|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22335A2802022-11-0404 November 2022 11-4-2022 Email Transmitting Draft Questions Pertaining to Pilgrim ISFSI Exemption Request ML22270A0422022-09-26026 September 2022 Acknowledgement Email for Holtec'S Request for Reporting Exemption with Regards to the Pilgrim ISFSI Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (Docket No. 05000293) ML22154A1622022-05-26026 May 2022 Letter and Email from Save Our Bay/Diane Turco Regarding Irradiated Water Release from Pilgrim ML22007A2602021-12-0606 December 2021 E-mail from P. O'Brien, Holtec, to A. Snyder, NRC, on Pilgrim Effluent Discharge ML21287A6192021-10-14014 October 2021 E-mail from S. Phillips, MEMA, to A. Snyder, NRC, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consultation Response to Amendment Review for Emergency Preparedness ML21266A2512021-09-23023 September 2021 Consultation with Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Amendment Application for Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Levels ML21266A2772021-09-23023 September 2021 HDI Clarification of Exemption Requested from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, Section Iii.E ML21267A0012021-09-23023 September 2021 E-mail from A. Snyder, NRC, to A. Sterdis, Holtec, - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, Section Iii.E Acceptance Review ML21257A3832021-09-15015 September 2021 E-mail from A. Snyder, NRC, to A. Sterdis, Holtec, - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Follow-on Request Re Request for Additional Information 2 Pilgrim - License Amendment Request Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Pl ML21211A5912021-07-22022 July 2021 Consultation Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Technical Specifications ML21211A5162021-07-22022 July 2021 Consultation Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Physical Security Plan ML21200A2352021-07-13013 July 2021 Consultation Request to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Technical Specifications ML21200A1522021-07-13013 July 2021 Consultation Request to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim Isfi Only Physical Security Plan ML21176A1842021-06-25025 June 2021 Email from HDI Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Training ML21180A0582021-06-17017 June 2021 Email from Region I Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Inspection - EA-13-132 ML21097A0402021-04-0606 April 2021 E-Mail Consult with Commonwealth of Mass Re - Amendment Application - Physical Security Plan for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station L-20-092, Email Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station-Exemption from Annual Force-On-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B,2020-12-10010 December 2020 Email Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station-Exemption from Annual Force-On-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, L-20-096, Supplemental Information to Support Physical Security Plan Revision and License Amendment Request to Incorporate Alternate Measures - Holtec Email Dated December 10, 20102020-12-10010 December 2020 Supplemental Information to Support Physical Security Plan Revision and License Amendment Request to Incorporate Alternate Measures - Holtec Email Dated December 10, 2010 ML20328A2982020-11-16016 November 2020 Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts on No Significant Hazard for Pilgrim ISFSI Amendment to Address ISFSI II Dated November 16, 2020 ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20163A6802020-06-11011 June 2020 Confirmation of the Scope of the Requested Regulatory Relief for Pilgrim Security Qualifications ML20280A1912020-04-17017 April 2020 Request for Additional Information- Clarifying Information for Pilgrim ISFSI Physical Security Amendment Application ML20269A3542020-03-0505 March 2020 CFR 26.717 Reports 2019 Transmittal Email ML19336A0302019-11-27027 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Re 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding ML19336A0332019-11-26026 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - E-mail to Petitioner - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)- Issuance of Final Director'S Decision ML19331A1952019-11-21021 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Commonwealth Consultation Response - Amendment Regarding Site Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML19331A1732019-11-12012 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Cyber Security Plan ML19331A1642019-11-0505 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Site Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML19331A1792019-11-0505 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - EA and Fonsi for Pilgrim Emergency Planning Exemption CY-19-007, LTR-19-0441 Henrietta Cosentino, E-mail SECY-19-0078 Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station2019-11-0404 November 2019 LTR-19-0441 Henrietta Cosentino, E-mail SECY-19-0078 Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19275H1962019-09-24024 September 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications (PDTS) ML19239A0372019-08-26026 August 2019 E-mail from Entergy Dated August 26, 2019, Notification of Pilgrim License Transfer ML19239A0262019-08-23023 August 2019 LTR-19-0330 Janet Azarovitz, E-mail a Plea for More Time and Reasonable Discussion Including the Citizens of the Commonwealth in the Sale of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19234A2072019-08-20020 August 2019 LTR-19-0328 Lawrence Delafield, President, Six Ponds Improv Assoc., Plymouth, Ma, Ltr Requests NRC to Postpone Consideration of Transferring the Licenses for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Until the NRC Has Answered Concerns by Pilgrim Watch, Se ML19232A4032019-08-20020 August 2019 LTR-19-0322 Diane Turco, Director, Cape Downwinders, Massachusetts, Letter/E-mail Requests Suspension of the Pilgrim License Transfer from Entergy to Holtec Until the Adjudicatory Hearing Is Held and Raised Contentions Are Resolved ML19308A9942019-08-19019 August 2019 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Confirmatory Order Rescission Supplemental Information ML19226A3912019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - EA and Fonsi for Pilgrim Decommissioning Trust Fund Exemption (Holtec) ML19226A3962019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Conforming Amendment in Support of Pilgrim License Transfer Application ML19226A1212019-08-13013 August 2019 OEDO-15-00479-2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - Status (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML19227A1032019-08-0707 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Draft Wording for Potential Condition of License Transfer Order ML19207B3662019-07-26026 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - RAI Direct and Indirect Transfer of Lic.; Conforming Lic. Amend.; Req. for Exemption 10 CFR 50.82(A)(8)(I)(A) for Holtec Decom. International, Llc ML19176A3452019-06-25025 June 2019 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - Information (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML19154A0652019-06-0303 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - Permanent Cessation of Power Operations ML19154A5242019-06-0303 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - RAI - Pilgrim Post-Decommissioning Technical Specifications (PDTS) License Amendment Request (LAR) ML19161A2122019-05-20020 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Remove Cyber Security Plan Requirements ML19123A0332019-05-0101 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Logbook Entry: 05/01/2019 Endangered Species Report Regarding a Confirmed Sighting of North Atlantic Right Whale(S) (Balaena Glacialis) ML19122A4912019-04-29029 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Logbook Entry: 04/29/2019 Regarding the Confirmed Sighting of Ten North Atlantic Right Whales (Balaena Glacialis) ML19108A2372019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action, Proposed Exemptions from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) - On-Site Property Damage Insurance ML19108A2362019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action, Proposed Exemptions from 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) - Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance 2022-09-26
[Table view] |
Text
f/,Craver, PattiFrom: Balsam, Briana I 0Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:26 AMTo: Egan, Joseph
Subject:
RE: Pilgrim -A few clarification questions Thanks, Joe.After looking back over the questions, I think that if you just transmitted the most recent (2010) entrainment and impingement
- reports, that would be enough, and you wouldn't have to worry about the 2006 reportsspecifically referenced in the SEIS. That might help unload some of the burden of putting those documents together.
BrianaFrom: Egan, Joseph [mallto:ieaan1@entergy.com]
1\\(i ISent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:17 AM ' /To: Balsam, Briana
Subject:
RE: Pilgrim -A few clarification questions Briana,After our conversation this morning I began following up on your request.
Sorry, but it's taking me longer than Iexpected.
I'm still in the process of locating the documents and files you requested.
In addition, I need to ensure what is sent is in the right format and has been approved for transmittal.
Pleasebe patient while I work through this process.
I'll be in touch as soon as possible.
Thanks,JoeJ.W. EGAN 508.830.8915 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST CHEMISTRY DEPT.ENTERGY NUCLEAR-PILGRIM STATIONFrom: Balsam, Briana [1]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:32 AMTo: Egan, Joseph
Subject:
FW: Pilgrim -A few clarification questions Joe,Thanks for talking to me this morning and being willing to track down the impingement and entrainment studiesfor me.I attached the questions that we got from Julie Crocker of NMFS. I have been able to answer about half withoutadditional references, but questions 2 and 5 (the first 5-Julie numbered the questions incorrectly)
I need moreinformation about the thermal plume. The last three questions 5, 6, and 7 are about cancer crabs, atlanticherring, and sand lance, and I think I can pull answers to from the impingement and entrainment reports.1 f313' Thanks for your help on this. If you know of any additional studies or documents that would provide information related to these questions, that would be helpful, too.BrianaBriana A. BalsamBiologist Division of License RenewalOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1042 briana.balsam cnrc.gov2
.a ICraver, PattiFrom: Julie Crocker [julie.crocker@noaa.gov]
\0COSent: Monday, April 09, 2012 3:51 PMTo: Balsam, Briana; Logan, Dennis
Subject:
Pilgrim -A few clarification questions Hi Briana and Dennis -As we continue to work on the Pilgrim consultation, several questions have come up that I am hoping you cananswer or help point me to sources of this information.
If it is easier to talk through this over the phone, let meknow. I am around tomorrow afternoon and most of the day Wednesday.
Most of these questions seek toclarify our understanding of information you have provided to date.1. Are there any in-water acoustic impacts of the Pilgrim facility?
Have any in-water measurements ofunderwater noise been taken here or at similar plants? The EIS states that "noise has not been found to be aproblem at operating plants and is not expected to be a problem at any plant during the license renewal term.The staff has not identified any new and significant information during its independent review of the PNPS ER,the site visit, the scoping process, evaluation of other available information, or consideration of publiccomments.
Therefore, the staff concludes that there would be no impacts of noise during the license renewalterm beyond those discussed in the GEIS." This statement makes it unclear whether there is underwater noiseassociated with Pilgrim, but it would not rise to the level of being a concern, or whether there is not actually anyunderwater noise associated with operations.
Could you clarify?2. The dimensions of the thermal plume appear to be described in terms of delta T. Is the 1C delta T the extentchange that is detectable?
We are trying to use the size of the thermal plume as part of the description of theaction area.3. Section 4.1.3 discusses the 1974 thermal plume study that characterized the surface plume. It states, "Forexample, water with a delta T of 3C (37.4F) covered approximately 216 acres (ac) in August when theambient temperature was 17.OC (62.6F),
but only 14 ac in November when the ambient temperature was 8.5C(47.3F)."
The first part of that sentence is confusing, do you mean that the 216 acre area had water that was 3Cgreater than ambient or 37.4F greater than ambient or something else?? Also, can you provide the description of the size of the area that had a delta T of IC at the surface (later text in the EIS describes that area for thebottom)?4. 1 also have a question about this statement
-- "At the bottom, similar to the surface, the smallesttemperature increment measured (IC or 33.8F) covered the largest area (up to 1.2 ac), and water with highertemperatures relative to ambient covered much smaller areas. For example, the highest delta T measured, 9C(48.2F),
covered less than 0.13 ac of the bottom" (in 4.1.3) Did that heated area (1.2 acres) have temperatures that were IC above ambient or 33.8F above ambient, because those would be two very different scenarios!
- 5. Thermal backwash
-Can you describe the size of the plume? The EIS says it is thin and only lasts a fewhours but can you describe how far from the discharge canal it extends and its temperature profile (e.g., the sizeof area with delta T of 3C, IC etc.)3. Have there been any jellyfish (leatherback turtle prey) impinged or entrained at Pilgrim?
I do not see anylisted on table 4-3 on the EIS but it is not clear to me if that table includes invertebrates.
Is there a list of theinvertebrates that have been impinged or entrained?
If it is in the EIS I am having trouble finding it.1
- 4. Zooplankton
-- As you know, right whales feed on copepods (mostly Calanus spp.). The EIS states,"Entrainment of phytoplankton and zooplankton has not been found to be a problemat operating nuclear power plants and is not expected to be a problem during the license renewal term." Doesthis mean that no zooplankton is entrained at Pilgrim?
And if it is entrained, are there estimates of the annualloss? Also, the EIS refers to studies to characterize the zooplankton in the area conducted in the 1970s(2.2.5.3.3).
Have there been similar studies carried out since Pilgrim became operational?
Could you clarifywhat evidence was reviewed to make this determination....
"However, based upon the review conducted by theNRC staff, there is no evidence that the operation of the PNPS cooling system has had an impact onphytoplankton or zooplankton communities, or any resultant effects on the aquatic food web, in Cape Cod Bay."(from 4.8.1 Cumulative Impacts)5. Crabs -The EIS states that cancer crabs (Cancer spp.) were the second most impinged invertebrate.
Can youprovide information on the number of crabs impinged per year?6. Atlantic herring:
The EIS states, "and based on the 2005 Pilgrim monitoring data, the loss to the stock due toentrainment by PNPS appears to be significantly less than 1 percent (Normandeau 2006a)."
Was an actualpercentage provided in Normandeau 2006a?7. sand lance -Has there been an assessment of the effects of removal of sand lance like there is for some of theother fish species (i.e., less than 1% of the population or similar types of conclusions?).
Thank you!JulieJulie CrockerProtected Resources DivisionNortheast Regional OfficeNational Marine Fisheries Service55 Great Republic DriveGloucester, MA 019302