Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARLR-N14-0224, License Amendment Request to Update Appendix B to the Renewed Facility Operating License2014-12-0909 December 2014
License Amendment Request to Update Appendix B to the Renewed Facility Operating License
Project stage: Request
ML15005A0172014-12-31031 December 2014
Update to Appendix B LAR Acceptance Review
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML15055A3772015-03-10010 March 2015
and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Request for Additional Information Request to Update Appendix B to Renewed Facility Operating License DPR-70, DPR-75 and NPF-57
Project stage: RAI
ML15099A7662015-04-0909 April 2015
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Update Appendix B to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML15138A1032015-04-29029 April 2015
Comment (1) of Christine Arnott Opposing Behalf of Delaware River Keeper on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
Project stage: Request
ML15132A6682015-06-0404 June 2015
Hc and Salem, Unit 1 and 2 - Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to the Proposed License Amendment to Update Appendix B to the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses
Project stage: Draft Other
ML15141A2712015-06-17017 June 2015
and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos.1 and 2, Issuance of Amendments Update of Appendix B to the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses
Project stage: Approval
ML15174A1272015-06-24024 June 2015
Correction to Amendment No. 198 Regarding Update of Appendix B to the Renewed Facility Operating License
Project stage: Other
2015-04-29
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML15138A1032015-04-29029 April 2015
Comment (1) of Christine Arnott Opposing Behalf of Delaware River Keeper on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML14356A1862014-12-16016 December 2014
Comment (26) of an Individual Opposing on Hope Creek and Salem Expanding Nuclear Power Facilities
ML13023A3842012-12-14014 December 2012
Comment (269) of Deborah W. Harris on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11266A1502011-09-21021 September 2011
Comment (6) of Christi Demark Opposed to the Proposal by PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Product Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek Generating Station
ML1100602872010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (5) of Grace Musumeci, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Draft Supplement 45 Regarding Hope Creek and Salem Units 1 & 2
ML1032300472010-11-0808 November 2010
Comment (1) of Stephen M. Sweeney on Behalf of New Jersey Senate, Supporting Pseg'S Application to Construct a New Nuclear Generating Facility in Salem County
ML1035104262010-11-0505 November 2010
Comment (1) of Marv Lewis on Proposal to Extend the Operating Life of Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plant Along with the Salem Units 1 & 2 by 20 Years Reeks with Betrayal of Responsibility to Protect the Public
ML1009500372010-04-0101 April 2010
Comment (5) of Leigh Davis, Dena Jaborska, Wenonah Hauter, Amy Goldsmith, Jeff Tittel, William Kibler, Jennifer Coffey & Norm Cohen on Behalf of Food & Water Watch Opposing Proposal of PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Produce Cobalt-60 at H
ML1009701262010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (3) of 243 Individuals Regarding Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order
ML1009205462010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Re-Licensing of Columbia Generating Station
ML1009205492010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (4) of David A. Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on the Proposal of PSEG to Load Cobalt-60 Producing Rods in Reactor Core at Hope Creek
ML1009205482010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (2) of William H. Day Supporting Proposal to Produce Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek
ML1009205472010-03-16016 March 2010
Comment (1) of William E. Morris on Pseg'S Plan to Produce Cobalt-60 Which Can Be Used to Promote and Maintain Human Health
ML1022805622009-11-30030 November 2009
Comment (8) of Norm Cohen, on Behalf of the Unplug Salem Campaign, on Environmental Review of the Relicensing of Hope Creek
ML1022805602009-11-0505 November 2009
Comment (6) of Fred Stine on Behalf of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network on PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem Generating Station
ML1022805552009-11-0404 November 2009
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Salem and Hope Nuclear Plants 20 Year License Extensions
ML1022805592009-11-0303 November 2009
Comment (5) of Ellen B. Pompper, on Behalf of Self, Supporting PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations
ML1022805572009-10-24024 October 2009
Comment (3) of David O. Rickards on Behalf of Instream Energy, LLC Re Hearing on Salem/Hope Creek Nuclear Plant
ML1022805582009-10-12012 October 2009
Comment (4) of Gina Carola on Behalf of Sierra Club, Resolution Passed by New Jersey Chapter of Sierra Requesting NRC & New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Require Pse&G to Erect Cooling Towers
ML1022805562009-09-0707 September 2009
Comment (2) of Sidney J. Goodman Opposing on License Renewal for the Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants
ML1022805612009-09-0303 September 2009
Comment (7) of William R. Dunn, Supporting Salem and Hope Creek License Renewal Applications
ML0719402422007-06-0101 June 2007
Comment (1) of Patrick Mulligan on Behalf of New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, Regarding Hope Creek License Change Request (LCR) H05-01 Extended Power Uprate
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0333808232003-11-30030 November 2003
Comment (4) of Norm Cohen Re 30 Day Comment Extension on Draft Criteria That Would Codify Currently non-compliant Actions and Forgive Long Standing and Widespread Fire Protection Violations at Nuclear Power Stations
2015-04-29
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 1 RULES I /HD ',JL)KKtIVES As of: 5/13/15 2:03 PM Received:
April 29, 2015 PUBLIC SUBMISSION 7ry 13 PM1 2: IStatus: PendingPost PUBL C S BM I SION13 H 2 11Tracking No. ljz-8ikk-dywk Comments Due: May 14, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2015-0088 Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Comment On: NRC-2015-0088-0001 Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Document:
NRC-2015-0088-DRAFT-0001 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08579 Submitter Information Name: Christine Arnott Address: 925 Canal Street Suite 3701 Bristol, PA, 19007 Email: christine@delawareriverkeeper.org General Comment See attached file(s)Attachments DRN LAR letter final SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= qsx~ (W-& f6d)https://www.
fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481 ac386b&for...
05/13/2015 DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORKK April 29, 2015 Ms. Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN- 12-H08 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 RE: Docket ID NRC-2015-0088, PSEG Nuclear LLC, Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 (Docket No.50-354), Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311), Salem County, New Jersey, Date of Amended request: December 9, 2014, Comments regarding License Amendment Request to revise Appendix B of the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses
Dear Ms. Parker,
The Delaware Riverkeeper Network urges you to deny the submitted license amendment request (LAR) by PSEG Nuclear LLC to revise Appendix B of the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for Salem Nuclear Generating Station andiHope Creek Generating Station. We disagree with the proposed determination that the amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration.
Furthermore, we request that a hearing be conducted regarding this LAR request and before the U.S: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issues the amendment.
This proposal by PSEG would eliminate the requirement to send an Annual Environmental Operating Report along with important notifications to your regulators at the NRC. Included among the requirements that PSEG wants to eliminate are reporting important information on fish kills and incidents involving endangered species, on unanticipated emergency discharge of wastewater or chemical substances, and on unusual environmental events. Furthermore, PSEG wants to stop reporting details on permit amendments or renewals involving pollution discharge permits overseen by New Jersey. This is particularly concerning because the State of New Jersey has allowed the plant to operate with an expired discharge permit since 2006. Due to the lack of continuous State oversight, any "duplication of reports" that currently occurs is necessary to ensure full compliance with regulations and full protection of the environment.
The NRC must consistently and aggressively enforce its regulations to protect the public and environment.
The Delaware Riverkeeper Network is opposed to this LAR, and we urge you to deny it.Furthermore, we request a hearing regarding this application so that the public is fully aware of the proposal and has an opportunity to speak on the possible effects any decision would have on impacted parties, communities, and individuals.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK 925 Canal Street, Suite 3701 Bristol, PA 19007 Office: (215) 369-1 188 fax: (215)369-1181 drn@delawareriverkeeper.org www.delawareriverkeeperorg Sincerely, Maya K. van Rossum the Delaware Riverkeeper cc: Prosanta Chowdhury, Michael Eudy, NRC Office of New Reactors Page 2 of 2
