ML060580568
| ML060580568 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 03/07/2006 |
| From: | Terao D Plant Licensing Branch III-2 |
| To: | Naslund C D Union Electric Co |
| Terao D, NRR/DLPM, 415-3317 | |
| References | |
| TAC MC8176 | |
| Download: ML060580568 (6) | |
Text
March 7, 2006Mr. Charles D. Naslund Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company Post Office Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251
SUBJECT:
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - AUTHORIZATION OF RELIEF REQUESTNO. I3R-03 FOR SNUBBER VISUAL EXAMINATION AND FUNCTIONALTESTING RELATED TO THE THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM (TAC NO. MC8176)
Dear Mr. Naslund:
By letter dated August 10, 2005 (UL NRC-05185), Union Electric Company proposed analternative to the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, 1998 Edition up to and including the 2000 Addenda, with regard to visual examination and functional testing of snubbers for the Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (Callaway). This is Relief Request (RR) I3R-03. Union Electric Company requested to use the snubber surveillance program requirements as defined in Section 16.7.2of the Callaway Final Safety Analysis Report in lieu of the applicable ASME Code requirements specified in Section XI, Article IWF-5000, for the third 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) interval for Callaway.Based on the enclosed safety evaluation, the alternative to the requirements in Section XI ofthe ASME Code in RR I3R-03 provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Based on this, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), the Commission authorizes the proposed alternative in the relief request for the third 10-year ISI interval at Callaway.Sincerely,/RA/David Terao, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-483
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page March 7, 2006Mr. Charles D. Naslund Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company Post Office Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251
SUBJECT:
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - AUTHORIZATION OF RELIEF REQUESTNO. I3R-03 FOR SNUBBER VISUAL EXAMINATION AND FUNCTIONALTESTING RELATED TO THE THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM (TAC NO. MC8176)
Dear Mr. Naslund:
By letter dated August 10, 2005 (UL NRC-05185), Union Electric Company proposed analternative to the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, 1998 Edition up to and including the 2000 Addenda, with regard to visual examination and functional testing of snubbers for the Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (Callaway). This is Relief Request (RR) I3R-03. Union Electric Company requested to use the snubber surveillance program requirements as defined in Section 16.7.2of the Callaway Final Safety Analysis Report in lieu of the applicable ASME Code requirements specified in Section XI, Article IWF-5000, for the third 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) interval for Callaway.Based on the enclosed safety evaluation, the alternative to the requirements in Section XI ofthe ASME Code in RR I3R-03 provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Based on this, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), the Commission authorizes the proposed alternative in the relief request for the third 10-year ISI interval at Callaway.Sincerely,/RA/
David Terao, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-483
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION
- PUBLICRidsNrrDprRidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter LPLIV ReadingRidsNrrPMJDonohewALee RidsNrrDorl (CHaney/CHolden)RidsNrrLALFeizollahiKManoly RidsNrrDorlLplg (DTerao)RidsRegion4MailCenter (BJones)RidsOgcRpACCESSION NO.: ML060580568OFFICENRR/LPL4/PMNRR/LPL4/LAEEMB/BCOGCNRR/LPL4/BCNAMEJDonohewLFeizollahiKManolyMWoodsDTerao DATE2/28/062/28/0602/07/20063/2/063/7/06DOCUMENT NAME: E:\Filenet\ML060580568.wpdOFFICIAL RECORD COPY SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO INSERVICE INSPECTION (ISI) PROGRAM RELIEF REQUEST NO. I3R-03SNUBBER VISUAL EXAMINATION AND FUNCTIONAL TESTINGFOR THE THIRD 10-YEAR ISI INTERVALUNION ELECTRIC COMPANYCALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1DOCKET NO. 50-48
31.0INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 10, 2005, Union Electric Company (the licensee) proposed an alternativeto the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and PressureVessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power PlantComponents," 1998 Edition up to and including the 2000 Addenda, Article IWF-5000, with regard to snubber ISI activities at the Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (Callaway). This is Relief Request (RR) I3R-03. ASME Code,Section XI, paragraphs IWF-5300(a) and IWF-5300(b), reference the 1988 Addenda to ASME/American National Standards Institute (ANSI) OM-1987, Part 4 (OMa-4, 1988), for snubber visual examination and functional testing. In addition, paragraphs IWF-5200(c) and IWF-5300(c) require that integral and non-integral attachments for snubbers, including lugs, bolting, pins, and clamps be examined in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code,Section XI, Subsection IWF.In RR I3R-03, the licensee requested that visual examination and functional testing of snubbersbe performed using the Callaway Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Section 16.7.2, "Snubbers," in lieu of the ASME Code requirements in ASME Code Section XI, Article IWF-5000. The alternative was requested for the third 10-year ISI interval at Callaway Plant.
Callaway FSAR, Chapter 16, lists requirements on systems and components withSection 16.7.2 being specifically on snubbers and the snubber requirements being in the form of a limiting condition for operation (LCO), applicability to the reactor modes, specified actionswhen the snubber LCO is not being met, and the surveillance requirements on the snubbers. This FSAR format follows the format of the Callaway Technical Specifications (TSs) per Section 50.36 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), but these FSARrequirements are not part of the TSs. The licensee stated that the ASME Code of record for Callaway for inservice examination andtesting of snubbers is the 1998 Edition up to and including the 2000 Addenda of the ASME Code,Section XI.
2.0REGULATORY EVALUATION
The regulations governing the ISI of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components state that theISI must be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Code and applicable edition and addenda as required by 10 CFR 50.55a(g), except where specific written relief has been granted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i). Paragraph 50.55a(a)(3) of 10 CFR states that alternatives to the requirements of paragraph (g)may be used, when authorized by the NRC's Director of the Office of Nuclear ReactorRegulation, if the licensee demonstrates that: (i) the proposed alternatives would provide anacceptable level of quality and safety, or (ii) compliance with the specified requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4), ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components (includingsupports) shall meet the requirements, except the design and access provisions and the pre-service examination requirements, set forth in the ASME Code,Section XI, to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry, and materials of construction of the components. The regulations require that the inservice examination of com ponents and systempressure tests conducted during the first 10-year interval and subsequent intervals comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of Section XI of the ASME Code incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) 12 months prior to the start of the 120-month interval, subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein. The applicable edition of Section XI of the ASME Code for the Callaway Plant's third 10-year ISI interval is the 1998 Edition up to and including the 2000 Addenda.
3.0TECHNICAL EVALUATION
The NRC's findings with respect to the proposed alternatives and the licensee's RR I3R-03 forCallaway pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a are given below.3.1Licensee Relief RequestThe licensee requested authorization of an alternative to the requirements in the ASME Code,Section XI, paragraphs IWF-5300(a) and IWF-5300(b), for visual examination and functional testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 snubbers, and IWF-5300(c) for integral and non-integral attachments for snubbers, at Callaway. 3.2Code RequirementsASME Code,Section XI, paragraph IWF-5300(a), requires that snubber inservice examinationsbe performed in accordance with OMa-4, 1988, using the VT-3 visual examination method described in IWA-2213. Paragraph IWF-5300(b) requires that snubber functional testing be performed in accordance with OMa-4, 1988. Paragraph IWF-5300(c) requires that integral and non-integral attachments for snubbers, including lugs, bolting, pins, and clamps be examined in accordance with Subsection IWF. 3.3Licensee's Proposed AlternativeSnubber examinations and tests at Callaway are currently performed in accordance with theprogram described in Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2. To resolve the conflict with the ASME Code,Section XI, requirements, the licensee requested relief from the requirements ofArticle IWF-5000 (Subarticles IWF-5200 and IWF-5300) to allow snubbers to continue to be tested in accordance with Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2, in lieu of the noted Code requirements. 3.4Licensee's Basis for Requesting ReliefVisual Snubber ExaminationsThe Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2.1.1.a, lists visual examination requirements for snubbersthat are compatible with Section XI VT-3 requirements. IWF-5000 requires that examinationsbe performed using the VT-3 visual examination method described in IWA-2213, which reads as follows (stated in the licensee's application):VT-3 examinations are conducted to determine the general mechanical andstructural condition of components and their supports by verifying parameters such as clearance, settings, and physical displacements; and to detect discontinuities and imperfections, such as loss of integrity at bolted or welded connections, loose or missing parts, debris, corrosion, wear, or erosion. VT-3 includes examinations for conditions that could affect operability or functi onaladequacy of snubbers and constant load and spring supports. The licensee stated in its application dated August 10, 2005, that the Callaway FSAR,Section 16.7.2.1.1.c, has the following statement:Visual inspections shall verify that: (1) There are no visible indications of damageor impaired OPERABILITY, (2) Attachments to the foundation or support structure are functional, and (3) Fasteners for the attachment of the snubber to the component and to the snubber anchorage are functional.The licensee stated that the Callaway procedure that implements the FSARsnubber inspections identifies the following as unacceptable conditions:Indication of damage or impaired operabilityDysfunctional attachments to foundation or supporting structureDysfunctional fasteners securing snubber to component and foundationor supporting structureDamage, deterioration, or deformation of snubber, snubber attachment,structural steel or concreteExtensive corrosion on the support cylinder or housing snap ringArc strikes anywhere on the component supportWeld or paint splatter or other roughness of the support cylinderlocated in an area which could impede movement of the snubberObvious signs of binding Missing bolts, load pins, connections or other type of fasteners whichare designed to be under loadWeld cracksDysfunctional load pinsFully dislodged spherical bearingsPiping or component interference with snubber unless interference is inthe designed direction of motionRotational binding that prevents the snubber from moving as designed.Missing cotter pins or locking devicesInsulation interferencesThe licensee stated that the differences between the requirements of IWA-2213 and theCallaway FSAR are primarily semantic in nature and that the intent and scope of the twodocuments are essentially equal, although the ASME Code wording is more detailed than the FSAR in listing specific items to be included. The licensee explained further that those items are intuitive to meeting the FSAR requirements and are more specifically addressed in the implementing procedure that closely parallels the ASME Code listing, and the FSAR examinations are performed by personnel that are qualified to perform VT-3 examinations per IWA-2300.The licensee stated that the Callaway FSAR also incorporates the reduced visual examinationfrequency table as provided in NRC Generic Letter 90-09, "Alternative Requirements forSnubber Visual Inspection Intervals and Corrective Actions," dated December 11, 1990. The licensee explained that this reduced frequency results in a significant reduction in unnecessary radiological exposure to plant personnel, a savings in company resources, and compliance with visual examination requirements while maintaining the same confidence level in snubber operability as that provided by following ASME Code,Section XI, requirements. ASME Code,Section XI, IWF-5300(c), requires that integral and non-integral attachments beexamined, but Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2, makes no distinction between integral and non-integral attachments and both integral and non-integral attachments are included in theexamination to verify overall structural integrity. The licensee stated that visual inspections performed in accordance with FSAR, Section 16.7.2, verify that (1) there are no visible indications of damage or impaired operability, (2) attachments to the foundation or supportingstructure are secure, and (3) fasteners for the attachment of the snubber to the component and to the snubber anchorage are functional. Because the NRC staff considers that the aboveFSAR, Section 16.7.2, visual inspections provide an equivalent examination for the integral andnon-integral attachments as required by IWF-5300(c), the NRC staff concludes that the FSAR,Section 16.7.2, visual inspections are acceptable.Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the snubber visual examination program, asprovided in the Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2, meets the intent of the ASME Code,Section XI,in the areas of scope of examination, method of examination, subsequent examination interval,and personnel qualifications for VT-3 and, therefore, the NRC staff concludes that thealternative snubber visual examination program is acceptable. Snubber Functional TestingThe licensee stated in its application dated August 10, 2005, that the Callaway FSAR,Section 16.7.2 .1.1, testing requirements for snubbers are compatible with OMa-4, 1988. The licensee also stated that OMa-4, 1988, had the statement that snubber operational readinesstest shall verify the following:a.activation is within the specified range of velocity or acceleration intension and in compression; b.release rate, when applicable, is within the specified range in tension andin compression. For units specifically required not to displace under continuous load, ability of the snubber to withstand load withoutdisplacement;c.for mechanical snubbers, drag force is within specified limits, in tensionand in compression.The licensee further stated that, in accordance with the Callaway FSAR, the snubber functionaltest shall verify that:a.Activation (restraining action) is achieved within the specified range inboth tension and compression;b.Snubber bleed, or release rate where required, is present in both tensionand compression, within the specified range, andc.For mechanical snubbers, the force required to initiate or maintain motionof the snubber is within the specified range in both directions of travel.The licensee explained that testing methods may be used to measure parameters other thanthose specified, if those results can be correlated to the specified parameters throughestablished methods.At least once per 18 months, a representative sample of snubbers of each type shall be testedusing either the 10 percent Plan or the 37 Plan. For the 10 percent Plan, each snubber of atype that does not meet the functional test acceptance criteria of Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2.1.1.f, an additional 10 percent of that type of snubber shall be functional testeduntil no more failure is found or until all snubbers of that type have been functionally tested. For the 37 Plan, a representative sample of 37 snubbers for each snubber type shall be functionally tested in accordance with FSAR, Figure 16.7-1, wherein "C" is the total number of snubbers of a type found not meeting the acceptance requirements of FSAR, Section 16.7.2.1.1.f. Thecumulative number of snubbers of a type tested is denoted by "N." At the end of each day's testing, the new value of "N" and "C" (previous day's total plus current day's increments) shall be plotted on Figure 16.7-1. If at any time the point plotted falls in the "Accept" region, testingof that type of snubber may be terminated. When the point plotted lies in the "ContinuousTesting" region, additional snubbers of that type shall be tested until the point falls in the "Accept" region or all the snubbers of that type have been tested. The licensee stated that the Callaway FSAR snubber testing program provides forcomprehensive and conservative requirements that are effective in providing a reliable snubber population, which results in increased confidence in plant safety. The licensee explained that the use of the Callaway FSAR addresses the intent and scope of the requirements of ASMECode,Section XI, Article IWF-5000, in a single governing document that can be consistentlyapplied.Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the snubber functional testing program, asprovided in Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2, meets the intent of the ASME Code,Section XI, inthe areas of testing requirements, as well as sampling of testing and subsequent sample expansion and, therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the alternative snubber functionaltesting program is acceptable.ConclusionBased on the above evaluation, the NRC staff finds that snubber visual examinations andfunctional testing, conducted in accordance with Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2, provide reasonable assurance of snubber operability equivalent to that of the ASME Code,Section XI. Based on this, the NRC staff finds that the licensee's proposed alternative provides anacceptable level of quality and safety with respect to snubber visual inspection and functional testing. It should be noted that in authorizing Relief Request No. I3R-03, FSAR, Section 16.7.2,becomes a regulatory requirement that may be used in lieu of ASME Code,Section XI, requirements for performing inservice inspection and functional testing of snubbers. Any future changes to these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the NRC staff forauthorization pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3) or as an exemption pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12.
4.0CONCLUSION
Based on the above evaluation and the information provided by the licensee in its application,the NRC staff concludes that the proposed alternative to use Callaway FSAR, Section 16.7.2,for snubber visual inspection and functional testing provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Therefore, based on this and pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), the licensee's alternative in RR I3R-03 is authorized for the Callaway third 10-year ISI interval.Principal Contributor: Arnold Lee Date: March 7, 2006 Callaway Plant, Unit 1 cc:Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc.
19041 Raines Drive Derwood, MD 20855John O'Neill, Esq.Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037Mr. Mark A. Reidmeyer, RegionalRegulatory Affairs Supervisor Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionResident Inspector Office
8201 NRC RoadSteedman, MO 65077-1302Mr. Les H. KanuckelManager, Quality Assurance AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251Missouri Public Service CommissionGovernor Office Building 200 Madison Street Jefferson City, MO 65102-0360Regional Administrator, Region IVU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4005Mr. H. Floyd GilzowDeputy Director for Policy Missouri Department of Natural Resources
P. O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176Mr. Rick A. MuenchPresident and Chief Executive Officer Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KA 66839Mr. Dan I. Bolef, PresidentKay Drey, Representative Board of Directors Coalition for the Environment 6267 Delmar Boulevard University City, MO 63130Mr. Lee Fritz, Presiding CommissionerCallaway County Court House 10 East Fifth Street Fulton, MO 65151Mr. David E. Shafer Superintendent, Licensing Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 66149, MC 470 St. Louis, MO 63166-6149Mr. Keith D. YoungManager, Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251Mr. Keith G. Henke, PlannerDivision of Community and Public Health Office of Emergency Coordination 930 Wildwood P.O. Box 570 Jefferson City, MO 65102Certrec Corporation4200 South Hulen, Suite 630 Fort Worth, TX 76109Director, Missouri State Emergency Management Agency
P.O. Box 116 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0116