|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML15138A1032015-04-29029 April 2015
Comment (1) of Christine Arnott Opposing Behalf of Delaware River Keeper on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML14356A1862014-12-16016 December 2014
Comment (26) of an Individual Opposing on Hope Creek and Salem Expanding Nuclear Power Facilities
ML13023A3842012-12-14014 December 2012
Comment (269) of Deborah W. Harris on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11266A1502011-09-21021 September 2011
Comment (6) of Christi Demark Opposed to the Proposal by PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Product Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek Generating Station
ML1100602872010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (5) of Grace Musumeci, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Draft Supplement 45 Regarding Hope Creek and Salem Units 1 & 2
ML1032300472010-11-0808 November 2010
Comment (1) of Stephen M. Sweeney on Behalf of New Jersey Senate, Supporting Pseg'S Application to Construct a New Nuclear Generating Facility in Salem County
ML1035104262010-11-0505 November 2010
Comment (1) of Marv Lewis on Proposal to Extend the Operating Life of Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plant Along with the Salem Units 1 & 2 by 20 Years Reeks with Betrayal of Responsibility to Protect the Public
ML1009500372010-04-0101 April 2010
Comment (5) of Leigh Davis, Dena Jaborska, Wenonah Hauter, Amy Goldsmith, Jeff Tittel, William Kibler, Jennifer Coffey & Norm Cohen on Behalf of Food & Water Watch Opposing Proposal of PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Produce Cobalt-60 at H
ML1009701262010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (3) of 243 Individuals Regarding Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order
ML1009205462010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Re-Licensing of Columbia Generating Station
ML1009205492010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (4) of David A. Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on the Proposal of PSEG to Load Cobalt-60 Producing Rods in Reactor Core at Hope Creek
ML1009205482010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (2) of William H. Day Supporting Proposal to Produce Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek
ML1009205472010-03-16016 March 2010
Comment (1) of William E. Morris on Pseg'S Plan to Produce Cobalt-60 Which Can Be Used to Promote and Maintain Human Health
ML1022805622009-11-30030 November 2009
Comment (8) of Norm Cohen, on Behalf of the Unplug Salem Campaign, on Environmental Review of the Relicensing of Hope Creek
ML1022805602009-11-0505 November 2009
Comment (6) of Fred Stine on Behalf of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network on PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem Generating Station
ML1022805552009-11-0404 November 2009
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Salem and Hope Nuclear Plants 20 Year License Extensions
ML1022805592009-11-0303 November 2009
Comment (5) of Ellen B. Pompper, on Behalf of Self, Supporting PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations
ML1022805572009-10-24024 October 2009
Comment (3) of David O. Rickards on Behalf of Instream Energy, LLC Re Hearing on Salem/Hope Creek Nuclear Plant
ML1022805582009-10-12012 October 2009
Comment (4) of Gina Carola on Behalf of Sierra Club, Resolution Passed by New Jersey Chapter of Sierra Requesting NRC & New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Require Pse&G to Erect Cooling Towers
ML1022805562009-09-0707 September 2009
Comment (2) of Sidney J. Goodman Opposing on License Renewal for the Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants
ML1022805612009-09-0303 September 2009
Comment (7) of William R. Dunn, Supporting Salem and Hope Creek License Renewal Applications
ML0719402422007-06-0101 June 2007
Comment (1) of Patrick Mulligan on Behalf of New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, Regarding Hope Creek License Change Request (LCR) H05-01 Extended Power Uprate
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0333808232003-11-30030 November 2003
Comment (4) of Norm Cohen Re 30 Day Comment Extension on Draft Criteria That Would Codify Currently non-compliant Actions and Forgive Long Standing and Widespread Fire Protection Violations at Nuclear Power Stations
2015-04-29
[Table view] |
Text
PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-0236 o PSEG Nuclear LLC DEC 1.2 2011 LR-N 11-0371 Ms. Cindy Bladey Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch Office of Administration, Mail Stop TWB-05-BOl M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
_ .3-I U, Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and 75',.-NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 Hope Creek Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50-354
Subject:
Comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, "Event Reporting Guidelines:
10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73." (Federal Register dated October 13, 2011, 76 FR 63565, Docket ID NRC-2011-0237).
Reference:
Letter from Chris Earls (NEI) to NRC: "NEI Comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, "Event Reporting Guidelines:
10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73." (Federal Register dated October 13, 2011, 76 FR 63565, Docket ID NRC-2011-0237), dated December 6, 2011.PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, "Event Reporting Guidelines:
10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73." PSEG has reviewed and fully supports the comments made by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in the referenced letter above including all attachments.
PSEG would like to expand on NEI's comments on Section 3.2.7 of NUREG-1022.
Incorporating the term of operability when the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v) and 50.73(a)(2)(v) are focused on the fulfillment of the safety function of the structures, systems or components would unnecessarily increase the event notifications and licensee event reports (LER). A component in a system may be declared inoperable due to failure to meet the surveillance requirement (SR)acceptance criteria; however, the SR acceptance criteria frequently has margin prior to/-A;,)-~ -r 2 ::- /ý. / e Rulemaking and Directives Branch DEC i 2 201l LR-Nl1-0371 Page 2 the values credited in the plant's safety analysis.
If the component is still capable of providing the function relied upon in the plant's safety analysis, even though the component was declared inoperable for failing to meet the SR acceptance criteria, the component is still capable of fulfilling its safety function and would not be reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v) and 50.73(a)(2)(v).
The proposed changes in Draft NUREG-1 022 Revision 3 could result in an operator distraction for events that are not risk-significant.
PSEG suggests that the NRC adopt the changes identified in Attachment 2 of the NEI comments.Although not specifically addressed in the NEI comment letter referenced above, the proposed changes to NUREG-1022 Section 2.8, Retraction or Cancellation of Event Reports, as described in the 'Discussion of Changes' document (Accession No.MLI 1068A030) are based on the proposed changes to section 3.2.7. Any changes to section 2.8 should be consistent with this resolution of the comments to section 3.2.7.There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Brian Thomas, Principal Licensing Engineer, at 856-339-2022.
Sincerely, Paul R. Duke, Jr.Manager -Licensing C NRC Document Control Desk Corporate Commitment Tracking Coordinator
