ML20050C866
| ML20050C866 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 02/20/2020 |
| From: | Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Perry Buckberg Plant Licensing Branch II |
| Buckberg P | |
| References | |
| EPID L-2020-LRM-0010 | |
| Download: ML20050C866 (15) | |
Text
License Amendment Request for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Operation Without Rod Cluster Control Assembly at Core Location H-08 During Cycle 25 Pre-Submittal Meeting February 20, 2020
Introductions
l 2 Kim Hulvey and Gordon Williams - TVA Licensing David Brown - TVA General Manager, Reactor Engineering and Fuels Chris Carey and Kasey Decker - TVA Nuclear Safety Analysis Jim Smith - Westinghouse Licensing Framatome (on the Phone) - Individuals will introduce themselves when answering questions
Objectives l 3 Overview of H-08 and history Impacts of H-08 removal Insights from U1C24 exigent LAR Considerations LAR Content Schedule Answer NRC questions
Rod Cluster Control Assembly Overview l 4 SQN Units originally had 53 Rod Control Cluster Assemblies (RCCAs)
RCCAs are grouped into Banks:
Four Shutdown Banks Four Control banks The H-08 RCCA was part of Control Bank D and located in the center of the core.
History Wear on the grippers for the SQN Unit 1 H-08 RCCA resulted in the RCCA dropping into the core on several occasions Exigent Licensing Amendment Request (LAR) to remove H-08 RCCA for one cycle (U1C24) approved November 21, 2019 The H-08 RCCA and associated drive shaft were removed and replaced with a flow restrictor to maintain upper head flow Control power to stationary and moveable gripper coils for the H-08 RCCA as well as display and alarm functions have been removed l 5
Key Parameters Impacted by H-08 Removal Parameter Bypass Flow Shutdown Margin (SDM)
Most Reactive Stuck Rod Worth Boron Concentration and Worth Trip Reactivity vs Rod Insertion Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC)
Delayed Neutron Data Doppler Temperature Coefficients Fuel Temperatures l 6
The magnitudes of the impacts to the key parameters (small or insignificant) can be seen directly from the information provided in the exigent LAR (LAR dated 11/16/19, SE dated 11/21/19)
The U1C24 core was designed assuming all 53 control rods were present. The LAR demonstrated margin to the safety limits with the H-08 RCCA removed.
The standard reload methodology can be used to design a core without the H-08 RCCA that has margin to all safety limits l 7 Insights from the U1C24 LAR
Trip reactivity decreased due to the removal of the H-08 RCCA, but still above the trip reactivity credited in the safety analysis Required boron concentration for SDM increased by less than 110 ppm The margin to the safety analysis limits generally increased as a result of the removal of the H-08 RCCA -- the improvement is attributed to the power shifting towards the center of the core l 8 Insights from the U1C24 LAR (continued)
Replacement of the control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) is a major effort Personnel dose Long lead activity with first-of-a-kind elements Custom tooling, processes, crew qual. on mockups, etc.
In contrast, removal of the H-08 RCCA can be accommodated in the safety analyses with margin Eliminating the H-08 RCCA from core design is the optimal solution l 9 Considerations
Cycle 25 will be the last Unit 1 core that uses Framatome methods Cycle 26 and beyond will be designed/analyzed using Westinghouse methods (upcoming fuel transition)
Efforts to justify permanent removal of the H-08 RCCA via Framatome methods would have to be repeated using Westinghouse methods TVA intends to request an extension of the H-08 RCCA removal for U1C25 Address permanent removal of the H-08 RCCA via Fuel Transition LAR l 10 Considerations (continued)
Explicit evaluation of the H-08 RCCA removal for U1C25 will not be available until just before the start of the refueling outage (Spring 2021)
Insights from the U1C24 exigent LAR show that removal of the H-08 RCCA can be accommodated in the core design An in-progress U2C24 margin assessment will further demonstrate that removal of the H-08 RCCA can be accommodated The U2C24 margin assessment will be available much earlier than the U1C25 evaluation Provides ~1 year for LAR review l 11 Considerations (continued)
LAR Content Information provided for the U1C24 exigent LAR will be provided for U2C24 LAR will be provided in time for an approximate one year NRC review The U1C24 and U2C24 cores are similar in design to the expected design of the U1C25 core (i.e., similar energy requirements, feed batch size and enrichment)
The U1C25 analysis results will not vary appreciably from the U1C24 and U2C24 results The U1C24 and U2C24 cores demonstrate that a core designed assuming 53 controls rods can still meet all required safety analysis acceptance criteria with the H-08 RCCA removed Designing the U1C25 core with the H-08 RCCA removed assures the U1C25 core design will meet all acceptance criteria.
The U1C24 and U2C24 margin assessments form the technical justification for the Unit 1 H-08 RCCA removal extension l 12
SQN U1 Proposed TS 4.2.2 Markup l 13 LAR Content (continued)
Schedule l 14 Date Milestone April 2020 LAR submittal date March 2021 Requested approval Prior to U1C25 startup Implementation
Closing and Questions l 15