ML14259A166

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:14, 26 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Meeting Slides for the September 17, 2014 Public Meeting to Discuss the Dseis for License Renewal of Sequoyah Units 1 and 2
ML14259A166
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/17/2014
From: Drucker D M
Division of License Renewal
To:
Drucker D M
References
Download: ML14259A166 (17)


Text

Preliminary Results of the License Renewal Environmental Review For Sequoyah Nuclear PlantSeptember 17, 2014 TVA has applied to renew the Sequoyah operating license.The NRC:is reviewing that application.is reviewing the environmental impact of license renewal.has developed some preliminary results of that review.wants your comments on those results.2Meeting Details Meeting Agenda*NRC presentation*Questions & Answers about the presentation materials*Public Comments3 Ground Rules*Speak into a microphone*Identify yourself and your group

  • Minimize background noise
  • Silence personal electronics4 Overview and PurposeNRC presentation NRC's regulatory roleSummary of environmental reviewUpcoming milestones and how to submit comments outside this meetingYour comments5 6NRC's Regulatory OversightNRC regulates commercial use of nuclear materials including nuclear power plantsNRC's mission:Protect public health and safetyPromote common defense and securityProtect the environment 7Environmental ReviewGeneric Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) addresses issues common to all plantsSupplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) addresses site-specific issues for Sequoyah Nuclear Plantlicense renewalReview proposed action (license renewal) and alternatives How Impacts are DefinedNRC-defined impact levels:SMALL-Effects are not detectable or are so minor that they will neither destabilize nor noticeably alter any important attribute of the resource.MODERATE-Effects are sufficient to alter noticeably, but not to destabilize, important attributes of the resource.LARGE-Effects are clearly noticeable and are sufficient to destabilize important attributes of the resource.8 How Impacts are Defined*Special Status Species (EndangedSpecies Act)-no effect-may affect but not likely to adversely affect

-may affect and is likely to adversely affect*Cultural and Historic resources (National Historic Preservation Act)-effects on historic properties*Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898)-disproportionally high and adverse impacts9 Cumulative ImpactsOverall impacts to environment including past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actionsPreliminary findings-SMALL to MODERATE cumulative impacts for surface water resources-MODERATE cumulative impacts for terrestrial resources and global climate change-LARGE cumulative impacts for aquatic resources-SMALL cumulative impacts in all other areas10 Site-Specific Environmental Review of Sequoyah Nuclear PlantResource AreasImpactLand Use & Visual ResourcesSMALLAir Quality & NoiseSMALLGeological EnvironmentSMALLWater ResourcesSMALLTerrestrial ResourcesSMALL Aquatic ResourcesSMALLSpecial Status Species and HabitatsNo effectHistoric and Cultural ResourcesNo adverse effectSocioeconomicsSMALLHuman HealthSMALLEnvironmental JusticeNo disproportionally high and adverse impactsWaste ManagementSMALL11 AlternativesAlternative energy sources analyzed (power replacement)New nuclearNatural-gas combined-cycleSupercritical pulverized coal Combination -Wind and SolarNo action alternative12 Preliminary ConclusionThe NRC's preliminary recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Sequoyah Nuclear Plantare not great enough to deny the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers13 Continued Storage final RuleNRC Continued Storage final Rule addresses management of spent fuel after the renewal term.August 26, 2014 -approval of Continued Storage RuleEnvironmental impacts of continued storage are generically determinedhttp://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage/wcd.html14 Environmental Review Milestones15Application ReceivedNotice of Intent Scoping Public Meeting Scoping Period Ended Scoping Summary Report Draft SEIS Draft SEIS Public Meeting Draft SEIS Comments Due Final SEISJanuary15, 2013March8, 2013April3, 2013May3, 2013April 16,2014July 31, 2014September 17, 2014 September 29, 2014March2015 Additional InformationEnvironmental PM:Safety Review:David DruckerManny Sayoc(800) 368-5642, Ext. 6223(800)-368-5642 Ext. 1924david.drucker@nrc.govemmanuel.sayoc@nrc.govThe draft SEIS can be viewed at:Chattanooga-Hamilton County Library, Northgate BranchChattanooga-Hamilton County Library, Downtown BranchSignal Mountain LibraryNRC's Web site (www.nrc.gov): http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/16 Submitting Comments After the MeetingBy mail:Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB)Division of Administrative Services Mailstop 3WFN-06-44M U.S. NRC, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001In person: 11545 Rockville PikeRockville, MarylandInternet: www.regulations.gov, docket ID: NRC-2013-0037Comments due by September 29, 201417