ML18139B902

Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-32 & DPR-37,proposing Change to Tech Spec 6.7(A) Extending Deadline for Environ Qualification of All safety-related Electrical Equipment to End of Second Refueling Outage After 820331

ML18139B902
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	06/16/1982
From:	Leasburg R VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	Harold Denton, Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18139B903	List: ML18139B902 ML18139B904
References
355, NUDOCS 8206240344
Download: ML18139B902 (4)

Text

---

e a VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND,, VIRGINIA 23261 R.H.LEASBURG VICE PRESIDENT June 16, 1982 NucLEA.R OPERATIONS Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 355 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NO/GSS:ddp Attn: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Docket Nos. 50-280 Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 50-281 Division of Licensing License Nos. DPR-32 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DPR-37 Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSE DPR-32 AND DPR-37 SURRY POWER STATION UNITS NO. 1 & 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE Pursuant to 10CFR50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests an Amendment, in the form of changes to the Technical Specifications, to Operating License DPR-32 and DPR-37 for the Surry Power Station, Units No. 1

& 2. The proposed changes are enclosed.

The proposed change is to revise specification 6.7(A) Environmental Qualifi-cations, to extend the deadline for the Environmental Qualification of all safety related electrical equipment to the end of the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982.

Surry Power Station Units 1 & 2 Technical Specifications 6.7(A) currently states the deadline of June 30, 1982 for the Environmental Qualification of all safety related electrical equipment. The extended deadline is according to the Proposed Rule 10CFR50.49(h) dated January 15, 1982.

Prior to issuance of the Operating License for Surry Power Station the Commission made favorable findings regarding compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements, including equipment qualification. Now, the main issue is regarding appropriate documentation for environmental qualification of Class lE equipment.

The NRC staff issued a Safety Evaluation Report for Surry setting forth the results of its analysis of Vepco's Submittals on the env:i,,r:onmental qualification of Class lE equipment. In the SER, the NRC staff listed several issues not having satisfactory documentation for environmental qualification. There was some disagreement between Vepco and the staff on the interpretation of the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 regarding the items listed in the SER. However, despite the unsettled technical positions, the SER did not contain any item which neeeded corrective action for the safe operation of the plant.

--- ,., *- -

w/cJe,,fr:

8206240344 820616 PDR.ADOCK 05000280

P= -PDR .: / Y'loo.oo

-

VIROINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY TO e

Mr. Harold R. Denton Vepco has been working to resolve all environmental qualification issues for Class lE equipment and is proceeding on an orderly schedule to provide adequate documentation or replace equipment. The schedule is based upon realistic assessments of equipment availability, procurement times, and plant refueling cycles.

The continued operation of Surry pending resolution of the environmental qualification matter is justified based upon Vepco's responses dated August 24, 1981 to the staff's Equipment Evaluation Reports dated May 21, 1981, and upon the results reflected in the SER. Thus the interim operation of Surry Power Station does not pose any danger to the safety of the plant or any threat to public health.

The requested change has been reviewed and approved by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee and the Safety Evaluation and Control Staff.

It has been determined that this request does not involve an unreviewed safety question.

We have evaluated this request in accordance with the criteria in 10CFR170.22 and it has been determined that a Class III license amendment fee is required. A voucher check in the amount of $4,400 is enclosed in payment of the required fee.

Very truly yours, Attachments:

Proposed Technical Specification Change Voucher Check No. 30299 for $4,400 cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator Region II

- e COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA)

)

CITY OF RICHMOND )

The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the City and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by R.H. Leasburg, who is Vice President-Nuclear Operations, of the Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document _in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

-cL Acknowledged before me this / /o day of ~ , 19 "y .;;i...

• My Commission expires: ,,x - ~ (,,, , 19 ~_::--.

Notary Public (SEAL)

I

('

(10-80)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1. FEE FORM TYPE (Check one}

REACTOR FACILITY FEE DETERMINATION INSTRUCTIONS. Fill-in items 1 through 14, as applicable, and send the original copy to the License Fee Management Branch.

., 3. ACCESSION NUMBER

4. LICENSEE t2.°'24-~34(-

VePco

5. PLANT NAME AND UNIT(S) s u f?.Q 7. FEE REMITIED 8. LICENSEE FEE DETERMINATION C:LASSII CLASSY CLASS VI EXEMPT NONE e ~v, ~ OIJ Mel..ff'A t-SUBJECT

~c)At /PICA11 oAJ

10. TAC NUMBER ASSIGNED(/( available}

A/11.lt:E

11. APPROVAL DATE OF ISSUANCE LETIER ORDER AMENDMENT NUMBER(S)

12. NRG FEE DETERMINATION The above application has been reviewed in accordance with Section 170.22 of Part 170 and is properly categorized.

The above application has been reviewed in accordance with Section 170.22 of Part 170 and is incorrectly classified.

Fee should be class(es):

• n and is exempt from fees because ii is:

Filed by a Government agency and is not for a power reactor.

For a Class I, II, or Ill amendment which results from an NRG request dated for the application and the amendment is to simplify or clarify License or Technical Specifications; has only minor safety significance; and is being issued for the convenience of NRG (must meet all of the criteria).

Other (State reason therefor)

. v'* ~:,. ......i*,.

• • • • • • -~-

' '

/L+ ..... *.

ENT BRANCH USE ONLY (All others do not write below this line)

DATE l

DISTRIBUTION BY LFMB DL Branch Chief LFMB Exemption File LFMB Reactor File

,.,/.i