Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Start dateReporting criterionTitleEvent descriptionSystemLER
ENS 4036229 November 2003 04:02:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge
Automatic Scram Due to Low Reactor Water LevelAt 2202 CST, a low Reactor Water Level Scram (Level 3) occurred due to lowering feedwater flow. All control rods inserted on the Scram. The Scram resulted in actuation of HPCI and RCIC on low Reactor Water level (Level 2), and the low level ATWS Recirculation Pump Trip (RPT). HPCI and RCIC initiated and both Reactor Recirculation pumps tripped. It is estimated that RCIC injected approximately 500 to 600 gallons, and HPCI injected less than 100 gallons. HPCI was secured early in the transient, and RCIC operated for approximately 2 minutes. Reactor Water level was recovered and maintained with the operating feedwater pump. The Reactor Water low level (Level 3) also resulted in Group 2 (Primary Containment), Group 3 (Reactor Water Cleanup), and Group 6 isolations (Secondary Containment Isolation and Control Room Ventilation system start). All isolations functioned as designed. Initial indications are that Feedwater Pump B speed lowered unexpectedly, causing Reactor Water level to lower. Reactor Water level reached -44 inches (wide range instruments) (120 inches above top of active fuel). The setpoints for HPCI, RCIC, and ATWS-RPT are -33 inches. Plans are to take the unit to Mode 4. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Feedwater
Secondary containment
Primary containment
Reactor Recirculation Pump
Reactor Water Cleanup
Control Rod
ENS 4160115 April 2005 09:36:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge
Reactor Scram and Specified System ActuationsThis is both a four hour and eight hour report for the following event: 4 hour Non-Emergency for ECCS Discharge to the RCS and RPS Actuation; 8 hour Non-Emergency for Groups 2 & 6. Also, HPCI (High Pressure Coolant Injection) was placed in pull-to-lock, thereby making HPCI unavailable. At 0436 (hrs.) CDT 04/15/2005, Cooper Nuclear Station experienced a reactor feed water level transient followed by reactor vessel water level low level alarm and an automatic scram. HPCI and RCIC (Reactor Core Isolation Cooling) automatically initiated and injected into the reactor vessel. Groups 2, 3, and 6 actuated on low reactor water level. Both reactor recirculation pumps tripped and RWCU (Reactor Water Clean-Up system) isolated. Reactor vessel water level reached approximately (minus) 70 inches (instrument zero, approximately 90 inches of water remained above the fuel) and recovered after HPCI and RCIC had begun to inject. All post-scram automatic actions were as expected. HPCI was placed in pull-to-lock to prevent over feeding. The plant is being cooled down to establish natural circulation flow and permit recovery of recirculation pumps. Investigation into the cause of the reactor feed water level transient is ongoing. All rods inserted during the scram. No safety relief valves lifted during the transient. All group isolation signals have been reset. The electrical grid is stable. Decay heat is being removed via steam dumps to the main condenser. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Reactor Recirculation Pump
Safety Relief Valve
Main Condenser
05000298/LER-2005-001
ENS 4201023 September 2005 05:40:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor Scram Due to Degrading Main Condenser VacuumAt 0040 hours Central Daylight Time, Cooper Nuclear Station was manually scrammed due to degrading main condenser vacuum. Subsequent to the scram, reactor vessel level lowered to minus 20 inches wide range which corresponds to approximately 140 inches above the top of fuel. A Primary Containment Isolation System (PCIS) group 2 isolation occurred as expected due to the level transient. All automatic actions occurred as expected. This report includes both a 4 hour and an 8 hour report. The 4 hour report is being made pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(iv)(b), Actuation of RPS when the reactor is critical. The 8 hour report is being made pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(iv)(a), Actuation of PCIS group 2 due to expected RPV low level following the scram. The NRC Resident Inspector has been informed of the event. All control rods fully inserted following the scram. All safety-related equipment including Emergency Diesel Generators are operable. Offsite power is stable and available. RPV water level is currently being maintained at approximately 35 inches with feedwater supplied by the condensate pumps. The cause of the degrading main condenser vacuum is unknown and under investigation. The RWCU Heat Exchanger is in service to remove decay heat.Feedwater
Emergency Diesel Generator
Primary Containment Isolation System
Main Condenser
Control Rod
ENS 4237526 February 2006 08:50:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor Scram Due to Msr High LevelThis report is being made pursuant to 10CFR50.72 (b) (2) (iv) (B) actuation of RPS when the reactor is critical (4 hour report) and 10CFR50.72 (b) (3) (iv) (A) actuation of PCIS group 2 (8 hour report). At 0250 on 2/26/06, Central Standard Time, Cooper Nuclear Station was manually scrammed due to main turbine reheat valve remaining closed following testing concurrent with a high level in the moisture separator. Alarm card procedure for this condition required removing the turbine from service. Subsequent to the scram, reactor vessel level lowered to minus 20 inches wide range indication. This corresponds to approximately 140 inches above the top of the fuel. A primary containment isolation system (PCIS) group 2 isolation occurred as expected due to level transient. All automatic actions occurred as expected. The NRC Senior Resident Inspector has been informed of the event. The reactor scram was uncomplicated, all control rods fully inserted, and no relief or safety valves lifted. The electrical lineup is normal, and the decay heat path is to the main condenser through the turbine bypass valves.Primary Containment Isolation System
Main Turbine
Main Condenser
Control Rod
05000298/LER-2006-001
ENS 4259422 May 2006 12:01:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor Scram as a Mitigating Action Due to Lowering Service Air PressureCNS was operating at 100% power at 06:51 CDT on May 22, 2006 when Plant Service Air pressure began lowering due to an unknown cause. Additional Service Air Compressors could not be started in time to recover Service Air pressure. A rapid power reduction was performed and at 07:01 the reactor was manually scrammed as a mitigating action due to lowering Plant Service Air pressure. All control rods fully inserted and a Group 2 Isolation occurred due to low Reactor Vessel level as expected following the manual scram. Minimum Reactor level was -20 inches Wide Range. The reactor is currently shutdown and stable with level maintained at 35 inches in the green band on the Narrow Range Indicators with the Feedwater System. Reactor pressure following the scram was stabilized at approximately 900 psig using the Main Condenser Bypass Valves and is slowly lowering. This report is made in accordance with 10CFR50.72 as a 4 Hour Report due to a valid RPS actuation and as an 8 Hour Report due to a valid Group 2 Isolation actuation. All automatic actions functioned as expected. The plant is being maintained in Hot Shutdown while the cause of the Plant Service Air Pressure lowering is being investigated. The NRC Senior Resident inspector has been informed of the event. The scram was characterized as uncomplicated. The licensee is not in any significant tech spec LCO and all systems functioned as required. It was noted that there are 3 service air compressors available and only one of the compressors was running at the time of the event. The licensee does not yet know the cause of the service air pressure loss or why the backup compressors did not autostart. Instrument air pressure was maintained during the event.Feedwater
Main Condenser
Control Rod
ENS 4337519 May 2007 07:12:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor Trip Due to Control Rod Hcu Valve Bonnet Leak Into Reactor Building

On the evening of 5/10/2007, Cooper began a scheduled down power to accomplish required preventive and corrective maintenance, including replacement of directional control valves on three control rod drive (CRD) hydraulic control units (HCU). HCU 26-27 was hydraulically isolated for maintenance. The plant was in a single recirculation loop configuration to perform corrective maintenance on 'A' Recirculation Motor Generator. A single reactor feed pump was in operation for corrective maintenance to the 'A' Reactor Feed Pump lube oil system. At approximately 0025 CDT on 5/19/2007 reports from the field indicated that a small water leak had developed from the body to bonnet seal of CRD-V-122 for HCU 26-27. The manual isolation valves for the HCU were already closed to isolate the maintenance area. However, due to seat leakage past one or both of the manual isolation valves, the leakage continued and degraded to the point that a visible plume of steam was issuing from the valve. Further, high airborne activity level developed in the vicinity of the HCU bank in the Reactor Building. As a precaution, the Control Room supervisor (CRS) evacuated the Reactor Building at 0125 CDT. At 0200 CDT, the CRS entered the station reactor scram procedure and performed the preparation steps of transferring electrical loads to the startup transformer. At 0212 CDT, the reactor was manually scrammed. All rods inserted normally. A Group 2 containment isolation signal was received on low reactor water level at 3". During the recovery, the remaining reactor feed pump was manually tripped at 50" in accordance with station procedures due to high RPV level conditions.

'B' RFP was restarted when conditions permitted and is being used to control RPV level.   RPV pressure is being controlled by the bypass valves rejecting heat to the main condenser.

This report is being submitted pursuant to 50.72 (2)(iv) for a critical scram and specified system actuation for the Group 2 containment isolation. Currently, the leak into the Reactor Building has stopped. Radiological conditions are being assessed and a repair and recovery plan developed. The Senior Resident Inspector has been informed. The scram was characterized as uncomplicated and all systems functioned as required. No personnel contaminations or off-site releases occurred due to the HCU valve leak.

Main Condenser
Control Rod
05000298/LER-2007-004
ENS 444029 August 2008 07:04:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor Scram Due to Failure of Reheat Stop Valve to Open During Turbine Valve TestingWhile performing main turbine reheat stop valve surveillance testing, Reheat Stop Valve 1RV 1A failed to reopen simultaneously with a Moisture Separator C high level alarm. Plant alarm response procedures require a reactor scram in this situation. Operating crew inserted a manual scram at 0204 CDT. Immediately after the scram, RPV level responded as expected and dropped below the Group 2 containment isolation setpoint. All rods inserted fully. RPV level is being controlled with RFP A and the startup valves. RPV pressure is being controlled on the bypass valves. The Group 2 isolation was complete with no anomalies. This report is being submitted pursuant to 50.72(b)(2) for RPS actuation (4 hour report) and 50.72(b)(3) for a valid Group 2 isolation (8 hour report). The scram was characterized as uncomplicated. The lowest reactor vessel water level reached was - 20 inches. No safeties lifted during the transient and all systems functioned as required. The cause of the reheat stop valve failure to reopen is under investigation. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.Main Turbine05000298/LER-2008-001
ENS 454827 November 2009 01:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor Trip Due to an Unisolable Leak on the Turbine High Pressure Fluid SystemOn November 6, 2009, at 1930 CST the reactor was manually scrammed following a manual trip of the Main Turbine due to an un-isolable leak on the Turbine High Pressure Fluid System (TGF). The RO (Reactor Operator) scrammed the reactor when (reactor vessel water) level lowered below 12 inches on the Narrow Range Instruments. All Control Rods fully inserted and a Group 2 Isolation occurred when level reached 3 inches on the Narrow Range Instruments. Reactor level lowered to approximately 22 inches on the Wide Range Instruments and was recovered in a slow and deliberate manner in order to minimize the effect on the cool down rate because of low levels of decay heat in the fuel. The Reactor Feed System was used to initially recover level. At 2043, the plant was in Mode 3 with the inboard MSIVs manually closed and level and pressure being controlled by RCIC. The MSIVs were closed to minimize the cool down rate and RCIC was started manually for level and pressure control. The Main Condenser remained available throughout the evolution and condenser vacuum is currently being maintained by the Mechanical Vacuum Pumps. The Group 2 Isolation was verified with no discrepancies and was reset at approximately 2010. All equipment operated as expected and there were no difficulties encountered during the evolution. The TGF System has been secured and is in the process of being tagged out for repair. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Main Turbine
Main Condenser
Control Rod
05000298/LER-2009-002
ENS 4548911 November 2009 23:43:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System ActuationManual Reactor Scram After a Turbine Hydraulic Fluid LeakOn November 11, 2009, at 1743 CST the reactor was manually scrammed following a manual trip of the main turbine due to an un-isolable leak on the Turbine High Pressure Fluid System (TGF) governor valve 3. Initial power level when the leak was identified was approximately 70%. Power was lowered commencing at 1405 in accordance with shutdown procedures. The reactor operator scrammed the reactor at 17:43 from approximately 15% power when directed by the shutdown procedure to place the reactor in a condition to support repairs to the TGF system. In preparation for the scram, level was raised to the range specified in the shutdown procedure (approximately 46 inches). Following the scram, reactor vessel water level lowered to approximately 15 inches on the narrow range instruments, and was subsequently recovered to normal post scram range (approximately 40 inches) using the reactor feedwater system. All control rods fully inserted. No group isolations occurred since level did not reach the isolation setpoint (3 inches). At 1920, the inboard MSIVs were manually closed to stabilize plant cool down and maintain the plant in mode 3. The main condenser remained available throughout the evolution and condenser vacuum is currently being maintained by the mechanical vacuum pumps. Pressure is being controlled using the steam line drains to the main condenser. All equipment operated as expected and there were no difficulties encountered during the evolution. The TGF System has been secured and is in the process of being tagged out for repair. This event is reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) due to a non planned reactor scram while critical. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. The plant is in its normal shutdown electrical lineup.Feedwater
Main Turbine
Main Condenser
Control Rod
05000298/LER-2009-004
ENS 5226125 September 2016 06:03:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System ActuationActuation of Group 1 Isolation SignalAt 0103 CDT a Group 1 Isolation signal was received on Main Steam Line (MSL) A High Flow while attempting to un-isolate MSL A. During plant cooldown for refueling outage, all inboard MSIV's were closed to minimize steam flow to control cooldown rate. With all inboard MSIV's closed and all outboard MSIV's open, MSL drains in-service, and reactor pressure at approximately 330 psig, an attempt was made to un-isolate MSL A by opening A inboard MSIV. This resulted in a MSL high flow signal on MSL A as the valve was being opened, resulting in a Group I Isolation and closure of all MSIV's and MSL Drain Valves. Pressure was equalized to less than 200 psid across MSIV A prior to attempting to open the valve in accordance with plant procedures. All valves actuated as expected and the cause of the event is under investigation. There are no indications of a leak. The Group I Isolation has been reset. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Main Steam Line
ENS 549761 November 2020 10:34:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System ActuationManual Reactor Trip Due to an Un-Isolable Leak on the Turbine High Pressure Fluid SystemOn November 1, 2020, at 0534 CST the reactor was manually scrammed due to an un-isolable leak on the Turbine High Pressure Fluid System. Initial power level when the leak was identified was 100 percent. Power was lowered commencing at 0525 in accordance with shutdown procedures. The Reactor Operator scrammed the reactor at 0534 from approximately 75 percent power. Following the scram, Reactor vessel water level lowered to approximately -20 inches on the Wide Range Instruments, and was subsequently recovered to normal post scram range (approximately 36 inches) using the Reactor Feedwater system. Group 2 Isolation occurred due to Reactor vessel level reaching the isolation setpoint (3 inches). The plant is stable in MODE 3 and proceeding to cold shutdown. The Main Condenser remained available throughout the evolution and condenser vacuum is currently being maintained by the Mechanical Vacuum Pumps. Pressure is being controlled using the steam line drains to the main condenser. All control rods fully inserted and there were no complications. All systems responded as designed. The Turbine High Pressure Fluid System has been secured. This event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) due to RPS Actuation-Critical and 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A) Valid Specified System Actuation. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Feedwater
Main Condenser
Control Rod
ENS 5617422 October 2022 17:58:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation - ECCS Discharge
ECCS Injection While ShutdownThe following information was provided by the licensee via fax: During Mode 5 Refueling operations, while attempting to establish flow through the Fuel Pool Cooling system filter demineralizers, an air operated valve to a radioactive waste tank failed to close automatically. This caused the Fuel Pool Cooling system to pump water from the Skimmer Surge Tanks (SST) to the radioactive liquid waste system. In response to the loss of inventory from the SSTs, the Control Room operating crew started Core Spray Pump A to restore normal operating level In the SST. This prevented the loss of the Fuel Pool Cooling/Alternate Decay Heat Removal system which was the only in service system meeting the safety function of decay heat removal. Core Spray Pump A was used for Injection for less than 3 minutes. This is reportable as a discharge of ECCS into the RCS in response to an event, but not part of a pre-planned sequence under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A) and actuation of a specified system under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(Iv)(A). The resident inspector has been notified. The following additional information was obtained from the licensee in accordance with Headquarters Operations Officers Report Guidance: Licensee reported approximately 6000-7000 gallons of water was injected into the RCS. The stuck open air operated valve was closed. Proceeding with refueling outage operations.Core Spray
Decay Heat Removal
ENS 5622013 November 2022 04:19:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Automatic Reactor ScramThe following information was provided by the licensee email: On November 12, 2022, at 2319 CST, an actuation of the reactor protection system (RPS) initiated a full scram. The plant was in Mode 2, reactor pressure was 149 pounds. The high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) injection valve, HPCI-MOV-MO19, opened and injected cold water into the reactor vessel while HPCI system testing was in progress. The cause is still under investigation. All control rods inserted. Plant is currently in Mode 3 and stable. All systems operated as designed with no Primary Containment Isolation System group isolations. This event is being reported under two event classifications: 50. 72(b)(2)(iv)(B) -- "Any event or condition that results in actuation of the reactor protection system (RPS) when the reactor is critical except when the actuation results from and is part of a pre-planned sequence during testing or reactor operation. 50. 72(b)(3)(iv)(A) -- "Any event or condition that results in valid actuation of any of the systems listed in paragraph (b)(3)(iv)(B) of this section except when the actuation results from and is part of a pre-planned sequence during testing or reactor operation. The NRC Resident has been informed.High Pressure Coolant Injection
Reactor Protection System
Primary Containment Isolation System
Control Rod
ENS 5627817 December 2022 05:51:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A), System Actuation
Manual Reactor ScramThe following information was provided by the licensee via email: On December 16, 2022 at 2351 CST, with the Unit in Mode 1 at 13 percent power, a manual scram was inserted due to lowering Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) pressure, which occurred following an unexpected opening of Main Turbine Bypass Valve 1. All control rods fully inserted. Following actuation of the manual scram, RPV pressure lowered, resulting in an automatic Primary Containment lsolation (PCIS) Group 1 isolation (expected response). The main steam isolation valves and steam line drain valves all closed. The Group 1 (isolation) has been reset allowing RPV pressure control with steam line drains to the main condenser. All systems responded as designed. The plant is stable in Mode 3. Investigation of the bypass valve opening is ongoing. This event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) RPS Actuation and 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A) Specified System Actuation. There was no impact on health and safety of the public or plant personnel. The NRC Senior Resident Inspector has been notified.Main Steam Isolation Valve
Primary containment
Reactor Pressure Vessel
Main Condenser
Control Rod