ML091200011

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:41, 11 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review for TACs ME0900 & ME0901 - Salem Units 1 and 2 - Revise Definition of Fully Withdrawn
ML091200011
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2009
From: Richard Ennis
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Keenan J
Public Service Enterprise Group
Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420
References
TAC ME0900, TAC ME0901
Download: ML091200011 (2)


Text

From: Rick Ennis Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:22 AM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Marshall David; Karl Feintuch; Joshua Miller; Paul Duke

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME0900 & ME0901 - Salem Units 1 and 2 - Revise Definition of Fully Withdrawn Jeff, By letter dated March 22, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090920406), PSEG Nuclear LLC submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would revise the definition of the fully withdrawn position of the Rod Cluster Control Assemblies (RCCA) to minimize localized RCCA wear. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff

=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.

Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (3D27D29AB75BCD4BAE913B63CBFBBEDFDC7EB8012B)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME0900 & ME0901 - Salem Units 1 and 2 - Revise Definition of Fully Withdrawn

Sent Date: 04/30/2009 7:22:25 AM Received Date: 04/30/2009 7:22:25 AM From: Rick Ennis

Created By: Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov

Recipients:

Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)

Tracking Status: None Marshall.David@nrc.gov (Marshall David)

Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Karl Feintuch)

Tracking Status: None Joshua.Miller@nrc.gov (Joshua Miller)

Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)

Tracking Status: None

Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time

MESSAGE 13241 04/30/2009

Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False

Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: