) 11 5.4 Content of MARAD Budget Requests 11 6.0 TIME REMAINING TO COMPLETE DECOMMISSIONING 11

7.0 REFERENCES

11 Revision 0 4

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Decommissioning Funds Status Report is submitted by the Maritime Administration (MARAD) as licensee for the Nuclear Ship SAVANNAH (NSS) and covers the CY 2014 reporting period. This report incorporates the guidance contained in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," Rev 1, Reference (a). The report is arranged in four sections following this introduction.

In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), each power reactor that has already closed is required to report annually the status of its decommissioning funds to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on a calendar year (CY) basis. Section 2.0 of this Decommissioning Funds Status Report includes the seven (7) reports required by 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1).

In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)-(vii), each power reactor that has already submitted its site-specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE) is required to provide a financial assurance status report annually to the NRC on a calendar year (CY) basis. MARAD submitted a summary of its DCE with its Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR), Rev 1, Reference (b). Section 3.0 of this Decommissioning Funds Status Report includes the reports required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)-(vii).

Section 4.0 of this report provides specific information regarding the funds made available to and expended by MARAD during the reporting period.

Finally, Section 5.0 of this report provides information on regulatory commitments made by MARAD that are germane to decommissioning funding.

Because the Federal fiscal year (FY) does not align with the CY, each annual decommissioning funds status report will include information from at least the two FYs that directly provide funds for expenditure during the reporting period. Prior to the submission of the report on (or about) March 31, the President will submit a budget request to the Congress for the upcoming FY. Because NSS activities are funded on an annual basis, the President's budget request is an early, although not definitive, indicator of future NSS decommissioning funding. Because that future funding can impact the decommissioning schedule described in the PSDAR, MARAD includes this public information for context, and in partial satisfaction of the 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7) requirement to notify the NRC of expected changes to content in the PSDAR.

1.1 Decommissioning Status The NSS is presently in protective storage. This phase of decommissioning activities is characterized by active surveillance, monitoring and maintenance of the nuclear facilities housed onboard the ship, and custody and maintenance of the ship as the primary physical boundary and protective barrier of the licensed site. Collectively, these are referred to as MARAD's licensed activities, and are reported annually to the NRC.

As described in the PSDAR, and elsewhere, the license termination deadline for the NSS is December 3, 2031.1 Final decommissioning of the NSS nuclear facilities will be performed by the DECON method.

In the interim, a project to bring the NSS into conformance with contemporary NRC SAFSTOR criteria (known as "SAFSTOR Preparations") has been described and committed to in the PSDAR.

This report addresses the funding status for all three of these decommissioning phases - licensed activities, SAFSTOR Preparations, and DECON.

December 3, 1971 is the de facto date of permanent cessation of operations. On that day, MARAD completed the reactor defueling by tensioning the reactor vessel head with six studs.

Revision 0 5

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 1.2 Decommissioning FundingSources MARAD is a modal agency of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT). It is a Federal licensee as defined by the NRC. As such, funds for decommissioning and termination of the NSS license will be provided by Federal appropriations. The budget process by which such appropriations are requested is deliberative and privileged, and is subject to Executive Branch priorities and direction.

Furthermore, the legislative review and authorization / appropriation actions taken on such requests are fully within the purview of the Congress. MARAD by itself cannot guarantee that decommissioning funds will be requested by the President or authorized and appropriated by the Congress in any given fiscal year.

2.0 STATUS OF DECOMMISSIONING FUNDS ANNUAL REPORT This section provides a discussion of the seven items required by 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), and incorporates the guidance contained in RG 1.159. The reporting requirements and corresponding MARAD information are provided below.

2.1 The amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required.

a) Current licensed activities require approximately $3. 00 million annually. MARAD plans to dry-dock the NSSfor regularmaintenance once during the protective storageperiod, in 2018, at an estimated cost of $6. 80 million.2 b) The December 2014 revised SAFSTOR project cost estimate is $11.7 million.

c) The December 2014 revised site-specific DECON-License Termination cost estimate is

$105. 00 million.

2.2 The amount accumulated to the end of the calendar year preceding the date of the report.

Accumulation offunds is not applicable to the NSS. As a Federallicensee, 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(iv) allows fundingfor decommissioning activities to be obtained by appropriationswhen necessary.

2.3 A schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected.

Annual collection offunds is not applicableto the NSS. As a Federallicensee, 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1)(iv) allowsfimdingfor decommissioning activities to be obtained by appropriationswhen necessary.

2.4 The assumptions used regarding rates of escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections.

The 2014 revised site-specific DECON-License Termination cost estimate used 5. 00% escalation for disposal of low level radioactivewaste (LLRW). Transportationcosts were escalatedat

0. 00%. Electric costs were escalatedat 7.02%. All other industrialtask costs were escalatedat 2.18%. Escalationfactors were determinedreferencingNUREG 1307, Revision 15 (Waste Disposalcosts) and by direct datafrom Bureau of Labor Statisticsfrom http://www. bis.gov/data/

Series ID for the latest 2014 values availableat the time of the calculation:

1. Wpu0543 (Industrialelectricpower)

2. Wpu0573 (Lightfuel oils)

3. CIU20100000002101(Total compensation,private industry, Northeastregion).

2 The drydocking cost estimate is escalated to a 2018 basis from the $4.1 million contract cost for drydocking the NSS in CY 2008.

Revision 0 6

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 Due to funding constraints in FY 2014, the NRC was unable to fund the Pacific Northwest NationalLaboratoriescontract and consequently there was no December 2014 revision to NUREG-1307. As noted in Reference (c), licensees may use LLRW burial charge datacontained in Revision 15 of NUREG-1307 when preparingthe CY 2014 decommissioningfunds status report. MARAD has disposalsites availableat substantially less cost than the Washington and South Carolinadisposal site costs in NUREG-1307. Therefore, MARAD has conservatively used 5% escalationfor LLRW disposalfor this report.

Transportationescalatedcosts for 2014 was a negative value. Due to the highly volatile nature of thisfactor, a conservative value of 0. 0% escalationwas usedfor Transportationcostfor 2014 estimatepurposes.

Based on the above factors, the simple escalation ratefrom 2013 to 2014 was 2.65%. The SAFSTOR project cost estimate was revised by escalatingthe 2013 estimate at 2.65%.

There are no rates of earnings on decommissioningfunds.

2.5 Any contracts upon which the licensee is relying pursuant to paragraph (e)(1)(v) of this section.

Not applicable because MARAD, as a Federallicensee, is fundedper the 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1)(iv) method.

2.6 Any modifications occurring to a licensee's current method of providing financial assurance since the last submitted report.

There have been no modifications to MAR4D 'sfinancialassurancemethodology, which is limited to the use of Federalappropriations.Please refer, however, to the response in Section 4.1 below for more information.

2.7 Any material changes to trust agreements.

Not applicable because MARAD, as a Federallicensee, is fundedper the 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1)(iv) method. Consequently, no trust agreements exist.

3.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE STATUS ANNUAL REPORT This section provides a discussion of the ten items required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)-(vii). Effective December 17, 2012, Section 50.82 imposed new reporting requirements on licensees who previously submitted to the NRC site-specific decommissioning cost estimate (DCE). The reporting requirements and corresponding MARAD information are provided below.

3.1 Report required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)

(A)

1. The amount spent on decommissioning, both cumulative and over the previous calendar year, Within the context ofprotective storage as a phase of decommissioning activities, all of the funds spent by MARAD in CY 2013 andprecedingyears (FY 2005 - present) have been spentfor decommissioningpurposes. As a practicalmatter, no funds have been spent on major actions described in either the SAFSTOR Implementation Planor the DECONCost Estimate. As describedin STS-191, the CY 2014 Annual Report (Reference d), MARAD plannedand completed minor environmentalremediation tasks within three radiologicallycontrolledareas during the reportingperiod. The budgetedcost for these activities was $65,000.

2. The remaining balance of any decommissioning funds, and Revision 0 7

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 Not applicablebecause MARAD, as a Federallicensee, is funded per the 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1)(iv) method. Although funds appropriatedto MARAD's Ship Disposalaccount are "availableuntil expended, "any year-to-year carryoveris applied to immediate requirements. No balance is maintained

3. The amount provided by other financial assurance methods being relied upon; None. M4RAD, as a Federallicensee, relies solely on the 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1)(iv) method.

(B) An estimate of the costs to complete decommissioning, reflecting any difference between actual and estimated costs for work performed during the year, and the decommissioning criteria upon which the estimate is based; MARAD's CY 2014 estimate to complete decommissioning is $105 million based on escalationfrom the 2013 estimate (see Section 2.4 above for the escalationbasis). This estimate is effective as of December 2014. This estimate does not credit any work performed duringthe reportingperiod.

(C) Any modifications occurring to a licensee's current method of providing financial assurance since the last submitted report; and There have been no modifications to MARAD 'sfinancial assurance methodology, which is limited to the use of Federalappropriations. Please refer, however, to the response in Section 4.1 below for more information.

(D) Any material changes to trust agreements or financial assurance contracts.

Not applicablebecause A1fRAD, as a Federallicensee, relies solely on the 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(iv) method.

3.2 Report requiredby 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vi)

If the sum of the balance of any remaining decommissioning funds, plus earnings on such funds calculated at not greater than a 2 percent real rate of return, together with the amount provided by other financial assurance methods being relied upon, does not cover the estimated cost to complete the decommissioning, the financial assurance status report must include additional financial assurance to cover the estimated cost of completion.

Not applicableto MARAD.

3.3 Report requiredby 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii)

After submitting its site-specific DCE required by paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section, the licensee must annually submit to the NRC, by March 31, a report on the status of its funding for managing irradiated fuel.

The final disposition and status of the Atomic Energy Commission's nuclearfuel utilized by the NSS is described in the September 21, 1973, OperationsReport and also in Section 1.3.1 of the FinalSafety Analysis Report asfollows:

Thirty six spentfuel elements (Core I and Ia) were shippedfrom Galveston, TX to the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) - Savannah River Plant,Aiken, SC in nine shipments from October 4 through December 21, 1972 via a lowboy trailerusing the Piqua/Elk River Shipping cask.

The 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii) report must include the following information, current through the end of the previous calendar year:

Revision 0 8

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 (A) The amount of funds accumulated to cover the cost of managing the irradiated fuel; AfRAD is storingno irradiatednuclearfuel and, therefore, has no accumulatedfunds to cover such costs.

(B) The projected cost of managing irradiated fuel until title to the fuel and possession of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy; and MARAD is storingno irradiatednuclearfuel and, therefore, has no need to project such costs.

(C) If the funds accumulated do not cover the projected cost, a plan to obtain additional funds to cover the cost.

MARAD is storingno irradiatednuclearfuel and, therefore, has ito need to obtain additional funds to cover such cost.

4.0 CY 2014 FUNDING The NSS was maintained in mothballed protective storage throughout CY 2014. Approximately $2.80 million in appropriated funds were available to MARAD to maintain the NSS during the period. Funds were sourced from within MARAD's Ship Disposal appropriations for FY 2014 (January 1 - September 30, 2014) and 2015 (October 1 - December 31, 2014).

4.1 FY2014 FY 2014 began on October 1, 2013 and ended on September 30, 2014. Funding for the 1Q of FY 2014 falls before the reporting period; however, the events of that quarter are important in context. In the absence of an approved budget and appropriations, a partial Government funding gap was imposed beginning on October 1, 2013. MARAD's Ship Disposal Program had sufficient carryover funds available to maintain staffing. Service contracts were funded in FY 2013 with performance periods through November 2013, and were similarly unaffected during the funding gap. During the Continuing Resolution (CR) that followed, funding was sufficient to maintain NSS operations without impact. After passage of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY 2014, provided funding for NSS activities at the original budget request level of $2.80 million.

Based on the revised decommissioning schedule submitted in Reference (e), the funding for FY 2014 did not result in a change to the content of the PSDAR, and consequently no 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7) notification was submitted.

4.2 FY2015 FY 2015 began on October 1, 2014 and will end on September 30, 2015. Funding for FY 2015 was initially provided by a Continuing Resolution (CR) that was effective to December 11, 2014. The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015 provided a lump sum of $4.00 million for activities funded by the Ship Disposal account. A nominal breakdown of the lump sum provides

$2.00 million for NSS operations, with the balance of program activities funded by prior year carryover.

Based on'the revised decommissioning schedule submitted in Reference (e), the projected funding for FY 2015 did not result in a change to the content of the PSDAR during the reporting period, and consequently no 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7) notification was required.

4.3 FY 2016 FY 2016 will begin on October 1, 2015 and will end on September 30, 2016. Although this falls outside the reporting period, MARAD includes this information for context. The President's FY 2016 Budget Request for the Maritime Administration was submitted to the Congress on February 2, 2015. The Revision 0 9

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 request for NSS activities is $3.00 million. No funds are requested for either SAFSTOR Preparations or DECON.

Based on the revised decommissioning schedule submitted in Reference (e), MARAD anticipates that the projected funding for FY 2016 will not result in a change to the content of the PSDAR, and consequently no 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7) notification is anticipated based on the FY 2016 budget request.

5.0 REGULATORY COMMITMENTS REGARDING DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING There are four (4) recurring commitments regarding decommissioning funding that are reported on in each annual Decommissioning Funds Status Report. The resolution of any one-time commitments will be described as required. The recurring commitments are described in the following sections.

5.1 Annual Request for Funds In Reference (f), MARAD made the following regulatory commitment:

Annually, MARAD will requestfunds specificallyfor decommissioning. The NRC will be informed of these decommissioningfunding requests annually by March 31. [Continuingaction]

Beginning in the PSDAR, and in periodic correspondence thereafter, MARAD has reiterated its understanding of its responsibility to request and obtain decommissioning funds in sufficient quantity and time to meet the NS-1 license termination deadline of December 3, 2031. Given the inherent nature of the budget process, MARAD defines its commitment to be satisfied annually when it makes a request for decommissioning funds to the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. MARAD has no independent authority to seek decommissioning funds if the request is not made part of the President's Budget Request for the Department of Transportation. Documentation regarding the annual request is maintained by the licensee, and is available for inspection.

Two budget requests are normally in process during any reporting period. The first is the President's Request that is submitted to the Congress during the first quarter of the CY for the FY beginning on October 1st of the reporting period. The second is the deliberative and privileged internal process that begins in April, continues throughout the reporting period, and culminates in the President's Request to Congress in the following year. Although the submission of the outyear (or second) budget request falls outside of the reporting period, it does normally occur prior to the reporting deadline of March 31. As noted in Section 1.0, this outyear request is a reasonable predictor of future decommissioning funding and activity, and publicly available information about the request is included in this report for context.

Each year in its Decommissioning Funds Status Report, MARAD includes a statement regarding the budget requests prepared during the reporting period.

5.1.1 FY 2015 The President's FY 2015 Budget Request for the Maritime Administration was submitted to the Congress on March 4, 2014. As with the FY 2014 request, no funds were requested for either SAFSTOR Preparations or DECON; however, the budget request narrative includes the following new language related to future decommissioning funding:

While funding at this level does not allow MARAD to begin (decommissioning), this resource-intensive requirement is a near-termconcern and the agency is developingformal decommissioning project execution plans and multi-year budget estimates.

For the NSS, there is no technical reason to continue to defer the multi-year decommissioningproject and seek license termination.

Revision 0 10

SA1,4NNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status'Report For CY 2014, Revision 0 From a total cost perspective, ... continued deferral of this project can on/v increase its total cost to the Government, with no correspondingbenefit.

5.1.2 FY 2016 The President's FY 2016 Budget Request for the Maritime Administration was submitted to the Congress on February 2, 2015. As with the FY 2015 request, no funds were requested for either SAFSTOR Preparations or DECON; however, the budget request narrative merely acknowledges the DECON requirement without the additional affirmative language found in the FY 2015 request (see above). This apparent reversion is the result of continuing discussion with responsible Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) budget officials, and the balancing of priorities for the FY 2016 budget cycle. Nevertheless, MARAD, OST and OMB are cognizant of the responsibilities and funding commitment requirements for DECON, and these obligations will continue to be examined and balanced during future annual budget development cycles.

5.2 Annual Submittal of New Estimate In Reference (e), MARAD made a regulatory commitment that was subsequently revised as follows:

Submit a new estimate annuall/ by either revising the site specific estimate based on circumstances that affect its underlying assumptions, or by using cost escalationfactors no smaller than those in the most recent revision to NUREG 1307.

The CY 2014 estimate is provided in Sections 2.1 and 2.4 of this report.

5.3 Revised Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE)

In Reference (e), MARAD made the following regulatory commitment:

The site specific DCE will be revised at least even-vfive (5) years.

The site specific DCE is scheduled for full revision in CY 2015.

5.4 Content of MARAD Budget Requests In Reference (g), MARAD made the following regulatory commitment:

Because the privity of the Federalbudgetingprocess precludespublic notifcation of the content of agency budget requestsprior to their submittal to the Congress, M4RAD has determined thatfiautre 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7) notifications will be submitted under a 10 CFR 2.390 request fbr withholding.

Based on the revised Decommissioning Activities Schedule submitted to the NRC in Reference (e),

MARAD determined that no 10 CFR 50.82(a)(7) notification (change to the content of the PSDAR, particularly the decolmnissioning schedule) was required during CY 2014.

6.0 TIME REMAINING TO COMPLETE DECOMMISSIONING As of December 3, 2014, 43 years of protective storage had elapsed; more than two-thirds of the allowed 60-year protective storage period.

7.0 REFERENCES

a. Regulatory Guide 1.159, Assuring the Availability of Fundsfor Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors, Revision 1, October 2003

b. Letter from Mr. Erhard W. Koehler (MARAD) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC),

dated December 11, 2008, Submittal of Post Shutdown DecommissioningActivities Report, Revision I Revision 0 I1I

SAVANNAH Technical Staff STS - 192, Decommissioning Funds Status Report For CY 2014, Revision 0

c. NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2014-12: DecommissioningFund Status Report Calculations-Update To Low-Level Waste Burial Charge Information, October 14, 2014

d. Letter from Mr. Erhard W. Koehler (MARAD) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated February 28, 2015, Annual Reportfor CY2014, Revision 0

e. Letter from Mr. Erhard W. Koehler (MARAD) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated March 31, 2011, Submittal of DecommissioningFunds Status Reportfor CY 2010 and updated Governmental Statement of Intent for DecommissioningFinancialAssurance

f. Letter from Mr. Erhard W. Koehler (MARAD) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated March 9, 2011, Response to Receipt of DecommissioningFunds Status Update (CY 2009) for N.S.

SA VANNAH

g. Letter from Mr. Erhard W. Koehler (MARAD) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated June 04, 2010, Submittal ofDecommissioningFunds Status Updatefor CY 2009 and Governmental Statement of Intent for DecommissioningFinancialAssurance Revision 0 12