|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24029A2902024-01-29029 January 2024 Comment (3) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1542024-01-25025 January 2024 Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1402024-01-24024 January 2024 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML22228A1642022-08-15015 August 2022 Comment (5) of Cindy Marie Absey, Neil Havlik & Kim Murry on Behalf of League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activ ML22203A0462022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (3) of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc., on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22203A0452022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (2) of Jane Swanson on Behalf of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22202A4242022-07-19019 July 2022 Comment (1) of Anonymous on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML15275A2152015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (40) of Bruce Campbell on Helium Finding Adds New Wrinkle to Newport-Inglewood Fault ML15275A2132015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (38) of Mary Ivora on Environmental Benefits of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2292015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (31) Regarding Civilian Nuclear Power ML15275A2282015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (30) of Unknown Individual Opposing Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 ML15275A2302015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (32) of Joe Ivora Supporting the Relicensing of Diablo Canyon ML15275A2342015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (36) of Elizabeth Brousse on Behalf of Mothers for Peace on the License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2312015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (33) of Debby Nicklas, on Behalf of French Hospital Medical Center, Supporting the License Renewal and Ongoing Operations of PG&E ML15282A3002015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (45) of Allen Myers Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15289A3742015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (84) of Gene Nelson of Californians for Green Nuclear Power Supporting Renewal of the License Application for Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15292A5462015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (103) of Becky Ota and Craig Shuman, on Behalf of California Department of Fish and Wildlife, on Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant License Renewal ML15287A4362015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (71) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact ML15282A2982015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (43) of Minea Herwitz Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15258A3472015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (29) of Craig Shuman on Behalf of the State of CA - Natural Resources Agency, Regarding Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML15282A3042015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (49) of David Traub Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15282A3032015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (48) of Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15292A5452015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (102) of Bruce Campbell on Deis in Regards to Diablo Canyon Facility License Extension ML15292A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (92) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2352015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (91) of Alexander Cannara on Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2372015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (93) of Bob Greene on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2382015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (88) of Meagan Wilson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (89) of Mike Kirkwood on Behalf of Economic Alliance of Northern Santa Barbara County on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (90) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A3392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (94) of Sarah Risley, Heather Tarango, Shilo Terek, Megan Wilson, and Kristin Zaitz Supporting Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (95) of Madeline Cimone on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3412015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (96) of Daryl Gale Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3892015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (97) of Anthony Allen Bisset Opposing on the Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3902015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (98) of Joseph Ivora on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15258A3452015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (28) of Ann Mcpherson, on Behalf of Us EPA, on Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Operating License Renewal for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, California ML15292A3912015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (99) of Nina Beety, on Behalf of Smart Meter Harm, Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3922015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (100) of Margaret Smith on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A5442015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (101) of Antoinette Stein on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A4052015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (82) of Anthony Armini on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4032015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (81) of William P Gloege on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3132015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (83) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3142015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (85) of Lmh Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3152015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (86) from Anonymous Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3162015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (87) of Steve Mcgrath Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3982015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (76) William P. Gloege of Supporting Re-Licensing of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15289A4022015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (80) of Jerry Brown on Behalf of World Business Academy on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4012015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (79) of Kirk Gothier on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4002015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (78) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3992015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (77) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal ML15289A3972015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (75) of Jane Swanson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal 2024-01-29
[Table view] |
Text
9/1/20159/1/015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0090.html As of: 9/1/15 5:13 PMReceived:
Aiimiit 31 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kva-20bi Comments Due: August 31, 201Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental ImpactStatement
[5Document:
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0090 Comment on FR Doc #2015-15921
{)Name: Daryl GaleAddress:PO Box 24387Los Angeles, CA, 90024Email: turtleperson@earthlink.net
[bmitter Information
-u<Li%.,rt[, .¢,qC ....-HrF,'2"General CommentFrom:Daryl GaleLos Angeles, CATo: The NRC EIS Team,Let us be proactive and not reactive (like TEPCO and the Japanese Government regarding theFukushima disaster)
!It will be so much less painful, less expensive, less stressful to the local population and theworkers .... to not relicense Diablo Canyon now!It is far better to deal with the economic/labor issues and the nuclear waste repository issues in thepresent, from a position of strength and consideration than in the aftermath of an earthquake,
- tsunami, sea level rise accident or fire/mechanical release which will involve compounded
- injuries, possible deaths, radiation leaks, transportation nightmares and hysteria and other unforeseen results.We are currently going through a major energy transition
.... As we segue away from fossil fueluse, it is true that we will still need to use some natural gas as a bridge fuel and at night. Batteryfile:lllC
- /U sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0090.html 9/1/2015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0090.html technology continuously keeps improving and we can stem the worst effects of climate change, ifwe band together and recognize the necessity of acting on mitigating it. (I live in a solar apartment and drive an electric scooter)People in general prefer the status quo and are not interested in the stress of making major personsacrifices or behavioral changes unless they are mandated or incentivized through the media, thegovernment, patriotism or financial gain!It is up to our federal and state governments to lead the way so we do not fall victim to a major.environmental catastrophe at Diablo Canyon. We watched and still watch in horror themismanagement, cancer rates, continual dumping of radioactive water and the 230,000displaced/evacuated residents of the Fukushima area.Lets not turn the beautiful, tourist destination of San Luis Obispo into a disaster when we have allthe data and recent warning signals from the ongoing tragedy of Fukushima.
It is time for a strategic shift. We need to find a way and a place to move the nuclear waste fromDiablo Canyon and San Onofre off the beaches, away from a high density population area and asfar away as possible from the excessive amount of earthquake faults that characterize most ofCalifornia.
We need seriously focus and do research on the nuclear spent waste issue: the securement, thetransportation and a permanent repository for it!Thank you for listening to our testimony on August 5, 2015 and considering the viewpoints ofcitizens who live, work, recreate and deeply care about the safety and future of California.
Daryl Galeturtleperson@earthlink.
netfi e:lllC :/U sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N R C- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0090. html 212/2 9/1/20159/1/015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0090.html As of: 9/1/15 5:13 PMReceived:
Aiimiit 31 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kva-20bi Comments Due: August 31, 201Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental ImpactStatement
[5Document:
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0090 Comment on FR Doc #2015-15921
{)Name: Daryl GaleAddress:PO Box 24387Los Angeles, CA, 90024Email: turtleperson@earthlink.net
[bmitter Information
-u<Li%.,rt[, .¢,qC ....-HrF,'2"General CommentFrom:Daryl GaleLos Angeles, CATo: The NRC EIS Team,Let us be proactive and not reactive (like TEPCO and the Japanese Government regarding theFukushima disaster)
!It will be so much less painful, less expensive, less stressful to the local population and theworkers .... to not relicense Diablo Canyon now!It is far better to deal with the economic/labor issues and the nuclear waste repository issues in thepresent, from a position of strength and consideration than in the aftermath of an earthquake,
- tsunami, sea level rise accident or fire/mechanical release which will involve compounded
- injuries, possible deaths, radiation leaks, transportation nightmares and hysteria and other unforeseen results.We are currently going through a major energy transition
.... As we segue away from fossil fueluse, it is true that we will still need to use some natural gas as a bridge fuel and at night. Batteryfile:lllC
- /U sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0090.html 9/1/2015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0090.html technology continuously keeps improving and we can stem the worst effects of climate change, ifwe band together and recognize the necessity of acting on mitigating it. (I live in a solar apartment and drive an electric scooter)People in general prefer the status quo and are not interested in the stress of making major personsacrifices or behavioral changes unless they are mandated or incentivized through the media, thegovernment, patriotism or financial gain!It is up to our federal and state governments to lead the way so we do not fall victim to a major.environmental catastrophe at Diablo Canyon. We watched and still watch in horror themismanagement, cancer rates, continual dumping of radioactive water and the 230,000displaced/evacuated residents of the Fukushima area.Lets not turn the beautiful, tourist destination of San Luis Obispo into a disaster when we have allthe data and recent warning signals from the ongoing tragedy of Fukushima.
It is time for a strategic shift. We need to find a way and a place to move the nuclear waste fromDiablo Canyon and San Onofre off the beaches, away from a high density population area and asfar away as possible from the excessive amount of earthquake faults that characterize most ofCalifornia.
We need seriously focus and do research on the nuclear spent waste issue: the securement, thetransportation and a permanent repository for it!Thank you for listening to our testimony on August 5, 2015 and considering the viewpoints ofcitizens who live, work, recreate and deeply care about the safety and future of California.
Daryl Galeturtleperson@earthlink.
netfi e:lllC :/U sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N R C- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0090. html 212/2