|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML15138A1032015-04-29029 April 2015
Comment (1) of Christine Arnott Opposing Behalf of Delaware River Keeper on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML14356A1862014-12-16016 December 2014
Comment (26) of an Individual Opposing on Hope Creek and Salem Expanding Nuclear Power Facilities
ML13023A3842012-12-14014 December 2012
Comment (269) of Deborah W. Harris on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3932012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (97) of Donna Selquist on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3882012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (92) of Geri Collecchia on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11266A1502011-09-21021 September 2011
Comment (6) of Christi Demark Opposed to the Proposal by PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Product Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek Generating Station
ML1100602872010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (5) of Grace Musumeci, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Draft Supplement 45 Regarding Hope Creek and Salem Units 1 & 2
ML1032300472010-11-0808 November 2010
Comment (1) of Stephen M. Sweeney on Behalf of New Jersey Senate, Supporting Pseg'S Application to Construct a New Nuclear Generating Facility in Salem County
ML1035104262010-11-0505 November 2010
Comment (1) of Marv Lewis on Proposal to Extend the Operating Life of Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plant Along with the Salem Units 1 & 2 by 20 Years Reeks with Betrayal of Responsibility to Protect the Public
ML1009500372010-04-0101 April 2010
Comment (5) of Leigh Davis, Dena Jaborska, Wenonah Hauter, Amy Goldsmith, Jeff Tittel, William Kibler, Jennifer Coffey & Norm Cohen on Behalf of Food & Water Watch Opposing Proposal of PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Produce Cobalt-60 at H
ML1009701262010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (3) of 243 Individuals Regarding Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order
ML1009205462010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Re-Licensing of Columbia Generating Station
ML1009205492010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (4) of David A. Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on the Proposal of PSEG to Load Cobalt-60 Producing Rods in Reactor Core at Hope Creek
ML1009205482010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (2) of William H. Day Supporting Proposal to Produce Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek
ML1009205472010-03-16016 March 2010
Comment (1) of William E. Morris on Pseg'S Plan to Produce Cobalt-60 Which Can Be Used to Promote and Maintain Human Health
ML1022805622009-11-30030 November 2009
Comment (8) of Norm Cohen, on Behalf of the Unplug Salem Campaign, on Environmental Review of the Relicensing of Hope Creek
ML1022805602009-11-0505 November 2009
Comment (6) of Fred Stine on Behalf of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network on PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem Generating Station
ML1022805552009-11-0404 November 2009
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Salem and Hope Nuclear Plants 20 Year License Extensions
ML1022805592009-11-0303 November 2009
Comment (5) of Ellen B. Pompper, on Behalf of Self, Supporting PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations
ML1022805572009-10-24024 October 2009
Comment (3) of David O. Rickards on Behalf of Instream Energy, LLC Re Hearing on Salem/Hope Creek Nuclear Plant
ML1022805582009-10-12012 October 2009
Comment (4) of Gina Carola on Behalf of Sierra Club, Resolution Passed by New Jersey Chapter of Sierra Requesting NRC & New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Require Pse&G to Erect Cooling Towers
ML1022805562009-09-0707 September 2009
Comment (2) of Sidney J. Goodman Opposing on License Renewal for the Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants
ML1022805612009-09-0303 September 2009
Comment (7) of William R. Dunn, Supporting Salem and Hope Creek License Renewal Applications
ML0719402422007-06-0101 June 2007
Comment (1) of Patrick Mulligan on Behalf of New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, Regarding Hope Creek License Change Request (LCR) H05-01 Extended Power Uprate
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0333808232003-11-30030 November 2003
Comment (4) of Norm Cohen Re 30 Day Comment Extension on Draft Criteria That Would Codify Currently non-compliant Actions and Forgive Long Standing and Widespread Fire Protection Violations at Nuclear Power Stations
2015-04-29
[Table view] |
Text
Mendiola, Doris From: Sent: To:
Subject:
To: the NRC: Marn Lewis [marvlewis@juno.com]
Friday, November 05, 2010 8:27 AM Perkins, Leslie Please add my letter to the statements in the Docket ID 2009-0390 2009-0390 ith the following and wish to join in these comments.C)CO
Subject:
docket ID NRC-: I , Marvin Lewis, agree w The proposal to extend the operating life of the Hope Creek nuclear plant along with the Salem I and Salem II by 20 years reeks with betrayal of responsibility to protect the public.Nothing lasts forever. When an automobile wears out, it is replaced.
When a nuclear plant wears, it becomes a multi-billion dollar or trillion dollar threat to the public safety and the general economy.Not only are these particular aging nuclear plants a threat in ordinary terms, but they are built in a seismic area. These plants are built on soft ground.They are on Artificial Island in the Delaware River. It was named "Artificial" because it was man-made with filled in land. There is a swamp on one side of the island with the river on the other side. There is no solid rock underneath.
Borings were made up to 100 feet deep. No rock was found. The reactors are built on pilings similar to the pilings in a collapsed Shanghai City building.Like so many nuclear facilities, these three nukes are close to an earthquake fault that rumbled on February 3, 2009. The noise of geological shocks in February, terrified people in Morris County who thought the shocks were explosions as reported by The Star Ledger.The Morris County (NJ) quake had an intensity of 3.0. That was a small event according to the US Geological Survey. But much more intense earthquakes may happen and the ability to be absolutely sure of their impact is hardly secure regardless of a know-it all attitude.
Earthquakes occur a few times a year in New Jersey. Most are so small that they are hardly noticed. A biggie can happen in a hundred years or tomorrow.In Japan, seven reactors at the Kashiwazi-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Japan were shut down due to an earthquake, fire and nuclear leak. People were killed and injured by the 6.8 magnitude quake, which struck in July, 2007. A new fire at the still shut down plant occurred in March, 2009. 600,000 residents signed a petition opposing restart of the plant.6 & /15k- -q / 3-~ ~#2:~ '-i' -~9:3 1 It seems that the NRC has put its head in the sand about a possible seismic threat to these three nukes, just as it has ignored many other credible threats, and has routinely rubber stamped 20 year extensions for every other nuclear plant application.
For once in your life, do the right thing. Reject this reckless proposal for a 20 year operating extension.
Very truly yours, Marvin Lewis R. P. E.(Retired) 3133 Fairfield St.Phila., PA 19136 215 676 1291 marvlewis(ciuno.com 2
