|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24212A1312024-07-29029 July 2024
Comment (71) of Mary Quinn on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, and Holtec Palisades, LLC; Palisades Nuclear Plant; Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare an Environmental Assessment
ML15138A1032015-04-29029 April 2015
Comment (1) of Christine Arnott Opposing Behalf of Delaware River Keeper on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML14356A1862014-12-16016 December 2014
Comment (26) of an Individual Opposing on Hope Creek and Salem Expanding Nuclear Power Facilities
ML14302A0762014-10-21021 October 2014
Comment (00002) of John Cannon Opposing on Environmental Impact Statement for an Early Site Permit at the PSEG Site
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11266A1502011-09-21021 September 2011
Comment (6) of Christi Demark Opposed to the Proposal by PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Product Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek Generating Station
ML1100602872010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (5) of Grace Musumeci, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Draft Supplement 45 Regarding Hope Creek and Salem Units 1 & 2
ML1035600192010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (3) of Robert K. Marshall, on Behalf of New Jersey Energy Coalition, on NRC Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal Regarding Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 & 2
ML1032300472010-11-0808 November 2010
Comment (1) of Stephen M. Sweeney on Behalf of New Jersey Senate, Supporting PSEGs Application to Construct a New Nuclear Generating Facility in Salem County
ML1035104262010-11-0505 November 2010
Comment (1) of Marv Lewis on Proposal to Extend the Operating Life of Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plant Along with the Salem Units 1 & 2 by 20 Years Reeks with Betrayal of Responsibility to Protect the Public
ML1009500372010-04-0101 April 2010
Comment (5) of Leigh Davis, Dena Jaborska, Wenonah Hauter, Amy Goldsmith, Jeff Tittel, William Kibler, Jennifer Coffey & Norm Cohen on Behalf of Food & Water Watch Opposing Proposal of PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Produce Cobalt-60 at H
ML1009205462010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Re-Licensing of Columbia Generating Station
ML1009701262010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (3) of 243 Individuals Regarding Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order
ML1009205492010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (4) of David A. Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on the Proposal of PSEG to Load Cobalt-60 Producing Rods in Reactor Core at Hope Creek
ML1009205482010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (2) of William H. Day Supporting Proposal to Produce Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek
ML1009205472010-03-16016 March 2010
Comment (1) of William E. Morris on PSEGs Plan to Produce Cobalt-60 Which Can Be Used to Promote and Maintain Human Health
ML1022805622009-11-30030 November 2009
Comment (8) of Norm Cohen, on Behalf of the Unplug Salem Campaign, on Environmental Review of the Relicensing of Hope Creek
ML1022805602009-11-0505 November 2009
Comment (6) of Fred Stine on Behalf of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network on PSEG Nuclears License Renewal for Salem Generating Station
ML1022805552009-11-0404 November 2009
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Salem and Hope Nuclear Plants 20 Year License Extensions
ML1022805592009-11-0303 November 2009
Comment (5) of Ellen B. Pompper, on Behalf of Self, Supporting PSEG Nuclears License Renewal for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations
ML1022805572009-10-24024 October 2009
Comment (3) of David O. Rickards on Behalf of Instream Energy, LLC Re Hearing on Salem/Hope Creek Nuclear Plant
ML1022805582009-10-12012 October 2009
Comment (4) of Gina Carola on Behalf of Sierra Club, Resolution Passed by New Jersey Chapter of Sierra Requesting NRC & New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Require Pse&G to Erect Cooling Towers
ML1022805562009-09-0707 September 2009
Comment (2) of Sidney J. Goodman Opposing on License Renewal for the Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants
ML1022805612009-09-0303 September 2009
Comment (7) of William R. Dunn, Supporting Salem and Hope Creek License Renewal Applications
ML0719402422007-06-0101 June 2007
Comment (1) of Patrick Mulligan on Behalf of New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, Regarding Hope Creek License Change Request (LCR) H05-01 Extended Power Uprate
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0333808232003-11-30030 November 2003
Comment (4) of Norm Cohen Re 30 Day Comment Extension on Draft Criteria That Would Codify Currently non-compliant Actions and Forgive Long Standing and Widespread Fire Protection Violations at Nuclear Power Stations
2024-07-29
[Table view] |
Text
NEW JERSEY SENATE STEPHEN M. SWEENEY Senate President Email: SenSweeney@njleg.org 6 ~
Please reply to: 4 Kingsway Commons, Suite 400 935 Kings Highway West Deptford, NJ 08086 Tel: (856) 251-9801 Fax: (856) 251-9752 0
14 E. Commerce Street Bridgeton, NJ 08302 Tel: (856) 455-1011 Fax: (856) 455-2853 0
199 East Broadway, Suite G Salem, NJ 08079 Tel: (856) 339-0808 Fax: (856) 339-9626 November 8, 2010 Cindy Bladey, Chief Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB)
Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration, MailStop: TWB-05-BO1M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 171 Q~.
C-C/')
%_n To Whom It May Concern:
As New Jersey's energy demainds continue to climb, the state will desperately need to find power from sources that can meet consumer demand without adding to the buildup of greenhouse gases. Not only is this need spelled out in the state's Energy Master Plan, but it is recognized by the many residents who already have turned to alternative energy for their own homes and..by policymakers - both in Washington and Trenton - who have sought to move us away from traditional fossil-fuel burning power plants.
While I am proud to have sponsored new law that will make New Jersey a national hub for offshore wind energy, the reality is that offshore wind and solar alone will not be able to ensure a steady, constant flow of clean power to consumers. That is why I support PSEG's application to construct a new nuclear generating facility in Salem County.
PSEG Nuclear has been a long-standing good neighbor to Salem and Cumberland counties and an exceptional corporate citizen for South Jersey, always acting in a clear and transparent fashion. Moreover, the company had provided more than 1,500 jobs for our residents at its current Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek stations - making PSEG Nuclear the largest employer in Salem County.
PSEG Nuclear is an important economic partner to Salem City and an active member of the South Jersey ChamberOf C.ommerce. The company has also supported our communities through its annual payment of more than $1.8 million in property taxes.
L) A) 5 1/ý -ýe4ll
~z
PSEG Nuclear has also worked closely with Salem Community College and the Salem County Vocational Technical School to create specialized training programs to ensure students have the skills necessary to get good jobs.
Construction of the proposed reactor would provide tangible economic benefits to the entire South Jersey reason, but to Salem and Cumberland counties in particular. With unemployment rates in both counties still above the statewide average, the region would be immediately and positively impacted by the creation of at least 1,400 - and as many as 2,400 - construction jobs. Once completed, the generation station would create between 400 and 700 permanent jobs that would pay well above the county average.
PSEG Nuclear's Salem facilities have always been operated in a safe and reliable manner. There is absolutely no reason to think this track record would change through the construction of a new generation facility.
It is for these reasons that I am proud to support PSEG's early site permit application.
Sincerely, Stephen M. Sweeney Senate President Third Legislative District SMS/ds
