Letter Sequence Request |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML14092A0232014-03-31031 March 2014 Entergy'S Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima... Project stage: Response to RAI ML14357A0612014-12-16016 December 2014 Pilgrim'S Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi A Project stage: Response to RAI ML15132A0652015-04-0909 April 2015 NRR E-mail Capture - FW: Feedback --- Pilgrim ESEP Report Clarification Questions Project stage: Request ML15161A5032015-06-10010 June 2015 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Technical Review Checklist Related to Interim Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Supporting NTTF Recommendation 2.1, Seismic Project stage: Other ML15154A9752015-06-16016 June 2015 Staff Review of Interim Evaluation Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Project stage: Approval 2015-04-09
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22335A2802022-11-0404 November 2022 11-4-2022 Email Transmitting Draft Questions Pertaining to Pilgrim ISFSI Exemption Request ML22270A0422022-09-26026 September 2022 Acknowledgement Email for Holtec'S Request for Reporting Exemption with Regards to the Pilgrim ISFSI Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (Docket No. 05000293) ML22154A1622022-05-26026 May 2022 Letter and Email from Save Our Bay/Diane Turco Regarding Irradiated Water Release from Pilgrim ML22007A2602021-12-0606 December 2021 E-mail from P. O'Brien, Holtec, to A. Snyder, NRC, on Pilgrim Effluent Discharge ML21287A6192021-10-14014 October 2021 E-mail from S. Phillips, MEMA, to A. Snyder, NRC, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consultation Response to Amendment Review for Emergency Preparedness ML21266A2512021-09-23023 September 2021 Consultation with Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Amendment Application for Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Levels ML21266A2772021-09-23023 September 2021 HDI Clarification of Exemption Requested from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, Section Iii.E ML21267A0012021-09-23023 September 2021 E-mail from A. Snyder, NRC, to A. Sterdis, Holtec, - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, Section Iii.E Acceptance Review ML21257A3832021-09-15015 September 2021 E-mail from A. Snyder, NRC, to A. Sterdis, Holtec, - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Follow-on Request Re Request for Additional Information 2 Pilgrim - License Amendment Request Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Pl ML21211A5912021-07-22022 July 2021 Consultation Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Technical Specifications ML21211A5162021-07-22022 July 2021 Consultation Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Physical Security Plan ML21200A2352021-07-13013 July 2021 Consultation Request to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Technical Specifications ML21200A1522021-07-13013 July 2021 Consultation Request to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim Isfi Only Physical Security Plan ML21176A1842021-06-25025 June 2021 Email from HDI Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Training ML21180A0582021-06-17017 June 2021 Email from Region I Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Inspection - EA-13-132 ML21097A0402021-04-0606 April 2021 E-Mail Consult with Commonwealth of Mass Re - Amendment Application - Physical Security Plan for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station L-20-092, Email Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station-Exemption from Annual Force-On-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B,2020-12-10010 December 2020 Email Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station-Exemption from Annual Force-On-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, L-20-096, Supplemental Information to Support Physical Security Plan Revision and License Amendment Request to Incorporate Alternate Measures - Holtec Email Dated December 10, 20102020-12-10010 December 2020 Supplemental Information to Support Physical Security Plan Revision and License Amendment Request to Incorporate Alternate Measures - Holtec Email Dated December 10, 2010 ML20328A2982020-11-16016 November 2020 Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts on No Significant Hazard for Pilgrim ISFSI Amendment to Address ISFSI II Dated November 16, 2020 ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20163A6802020-06-11011 June 2020 Confirmation of the Scope of the Requested Regulatory Relief for Pilgrim Security Qualifications ML20280A1912020-04-17017 April 2020 Request for Additional Information- Clarifying Information for Pilgrim ISFSI Physical Security Amendment Application ML20269A3542020-03-0505 March 2020 CFR 26.717 Reports 2019 Transmittal Email ML19336A0302019-11-27027 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Re 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding ML19336A0332019-11-26026 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - E-mail to Petitioner - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)- Issuance of Final Director'S Decision ML19331A1952019-11-21021 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Commonwealth Consultation Response - Amendment Regarding Site Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML19331A1732019-11-12012 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Cyber Security Plan ML19331A1642019-11-0505 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Site Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML19331A1792019-11-0505 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - EA and Fonsi for Pilgrim Emergency Planning Exemption CY-19-007, LTR-19-0441 Henrietta Cosentino, E-mail SECY-19-0078 Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station2019-11-0404 November 2019 LTR-19-0441 Henrietta Cosentino, E-mail SECY-19-0078 Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19275H1962019-09-24024 September 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications (PDTS) ML19239A0372019-08-26026 August 2019 E-mail from Entergy Dated August 26, 2019, Notification of Pilgrim License Transfer ML19239A0262019-08-23023 August 2019 LTR-19-0330 Janet Azarovitz, E-mail a Plea for More Time and Reasonable Discussion Including the Citizens of the Commonwealth in the Sale of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19234A2072019-08-20020 August 2019 LTR-19-0328 Lawrence Delafield, President, Six Ponds Improv Assoc., Plymouth, Ma, Ltr Requests NRC to Postpone Consideration of Transferring the Licenses for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Until the NRC Has Answered Concerns by Pilgrim Watch, Se ML19232A4032019-08-20020 August 2019 LTR-19-0322 Diane Turco, Director, Cape Downwinders, Massachusetts, Letter/E-mail Requests Suspension of the Pilgrim License Transfer from Entergy to Holtec Until the Adjudicatory Hearing Is Held and Raised Contentions Are Resolved ML19308A9942019-08-19019 August 2019 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Confirmatory Order Rescission Supplemental Information ML19226A3912019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - EA and Fonsi for Pilgrim Decommissioning Trust Fund Exemption (Holtec) ML19226A3962019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Conforming Amendment in Support of Pilgrim License Transfer Application ML19226A1212019-08-13013 August 2019 OEDO-15-00479-2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - Status (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML19227A1032019-08-0707 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Draft Wording for Potential Condition of License Transfer Order ML19207B3662019-07-26026 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - RAI Direct and Indirect Transfer of Lic.; Conforming Lic. Amend.; Req. for Exemption 10 CFR 50.82(A)(8)(I)(A) for Holtec Decom. International, Llc ML19176A3452019-06-25025 June 2019 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - Information (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML19154A0652019-06-0303 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - Permanent Cessation of Power Operations ML19154A5242019-06-0303 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - RAI - Pilgrim Post-Decommissioning Technical Specifications (PDTS) License Amendment Request (LAR) ML19161A2122019-05-20020 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Remove Cyber Security Plan Requirements ML19123A0332019-05-0101 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Logbook Entry: 05/01/2019 Endangered Species Report Regarding a Confirmed Sighting of North Atlantic Right Whale(S) (Balaena Glacialis) ML19122A4912019-04-29029 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Logbook Entry: 04/29/2019 Regarding the Confirmed Sighting of Ten North Atlantic Right Whales (Balaena Glacialis) ML19108A2372019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action, Proposed Exemptions from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) - On-Site Property Damage Insurance ML19108A2362019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action, Proposed Exemptions from 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) - Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance 2022-09-26
[Table view] |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Drake, Richard S [RDrake@entergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:49 AM To: Wyman, Stephen
Subject:
FW: Feedback --- RE: Pilgrim ESEP Report Clarification Questionshere the resent offiical email From: Drake, Richard S [mailto:RDrake@entergy.com
] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 12:11 PM To: DiFrancesco, Nicholas Cc: Morgan, Nadiyah; Wyman, Stephen; Devlin-Gill, Stephanie; Ford, Bryan
Subject:
RE: Inquiry RE: Pilgrim ESEP Report Clarification Questions Nick, Here are the Responses to the Clarification Questions from Pilgrim
Question 1 ESEP Report Section 6.2 describes ESEL component screening using Table 2-4 of EPRI NP-6041-SL. This table is applicable to components located up to 40 ft above grade. The ESEP report is silent concerning screening or HCLPF calculations at elevations beyond 40 ft above grade. Please describe how ESEL components located at elevations beyond 40 ft above grade either were screened or had their HCLPF capacities calculated, including specific references for the applicable guidance utilized.
Response: The Pilgrim ESEL contains two components located more than 40 ft above grade (above elevation 62.5 ft);
C129B Containment Pressure Switch Instrument Rack and PT-1001-89A Drywell Pressure Transmitter. These components are located at elevation 74' and were screened in accordance with section 4 of EPRI 1019200 "Seismic Fragility Applications Guide Update". A HCLPF capacity of 1.5*reference spectrum was compared to demand from review level ground motion in-structure response spectra at elevation 74'. The screening and evaluation sheets from the walkdowns show the components as flagged to be 40 ft above grade and evaluated using the appropriate criteria.
Question 2 In ESEP Report Section 5.2, it states "The vertical direction RLGM ISRS is obtained by scaling the vertical amplified ground response spectrum." The statement implies that the vertical ground spectrum, scaled by a factor of 2, is used at all elevations. Describe in more detail the scaling procedure used to obtain the vertical RLGM ISRS. Please provide the technical basis.
Response: The factor of 2 used for scaling the vertical direction is based on using the maximum scaling factor for the GMRS/SSE ratio in accordance with Section 4 of EPRI 3002000704. The scaled vertical ground spectrum is considered for all elevations within the plant. This approach is consistent with Pilgrim's seismic design basis as described in UFSAR Section 12.2.3.5.1, Seismic Design Basis Document TDBD-118, and Seismic Response Spectra Specification C114ERQE0. See excerpt below from TDBD-118:
3.1.2.3 Vertical Response UFSAR Section 12.2.3.5.1 states "The vertical acceleration is equal to two-thirds of the horizontal ground acceleration". This statement applies to seismic design of the building structures, and to equipment supported by the building structures. Building structures were assumed to exhibit rigid range response when subjected to vertical ground motion, and vertical floor spectra were not calc ulated, This approach was derived from guidance contained in TID-7024, Section 21.3. (References 5.4.8.3 and 5.5.1.4.1). Although different from current practice, it is considered to be an approved part of the PNPS design basis.
If you have further questions please contact me by email or we can set up a conference call.
Richard S. Drake, PE Civil/Structural Design Engineering Supervisor Fukushima Fleet Seismic Lead Indian Point Energy Center l Design Engineering 450 Broadway Buchanan, NY 10511
Email: rdrake@entergy.com From: DiFrancesco, Nicholas [1]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:10 PM To: Drake, Richard S Cc: Morgan, Nadiyah; Wyman, Stephen; Devlin-Gill, Stephanie; Ford, Bryan
Subject:
Inquiry RE: Pilgrim ESEP Report Clarification Questions Mr. Drake, In follow-up to an afternoon voicemail, as part of the NRC review of the Pilgrim ESEP report, the staff would appreciate clarification on the following technical items:
Question 1 ESEP Report Section 6.2 describes ESEL component screening using Table 2-4 of EPRI NP-6041-SL.
This table is applicable to components located up to 40 ft above grade. The ESEP report is silent concerning screening or HCLPF calculations at elevations beyond 40 ft above grade. Please describe how ESEL components located at elevations beyond 40 ft above grade either were screened or had their HCLPF capacities calculated, including specific references for the applicable guidance utilized.
Question 2
In ESEP Report Section 5.2, it states "The vertical direction RLGM ISRS is obtained by scaling the vertical amplified ground response spectrum." The statement implies that the vertical ground spectrum, scaled by a factor of 2, is used at all elevations. Describe in more detail the scaling procedure used to obtain the vertical RLGM ISRS. Please provide the technical basis.
An email response will likely be sufficient to support the ESEP report review. A response around March 18, if practicable, would be greatly appreciated to support the established review schedule.
Please let me or Steve Wyman (at 301-415-3041) know if you would like to schedule a clarification call or any have questions and concerns.
Thanks, Nick Senior Project Manager - Seismic Reevaluation Activities U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Japan Lesson Learned Project Division 3nicholas.difrancesco@nrc.gov l Tel: (301) 415-1115
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2057 Mail Envelope Properties (BB9638327BFF0242A8D4637611C4F3163A22CA36)
Subject:
FW: Feedback --- RE: Pilgrim ESEP Report Clarification Questions Sent Date: 4/9/2015 11:48:53 AM Received Date: 4/9/2015 11:49:31 AM From: Drake, Richard S Created By: RDrake@entergy.com Recipients: "Wyman, Stephen" <Stephen.Wyman@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
Post Office: litxmetsp004.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5652 4/9/2015 11:49:31 AM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: