ML19329E979
| ML19329E979 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/22/1974 |
| From: | Mark Miller CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.), ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | Saginaw Intervenor |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006190757 | |
| Download: ML19329E979 (110) | |
Text
p~ 1]1] 5/22/74 M-@ g em' -
g (hU.d 4t g UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
) Construction Permit l CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ) l
) Nos. 81 and 82 I (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)) l RESPONSE TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES OF SAGINAW INTFRVENORS DIRECTED TO CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Consumers Power Company (" Consumers" or "the Company") ,
the licertsee, answers the written interrogatories propounded by the Saginaw Intervenors in accordance with the rulings of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board herein on May 14, 1974, as follows:*
A. A " violation" is deemed to be any citation issued by the Atomic Energy Commission ("AEC") in an inspection report that pertains to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. Some of these citations -
involved matters which the Consumers quality assurance organization identified as deviations from the quality assurance program prior to the issuance of a citation.
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS P00R OUAUTY PAGES
- In its objections to the Saginaw Intervenors! ir errogatories, Consumers indicated that it would answer the interrogatories with respect to construction quality assurance matters at its Palisades facility which took place after the effective date of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50. The Board, in its May 14, 1974 ruling, noted Con-sumers' concession with respect to Palisades, but held that
" Consumers is only required to provide answers. . . to interrog-atories as related to the Midland facility." A similar ruling was made regarding the scope of Bechtel's and the Regulatory Staff's responses to interrogatories propounded by the Saginaw Intervenors.
Hence, these answers are limited to the Midland facility.
8006190 G h t
a t-B. A " suspected violation" or " incident" comprises those deviations from Consumers Quality Assurance program
- which do not quality as " violations".
C. Deviations from Consumers Quality Assurance program are designated as either a non-conformance report ("NCR"), in which case a determination of reportability under 550.55(e) is made, or a Quality Audit Finding ("QAF"), which is deemed to be T?
a non-significant deviation from the quality assurance program, no determination of reportability takes place and corrective action may be underway when the finding is made.
I l
9 e
9 4
. _. . ,y
.. o.
.c ; ,-
f
. INTERROGATORY 1. Identify each document whether internal to your Company or not which relates to or discusses any violation or suspected violation of any Commission regula-tions for each of your facilities. This interrogatory is intended to solicit identification of documents which relate to or discusses an acknowledged violation, an incident which you now (but earlier did not) believe was a violation and an incident which you may have concluded was not a violation, but as to which consideration on that issue was had.
ANSWER: The following is a list of violations which have occurred at the Midland Plant:
VIOLATIONS A. Reported By CPCo. Per 10 CFR 50.55(e)
- 1. Discrepancy Notice No. 42, dated July 14, 1972 (16.4.2).
- 2. Nonconformance Report No. QF-1, dated September 9, 1973 (16.3.4). -
- 3. Nonconformance Report No. 48, dated December 28, 1973 (16.4.1,16.10.2.1).
B. Identified By The AEC (0.4.2.1)
- 1. RO Inspection Report No. 70-2 re March 10-12, 1970 inspection of CPCo. at Jackson, Michigan (" deficiencies noted").
- 2. RO Inspection Report No. 70-6 re September 29 - october 1,1970
. inspection of CPCo. at Midland site (" findings mada").
- 3. RO Inspection Report No. 72-2 re August 28 - September 1, 1972 inspection of B&W at'Barberton and Mt. Vernon (" findings made").
- 4. RO Inspection Report No. 73-8 re september 10, 11 and 27, 1973 inspection of Bechtel at Ann Arbor'(" violations").
5 RO Inspection Report No. 73-10 re Novemben 6-8,15 and 20-21,
- 1973 inspection of CPCo. at Midland site (" deficiencies noted").
y
, s ,
4 The following is a list o 'f suspected violations which have occurred at the Midland Plant:
II. SUSPECTED VIoIATIoI'S A. Nonconformance Reports
- 1. Nonconformance Report No. 1, dated January 22, 1970 (16.3 3).
- 2. Nonconfomance Report No. 2, dated January 25, 1970 (16.2).
- 3. Nonconformance Report No. 3, dated January 25, 1970 (16.2).
- 4. Nonconformance Report No. 4, dated January 29, 1970 (16.2).
5 Nonconformance Report No. 5, dated January 29, 1970 (16.2).
- 6. Nonconfomance Report No. 6, dated January 29, 1970 (16.2).
7 Nonconfomance Report No. 7, dated March 31, 1970 (16.3.3). *
- 8. Nonconfomance Report No. 8, dated May 7, 1970 (16.3.3).
9 Nonconformance Report No. 9, dated May 7, 1970 (16.3.3).
lo. Nonconfomance Report No.10, dated May 7. 1970 (16.3 3).
- 11. Nonconformance Report No. 11, dated June 2, 197o (16.3.3).
- 12. Nonconfor=ance Report No. 12, dated June 2, 1970 (16.3.3).
- 13. Nonconfomance Report No.13, dated June 2, 1970 (16.2).
- 14. Nonconformance Report No. 14, dated June 17, 1970 (16.3 3).
~
15 Nonconformance Report No. 15, dated July 1, 1970 (16.2).
- 16. Nonconformance Report No. 16, dated July 1, 1970 (16.2).
- 17. Nonconfomance Report No.17, dated July 2,1970(16.2).
- 18. Nonconfor=ance Report No. 18, dated July 2, 1970 (16.2).
19 Nonconfomance Report No.19, dated July 2, 1970 (16.2).
- 20. Nonconfor=ance Report No. 20, date'd July 2, 1970 (16.2).
- 21. Nonconformance Report No. 21, dated June 30, 1970 (16.2).
- 22. Nonconformance Report No. 22, dated July 2, 1970 (16.2).
23 Nonconformance Report No. 23, dated July 3, 1970 (16.2).
- 24. Nonconformance Report No. 24, dated July 3, 1970 0 6.2). ,
25 Nonconformance Report No. 25, dated July 2, 1970 (16.2). i
- 26. Nonconformance Report No. 26, dated July 5, 1970 (16.2).
27 Nonconformance Report No. 27, dated July 5, 1970 (16.1).-
- 28. Nonconfomance Report No. 28, dated July 22, 1970 (16.3.2).
29 Nonconformance Report No. 29, dated July 22, 1970 (16.3.3).
- 30. Nonconformance Report No. 30, dated May 17, 1971 (16.3.3). i
- 31. Nonconformance Report No. 31, dated May 19, 0 71 (16.3.3).
- 32. Nonconformance Report No. 32, dated June 8, 1971 (16.3.3).
- 33. Nonconfomance Report No. 33, dated June 8, 1971 (16.3.5).
- 34. Nonconfomance Report No. 34, dated July 6, 1971 (16.3.2).
35 Nonconformance Report No. 35, dated August 2,1971(16.3.3).
- 36. Nonconfomance Report No. 36, dated August 11, 1971 (16.4.3).
'. 37. Nonconfomance Report No. 37, dated september 23, 1971 (16.4.2).
- 38. Nonconfomance Report No. 38, dated october 15, 1971 (16.2).
39 Nonconformance Report No. 39, dated April 18, 1972 (16.4.2).
- 40. Nonconfomance Report No. 40, dated April 18, 1972 (16.4.2).
- 41. Nonconformance Report No. 41, dated April 18, 1972 (16.4.2).
- 42. Nonconfomance Report No. 42, dated July 14, 1972 (16.4.2). !
i l
43 Nonconformance Report No. 43, dated June 6, 1972 (16.4.2).
W. Nonce.nfomance Report No.. W, dated Auguct 28, 1973 (16.4.1)..
- 45. Nonconfomance Report No. 45, dated Decc=ber 17,1973(16.4.1).
- 46. Nonconfort::ance Report No. 46, dated December 28, 1973 (16.4.1). -
'47. Nonconformance Report No. 47, dated Decc=ber 28,1973(16.4.1).
49 Nonconformance Report No. 49, dated December 28, 1973 (16.4.1).
- 50. Nonconformance Report No. 50, dated December 28,1973(16.4.1).
- 51. Nonconfomance Report No. 51, dated December 28, 1973 (16.4.1).
- 52. Nonconfor.ance Report No. 52, dated December 28, 1973 (16.4.1).
. 53 Nonconform nce Report No. 53, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3 1).
- 54. Nonconforn,ance Report No. 54, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3.1).
55 Nonconformance Report No. 55, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3 1).
- 56. Nonconformance Report No. 56, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3.1).
57.- Nonconfor=ance Report No. 57, dated April 1,1974(16.3.1).
- 58. Nonconfomance Report No. 58, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3 3).
59 Nonconfonnance Report No. 59, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3 3).
- 60. Nonconformance Report No. 60, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3.3). "
'61. Nonconfomance Report No. 61, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3).
- 62. Nonconfor=ance Report No. 62, dated April 5, 1974 (16.3.1). '
63 Nonconfor=ance Report No. 63, dated April 5, 1974 (16.3 3).
- 64. Nonconfomance Report No. 64, dated April 26, 1974 (16.2).
B. Quality Assurance Audit Findings
- 1. Nonconfomance Report No. QF-2, dated December 6, 1973 (16.3.4)
- 2. Nonconformance Report No. QF-3, dated January 16,1974(16.3.6) l 3 Nonconfomance Report No. QF-4, dated January 16,1974(163.k) l
- 4. Nonconfomance Report No. QF-5, dated January 25, 1974 (16.3 4) l 5 Nonconfomance Report No. QF-6, dated January 23,1974(16.3.6)
- 6. Nonconfor=ance Report No. QF-7, dated February-6,1974 (16.3 4) 7 Nonconfomance Report No. QF-8, dated February'19,1974 (16.3 6)
- 8. Nonconfor=ance Report No. QF-9, dated February 5, 1974 (16 3 6) 9 Nonconfomance Report No. QF-10, dated March 28, 1974 (16.3 1)
- 10. Nonconfomance Report No. QF-11, dated April 1, 1974 (16.3 6)
- 11. Nonconfomance Report No. QF-12, dated April 1, l'Jt4 (J.6.3 6)
All documents within the scope of this interrogatory as it relates to the Midland Plant are contained within certain files maintained by the Company's Quality Assurance Services Department. The following is an index of these files:
. 4
. l l
t h
A-
^
4
. ~;-
QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ^
MIDLAND PROJECT 0.0 MISCELLANEOUS 0.1 File Index 0.2 Project File Indexes 0.3 Miscellaneous ,
0.4 Licensing - AEC .
0.4.1 Miscellaneous Legal Documents ,
0.4.2 Miscellaneous AEC Inspection Reports 0.4.2.1 AEC Reports 0.4.2.2 (Unlabeled) -
0.4.3 Miscellaneous 0.4.4 Cadwelds ,J. !
0.4.5 Show Cause 1
0.4.6 ALAB 106 Monthly and Quarterly Reports -
1.0 ORGANIZATION 1.1 PQAS Organization and Assignments 1.1.1 Training Records 1.2 Project-Organization 1.3 Bechtel Organization 1.3.1 Engineering i
1.3.2 Procurement i h
1.3.3 Shop-Inspection !
1.3.4 Construction j 1.3.5 Quality Assurance -
) i 1.3.6 Quality Control j i
~ ^ ~ ~
- /;y -
e , - . .
-u
,. _ , ~7-7 -
~ ~
- 1.5' GE (T/G) Organization .
1.6 Pre-Service Inspection Organization ,
~
1.7 Miscellaneous Organizations i 'i; 2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ,
2.1 PQAS Audit Program 2.2 Project QA Program ,
- :2 . 2.1 NUS Evaluation . i c K4 2.3 Bechtel QA Program .
[/ (
2.3.1 Engineering QA Program *~D' 2.3.2 Procurement QA Program 2.3.3 Shop Inspection QA Program _*>
2.3.4 Construction QA Program ,
2.3.5 Quality Assurance QA Program ~
2.3.6 Quality Control QA Program 2.4 B & W (NSS) QA Program 2.5 GE (T/G) QA Program 2.6 Pre-Service Inspection QA Program 2.7 - Miscell.aneous QA Program.
a 2.8- "Q" List *
.2.9 (Unlabeled) .
3.0 DESIGN CONTROL 3.1 Project Design Bases (SAR or Equivalent) 3 . 2- Specification Registers 3.3 ' Drawing Registers 3.4- Equipment Lists 3.5 G-23 Specification . ,
<, , e- we ~s
~ ;j,
~-
~
~
4
^
~4.0 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.1 Requisition Registers- 2:
-4.2 Procjrement Document Registers 4.3 ' Procurement Schedules, Status Reports or Heckl'e Sheets
, , 4.4 Bidders List 5.0 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS ' "' -
e 5.1 Project Procedures ,
t 5.2 Project - Contractor Interface Procedures
- 15 . 3 Bechtel Procedures - Engineering "$ ,.
5.4 Bechtel Procedures - Procurement 5.5 Bechtel Procedures - Shop Inspection
, . <~
~
5.6 Bechtel Procedures - Construction -1
~
Bechtel Procedures - Quality Assurance 2
5.7 5.8 Bechtel Procedures - Quality Control 5.9 B&W (NSS) Field Specs 5.10 GE.(T/G) Field Specs 5.11 (Unlabeled) 6.O DOCUMENT CONTROL 6.1 Document Distribution Schedult
-7. 0 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPILNT AND SERVICES 7.1 Construction Schedule '
7.2 Expediting Reports 7.3 Manufacturer's Fabrication Schedules (CP Co Contracts)
+
-7.4 Documentation Requirements for Receipt Inspection 1 l
l
' "i
{-
c.
8.0- IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS &
COMPONENTS 9.0 CONTROL OF SPECIPL PROCESS . -
10.0 INSPECTION
- 10.1 Shop Inspection Schedules 10.2 PQAS Hold and Witness Points '
-10.3 Project or Engineering Services' Hold and Witness Points a 10.4 Inspection Reports
_s j '.
- .a t 11.0 TEST CONTROL j, 11.1 Preoperational Test Program
+
11.2 Preoperationa Test Procedures a' ,
o .
12.0 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT .
13.0 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 13.1 Shutdown Storage Requirements 13.2 Requalification of Site Stored Material 14.0 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS '
15.O NON-CONFIRMING MATERIALS , PARTS OR COMPONENTS
- 16.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION .
'16.1 'NCR's on PQASD 16.2 NCR's on Consumers Project Organization '
16.3 NCR's on Bechtel , !
16.3.1 NCR's on Bechtel Engineering 16.3.2 NCR's on Bechtel Procurement 16.3.3 NCR's on Bechtel' Shop Inspection ..
'~
L. - ,
', ]
16.3.4 NCR's on Bechtel Construction 16.3.5 NCR's on Bechtel Quality Assurance
,. 16.3.6 - NCR's on Bechtel Quality Control .
16.4.1 NCR's on Lynchburg 16.4.2 NCR's on Barberton '
16.4.3 NCR's on Mt. Vernon '
16.5 NCR's on GE (T/G) 16.6 NCR's on Pre-Service Inspection I' 1
16.7' NCR's on Miscellaneous Vendors 16.8 NCR's on Subvendors 16.9 NCR's by B & W (NSS) 16.10 NCR's by Bechtel -
16.10.1 Deficiency Reports J' 16.10.2 Field Non-conformance Reports 16.10.2.1 .
16.10.3 QADR's 16.10.4 QAF's 16.10.5 MCAR-l's 16.12 Midland - NCR's by AC (AE-Constructor) Contractor Deficiency-16.13 NCR's by Other Contractor's '
~
17.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 17.1 Project Evaluation Meetings and Reports
'17.1.1 Supervisory Site Visits 17.1.2 Directcrs Site Visits
_17.1.3 QA Status Meetings (Vice Presidential) t
- v. . -
f~) ..
17.2 Project _ Meeting +
17.3 Monthly Activity Reports (Field a'nd General Office)
'17.3.1 Field Daily Logs 17.4 QA Program Cost Analysis 1 17.5 Document Retention Requirements _ ,
j l
l 18.0 AUDITS 18.1 Audit Schedule - General office QA ]
- --' ' ~
18.2 Audit Schedule - Field QA '
- .-l 1
18.3 Audit Notirications Procedures ^
a1 Q,
18.4 PQAS Audit Reports 18.4.1 Audit Reports on PQASD -
- i 18.4.2 Audit Reports on the Project ,
% . ~
18.4.3 Audit Reports on Bechtel 18.4.3.1 Audit Reports on Bechtel Engineering i
18.4.3.2 Audit Reports on Bechtel Procurement <
l 18.4.3.3 Audit Reports on Bechtel Shop Inspection 18.4.3.5 Audit Reports on Bechtel Quality Assurance l l
18.4.3.6 Audit Reports on Bechtel Quality Control l 18.4.4 Audit Reports on B &W (NSS) 18.4.4.1 Audit Reports on Lynchburg -
18.4.4.2' Audit Reports on Barberton I 18.4.4.,3 Audit Reports on Mt. Vernon ,
i 18.4.5 Audit Reports on GE (T/G) l 18.4.6 Audit Reports on Pre-Service Inspection 18.4.7 Audit Reports on Other Contractors a
O f r
,.t.
. a. ,,...
~
.;- , i
, -f J. '
s
~
's,4
-l18.5 ' Audit:Re. ports by B & W (NSS) '
l
~ 18.6 Audit Reports by Bechtel i 18.7 Audit Reports by Other Contractors -
i
-18.8 Follow-Up Log - General Office QA '
i 18.9 Follow-Up Log - Field QA , j l
Files based upon the above index are located in
~~
Jackson and at the Midland construction site. On Jhy 9, 1974, _
l Counsel for the Intervenors was notified that copies of all such .,
files had been made and were available for his inspection at the -
- 1 J'l officos of Isham, Lincoln & Beale in Chicago, Illinois. ~Gf[ j
- The persons preparing the answer to this interroghtory .
are as follows: ,' ; '[
Paul W. Koval, Esq. l Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan l Jackson, Michigan 49201
~
R. Rex Renfrow III, Esq.
Michael I. Miller, Esq. *-
.Isham,' Lincoln & Beale One First National Plaza
, Suite 4200 Chicago, Illinois 60670 e
f 9
e L
e L ,
\
I 2 4
. , ~
4
,; 7,
<,g l. .
3- s INTERROGATORY 2. Identify the procedure by which ,
Mr. Youngdahl or any of his subordinates reviews quality ['
assurance matters, including but not linited to meetings and l s
receipt or review of intercompany correspondence. If the pro- ,
cedure now in existence is different from the procedure in ,
existence any time during the year 1973, describe the differences.
ANSWER: Procedure 13 in the Project QA Services Pro- ~,. ,
cedures Manual requires that once every 2 weeks, the Midland .
...;~1 3 i l
- QA Supervisor.or in his absence the Director of QA Services or
('
QA Administrator shall make a visit to the site to assure that Consumers Power site personnel are adhering to and implementing -
established procedures and instruction, and are performing their.' -
job responsibilities. -
n c i.
.In addition, the Director of QA Services or the QA Administrator shall conduct a site visit at least once every two-months for the same purpose.
A. report of the QA Supervisor's visit is sent to the Director of QA Services and the QA Administrator. A report of the, Director of QA Services or QA Administrator's site visit is sent to the above plus the Vice President of Electric Plant
~
Projects.
4 Copies of audits, trip reports, NCR's, stop work orders, evaluation reports, QA Services Procedures Manual, and the QA
. Manual are sent-to the Vice President of Electric Plant Projects.
- ar, .
(- _
_- m ,_
y ,. , ,
f J'-:] -
M,
, + NU J.
.. n
~ '
. Procedure 14 in the Project QA Services Procedures. ;
Manual requires the Director of QA Services or the QA Administra- ~
tor to schedule QA status meetings with the Vice President of u Electric Plant Projects at least once every quarter. Also in ..
~ . .
1 attendance at these meetings are the Project QA Supervisor or 3 '{
the Field QA Engineer, and the Project Manager or his representa-tive. These meetings are conducted to inform all participants of the status of quality related activities of the project in- _
- 3
'cluding those of design, procurement, fabrication, or construction
., ~ .
so that. higher level management can determine the adequacy of the ,[
overall program and any actions necessary to be taken. Procedure .
L 14 also requires that R.C. Youngdahl, Senior Vice President, '
receive copies of the minutes of the quarterly meetings described - .
- ,:D above. In addition, Mr. Youngdahl receives monthly summaries tr-of the activities of design, procurement and construction quality
, assurance activities from the Vice President of. Electric Plant ,
Projects. Finally, Mr. Youngdahl receives informal, oral reports of quality assurance matters as necessary to keep him apprised _
of significant events. -
Prior to 1974, the Midland QA Program Manual Section
, 18.4 required that the QA Services Department keep management
{ informed on QA matters and report findings to the Vice President .s of Electric Plant Projects. Procedure DOC - 1 dated C/28/71 in the QA Audit ~ Manual required that the Director of Project Engineer-Jing Services, the General Director of Plant Project Services
.(position ~no longer in existence) and the Executive Manager of Electric Plant Projects -(now Vice President) be sent reports of
,.i m
- , y; l '. ~.
w a g.,
, : evaluations, audits and non-conformances. The Quality '
(
Assurance Administrator had responsibility to schedule and l
conduct periodic management meetings and such meetings took -
place. See answer to Interrogatory 9. The main difference e
between 1973 and 1974 is that there were no formal procedures written prior to 1974 indicating frequency and types of subjects ~
to be discussed in. status meetings with higher level management. ,
y Thepersonspreparingtheanswer'tothisinterrogatory,'
;;n :-
are as follows: jh
. si. [$':r
, c. 2.
' .'hq i -
Messrs. Gilbert S. Keeley >> Stephen H. Howell '; "a Consumers Power Company - # 1945 Parnall Road E~ Jackson, Michigan 49201 , t
~
- w Michael I. Miller, Esq.
~
(;. Isham,. Lincoln & Beale ~ One First National Plaza ;
-Suite 4200 Chicago, Illinois 60670
- e t
k 9 I i m j A, , ,a )
- . :a ";
' - , . i,
~
~
wS
*W ;a %
.. O,.,
A . . .! Si T gy INTERROGATORY ~4. Have you concluded that Consumers
'ff['
Power' Company.is in compliance with quality assurance regulations _, , , J
.concerning each of its facilities? If you have, please set _
~
forth the regulations with which you assert that Consmaers
. ~ , .s:e Power Company is in compliance and state each fact upcn which [
you base ydHE judgment. j,
.m c
f'l ANSNER: From time to time, including the date on s, . ...p . . o.: which-this answer is prepared, Consumers has concluded that it f[" , -l' is in compliance with . Appendix B ,to 10 CFR Part 50, the only)~ ' ' 6%} ' ,
" ^%
applicable quality assurance regulation. Construction of the 19f
};p Midland facility has been proceeding over a four-year period. [
vy During this time, interpretations by the AEC of the requirements 'j 90 of Appendix B have evolved in an effort to express specifically , the meaning of the general language found in Appendix B. '" (See
~
GAO Report B-164105) In general, these interpretations have im-posed more stringent requirements on the formulation and imple-mentation of the Midland quality assurance plan. These evolving interpretationsofEppendixBareusuallyrevealedtoConsumers as a result of-AEC Directorate of Regulatory Operations Inspections, Exit Interviews, Inspection Reports, AEC letters to Consumers .
- asserting violation,s of Appendix B, decisions of Atomic Safety _
and Licensing Boards, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board and the Commission :itself, in ruling on construction permit or operating. license applications. There have been ocessions ,_ on which Consumers has been notified that specific pertions
- of its Quality Assurance-Program Manual er its implementing '
s d y o ,, ---- , , - - - - - , , , , - _ . - . s ., s + e~
U' 's;
., , , - ;, - ~.
' ?w 17 . "%hgls -;
- procedures were not fully in compliance with Appendix. B.
. (See-answer to Interrogatory 1.) - The AEC has also issued a proposed '
- , .+
rule (39 F.R. 13974) re-interpreting Criterion I of Appendix B. ;
- . n
. , As each of'these evolving interpretations of or f. specific deviations from Appendix B have been made known to Consumers, it has become apparent that the Midland Quality if ..- ~ Assurance Program Manual or its implementation was not at that " _ l .:;
. point in time in compliance with the current interpretat n of I
Appendix B.- Consumers thereafter promptly took action td once'. .on, "I
' op again bring the Midland Manual and its implementation into '
f94
.. m compliance with the current interpretation of Appendix B. See ~?
Gl* answers to Interrogatories 1, 25 and 26 herein.
,,, .s ,
Ar . ,; 4 Changes have also been required by Consumers in the- ~ ~
;r QA Programs of their Contractors where we deemed that such
- changes were necessary through our interpretation of the words in Appendix B or where we deemed that a more viable program was necessary. The changes required by Consumers are documented in the audit findings and non-conformances we have issued and upon reviews, comments, and letters issued to Bechtel and B & W on
~
their QA Programs. Documents describing these events in detail are available for inspection and copying at Consumers' offices in Jackson, Michigan. l i l i
~ . , ,J Yt
- T-
.8
. v.
n s , The persons preparing the answer to this interrogatory are as follows: . 3 9' Messrs. Stephen H. Howell ~ Gilbert S. Keeley
~ '-
Consumers Pc,wer Compan . 1945 Parnall Road > " Jackson, Michigan 49201 2 Michael I. Miller, Esq. .<
'Isham, Lincoln & Beale ,
One First National Plaza- _ Suite 4200 '
.s Chicago, Illinois 60670 -
f.r_ , V .
- .F G ' i E
*t f 4.
4 l I i l k'
~
V
' k{
+
,_.,. - .ufp i ..
- _ _ .x
- 5. y,i
_v 4
.,. - ;t.c.
(.( ) \
, p pi
, l: .
INTERROGATORY 5. Have you ever' concluded that .
' Consumers Power Company is not in compliance with Quality -
i Assurance regulations.in connection with any of its facilities? ; ,.I:., If so,'please set forth each fact upon which you base your
,,t.
. f.
c ., judgment together with each relevant regulation. , ANSWER: See answer to Interrogatory 4. '. I
, 3a :
4 , - .k .
~ '
ni. . ; r,d:.Cl . 1
~.
- 4. w; s L :.
, . -:(ci ijA
+,P&
a' ' ~^
, R
- ~ , , .
, /
p -- i
'T,' l
; ss '
i I rJ: ' . 0 l 4 24 1 l
^
. s e' * * * .
l
=
, .. .n ., .
' ^.-l ~d .c , e ,
*- ^ , , .s ., ; ~
lL3 ,
,4
' ' ~
20- .; j{
-e
~p
. INTERROGATORY 6. Have you concluded that there V/-
~
is reasonable assurance that Consumers Power Company will (; gq be able to comply with quality assurance regulations through , , u, the construction process.in Midland? If you have, please state each fact upon which you base your conclusion. Include within ~ ([ your answer whether you have considered the activities of - Consumers Power Company at any of its other facilities and . . if not, state why not. .
$ ,_' < uq v.
ANSWER: " Reasonable assurance," although .not a terrt . _~~ -a authored by Consumers, is defined for purposes of this answer , $i m.s as the conclusion to be reached by the Atomic Safety and Licensing
/ .
1 Board as to future quality assurance implementation by licensee. , such conclusion should be based on an analysis of Consumers'
. 's. ..
> current Laplementation of its quality assurance plan at its , Midland. facility. The facts on which a conclusion of " reasonable , assurance" are based include: (1) development and dissemination of a management policy-level philosophy indicating a commitment
.to quality assurance; (2) formulation of a comprehensive-quality assurance plan, such plan.to be included in licensee's preliminary safety analysis report and reviewed and updated periodically thereafter in light of management evaluation} AEC inspection reports ,
and consultants' recommendations *; (3) hiring and training of per-I T sonnel qualified in quality assurance activities; (4) auditing on a
- Consumers' quality assurance plan has been approved by the
' Atomic Energy Commission (See ALAB-106) , and compliance of-the plan with AEC regulations is, therefore, outside the scope of this Show-Cause proceeding. '
4 a t v g -y- -+..-,7 ,, , - , ,6 - , , --
., w:'
4"
. c .
periodic basis by licensee of its overall quality assurance
~
program (including contractors' programs), together with a . i mechanism for improving and correcting implementation of the-quality assurance program as a result of audit findings; and (5) informing the Atomic Energy Commission in a timely manner in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR S50.55(e) . In addition, employment of qualified, independent consultants-to periodically review Consumers' Midland quality assurance , program is further evidence of " reasonable assurance" of future
, s' compliance. N } [,
Thus, Consumers h'as concluded that there is "reasondble ~ assurance" that it will coIply with quality assurance regulations throughout the construction of the Mid1 nd facility. This can-clusion is based upon those steps taken which are described in _ _ Consumers Power Company's " Answer to Show Cause" dated December 4, 1973 on pages-39-47, and additional steps taken since that document was written as described below. Consumers has taken the following action: lA. Quality Assurance Documents.
- 1. Quality Assurance Services Procedure Manual.
- a. Revisions and additions have been made to further improve and clarify procedures and to incorporate suggestions from AEC inspections and consultants' reviews.
-b. New procedures specifically provide for (1) l
~
periodic status meetings at the Vice Presidential l _ ~ !
. I i
'^
+ u?
=
- o. ,
level,J and (2) - periodic site visits by Quality Assurance supervisory personnel. C. Procedures have been instituted that provide
]
~
for the necessary qualifications required for Quality Assurance personnel and specifically re- [.. quire certain training to attain and maintain -- proficiency. . /c
-S?
- 2. The Midland Quality Assurance Manual i~s in the %5" 44;
_ process of being completely rewritten to incorporate .
- c .
recommendations made by consultants. 7
/
T
- 3. A new schedule has been developed to tie quality assurance prerequisites to construction progress to i+-
c
;p ensure all necessary quality assurance actions are anticipated and perforned. .
B. Quality Assurance Consultants
- 1. NUS Corporation has completed their review. All their recommendations have been considered and decisions reached on the actions to be taken. As a result of ,
their review and recommendations, we; ,
- a. Completely rewriting our Midland Quality Assurance Manual to conform to their suggested -
form'at and to include most of the suggestions
-made on specific parts of the Manual. .
b r
~
,' ^ -
r ' x m. w
}- ', 4[1}}:;
n-g':. :
=; +
,w ,
-23 '
, 1, i
<$ /
~b. Unifying various Consumers Power Company
.. }E s '
Manuals relating to quality assurance. ,, $I
- c. Having an outside consultant review the ]{'
. techniques and results of audits run by , ._.,
ic ' ' Consumers Power Company personnel.
'y
'd. Reviewing the organization of our start-up
.. /
program. -
~, .
- e. ' Preparing and distributing an overall s Q$w.y, n Consumers Power Company Electric Area Quality .-H
. mypg.g
.u < -
Assurance Policy letter for direction and . Ji
'h;r .i -:,
assignment of responsibilities. Nh. 4 -
,, v. y
, u
- 2. General Electric Company's Apollo Systems Ufu L :;. s.
organization has been retained to: ;
- a. Review the rewritten Midland Quality Assurance Manual. . '
~.
- b. Review the latest Quality Assurance Services Department Procedures Manual and the Midland i
Project Procedures Manual. 4
- c. Review the audits Consumers Power Company has 7.
made to determine the adequacy of the scope and content of the audits and the adequacy of the ' responses. [ _d. .Be available for periodic reviews of the >" Consumers Power Company quality assurance program for updating requirements and for an audit of their implementation. a ,
, , ~[
~ _sa; a
- L.,;
p. C. Coordination with Bechtel. '~
- 1. In follow-up to'Yates' (Bechtel) letter to .
Howell (Consumers) of December 19 (Exhibit M of - '
" Answer to Show Cause") a series of letters des- ,
cribing actions taken to implement the commitments - made therein were exchanged. 12-14-73 H. O. Reinsch to R. D.~ Allen L
" Reporting Important QA/QC Problems" , 9/.
1-3-74 P. R. Cassidy to Staff Meeting Attendees 'f 3 "QA/QC" ~ +4: 4 l-29-74 uG M. M. Krout to G. S. Keeley
~
' # 'J
" Reference Alden Yates Letter of 12-19-73 to S. H. Howell" :" '
/
l-31-74 Alden Yates to S. H. Howell ;k,,
" Site Visit - Midland Project" -
2-8-74 M. M. Krout to S. H. Howell -
" Management Attention" '
u 2-15-74 S. H. Howell to Alden Yates
" Implementation Delays" 2-26-74 Alden Yates to S. H. Howell -
" Answer Response to S. H. Howell's 2-15-74 Letter" 3-21-74 M. M. Krout to S. H. Howell
" Management Attention" '
I f In addition to these commitments, Bechtel is supply-
' ing monthly for Consumers' review a list of persons b
t who have visited the project or participated in project meetings and the function performed as it relates to , , the QA/QC program. - l l l
. . 1 v' j
-1:
y f-R-s: s. , i_ 2.. A meeting was' held on March 12, 1974 between ,
?
Howell and Yates to' discuss certain problems on tdun quality assurance effort at Midland. See outline ireply by M. M. Krout dated March 12, 1974 for meeting .
~
~with S. H. Howell on March 12, 1974 and S. H. Howell ~(.
meeting notes dated April 2, 1974 entitled " Meeting. With Bechtel on Problem Areas." Meetings on this type - and level will be held periodically as needed to resolve [
-< . ,ce ,
questions.and focus attention on problems, l . gg
' @af-it? fjg -
D. Coordination with Babcock & Wilcox, Inc. ("B & W") .. 'O 4
%.. R+
- 1. On August 7 and 8,1973, B & W was directed to D)[[ c.y upgrade its QA plan as it relates to the Midland - _ .,
, g,fL ,
- g, . b '
facility and such activity is underway. e, . 2 Dd
.g;.;c
? ", O
>% % , i This conclusion is not based on other activities of' .
i Consumers Power Company, except insofar as early revisions to - Midland QC procedures we're based on upgrading comparable pro- n-cedures at the Palisades facility. See answer to Interrogatory j
- 26. Consumers' manuals, procedures, organizatica and the ,
^
interpretation of the regulations have been changed to such an extent that prior activities involving construction quality assurance at other. facilities are not pertinent to current or-future implementation of the Midland quality assurance plan. The persons preparing the answers to this interrogatory , m are as follows: n W s' Va
$ q r+-
"' [f Q
_ -4.
'. t, t.; -
, g,;,g .
N '
,l) .J
, ~26-43
, Mr. Stephen H. Howell *
'M !
. Consumers Power Company n 1945 Parnall Road
.. Jackson, Michigan - 49201 .; . .. ,
Michael I.-Miller, Esq. ' - Isham, Lincoln & Beale - & One First National Plaza #> - l Suite.4200 rm l
~
Chicago,' Illinois 60670 -
' l
~ r
- i; 4
,p,;\9 Y' '-
b
- e. s r. , L &
~
4 l
<> .x ,] ^- Q.g _;
; '% ' O -qp;r.J
^^ - % ,_ , a hy {
._ y '; - - ,
...w .
,A[,
,',r. ')
= , ~ ~
..A ; .<r
' ' _g,~ .;' ' +/ .
u < , ,; , _L , . O,T% - n' fas
. ; e A
- . ~
'1 6/ . .
. .u. :, g ,
_ 4-'; M
+ ,
e k
**: ; v ,
4
.:4:
s P f a f. 4
- 4
/
'I
*c ,
, -D b k .% fh *
' ,i k' y -
?%'i ._
, . ':.':N! ,
, ..- d ~#; , ,
e , , .> - e .
,1 '
INTERROGATORY 7. Have you ever concluded that ,.1 , ,
, 2-there is no reasonabic assurance that Consumers Power Company ,
f Will comply with quality assurance regulations during the con-
~ ^
structio,n of the Midland facility? If so, please set forth each , fact upon which you base your answer. In connection with your , answer, state whether you have ever considered in connection ' with your conclusion.any activities of Consumers Power Company
;;- ~ ..,
at any other racility and if not, state why not.
,; d$. y .
.y; ,, 2, ANSWER; No. See answers to Interrogatories 4 and 6.. W-
.3,_.7 6
; 1,;;
r-X .
.D '
, , . 4
,19 'T
;-g -
sp , a g'- Y' '
.- i e
/ ~
, 1-F vi 1
3 V 5 8 g., ; s I a e h r i_ ( __ , , _ t:r- :
? Q :;
s;
- ' ?' %j.
+ 2
~
' INTERROGATORY 8. In your judgment, which of the fol- '_,
, ~
lowing'is responsible for assuring reasonable assurance with 7
. , c, Q.A.-Q.C. regulations at the Midland plant' facility: -
(a) Consumers Power Company; s
/
. N:
(b) Certain named individuals at consumers ? Power Company; * [J ~- 3 (c) Bechtel Corporation; ,;; ~c .
=_ ,
i (d) Certain named individuals at Bechtel N. . Corporation; ; . 4 g,l (e) Atomic Energy Commission or any part thereof; Y' '"[.. and- 'M '
- .;;7 , e :.
(f) Certain named individuals at the Atomic Energy Commission or any part thereof. W
, _ < y '.;
, Please explain your answer in detail. ZM M-
- -,;:d..i* ~f ANSWER: ANSI N45.2.10 provides definitions which are au pertinent to the answer to this interr'ogatory. 'M . .., .
Audit is "An activity to determine through investiga-tion, the adequacy of, and, adherence to, established procedures, ~ instructions, specifications, codes, and standards, or other ap-plicable'contractural.and licensing requirements, and the ef- s fectiveness of implementation." , Inspection is "A phase of Quality Control which by i
~
means of examination, observation, or measurement determines the conformance of' materials,. supplies, components, parts, appur- - - tenances, systems, processes or structures to predetermined l jguality requirements." ( o l-l- -
^
- j. y
- %~
,, . li-i
., , yv'
.N;
, .. . ( (, y
. y ,
O,)_ Quality Assura!.ce (QA) is "All those planned and .;._ , systematic actions necessary to ' provide adequate confidence that " an item or a facility will perform satisfactorily in service." '$i Quality control (QC) is, "Those QA actions which pro- E o
'4,
' ride a means to control and measur'e characteristics of an item', "5 process, or facility to established requirements." \;
,s Surveillance is "A review, observation, or inspection 1,..
=.
~
for the purpose of verifying that an action has been accomplished
,.+
as specified at the location of material procurement or manu- ,J,g., .. .; facture." , g.$
- w.m ~
All of the groups mentioned in (a) through (e) of .3 1 yS: the interrogatory have various' responsibilities for assuring , "(] 77, :..g . reasonable assurance with QA/QC regulations. .c: ,. nc Consumers Power Company had delegated certain ac- ~
...,m..
- } -g tivities to Bechtel and B&W.
At the completion of a work ac-y., tivity such as engineering design or a construction activity by ' Bechtel or B & W the CC activities on design are performed by Bechtel or B & W Engineers, respectively. Bechtel Quality Control , Engineers perform QC activities for construction. Bechtel Procurement l Inspection Department Inspectors conduct surveillance arid audits of , Bechtel suppliers with like inspcetions performed by B & W Inspectors on B & W procured items with added surveillance by Bechtel Inspectors. ! As an in'tegral part of Bechtel's quality function, Bechtel QA Engineers from Ann Arbor, San Francisco, and the site conduct periodic audits ' of Bechtel's. design, procurement and construction activitics. Similarly, B & W QA Engineers conduct periodic audits of' B & W design,
~
~
procurement and fabrication activities. ' 7:a
. 4 h
_ a..
4: , . ,c ,
+1, g, sp -
J 97 -w, Consumers Power. Engineering Services and Project ,
~
personnel conduct reviews of vari'ous design activities performed
~ '
by.Bechtel and B&W. The QA Services Department is responsible n:. ;c for audits of design activities and for surveillance and audit - 1
. O :f
- of all procurement and' construction activities. This is c
'J - '
. :T
, accomplished by conducting audits of the design.to assure that 447 ,
-1 design review procedures are being followed and, in some cases, by 3 y *y . ,
using Engineering Services personnel to check design calculations. 1", 7 , ., Procurement inspection and construction activities are surveilled ' $
- s .n
.f. h and. audited by'QA Services personnel by conducting surveillance ' ] $3 '
- x z sa and audits at suppliers' shops during fabrication with assis-
+ A97( ,,.
j tance from Engineering Services personnel in some cases, and by' 'd(j c. surveilling' construction and QC activities at'the site. - s!].:CG!
?$b'!%
The Regulatory branch of the AEC is responsible for 4 reviewing the Applicant's and its Contractors' QA Program Plans "" $ < for adequacy. The Division of Regulatory Operations is f x. responsible for monitoring activities-to assure that the Ap- .. , q
- plicant and its Contractors are implementing the activities f~
G' specified in the QA Program Plans. , i The fi'nal responsibility for assuring that QA regula- , tions are being met rests with Consumers Power Corporate Manage- - i ment, with the.QA Services Department, including all personnel $x2 ! _. .. m -
;, within.this department, having.the prime responsibility. The attached . , ,
s ' ' 9
. chart identifies Consumers personnel having within the QA Services Department who ha~ve. this responsibility. "
.There are many personnel within the Bechtel Corporation-c responsible for assuring reasonable assurance with QA regulations .
e " 'J',
& s %c ';
~ -
- . +: y.
; b
.* , ~ M. , - [..j
'*^s
' 1 -
1 ;' .b* * (j
o jg _ ** 4 o , , , a >+
, ' C' "+j ,
- i. *;~
' including the Bechtel Project Engineering, Procurement Inspection Department, Quality Control and Ann Arbor QA l group, and San Francisco QA Management. ,[',
The persons preparing the answers to this interroga- ; ,' tory are as follows: J i Mr.' Gilbert S. Keeley ; ~ Consumers Power Company - -
~ " ' '
1945 Parnall Road
. Jackson, Michigan 49201 *
";[ }f
; - , .3 R.~ Rex Renfrow III, Esq. WV Michael I. Miller, Esq. 'd '
Isham, Lincoln & Beale - One First National Plaza - ,, 3
'i Suite 4200 -
Chicago, Illin'ois 60670 -
#- . F la a
[ x v ,;_5 O
+k e
a O
+
4
+-
'*w4 Y ,m &-'nh
. . , . - , y
> c
-5 4a ^-r.
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES ' .- l > BASIC PROJECT ORGANIZATIONS , 4 Vice President of Electric '
, ?: '
Plant Projects '
- 9. H.;Howell ,
Dir of Proj ;,./' QA Servicas G. S. Kee g s i < -- 4 QA ig f Administrator -4 L ^ r./ C. O. Hills ^ C'
- F.q']f fAJ{"(.
Midland Project QA QAE QAE QAE s Supvr - GO Metallurgy Mechanical Elec & I&C H. W, Slaaer M. E. D' Haem T. W. Bowes G. W. Ford
.Sf,.
2 Midland '
. c.
Project Field ,y .[. QA Engr .pl J. L. Corle3_ ,
. s,.
Midland Midland Field QA Field QA Coordinator' Coordinator Civil L Civil R. E. Whitaker D. E. Horn Midland Field QA Coordinator Mechanical '
.D. R. Keating Midland j Field QA
- . Coordinator -
Elec. I&C
,No Incumbent-k 4
~
, .~.<
' N ':: ',
. - j.4
~
' ' : % y ,..
dO -y3
;i ,
n -
' INTERROGATORY 9. Identify in connection with each ,
of Consumers Power Company facilities as set forth in the definitional section each document ever received or reviewed, , each meeting you have had (include dates and names of attendees) _ > and-each physical structure you have reviewed in connection ? .~ . .
~ with your analysis of, first, compliance with quality assurance regulatione and, second, reasonable assurance of continuation ,a with compliance with quality assurance' regulations. ,
y
, ,, t
.c The.only meetings of which Consumers has Y ANSWER: &,.
4.y knowledge are described in documents which were prepared con-
, .+
.. W --
temporaneously with the meetings. Such documents are available s:
.3 '[. .
w~" for inspection and copying by the Saginaw Intervenors at Consumers
; . c.y corporate headquarters in Jackson, Michigan. Documents reviewed u
~.a. '^
by Consumers in connection with its analysis of compliance with . .
. :w quality assurance regulation and reasonable assurance of continua ,
tion of compliance with quality assurance regulations are described'. in answer to interrogatories 1, 6, 22, 25 and 26 and in the - attached index of Consumers files relating to the Midland project f (attached as Exhibit 1). , The systems, components, and structures of the Midland Plant which come under the QA requirements of Appendix B are listed.in a "Q-List." - The initial definition of a 0-list (from Amendment 6 to the PSAR) , was : "The Q-list consists of critical structures, ' systems, and components which require additional design control 4 -N m g _Q
~ /-~ \ S
'?
L ol measures; This list is updated from time to time and is
- ze reviewed and approved by CPCo engineering personnel and QA at e
Services in the same manner as other documents." 7f The Midland QA Manual has included the following , definition of Q-list: "The QA Program has been established ;, to provide confidence in the satisfactory in-service performance of 'those structures, systems and components (Q-listed) , which would prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated M. > accidents which could cause undue risk to the health and safety
%;v of employees and the public." _' {
Revision 3 of the' Q-list is attached as Exhibit 2. ;
'u CPCo conducts audits and surveillance of equipment, materials, and services which they have contracted for oither i
directly or through B & W and Bechtel. This includes surveillance l and audits of suppliers', facilities and at the site of work and i 1 inspection activities. The persons preparing the answer to this interrogatory are as follows: Mr. Gilbert S. Keeley Consumers Power Company 1945 Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 _ Paul W. Koval, Esq. I Consumers Power Company l 212 West Michigan Jackson,-Michigan 49201
- s. -,.
p I
~
-L
# 4 % a ' 4
#' $ . e'tf." /,.,,
.O g
' * , wj I
,' y Q~:? ?j O l? '
~< '
, e.
, g;
- s, ,
. n;. . , . 3. :;
..r.
s,.. i e 1
. * - y. .,
3
^ ' ' '
34 - ..
- - s;4.9..
v5 :
.,%;g,.
. ., m.; ,
R. Rex Renfrow III, Esq. - v ce;. ,
-Michael'.I. Millor, Esq.
-Isham, Lincoln &'Beale " '
%.n One First National Plaza .> - -
J> + Suite 4200 '
.+:c '.
W,. . Chicago, Illinois 60670 ' / - I Ay$ ,
\ .$E 44 *
^$f" '
?
au ,
..-+,
4 \ .. '" Ye
,- U ;p t
^ -a ,
u .) * 'g , ,,
.+ -
4
< -D 'h W
- x. - .
,y
- "s'[
- g. 'p'g'^
. e O,
.c . . .. ;y I
l h9
, r e
$ (- *c- b.s kyp:,.p.. 7(.,g J' >
~
n,.f W?$)f tf
. - sw.
I
$k'- [,. 84 a
J. y-
- - ,..s..
q c.. . J5% ',pr.'
.g+ * '
', {.k b i
6 9.Q; e.,% -ll v 1
,# - s.,
"-} e _, . ' . '
.'w ,e,.
9- h a 4
, .. a ~.
* % g
. . M.
+ [ 0 s,f7.M .
y.- .. g O '.6" P 7 %,
- 5. s "
'[ ha./) --t$
4 Y v .- O
/ ,
' , f l. ' 'J, b l
- s i
. ~ ,
. . +
-e.-
. 4 t_
"6 :
) i-b
+
s e 1. w-Y 4 _ 9 , 1 o
')
e ,,.. 6 ' s > 4 I
., [ .
^
l
. l
, i e
f* * " . s'y ' -
$ ,% A
^ "
Mha i.O' v'g*.X,;[ ',; .
~
, + L3.."
.n.
+ l .
'q3" <
, _ . g..
+
g,n- {= _-g.yj .
> -\
.g
,99,.3 -- .
+ -
+ { f-y :,s- .
g..
- - .4 . .,
- 4. I .
.=,o.
- 4 r . s. 2 - -
_ _%'s y m, a y>p s, e
]t.35
.b.
- M 4
. t f
k ^ e 1
?
~fp N 4
;[::
1,
- r
- an E4
- .+t
.e:9
'W.
v. EXHIBIT 1 hi,b i*
;?n.u .
.p ... e
), J
> . ,;.y - , .
.aw.g, A. . , '. .. , ^ ,*. ..
~n FILES OF A. H. An'OND 4.. e-
,1;A'@ s
. ..t
' (President and Chairman of the Board) .
a; ,i"; @b, ,
..n > yegy; A-1 Midland Plant Folder I+
~ / W *. a[.. > .
2 . , . - - .;.f , . Midland Plant,e- Folder 3 - W td 3 m.? statistics - Miscellaneous . G
~
HQ + E 4u.Y4{
,s i. .
B.
- ,~ ,v cs,#,.
,y FILES OF J. A. McDIVITT ' "-'
(Senior Vice President) . f' B-1 Monthly Recumes 9 2 Midland ~ , l y. a E 1 l
. l 3
r -
-, g '
l
. ~
6
.s
~
e 5.- y
- l i
n
~ . ~ s 4 -
k b l ,_ e r
" ~ '
- .r
. , u
~
i1 -::;( N. I. . m .-' ) l s, ;. .y _. 3- . ; I
-. +0 e, cq
, _. v ,
. -2' ,
2 C. - ' FILES OF S. H.'HO'.GLL ,
-(Vice Presidenti) --
ELECTRIC PIE"I' PROJECTS DEPARTME:.'T , C-1 Midland AEC Inspection Reports - 1974 f' 2 . Midland'AEC Inspection Reports - 1973 -
,'[
a. 3 Midland AEC Inspection Repcrts - 1972 ~{ 4 Midland AEC Inspection Reports - 1971 W 5 Midland AEC Inspection Reports - 1970 ' ..',, - 6 Quality Assurance Midland - AEC Mts. 4-17-73 ALAB-106 [#b , 7 Midland AEC Inspection Report 73-01 Restart of Construction w' ' dh re . . 8 Midland Crack in Containment AEC Inspection Report 73-05 ,,' 9 Midland Donald smith / stored Materials AEC Inspection Reports 73-05 10 Mid1cnd AEC Inspection Reports 73-05 Restoration Actirities. : 11 Midland Inspection Report 73 Audit of Bechtel ' Eng. 73-08
~
12 Midland AEC Inspection Reports 73-09 ' Audit Procedures . ' Manual 13 Handouts for Press Conf. Caduelding 11/27/73 14 .. Midland AEC Inspection Report 73-10 Cadwelding 15 Midland AEC Letters - Misc. Responses 16 Midland' AEC - (ALAB-106) Amendment & Order 17 Midland AEC - (ALAB-106) S.ag. Intervenor's Motion to Enforce ALAB-106 -
.L 18 Midland AEC - (ALAB-lO6) Cond.1 QA Action Being Taken 19 ,
Midland AEC - (ALAB-123) Decision Author Constr. Permits s 20 Midland AEC - (ALAB-123) Mapleton Intervenors Petition . For Review of AEC Decisien 21 - Midland AEC - (ALAB-132) AEC to File Inspec. Report, - Cond 2 Info., & Cramants on Cond. 1
, ~ Q rf)!*
t >a
yp c ', c
^ .[?j. }
.3 . y, 22 . Midland - (AIAB-lh7) Denics Saginaw Intervenors' Motion
- to Enf. AIAD-106/Bechtel to Rev. QA Org.
. < 3. ;
23 Midland AEC - (AIAB-152) Audits of Bechtel Eng. '?
-(Rev. of Bechtel QA Org.) ,
24 Midland AEC - (AIAB-162) Dismissal of Saginau 1 Intervenors' Motion to Enf. AIAB-152 .
.q u gaj 25 Midland AEC - Order to Show Cause Suspension of ~ .- ,
Activities .' f^
- 26 Midland AEC - Letters to SHli
- ' .,(. ,
27 Midland AEC - Letters to RCY ,
},. qjj c
. m, .
28 Midland AEC - (ALAB-106) Nonconf. Reports Monthly 1
* ' f;.:3 f ,
29 Midland AEC - (AIAB-106) Nonconf. Reports Quarterly
, r . .
30 Midland - Doi Meetings < P,
,~L" 31 Midland,Qualit'y Assurance - Meetings (Internals) '
.' e 32 Midland Progress Report - Bechtel N,
.;y, 33 Midland Monthly Report File 0502
- N -~.
- 34. . Midland ceneral ' 1.
m. 35 Midland Quality Assurance General ~
' ' ir 36 Midland Quality Assurance - Letters to AEC ,
37 Midland Quality Assurance - Manual .
~
38 Quality Assurance AEC - Appenlix B 39 Conf.inChicago7/18/73 40 ~ Quality Assurance - AEC Meeting on QA 41 Quality Assurance - Audit by AEC j i 42 Quality Assurance - Bechtel Program 1 43 Quality Assurance CPCo. Organization l
.44 Original - NUS Midland QA Evaluation .
Consultants - Gru=an Aerospace
'_ n " Jii
k G; ,
-e.
' ~il;ip
.- ~
- g . ,
4 45 - Quality Assurance Consultants - I*uclear Service Corp. ~; , 46 Quality Assurance - Consultants Kuclear Utility Services 47 ~ Quality Assurance - Consultants - Rockwell Intl. Corp. f 48 . Quality Assurance - Consultants - U.S. Testing Co., Inc. ? 49 Quality Assurance - Evaluation Meetings - . ; 50 Quality Assurance - General , . 51 Quality Assurance - Other Companies >'
,;w; 52 Quality Ass'urance - QA Procedure on Start-Up
, a;,3 ;;3
.yy 53 Qu'ality ' Assurance - Standard IT 45 2
~
4 &g] << l;gQe,Q 54 Quality Assurance 'Bechtel Program '
-'w 4 , -;;
55 . Midland Cadwel'd Prob 1cm _- 'M
;u 56 Midland ' 3
..f 57 Meeting with Alden Yates 2 PM - Ann Arbor 3/12/74 l'
. .y ,
58- ManagementQAMeetings/Mid-Q5/13/74-1 PM - SHHowell's Office M~. _ nN 59 Current !!idland QA Meeting , , , 60 Midland Consultant .;
~ '
D. , FILEC OF R. C. YOU::GDAHL (Senior Vice President) D-1 Midland Plant - AEC - Docket No. 50-329-330 Official ' Documents 2 Midland Personnel Assignments _ , 4 3~ Quality Assurance
;4 Staff Meeting Notes 5 Quality Assurance Services 6 Midland Show Cause Order
'7~ Midlar Quality Assurance ,
l
; 1
~. a ,
_ _: . ta
- -e'
=',. +-- ,- . .
,. f- _, ,
. ..),J5 ;;
.A 5 ,
A
. y>
'8 Midland Pirin .
W - 9 Final Decision , 10 Initial Decision - Exception to I, 11 Initial Decision ,
'f.k. ,
12 Dow - Consumerc Meetings
, ( %,,
) yu
~ ~
13' AEC - Inspections
'14 Board of Directors Minutes of Meetings ~
T
.- : Ms 15 l-Midland .Shole 1ause Misec11aneous $?YONO 16 Quality Assurance
<@$4
. x% 7d,):?,n ,
17 Resume . Slt;J:*
. - .a .:xey 18 Chron File
- e m:~S ;q .
19 RCYoungdahl Chion File of Correspondence 5/1/64 - f 12/31/66-12/31/71 - w?.,? s ,-: 20 - Chronologice.1 File RDAllen 39M-1970 N
+ . . ;y*
a-E. MIDIAND QUALITY ASSURtd!CE SERVICES DEPARTMEITT (General Files) E-1 1.0 ' General File Ind'ex - r.. 2 2.1 General EPP QA Manual and Program 3 2.4.2 General P & P Training Procedures 4 2.4.2 Notes for PQASD Training Program
'5 25 General Indoctri: . tion & Training Records (c) 6 3.1 General Codes )'s, 7 3.4.3 General Regulatory Guides 8 3.4.4 General Categories of Violations of AE Regulatory Requirement
- 9. 5.2 . General EPP P & P Manual *
+-
A et : s'
- ' 5 .. ;, ' ,
, ,,u. ,
' 5 r **
.. c- -_~ .-- _. .. , ,
s j; 7
<: ; r 5,.
6 ;. . e- k
~
10 5.3 General EPP QA Program Audit Manual 11 5.8 Project Engineering Services Procedures , .t 12 7.1 General Manufacturer's Abbreviation List , 13 7.2 General Consultants (Ey name) -
"? :k>;v e 14 7.2 Southwest Research Institute ,
General PQAS Department Deviations (Chron Filc) ~N' 15 16.1 - 16 7.2 ITT Grinnel,1 Corp. [ . . @ __ , '> p 17 18.0 Misc.(CQHillsAu'itSched. Notes) , RMT
-r - - :. . n, . -
u'4 g;8 4 18 18.2 General Audit' Assistance Procedures Q,O::: 18.3 General Audit Reports (Chron File)
~
, "jja "
19 l'::: & 20 18.3.5 General Plant)!cdifications m, - :y; a.', . 21 18.3.6 General Project Quality Assurance Services N /- y
- / :W:: ylj:p [I 22 GSKeeley - 1974
; . 2 ,1, 23 TWBoves - 1974 USY, e
24 MEDeHaem - 1974 . t GWFord - 19,74 y' 25 26 cQHills - 1974
- TJMarz - 1974 27 .
28 HWSlager - 1974 _ i GSKeeley - 1973 l 29 30 CQHills.- 1973 ,
. , .lr, 31 -
-HWSlager - 1973 '
. )
i
~'
32 Miscellaneous Correspondence (GsKeeley)
~
_ [ T
\ > :.
r . . ,' 4 p
. ":/
gy L Y b; n K
~
- ;p -
... *- e
. . , ,. Sy g
.ya ',, , ,?
. vn 7 ';4 6 3 -
e .1I e F. n e;4 -.e
. w, "t.
MIDLAtID PROJECT DEPARTMEi:T VM; "
?
- (Midland Ficfd Engineering Files) , ,
.gGl
. L njd F-1 0001 Index - Filing ,
y 1 y,y'ag 2 0120' Consultants ,
\'m/d
_ yig:;) v~, . ~
. 3 0130 Contract-ConsumersPcuer/Bechtel .;.(@; $)
rg , 14 0131 Contract'-ConsumersPower/USSSVendor
~
1 ,.::Il 5 0135 contract-ConsumersPower/Dow , i . ,j@
, - ~ } pge 6 0L36 Contract-ConsumersPower/Others - ,;t.E
. ..>p . . c.m
.e
~
v 7 J150 Costs - Estimates - General , ' ,'; p. y .gg 8 Inspection - General " 4Q47 0230 , C'3. J#17 x DA 9 0272 1974 Meetings ,- Construction w (j$$ 10 0280 Meetings - General (Trip Reports) '
.:g;;
[$ 9[;
/ .:...a : . *
. .. . - : - w 11 0289 Meetings - Vendors ' Y fY T.g ._
. ' .g;%:,:
12 0400 Personnel - General . ; ,:,y p in N E
. . j p 13 0400.6 Personnel-Qualifications / Resumes W j ;ji'
;;;; t.7, x,. -
14 0400 7 Personnel - Training , 9 15 0456 Procedures - Project
. ? " ,f' .
16 0460 - Quality Assurance - General '[
. , c 17 0460.1 Quality Assurance - PAW _ [ _h 18 0460.21 . Quality Assurance - AEC Audits & Correspondence 3:
,u; 19 0460.3 Quality Assurance - Consumers Power Co.
20 O'460.4 Qu311ty Assurance - Q List
- c: .. .
. -%v
'21 0460.5 CPCo Quality Program f4M3 20 0461 Quality Assurance - Desi6n Control ,
If 1 i a
.23 0480 Purchasing - General (Requisition Register) 2 24' 10481 Purchasing Eidder's List s
25 0485 Government Regulation & Permits
- m. . . ,M O b y % ,
o .
- c g y\
m__ -
._ __ _ ,. M ! 1 !gJ,LJ
nnw .. _ n. . n. - _ ... , n. - -. . : n.- - - -- ww. n .
...s .w
% ggy -
. , , . , ce t
~.- -
.n M:#yyy.w .
j . ci L g by
.. si
,U '
1 q . 4:i
-7[ Y .
26 0485.1 AEC Guides and Criteria .
' ,e ,.3
- ef
. . . e
'27- 0485.2 AEC Construction Permit Application o , A w
28 0485 3 AEC Construction Pemit Hearing 1970 - 1971 h Mi s:$: m .r 29- 0485.4. AEC Construction Permit Hearing 1972 - 1973 % .; < _ ,;i 30 0485 7 . Alae-lo6, 123, 132 & Related Correspondence .$p6;w( : w.. 31 0485.9 AEC Show Cause Hearing 1974 '7 ', 32 0490 Public Relations (File #2) '[if, j;l,( ,
, w : m p.
- 33. Reports. Monthly to Howell 4 -
UM N
<=, ...5 !
34 0504 Reports - others . m$. , ,'Yy e .
? t g.iiT3 35 0505 Reports - Licensing Activities ' Eff;{
.w , u : .w . a 36 0505.2- AEC Lett.ers and Responses L 74-D y % .;: q. ,
37 0505.4 -Alternate Site PSAR and Environmental Reports -3 ,
, #)f:;
f; 38 0508 Reports - Project Status ia ^7:qq$ ";&l N W :?: .n 39 0517 Reports Critiet. Items ;{. p{
.g .
. 40 0519 Reports - Engineering Studic.-/Special Work Processes ' ,} W,
. , _u 41 0535 Reports - Bechtel Quality' Assurance { (']
42 0652 , Schedules ' Construction - 53 1000 ceneral Plant Arrangement & Access Cont:ol 1 .3 54 :1102 Inspection of Stored Material 55 1121 Structural Steel Framing j . 56- 1122 Concrete v 57: '1123 Wall Reinforcing-outside Face
'd ~
58- 1500 Site Investigation ,
- i
.59- 2100: Reactor Building !
60 2103'- i'ost Tensioning Materials - l 61-
.2121' Containment Shell Design 'v~
- p
-r . .
y " .l f ,$. 3 1
- 1:Y
- a ~ :L' O
, w. ;
=
, ;-c - - - -
3' V
~
s; l t
, ..3w, ... -:jgy;;, v l c y- e.s ,
-. . s.g :
3
.. .. , : s. .~. *;. .,
9- i <4.; ::tf .,
~*~ -< ,
- l. k{ $
, nn a ;
fS.- 62 2135 1NSS Equipment. Supports ,
,fJ '~ j '
. x:: ;
63 2165' ' Liner Plate. . 1;-%. M.
. ~ .
s w- - 64 2300. mfE) %; - Auxiliary Building a p%h 65 2310 Foundation
, / .M.a - ,;g 66- 2330 -Spent Fuel Pool l,;) fdM
, 4:: --c; 67 ~. 3705. Primary Co61 ant System *
, , _ j.h.[Es
. :. a . : .
. ~. - 68 .~3706. Lur Inspection of PCS - +e N7p, 3y
.-c w 69; 3707 In-Servic vibration Monitoring
- f4 g,m~x; ->
g
' :a. e 70 3710 Makeup and Purification System j
n>h;'y@!Q,
^
?
n mw&s> 71 3721 . Decay Heat Removal System - -[P v x< 2F,u .fi , , * . }M.f,ce s> 7 4 72 3725 containment Spray System
'fg'g
, n ;a ;
73- 3726 Thiosulfate System - . , ; 7.. .F q:qjp 7h- 3730 Core Flooding System ,
.. Jy@'
.- y43 m 75- 3760 .NSS Instrumentation and Centrols System pl./pye'
,.v v y 76- 3830 component Cooling water System }-.$ e
.x 77 4010 Flow Diagrama and P&ID -
M' f *. ' 78 4110'. Main Steam System 4 79 ~ 4111' - Flow Diag. Turbine Ext. - Unit 2
%).: ..
80 ~ 415.7 Auxiliary Feedu ':er System DE +g + t
~
81 .4300 Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning 82 5000' , , Piping 83: 5001. welding- <
~ - .
9, . 84 5002. -Nondestructive Examination s a" N' I;
- 85. . ,5425 cooling Pond Dike s .,
-86 :5430 ~ Service water System .~1 1 ,
,~;j
~
- 87 l6001' - . Single-Line' Diagrams '
i .
- 88 -6h00 ' Condui s:: end ;. 1ceways , , -
,.g. ,.
",.. ' ,M
~
l,.-
~
, , , s \
b L. .
- _ . ~
w a.. J . _n- W.sr-MW %
. ~.
.I * [k ,
- @d ;
s,. _,,..
. . , . - . =. . -
) 10 ~
+
e 4.6 , i nn p , (5
- y. , . -c . 1 5.y 1 '
89 6800 Station Grounding & Cathodic Prot?ction ,
, ['. ,
- A:
90 BW to Bechtel i -
- Q '. ~'
G K,q 91 B&W Incoming ,
.. o 4
, mm ,-
y '
~ 92 ,
QA Documents to Intervenors .. .
, . - 3
} -}
93 A Waterproof Membrane - Substructure , _ .
~
- .P )
- ~.
. 4. .-
94 C-2' Post Tensioning . 7;e a.- O ,
C-2A Post Tensioning - Embeds a 1s.;c
'95 -
h@ 96 C-2B Post Tensio'ning System - Tendons ,
/Ng.'
- $,;& Spa
.;e;g.ig 97 C-8 . Material Testing Services
.? ymm y 98 C-23 Pipe - Circulating Water J Mc ' Md59
' i , D$M 99 C-30 Concrete-Fur $1shandDeliver ; ;!j%;j
- y ;%. . c, .
loo C-31 Concrete - Pla,cing and Finish , _ , ',.. ' WS.
, ;s g 101 C-32 Water Stop.
, ;fLZ.ft
- . n:e.-10
- v. y , n z '. s .
$MJi 102 C-33 Miscellaneous Metal Wor'.c
?!&l;c,.
103 C-34 SteelFloorDeck(Forms) ' I{,[
. c
- 104 C-36A StructuralSteel-A/Bto603 .r#-
105 C-38 , Purchase of' Structural Steel $cy? 106 C-39 Reinforcing Steel
~::, ,:
~
107 C-43 Stainless Steel Liner Plate 108 C-44 Fuel Pool Gates e 109 C-46 Fuel Transfer Tube - 36" . j. 110 ~C-50A. Reactor Liner Plate .- . :, G
, :c, 111' C-50B Reactor' Building Locks and Doors 112 C Steel Pipe for Embedment Sleeves 113 ' C-52 ihickened Liner Plate . . -
o .s . , > 114'. .C-55 Cadweld Rebar Splices m 115 C-66 . Purchase of Miscellancsus ::ctal - s- . .; ,
- s
-y > rs "a} ; , %
'y* *W ,$
A NY ' t rs.: YA Q
;;;b M s w.
.* " 1
- t
- *e:
- ' ~
- -- n; ,- ai,;
k 1 1 116L 'C-llo ' Recoating of Containment Euilding Liner Plate ,
, e ' ~@1. '
117- C-111 Erection of Reactor Building Liner Plate y ,' o:
~ .'
. 118 C-208 Material Testing Services ' .: ,
, .A 119. C-alo Earth.ork [
f. w 120 ~ C-227 Fabrication, Coating,Wraf. g Brine Line Pipe
", s '
and Furnishing of Fittings und Valves _ .3
,.Y."
121 C-230 Concrete - Furnish and Deliver -
'[-k
;m 122 C-231 Foming, Placing & Curing of Concrete -
- jN
.x g:
123 -C-232 Waterstop ; ^' ? 7 .
+ '
124 C-233 Purchase of Miscellaneous Metal ,
,-h
, y .n :
125 C-243' Liner Plate fo.r Spent Fuel Pool Area ' .. ; 1. s
- r o ,.
ik ?g a 126 C-255 Cadweld Rebar j Splices jj 5p E-1 Main Transfomers 127 _ rj{ 3 128 E-2 Unit Auxiliary Transfomers 4--
. " . :. 3 6 >
r; pm; 129 E-4 Start-Up Transfomers O s-r s^ 130 E-5 Switchgear, 7200v and 416cv , x 131 E-6 Load Centers, 480V ' 132 E-7 Motor Control Centers 133 E-iO General Require:nent for Irduction Motors , 134 E-ll Battery Chargers 135 E-19 Preferred AC Power Supplies 136 E-20 Cable Penetrations
~
l -137 E-21 Power Cable, 8kV and 5kV' I 138 E-29 5000, 8000,'15,000 volts /cCable ; i-139 .E-30 600 volts /c&M/cCabL . 140 E-31 _ Conduit i141~ - E-32 crounding' Material wire and Rods k-.- ,
.- . , . , _ , ,. ~~l A.
m . , .- . .~ . - ; .. ., .. w - . . - .,
.- - ~ .-_=wp'
* ' d g,',,;.ll
,a
, '.- i, ..
y :c'j '
.4 , i
. . q .., '
^
, j: .
i 142 E 42 Conduit & Cable Tray notes, Symbols and Details 143 E-205 Purchase of Metal Clad Suitchccar m ;, a M, 144' G-1 Purchase Orders JE ' 145 G-1A Purchase Orders ', S: DK. 146 -G-2 Subcontracts - .@ "M
. n, 147 G-2A Subcontracts 79
( m 148 G-3 Shop Painting of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment E rg;p-149 G-6 Earthquak[ResistantDesign '
.;F':, ham 4.
, y ;y 150 'G-7 Earthquake Resistant Design ,
' -:4';Z' 4 151 G-20 General Requirements for Supplier Quality Assurance Programs
.?
.. , ::39 y
W 152 G-21 General 7 equi);ements for Supplier Quality Control '.L Programs (empty) J
.1 153 G-22 General Requirements for Subcontractor Quality , , ,
Assurstnco Pre 3rms W<' s c. 154 G-23 General Requirements for Supplier Quality > Assurance Programs ., 155 G-24 Shop Painting of Steel an'd Inorganic Zine Coating 156 G-25 General Pr6 ject Requirements for Non-Destructive
- Examinati an Procedures 157 G-26 Reactor Building Environmental Conditions for Design Basis Accident a
~158 J-204 Purchas>. of Major Instrument Package 159 J-253 Atmosphe-ic Steam Dump Valves -
3
~160 J-255 Purchase of nuclear Service Control Valves ";
'161 J-257 Purchase of Severe Service Control Valves s 162- .M-1A- USS Scope of Supply 163- M-1B- "nSs' Suspension lO -
M-l'.0 NSS General - m
..dv,
- n. . .. .
- r. -
,. '4 .*s
+
g _f . u ,p;N. i-
..J-
-13 , :6
(
.. .;,7
.. ':7;.
165 M-1. l' NSS - Reactor Vessel ) #5j
.a
~ "
166 M-1.2 NSS - Reactor Vessel Internals _S
- )
o$7. 167 M-1.4 USS Control Rod Drives
. . N.
3
- d. *4i
-NSS '- Control Rod Drive Pouer Suppliers 168 M-1.5 . J ;
,; 3:
169 M-1.6 NSS - Steam cenerators +" ?.
-- s .
.vt 170 M-1.7 . USS - Reactor Coolant Pumps ci s-171 -M-1 9 NSS - Reactor Coolant Piping , -[l.jh[ -
o
* ,(' v 172- M-1.10 USS - Presshrizer [' f @ ;9pp -
173 M-1. ll ' NSS - Pressurizer Spray and Relief Valves cy, ,5;[.: ,,pf n-, 174 M-1.12 NSS - Steam Generator' Safety Valves > N'JYN (Main Steam Lines)
- < [ .nI d'd (j : 5 175 M-1.13 USS - Letdown Coolers - :3 ;;
/ > ;w 176 M-1.16 NSS - Makeup Pumps s CN ,
177 M-1.17 HSS - Decay Heat Removal Punpa
<8 J 9.Yp Mi:
178 M-1.18 USS - Decay Hect Coolers 7M.;, a 179 M-1.19 NSS - Core Flooding Tanks
, M .
180 M-1,20 USS - Demineralizers ,
,'l _
.c-181 M-1.21 NSS - Filters ?"-I l
- r. l 182 ~K-1.26 NSS - Turbine Bypass System *
)
183- M-1.27 USS - Remote Operated Valves & Miscellaneous Valves
, ~;i 184 M-1 31 N3S - Nuclear Instrumentation & Reactor Protection System 185 M-1 32 NSS - Safeguards Actuation System ,-
186 M-1.33 USS - Integrated Control System [' 187 M-1.34 NSS - Incore MonitorinS System . 188 M-1.41 NSS - Chemical Addition System l
' ~
189_ M-2~ Nuclear Fuel 190 -
.M-4 Main Condensers and Auxiliaries
,m q-s -k ,, lK${}
~*gi
, ,g y -
, .. . e -
* , , ...- , ,~ c ,2 .
. , .? ? ?
" 3l.'
t lh: "; ; a.;
, , .,O' n; 6N c' . - -
191 M-5 Closed Feedwater Heaters and Drein Coolcra ,~1 192 M-6 Deacrating Fecdwater Heaters , y 193 M-7 Steam Generator Fced Pu=ps and Fced Dooster Pumps , 5 c 194 M-10 Condensate Dcmineralizers .r-1.;g'i .t j.. 195 M-12 Condenser Tubes [.; ,5 ?
.. . .p 196 M-24 Miscellanecus Horizontal Centrifugal Pumps
~
- y 57 35
,;g 197 M-26. Miscellaneous Carbon & Stainless Steel Tanks ,.e
,w
, , , MW 198 M-40 Reboilers .c,.y
. . .. !% m :
Component Cooling Heat Exchanger 199 M-51 '
,r:p ]lff./ :gg 200 M-52 Component Cooling Water Pipe f, if .g 201 M-54 Reactor Buildi'ng Spray Pumps " W7.'
,r
- C D' 202 'M-56 Purchase of Spent Fuel Pool and Safeguard Chilled $hp Water Pump , '} ,,f
. g .y, :
' 7.;'i?: E 203 M-59 Misecllanecus In-Lir.c Centrifugal Pum:s 204 M-61 Makeup Filters gj/,c>.j 205 M-63 Radwaste & Fuel Pool Filters .
206 M-64 Misec11aneous Nuclear Tanks i
. ')
\
207 M-65
- Miscellaneous Pressure Vessels ,,
s '(, j
~
208 M-66 Purchase of Radicactive Waste System Evaporator and Accessories , - - 209 M-67' Stainless Steel Sump Pump , 210 M-68 Radwaste Gas Compressors ,
+-
211 M-92 Reactor Building Crane . 1 212 M-93 . Auxiliary Euilding Crane - h
- 213 M-101 Atm. Radwaste Drain Piping
- 214 M-102 : Shop Fa~o.~ Embed Stainless Steel Pipe d
215 M-104A Shop Fab. Huglear Steam & Service Piping, 2-1/2" . f4
~ ,
- r; _.9
* ~ . ,' ; g
- -, ' s, .
, ,, 7 .; @ '
, . 7, o o
* - , s ,.
.Ma
. . 15 -
j; g.;.4
!%e
,t 216 M-105
- Shop Fab. Embeded Stainless Steel Pipe ,
Q',{ 217 M-106 Pipe Hangers - Nuclear and' Cony. '. .M@ , ' %' 218' ~ M-109 Atm. Radwaste DR Pipe A/B and R/D c?
- x. , e :
l 219 M-110 Pipc' Pct.etrations
. . .a ,f 220 'M-ll6 valves - C00# Carbon Steel Non-nuclear ,' ' .' Ce.. .
221 M-116A Non-Nuclear, Carbon Stocl, Stcp Check valves 900# ANSI ~ ,, [I'
. 222 M-116B- Non-Nuclear, Carbon Steel, Gate valves C MM At:SI . .[
n;: 223 M-117 valves .Nuc' lear Service C. h er S., 2-1/2" and Larger,
- 1
[L 'J
- 600M_and~M16 s. -.sa.; n.y~
224 M-ll8 valves - 600# Carbon Steel Nuclear (Tested) e .v.f;j i s .. e 225 M-119 valves - 150-400# Carbon Steel Non-Nuclear . >jYi
- 3. -p o 226 M-120 Nuclear Service valves
/
~: 'Mh;,
.ap valves - 600# Stainless Steel Nuclear, 2-1/2" and Larger ^ .
227 M-123 [" 3] 228 M-124 N0n-Nuclecr Service Valvc . L ,I., 3.s . 229 M-125 valves - 150-400# Carbon Steel Nucicar - ?,$ a 230 M-127 valves - naclear Service (CS) {>- '
, 231 M-129 valves - Nuclear Service (SS) -
232 M-133 Butterfly valves - Non-Nucicar - 233 M-138 Circulating water Butterfly valves J-e 234 M-156 vane Axial Fans 235 M-157 vane Axial Fans - 236- M-158 Large Roof Exhaust Fans . 237 M-201 Shop Fab. Piping for Nucicir Serv'.cc i 238 M-202 Shop Fab. Conventional Steam Service Pipin5 , 239 M-204 ~ Field Fab, and Installation of Piping and .' Instrumentation for Nuclear Service , m 240 M-205 Field Fab. and Installation of Conventional Steam and Serviec Piping and Instrumentation for a nuclear Power ma -
'. in
, , [d.y
- ,. .o . .
. , . TG 3.,f:' %
~
116' , . ~.. *
; s., .
Non-Nucicar Service Valves '2-1/2" iip 3 and Larger 241 M-222
. ,4 242 M-1.39 USS - Decay Heat Renoval System '
'w 243 C-lo Clear, Grade and Earthwork ,
< - 1, 244 Daily Log
,1, n 245 I." Document acview Spee's & Reg's
- :~;; t 246 II. Document neview Drawings ,
~
. 247 III. Document Review - Miscellaneous >cuments ,
m , y.q. ... 248 Jackson Correspondence Log 1/1/73-4/16/73 - x y .g 5A~
~
j[
~
249 Jaekson Correspondonce Log 4/16/73-9/5/73 '-
, '1.
v L,e ,, 250 Jackson Correspondence Log 9/6/73-12[25/i3 -
. r . , c. ,.
. 251 Jackson Correspondence Log 1/1/74-4/8/74 , f;l f 252 JacksonCorrc;pondenceLog4/9/74-Date ~f [ q; 253 Midland Correspondence Los 1/3/73-7/12/73 'i/4 a 254 Midland'CdrespondenceLcc 7/17/73-11/21/73 G. . :. 255 Midland Correspondence Log 11/21/73-12/31/73 - 256 Midland Correspondence Log 1/1/74-4/16/74 , , 257 -MidlandCor,respondenceLog4/17/74-Date 258 I TCCecke - Unlabeled ,
' ' ~
259 TCCooke - AEC 260 TCCooke - Field Organization 261 TCCooke - QA Keel 148-72 . g,
, - e -
EllGII:EERI"G SERVICES DEPART:E?iT
.G .Cron File -~CQHills - 1972
-2 Cron File - CQHills - 1971 3 Cron File - CCHills - 1970 .
41 Cron File -: CQ'! ills - 1969 ,
,i .- ' e t ,
v- - - - -- -
* ~:
.- -. e :w +. _ _ _ .)
fg
~
'. , p.6;., g .);)
-y pW,.;p F -
17
- ~
as ,
.,. 1
. , - s; ,
, .' . q ,. , y, .
. , ,q , ,
,:W,*
}( , .
- ~ ~ ...
. . M.,yy,. . . , . ,
MTDIM:D QUALITY ASSURA*~CE SER"TCEd DEPART *EllT 4plg7, (Field Files) .? c., N0s . w:<g; it - 1 . Daily Logs - REWhittak er -
.'fa..2, ny. ~ +
--* m a ec i 2 - QA Chronological File .
- . , p,.. _N..A ,,
'i."A'.'
3 - Daid Logs closed Through The J.ast Month (Donald E. Horn)' f ' t.. Daily Logs - D. R. Keating e f s' 7,: , 4 .7- -
. ~..- n;a: ' + ..=,,>-f. :y a
5 . Daily Logs JLCorley -. E'pw@.E ,f 5 t
. : qec-Fy: :1kt: w
- 3. .
,e n ~ bgm u <
' y Mu.c7! . . m# INN,. '
u san-M l MIDLAND PROJECT DEPARTMEI!T ,2 i GTIMI Midland Plant Engineering Files ( , .: Wl .,:w.3Nh ay e s . 5-i v '/ I-1 0001 Index - Filin g,- -
- 6. m.fg. ,1l.
rcM,d 2 0020 Accounting - General , 97%#c , 3 0040.4 ihala'ueled 7; j^f ! Contains a telegram fro Bechtel to Consumers Power . Power Compsny concerning a telegram which was sent to the- J.ij Boilermake 's Union. .,- Q;M l
~ .
, x:a 4 0070 Budgets & Forecasts -
yw
- . . .n: ..
5- 0090 . Construction Facilities ym
, :- v 6 . 012,0: Consultants , .r ts-
.n , ,
7 Contractconsumsrs/Bechtel 0130 - N. - ., 8 0131' 'Contractconsumers/NSSSVendor
.~.c
..._,y. __
ContractConsumers/Dow(3 folders) ". 9 0135-w? % Opi o < 10 0150 Cost Estimates - General - M.j'. 7;q
'g:; .
I '11~ 0153.2 Planning & Scheduling Program ^
" !M
~-
,%3 12 0230 Inspection - General a,
\ .. a -
-13 0280 Ne~etings General (Trip Reports) (4 folders) qv$, .j~. .
- l. ..
Meetings - Vendors (3 folders) 1 -, R:
;14' 0289 n ~em o.2
. '15: t :0400 ' Personnel - General <
$ *'4
~ ~
-S
.g_.
,, a ' h;. . .
m e .M
* ~ + - . < Wi;;&;Q
m... __ m - ~. - __ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _
. , : - - G .i ,
g 18 C 8 te.k
~
g 2: , t 16 0100.71 Unlabeled. -
~ ,. "'M
, Contains the Midland Plant. training program.
, m
-17 0456 Procedures Project (2 folders) (j 18 .0456.1' Temporary Deviation Requests & Deviations
, 'L.,
,9 1 0460 Quau ty Assurance (3 folders) '
9: 20 0460.1 B&W Quality Assurance Plan . Y;W 21 OhCO.2 ' QA-AEC Audit & Correspondence X['"~ r
. .~ _m -
22 0460.3 Quality Asapance Criteria Index . n :. yV(%
.y q g ; :
- 23 -0460.4 RevisionI of Su= nary 4 List '
.- 5. m ." . gl .
d *
,, ,, A4's i$k.):I 24 0460.5 CPCo. Field Quality Assurance
_ ,.w 25 0461 Quality Assurance Design Construction , 4
- n: ..
'26 0463 Quality Assurapee CPCo. Correspondence ])[
.%r
%^'M; 27 0480 Purchasing - General (Req Reg)
M ",. . 28 0481 Purchs::ing Sidders' List
'. Q.y
[$[ - 29 0485 Government Regulation & Permits :. - , 30 0485 1 AEC Guide: & Criteria (3 folders) . V.3
. - .v 31 0490 Public Relations
_1 . 32 0501 -Reports Weekly Progress , 33 0502 Reports Monthly to S. H. Howell - G: 34 0 503 Reports Bechtel Progress , 351 0504 Reports - Other _- 36 .0505. Reports Licensing Activities -
'37 0505.1- Reports AEC PSAR (2 folders) [
38_ 0505.2 AEC Letters & Responses' (3 folders) a 39 0505.4 A.lternate Site PSAR & Environmental Reports (3 folders) .
- 40. L0505.6' (Licensing) Reports AEC Interrogatories (2 folders) f' 41 ~0505.7 (Licensing) Record of Material Provided to AEC Staff [
.-r-
-I
_'I m
, .y sL &
< . %c
?
;, my .
a.,
,. .' ., , 4;
.s + m ,,y
' tb ,
,;a 19 y x
ny. x U-42- 050' (Licensing) Safety Analynis (AEC) Etc. . f'
, . l; :
43 0508 Reports (PSAR) Procurement ~ Status Report , d 44 '0517 Reports Critical Ite-s 45 0519 '; Unlabeled _ , Reports and engineering studies. . f, , , g@, 3 46 0535 Bechtel quality Assurance , 47 0650 Schedules General , 1:9 48 0652 Schedules Construction
^
. #' il ,
~
49 0700 Codes & Str.ndards ,
. Ojfdl[I
^ xdn:z.s
.r 50 071o Start-up -
J w
, v : ..
- 2 W .4 Start-Up USSS \rendor Pre-Op Test Procedures 51 0712 7 d);; < ,
'l![
0720 Studies - General 2 <C 52 s . 53 0730 Subcontract Bidders' Lists ~ d
'i;J@:?
- 54. 0750 Telephone W mos
.AF A 1 55 1000 ceneral Plant Arrangement & Access Control (3 folders) ,,
~ ~ 7 "2 ..
56 1101 Design Criteria , 57 1102 Inspection of Stored Material { 58 1121 Structural Steel-59 112e Concrete 60 1123 Reinforcing ,, 61' 1126 Unlabeled Contains a Q List . ~ 62 1175 NSS Shipment - 63 1500 Site Investigation
-64 1650 Geology & Seismology 65 l2100 , Reactor Building . ,
'66- .2103 .Po.t Tensioning V.aterial 9 67 ,
2115 Containe.ent Testing Procrn
, , c .
' - h ,,,
a s
-wt
/ . . sq .-
n _ .: ' r,% y;, ,
~- q- . ,
- ]~ " ]g.; j
~
, 20 %'i '\
. > .: 1;.
.- ,', ,1
~
* ~'
~
68 -2116. .Containnent Coatings , c ,
. - -c ,..,
R 'M . 69 2121 Containment Shell Design rs .gy 70- 2122 Containment Shell Ccnstruction , $-:[fv, 4
~
.n.
. 71' 2135 USS Equipment Supports , y!.
. 7 Jk[
Liner Plate 72 2165 73 2200 Turbine Building
'~
,_ f -
.e,-
74 2310 Foundation ';.-j;y].f, c
. . nv Spent Fuel Pool *y 75 2330 .
.. . . . .y .
'.?l. ,*:,i f ar 76 3705 ' Primary Coolant System -
- Ty,ggl, Ur Inspection of PCS (3 rolders) 4;H, 2,:N- :ea.W 77 3706 .e a
, gs ;
78 3707 In-Service vibration Monitoring . gy:m( Me 79 3715 Che:/.ica1 Addit on Sy., tem - ..
-w. ; ... , ~
80 3721 : Decay Heat Removal System _ , * ['N ws.m. h A.>+i, (.. 81~ 3725 Containment Spr:y System - r ;c- 3_:.;y% 6.'p' 82 3726 Thiosultate System g;.y 83 3730 Core Flooding System .U,, 84 3740 Fuel Handling System ,
. =
85' 3760 NSS Instrumentation & Control System . 86 3830 Component Cooling water Syst.em 87 3900 Radwaste System . 88 4010 Flow Diagrams & P & IDS ..
-4112 . Process Steam System
.89-.
c-90- 4115 Main Feedwater & Cendensate System ..
.91 .4300- Heating, Vent & Air Conditioning
- 92. 5000 ~ Piping . , ,
/
'93 5001 Weldins ( folders) J
-94 -5002- Non-Dastructive Ew i.n. tion of Stored Stainless Steel Piping; 'e< ..?
~
7:.,3
.,r ;- , .
a 7"
a _ . .. - - - - - . - - - ~ . .- . - - . . - -- - -- - _e
- . g- ,,.;
P.gf_ ;p;Fp
- u. -
..qa, Y 8-3y 'M
- ^-
21~ 4 'FN d 33-95 ?5050 - Valves Nu k : ! - s s. , 96' ;5200 Instrumentation & Controls. ' ' -
' 7p, . g4 j
97 -5400 . Circulating water System , .* _13 LU-
]; , :y'(]
98s, 5412- Cooling Pond _ o. j,C $.lI@f'
~
99 ,5425 Cooling Pond Dike s 100 6001 Single.Line DiaSrr.ns -
'yp[}, [',.
. +:7c. _
, 102 .6302. Emergency Power System ,
'Jyg 103 6400 . Conduit and Raecuays , , -MD '
dip '? 104 6800 Station Grounding & Cathodic Protection . I n -3
' n'i%.:w
.n . , n .a _ ::
~,: ' MM 105 A-l' . Waterprcof Membrane - Substructure .
s - wwg e 106 C-2A &
~
.C _ .
hb
'C-2B Post Tensioning System .
L'{fdM. m
/* ..
- Uj :;./,~
107 C-8 Material Testing Service .i w
"g..ie
..a .
108 C-10 Clear Grade & Earthwork , B.J A W. MME 109 C-15 Railroad Bridge Lig',g, M2 110 C-23 Pipe Circulating Eater 2%
- a. -
111 C-27A Shielded Steel Containment - ')V ' t. i *'
~
n2 C-30 . Concrete - Furnish & Deliver - e l 113 C-31. Concretc - Placing & Finish L; 2; l 114 C-32 Water Stop ;-l 115 C-33 Miscenancous Metal work n6 C-34 SteelFloorDeck(Forms) . . b. ~
,z ,,a n7 C-36A- StructuralSteelA/Bto603 ^ $j:7
+ :,*
118 C-36B' Structural Steel A/B ABV & TB
' 2 119 ~C-37 Furnishing & Erection of Structural Steel 120 C-38 Structural Steel w,..
121 Reinforcing Steel
' d C . .
122- C-43. . Stainless Steel Liner Plate .
. , ..s M.,.
u - re i
- ~4 -
., ,W- g(?., ,
^
- .1 '
?B
A
.e
.y .
-s
",- L. '
.a l;ry;q:i
.'*. , , . , 22 '9 [
- s. uc ,
, Y. ~_
'123' C-50A . Reactor' Liner Plate dye
. , V, ;
124 C-50B Reactor Edilding Locks and. Doors N ,,$
'w 1251 C . Steel Pipe for Embednent j:
.126 C-52 . Reactor Building Liner Plate '
f' e ,- 127 C-55 Cadwela Rebar Splices _ ; 9/c > gu
, , " . l1 ;., s 128 C-66 Unlabeled ..
Will be lab led Purchase of Miscellaneous Metal. .
, - h:*
129 C-110 Recoating Containment Building Liner Plate' < W
, r, 130 C-lll . Reactor 13uilding Liner Plate Erection , 'iN f
~
; , :, . b.;;
131 C-208 Material Testin Services .
=
' w. n .e
. = ' 4 p ?g .
132 _ .C-210 Earthwork (4 folders) ~
@f
.s .
. Ni~
133 C-227 Fabrication of Brine Line Pipe Furnishing Fitting & Valves ,j<
+
., q
,/ <
134 C-230 Concrete - Furnish & Deliver
. 3, , e.g, .
135 C-231 Concrete - Finishing & Placing 1 ; W sgt
' e . , ,
136 C-232 waterstops i e :7m . 1
-137 C-233 Purchase of Miscellaneous Metal 5""
~
Liner Plate / Spent Fuel Pool Area
~
138 C-243 ., 139. C-255 Cadweld Rebar Splices . 140 E-1 ' Main Transforter - 141 E- Start-U' Transformer , n 142' E-5 Switch Gear 7200V & 4160V 143- E-6 Load Cente:s 480V , 144 'E-10 Motors- _ ;- 145 .E-20 Cable Penetrations , 146 .E-21 Power Cable, 8KV and SKV f. 147 .E-29 dable Specifications .
'E-30 J 148' ~ Cable Specifications _
.149L E CondulI, , 'k D* 1 l , , y .
j
'Y
. , . . ';y
, , ._. ~ ,
- r. . w, .a .. . -- - . _ _ - _ - - . . ,.- _._ _ .--._ . .--- . . . , .
8, .g .;5 ,m;&Mte .. . . . , . 1 - * ,
- e-- +? y ,. 5gg.g .
~ '
, c , ,-. ./ ,f j -
z .
, x . w n@ w,
- . :::d;4; 23~
Og 4~,y .
.n. ~.
-<iWr .m IV: -n
.150 . E-SOS
- Switch Gear Specifications y$g s- y e, 151 G-1 & -
N G-1A Purchase Order d%niQ :M my;.4
'152 G-2 & - V; G-2A Subcontracts -
.f Q%yy
- ts -g+.r 7 L 'f w 153 .G-3 ' Shop Painting- -
ww, 1. ; )b y(;{ 3 ea
. n- -a .9 0. n 154 . G-4 General Welding -
- p. %m %,.; 9 u
p. 4Qb'Ag
*/*.m ,
, 155 G-5 Local Control Panels ,
u pU =.y ps
- w-i p.
156 .G-6 & w' ec@pg; G-7 Earthquake Resistant Design ." +E ?e g!Kh-x . w. gin
. ms(
157 G-8 Protective Coating Inc. .
- ; 9 Mdy!%j
-n ci m; w.a.y,+ .
158 G-9 valve Motor Operators
. . .' GNV4@Mi xw.m.. .
; ,4gi%;
159 G-10 valve Air Operator G
/ A 4:s;A:w%
. V.%
160 G-20 & J ' V".5f'T G-21 Quality Assurance Specification ', -M m gA K
,; .XSN[%t .;
161 G-22 Quality Assarance .
'*i,M.y.SP
@. wMk 162 G-23. General R uirements i for Suppliers q
~f E. > .e .
<re -
163 G-24 Shop Priming of Steel /InorSanic Zine - *
, cep'
. ?q m ,
164 G-25 Unlabeled . ' A Contains materials relating to nondestructive ??'
. . examination procedures. , .
' .? ,
.165' J-2Ol Controllers, Recorders and Trans 7 y
166 J-204 Major Instrusent Panel ;N 167 J-211 Area & Process Radiation Monitoring System ,
. 168 J-216 Level Co' trollers ; .
i
.s .
169' J-226- Level Switches '
. l' i 170 J-228. Pressure & Temperature Switches ., _.
171 J-22) .-Thermo Couples 'RTD Wells , , i 172- .J-253 Atmospheric Steam Dump Valves .";- #-
)
j
- ~
JNon-Nuclear Service Control Valve I 173 J-254 , ,, g
~ .
;174L J-255~ ' Control Valvec . J n ,1. 3
- c
,~
. a,..t J
.; y *
+
, . M .,3; j e',
- v z ',
.(._ 7, . -[2 . ,'[
~
* * ^
* - ,, l
.,,. .v - .x
,'s
' -~
,24 :
m
}-
4 n
, ?- .
175 M-1B - NSSS' Suspension' '['
,3. - ,
~176 M-lC. 11spection & Expediting . Reports -
- g{;
177 'M-1.0 JNSS -General (4 folders) . [, 178 TM -1.1 HSS Reactor Vessel (2 folders) s .
.se ,
179 M-1.21 NSS Reactor Vessel Internal .
= , ,
180 M-1.4- NSS Control Rod Drives - . .M [ ' I
+
,, [> f'1 l 181 M-1.5 HSS Control Rod Drive PWR Etc. -..'M u
%,' <; 4 .
1 182 M-1.6 NSS Steam Gqncrator (2 folders) ' - * @g Qp?'. l l
/ y.Q,f I
~
183 M-1.7 ' . Reactor Coolant Pumps .
.: a .n-e.
-i - l . ' p c. ' ,
184 M-1.8 Reactor Coolant Pump Motors
' ~ p'jh; ${1, ,
.W ' n$f 185 .M-1 9 .NSS Reactor Coolant Piping _ #
s* p.:m~
. "9 186 M-1.lO USS Pressurizey g;F f *%e ;; &t
- f 187 M-1.11. NSS Pressurizer Spray, Etc. .
, $$$j.h:J n;qV6.;
188 M-1.12 NSS Steam Cencreter, Etc.
~ f 'N.w.t.u-6G z t,'.
189 M-1.13 nSS Letdown Coolers '
. ' x@,.y.' .f
; . x. . r.
190 M-1.14 NSS Seal Return Coolers . , .'+-A s t ,,.0
- w. s 191 M-1.16 NSS Make Up Pumps e '
y 192 M-1.17 *NSS Decay. Heat Removal Pumps , 193 M-l'.18 NSS Decay Heat Coolers . 194 M-1.19 NSS Core Flooding Tanka ,-' 195 M-1.20 NSS Demineralizers 4 196 M-1.21 NSS llters _ 597- ' -M-1.22 .NSS Miscellaneous Tank ,
- 198 M-1.24- --NSS Centrolled Volume Pumps I'
199 -M-1.26 'NSS Turbine Bypars Systcm ' 200- .M-1.27 'NSS Remote Operated Inc
~
201 M-1.28 'NSS Valve 0perators-l m s , A' m y_\ i ,
~ , n"y ; j']. ,
4 2- 3 _ t - - 1r-g
.: :. m . e .g .~. - w - - =- .
7. n
".- .r> . p; . ,, : hM. ~ ,-q:;
.h .::m Q, :+
, _ 1, .
s _ ,3;&3;,
- O n_: ? .e*
/
; gg _ : ;;
A) 202. .M-1.29 * .NSS Fuel Handling Dridges ..< -f'~M'. - -..q., t. J 203 .M-1.30 HSS Fuel Transfer Mechanism . . Ja'c:
^ n_ . ;.yy m
4 t.. 204 M-1.31 ~ NSS Nuclear, Etc. yt ;'.
. m: m-w2 ,
205 .M-1.32 NSS Safcguards System , _ . m., -J a.yh 4r w s 206' M-1.33 NSS Integrated Control System "l'O:.%;:;: Ag
'..m. y 207- M-1.35 NSS Process Instrumentation, Etc. (2 folders) ' Mr..
3
- 208 LM-1.36 NSS - Reactor Coolant System ~ Nwew+x /'
.<. . Lp_; '
209 M-1.39 NSS - Decay Heat Removal System
^ %:gr l -MW 210 M-1.41 NSS - Chemical Addition System '
*$$$ 4
, ,Y.;#~ ..
kmN 211 M-1.42 NSS - Control Panel ~ ~ w-:Ed ,
, -/! I,, .'
212. .M-1.44 NSS - Miscellaneous Fuel Handling Equipment 4lp;y[f"
- n ;s, o y am,.;
(Z 213 M-1.48 NSS - H.P. Safety Injection Pumps ,
, p:
214 M-1.74. NSS - Reactor Building Iodine, Etc. - ' ' g-@@[p
-<w> w. w y
-g 215 M-2. Nuclear Fuel . ,
h
.216 M-4A MainCondenserUnit1/CondenserPumpsUnit1&2' 217 M-4B Main Condenser Unit 2 - T E, y :. +
.g% 7, -
218 -M-5 Closed Feedwater Heaters, Etc. ,; ' my ;9 219 ;M-6 Deaerating Feedwater Heaters , u,e 220 M-10 Condensate Demineralizers ' M: y 221 M-12 Condenser Tubing , n. 222 M-14 Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps %
.,223 .M Miscellaneous Carben Steel Tanks -
s
~ 224 'M-40 Unlabeled - J .~ V
~
- Contains material relating to the condensate pumps' and 1 Beeb' el inspection reports regarding condensate pumps. l 225 ~ M-51 'Compon.at Coeling Heat Exchangers . . ,
226 1 M-52 ' Component Cooling Pumps x :
-227 :M-54 Containment Spray Pumps ^M. '~
, m .:
A ls ._,
. e.w
_ _ _ - - - - -u_- -ee-e %
.; w, *5*='Esc !
~
9
1-d' :
26
, ~ ;Q.
. as
.= ,
228. M-56 Unlabeled .
;p
'Contains material relating to chilled water pumps.
^fs.
229 M-64~ Misec11ancous nuclear Tanks - [_ 230 ~ M-67 ' - Stainless Steel Sump Pump , 231 -M-91 Turbine Building Crc.ne .eg 232 M-92 Reactor Building Crane . E.j Auxiliary Building Crane 233 M-93 ---
. - g7 b^; -
234 M-101 Atmos. Radwaste Drain Piping ; s
*' ] q9.
235 M-102 Shop Fab Embed Stainless, Etc. , _ C[. ,.:g C*D*
~
Shop Fabricated nuclear Piping - 236- M-104A
;py '
237 M-104B Shop Fabricated Conventional Steam & Service Piping 7 . 9,
-,9.i,_,
238 M-105 Shop Fabricate,d Ltbeded Stainless Steel _ ,,p 239 M-106 Pipe Hangers - Nuclear and conventional -Q- 1x 240 M-109 AtmosphericRadwasteDRPipeA/BandR/B [[
, f ', ,,
241 M-110 Pipe Penetration .
%~
Ja 242 M-116 valves - #600 Carbon Steel, Etc. (3 folders) 7 ,* 3 243 ~M-ll8 Nuclear Service Carbon Steel valves g 244 M-119 valves - 150-400# Carbon Steel Non-Nuclear _ 245 M-120 Unlabeled Contains docu=ents relating to carbon steel nuclear ' [~ valves,2-1/2inchandlarger. - 246 M-123 valves - 600# Stainless, Etc. 247 M-125 valves - Carbon Steel Non-Nuclear .- h!48 M-2Ol Shop Fabricated Piping fer Nuclear Services 249 M-204 Field Fabrication & Installation cf Piping & Instrumentation for Nuclear Servi s
-250 M-205 Field Fabrication & Installation of Conventional -
Steam & Service Piping & Instrumentation . . 4 251 M-209 Pipe Hangers, Supports & Restraints s 252i 'M-221 ' Stain 1cssSteelValves-2-1/P.InchandLarger '
-y d*
w .
,,2
+
- t' ,y E _
w- _ - - g-. - _ - ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 . -. -- z,g'y =. .
.,cnM1 W
. v -
, y '
pqgy W.d 4 1
~
27 , ;
.r,_ <
s _.
+
' -~
h 253' P-103 Shop ' Fabricated Embed Carbon Steel Pipe ' . idk ?
-d. .S.. .
P-104 Shop Fabricated Etelcar & Conventional Pipe ' 'm ( y, 254 - ws e {>7N. , 255- P-105 . Specification - Tet >orary i f -
~
256' P-109 Atmos. Radwaste DR Pipe A/B Etc.
- 3 , ;a
..gy tp ~
257- 'P-ll8 Valves - 600 Carbon Steel Etc. N 1/>d , m:k
- r..
258 P-125 Valves - 150-400# Carbon Etc.- . 1 259 P-133 Butterfly Valves Non-Kuclear . . .gq- : 260 'Chron File w Ecchtel to Consumers Power Company 'j%" < 3/6/70thru9/22/72
- W+,. ;
261 Chron File - Bechtel to Consumers Power Company MDD - 9/25/72thru7/30/73 j' Q:;MlQ fiff 5.c,d . 262 Chron File - Bechtel to Consumers Power Company i 7/30/73thru12/31/73 u o;f li
.; my ,
263 Chron File - Bechtel to Consumers Power Company s .- , 1/1/74- . cf !<'
, sw;.b 264' Bechtel to MW 1-125 .
f An .~._
~ y 265. Bechtel to BW 126-390 ~
'n
<sy .
266 Bechtel to BW 391- ,.n-- . 267 Serial File - 1972, Documents 1-378 268 Serial File - 1973, Documents 1-385 . c1 269 Serial File - 1973, Documents 386-773 , 270 Serial File - 1974, January thru March . 271 Serial Fi' e - 1974, April thru June Serial File - 1974, July thru September 272 ; 1273 Serial File - 1974, October thru December : 274 = MW to Consum<tra Power Company 1-155 l l 275 B W to Consumers Pouer Company 156-275 . , , 276 BW to ('onsumers Power Company 276-480
~
277 MW to Consumers Power Comnany 481- , y,
<m j
\ > $~- t
~
~ U "~ ,,
a- -'ca
' f _sz.u, ,
..y;2- .+ .
1
^
3 ,
=
n
- ~; :;
>^
^
, . b ;-
;< 1 .
_~~
,- ;28 #
p:
- a. - ?. \
-' 278 - y B&W to Bechtel 1-115 -
}.f '
279 'B&W to Bechtel 116-299 q ' 280 B&W to Ecchtcl 300-399 - 281 B&W to Bechtel 400-660 b
. v ..
282
~
B&W to Bechtel 661-
. "w [[J4;b ,
as^
.~ ?
283 TCCooke - Letters 1-300 ~ . : ; w,".
*;~
284 TCCooke --Letters 301- l_
,, 4 Q 285 Chron File 1968 - JFHelle; CQHills; WEKessler; KRKline;. g and Miscellaneous ,
,q ,
w J 286 Midland Chron File 19C8 - Outside Correspondence f:j.g_.- grid .
- ojd%_ ;
287 .Chron File 1969, WEKesr.ler < f.m:w.J.
,: As 288 Chron File 1969, KRKline p
-.w- .
289 Chron File 196, Miscellaneous {d . % 290 Chron File 1970, MPHanson .
.Yfd. 1
~
flygan 291 Chron File 1970, WZKessler -Q}, , '.! us 292 Chron File 1970, KRKline -*
-i '
^..
293' NGPaige Correspondence 1970 .- 294 General - Miscellaneous - Correspondence (Extra Copies - '
- BHPeck) Dated 7-30 thru 10-6-70 _
295-
.Chron File 1971, MPHanson ,. j 3 296 Chron File 1971, 1972, WEKessler 3 297 Chron File 1971, KRKline 298 Miscellaneous 1971, EHPeck J.
MIDLMiD QUALITY ASEURMICE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (Midland Project). J-1~ 'Bechtel File Index ListinCs
=2 Midland Follow-Up Log'(A-1 thru A-34) 3 C2- Post Tensioning Systems Mid.
y ,e a . .: < ! jA?;
y_- =-- - ,- -- .- , -_- - _ x <m 1 g ;..ya 7 ,, : ,. b f",C N'$
.c e:. :s j
.' . 3 n 29
. , o h ! g'? :1 E '
jg ;
-g- ,C 4 J NU
#CA, JAnchor Heads & Bushings _
1 g[ Y I m 5 C Cooling Pond Hydraulic Model L 'y D[i .
~
6 C-8 Field Testing Services . 'bf;M i a:s :, n, 7 C-10 . Earthwork for Plant Site, Etc. . tM3m
- .s.
8 C-15 ' Railroad Bridge ., "<%i l& 9- C-12 Trackwork R.R. Spur ' y j /g,
. 4# %
' 10 C-23 Pipe, Circulating Water _ 4gp w wiwm
- 11. C-24 Sluice Gates Intake & Discharge Structure MlkM
~
[.[ h hlp 12 C-30 - Concrete, Furnish & Deliver - I * ~gME h. iG m au
' ,i,A SAX.s 13 C-31 Concrete Placement
~
, f36
*. cvc y.g b.
- 14. C-32 Wate'stoP r .
*.snimv 6..
- j. %gu
'm 15 C-33 Miscellaneous Metal Work -
;W. ten y .piga 16 C-34 Structural Steel Auxiliary Building <
jQW d
. . M .,%
17 C-46 Fuel Transfer Tube > 1 ' ; :a D.:rg, .M 18 C-43 Stainless Steel Liner Platie , I 19 C-39 Reinforcing Steel
. a
[ , 20 .C-36B . Aux. Bldg. & Tubing Bldg. St. Steel 21 C-36A Inspection Report Structural Steel _ ., 22 C-50A R. B. Liner Ats. & Regn's. & PO's .
'[ ..
23 .C-50A Bechtel Insp. . Reports & Correspondence 24 C-50A-a. Wall Penetration Assemblies
'i
'25 C-50A. Reactor Building Liner
.26: C-Sos: Personnel & Emer. Locks & Equip. Locks [ l
-27 C-51 Steel Pipe Embed =ent Sleeves l 1
. .:_ \
28' C-55 "adweld Rebar Splices . l
.s.
29 LE Main Transformer - 8 < ORj%.
..p.~ ,
- 4f S M.y <
-ww ',
$m~. ,QA} *l
.,c. ; g. - - #1 %
- v i
' N ' '; -
- ffi g
~
. \ > % <x,3-n +:gg;. .
. J a ll;%~.
~*
[- _ n;? $. y* -
, 30 ' se
.. . . :p.z. -s <, x s . . c.
; , jj
^ '
. . ' . , is -
Station Power Transformers
~
.30 'E-2 -- : ,%,w~M.,
~
[. 31 E-4 . Start-Up Transformers V , J.y.-. . x . :e
. x m%
32 E-5 ..6900 Switchgcar, . 4160 & 2400 V
. n.:
2 46 i.r ;. , 33 E-6 Load Center 480 V ' i #
- ~ ,; , , -
- 34 E-7 .480 Volt Motor Control Centers _ ['bOlN[ yt ~
s . .H . '
. 35 E-10 Motors- - - wf, 36 .E-21 Power Cable, 3 4 5 KV
.%Q
. ; J: 4 f.
. ;a f.#
;' '[$,
600,V Insulated Power & Control Cable
- 37 E-22 ,n
'.t' _*-W
,5 :
S. 41,g ?++i 4160 Volt Neutral Grounding Equipment . CY 38 E-25 , 7,cgg;T :q.g 39 E-32 Grounding raterial - Wire & Rods ,S'iih 3 ' js 40 G-1 thru h - WA G-7 Quality Assurance File
,e
] N4
."%[sc.ik ia:ll?*.
41- G-M thru ,
. G-2A Quality Assurance File ,
?
5 cc!nT -le
# .r
&, 4 42 J-201- Control Panel & Field Mounted Instruments
.~,bf-w ;+Offy$
43 J-211 & '.? :
-J-212 Radiation Monitoring Equip. & Personnel Monitors M%E ;
44 J-216 & . .~ J-217 Level Controllers & Temperature Re5ulators . . ne,. ..
- y l 45 J-225 & .
J-226 &
.J-227 Sight Flow Glasses, Level Switches, Gage Glasses :^
- 46 3-228, > .
7-229 & . J-230 Pressure and Temp. Switches, TC's 'RTD's and Thermo Wells, Dial Thermometers ,, J-254,.
. -- 47 ,
- 4
~J-255 &
-J-256 Bleeder Trip Valves, Control Valves, Solenoid Valves e
. 48 M-V12- Review Notices .a 49.. M-4 Condenser 150 - M-5 AC(A) Closed FW IIcater _& Drain ' Coolers ,
.51-w
. M-6 AC(A)DL eserating Fecdwater IIccters
.n ;n ,
,.a
[( a l I
'L'
- t
;f . ,
' k ;, 9
, );j a
't
<- 's _
~
.. m - --
,- 6. g%yp,y g5pd
* ~ +
,3.
~
, x zig
. . .c .
131
' " G._:F -
rgc, t, m Condensate Domineralizers'
." q T 52 M-lO , , .
qa . . . , - '
'M-14 Gen. Auxiliary Fee'dwater Pumps , j' N-53 ,
c,_
. Reactor Bldg. Spray Pumps 54 M-54 :n ,cm, e
.t-55 M-72 & 's Pressurizer quench Tank, Containment Spray Nczzles-M-73
+f .'. '
. . . , ,w J'
Iodine Removal System TQ ,? - 56 M-74 , 57 M-91 Turbine Building Crane [.~ . u. g -g , 58 .M-92-AC Reactor Building Crane y w;,; a 59 M-93 TAuxiliari Building Crane _; - $5hk; c,a - - 60 M-101~ Stainless Steel Piping Embeded -
-ffy$."
s :h[.-; d c? N.?B < 61 M-101 & . M-102 Embeded Stainle'ss Stesl Piping & Embeded Carbon Steel Piping ~ 62 M-103 & Shop Fabricated Stain 1 css Steel Pipe & Fangers, Shop [,[p. ., , M-104 Fabricated Cbn. Steel Pipe & Hangers ,413;A a.,.-
- 7. m,; . , , -
63 M-106 . Mcchanical Joint Cast Iron Pipe & Fittin;;s ce . . m 64 .M-110/1' Flued Head Fittings N7 , vg Pp[p 65 P-104 Shop Fabricated C.S. & S. S. Piping ; y
-4 Field Fabricated Installation and Piping and Instrumentation, 66, P-105-P-109 Pipe Hangers and Supports, Saran Lined Pipe Fittings and Shop Fabricated Drain Piping Auxiliary and Reactor Building
~
67 P-110 R. B. Penetration Flued HDS - . 68 P-116 900#&60c#CarbonSteelValvesHighPressure2-1/2" ,
& Larger 69 P-ll8 C.S. Valves 2-1/2"&Over600&Over _
~.70 P-119 Non-Nuclear C.S. Valves 150-400# Rating 2-1/2"& Larger _
+. .
71 P-123 Nuclear S.S., Gate, Globe & Check Valves, 600# ANSI '
& Higher 2-1/2" Size & Larger 72 P-125 Nuclear S.S. Valves 150-400# Rating 2-1/2"& Larger 73 P-133 Non-Nuclear CI a CS Eutterfly Valves File Index
~
74 . .M-1.0: l s}. g~ '
' * * ; & p. [-l
- e . :'- &
.. :',y
- a
%c
,, '::'f
, 1 7 -l -
~
73 :...-e.
'32 ,
. ~ 2'W- -
r . e- / 75 * ~ BW Expediting Inspection Sched. (Vendor Audit Sched.) N Midland u. , l u, 76 M-1.0 ' Midland Plant - General '
.; y
' }l 4 .
=77 M-1.1 Reactor Vessell 7,.
.w .y 781 M-1.2 Midland Plant Reactor Vessel Internals a s s
.79 M-116 ~ Steam cenerator 80 M-1.7 Midland Plant Reactor Coolant Pumps .
,A
.- - Jni:
81 M-1.8 Midland Plant Reactor Coolant Pump Motors C?/$
.e IEM' 82 M-1 9 Midland Plant Reactor Coolant Piping ' f f /JJ;
,, m y:t 83 ~ M-1.10 Midland Plant Pressuriter . ;;; @
9': gig 4
- 84 M-1.11 Midland Plant Pressurizer Safety & Relief Valves -
7 " .~.
,3 85 M-1.12 Midland Plant Steam Generator Safety Valves g j @ !'
e ,) - 86 M-1.13. Midland Plant Letdown Coolers ; 7E#
%. -- i .
87 M-1.14 Midland Plant Seal Return Coolers ' gj;d$2l 88 M-1.16 Midland Plant Makeup Pumps ' [[
. (:rn 89 M-1.17 Midland Plant Decay Heat Removal Pumps . ., ..
90- M-1.19 Midland Plant Core Cooling Tanks /c. 91 M-1.19 . Specification for Core Cooling Tanks . 92 M-l'.20 Midland Plant Demineralizers . 93 M-1.27 & , M-1.28 Midland Plant Remote Operated Valves 94- M-1.29 & - . M-1.30 Midland Plant Fuel Handling Bridges
. N 95 M-1.31 Midland Plant Nuclear InsErumentation & Reactor ,
'};
. Protection Systen. ,
)
C 96 M-1.32 Midland Plant Safeguard Actuation System (ECCAS)
- 97 M-1.33 Midland Plant Integrated Control System .- .
;98 ;M- l.35 - Midland Plant Process Instrumentation (General) ,
99 M-1 36- . Midland Plant Benctor Coolant Tnstrumentation ~ < ~ mMi_
I W h 4;k,;;'aNQ&
~
c e w.
., p. - , -
~ WJ1[{
'f- *' # ,
'_ , 3
-l m .
.c . 7, ..t
.P
- ~e, e '9, 1 g3a .
. ,= s ;33~ ,i;-' E'(wyW
- s , " spg
~
v.,; , n: pg '
. .^. 2; . j ,y 100. .~ M-1.38 i Midland Plant !?akeup & Purification Instrumentation- , 0; j;g.jy
- ~
.m w: pg
- p. 6%
~
101 -M-1.42 - Midland Plant Coritrol Panel '
.. et 102 M-1.43 Midland Plant HSS. Computer SQf%g
. . %l 103' M-1.44 Midland Plant Miscellaneous Fuel Handling Equipment 1 ?:0
.l N Wj Midland Plant Fuel
~
104 M-2.0- ~
!N$0?
105 M-1 9 - USS-12 Field Weld Criteria . - _..n .p; f&-
~ . , .
. 106 'M-1.35 Quality Assurance File (1026,1027,1014,1028,1037, s 1029,1030,1037,1038,.1048) <
g.C4
't . +RL 107 Standards for Specification 1095/1069 For Cleanliness p]y of Nuclear Reactor Systems & Components .
.J
. n. 4x: 9:@n ,
' ' i : 41 7e ,%l 108 Specifications 1152/1069 For Nuclear Quality Program ;
Requirements , .
,L_;p$;!
jgy
' 's . NM 109 Equipment Spceification for Reactor Internals t[$g
,e ,-
110 Addendum No. 1 to Equipment Specifications Reactor. Coolant Pumps for Contract No. 620-0012 & 620-0013 id x s~.h,. , - - d i y/O qmrge K*
;2 ', M, MT
-o-LEGAL PSPARTMENT FILES - '
'Oh-
- ,3 K .1 ATOMIC ENERGY - AEC ,
p
-Regulations: Quality Assurance -
?^
(Dkt. PRM-50-6) ,
']'
2
~*
- ATOMIC ENERGY - AEC ~"'W-
. -Reports: DRO Monthly Inspection Summaries , j@ ,
t = 3 ATOMIC ENERGY - MIDLAUD PLA"2 3
-AEC Compliance Inspections :
4 ATOMIC ENERGY - MIDIAND PLANT
-Quality Assurance J. J
;; y
-5 ATOMIC ENERGY - MIDIAND PLAliI' E(d
-Quality Assurance: Consultants' Reports ":N G 6 ATOMIC ENERGY - MIDIAND PLALT
.-Quality Assurance: Project Procedures Manual ,
7: ATOMIC ENERGY - MIDIAPD PLALT -4 +
-Reactor Construction Permit & Operating License 3. :f Order to Show Cause 5
~
l-Construction Pennit:
~
- ' :j;f
~ l T , W:'?&
- -. ..+ :; , t m. weggg
, wy. . . -.ym . ..,yp
, ~
*e n-..
, :.gyyue::
w .;y n
.g . .. : :') : f,Q +;f *
-34 .
( J 71 > _ e. .,
' .f
. . .,- e s.
% i ANMIC EITERGY - MIDLAliD PLAT:T
'%'m.';f f%7' 8.
-Reactor Construction Pomit & Operating License - *
-Construction Permit: Order to Show Cause, Hearing on
_ py ~
~"-; T.
' ATOMIC E?iERGY - MILW;D PLANT .
9' -Reactor Constracticu Pemit & Operating License N9,
-Construction Pcmit: Order to Show Cause, Hearing cn p
_ w
- (Discovery) m ,a; g <
. . . . ~; g 2
. ,n . :g
-) ATO'.GC EIIERGY - MIDLAND PLA!iT , , V 2R gj-Qf Reactor Construction Pemit & Oper" ting License
-Construction Pemit: Order to Show Cause, Hearing on' '
Wu e m ~ (FileScarch) - chn.;,m . A ' '.?ppe'e '? 11 ATO!GC ENERGY - MIDLAI;D PLAliT
-Reactor Construction Pemit & Operating License hj g
-Construction Permit: Order to Show Cause, Hearing oti ~< p$
'(Prehearing Conference) . . '.SNIW s1
-,ygn
*' J.} Lf.", ;
' j T
- fEl 12' ATOMIC ENERGY - MIDLAND PLANT Reactor Construction Permit & Operating License
-Construction Permit: Order to Show Cause, Hearing on- g @4,;Q (
'M W4
,~.m.
'(RecordDocuments .gpi:Q..
13- ATOICC EUERGY - !GDLAI!D PWIT i hpik:
-Reports to AEC: Quality Assurance g?.< . +. ,
' . ...,$3v
.9 1,,0N;g.
- s
. - ?;.tq;; ,
_g m. y;
, -L== A Relevant docu:mnts contained in any of the above files are g available for inspection at Consumrs corporate headquarters in Jackson, . .,
Michigan. In addition to the above file listing, see response to Interrogatory No. 1. 3 3 9 % l 1
. . ~ . 1 I
a cy h V , , y _ f y ,,
^
s , E . o ._ [~- i tr .
.: w 7,u-'.w%, Q'y
- c.
, ,. . , ,- , , 3 oE y
; ,e ,
}} ** ~n ,;
c.. i j f(l ; n. _;.f E , i 3 v ~,
, ~ '
~
, g-INTERROGATORY 12. List each decision which you .
~
m
~;
have taken or failed to take in connection with quality ~ _qg assurance and' quality control at the Midland facility which r.
.e e action, pr failure to act, was based in any part upon the ' g' s.%
"W
.4'r expenditure of funds. This Interrogatory is intended to solicit your answer as to what role the cost of providing ,
Cu quality assurance and quality control play in the quality .
% a W;;_
assurance and quality. control activities you recommend or ~
.%g 7.m :
_' f, d2; ' implement.
. d.l n..
g l
- s. .
ANSWER: There have been .o decisions relating to i. ed, ~
, y;p the scot 2 of quality assurance program basad solely on cost. ,
y
. _ ww of course, decisions on manning levels and systems utilized . ~ M,lh <
yqi i have a cost aspect and we are not unaware of the costs involved. " '
' M' However, where it has been felt that actions or manpower have _ l' -
been needed to maintain quality, necessary steps have been
- 1 taken on the basis of that need alone. The following are examples of sui::h decisions.
- 1. Quality assurance has been identified as a cost item in construction budgets since 1970, but no actions have bleen taken-to reduce that item. Indeed, budget allotments for quality assurance have been increased. -
..2. In August, 1973 and before the scheduled October 1, 1973 resumption of work in B & W and B & W vendor's shops on, components for-the Midland facility which had been in suspension
< l since_1970, Consumers directed B & W to implement a new quality
.'t<p-i
_ f ', . . [.
.c- .__ .
.. ~,
=- :..
'. , ; .. cly.
o e
~~
L .q~, f ad g'G'y ,
.o 3,;g..; s n.:.;[
~
.. 4 ..
a- ., u n .m ,
-- ~,
, .. .c r m-jg
~
.m.
assurance sp' e c'ification which expanded quality assurance obliga- ' ~]N tions on such components. , _
.< , c-.n%
.. l
.s.. -
-3. The selection of consultants to review and
~.*I W ..
s,
- a W;yz.
w advise on-the Consumers program has not been on basis of . pc..?.".f cost. -
'1?; p3.C-s
. .x ;u '
r
..Lf 5{ j ,
-4. .. a. wy Additional manning and organizational changes ... -'. FC.,
,k1 have been made when needed without budgetary delays or y.. . MM'w 4 ; :- f restr.tctions. ' '
,.::.l$ g&;g}n, Q<
c , ceg; v7y
- .T [(, 'I
.' w.>: q s
The' persons preparing the answer to this interrogatory ;&33 :
' . ~ :. . .jz i Q
are as follows: 4 bT,
~
.Q.;. ;
m ,
< ~t . m Mr. William Kessler
<pSe,;#]M Consumers Power Company -
1945 Parnall Road - Jackson, Michigan 49201 , Q}}M; Michael I. Miller, Esq. *
'l .N Isham, Lincoln & Beale ~
One First National Plaza - Suite 4200 7<
.- 1 Chicago,' Illinois 60670 '
. ('u s >
't . -
"'y y 9
I l
- x
(
. .. ~\
9
. -) *
~,.
- :": +.9 n
": *t
._ ^ fi .
- pn;- pqn 'pg f.
. s
; .,y.
, t uy- )
.. ~ ;,
, y;,-
+,
- INTERROGATORY 14. With respect to the Midland - , .
- e facility quality assurance, state: ,
.. p
- No (a) Do you agree with the allegations set ,.) ;
forth in the.Show Cause order and the ~ referenced documents?' If not, state < wP' ' each allegation with which you do not ' W h' ?: agree and explain why; - ' C -
.(b) As a result of the Show Cause order, I O have'you recommended or taken any action ' ' Q .j to change your role or Consumers role at the Midland facility? If not, state why not, .and if yes, explain such changes in J,3 9 e implementations and recommendations in ng$p detail. * ' 'f WEd
;Q,p
. ~;9 ANSWER: (a) Consumers position with respect to the" g_.
allagation on the Order to Show Cause is set forth in its i Answe.- to Order to show cause, dated December 24, 1973. 'e L :s4 - "
% :-()ya
, 2~
2 (b) No changes in Consumers' role in quality assur-- [,7d ance at the Midland site are directly attributable to the show ~ 'I cause order. The Midland. quality assurance program has been , revised in part as a result of apparent deficiencies in certain q aspects-of the plan as_ described in answer to Interrogatories 4, 6, 12, 25 and 26. When deficiencies in implementation of ~ j the plan are revealed by AEC inspection, consultants' reviews i i _.~ and qu'ality assurance management audits, further changes will I
~
l take place. f l
.The person preparing ,the answer to this interrogatory was the following:
Michael I. Miller, Esq. '
-Isham, Lincoln & Beale '
One First National Plaza ' Suit'3 ' 4 200 ' '
<~
Chicago, Illinois 60670- - 'f*C me.,
_. - r- ..<
.g
, : '. ;gns
.(; h[II+
~ '3
~ , ./ . /[..
IkiTERROGATORY15. Describe in detail cach classi- .,
.fication or category of document- (as defined herein) which 3
-7 you maintain in connection with quality assurance or quality- ' ~5
?
control at each of your facilities. This Interrogatory is , intended to solicit information for a motion to produce and _ _ ,. ,, - AL is intended to have you describe documents whether of a formal.
~ s ..
or informal nature, and whether or not they are documents whichT egy-arenotdisclosedtosomeoneotherthanpersonsinyourCompany.[4 _
,sN@
' ANSWER: The following categories of documents'are "2P
; w n.f9;; , ~
maintained by Consumers Power in connection with Quality Assurance;g 9 . q-or Quality Control at each of the Company's existing or planned- ;9; i nuclear facilities: , c, ,' ,
.; , .9:4 I.. Midland Plant $sn$[; '
..,s m.
A. Manuals -
- 1. CPCo Manuals 1-E a Quality Assurance Manual
- b. Quality Assurance Services Procedures Mant:
- c. Midland PSAR ,
- d. Midland Project Procedures Manual
- e. Electric Plant Projects Policies and ,
Procedures Manual
- + ,
- 2. Bechtel Manuals '
~l
- a. Project Procedures Manual '
- b. Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual
- c. Field Inspection Manual
=d. Quality Control Notices Manual.
. ~,
P'
'_ n -
,- o > " : 2.i i*
y- .. dqm
.. ,f -. -
i c. - u-- s
- . 4 2.y - -
, v.;g gm ,
.. ' j-s4 ~1 g - ef , .,
, , , ,*2, jg ;dg.
... . .. , +. .
~, Q.
-y * ..
-7 , ' ,;Le:dy? , .
.~,,n., ,
~ ~
$NU
, s...
yL a t. v. x - N. g_ vg e.. Quality; Control Manual - ASME Section.III. , f $.1
~ '
4 4
~
- f. Procurement Department Inspection Manual?, ,
~+. I
- - + ,sa
- g. -Project Quality Assurance - Detailed' r .. ' ,' ~.,
~
Audit Plan y , _ w, . . me. 1
- 3. . Babcock & Wilcox Manuals <
m-s . wW w M >'
;[#a
#. { - si. 7 . , b ,g ,. '.-J
' ~
a.- B&W-1212 .
~-
' #acvmM.. ,'
n , , 4;
- b. B&W-1346 '
J P Mg:
~, wm l w.,
- c. ' Nuclear Equipment Quality Assurance.Manualii Cormnercial Nuclear - Barberton Works'_ i A
. a ~:ss ,. g n f, ,
-- d . . Field. Specifications for NSS Componedki.T 2 w n.w;%3 8 $? %
a :y . . 7#;$%M2
.B. Daily Logs f -:-
.,' / ?N &
,aQ
- 1. Daily Audit Surveillance Reports E - M.% S9~w
.w ~gw
~
,V . ff) . . (l'*.*N
,~ fj %., >s p.';;;[if
. .; 1 C. Files - See Co npany's responses to interrogatories .
Nos. 1 and 9. e' J. /, ,* .m ..s W4, a v': ;Q% II. Palisades Plant ~. L , MN
, -' .rymy A. Manuals 'b.S p ,
y.<l
.. , y
- 1. CPCo Manuals < ::1 !l
. . q:is , .
- a. Quality Assurance Services Procedures [ , 4 Manual ..jb,,
,, -s ,
i
- b. Field Quality Assurance Manual -
_a ;
- c. Palisades PSAR
- d. Palisades FSAR We
- s. ..
e.- Electric Plant Projects Policies and , 9 e Procedures Manual r 4 . ,
- f. Start-Up Program Manual
- 2. Bechtel Manuals. ,
- m. .
.y
" ." r s
e 'b c
. J' * .,.=% * * ' .V-
'",. Ng
> s qw3 ;
e
~
4 7;S ,;, W>. ~ ..,.y .U.;_ ** W w -- .
s.< : "
= -
y_ _,
~ ir ' 'p ~ ,
e
- 27:.. ' '9' .,
.- ._ , _ .,; *i.:.:c
, p .1 , y,q }.; _
- e.
, . g. . ; .. - .
M,, Jy6 -.+ , ; .> W %.l:y%.o,: -
. . . - . . +._
m , g.q: .
. ,4.-
'. ..,,w .+ ;;s,n.p .
~
Y.s ; . r . .m
' 3x 4 7.;a. . -v z-,
~ ' ' 9q% .
. - f >
- a. Project Procedures Manual , V!. a dF
* ~
2;p l
- b. Ad'dendum to Project Procedures Manual _;
w
, * -;Q'lt .", ..A
.c. Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual ffPj.
; < ,* > ;%;u
- d. Field Inspection Manual ,
, j} h('
gaw. '"
> 'e .- Quality Control Manual - ASME Manual .. fr Components . . - @ X'l i.
. i2. g,17,t ., w
- f. Procurement Department Inspectior. Manualf' .
..sm.c,e ,
e<
,m_. ' e'qwg se . .r. # +.% .g.
1 .e- - B. Files (See below) j )3.$l@.k u .. . . , . - ,
-, enMyng
~
. v-m
~.e f ,. w. . - ,
III. Big Rock Point Plant * ? , y7 W Mi wA*.;
, 76 :'; T+
~-
"n. v sl.%[f.. .4
.A. Manuals - A ' '_
6l m W;>@a m_ q. u.,fe ~ .
- 1. ~CPCo Manuals . 'tqW n.% 4 i;d rg- p %
- a. Quality Assurance Manual ,
u".Mnn v/,E,, , m
.n. -, \
m 4 .
'b. QualityAssuranceServicesProcedures!%.~s:$:
Manual '
-QMi
- c. Big Fack Point PSAR g%<
g d. Big Rock Point FSAR . ,f.::. ~ T.
- e. Electric Plant Projects Policies and Procedures +< ~ ' , ' ,_
a., L . w-
- 2. NUS Corooration Manuals s W..gi.e .,'
y .
- s. *
- a. i Engineering Assurance Manual Projects Division Quality ?~P ..
v
- 3. Suntac Manuals . , s :- . f;;
- a. -Quality A_ssurance Manual , . afi
~
- b. Catalytic Field Quality Assurance Manual
.y
,-d 1
i.- B.' Files (See below) . ..
. ;y; .
t :
-r :
s
^ , -
v' [, ;.hvg,* f'l,. _s
- ^"
?L
_g~ ' a
'%[,
.~, 'Q a g'j% n
'1
-.i ~ ,
7 s- [ * ;; g.";f j t qq.y
- -c ,, .
, . m .
+
~ '
. .g.g:. .
c_ _ n
~
uc 9
, . * ~ ~ : : .l:...yjiG
- - ,, ; :v;y
. - . r,: , ,
41_ g y%: s.e : m s '. IV. Quanicassee Plant . W' e A. Manuals
, M.;,
p
- 1. CPCo Manuals 't iN
~a. Quality Assurance Manual
- s 2
N
. , 1,7,.
- b. Quality Assurance Services Procedures ..
Manual . %
- c. Quanicassee PSAR 4!
, p= ,,
. d. Quanicassee Project Procedures Manual.
.c
- e. Electric Plant Projects Policies .K)M ;;;
and Procedures Manual . 7 ,n :
. .sm ,
-"~
- 2. Bechtel Manuals '
,M/
v x
- a. Project Procedures Manual .
"U,:33. 2
. g' , ,,
- b. Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual -
ry i, ;.' ' . ,
- c. Field Inspection Manual m a
1[[;g ,-
- l. d. Quality Control ASME Manual i [jg . : .y
- 3. Westinghouse Manuals
- a. Quality Assurance and Reliability PUR ' '
Systems Manual B. Files (See below) _ V. Fermi I Plant - Consumers Power does not maintain any manuals, logs or files in connection with Quality Assurance or Quality control at this facility. Fermi I is owned and operated by the Power Reactor Development Corporation ("PRDC") , to whom all AEC licenses have been issued. Although Consumers Power l contributed capital to the construction of the
-facility and also has an officer on the Board of l- .
7,
' ,I 'a < [X ,78
'Oy
y .
, ;[$
- g+, pmmh,n.:ph 4 : y .y. m- )ia. G. ' M,G * : a n-
- , "^
.v g
..M ial-Q, QL,b D' gs .
. #~
~t
, e:- . - - '
it. y
- M fy gia a,
42 , '
,P
.:' Q . Ol '
RDC, it has h , .,
~}
. construction ad no dir w f , 1,s or ,
,q operationect role in'eith. :n
~i
'f a.
.ConsuControlachat:eDocuments of relating to Qu li of the facility er the
'M mers a .W s-
~!-
a the Company' ty Assurance p e%y.
.c
' the followin. man gement attitud es s facilities ig? s c
g- spe ifica lly tg files . Those fileson.are' violations g Company's ould re .yc, . fle t respo - o the Midland
; the v Plant hav which e be contain d contai = ins ge+
arious . projectsnses to Interr ocuments
- rela, tin <
system,: all do not ogatories Noser, identified docu
. leand 9..- .in thegM&.
Quality As ments share a . ind $s.; ; suranceand maintained K?,ile.. Big Rock comnon fileexing -
. ;.yd8~
character Point and Quanic Quality Controlby the in Company y 'p1 *.' % y' d
~^
and ar asse ma tters ,m theconnection at for the Midlae filed in a e Plants are of the Palisade .x w nd Plant. manner s. , y f
~ Additional comparable to thsame,gene cn Q, Files 'of at ill
$[,
A. H. A - ustrated, Palisades At ond: e Quanicass omic Eengy Pla
~'( ,
nt Big Rock ee Plan t [g # A k s f Additional Point - Nucle ' 1_ $,... 7 Files of ar Plan t
. t p i.1%
3 L Big Ro c k Point'J.tt:A. McDivi " p.. Palisades- Law Suits N
. .~
Addi tion l es'~ofFil a ay:i
>s .
e R. C. 4
.y u
Palisades I Youn dahl: nspec tions . g. n.
- pwe t.
y :q .y' M7
" ?i' m ',.
~ ;
ja , 31 e
*- * ' y%se
- y *ye J
' ' cQ;G7blTk d
a y l/
.x yw*
- rear
**M 9
mi- e 7.q s'
.}$hY
. , & g- pcM 3
,,; w 42
\- x ,,w; .y;
= .,,
,y'.;m ::p ;yn.w. , . /., 3 --
( - %. ,-s .'w4
; '- w
=-
% ~
+ . .v .w
, a ;g*, s t)
" . , . s * ,t, 2
.-43-~ ,
# - ) b. D
^*
,. .Q' {l4 . *
. ' l:
- Palisades . .;a ;;; % .
' General -
wt/
- Palisades - Wuality Assurance Program ' .i,.W/ ' gi' g
~
f . . :'2 /= ., :
- Palisades - Review Meetings ,
M .* q; , .
.M, , .,.
- Palisades - Startup Program
' . T, . , ,vrs..,e.
s .
...,'..s. s l. " U,.e
-* Palisades - Visits to Plant <
, N. . , W, f Em?'W r k s < -pi
- Palisades - Safety Analysis R'eport ~ , .'
n P.. . . wyW'
,. .J% m.;:. t.- %
4
*AEC - Meetings With (General), - Palisades m
. v U..Myu.uw N! M Quanicassee - Licensing ' ' -+
- .Q Q3
-wM14)p% g;s Quanicassee - Miscellaneous 3 j'. M I+ Y U M f'.
.. 4% m m-e. ..w
, X:@ Tf6fl%$
Big Rock Point - Abnormal Occurrences ,
;y, : , es w .
Big Rock Point - AEC Inspections '
' M .7Sf%u n k :: gem. c y
- m. . -g Big Rock Point - Miscellaneous 1. *, M. v W m.
'< - Ur,iQfM Big Rock Point'- Quality Assurance '
DMM1D
- ^iz;c aw::m; m
. .. x. ,% ce ,pc
- - . m.j m ~ . w +.,,,
Additional Files of S. H. Howell:
> J N-OW - ..
. f %mQ Palisades - AEC .
3:JO,;b -
,4,
,; ; /
Palisades - General -
'T7 , wl v
a- 74m.:.s Palisades - Post Project Review -
. . Ew#.,;m"
.s J; Palisades - Current Quality Assurance Meeting j,'[;c..
1
~ Palisades - Quality Assurance 2:/ .
y 34 Palisades - Startup ..%.~ :"
"p, .
Palisades - Audit - Bechtel Field (by CPCo) Mxm~
% 43 Palisades -1 Audit - CPCo 5tartup Program (by CPCo) , [[;
.2 ,
Quality Assurance - Audit QAI by CPCo l
--. N. #
s l .. ,3g~ l , , .
- R. D. Allen's files now in the-possession of_R. .
C. YoungdahI.'_ .
- p. m.
l
- q 2 b' .f-l 1
.s. m_
g er. ,
*\g. * '.-+;' T. ;& eg }
- ,Q@ gj
_- .m y
; ,' , a4 ,
%. 4 e -
s y ., Ja Jm 9, , , gp
, ,.- _y y. -
~
, 3 < '
- < .+ ,
s e sae
~
- 7. . f
. _4 4_. ,
, 5:
'1 s Quanicassee --AEC ,
.s{ , ,
LQuanicassee - Aud'its & Inspection Reports ,
.y r ,
]q],
.Quanicassee - AEC Letters to S. H. Howell '
;f Quanicassee - General *
*J '
m Quanicassee - Current Quality Assurance Meeting.. [N .. Quanicassee - Quality Assurance
,-f([
's ;5p ';.Y ,
Additional Files of R. A. Lamley: <c,'R o
- w:g; Quality Assurance (Operating) Section 4 - 12/28/73 g4 gr Quality Assurance - Operating Power Reactors (Meeting .
.in Chicago 11/26/73) ,, ,
y lh,1 _.,;4 5, Quality Assurance - Generhl ?' 1 y Palisades - Abnormal Occurrences - Reports to AEC dQ:
, er iw Palisades - Exit Interviews ,
, Dgj
- .s .
Palisades - AEC Reactor Construction Permit & License c ; [* ' ~ Petition for Enforcement Hearing - M. Cherry,. , a ; Palisades - Allegations Abnormal & Unusual Events
--4w., l Palisades - Audit I
. l Palisades - Citations - AEC b;
.e Palisades --Management Review E
' \
i Palisades - Miscellaneous +
~l Palisades - Plant Review Committee Minutes Palisades - Quality Assurance Program ,
Palisades - Unusual Events - Reports to AEC > :; Palisades - Work .Prcq..:ess - Steam Generator Reactor Vesse$ Bigk, Rock Point - Abnormal Occurrences - Reports to AEC Big ' Rock Point - Allegations Abnormal & Unusual Eventis -
, .nz
. ~ . , ,
V l p ' "[ .b . . a,
' , +< , l?2 % i
- 'i ej
mm,
' ,ys v4 ]
s ,~ --
>[Ij i-
- ,- x n 'l[, 3.,,.
! D
,a .w
- ' ' 'f o y ,
., ; ^3.- : +; !?y
. Big Rock Point - Aud! f- ' '
~_;;;f
. w Big Rock Point - Citations - AEC ,s -
"~
~
s Big Rock Point - Management Review
' 'ik c,s -/
*f . .
' Big Rock Point - Miscellaneous '
Big Rock Point - Plent Review Committee Minutes ~ ]w[,g[y N
. '~, ,
' Big Rock Point - Unusual Events - Reports to AEC
[ff y Chron File N f)?h :.
- m. , s ,
, .e.%
-* Nuclear - Miscellaneous Correspondence - 1972-1973 . g,l ',## r.. i
- Nuclear - Big Rock Point mM? \
- 4 ','..?. vga -
1 n Vorg]
- Nuclear - liidland ~~
'Lp
' ,., 7fiM
, ~ , ,
.. , . - sy .r
- Nuclear - Palisades Miscellaneous Correspondence
~
,[_; kj ' -
~
.a
- Nuclear - Quanicassee Miscellaneous Correspondence 4
w
;g...c.,
~
, f f 7 * ( ' * ;; .
Additional Files of A. V. Hume: - .ND~ w.w Big Rock Point Plant 7 L f r/ : 7:
, v. t Midland Plant .
Palisades Plant -
. . J_ ,
Quanicassee Nuclear Plant ~
.[ ~
_ Quality Assurance Manual for Nuclear Plants > s Quality Assurance Audit Costs <; The persons preparing the answers to this interrogatory are as follows: ,,
.Mr. Harvey W. . Slager_ -
Consumers Power Company .^ 1945 Parnall Road - Jackson, Michigan 49201
~*
H. R. Wall's files now in the possession of R. A. Lamley.
.V t
w b.
~
+ h -
*l
~ --
, - ,.:' ,,' ' MgO: e i
. 3 V-[.Q]
- -- y.- . . .. y
- .% .- g ;; g
.. . . . c
-s r, m{.p% -b g_. .- ww, _'o.s- 3,p ,v i e ~ s
- w. . .
. , , ;t-v u..,n: q-
, ;. , j'.7 ys;p; 2
* , , .. w~
Mx ~:e; h.
-e a -;
s , w, ..
+
.s.c
- r Paul W. Koval, Esq. *
~
Consumers Power Company M'!M_
- 212 West Michigan - q. ' ' -
Jackson, Michigan 49201 L ?, Ml' , ..
. . ns-w R.' Rex Renfrow III, Esq. ' ~
, j h [, '
Isham, Lincoln & Beale One First National Plaza - M. WJ , Y ..
.d.
~W
. Suite'4200 .
. Chicago, Illinois 60670 . _ w ' 4,)m@. .
'_ . s,-,s.
":p ;
s' 4Sa n: -
*j[ I r
e4&s . ,%9_
^J e1f' Q (
, 'l; lb. ?
,' -'go. '**%,
.nlll%&$kf}
g"< s-Yy".'. n,,
, :' t;;*)
- 9 ;;7 ., :.*.J +
,, w '
f3 y< r- { O. y lp* * " ' ' -
- f. Y
,e *-***'
s:- if. s
. n - um. :,
O ? {,.. /*477
- J + 's' .>
I' P *
. c = >+-
.n s
~^
#e r.t . .~' Ida
_L , , * ' *y y . . . .-l~f.N - vi *'y
' ,W.k-
tw"~ a ,c _f M -
' + . , g f f s. l}
k ' *A. .%k= ,
- R%; -
+ x 2 3. %, * -
=--
^- - - .v. 4 7Je?.t.
s'A??*r9#p y 44h[ r 2
-. Q +
~ vy '%:
9
- e
- r~.+
3'. -.f'3, .a
-e 6 4 y f 9 -b
, s'm . . . .
-..r 4
+
Ob%
^,A e >
I i y
,. ~ r
' A j. N
, :m, 1 i
.'"{
.J c.
e. W -*g-
, m +
l 1
't e
1 s
- T 1
'e'9 7 t
( yl . b s. s' *
-_ ^ % ,, t 7., " y; r" x_ l y , e , -w~ , -----.,y , t
.~ ;~ . . -
r , _gx g, ;,. ,.
' ~ ,
-' ~
'" ~
M. ,,m cl, %, - g ,,':s+ e , 8E'/1: - .
-l> [.w g
.Qu ,
INTERROGATORY-16. Please list the name and address '
~
, 4 q
- of-each witness whose testimony you intend to offer at the pro- -
,1) ceeding. Include with your answer a summary of the scope of each. . bis 9 ,
a witness's testimony. . In the event that you do not presently j@IM
~
know who your witnesses will be, please list the areas of '
. #[,
; .p evidence or testimony which you presently believe you will in- [
., y,;
troduce. If you cannot answer this Interrogatory, please ex- ;,]p , 8, 29 -:. plain in detail why you cannot, m
;fnj9h ,._p .
y-
' ~, '. . d - Q3j.;
Q;-;f?g ANSWER: Consumers Power Company has not yet finally w.m, ,a
+Ll 1 determined all the witnesses it will present in the instant pro- . Q; ) ~
wn:q ceeding.- At the present time, Consumers intends to present testimonyj{ 3:3-
-VMs%i I in the following general areas:
, h;cm m . ~ e,w->
(a)' The evolution of 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix B; f !.yi M,,
'Y
,c.
(b) A description of the Quality Assurance and db :;. :-x, quality control functions of Consumers Power Co., , -.' A Bechtel and B&W and how these functions interface;
-]o (c) An analysis of AEC inspection reports, violations, -
x, , non-conformance reports, and quality assurance audit ~-
'. : w.
findings relating to Midland; - *1 . - i
.(d) An analysis of Consumers Power Companys con- % '
sultant's . recommendations and- the implementation _
.gi by Consumers of these recommendations; ,- b 4
.c (e) Commitments to continually upgrade the Quality Assurance Program by training sessior 2, management 7,e involvement and third party audits of Consumers Power .m. ?. ,
Co~.- - Quality Assurance Program.- . ,
^
- w:
s f ,N v. g -
>y;Q&
. 2 '
, ycg
cv . y ,
.3
* :af
., : ver;
< qi; <
x. s ., o a 2 ) :' sf gg ~
,j::' .
A ' .+ It is presently anticipated that at least Steven H. ~ ~[ I Howell and Gilbert S. Keeley will tes'tify regarding at least , i n l-
+ ,
- t one of the above subject matters. The person preparing the
~
[" , answer .to this interrogatory was as follows: '[f[
. .,.,,y .y>., -
t
.R. Rex Renfrow III, Esq. - ' -e"
'Isham, Lincoln & Beale -.
One First National Plaza .,..
'N Suite 4200 % ' M Chicago, Illinois 60670 f.'74lm, ,:-
9
-w,','3d+ e 4
, , N .' .q%Q
,SE un y
.-14',
R ,-j ; "."LiI
' ~
^!' .; . I-i
- a c?s :
, eg*, ,
2: ; %' A.1
;~ ,m
+(}If l-
<*-e> ,)::
b'.
.,,q-..,
*4
+ ]%'.'*'s 4 . l.
- l t
, a r ,,49
. h*
I's - , i W
/
4
, 1 l
o a
. 'e
~ ^ f I
~
. i- +
=. g g O4.. a
^
T %f 6
~
- 1~ .
J- > ,.q, .539
-. ~w
,, l w:J K ^a
.' O .'l ,
. .. l ;i. .
~
.. m ,
- \
49- ~ I l l i INTERROGATORY 17. Please list all of the docu- ~ mentary evidence which you presently plan to introduce at the
^
s proceeding. If you are not in a position to presently state what documentary evidence you will introduce, please state ,
,y" '
,~u '
what categories of documentary evidence you will introduce. , L t If you are not in a position to answer this Interrogatory, please . +,,:3 ; explain why not. *
~ 1- ,
1
~ ~-
ANSWER: -l. ' l Consumers Power Company has not yet deter-
,o ;- l J, ;
mined the specific documents it intends.to offer in the instant
',7 7;} ,
.c 11 proceeding. At the present time, Consumers does intend to 'I-c.
offer portions of the documents in the files set forth in its #"' answer to Interrogatory Number 1. In addition, documentation '
'i of the activities set forth in Interrogatory answers 4, 5, 6, 7, -;
;?"
25 and 26 will be offered. -6'
. w'.
The person preparing the answer to this interrogatory ' was as follows: . R. Rex. Renfrow III, Esq. .c. i Isham, Lincoln & Beale One First National Plaza Suite 4200
+
Chicago, Illinois 60670 9-Y e g ij" n
; 't ' _
-Mi
.s ,cs y
^ , f. ; MI' Y
\' ' ?$0l ,
.. N e '
'O i ,
^
INTERROGATORY 18. Do you believe that Quality - Assurance and Quality Control at the Midland facility should be
- l _
controlled or reviewed by an-organization independent from .
'k Consumers Power Company, Bechtel or the Atomic Energy Commission.
, ]
~
If not, state why not in light of the historical problems which . Consumers Power Company and Bechtel have"had at Midland and ' p Palisades and the fact that the Atomic Energy Commission can [T , only inspect 1-2% of construction activity at any given nuclear ,
,31 j(
facility. ' j.jjjj :, .
% ,19 ANSWER: Consumers Power Company does not believe =
that either the Quality Assurance Program or the Quality Control' [ c-activities at the Midland facility should be controlled by an s -:. organization independent from Consumers Power Company, Bechtel " or the Atomic Energy' Commission. Insofar as the Quality _
.?
Assurance Program is concerned, Criterion I of 10 C.F.R. 50, .. , Appendix B places the ultimate responsibility for the establish-ment and execution of such a program on Consumers Power Company. ,! This ultimate responsibility cannot be delegated to either an I independent organization, Bechtel or the Atomic Energy Commission. Cri'terion I does allow Consumers Power Company to delegate to - another organization the actual execution of the execution of quality control activities, provided 'that such delegation is , clearly delineated. For the Midland Facility, Consumers has chosen Eto delegate to: Bechtel and B & W the quality control activities which
~
constitute 'he t first line of quality assurance while retaining 1 I
,* .d t.
h&
~
.,.4
]
-;A m.
~
its ' ultimate responsibility for the Quality Assurance Program. Inherent in such delegation'is a requirement that both B & W _ and Bechtel establish Quality Assurance programs to determine whethe or not their Quality Control activities are being properly imple-mented. B & W and Bechtel have established such Quality Assurance
. . +, ~
programs and are, in fact, carrying out these responsibilities. Consumers-fulfills its responsibility by reviewing, prior to '.~ their implementation, the procedures utilized by its delegates , to perform their quality functions and by performing audits of , itsdelegateestodeterminethattheseprocedures,onceestablihbd. and approved, are carried out. Consumers Power Comp ny' believes g, that for the Midland project, this program accomplishes the goals set forth in 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix B for the following reasons: . E di;. (a) Since the first line of assuring quality rests ~ [ upon the organization performing the work, the actual imple- - mentation of Quality Control should be the responsibility of that organization. As indicated above, these quality functions 1 are now being perft aned by Bechtel and by B & W. The addition of another organization dealing directly with quality control and quality assurance could very well have a negative result in that personnel within an organization performing a specific work i function might assume that another organization would locate l and' report quality problems thus diluting the overall quality effort.
+
l' s
'dA A
g g
.. -- T
1 . -. ~, :
,,o'
+. . . .
~
j' ' '
-',{ *.\*
s( : t
.g_
, .+ . . . - . i .. - .,
+
, s ,. , . -
z 4,;p
.e n .
x c u , -: g
._52_ ,
' inq .
> .-% . v:
(b)' . Consumers, Bechtel and B & W have had direc t M.,.i
- - experience with the evolution of the interpretation and <
, - 4]7 : .
I .' 4 application of 10 C.F.R. 50,. Appendix B requirements with , i respect,to,the Midland project. As a result, these groups are ,
, W &..
more ' aware of the current Atomic Energy Commission requirements' than would be a third party new to the project. , ?,
. . .g .
wij;% -> Consumers believes that its overall Quality Assurance
.. q;rina
~
Program should be periodically reviewed by an independent organiza-J 1 c. #ECQ tion to determine whether its program satisfies Appendix B and'.1 f'$
?::n,
.y w it is' properly implementing the requirements of~that regulation.' f, y
,% * 'a*- '
c s.. ry d.g, g ; ,.-; l Thepersonspreparing~theanswertothisinterrogato ;
- ' are as follows:
~
N3 e;0DTP
. : '?Mrig.
. , 2. m . , . -
r fort '[ '.'f -[ *, ) Mrs. Gilbert S. Keeley Consumers Power Company f$.q.,h' '
! 1945 Parnall Road ' ..
4 Jackson, Michigan 49201 ' ' d,y.Tch ].O
, J.,;n:'
.a, i R. Rex Renfrow III, Esq. . .> 5G Michael I. Miller, Esq. (,c f[,5 '
Isham, Lincoln & Beale . . ,. - 'r/'- < 4 One First National Plaza -
~ ,' . },. A Suite 4200 '
'-Y '
Chicago, Illinois 60670 (E j ; y 7. , -
.' )
L*' ',,g ~ i
~,~,.c,,,'.-
S- 2'.
. n_'
3 s a (' .',y e
- u=g
, 4 gY
.,='
9 W_
;;. Y. -
4 -- , 4r f, <
,g-
~~
?L- t ^ ~ ,',..f .Q
, :,< + ' , . . JL' .
+-
3 s_--
~%
_ j. , 7,6Q,.,
' .A 'y...
'!- v
\
4[ , a _.. .
?p < > <:Q J W , ^:.LT % y: ,-
; ** .p ,
-ja ; y&~4 Q .
~(. . .
., 1 e
s. 405 o - , s
. .. . f s
' INTERROGATORY 21. Identify and describe each violation'
, . v . .
- t of any regulation which has been committed by Consumers Power ,
' s, ,
company.with respect to each of its facilities. . > -* 4 4' 5 ANSWER: See answer to Interrogatory 1. , 3 .Q , 1- . - <: ,
- s ;. .p, 3 s
.Yl % f,a ,
s i
- l~ , ,
kf W k 1 g
., ,f ',
J,. . g 3' h<g
*. L p g.' '.# .(
+.[p5 s. ,
* ? (f . 5.-
- *,I <
o k4 g ,h O
. ' cj .
$h 4 h -
a. 3
'h 3'5 ;s ..-
. t
,-W y d an 4'. .-
N. '
-b,- ; a [-*E' _,;- g ,64,,,. ,
- . .. . .M. .M ;,~ ,
c f_ ,' % - s a, +1,-.,.-
- m. -
4 *.% ,y
, t . ' 6 ,', .-g.
4 wi '-' [
~ :.
4, z ,=.- p. i ,--t &e.s.
.rJ. ?,
e{ s '# i 8 , i E s. ,f i A W :>
.i'.". ,
l l 1
\
l 4 4 Y 5'
- es s 1 s 9 'O . Q e.
A p- g.. fJ b a f
, W.
i .
- 4
, y y
U,
(* ',
'.4Y
, - + -
=. . .3'
< , > 1
~
4- ., , e v~: :- f, . o L.- ,y < r e g ;'.,. ..n ' ' D,r . . i % i ' ,t l T* #
- 2, fj . L. ' .
E- ' bNi
, ': ' ^ ^ , , ,,
' , ~
+-: , ; f Q Y:./] .
*
- 7 3, ] pyd..
,x
+,
'y - g. . n . . su p,
~
~ .
~3~
; ;'i y V,
'~ s 4 , . _ ,e , INTERROGATORY 22. , Identify each incident by consumers ' g k u-
.. Power Company, Bechtel or Babcock & Wilcox at each of its facilities which.was investigated as a possible violation NG1 ~
.. m u- -
7 . s ~.'.k. t
- but.as to which you concluded no violation existed.
. f/
= :4, ;
l , G. ; ,- , ' , , -y .
' ANSWER: Attached to this answer are two lists which : ,.c
{. are copies of the Nonconformance Summary Logs for the Midland . The first list' covers reports (QF-1 to QF-12 and Project. ,W
- p. Y, g m
j 4.f;h represents those NCR's which relate to activities at the ,
;.y YG1
. .b-, QQiT
- Midland site. The second list covers reports #1-64 and represents NCR's which are not related to Midland site activities M@~ d N N
l (i.e., Consumers General Office, Bechtel Ann Arbor, B & W, etc.)4'.:.; M, Since April of 1972 (the effective date of Paragraph (e) of 10 ~. [;b nv
?':,m * .Kf f r g C. F. R. 50.55), each NCR has been evaluated for reportability to th i i
{ ogM AEC in ac'cordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e). Of those nonconformance N i reports the following were determined to be reportable. ' ? h l 1
~ W@4 .
a p.& 1
- 1. Discrepancy Notice #42 relating to the lack 'l I 4 .
i 4 of proper documentation for welding electrodes used in the Unit #2 steam generator at the B&W . l
- 3 4 Barberton facility.
n,,,
- 2. Nonconformance #0F-1 relating to deficiencies in ,
i _c- - j cadw21 ding activities at the Midland site. ' 3.. . Nonconformance #48 relating to the lack o'f a .
-1{.
B&W - Lynchburg procedure requiring that [ Lwhen~ design is to be verified by testing N l
; ;a..
that; testing is to be to the most adverse #~
' 4. 7 design conditions. :
l1 ,. :
> > u g * ,.
t "
' 5" ' [! b 1
y
? ,.
vs
',y a -. *
. -J- ; . '
,m.
Q,? . [ l- ; v i' * - 7
~
' 5-b s
_ ,i ,
_ . y , a - c. n y '
~:3 c:.:,3
,v -
- ~
...- o , . -
. . , ' S (^l
. lA list of NCR's issued by Consumers is attached as Exhibit 1. The files specifically pertaining to these NCR's
* ~
are set forth in the answer to Interrogatory 1. , 'f'
, ,4 ,
.- Prior to March of 1974 when deficiencies were dis-covered during audits, these deficiencies were reported in the form of nonconformance reports as discussed above. Since
~'
March of 1974, certain deficiencies which were discovered _h
'7
- during audits were reported in the form of nonconformance reports, s,
and other deficiencies were simply reported in the body of the
,[n,. y audit report. Generally, the deficiencies which were only T x ;'. . %
reported in the body of the report were eithe'r of little j ' Y. significance and corrective action may have been initiated ,
^
prior to the audit. The specific audits.since March o_f 1974 is,x which contain deficiency information in the body of the report f were the March 11-13, 1974 audit of Bechtel-Ann Arbor and the May 2,,1974 audit of the consumers Midland Project organizatiJns. In each case, these deficiencies were evaluated and it was determined' that the items either lacked significance or the group being ,
.s audited had initiated sufficient corrective action prior to the audit so that a nonconformance report was not considered necessary. l Had they been considered reportable, a nonconformance report would I
l have been written in addition to reporting the deficiency to the
-AEC. ,
l Following is a summary of each of the deficiencies I
. in the above'two reports for which nonconformance reports were not issued:
~
v.
~
e L , s e
- . k > l , ],
~
; 1j
. ,m
' ', ,: r .-:
~ mn
.: -;; ;.. x
~
Ij
.$- t # '
., f
'5. '"
A. The Audit'of Dechtel - Ann Arbor March 11-13, 1974 l.. During a review of the Bechtel NQAM it was found that the NQAM did not address some of the requirements for contents of procurement documents which are contained in the _ . 7.- Procurement Document Control (Criterion 4) of ANSI , [', ;;% '-
~
N45.2. A copy of a draft of Section III No. 2 of the
. s, NOAM was produced which will address these require- af.
s >+ . ments. Therefore, this item will be held as unresolved ;!
. . 2,E~h pending the release of an acceptable Section III No. 2 y;p :;;
x .y , of the NQAM. .;[kj '
- 2. During the audit it was found that several copies of the .
NQAM were not up-to-date. Bechtel QA has called in all h~
!{ fi copies of the Midland NQAM to determine which ones need .,$ h,' .-
updating. Bechtel is also devising a system for further ' l~~ ~ Ti control of the NQAM. This item wi'l be held as unresolved ' pending the completion of the review of NQAMs and the , , development of a modified system to provide for increas~de
. control of NQAMs. N 2
- 3. During the audit it was found that the responsibility -
for preparation, review, and approval of the Midland Project Quality Assurance Detailed Audit Plan was not net' defined as is required by criterion No. 7 of ANSI . N45.2. This item will be held as unresolved pending the ,- definition of the above responsibilities. - l
- 4. 'During the audit it was 'found that Bechtel Procurement o
Inspectors do not have a procedure for auditing ei vendors under the requirements of 10 CFR 50', Appendix B, ls
~
' - . ' " , %e@j
, ~ ,
- jv , y _ _
.m
, 1 m
- ~
< > , ,, +
w ...
.. ,. ~
, - . ... Wg -4
, , x. .
1' ^ ' ^' M. x.;d. m i '_
~ -
['
- ;~.,
<<< .v . ,, ,y
* $ # * '# , N ,,,
.- . .. . : . - . . .. . .c i-.
p 9; as implemented by ANSI N45.2. It was also learned that a pro-
+. .. + . . ,
y,
~
cedure (No. BPI-396) is being prepared. This item will be ,'"' held as unresolved pending the release for use of an
~
. ', j
. si,,>.
adequate procedure for Procurement Inspection Auditing. . y
' 5 '. Du ing the audit it was found that Bechtel engineers -
J %s ,- were using a draft versfon of the Bechtel Midland' 1
.,./'
-Project Procedures Manual. This manual lacked proper
#: e g'..
approval for use. Since the approved version of this , , %e .. ,
- .. . n manual was targeted for issue on April 8, 1974, this .M-
, : . : ..,1.
item will be held hs unresolved pending that issuance. ~f[d4
. . j i
&3
- 6. During the audit it was found that the Engineering ;. ' ;q.
- i Department Procedures did not clearly define the e [;
. ; c. c Engineering Department organization (The Internal P ,.7 v7.y Procedures Manual did provide some coverage, however.)'. y
. m.
An EDP 2.13 is scheduled for issuance in mid-June of 'W~.y 1974. This EDP should provide the needed definition, . j but this item will be held open pending the release of .., ['{ . a procedure which adequately defines the Engineering ,
..a
-organization. ,
- 7. During the audit several deficiencies were noted in -
relation to Bechtel's use of the Design Documents s.. Requirements Procedure. The first item relates to the fact that the procedure was not' adequately controlled. [ Bechtel will be including this procedure in their '. _ Engineering Department Procedures as an Engineering Department Project Instruction. The second item relates .s;x
. .u' 'i 4
,"f'
[ f j ] _ ;' [,
~. 4 A y o *- p k.f 5- s ,
s
. .~ '
.. r= . , ,, j g s qg
7 - = --g-g. g i g, .h, f, e w" h s .[ e
>. r J. (,{:. *
, j.l[.
,3) g.%.]g 1 , .
, . ,,., - enb , , + . oc ~
.gg -- 4th r)-
,."'a.
2 58-
< s -
. c. ;
j- -,
, , 1 -
.,y
. . :: q . g..
<m <> -
e wg,
. - . =
p *, ;. 7 '
. .q!
o 7 3.. p z
- i to the. fact that'the procedure does not provide ade- Y-o r, s quatecoveragefor"loopclosing"ofproblemswhic5are,'1,.
f l S cq" detected during the implementation of the procedure nor.
- y -.,4 -
ew
. does it say 'what must happen to the design document while _
4
. .mc problems are being resolved. This item will be held as - , 'j s
' EE m4 unresolved pending the release of an adegtate Design
- mL. ",
Documents Requirement Procedure as an Engineering {,,,
; a E (j 2;/{
Department Project Instruction. sfQ 8.. Section II, No. 6 of the NQAM (1 March 1974) requires . ,". .w e : <;K' rnw.
, .& .t 42 l that " Design verification shall be performed in accord- ,M3 ance with sritten procedures which meet the requirements. M@$i
'y h(
k, t ~ . ' of ANSI N 45.2.11." During the' audit those procedures ]fC
- qp
- were" not available because not enough time had elapsed 4,
jg
..m . . m I '-
n cf; Q rg i since the change in the NQAM. This item will be held as _. ,. ,,.4 unresolved unt'il adequate procedures for design veri- .. . .gj si.Q. 3 3 :p fication are prepared. ,43My -
;4:
- 9. When Bechtel's Quality Engineers review Vendor Quality ,7 Assurance Program Manuals, the mechanism for obtaining ']n.
corrective action is not clearly defined. Bechtel is ? ^{
\- working on a procedure which will define this mechanism, ,
' therefore, this item will be held as unresolved pending the release of an acceptable procedure. . -
j{f,. 4C
- 10. For the Midland Project, Bechtel Engineering currently -
p.1 imposes specification G-23 (Vendor Quality Assurance ,
. Program Requirements). This specification differs to .
f~
.- e some extent from that specified in Engineering Department. ,
- d .
..my3 v.a,gw
* ' ~ -
2,z , -., ,s r.- , ,- ,. : - n' a. ' '
* lY.[ h'.T lh
~
y .4_ r Q:',
- v
'r \?n-" '
,:. =
s
' ' . z.:., _ ,,, ry , . . ,
i 6 . . ,_ *
'},._
. , ?: +
, 5 *- rv _ } .-- . ;;; ..: ; , _
9
= . .
. a: ,u
. ' -. ~f,oc
.+. . . , 3 n :.e .
. 'uc~ w7.,'
+
2 ,, , Procedure 6.10. Therefore, an Engineering Department y: - Project Instruction (EDPI) should be issued covering 1; the use of G-23. This item will be held as unresolved -
'- ,' ?
'pending the release of an acceptable EDPI. ,[
q.
- 11. Engineering Department Procedure No. 5.32 addresses the f.;
s Retention of Records, but it requires the establishment of
.an implementing system for retention of records, which was g
~'
not available for review. This item will be held as un--
+v. .
resolved pending the development of a system which describes ] what documents will be maintained and how they will be
; * .. u
[ f* ' , **+ l
, .-m. :
maintained. - s
-f@ u l,
" ~
[.4 B. The Audit of the Consumers Midland Project Organization _.,
',1 '
May 2, 1974
' \ l
-t .r 3.if's
- 1. The Electric Plant Projects holici'es & Procedures Manual #
a.1y. s
~ ~ '<- y-(1.4.2) requires approval of the Project Q-List by: L :;
(a) Project , (b) Engineering Services # (c) Project Quality Assurance Services There was no documentation available that could verify that Engineering Services, and Quality Assurance Services , l had approved the Q-List, although such review had taken 1 place. - 4 s ~ 6 a % 4
.'g,.
~ o D** "'
.1 '- ,
. ,: e.
*'.. e - ,
4 e , ?[ - * ' s '3'
. . ' " -^ "
[ $ ^)[ Q_ ,Mf
~
+ ,
' ' a'"~-~ - - '
* .j, ..:> e . .y; w;m.
g; ' '.
- 1. i x ;
^
. n , fqp :
,;,ny X
[~ . .Ot i
'l _ -.,
n , q . r. -
, gp
_ ~60- .x. M ,~
^
s m v;y [ iv
~
- . _ : .';%Q( ,
- 2. The Project did not have procedures for the Distrib- '
++
-h ution and Control of Manufacturers Instruction Manuals ^y
}
as. required by the P&P (3.4.2). i
- 3. The Project indicated that a procedure for th a '
c x,.- Documents and the changes to documents was in the process. , T- [* Lof being written, but was not complete. .j f .i }'4;
" Incidents" identified by Bechtel or B&W but which are f* ,
not deemed reportable under 50.55 (e) are primarily decided by . mrP* } these organizations. Such incidents resolved by Bechte;L are set;nt%:
~
... - .r ;
.gg out in'its answer to Interrogatory 12 in this proceeding.
+ Rf (
, .c
?
.t:
The B & W procedure is as follows: , ci., w;-
% 49 N ;,E R '
I. . . w w. B&W REPORTING PROCEDURE FOR BhEAKDOWN IN QA PROGRAM c t g WW M.:: e f In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50 55 (e) (i), B&W has the respon- ? sibility of promptly reporting to Consumers Power Company any significant e'M, breakdown to any portion of the B&W QA program. The definition, discovery, and method of reporting are set forth in a procedure in the B&W Administration Ei ; Manual. This procedure deals with: organization applicability, deficiency ;, . , definition (per 50.55 (a) (1)), responsibility for discovery and reporting, preparation and approval of deficiency reports, and notification to Consumers . Power Company. The procedure covers documentation of both significant -g: ,. breakdowns in the QA program which satisfy the requirements of 50.55 (e)(1) " .' And those lesser deficiencies which do not. The procedure covers work per-formed in engineering design, ' fabrication, and testing by B&W and its vendors. Consumers Power Company are: Discrepancy Nob ce #h2 " Undocumented Weld Wire" A Non Conformance #h8 " Testing to Most Adverse Conditions" . II. AEC CITATIONS FOR B&W N'ON-CONFORMANCE WITH APPENDIX "B" , , 1
;;: l There have been no AEC citations for non-conformance on the Midland project. ,
) $
.J s
l $ ?
~
** !^
1
'6, ,
\
-: j
/ <
? -
[,,~
- ' :x,,$_ff" _
x & ' ~
r ' l .j. n s . q i
.-__:~.,-.
}.
y 'j [ pf^ ,
- f. y }} .,
2 3 ;;f{5y-{aya Q: s,- . ?9 ; ' g, q , , g^ 4 /:
+
> u - , , ' .
3", - u
~
y . ;W _.;p pm _. aq. ;, j / w -
+
.- , 2' +v > .
. n. -
.,rrt m ,. ..
1 - -
. m
'L
+. - *
. ~-
. :: c, , ., g _ ... %
~ '
w , 7: y:, ;
~ " _l i
jg , III., B&W PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING " SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS" j# .Q,, n , i . Deviations from equipment specifications and drawings during the course of 7,g , ! manufacture are handled in accordance with either of the following two pro- 7; i a' l cedures from the B&W Administrative Manual.
~
3 N NPG-OkO5 Disposition of Non-Conforming Item-FOB Components ,f
..-M
'- NPG-OkO5 Approval of Variation Requests from Accessory Vendors - u o g. The -Oh procedure deals with deviations originating in B&W shops or that of ,.c 7 - their suppliers. The -05 procedure deals .with deviations of accessory equip-
-ment which B&W buys. In either case, when the equipment manufacturer determines that a deviation exists that violates the drawing or specifiation, he prepares ;
- a variation notice (VN) which fully describes the problem and the proposed repair.'""
This VN is sent to the B&W task engineer who will determine: (1) whether the
- proposed repair will re' move the non-conformance, (2) whether replacement of
'Mi the part is required, or (3) if the item can be used "as is." If in the **
judgement of the B&W task engineer, the item as repaired or "as is," is still ~ usable but deviates from the specificaticr4 or involves an interface with CP Co's
,J l
' equipment, describes theaproblem, " contract the variation" recommended (CV)disposition, notice is prepared. and justification Thisfor CV which fully acceptance is reviewed by the B&W organization which prepared the equipment H M,7 ' specification and tt,- T iW P eject Manager, both of whose signatures are 4 required before the work can proceed.
- 1, j ,
U(J6 ' c. W . '
&- 't, The B&W Project Manager, together with the B&W Manager of Licensing will, as: ~ W appropriate,' make a determination as to whether this should be reported to ' IO CP Co as a "significant deficiency" per 50 55 (e) in accordance with B&W pro- 11 a f cedure NPG-1707 (Rev. 0) "Reportirig Significant Deficiencies." ,YJ 4 ~,
, g III. Examples of contract variations on Midland equipment which were not reported to Consumers Power Company and, therefore, may be considered under'the category of " suspected violations" are:
Date Number Description i E/6/72 CV-212 kMTV Variation in 0-ring groove depth 12/13/73 CV-212-5MTV Variation in len6th of instrument nozzles
- 1/29/74' CV-212-51-5MTV Over ground area in 0-ring groove ,
2/2/74 CV-212-51-8MTV U-T in lower head guide lug area
.M s-
. . . .i s
k
- h ' ;
~
.h~
\
\ t.
y
$%Q 4O "]^ y s 54 c - ,
T , s- , ,
' y,g * ~ _ W-@j
_y -7 < -s gA a Tye,c;M -- ' ', u.
- g, ; ,m.* ,-- e ,
. _,.x
.2 - -
my. ., .
,2,5 % 1 vg
'"U N e se NONCOM 09%I8C3 L'@.tBBffE@
.iklen 1'ile ' ~-
~
~
,L., Co;'1c'/ . EXHIBIT 1 Issued Criterion .,
gyp Brief Description D File No To l Date Close Dite Involved u./ 9/72 12/6/73 Codveld Problems - gr-1 1634 c. L. - Richanisc 1 . 2/7/74 6 App B to C-111 (Liner Plate) QF-2 16.3 4 E. E. t2/6/73 Felton
~
2/20/74 15 Improper Tagging of noncen-QF-3 16 3 6 J. P. 1/16/7L - foming "B" Series Cadweld Connolly .i Splices
~
2/19/74 9 "SluCGing" a Icak Chace Weld ' QF-4 1634 E. E. 1/16/7h . Felton *
. . a.
,1634 E. E. 1/25/7h 2/20/74 5 Icah Chase Pressure Test QF-5 -
Felton
- R, Cadweld Rei.nspection Re-QF-6 16.3 6 Z. G. 1.23 74 3/27/'74 Tucker .- calculation l^$f.
1634 E. E. 2/6/74 3/5/74 9 Weld Rod Control in the Line: > QF-7 Plato Arca Felton ' 2 Champi".a QA Manual Problens c' J 1636 E. E. 2/19/74 3/20/74 (Batch Picnt) l Felton _
, I 7 Bechtel QC Cement Receiving QF-9 1636 J. P . 2/5/7h 3/20/74 Pile" .-
Connolly ,
'f
1631 P. A. 3/28/7h 4/29/74 3' Failure to Follow PSAR on QF-10 Liner Plate Radiography-Martinez qr-n 1636 J. P. 4/1/74 6 Field Stick Files Connolly . y 16 50:55(c) Reporting of IK:R's QF-12 1636 J. P. 4/1/74 Conno.a.y .
- . 'l
\
- 3
. t
- v. T Attachment 8-3 7
~
T/15/74 .
~
1 and 2 % NONC0!TFORMANCE
SUMMARY
LOG Unit m, Criterion
- f Issued RPT Clone Date Involved Brief Description
-No File No To l Date 2/9/70 Shop Inspection -
'[ : ,
1 1633 acchtel 1/22/70 , . W. E. 2/3'/70 spec Issued for Purchase Vith , 2 16.2 1/25/7C out Engineering Approval l Kcasler ' J. D . . [[_ Taccoe , spec Issued for Purchase With 16.2 N. E. 1/25/7C 2/ 3/70 , 3 - out Engineering Approval l Kessler . J. D. . . lescoe , 2/3/70 spec Issued for Purchase with ' 4 16.2 W. E. 1/29/70 out EnSincering Approval Kessler , v,, g J. D. Icscoe US4
.S i spec Issued for Purchase with '
5 16.2 W. E. 1/h/70 2/3/70 out En6ineering Approval
. Kessler J. D . .
Iesece . ". , s 2/3/70 sp2e Issued for Purchase With 6 16.2 U. E. 1/29/70 ' out En51 *-neerins Approval ' Kessler -
*1 .
~
J. D. *
.. , rpi .
yescoe 5/20/70 Direct copies of Inspection 7 1633 Ecchtel 3/31/7c ' acports ;. sliop Inspection - 8 1633 Iechtel s/7/70 2/26/71 shop'Inspeetion 9 '1633 Bechtel 5/7/70 s/14/70 ~' DEPection Reports lo 1633 Bechtel s/7/70 7/15/70 Direct copies of Inspectice 11 1633 Icchtel 6/2/70 8/7/70
- RCPorts .
Direct Copies of Inspection 12 1633 Bechtel 6/2/70 8/7/70 - Reports Document control (Doc-1) 13 16.2 v. E. 6/2/70 h/n/72 Kass1cr Purchase Procedure 14 1633 rechtel 6/17/70 9/18/70
- 15 16.2 v. E.
Kcasler 7/1/70 8/10/71 Or6anizat. ton (A-2) 16 16.2- W. E. Organization (A-2) i 7/1/70 8/10/71* Kess1cr '
- (._
. ,m w
j .'_ ,
.. . NoNCofff0IUWicu buy.r.iuu wu ,
s + j 1 Issued . Critcrion _. RPT Close D.te Involved Brief Descriptien No rile no To l Ddte W. E. 7/ 2/70 8/10/71 Organization (A-2) 16.2 17 Kessler ,' .,. ,, l 18 16.2 W. E. 7/2/70 1C/16/70 orcanization (A-2) ; Kessler ,'.- 16.2 W. E. 7/2/70 10/26/70 orcanization(A-2) 19 Kessler . ,
~
organization (A-2) 20 16.2 R. c. 7/2/70 8/12/70 Youncdahl ,. , Q-List - 21 16.2 W. E. 6/30/70 11/23/70 ' [
- Kessler ,
16.2 R. R. 7/2/70 8/10/70 Field. QA Procedures 22 > :r , Johnson . N. G. - Paige Procedure for Writing Preo
. 23 16.2 W. E. 7/3/7c 4/23/71 Tests Procedures Kessler 7. -
construe'ica Dept RA Proced: 24 16.2 J. D. 7/3/70 8/26/70 ' Iescoe -
. w.
16.2 W. E. 7/2/70 '7/13/70 Procedures for other Phases 25
- of Project Kescler -
16.2 W. E. 7/s/70 10/26/70 Docu=cnt control (Doc-1) 26 Kessler , 16.1 c. Q. 7/s/70 8/10/70 Procedure D&C-1 27, - Hills . . Purchase Procedure 1632 9/18/70 28 v. E. 7/22/7c - Kessler Bechtel Direct copies of Inspection ' 29 16.3 3 7/22/7c 10/15/70 . Reports - Vendor UDT Cert' Records 30 1633 M. P. s/17/71 11/22/71 Unavailabic Hanson . _ BechtelInspection-Frequ$ 31 1633 M. P. 5/19/71 6/8/71 of Reports Hanson . Bechtel Vendor Audit Progre ! 32 16.3 3 M. P. 6/8/71 9/15/71 . . l IIanson , if. P. 6/ 8/71 9/15/71, Ecchtel In-IIouse Audit l f 33 . 16.3 5 Progrcm >) Hanson i i c . 1* 3'/12/74
~
kcacirnent 8-3 [ ,'- , . S[%
u1 u ,
.C .,
NONCOM 0!UtAf?CLM WP%%R9F ' . .
< - , y . . -
- _,* *y ~
Issued
. Criterion , .
Brief Description-RPT To D:ite Close D.te Involved. File No 1 Na ' Material. Ecquisitien Issued j 1632 M. P. 7/ 6/71 8/13/71 , forPurchasev/oEcchtel
- 34 Hanson J
Approval ,1 1 Unabic to cenfirm rcquired , 35 1633 M..P. 8/2/71 11/19/71 minimum experience for scce ! Hanson inspectors Weldin6 Elcetrode Storage l 36 16.4 3 ".P. M 8/11/71 8/25/71- .x \ Hanson '
+. i M. P.: 9/23/71 4/4/72 Storace of Tube-sheets at l 37 16.k.2 . Barberton .
Hanson Improperly processed cP co 38 16.2 M. P. . 1.0/15/71 6/12/72
- originated spec ,
Hanson , w-M. P. 6/26/72 Dwg error; re: velding , 39 16.4.2 4/18/72 require =ents g3 Hanson ,
.q e 6/26/72 Impropar mill certs on tube 40 16.4.2 M. P. 4/10/72 ~
support plate . Hanson Error on HDE report. Steel [ 41 16.4.2 M. P. 4/18/72 6/26/72 Identification improperly Hanson
. ' * ~~ ~
copica j ..l 3/29/74 7 ImproperandMissingWeldini h2 16.4.2 M. P. 7/14/72 " Hanson , Electrode Records . 3/1/74 7 Improper Mn1 certs 43 16.4.2 M. P. 6/6/72 . Hanson E. V. 8/28/73 18 Insufficient Audit Reconis 44 16.4.1 DeCarli 2 Up-Date PAW 1346 QA Plan 4s 16.4.1 n.'s. t2/17/73 .. . hbrey 3 IReview for Suitability of
. h6 16.4.1 N. S. L2/28/73 Appliention hbrey 3 control of Design Interface.
16.4.1 N. S ., .L2/28/73 *
. 47 hbrcy . ,
3 Prototype Testing ' 48 16.4.1 n, S. L2/28/73 .
~
bbrcy
,L2/28/73 3 Accessibility for Maintenan
,49 16.4.1 N. S. and Repair bbrcy 15 TaE61ng of Honconforming 50 16.4.11 H. S. L2/28/73 Itens .. .
anbrey ,
~
-- ( _.2-~. .. , a
~~ '
_ fV6Wh&L . ._ _? z , m n Attacb=ent 8-3 .n. u
- ~ _ _ _ ~
_ ^
. Unit 1 a Tn2 c.. .
RONC0hTOTJ'.ANCE SUNX LOG . Criterion Brief Description ; Issued yg To l Date Close Date , Involved N3 File llo i 15 Hotification of Honconfom-H. S. 12/28/7: ance to Mfg , 31 16.4.1 Embrey ' 6 Alministrative Manual Not 12/28/02
- Controlled l 16 4;l N. S .
52 Embrey . l 5 Procedures for @ 16 3 1 P .' A . h/I/71 Surveillance 53 Martinc: ' l 16 - Reporting of QE 16 3 1 P. A. h/1/71 - Honconforuneco l 54 Martines Manacccent Activity in QC f 1 to 2 16 3 1 P. A. h/1/71 - 53 - Martines ^ 3 Drawing Signoffs P. A. 4/1/71 - p 56 1631 .n Martine.
. 6 Design Review Checkoff - C' 1631 P. A. 4/1/71 y 57 Martinc:
12 Inspectors verification ~ 1633 J. 1. 4/1/71 .
. of Calibration 56 Southard Retentien of Assicnnent 1633 J. L. 4/1/71 ,
Transmittal Fom ,, 59 Southard 1 visibility for Inspection 60 1633 J. L. h/1/71 - Supervisors Activities Southard * ~ 2 UQAM Deficiencies 61 16 3 V. F. h/1/71 , Holub 2 Deficiencies in the Inland-62 16.3 1 P. A. 4/5/7L Ryerson QA Pro 6 ram Plan Martine: , 18 Failure of Inland-Rycrson te 16.3 3 J. L. h/5/7L implecent audit co==itments 63 Southard 2 Documentation of training 64 16.2 M. P. 4/26/7h - - Hansort _
+ -
P , . I 6 . a
* ~
y .
' - -; ;p,<>.-.t.,. n ,:p .,
* - .- . - ; ' ;i. ,
.o ,
- , ~
.: ~. u ; 1.y ;.
.b
..c. - ., . - > '. - ,.
s
- ~
.,. ..uc.
. , 1
,l
, f. ; -
-L x. , ..; - ,
, .s.
~
s * , "eA
.c,..
INTERROGATORY 23. Identify each violation of regu- '? m-lations in each of Consumers Power facil'ity for which you have been cited but as to which no reporting was made at the time - ( of its occurrence. ,, /
~
-y
* :* r; y
See Company response to Interrogatories Nos. . e ANSWER: , 1 and 22.
~
3
.f?
e +, . r..;,- .> ? 3.5U3d
. c %tp<
1
- a,,-g , e , _
i _ 1 ) > J ;f 3 ' o n,U 'p . = ,
.< s; .
4' "y:1.- )C..r~1, , ..
' h Q..;t?
r, o T i, 2 r s! s M: . v 4 3 ;- - '
- sr*
X.., 4"1 1; :q g p,-
+
. .\ s[*, f. ,> [
. - jh L ., ' .
?lll Q']l n ? ,
i
- k.s _g .*gf
' v( '
o l
-)
a m l I e Q 'l s P
<;,. I I
. l l
l i 1
, . . 1 t
/
4 6
*. s . . .~
4 e e s
.s .,
..<- .,w,,.
4 % g ~ l
~<' .,
- e ': .
, ' ~' '
~, '
* ;1 * +: Y '
~
3l J; * ., (l2, _[, , t 'J , ,6 . f- 5 ;_
3 - - -: . . , s
- -- p . y . , n. - qgj7 .
+ ,
. -c* .
. s
*-.., 7,6 - ,.
.g 3.g 1 n s:..fs
- q. , . x:
( ;-
, v . /'e ,
r
._n.. :., ,.,..,
' ' '. s
,. . O..
. ~ .
.- . - . y, g.- f l.% ryg .>4 p t
. x ro.. m.. *
. ,. r. . .
.f,
,y * ' ;y *,'
4.:
- INTERROGATORY 24. To the extent not covered in your answer to Interrogatory No. 1, identify each document whether interna:
to your company or not which relates to or discusses any vio-
,f, :t .
lation-or suspected violation of any applicable quality assur- i;c,
. n,,
.,. t, a,
ance or quality control procedure or regulation for each of L
. ..t .s .
- - ;. .w:.
your facilities. >
- m. w
- 4 ANSWER: See Company response to Interrogatory No. 1 ., hy
',5 ,_< -e#
4,
# , , I
', :.._c.~
g ..
. a s y. s - -g s
; 4.~-, .. A h n'$c .
r <e- .b
. - r a 2p
- %,, Y.{:'^ ,g . ;;j s L -
- g. . . e'h . i hy k '*1,*'t ,
< **g>i,
_2 . ,
- 1 +.3M. , '.y- .
3 4 e Ns q;~. r[a,y - ,
'q .s;;/./? .
~ , ,
a c. _>'_'fgs..
'g . [ T_4,.%,
l , , ' ., >Nj~s
.:.n; ~ , !
, 1+ ? i' .: '
,q " Q_.;+, r
,. , ,2 ?&b ? ^
X 6 . y S p.
>:j ' . . ,?;jh.%
4 3
'tb
. >% , s, * '
. f f
-.1.,,
, .. . 4. 5. .
# , .5 e f ,
., ',' C . -
( . l
+ $.
.f.
a ,. 4 'y
} l g ".
- t f,
* + 9 6
e M
* .-y p i -
.y
...f
, , y',
4 l l 3 e4 a.
* *a
- e ,1~
~ '
- . . . . , j
..t. j 9 ')'7 3 % -
# > j
=
.~t..
)in
.s
^:f', '
- *
- p'- r T s ,5*- ',; ,;y .o,
< r i
s * .c. .
. J e%,. s
,y, s...
* * ' ,- ' t '
+
y ,',s f ,
,>,. s e ]; ^ i
' t -i<y j
e egtg
, 3
. h y. , =g; . ' n , ,
. .ws
^.sl. #[ ,__m ,. . . g",y' *p, .,..
e
}- 4 y '; w, "
_ ':;*, _; .4- , .
- ,,.e y -
.[:
g- s 3- ,_. _ w} -
7*
~
, 7 p M ~.
s.
~
~ Lr; -
.=. ,
.,?
_ .;; ; :. 2;> ,-
' * ; , -(
s . . . z-
- ; . ', , . . ' 4~.'
- v. ;
~
. , -- 6 5 - ..
4 m. { {., INTERROGATORY 25. Beginning with January, 1970, [ . describe your quality assurance and quality control procedures 0
) .,
in existence for each of your facilities (whether for construction'
~
.t. '
or for operation) and then describe each change you have made, I to the present, in each of said procedures specifying theI.clr-cumstances for the change, the reasons'for the change and what , follow-up or review you have done regarding each said change. .
, 24
. . .a 4 ANSWER: The QA procedures in existence for design and 7,
' GWR Q.
~
construction of the Midland facility since 1969 together with
...7 1 the reasons for each change are as follows: i f,{.79
. a-A. QA Program Type Manuals and Project Procedures Manual
- 1. 'The Consumers Power Comp.any QA Program was issued h.
as Appendix 1B to the PSAR and was updated by Aatendments No. 4 on
- c. L>
10/2/69, No. 6 on 12/29/69, and No. 8 on 2/9/70. *
~..t, These amendments were issued to provide the AEC with additional details beyond that stated in Appendix 1B.
- 2. The Midland Consumers Power QA Program Audit H Manual was issued on 7/1/70 to provide detailed implementing ,
procedures, organization, and responsibilities. <
- 3. On August 1, 1970, the Field Audits and Inspection Procedures Manual was issued by Generating Plant Construction
- l 1
L Department. This manual was. issued to provide Field Audit and l
. . 1 Inspection Procedures which were to be used by ' Consumers a
Power Company QA Field personnel. [Ip;.' u " ', , , y , [* *
, . ? +,
}",.T.,a; M[ 7 S [ N 5j
~~ ^
. s' .' . < . 'q.{f
.,1
..y ' , *
,f $; %).... f, e,
* 'n.,. .' '*
.c Q: .'U
.s
,.yg o
. o.'
4,,, , , . x, . 3.a : . , , , n < 2- -
. ,. , ~ .7 , e m. , , .g3. ~.yf,, '
- - ~ .. . ,
', m . % ; g,;.
, , . . . . c
.~
., . :*:~ ~
.: , m. y ~ g:
_ , -y ,
,.r e, . y :.:.
'X
,f., .
s ugg. . . _ I, y ',,; M 4;,' ; 5MW, g.
- + .c q *. - +,
+' '
z. s -
~
, ~f- j . p., ,
s g.',,4 - - f,.,, ~ yx ,K q.::
- .. ,.. s . , . .-
.( .
^ ,,. ;i '. ' .
- 4. On 8/31/71, the Midland Consumers Power QA
- . ~ . .
-Program Audit Manual was upgraded by providing additional add [
+ .; &
i . more detailed procedures than the 7/1/70 issue. - - 7:- ;
, . ,,.c' 3"
~-
- 5. 'On 12/8/71, certain attachments were provid:.d to'thi. 4 8/3/71 QA Program Audit Manual issue to provide more implementing ['
details including clieck sheets. . ,h 9QM
.. ' p:x
- 6. On October 24, 1972 - the Project Procedures Manual.
., xfMg,,
was' issued by the Midland Project Department. This manual f.,
%y :C'.
. included revisions and incorporation of many of the procedures,of~.
w . Q J . yJ .L,,, the previously issued Quality Assurance Mant al, including those' c,1 o procedures dealing with documentation, design control and j
'jh,'
- M ,A; 05;.w i organization of the Project. f .
ayf; e..m
. 5 :. :n; l
~. wm .
; 7. 'On July 1, 1973, the Project Procedures Manual was. I 3: w reissued in a revised format by the-Midland Project Department. >
d '. The revision was made to incorporate the field activities of the
,m ,
Project and administrative changes in General Office procedures.
; ~
8.. On 7/16/73, the QA Program Audit Manual was re- , written based upon the interpretation of the 18 criteria in Appendix B as it existed at that time. ,
- 9. On 8/24/73, the Midland QA Manual was written to' describe the QA Prooram for the Midland Project. As a result i
, s of the AEC Inspection on 7/23-26, 1973 and 8/8-10, 1973, Consumers Power Company.. rewrote the Midland QA Program Plan to indicate .
- .m
-the commitments made by Consumers Power Company and its contrhetors I
+
, w , l Q&
' ~
, . .c - e- '
'N ' l
.+ ,. -s -V.
r % #_ , . , . Q
,.N _.yy5 _ Q'ssQh; $ l_9 1
, *-' ) .W i
~
, m 1*W .,.;
.G ~
< s . - -Z' R, .
_~*-? Y "'
, '_ ' C;. U*(_ , }%)%J'f% : R;,,4W
.-- .. ,g
,~i ,
. .p . ^~.- . , y. .. : - - -
.;g ;
_ y;.y ; , , %; ?. .3., . v,. vy e a . t
.. . . , s ; ,
m ;p." '
'** ^ h * ! .' "I '
- ~
.. ..;. +
w:~
~ ,.
. q- <
to the Append'ix B Criteria and to show referenced procedures '7
- c. yi on how these commitments were met. .v, ;U >
, .Q .
m .
- 10. On 11/29/73, the Midland QA Manual was reissued .y]-. ,
e , . r. 6 to inclode comments and suggestiions made by the AEC Inspection f
- .},
conducted at the Consumers Power Company General Office on - 10/10/73 and 10/11/73.
'$+
~ . .
- 11. On December 14, 1973 - Revision 1 to the ??-
, 3 74 Midland Project Procedures Manual was. issued. It was a general ",b ,
~r, q N.:. ' '
revision to the manual to incorporate correction of printing
.,4
' 3 ']
errors, administrative changes, etc. ,
+ Y'/r. ~
. :c~
- ':'N
- 12. On February 4, 1974 - Revision 2 to the Midland q. .
.. ,x
. Project Procedures Manual was issued. It was a general revision s,. ,.
p w to the manual to incorporate minor revisions, organizational ' yp Z;h ;, changes, etc.
. s e,. - . ,
v x;
!- ,I
'.v.
- 13. On March _21, 1974 - Revision 3 to the Midland
_ i Project Procedures Manual was issued. It was a general revision . to the manual to incorporate miscellaneous corrections, reductibn of administrative work, etc. , l 14.. On 5/3/74, a redraft of the Midland QA Manual was sent out for comments. This redraft was based on the review jj g, of_the. Consumers Power Company QA Program by NUS. , B. Administrative Type Manuals - f
- 1. On 3/1/73, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 & 10
. .;[ m of the Electric Plant Projects Policies and Procedures Manual ,. ;
3 w.' N - 4 6 ,' , 4 * % ('
.- , ': .. ,Og s
- O~ *k, i, ;.,,. 0 ^"i.' ,y s :} ' '" ?.$ Q Vf
).* - ' ib . 4 O, . S(, 4[$ kl"( G," (j' 1 , '
7$
b,, -
.{ ~ [
.. ;w
-**y, -N D *;~ :
. ' l ,
s- .. u , / s c:4
,;, , . 1: . .t, -
.m .p: , .y
- m. - , ,
. ,. s;
- r
~
- 7. .; -
^ ';
^ (7 4
w l. (EPP P&P)- was issued to provide EPP personnel with Policies (. , and Procedures they were to' function under. . ~. m ,.
- 2. On 4/6/73, minor revisions were made throughout ,'
to ,the EPP P&P. , v ;r
- 3. On 5/31/73, minor revisions were made throughout to the EPP P&P. ' '
, j - c ,
- 4. On 6/29/73, Section 8 on Records was added to .' ,. c ;
~
., ::2 '
the EPP P&P. Section 1.2.3 was updated to provide more '
. 0: . t ' .i.,
->c ;,,y:-
,p ..
defin,ition on control of the manual. ' 3- 7 ,
.,?
- 5. . On 8/20/73 Sections 1 and 5 of the EPP P&P were -
1
~
revised to add operational date definitions, railroad car log l
.i +-l requirements, average agreement requirements and carrier '
,I' 'y y l
notification of strikes. , ,,
/ I y2
- 6. On 9/14/73, Section 4 of the EPP P&P was revised to add description of work to Bid Summary form, changed name of Contractors List to Contract for File Index, to revise procedure -
I relating to requests to be added to vendor bidder lists, . changed j
- l procedures relating to processing and approving Contractor's '
Major Bidders List, to add a procedure for obtaining a new ,
~
bidder approval under special circumstances, and to add a procedure to permit concurrent reviews and bidding in special cases. i
- 7. On 10/31/73, Sections 1, 2 and 5 of the EPP P&P -
were revised to add Environmental Programs security and Environmenta. g g k 1
* ^ 4
- f '
4 , y-
- , ,. r. 3 . g ; - y;-.- x ;p
? - x,
.. ,~ 3.,9**,.
~CO, '*
- . - ~' -L . s ..
.w:~ gfy
. , t
'5 4-'.,,
1%[e . _ . ;.[ [ . _.
, ,) , . , ' . '. , ~L~ *
~%Qf
',.*l ' el ,m '[ ^
.c ~ . . . c b.
- ~~[ . . .
ftg:$
- u. ;
s ,l i
'd'E: @Sk, w . -
, V ;v,.
r ,
. ., ,a '
Activities Department, and to add subsections covering' disposition m.. of surplus materials. -
, , , ;s , ,
ueq . ,
- 8. On 11/15/73, Section 2.3 of the EPP P&P was
,- x %
n revised"to provide additional definition of the Construction m M 09, . i Services organization responsibilities. '
'f%
- -,-v::a.
.. a .
9.- On 11/30/73, Sections 1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7, ./ .~ R
. - a .-
-(
and 8 of the EPP P&P were revised: f.f , , "f u pu .- ' Changed title of Section 7 ori Manual Index. Changed a-
'"; * ~ y.n
%y title of 1.3.3 and 1.4.2. Added.new Sub-section 1.5.5, " Document' M
Security." Revised 1.2.1 by adding procedures to provide feedb'ack._ p :P on unresolved comments.
~
Revised 1.2.3 by adding requirements l'Q
.n for acknowledgment of the P&P Manual and its revisions. Form , ,,] ;
.. q added for use with 1.2.1. Revised 1.3.1 by adding requirementsie "i, ,
;Qg '
for acknowledgment of s,uppertative manuals and their revisions. 7:
. Revised 1.3.3 in its entirety to reflect recent QA changes. ,
p( l
-n ,
Revised 1.3.5.2 to reflect recent QA changes. Revised 1.4.2 . including title change to reflect recent QA changes. Revised 1.5.1.1 by adding that document preparation procedures are - 3 defined elsewhere in the P&P Manual. Section 1.5 - Added 7 1 l Quality' Assurance Services as an informal contact with AEC. aj l' Added 1.5.5, " Document Security." section 2.5 - Revised to _. , reflect recent QA changes in 2.5.1 - 3c, 3f, 31, 3j; 2.5.3 - Z
'3, '3d, 31, 3j , 3k, 31; and 2.5. 4 - 1, 3, 3n. Section 2.6 - -
11 L Revised to reflect recent QA changes in 2.6.1 - 3j, 3k, 31;. - l l ,
- 2.6;2 - 3b8, 3b9, 3b12, 3b13; and 2.6.3 - 8, 12. Section 2.8 - .
- >
1
.s h
.C' . . . , ,
y ., . m.;;f f ;blf y-,
~
'" ~
w; ' .: Q*4_. l ll. 3 n ;x '
% .. ,- ': ; h9-l~ :.m%k l
.< . - ; m,; , ;: - ;. c ?
,_.6
'"<c- n
, , w 'q . ;, , a,
, _.a .? . : .'*+:: '
'%K
V -
- l 7 ' , .;.::- l
' ' i ad- . w p W'
.w. r m'^y< ~
R
~
- y- <_3s - * .p _?y: p 3 c.
'=' ' s
, '3- -
4 ,
. ; 70 .
,\' +mg
. r ,
.w Revised in its entirety to reflect recent QA changes. Section l.
~.
3.2 - Revised first two paragraphs to reflect recent QA changes. Section 3.3 - Revised to reflect recent QA changes. Added 4.2.2,
. .~.
" Quality Assurance Requirements" and renumbered " Approvals for y Changed cor[ tractor to sub- "
Unusual Circumstances" to 4.1.3.
~
- . : ~.
contractor in 4.2.1.1, added reference to N-stamp installer ; x and changed " Contractor's List" to " Contractor File Index." "'M 4: p Section 4.2 - Added reference to N-stamp installer and capitalizatio
,1;l4 4 corrections. Added_ review requirements by Quality Assurance . OC 0%4!i Services to 4'.2.4.1. Eevised second paragraph of 4.3.1 to .
Mfn
~q:.;me,..,
reflect recent QA changes. Quality Assurance Services added to',l E
, a e;?ix 4.3.3 revised to reflect recent QA changes. -' 'p list in 4.3.2.
-7.
~
Reflects title and renumbering changes in 4.5.3. Added Quality
. < .. -G y .& ,)
Assurnee Services as reviewers in 4.6.3 and 4.6.6. Revised 5.1. 3 - ' ~ ,
- +iy -
for clarification by se,gregating CPCo and contractor requirements... n. Deleted " Source Evaluation and Inspection" and " Receiving Y' Inspection" which was moved to 6.3.4. Renumbered " Railroad d. Shipments" to 5.2.1, 5.2.1.1, 5.2.1.2 and 5.2.1.3, respectively.
.e
- Added 5.3.1 " General," renumbered and renamed " Handling" to
...S .
5.3.2 " Material Handling" and revised same to reflect recent , QA changes, renumbered " storage and Preservation" to 5.3.3, added second paragraph to 5.3.3 to. reflect recent QA changes.
- n 5.3.4 " Disposition of Surplus Materials and Equipment" revised clarity and title changes. Section 5.5 - Added new subsecElon
~
for to reflect recent QA changes. Section 6.1.- Added new subsection
" General" to consolidate the different types of inspection from.
^
' P ,1 .i.
] _.
{
- +: ,
4 ' , _.
,. "i j Q
) .' , 4 2 ,
,~ '
.. ..g- a,, p.t .
;;f - % - - _: . +. .
- s. 7. g ...,m.- ?Ny ,
wwpT j'. . q a. , - e, > , , , j., c;r,gizq
- 4. . . m;u, m,y, y
. ~ .y . - ; ,:r; a ,
+ -
. ~
, , 3 pgn
. .m .
5 S'
- a. Q ,;n;
. K,. }, '
c m% Y
*[_
. ; c. ., ; ', .J v . -; - , , . L._ ..N ,d.:"; ',:, .3
,';.n,3 ,.
a % v .. ~ +r, ,, . 4 i ;, 4 y , 4-
- - c
, y;qg
, , , s:q ,
- 4 m y ve.
- ~
Sections 4 and 5 and reflect recent QA changes. . Section
. Z '1 i
. 3y , o
,6.2 - Revised in its entirety t'o reflect recent QA changes .
' . .~
as well as relocation from 4.9. Section 6.3 - Revised to .- c
. .x .,v,< . _.y,,
o :W reflect recent QA changes, renumbered, as well a's relocating z m, ! _
' p , & r.!l[Q ,
" Receiving Inspection" from 5.2.2. Start-up renumbered ~to 27 j
- . n.3.x, reflect above Section 6 additions, revised 6.4.2 and on Sheet 1; '
{C ' 6~to reflect recent QA changes. Section 6.5 - Added " Scheduled 7 p go-
.W 1)
. Equipment Outages." Section 7 - Revised in its entirety (except ,
for " Return Materia 1 Reports") due to recent QA changes. mRevised - MQ4 , f.~, l W
'y. e 4 ,
Section'g(, 8.1.1, Item 6, and 8.1.3 to reflect recent QA changes. ~y 3
.c.r pw 8.4 - Revised to reflect recent QA changes. Added 8.4.4 - '"' W, M
..0' 1..p-+.m
" Disposition of Documents - Electric Operations." gj@)
n.' .
- 4. .
; a; m e: :
l.j.
- 10. On 2/1/74, Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the EPP P&P ,$l
@]:ty , ~
'? were revised to add control of elevations, to make minor revis ons&' ; -> in Section 2, to add specifications responsibilities for GPM and. , to add special procedures relating to procurement of turbine j' i generators, steam generators and NSSS. _ a l
. .1
&lc/ -
- 11. On 4/15/74, Sections 1, 2, 3 and 8 of the EPP P&P 1 .- '
were revised to modify distribution of Deviation Request Form to ' provide.for separate filing of Document Transmittal forms', to
-yI
. revise document review responsibilities, to enlarge upon design , ,
guide responsibilities within Engineering Services and to enlarge 1
- . .l upon engineering review responsibilities within Engineering e
)
l
- Services and the Projects, and enlarge Section 8 - Records to * , 6 establish responsibility and identification Fequirements , ,. S xsn for documents.
F
~
. . [
,p s ,
-m ?. 3.p ,
h}' ;
.;>c"s O * * ,[ " h *
- d' 1.I[' .
1 g .. 3lx = ' :, [ ., L. .', t , ? ,..,,
.,( ,. - . ~ . . . , - ~
- .& r ., 9* W
'(_
9L Y ' );' < . , 1 .D.N ^ l $',y y; ,
, ^[O < t :- Y .b dbN<,Mkki_[b
*: ' j;&[ g 3 ' L 97 y 9-i v g .. - : ;;;g. ..;,,y ;~L :Q ~.f)gg[
"f' Q ,, ? !. ; L. .'*.: a '; h N ,
- Gk '* N (
', ,qjn, fd %i,, 'QWPd
;(
c *
,: ; Mw% .
9.:g._ ..L. f;p
- g. , , ..;7 1 'p e" M ' < e
" [ ,',
i
, f fQ
~
~f':-72* ', -> ' '
.m
% .J:
+-
. . u..,
4;g--
~
- , . & y. 43 '
- - C.. Implementing Type Prccedures . ~T:'
~
. .. - ', l
- 1. On 12/73/73, Procedures 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,-7, 8, 9, 10
. 4@ ~ '
l T and 11 were issued as the Project QA Services Procedures Manual
.- :W l (PQASD PM). This was the initial issue and took the place of , [' l .
the QA Audit Manual. . .
- ,;4W t ,'
j
, ' .i.'s A
, 2. On 2/4/74, Procedures 4, 12, 13 and 14 were issued n:: ,
to the PQASD PM. This was the initial issue of these procedures
'.: . g ,
and on 12, 13 and 14 resulted from the recognition that more -
-Vl c_n :-
detailed procedural type guidance was necessary. l i,M517 '
- ~
e f :p u p ;.1 ',a ,
, s
- 3. On 2/19/74, Attachments 8-1, 8-2 and 9-1 to PQASD ^ l R
9:a. PM were modified for clarity. In addition, Sheet 2 of 2 of ,G'. . _g General Weld Review Forms in Procedure 10 was added.
'4,
- Sy 8
, fi)# ;
$3M
. 4. . Onl2/20/74, Sheet 1 of 6 in Procedure 4 of
'9. %.1 PQASD PM was modified to place the responsibility on the J ,
# n, ,
, Field QA Engineer for preparing and approving the Master ,
;~
Inspection Plans. - w
'5 . On 2/27/74, Attachment 3.4 was removed from the PQASD PM since the training check-off forms used do not have to-be a part of the manual, but instead will be retained in the
" forms' file cabinet drawer" and '4
#.e individuals' Personal
- Qualification Records File, g
.t
~
6. On 3/15/74, Procedures 1-10, 12 (Sheet 6 of 6) , ^ and. Procedure 15 to PQASD PM were modified b,ased upon comments
<q s s ,
- 4
$ ,. ,,.^' '
, f[ , *[+'. ;o *4j$ ,a .
, , , , [-
-a
. . ,/
~ ,
.w .." :yi,gn.r u =
- a. w: , v- .. , , p:, . ;., ::
= - -
- - , ;;;; gg;3
,: .." g . ;,, :y - .;p; ;; j; sq,q.q;a,y.
, e< y ;q~3 n , ,
(, ... :~. :.3g ; . .,.. lg ..y.. . . , . .. _, 2: *
,' x;>;_: ^qa 3 ;. ,q .; ;.;;&,' , ~- h - .~s: '. .;M _.% ~
- .:,,; y _ _
3, ; - a, ' , , .b , . . _ up, ] g,yy;; J _ _73_ R-gj - . e- s , ,
, + -
e .
~
'g, [,. ' i:, -
. ' 9;i; 7 creceived from PQASD personnel who had been using the procedures m - x,
!for approximately three months." .
. L ..i. :m,.,\
,1 , j; , ." yE)
'. *y 7 :t
, It.is.the responsibility of Consumers QA Services ,
,,i w,m, aw
-to,aud't i' that all procedures are being followed and this ,~ g
.q ,'s
"*/
~ includes changes to the procedures. Audits are conducted 4
- A
, n ac by-General Office and Field QA Services Personnel on the ' .~.- g .nf Projects'to.see that they are following the EPP P&P and Projects [
2%, Procedures Manuals. Audits are conducted by General Office ff
< We <
and Field QA Services Personnel to see that the overall WW
#g ; m ;G; Lb y;4;n
*4,.,-.
Consumers Power QA Program is being implemented. General [n.V:@$ s u n. T $ :rff Office Personnel from QA Services conduct supervisory visits , , f-d/
, e: m to assure that site QA personnel are following procedures.
'~~g s . - . . .
# 'rd [(v )
, copies of these documents are available for inspection and ^%
. m l3;f review at Consumers corporate headquarters in Jackson, Michigan.,i ..
, x
~ '
The persons preparing the answer to this interrogatory are as follows: a Messrs. Harvey W. Slager , J Gilbert S. Keeley -a ; Consumers Power Company -
, l 1945 Parnall Road '
.. . l Jackson, Michigan 49201 .
}n l Michael I. Miller, Esq. ' A Isham, Lincoln & Beale -
^
One First National Plaza - V' Suite 4200 ' Chicago, Illinois 60670 C e Y - v "9M
. 1
- c -
_ g 'e: ,,
.- ~ n p e 43 '
g : .- r _., aQ.:q< 4f:i, x. , ';g. h a. . ~
. . . x, .& - w
, . " f Q , 'a;_a:# %
< s s
+
*h", ..s.
a _. _ s ._.
~ _ , y
-4
--' o,m ,e m
. . .-.4 --
~-
-n. .,;
.-;. - ;.jh v , - - . . . . , ,
, y,g yl '
7 .
,. , ;-- : e. ;
- s
?+: .~ u ;- ;;
-%_,. 2., .,-
' K, g.'7s ; '
g q 1
~
- n. . ,. ,
t . . 4 g _;g
,.. , w ,
" '; * ' . ~ ;.py- -j ,
~~7' ,
, + ; ,c
, , , , e If,* ' f.,$p[~,
l - ,
, .. r. . w. -
+ .
- ,,,2, b- j 4
# 5
~~
, - , . m . m. . ..
- 'n.u.: ..;
; % 2;
, - :- ~-y.,
~
- INTERROGATORY 26. With respect to each inspection u.? C '
;yy '
report of the Atomic Energy Commission regarding the Midland .,
,W *
\
r .
. - D 3 /,
4 ' Facility,. state what, if anything, you did in your Quality J.
' Assurance and Quality control Procedures for Midland as a' direct
. . 213l l
, mce.m result of each such inspection report.
G; w ' , !
.. M
. 3;:_ g m_.
. . #. e. s
' ANSWER: Inspection Reports of the AEC regarding the ~l "
. s.g Midland Facility are identified below toget.hcr with the action
_ a m._.- [f,
?, h ,. .
taken-by. Consumers Power Company, if any, in regard.to Quality -, ' Q.# q;;p , Pssurance and Quality Control Procedures for Midland as a direct ' '.3" l 4.. % : h;ME' result of each such inspection report. ' M w -:
+ .gn . a ; .
~ e;g ,
70-1. January 14, 1970 Inspection at Jackson, Michigan _ , _ , performed by G. Fiorelli and G. Gower. Q .7 -
- ' ;.#( >/ N: g
. y 3
'Io Ait The purpose'of this meeting was to inform Consumers ' Mfy
. ~ g.: L).J l .
of the purpose, secpe and organization of a forthcoming intensive m., J
, ,..m. ,
.QA review of our QA Program for the Midland Project. There were ~
no findings and no action was required on the part of Consumers. q: ' 70-2. March 10, 11 and 12, 1970 Inspection at Jackson,
.A Michigan performed by G. Fiorelli, G. Gower and F. Dreher.
y
- . The purpose of this inspection was to conduct an initial Quality Assurance
- nspection in connection with the Midland Project
~
and covered both the extent of compliance with the. commitments noted in the application and the extent to which the proposed
* ~
e l Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 had been implemented.._ g i a a a
~
l 6 ,
'% 8 "\M f - , Ib a.
+ r , -
j.,,,,. gt .,g - ,q-
'L im,. ~
+ r ,
Y '
'~,'""
+
at^ -Y* -v * , 0
, , ,O , .
ll6-$2
~
, + .
% .; i s , ? . ?,
}
^^'
u .. g'- ^
-s ..; ; y;.;('p Q
. , s. v; M , *;
. : -- n..a r.=:4h ;
'Y~ , N c .. . , . , < ' '.
~,
c .- ;: a T ,.
- - s . ,s; l'h0l '*.?.:
e1 l f' w p.p% l
.a .-
r ;-.y ..? :, f
- mm 1 ,4 1
, i ;. ; p, a . v eq
, r , 7'; - ,j
.s...,,
Consumers'-action on deficiencies noted during that , 4;
.;3 -
inspection were as follows: <s ,.7 ,
,'s
- t ,. ,,
. .w,
- a. The QA Program did not meet the intent of all
~~
w u ,, ,y "of the criteria at that time since some of the QA "[' .. 1,,v::W: . n .
.- Manual Implementing Procedures.were still in the P 1:;. :'.
development stage and had not been completed . M.. (Criterion 2). , ;" 'l3
. The organization and document control sections of the manual were planned for t.F
, completion in 1 month. The Field QC Procedures were %,, O m., &' , e tt '
.. . :;u to be converted and up-graded from the Palisades yi i
Project within 3 months at the time of this inspac- y?M;e;
- . .; . ..wt, tion. Subsequent to the inspection, these procedures .. n,,
s.*r .ns zh were completed as planned. -
- 13:< e ,, o
. .,: e to j wg * *
~'
b.. Internal Design Review checklists were developed -
~ . . .'g subsequent to some of the early Consumers design reviews.
-y (Criterion 3) ,
f Our procedure E-1 Engineering Reference List for re- , viewing documents was prepared to establish a reference
- list which could be used during review of Q-List Documents, such as Specifications, Requisitions 1.F.d ,'s Purchase Orders. - 's
- ,4 I
- c. Implementation of Procurement Document Control was :
found to include the elements of Criterion 4/ however, - the procedures describing this sytem were not yet written. 4 . e _ j
+
. " ?
p,l , . k J % g . %
'- ..; ok, j , ;_ . _, w
% ,4 '
e . jJl L i. . ,, ? @
-~' ,_: . ?. -i -,
~~' *
~' *W
~ .:, 4%
.: q,.
.. c 4 ,
L,.~ : 7 -; .
- -.y x .7ay; 3
.,. e fc .. ,
..c ,
~
- 1.
- M .7
~
_ ;n ',' N$ 4;z;~
, 1 ;.
- +
s , 4 Procedure DOC-1 QA Document Control, was established . . . l 1 for procuring, distr'ibuting, reviewing and filing a-QA Documents prepared by Consumers, the Architecc- J/[ '
, Engineer, the Nuclear NSS Supplier and other vendors. ;* L a ,
. 1. ? l Subsequently, a document transmittal form was established ,
x y:
~
and is still in use and is. presently covered by the
+,M
;y' ..
Midland Project Procedures Manual, Paragraph 3.1.3, _fcir '
.nX ;
Document Review System. . - . . _ . x
'l y ;
xn. The implemented practices for procurement document <g4l
- 7 ,
control at Consumers were considered to be in accordance ,.W q with QA Criterion 4, except procedures had not been - . gw. W, completely written which described the Document Control
. c: m Process being used. 'y.jf
. g+:
+ 9
- d. The procedures describing the practices being ;
m used for Document Control were not completed (Criterion 6). The system being implemented by Con'sumers was con-sidered to be in accordance with Criterion 6, except
./
that the process had not been completely documented in' procedure form. . Subsequent to this inspection, consumers initiated the-
~
"c"
~
Document Control System described under above which is still in use. 7
- e. A procedure had not been prepared for use in auditing special processes for construction.~ The system being.
implemented on the Palisades Project and planned for use
. 4 3 h
* 'i + y i g. e B
** Y A 9 ., - , ,
,s'
'l _ f_ * ,
t .
>.e *4 e
- [.e, 5 3
. - _.._.; _ , + u ; ..a - 34 s _
E
~
~ '
. . - r
.. -e
~ .y.
.., .n. .' e .
.n. .
.:l.:+
a ~~~.
~ m, m +y (.?..y M g h..c f
=
. ,,. :q; ,
; qg 3.; -' , ^ * ,.p. ~
g.Q s
~_
q
, , , . .. g w .; s-
,;- yv,y
-.g; ;3.', e _ --
, ,_~ ' , !(;;;;;c;w. ;
m y;myw g ; g;y ;,r > 2 , , . o s: yy,;gg
'm .uq,'. _
_77
, T, " m 4 m
.yy
. m.g.
n4-
.w < - . , -
u @,; - [ Lon Midland required expansion and conversion for , 2 $. .. w
,#4":.
r ps
,use on the Midland Project (Criterion 9).
t V (O g: . _ 'x %: Field Inspection procedures were subsequently up graded.
*~
andLidentified'for use specifically on the Midland ,[. a.a :.
. _: g[U h.~
-Project. These were issued in.a Field Audit and %p. C3
- . gm
~
a dTI6. 7 Inspection Procedures Manual in August of 1970. # Q<
,.i.,
.+Q m
~f.
. %m Procedures regarding the inspection of test--control . . .. c
, r:m
, M 's 1 x had not been completed. (Criterion 11) . , d$.56..,.
- sa OWnNA '
T JQ; tin:4 In process and construction test control requirements a
- h W W" W
. m .n are covered either by specifications or procedures which y' are reviewed and approved by Consumers. Pre- bdM'
.a.Pam@%:;
'M .
operational and functional test procedures are,preparedEN 4 prior to such tests in accordance with procedures
%%QA.$t l h,ML..;m
~m, s ~.
y developed by ou'r Construction Services Department or h
~
ysm Bulk Power Operations Group. . 16, [.d>
.t y Audit Procedures to determine contractor compliance v.
g.-
~
,:~ ^
T to the Criterion regarding calibration of measurement and test equipment (Criterion 12) had not been completed. i
, 1 1 -
The following procedures were subsequently developed . . . _ l . .e ..' _for auditing.this AEC Criterion. Field Procedure FI-100 j{ j
.FQAE Audit and/or Inspections / General. General Offa.ce
~
r;) l Procedure SI-l QAE Audits and/or Inspections / General. j .) C
.h. Implementing. procedures to be used at the construction l- .
e
- A
- site to audit conformance to the. handling, storage,.
l
,2. . . ,..-
4
.' .h'"' " , . - "* 4 %f
~
' -y;i[ Y-
?
u v.. - - ,
.i n
- I 4- '
b h ?,
,M. ..f'*d[' y , :qf b;}[u.; ~y _
~;> , g yg.C y ,o' ,. 'i@& i& l
+ :...
; _ D. m. , , L 7
; _ , .: t . ::6a ;: : gy
'~1i'}}.; .p f ' y $.
,. . f ' ,, M.OM Q.; , .j'[ / , . < y;. .. ,
% :.n g gw-nn x .; , ; -
~.c-x A; i :
s. 7-2 4 v t. , ...,_78- . .
. ,~ x 'M. *.' T M y vA< W .. q.
z.. m m y <
- 'o e b
; y; . ,f x
\
g-o , [af;9
- i 4 k4; - .;p' u.
shipping asd preservation criterion (Criterion 13)
.'.p y'?",
had ~ not ' . n completed.' The consumers draft procedure l s
. . - . .- i had non yee received internal approval at the time this , ,
u,
,AEC Inspection. Field Procedure FI-103 Site Storage and }
- 4 Housekeeping and General Office Procedure SI-l were B.- f 1 subsequently approved and issued for use. > - ,
[.' W .'
- i. The audit procedure to determine Contractor Con-: l .'
e ., ;n, formance to tihe Inspection, Test and Operating Status ,
' ?
;u-Criterion (Criterion 14) was in the development stage and,[%[
~
.. _ , ,a had not yet been completed.
]QME',
f , Field Procedure FI-100 and General Office Procedure SI-l _ n
..L n; were subsequently issued for auditing this criterion.
]4 :w ;;
- j. Procedures had not been established to audit ,_
- 4n.
Bechtel's compl'iance to the Criterion regarding non- [ a .. conforming materials, parts and components at the construction site. Adequate procedures existed for - auditing vendors in this regard. Consumers planned to adapt these 'for use at the construction site. (Criterion 15) 4 70-3. April 7, 1970 Inspection at Jackson, Michigan by
--G. Fiorelli. The purpose-of this inspection was to inform Consumers Corporate Management and the Key Project Personnel of the findings resulting 'from the initial QA Inspection which was conducted on -
~
~~
March 10,-11,.and 12, 1970. . . y _' y / / f y*> [as -
'W ,
- w, .
- - y, ,
#~
.w + lt ~ '
Sf,'f;h C' h Q ._ < J ; **9 ,
- J ~;: ~
~ *: ;_.,',; u;;.. ->. - . , _l ,
- /,j - e'( ' '.i; 1 ~l'{, . /,
q ( ,, - .: i. ',;
-..c w, .,- x,~
97.;., ,. g. 9.. 3;- :+: pq wrq ~ .. w : -
-yg
'. s '.
.;/@'. ~N. . %.. :,g@.g 3:m ;iM,'PV-%y
/
tc m. _ j ; f*&& [ ,.
. LC ~ , p.; y.;j ,;f
,c-
; 79 - .,
- o.; , : q,jpgj3
+
;; . , L 7 w , _,
(, , 7.gg
.W ; ., - ' ' , mih 70-4. May 1, 1970 Inspection at the Midland Site by
. ][ . , -
' m "y G. Gower. ~ The purpose of thiis inspection was to: (a)' Review ,
~
.M both Consumers' and Bechtel's plans for site QA/QC activities, j
7 u :v.,' 4 .: (b) determine extent of the implementation, (c) review wod
'f M
./. m:.M
' performance and wC Procedures and record keeping practices, (d) -
N
, y:; 3 . -
determine the status of excavation efforts. Y @#li4 ,m
.;[q?;
There were no deficiencies resulting from this inspec- ,a i
..,4 re; tion and no Consumers action regarding procedures. '
Q: N K 7j&:t
~
70-5. June 26, 1970 Inspection at Midland Site by . QM9
?'
qv:\ Z6 G. Gower. The purpose of this inspection was to inspect the -YCjf adequacy of the applicants QA Program and Site Staffing, to control ""
,: n:
work proposed under an exemption requested on May 28, 1970. . There.[ ay 9 were no findings requir'ing, modifications to our procedures asLa""IMg s #q, m. ..p result of this inspection. .
' {:y" . . .
. y.m 70-6. September 29, 30, and October 1, 1970 Inspection at the Midland Site by G. Gower. Inspection findings included the following: Improper use of vibrators during the placement 1.
ya 4.; of concrete.
-l h . <-
As a result: (a) Bechtel's Engineering Department .. . established a procedure for reviewing in advance construction
. 3, placement plans for critical concrete pours; (b) Training sessions ,
were instituted to assure that laborers received instructions in , s l . proper.. vibration procedures and techniques; (c) Quality Control - i Surveillance by Bechtel was up graded by the addition of a
- m. .
l \ placement. engineer.in-addition to the concrete engineer; and (d)
.--~
r - . . ~. O
, , 8 L. , _ , ,L -
+
s'
- Aj y}
. ._ ., ~ ~'[
~.
.-f
. .. ~. -
g - .. a y
~ /
f::f
. ,~ w. -.
.~ n ~~
- g- w ;
g.- wp q - . m. ;n u
. ,, f-- , _y:S~1.e-ys :hgg
,, ; - , ; " - ., _- < w? , u p: . u .n: <> ~ j :
g;;;, m.m
..: n. - .,.#.,
c.- , x c <
.- ;~ s: ,. : . - .w .n
, .m , . . . s, . .
m, 7 3 7.,%
* ' ' ^
.:{ lWQ : * .y; .
^
' l ' l, ,, ,
l ffg{'j' l
, w ..
..g m y
'a
- q,f:r. ,e : *:) ,
1 7 ,
, ;: y +
1 - m :, Consumers Field Personnel were instructed to provide increased 1
.. . m.
,. surveillance during critical concrete pours to insure compliance .
~ .
g ; with established requirements.
>. ,. f; s . , .A '
i
~
lp f 9 ' *
- 2. The Site testing laboratory was not taking aggregateq [ _
gradation and organic tests at the frequ,encies stated in the PSAR.' ]' n . a:
-)f t " S . '~
p Prior to this AEC Inspection, tests were made les_s_ fre- Q 8:9. - quently for non-critical concrete than for. critical concr_ete pours,E.A mu
.#'V but to alleviate the possibility of confusing critical with non A
~;Qg.s-A
.- w..adM
- a,y p critical testing, this practice was discontinued and all tests are .1 to be performed as for critical concrete. - m 2:&
ww$h w.a Mk%pn-
- 3. The concrete sample obtained for the slump test , \J '
v..n,z at the point of transit truck discharge was ' not taken in accordance C,
. u aw . -
w with the sampling instruction in ASTM-C-172 which require a. .repre- Z,9J
. _gw sentative sample. i .
dhi
. . g l
,- W;yp i Bechtel was requested to provide the necessary documenta- -
)
^ . \
tion and Consumers Field Personnel were instructed to conduct *i
. 4 - ;
audits to insure that the required documentation was being recorded.
~
)
~ -
.a !
- 4. The QA and QC' Inspection Personnel present at the .
- concrete pour; location did not promptly identify and correct :
i p apparent deviations from the ACI-301 itandard regarding consolida _ 1
. m : ,. . .is.
. tion of concrete.
- ag f
4 g 1 a .
- Training Sessions were instituted to insure that .
laborers received instructions in proper vibration procedures and , ' ,
.. n
' techniques. . ,
. _ ,1
. - .g .
1- ,N. ic..< s
,d-+. 3 9 ; N,
.,;ug;
,-f). ~%. ,
- i } .' t , . .
3s y j ,Gayy
.y .M- a&
- M ' &x-~
- 9 -
*, U,~_syy W 3 ._lF'O~ W ,P-
- T ' # - L
^
- s .: - , en
,,.,v. w y,x w:1,; v as.
... 7 n . .. n. . ,
w
;; _ m ,: _:pw gg.
Q.f p ; vl .vn ,5,g ,,g , ~ ,
^ L:(m .
y 4;9%fyM ; 3
# +: w g g ygge;
.. yI 3 , ,M . . . .f.- ~~ .' : 2 (Qfbr
~ ~ "
Ti;
,- ., y. . ' : .u , 2 - < -
r ., - ; , , . '
. g _ .; ;/ - - .A_ m:g @
7,. ,
+ ;,,
~
,u, - <_..r, ,
v 2 >
- .m 4
,q s y,l - !
.. L
+ <
, 7b. ;q Q
- 5' . Bechtel's concrete specification 7220-C-31 does - ~
d 19 6 , .. not agree with ACI-301 regarding'. slump and strength testing. ,lp This procedural conflict was eliminated. " 9 X. ..a..:1 - . s
, *m* .* fq , _
.v ,
L-t$;. ..y
- 6. The system for controlling the specification limits l
,2 nu . . :
^
on concrete transit time appear to require more definite documenta ,,,,, - V - i tion.- . _ d,g l gm
. _ ...--- . r q "f.jy Procedures were instituted to assure that time _ require- ; .
~ --
-,. t .,
G, ments were being met and that the time date was being recorded. g;g.) J &;W;r
. y,s
- 7. In two locations where forms had been removed from .- ~ n
. g.hl $
a portion of the auxilliary building base slab, there~was evidence;,.. - 1 Of. of non-consolidation of concrete. '
- Of.M
% b;
, m a y,r;m TrainingSessionswereinstitutedtoassurethatlaborerS
.. : A8 received instructions in, proper vibration procedures and techniques.
The surveillance effort by Bechtel and consumers was increased. T 1971 INSPECTIONS ~2 x ,% eu^ 71-1. January 7, 1971 Inspection at the Midland Site , i by G. Gower and R. Oller. The purpose of this,special inspection was to review the measures taken to p'rotect material, equipment _ , l and foundation' structures during a temporary construction shut-down period. .' -
. ~
There were no significant items found during this , inspection and no changes were made to our procedures. .
/'
~! ^
- s. .
e~ ~ 4, Q . ' {f.;)
~~l r '
; l, , . ,
* +
. ~. o .$ - *[,
V .y: z . VM r e' . P
~
m
'L.
, f~.'
'V s
% +
c' '4T;, ,
.1 W, Si * * '
,s - ,, ; C'
.g s;'.
_._.:....a , . . . -
=" -y y. _ q. ,. w
-g
,c m 1c,.
^.
y : :.n *..
- g:. -
w .. e , ,y.7 w , r, . * . y.,[ ' , ..:.y' G ~muf. *;
. 1, x; ;;&;. . . ~,
, p 'N'yf,; y.. y , _y: s
, -.*+
-- f
, ..7_. . '3
.h a; , . ;;* .jy :
", ,;[m .a ya. & ,. ._ ...:v.
e . y n ;m;Lgr . .-
.v .
~
2 : : .g
. w . y:= ,.,a f; m y.x.; .x.m p ~ . >.. -
,.:4;3
.~. ,-Li;2 ~ a ;yy .a...y
- v. px; , y-g -
. y. >
,.,.> ., g -...... , g,
_'5" " i, 7m
*f,- a s
* > [; * .,f
- i
~
. . .p
- and foundation structures. ,
M+p.
- q- .
= ;;g There'were no non-conformances or findings requiring procedural changes. . ,
72-2. August 28 to September 1, 1972 Inspections at Babcock E.Wilcox Facilities located in Barberton, Ohio, Mt. ,. Vernon, Indiana, by R. Brown and B. T. Resnick. 4 One finding concerned B & W Inspections of stored 1 s l assemblies. Their procedures required that inspections of J.'; i
.m stored assemblies were required to be conducted in accordance with their procedure 12-2QT-106, Rev. O. Inspections were being- .,
i \ ~
. conducted at 30-day intervals, but only docuninted on 90-day
{{
-intervals., The B & W procedure was revised i:o require documenta-
-3
.]
- m. , .
tion of'the 30-day; inspections * - % J_
- ^
.. -, e n :,. x . 2 u m e
.g(. ,
Q N.I ygg
, < y , , s, <
,y fen;~. . u n m: ,y . ;'. , 2 : ,+. 3.:d? a %.* z,nm+ Jy
- g. DSCMP%
, 2. , ,. y . :
.; ;; g .w
%. a..~; m,;;'. ~j g.g:: e L u ^
o: M
- ' % ::,4?'.Q.:(?p b;mgw .mnWdy r q?1
; < r.
- < . .o y - w w a mn~ O p :,
}}Qggg1 g y p ;L y '4 if".}3 -
w ' '~
,,83_ , y ,
m- n-
. .- - yge)3 ,> yn;,. .
, L, .
. ~ _; , .
s . n, n# ,- < . ,. 1 5
,.. s.
n a,y,-c- '
.n m . :.r . 7*
. 4 4
> g; "4 4
m_ l6 , ' " l'j%g2 $
-1973 INSPECTIONS .
.~>c "
~w.J - , 9, W .a
;uy:w..j
. x.+ . a, , , m. ;
- x. _
73-1. February 23, 1973 Inspection at Jackson, Michigan,..,'
" ' ' "e .. 4 m. af ** as <' 1.
by.R. A. Rohrbacher and W. E. Vetter.
- NOMS v.we l~s-1 w
- ,, - >, f'3
> e ' + ,
,, -<?.: Q,
. ..vw.y a This was a special Coiporate Management Meeting during ' i,~ '
~~ ~ v. .
g-7py? which changes in AEC Rules and Regulations relative to Nuclear ~
- .; a .
. w w.
[, Plant Construction during the last two years, type and fre'quency y{nu ;..... .. . of _ RO:III Inspections, the intent and applicability of -the -l-8
~
^v M,3h k'-
criteria in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, and other items were re. - .f"4m2%./W '
;m MJ ftQ*%
viewed. . wede 7 .1 @m.m;
. 1..w
.-y
, MM,:- m1.
considerable discussion took place during this meeting w.g.i 7a ; m
,4(qp, i regarding the Consumers Quality Assurance Organization. The .
item was not resolved, but was deferred for further discussion ~~ W..n . . g.n
.M c -
,g%g y -
4 - pending the results of a Consumers review of this subject. Docu--[,^.~ w.. Q%j:: ments de3cribing updated ' organization structure -and- responsibility j a ;n a assignments were forwarded to-the AEC (W.E. Vetter) by Mr. Howell; ; e < on April 6, 1973 and included (a) Section II of the Electric Plant y s* Projects Policy and Procedures Manual, (b) Forward, Secti'on I and'h? ~ [ s
- t Section II of the Project Procedures Manual, Midland Project, .( c) '
a..~ Bechtel Organization Chart dated December, 1972. 8 4 s- , j e 73-2. Dated April 17, 1973. Inspection at Jackson, .v;"g[, W ;iQ'ji..}; Michigan by R. A. Rohrbacher and W. E. Vetter. ? - x ;a
. d' ,
This was a special Corporate Management Meeting and the 33 following topics were included in the meeting _ agenda: 9 c;: ; - s
. .w
~ * , ,
4
, 'e..-..., 1 e pg gm ,
i [[' 4.,n s % 7 6
,, I cs- ' fM/ %
4 ._ . C ' ,7 , f- ,
',TKc?h,g{f.p4
, . , , . 3. ,E 'k _
,' ' 4; '
O "- q t
- d'*
[[ 1 w/,; . . . Mh. . . .-.
fl {j;, .g.t {..g. 7./g [+.fgg;%: c [ e g:w Z,[Z . .: .- rp,u '[,{]e.v.. - ,n 7,. s ;, :g: w+:. gy+.:
, g.., ;
;n q
;4 r gg; g-
+..
.y,,w.: .w
- m -
47 4n. .;@4,g.
. m.
' m.ss%.;q
*Q V n .~ '- . c;y..,
n 4_ o y* l. y .z.. 3 _g, ,yg g}$ _
~..,... . X MQWi, i
. ;y .
u r ;., f. , ; ', . .
, n- ,' t
, g z - , ,
_,;.y ,. >
-r; ., '
l, e .. .g 1 . . ,c f m q' . _a.. Recent Consumers Organization changes relative to the ;
.i " '
'M Midland Construction Project. '
, .i
'y 1 .. .
gy .
- b. Organization Interface between Consumers and Bechtel. '
^
~v , ,
is., ; t
- c. Activities of B & W relative to 10 CFR Part 50, T Appendix B,-Criteria 7 and 15. -
.w :(;
yb 1.
.d. . Significance in mandatory aspects 'of- the March 26, m.[,y-; .
- w name- e ., , ' ,
1973 Memorandunt 'and order' of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal
- p '
Board. < '
?
~ MW .
7...Qe t .n.
- e. The consumers audit program for the Midland Project.
r _ .
' b, -
The Bechtel organization chart of the Midland Project 1, a -
. , swp was to be clarified and expanded as a result of this inspection. ' fi#
,. , x,,
*' a,
. :.s g, ip Also as a result of this inspection it was agreed 9
- m that a more comprehensive audit schedule was to be prepared. M This was done and a copy transmitted to the Region III Office. F 3
73-3. May 24-25, 1973 Inspection at the B & W facilities ds in Barberton, Ohio by T. E. Vandel. This was a licensee vendor
~
audit surveillance inspection. -
.There were no items identified during this inspection l . requiring changes to our procedures. .-
- x.
t . . June 14 and 15, 1973 Inspection at B & W_ [ 73-4. , I ~ facilities in. Mount Vernon, Indiana by T. E. Vandel. This was . a, licensee-vendor audit surveillance inspection. - " h a , .. .. e se am ewA W ~,, ' ? ? . '* *
' +
% . i-; , ..;- ;' .
, +
.. y .9 e'* , 5-I
. - %: W.v4
,,',i ,*# Nt *. ' 4y]*;N f.ki$.} v,,.
- =-
-Es.. . ,
,[',, Y.; P
+
- h. g e'
[.
} Q"y *,'f ' ,I][ Wyl}, I
, (
.f*d { [**h O3['$h l _
_ ,; & _'- y, */ ? ; , Q ? ;- _ _ ,
_ ,; "', ,. ,.- e c>fA g y. - ' q; ' a g. f., ;.3%;g ,
. ;l~ - l inlf;l,: q: .. 'lRt l %c , % j d Q . ..) ..:.i ..; ( g's.,. , . 'a ,%l,s'MQ Q.m$Q,
.~.,: ,.
.; . , . , . ' c s. p n: &. n;a-W:i;- -- o";
.g y.r.m
- y. ;. , ::;
,+,
gggy ye :r
- c; .r ;
g .d_ .: g;g
=
. . , g5-1 . . .
..,- n 7-a
?
x
,y c ; ,
y~ , ,,x
~ . v.
g ,p . _. ,. m s g .
. ., . ' ,;. . . -g :.. . '-7 1,
44 . , , There were no violations of AEC requirementa nor-
..f l
n y 29 " unusual occurrences identified during this inspection and no )
. u 1 changes'were made to ourl procedures. j. l' 9 , . l
\.k I
' . .s l'73-5. June 26-28, 1973 Inspection at the Midland .
Y
,m. c Site by R. A. Rohrbacher and C. M. Erb. .This was a special Q'a z
. . announced audit covering re-start of construction. ~.N,
- .;. .M ,:
, ;< y.
., 7,9 There were no violations resulting from this,inspec-3[yt tion and -no changes required to our procedures.
pg p.<yg
, r :( ;
l ?. .. 73-6. . July 23-26 and August 8-10,- 1973 Inspection ~ -fn;
. . a p ;-
at the Midland Site by R. A. Rohrbacher, T. E. Vandel, D. W. ;)
*p gW j Hayes and W. E.'Vetter. '1 .
-ng Q
, .:.sm:
The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate the iy r f
- p ?.n .. ~
Consumers Quality Assurance Program for the Midland Project as E x
~ ~ ,
documented in the Consumers QAM relative to the rehtirements of g 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. ,
^[
There were no non-conformances or unusual occurrences .
' +
identified as a result of this inspection. However, comparison , of the Midland Project Quality Assurance Manual with the require-ments of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B revealed that certain detailed - , requirements were not included, were not consistent with, or , e. were not sufficiently explicit in the Quality Assurance Manual. As a result, a Quality Assurance Manual containing the Quality , Assurance Program for the Midland Project was._ revised to resolve
- these discrepancies.. Revisions were also started in the Project l
~ . , l Erocedures Manual for the Midland Project. . %..%l
. ;;:.w .po; ;
s i.
' ' '.. ~
^,.A.
_ . . ". ,3
-~ 3
.. .o ,
w
1 -
. .. . ,a _% ~ <. # m a m w
,.n vn n::. 4.x - s;y w~r imp 4;,;
, - + '; y .
. n+ - , n.
.:g y .Q' * * - - ?Q
{.;*;g Nm v%; ; 3:q;9Dg 7 - %;c.33pm g s: m ,
* -L ...
-- ',, u, f , _k,L. v ~itf es .';a _,. .. .;;;- ~
E v ,.L'; '3.~p ._*n Mp x :_.r fM; ,: $mw ^. +; % ecy . r
~
- = ~;- qu;-fG% Of : ,: ~86- .
, , ' &~ ,.:; Q M "a wQ 3-~: v.;q W :
a . +
, p- ; ., :. , :; ;
- > c:~, .,
1
.e .g ,9 . c 1
- ; .r.p , .
~~
, g .
a . y;g. . . L Another' item resolved during the course of this 'nspec ' ' - s. as
- a+ ,,.
tion'was the Bechtel Organization Chart for Field Quality
~
',y ,
.m
.A Revised Bechtel Organization Chart for Control' Activities. - 4
. .-- ; n
- the Midla,nd Project dated ~ August 1, 1973 was issued and indicated that '
~A p+yu the reporting level of the Quality Assurance Manager was at the, ,['
same' level as the Manager of Division Construction. ,
' 4:q C. ,7, %p 73-7. September 5-7, 1973 inspect-lon at the Midland
--}}