ML17207A775

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:30, 30 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies of Error in Fl Power & Light Co 800116 Response to Motion Re Class 9 Accidents.Petition for Rehearing Was Denied by Court of Appeals on 790130.Order Encl
ML17207A775
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1980
From: Reis H
LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS, AXELRAD & TOLL
To: Mike Farrar, Johnson W, Salzman R
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
Shared Package
ML17207A776 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002010565
Download: ML17207A775 (2)


Text

LAW OFF ICCS LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS, AKELHJILD 8C TOLL l025 CONN FCTICUT AVCNUC> N. W ROSCRT LOWENSTCIN WASHINGTON> D. C. 20036 JACK R, HCWMAN HAROLD F. RCIS MAURICE AXCLRAO 202 '62- 8400 OAVIO R, TOLL K*THLCCN H SHCA J. A. BOVKHIGHT,JR. January 21, 1980 6 >~+

C.GREGORY GARNES MICHAEL A 8AVSER OCOORAH L, SERHSTCIN

  • LDCRT V, CARR, JR, ROSCRT H. CVLI>

I>EYER G. FLYNN WILLIAMJ, FRANKLIN I'RCOCRIC S. GRAY V CP OOVGLAS G. GRECH Michael C. Farrar, Esp. Dr. W. Reed Johnson Chairman, Atomic Safety and Atomic Safety and Licensing Licensing Appeal Board Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, DC -20555 Washington, DC 20555 Richard S. Salzman, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 In the Matter of FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 2)

Docket No. 50-389

Dear Members of the Board:

The purpose of this letter is to correct an error which appears in "FPL's Response to Motion Concerning Class 9 Accidents," dated January 16, 1980. On page 6 of the docu-ment the following statement, is made: "The Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing on January 15, 1979. 5/"

'Footnote 5 states that the order denying rehearing is reproduced in the Appendix to the Response.

In fact, the petition for rehearing was denied by the Court of Appeals on January 30, 1979, not on January 15,

~

Boo 30K ~6~

E

C LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS, A%1 D 8c TOLL Members of the Board January 21, 1980 Page Two 1979, and what is reproduced in the Appendix is an order granting an extension of time to file the petition. Enclosed is a copy of the Court of Appeals'rder denying the petition for rehearing and dated January 30, 1979.

. Respectfully Submitted, Harold F. Reis Counsel for Florida Power 6 Light Company Enclosure cc: See Attached Certificate of Service