ML18045A804
| ML18045A804 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1980 |
| From: | BIELAWSKI A P CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.), ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8010210532 | |
| Download: ML18045A804 (34) | |
Text
. )_ .... ** UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW In the Matter _of: CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Palisades Nuclear Power Facility)
Docket No. 50-255 License No. DPR-20 (IP ocr&o CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE NRC STAFF'S SECOND ROUND OF INTERROGATORIES AND DOCUMENT REQUESTS Consumers Power Company hereby submits its res-ponses to the "NRC Staff's Second Round of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents", dated September 9, 1980. Interrogatory No. 1 1. In Consumers Power Company's (CPC) response to interrogatory 4 of the Staff's first round of interrogatories, CPC states that Richard D. Story installed the replacement HEPA filter in tration 4a. on April 5, 1978. a. Describe the steps Mr. Story took when he replaced the filter. Your description should include an identification of the administrative approvals of the proposed replacement, the physical acts he undertook in replacing the filter, and the administrative concurrences in*or approvals of the completed replacement.
Answer b. Did Mr. Story functionally test the ment filter in order to demonstrate its operability?
If Mr. Story did not so test the filter, identify the person who did test the filter. c. Describe the steps taken by the person who functionally tested the filter to demonstrate its operability.
This description should identify the manner in which the air flow required for the test was provided.
- d. Identify the documents which refer or relate to the matters described in response to a. and c. above. e. Provide a copy of all documents identified in response to d. above. a. Mr. Story does not specifically recall each of the steps taken in replacing either the HEPA or the charcoal filters. The actual maintenance operation of replacing the filters would not involve the opening of the valves. Indeed, procedure M-VAS-3 (Attachment A hereto), which is the applicable Maintenance Department procedure used for replacing the charcoal filters, ,requires that the filter system be isolated.
Isolation of the filter system is accomplished by ensuring that the manual isolation valves are tagged shut as a pre-caution to workmen performing the filter replacement.
Equipment Outage Request, initiated 4/5/78, completed 4/7/78 (Attachement E to Consumers' Response to the Staff's First Round of Interrogatories) indicates that these valves were -tagged shut for the filter replacement operation.
This same Equipment Outage Request also indicates that following the completion of the filter replacement, the tags were removed. b. No. Mr. Fred Leckie, Nuclear Containment Systems, Inc., 1225 Dublin Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43215 (614)486-7113.
Mr. Leckie, an outside contractor who was employed by Nuclear Containment Systems at the time the tests were performed, was supervised by Thomas P. Neal. c. The steps taken in functionally testing the filter are set forth in procedure NCS-375, Rev. 1., 8/22/75 (Attachment D to Consumers Responses to the Staff's First Round of Interrogatories.)
Air flow required for the test may have been provided by opening the manual isolation valves in question which permits suction .on the main exhaust plenum to provide the necessary motor force to draw air through the filters. Alternatively, if the filter housing unit was open at the time the test was performed, air flow may have been supplied by leaving the valves in a closed position *and drawing auxilliary building air through the filter system. The possibility that this alternative method of drawing air through the filter system may have been used has only recently come to light. Mr. Neal does not recall which method was used for the April, 1978 filter tests. Consumers' investigation with respect to this issue continues.
Previous answers by Consumers to the Staff earlier discovery requests which may be viewed as inconsistant with the newly discovered information should be viewed as modified accordingly.
. ' d. M-VAS-3, "Ventilation System Carbon Trays Emptying" (Attachment A hereto.) The remaining documents are identified above and have been provided to the Staff in Consumers' Responses to the Staff's First Round of Interro-gatories.
- e. See answer to d. above. Interrogatory No. 2 2. In CPC's response to subparts (b) and (e) of interrogatory 7 of the Staff's first round of interrogatories, CPC states that "[e]xisting documentation would suggest that valves were opened and closed on April 6, 1978." Answer a. On what basis does CPC conclude that the valves were closed after being opened on that date? b. In what manner do the documents identified in response to interrogatory 7(e) indicate that the valves were closed on April 6, 1978? a. Our answers to the Staff's Interrogatory 7(b) and (e) did not suggest that Consumers has reached any conclusions regarding the dates on which the valves were opened and closed. Consumers continues to investigate these matters and will not reach any conclusion until the invest-igations have been completed.
- b. The relevant portions of existing documentation available as of June 23, 1980 which suggested that the valves were closed on April 6, 1978 are: 1) Procedure H.P.
' I, 6.27 (Attachment C to Consumers' Response to Staff's First Round of Interrogatories) outlines the steps followed in performing the inplace HEPA and charcoal filter tests on the filters in penetration 4a. H.P. 6.27 requires that pro-cedure NCS-375 Rev. 1, 8/22/75 (Attachment D to Consumers' Response to Staff's First Round of Interrogatories) be *followed in performing the tests. 2) Section 4.1.11 of NCS-375 requires that the system be closed after testing, and that the person performing the test "notify designated plant personnel that test is completed and system may be put in normal operation.".
- 3) Equipment Outage Request, initiated 4/5/78, completed 4/7/78 (Attachment E to Consumers' response to Staff's First Round of Interrogatories) documents that the functional tests were completed no later than 4/6/78. 4) NCS-375 Rev. 1 does not require that the valves be opened to perform the tests. Interrogatory No. 3 3. If the two manual containment isolation valves were not left in a locked-open condition on April 6, 1978, on what date does CPC contend that the valves were left in a locked-open condition prior to the discovery of the valves in this condition on September 11, 1979? If CPC cannot identify the specific date on which the valves were opened, then identify the time period before August up to September 11, 1979, during which CPC believes the locked-open condition of the valves existed.
- I Answer a. On what basis does CPC conclude that the valves were left in a locked-open condition on that alternative date or during that time period? b. Identify all documents which show or on which CPC relies to show that the valves were open on this alternative date or during this time period. c. Provide a copy of all documents identified in response to b. above. As related in Consumers' answer to the Staff's First Round of Interrogatories, Consumers' attorneys and other representatives have been conducting investigations regarding the date the valves may have been locked-open.
These investigations continue, and we have not reached any definite conclusions regarding the date which the valves were opened. a. Not applicable.
- b. Not applicable.
- c. Not applicable.
Interrogatory No. 4 4. Identify and describe all operations, including but not limited to repairs and tests, that were conducted in penetration 4a between April 6, 1978 (the date by which the HEPA filter in the line had been replaced and the new filter tested) and September 11, 1979.
Answer a. Identify all documents which concern such operations.
- b. Provide a copy of all documents identified in response to a. above. As of this date, we are aware of these "operations" conducted in penetration 4a between April 6, 1978 and Sep-tember 11, 1979. These operations are: 1. The April 6, 1978 functional test of the filters which is described in Consumers answer to Interrogatory
- 1. 2. A containment integrity check of the penetration 4a test port was conducted on May 16, 1979. 3. A local leak test of containment penetration 4a performed on September 11, 1979. Other operations may have occurred regarding this penetration during cold shutdown which would not necessarily have been documented, and which would not necessarily be recalled by the particular individual who may have opened or closed the valves in question.
- a. The Containment Integrity check list which documents the operation identified in 2. above is attached as Attachment "B". b. See a. above.
Interrogatory 5 5. In CPC's response to interrogatory 5 of the Staff's first round of interrogatories, CPC states that James McEwen inspected the test port in penetration 4a. during completion of Containment Integrity Checklist C.L. 3.3. CPC also states Mr. McEwen's inspection of penetration 4a. "may have been done on April 1 or 2, 1978, between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 Answer p.m." a. . Identify the documents which indicate that Mr. McEwen inspected the penetration on April 1 or 2, 1978. b. Provide a copy of the documents identified in response to a. above. c. Provide a copy of the checklist which Mr. McEwen completed.
- a. Containment Integrity Check List CL 3.3 which consists of four pages dated respectively April 4, 1978, April 2, 1978, April 2, 1978, April 6, 1978. In particular, see page 4 line 2 entitled "C.B. Purge Exhaust Bypass Penet No. 4a Test." b. The Check List is attached hereto as Attach-ment C. c. See b. above. Interrogatory 6 6. Identify all occasions after April 1, 1978, but before September 11, 1979, on which CPC completed a containment integrity checklist that included an inspection of penetration 4a.
Answer a. Identify the persons who inspected penetration 4a. during completion of any such checklist.
- b. Provide a copy of the checklists that were actually completed on the dates so identified.
- 6. Based upon our investigations to date, we have identified the following occasions on which a containment integrity checklist which included an inspection of the penetration 4a test port were performed after April 1, 1978 but before September 11, 1979: 1. Between April 1, 1978 and April 6, 1978. 2. Between May 16, 1979 and May 17, 1979. a. The April, 1978 check of the penetration 4a test port was performed by James McEwen. The May, 1979 check of the penetration 4a test port was performed by Thomas Neil Stevenson.
- b. With respect to the April, 1978 checklist see answer to Sb. above. The May, 1979 checklist is attached hereto as Attachment "B". Interrogatory 7 7. Identify the facts on which CPC will rely in support of the position that the manual ment isolation valves were not in a locked-open condition between April 6, 1978, and September 11, 1979.
Answer Inasmuch as the NRC Staff has the burden of proof with respect to establishing that the valves in question were in a locked-open condition between April 6, 1978 and September 11, 1979, Consumers has not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce any evidence whatever with respect to this issue. See also the answer to Interrogatory 3 above. Interrogatory 8 8. Identify each witness, and describe the matters to which he or she will testify that CPC will present with respect to whether or not the valves were in a locked open condition between April 6, 1978, and September 11, 1979. Answer See answer to Interrogatory 7 above. Interrogatory 9 9. Identify the evidence, or criteria on which CPC will rely and which CPC will present in support of its position that the noncompliances cited in Item 1 of the Notice of Violation should not be classified in the "violation" category under the Commission's enforcement criteria.
Answer The NRC Staff has the burden of proof with respect to this issue. Consequently, Consumers has not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce any
'"' , evidence whatever with respect to this issue. See also the answer to Interrogatory 3 above. Interrogatory 10 10. Identify each witness and describe the matters to which he or she will testify in support of CPC's position that the noncompliances cited in* Item 1 Answer of the Notice of Violation should not be classified in the "violation" category under the Commission's enforcement criteria.
See answer to Interrogatory 9 above. Interrogatory 11 11. Identify the evidence, factors, or criteria on which CPC will rely and which CPC will present in support of its position that civil penalties should not be imposed for each day of the breach of containment integrity cited in Item 1 of the Notice of Violation.
Answer The Staff has the burden of proof with respect to this issue. Consequently, we have not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce any evidence whatever with respect to this issue. See also our response to Interrogatory 3 above . . Moreover, given the Staff's refusal to identify any of the factors or criteria which the Staff generally relies upon in determining whether to classify an item of
' I noncompliance as a continuing violation, we are not in a position to determine what evidence, if any, should be adduced with respect to this issue. Interrogatory 12 12. Identify each witness and describe the matters to which he or she will testify in support of CPC's position that civil penalties should not be imposed for each day of the violation of containment tegrity cited in Item 1 of the Notice of Violation.
Answer See answer to Interrogatory 11 above. Interrogatory 13 13. Identify the evidence, factors, or criteria on which CPC will rely and which CPC will present in support of its position that Item 2 of the Notice of Violation should not be classified in the "violation" category under the Commission's forcement criteria.
Answer The NRC Staff has the burden of proof with respect to this issue. Consequently, we have not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce any evidence whatever with respect to this issue. See also answer to Interrogatory 3 above. Interrogatory 14 14. Identify each witness and describe the matters to which he or she will testify in support of CPC's
- J Answer position that Item 2 of the Notice of Violation should not be classified in the "violation" category under the Commission's enforcement criteria.
See Answer to Interrogatory 13 above. Interrogatory 15 15. Identify the evidence, factors, or criteria on Answer which CPC will rely and which CPC will present in support of its position that the civil penalties imposed under the Director of the Off ice of Inspection and Enforcement's Order of December 20, 1979 should be mitigated or remitted.
The question of whether or not civil penalties should be mitigated or remitted presupposes a finding that Consumers actually commmitted*an item of noncompliance.
Accordingly, Consumers has not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce any evidence whatev.er with respect to this issue. Interrogatory 16 16. Identify each witness and describe the matters to which he or she will testify in support of CPC's position that the civil penalties imposed under the Director's Order should be mitigated or remitted.
Answer See our answer to Interrogatory 15 above.
Interrogotary 17 17. If any of the persons identified in response to interrogatories 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 will be presented as expert witnesses, identify the following with respect to each witness: Answer a. The witness' field of expertise and the facts which qualify the witness as an expert in that field; and b. any other administrative or judicial proceeding in which the witness has been granted status as an expert witness. Not applicable.
Interrogatory 18 18. If CPC intends to present witnesses other than those identified in response to interrogatories 8, 10, 12, 13 and 16, identify each such witness and the matters to which he or she will testify. If any such witness will be presented as an expert witness, provide the information requested in interrogatory 17 as part of the identification of any additional expert witness. Answer Since the NRC Staff carries the burden of proof with respect to all issues in this matter, except possibly the issues relating to mitigation and remission of fines (see answer to Interrogatory 15 above), Consumers has not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce anv evidence whatever at the hearinq. Consequently, Consumers has not determined what witnesses, if any, it intends to produce at the hearing.
Interrogatory 19 19. Identify and describe all of the evidence, documentary or otherwise, which CPC intends to present at the hearing. Answer Since the NRC Staff carries the burden of establishing that the alleged noncompliances occurred and that civil penalties are warranted, Consumers has not determined at this time whether there will be any need to introduce any evidence whatever at the hearing. Interrogatory 20 20. Identify the document referred to as MARU 63-79 in CPC's internal document RWS 168-79, dated December 5, 1979. Provide a copy of the document identified as MARU 63-79. Answer MARU 63-79 is a Consumers Power internal memorandum from R.M. Marusich to R. W. Sinderman, dated December 4, 1979 entitled "Ability of the Filter Bank In The Containment Exhaust Value Bypass Line To Withstand The Effects of Blowdown" Rev. 1. This document has already been provided to the Staff as an enclosure to the December 6, 1979 letter from Mr. Youngdahl to Mr. Stello regarding the Notice of Proposed Violation, and immediately follows RWS 168-79 referred to in Interrogatory
- 20.
Interrogatory 21 21. Provide a copy of the document identified as CPC internal memorandum JLB 74-79, dated December 5, 1979. The reference is made in CPC's answer to interrogatory 3 of the Staff's first round of interrogatories.
Answer JLB 74-79 is a Consumers Power internal memo from J. L. Beer to R. W. Sinderman dated December 5, 1979 entitled "Technical Review of Radiation Dose Estimates Post-DBA With Containment Purge Filter Valves Open (RWS 168-79) ." As with the document requested in the previous interrogatory, JLB 74-79 was provided to the Staff as an enclosure to the December 6, 1979 letter from Mr. Youngdahl to Mr. Stello. The persons who prepared or contributed to the preparation of the answers to these interrogatories are as follows: Interrogatory 1 Richard D. Story, Assistant Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor, Palisades Nuclear Plant, Covert, Michigan 49403 (616) 764-8913; Thomas P. Neal, Senior Technical Analyst, Consumers Power Company, 212 West Michigan Avenue, Jackson, Michigan 49201 (517) 788-1603; Paul M. Murphy, Outside Counsel to Consumers Power Company, Isham, Lincoln & Beale, One First National Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60603, (312) 558-7500; Alan P. Bielawski, Outside Counsel To Consumers Power Company, Isham, Lincoln & Beale, One First National Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60603, (312) 558-7500.
Interrogatory 2 Alan P. Bielawski.
Paul M. Murphy. Interrogatory 3 Alan P. Bielawski.
Paul M. Murphy. Interrogatory 4 Thomas P. Neal. James McEwen, Auxilliary Operator, Palisades Nuclear Plant, Covert, Michigan 49403 (616) 764-8913.
Thomas N. Stevenson, Auxilliary Operator, Palisades Nuclear Plant, Covert, Michigan 49403 (616) 764-8913.
Alan P. Bielawski.
Interrogatory 5 Alan P. Bielawski.
Interrogatory 6 James McEwen. Thomas N. Stevenson.
Alan P. Bielawski.
Paul M. Murphy.
Interrogatories 7-21 Alan P. Eielawski.
Paul M. Murphy. DATED: October 16, 1980. Michael I. Miller Paul M. Murphy ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE .. One First National Plaza Suite 4200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 558-7500 One of the Attorneys for Consumers Power Company \
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of: CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Palisades Nuclear Power Facility) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. 50-255 License No. DPR-20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Alan P. Bielawski, one of the attorneys for Consumers Power Company, certify that copies of "Consumers Power Company's Response to the NRC Staff's Second Round of Interrogatories and Document Requests" have been served in the above-captioned matter on all parties on the attache9 service list by United States mail, postage prepaid, this day of October, 1980. Alan P. Bielawski DATED: October ;t I 1980.
. ' . . . Honorable Ivan W. Smith Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 James P. Murray, Esq. Director and Chief Counsel Rulemaking and Enforcement Division Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 James Lieberman, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Legal Director Washington, D.C. 20555 Stephen G. Burns, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Legal Director Washington, D.C. 20555 Docketing and Service Section Off ice of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Judd L. Bacon, Esq. Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201
. -**'-' . . ' ;,\
f.,/. A t -----" *,; -. .-** 1 r Rev. 0 e,-::-:-. __,,. .. ....... .. * .* Par.;e J o:f Ventillation System Carbon Trnys Emptyi.ng
1.0 Purpose
To remove ventille.tion carbon trays and prepare them .:for shipment to vendor for refill * . ' ... . .:. .* 2.0 Initial Conditions
- ....; .. -* . :_ ;.,':/f...
system has been isolated for removal of: the t.rays. *-:
3
.. ty . ._, . ". *':* **;-
- .-. .-
portion of this procedure that does not *apply to a particular*
f"il ter * ....
shall be denoted by the abbreviation of' appliciable!' (N/A ..
- . :.'i*.:.: . ... __ , _ .. _.-::**_, *:_:._ * . *.* -.
-
.... : '.* . . . . ... _.-: .. *. -4: l Clearance must be obtained from the Shift Superv1 sor before aJ.lowi ng -:' *
- work :to begin in the :filter housing . .
- 4.2 A radiation, end co:nte.rr:ination
!:Ur>.rey shouJ.d be conducted on the cer'bon
__ bef'ore removal_ and prior to shi-pment f'or rei'ilJ.ing
- . *. -.. '.* .. *. Adequate ventillation or suitable contamination controi of' the area *.-** .* .. is. required as charcoal 1fill dust to some ext.ent arid may pose a ** **. '. ..
up problem. Check with Radiation Protection for an area, * .....
and respiratory requirements. . . . . -. ! 4 j*; Use* *care in a.11 steps *to avoid damage to the stainless steel trays. *.
- --.
.'. )j. 5 *-*'
with less than 60 days decay may be moved in the spent fuel . ' . ' ... * ... _*. *p* ool_ .. or . *. .. --.. I. 0
- reactor cavity with the spent fuel pool caroon trays removed
- 5.0
- r*;** * ** *.
-. :.-;* : .Clearance
- for working :filter trays is received :front the ,. . !{/ , j .. J ... (/ ,
Supervisor.
S_.S. ,. . . . *. -:-*--* 5.2 _:*A survey has been conducted RadiP.tion Proted;ion pripr to start-. * *ing work. Date 3-t c-*1 $ !) "f; a D) fr'l-4. * " 5."3 Unbolt the carbon trays and remove carefully frorri .t.he f"ilter l1ousil1[.{.
Caution: Preform steps 5. 4, 5. 5,. nnd G in rm ventillated area. Provide suitable contamirmtion c_ontrol 2.S directed by Radiation Protection.
With the cnrbon trays :flat on a table or other smooth suri"ace clrill. out t.he two sealing plate rivets with a Ho. 30 drill (2 plates p-?.r tray assembly).
Be careful to drill only the rivet need and not; _-Lhe tray wall. Save the plates :for ret:urn to the vendor with the empty trays. (See attached sketch) . .. -* .-:!; ***.*.
. -* ' ,.' ** . ., . * -:. ;.....;, --*. :.* 1.-. r .:.*., .:.-* .._ *"='*
- _j ...... ' . .. e* *. .
REV. 0 Tu.e;e 2 of' I; Alte:r:-nate:
With the carbon t:rays flat on e. table or other smooth surface*insert a sharp bladed thin chisel between the rivet head and the plate or between the -plate and the tray wall. Be careful not to punch a hole in the tray wall.. Tap sharply with a -bam.-:ler to sheer the rivit. Save the plates for return to the vendor with the empty trays. (See attached:sketch).
....
- *-... ,* .. .. .:;:* . -.r: :::* .. -=** . -.*.* **:.
- -. :* . =j: .:.** ... . . . --* . as requirec1
- .( 1100 \
....-.*--*---'-'----
- e. . .. . .. -.. **---*-;-:-***
- .. ***\ i .... * *!r .. -
- : *!*--...... . . _ ..... ; .. -.:._
- -.. -.. **.
- . i -* .-... :*; Cfl RB (J_A; {./ os-gt/ a 90 7 --BAek ___ .c ..* *-:-;-* .. ---*-.. :.**--Ef\f D VI£ Li/_ . . -.. ......; _. **-" . ...
I
'. . . b /'j}'-_ ----"' . *' <::if ------*---.i*.:f! : . --: . ' * ..:...!:..
- . _;_...:___
__ * --; __ _ * .:__, .. ,., ;
- i. '.
... ;; _____
M-Vf1S-3 HEV. O Page 3 of' 11 .. ! . --! .. !;*-. ...'.. ---
TS _ _-{3£, __ :___
__ . . . .... * .. ;. ***r--*.-*-*.
_!: ...
-** .... .... :* . ... ...l.--.--.i
..... : ..
- L.;._ .. -'. .. *.*. ,;****=* . * * ;> *. : .. ___ ,i .* .:..-.:-;.*:*-**-
- -*-**-**-*-*'*--
I *---,..------
- -=-.* ... I . *.
I : .. * .... *T* .. ; .. r I "o* ' . ., . ... : . ::.= . : i *-.. : --*-
- *.. ;.
-.JI . _ B1nmr1Y1MG i-\ -+ -::.: iJI 1. *** !-'----***
- .;.* ,,, . ;* .. . ;; I . .. *., .. * .. . ___ \I . I.*. . . *-\.---**-. .. I .. --:.:.._;...._
-** ___ . ...... ... ' . *---.
- -. * -.*. J \
- ----; I *
- I'age It of 1 1 d pm/ 100 cm c. : .. . B-8 HTITIAT, . ..t
...,--------J
' I I l .... I * .. . -.. L. .*; .. i* .. -*:; I .;,<}J: ....
- I ... ***-I* ' :* I i ... !_*:.,_:-.. !
.. _______ J ______
____
_l;..._.*
--!-1 __ **_;-.:*---=-*,:;,-.:_.-*
.. . .-:: _l:--. *;_' . i ! ;.:: ..
I ..
__ ,._, *1 *-
- '.; i . __ ; .... : .* f ..
__
i.___::__.
-_ --. --!-c-'
__;__.
.-..
... _--:: -.. --._1_* *--* :--:
- --'_ ----.. -. -::
7: * : .. . * . :* __ :,* * * ._. > ::>*: -T *. _.;7:: . i I-.-*
_
..
1 I * .. * -. i"--. -. ----1 I r ---. .;....1; r------\*-.
-t----**-----
- -* **--* --* .... -**--*------
- -. --
r-! ; : -I _ i -------1*------------------1--**---------i*--_
-*------:--_
---r*---, ***
__
..
- I
+
- =------
=-.-_j .
... ___ *'* ---* ... r ---*-*-* :**:: ' .. * . -; ..... * . ":;-: .... ___ _ :-iauld Che.nge pproved; *******.*
.:-.* . . . ;, : .**. :. . . :-. . . *. :.*:
.-* ... -:; .. * ... *---* \ -,__-__ ... _ _.-,,._ ".,_ -*:_.*-
J.tl.-:?in.
- 10. 3-5-l . 0 >
- l/ 7 6 --. --'t_ l; ... _. "\ --* * ... °:""*" -I -;;_ .. __ . :----.... *-:.*.: .:-.-* *. **' *-* . . *= **:
-. ... -*--.....
.......
':-. ** .... .-. * ...... . . ....... _ .. :.:::*-:_;,.." _-.... .::* . .: .. . .. . : .
-. .,,.*. : .... * -.... :;*.**.-_ ..... .*
., <. .. i..: *-'* ....... ... : ... ... . -:.. . -' . -' .. '":, -:'-. :"-:* .-* .... ...
""*
-* . . *_ * .... -*: __ , . . '* ___ ...... -. .. ... _._,,j.. ;i<:;'". /
.*... . I r PRC APR 6, 1976 APPR. CONTAINMEHT INTEGRITY.CHECK LIST page 1 -Rev. 2 ., Check whether the following valves are verified operable (stroke & observe position lights), or are LOCKED CLOSED: VALVE* NO. CV 1911 CV 1503 CV 0738 CV 0739 CV 0939 CV 1004 CV 1037 CV 1358 CV 1001 CV 1910
- f;V 1808 CV 1814 * -CV 1806 CV 1501 CV 1101 CV 1064 CV 1103 CV 1002 CV 1036 CV 1044 CV 0120 CV 0770 CV '07'.l'.l CV 1807 CV 1813 Cl3 P.AI{EL Containment Bldg. Selected Samples Containment Heating Steam S-G No. 2 Top Blowdown S-G No. 1 Top Blowdown Shield Cooling Surge Tank Clean Waste Recvr. Tks. Inlet Clean Waste Recvr. Tks. Recirc. Nitrogen Supply Primary Sys. Drn. Tank Recirc. Contf'-*.nment Bldg. _Selected Samples Containment Purge Supply Air Room Supply Containment Purge Exhaust Containment Heating Steam Return Containment Vent Header Clean Waste Recvr. Tks. Vent Containment Sump Drain Primary Sys. Drain Tank Outlet Clean Waste Recvr. Tanks Recirc. Clean Waste Recvr. Tanks Outlet Pressurizer Instr. Test S-G No. 2 Bottom Blowdown S-G No. 1 Bottom Blowd.own Containment Purge Supply Air R66m Supply : .CV .. 1805 . *
- Con:tairunent Pur.ge _ Exhaus ***. -*** . . . --.. *-:. : . CV 1803: * --. Conie.inme.nt Purge CV 1502 CV l102 CV 1104 ContainT.ent Heating Stea!!l Return Containment Vent Sump Drain Completed by: . Date
,, OPERATES NOR?:W.LLY
'Jf{l _tztl* itlL. 1/iL-..... I .iAL .1 'Jii.. :17+L* SiiL Jlh. SNL *)J/L. LOCKED CLOSED . I t PRC 'APR 6,,, 1976 Rev. 2 i// .. CV 1007 CV 1038 CV 1045 *CV 1065 CV 0767 CV 0768 CV 0121 CV 0910 CV 0911 CV 0940 CV 2009 _CV 2083 CV 0155. MQV P-1 120SFP 118S?P 512CRW ll 70 .A -1170 B 2320 eve 503 .Prim. Syst. Drain Tank Outlet Clean Waste Recur. Tanks Recir. Clean Haste Recur. Tanks Outlet Clean Haste R2cur. Tanks 'le::t -S-G No. 1 Bottom Blowdown S-G No. 2 Bottom Blowdm-m Pressurizer Instr. Test Console Containment Component Cooling Inlet Containment Component Cooling Outlet.
_Component Coqling O.:ttlet ** Letdown PCP Controlled Bleedciff Quench Tank Spray ILRT PANEL Containment test header isolation Reactor Cavity Fill (outside)
Reactor Cavity Drain (Outside)
CHRT Vent*Penet.
No. 25 Test NSSS Selecte:::tcd Samples Penet Ho. 21 Test_ --. -* . ,.-. . . . . *.*. ContaiilI!lent 1'12
- No.* .26 Test ILRT Fill Line Penet No. 2r{ 'i'est r.ettimm Pe net Ho. 36 Test PDT Pvs Hecirc. rcnet rro. 37 Test C .B. Heat in:.;
38 Test renet. Ho. --o--.... _ . :f7f-l-."J'7/L . _)l}-l ,, Room No. 121B/l50 121B/150 121B/150 121B/150 121B/150
- 12l:S/l50 121B/150 121B/150 Completed by: ------CL3.3 ..... ' cc
!-"RC '9/7/71 .. APPR. Rev. 3 .*e --503 VA C.B. Heating Steam Penet, No. 39 Test 121B"ll50 506 CRi*T C'i'ffiT inlet Penet No. 41 Test 121B/150 1126 PC to Quench tank Penet No. 42 Test 121B/150 . 500 HG C. B. Vent Header Penet No. 116 Test l21B/l50 514 SFP Reactor Cavity Fill Penet No. 64 Te.st . l21B/150 * . . 515sFP Reactor Cavity Drain Penet No. 72 Test 121B/l50 515 CR:l CHRT Recir. Inlet Penet No. 67 Test *m )lb :)
I :,.1iJJ?-5-I&
- 1 -n,rs :; .. ,,,-r.,.,.75
- .. ,<505 VA Air Room Purge Supply Penet No. 68 Test l21B/l50 518 CRH C\-ffiT outlet Penet No. 69 Test 118 *-----'--. 604
1/ ?.z 3344 ES C. B. Spray Pen et. :r-;o. 30 Test 12J.A -------
I .ZC/l-7' i . 3227 ES c. B. Spray Recirculation 121A -____;;.=------
3346 ES C. B. Spray Penet No. 31 test 121A --------=TV-S I 3217 ES c. B. Spray Recirculation 121A -------
.-;;
,_$:,le( 7 3348 ES S. I. Tanks Drain Penet No. 33 Test 121A -------. ._s .,,: ; 3234 ES Inj. Recirc. Isolation 121A -------3236 ES Inj. Sample Flush to EDT 121A -------
3237 ES Inj. Recirc. Isolation 121A <;;-/(-2 500 DRW C.B. Sump Drain Perret i:.-o. 52 Test 1 -------5 -k*77 'ftJS. S'/&*7j 502 CRW PDT Outlet Penet. No. 47 Test 118 -------LJ-i , 513 CRH CWRT Recirc *. Outlet Penet No. 49 test 118 --------rrs) .S-lt-77 \ 507 CC C. B. Component Cooling Inlet Penet 123 :No. 14 Test ----='--------
508:_CC. . ._.: -C. .. Goffil'onent Cooling Outlet Penet
':?_--JC-T lro'; l5. Test .
- l22G!i, Service Air to 23G r,. B. Service :Ur Pi=net No. 10 Test PRC 3/8/78 . ' .nc:v. _j I.."O.t:)'C
- 506 VA 50'7 VA .*568 !1$ -i536 CD J;o3 vA 'j...ll 7SFP Xl21SFP /(60lVA P-5VA ll2.9 PC 602VA F-6VA L-6VA 'n3*r" V..M.
- APPR. .J(
C. B. Purge Exhaust *Penet No. 4 Test C.B. Purge Bypass Penet Ho. a* Test S-G No. l Bottom B-D Penet No. 5 Test S-G No. 2 Bottom B-D Penet -No. 6 Test Shield Cooling Surge Tank Fill.Penet No. ll Test c. B. Purge Supply Penet. No. l Test Reactor Cavity Drain (Inside).
Reactor Cavity Fill*(Inside)
-inside Personnel Lock pressure test. PZR. Inst. Test pen No. 20 Test PI header test Escape Lock Pressui*e test
-outside PI header,drip leg Ro--No
- 238 238 238 338 142 142A l42A I 233 233 227 341 223 223 Transfer Tube and threading cable Blind Flanges Bolted in Place Personnel Emergency Escape Lock Door(s) Closed Date of Latest Leak Test: Personnel Lock Door(s) Closed Date of Leak Test: Equipment Door Bolted in '?lace &
Tested, & Test connection capped Date of Leak Test: Conteinment Test Header Blind Flange Bolted in place (penetration No. 27, immediatel:r
".Jerieath Personnel Lock) I NOTE: During Refueling or Cold Shutdown both doors of the Personnel be *open at same".tillle the.
as required in Check Sheet B28-6 and the SEP charcoal filters are in operation
- ...--L._. '.-.-,,/ Completed b:.r
___ _ \ ., U..L "'T CL3.3 11'S 1-)-r l -nx 7(
s--fb-17 -, ,," ,.
<FY
_;_-!* 7 ;' -,c:. < .?' °J . I :;:::._ f.;0/-:i.c;*
"/7 (i;: ..-;;--/ -,./--;-.*; ( % .. *, *,' . ,/ E?;-//.'-7 tf-1:7 c;:;::;-"'> *-!
.. . ** PRC APR 6, 1976 . -* APPR. Check whether the following valves are verified operable (stroke* & observe position lights), or are LOCKED CLOSED: VALVE NO. CV 1911 CV 1503 CV 0738 CV 0739 CV 0939 CV 1004 CV 1037 CV 1358 CV 1001 CV 1910 CV 1808 CV 1814 * -CV 1806. CV 1501 CV 1101 CV 1064 CV 1103 CV 1002 CV 1036 CV 1044 CV 0120 CV 0770 CV 'OTll CV J.807 CV 1813 CV 1805 ' CV 1803 CV 1502 CV 1102 CV 1104 Cl3 PANEL Containment Bldg. Selected Samples Containment Heating Steam S-G No. 2 Top Blowdown S-G No. 1 Top Blowdown .. Shield Cooling Surge Tank Clean Waste Recvr. Tks. Inlet
- Clean Waste Recvr. Tks. Recirc. Nitrogen.Supply Sys. Drn. Tank Recirc. Containment Bldg. S_elected Samples Containment Purge Supply Air Room Supply Containment Purge Exhaust Heating Steam Return Containment Vent Header Clean Waste Recvr. Tks. Vent. Containment Stm1p Drain Primary* Sys. Drain Tank Outlet Clean Waste Recvr. Tanks Clean Waste Recvr. Tanks Pressurizer Instr. Test S-G No. 2 Bottom Blowdo-wn S-G No. 1 Bottom Blowdown Containment Purge Supply Air Room Supply Recirc. Outlet Containment Purge Exhaust Containnent Purge Exhaust Containment Heating Return Containment Vent Header Sump Drain r /* . I I I/ OPERATES NORMALLY :./ / ' I / ' ! I Completed
_____ / ___ Date / /.1 LOCKED CLOSED _J
Rev. 2 CV 1007 CV 1038 CV 1045 CV 1065 CV 0767 CV 6768 CV 0121 CV 0910 CV 0911 CV 0940 CV 2009 CV 2083 CV 0155 MOV P-1 Prim. Syst. Drain Tank outlet Clean Waste Recur. Tanks Recir. Clean Haste Recur. Tanks Outlet Clean Haste Recur. Tanks Vent S-G No. 1 Bottom Blowdmm S-G No. 2 Bottom Blowdmm
- Pressurizer Instr. Test Console Containment Component Cooling Inlet Containment Component Cooling outlet Coqling Outlet Letdown PCP Controlled Bleedoff Quench Tank Spray ILRT PANEL Containment test header isolation Pnge 2 of 4 L / *tAL..-/ // *i./ -i/ .J ir'L ,/ Check The Following Valves LOCKED CLOSED, and test connections capped: (Test valves may be lock wired closed) 120SFP 118SFP 5l2CRW ll70 A -1170 B 501 V A 2320 eve 503 Cff:l Reactor Cavity Fill (Outside)
Reactor Cavity Drain (Outside)
CWRT Vent P2-net. No. 25 Test HSSS Selecte;:;t(;d .Samples Penet No. 21 Test Containment N2 Supply Penet No. 26 Test ILRT Fill Line Penet No. 27 Test Letclmm Penet No. 36 Test PDT fys Recirc. Penet Ho. 37 Test C.B. Heating Conclensate Penet. No. 38 'i'est Room No. 12lB/l50 121B/l50 121B/150 121B/150 121B/l50 l21B/150 l21B/150 l21B/150 12113/150 CL3.3 '*
-. PRC 9 /7 /77. A Rev. 3 '*l\o '. ' . APPR.
- 503 VA 506 CRH 1126 PC 500 EG 514 SPP **515SFP 515 CRH .:-505 VA 518 CRW 604 VA 3344 ES 3227 ES 3346 ES 3217 ES 3348 ES 3234 ES 3236 ES 3237 ES 500 DRH ,-502 CRH 513 CRH 507 cc 508 cc 122CA 142 Cfa_ C.B. Heating Steam Penet, No. 39 Test CWRT inlet Penet 1fo. 41 PMW to quench tank Penet No. 42 Test C. B. Vent Header Penet. No. 116 Test Cavity Fill Penet No. 6!f Test Reactor Cavity Drain Penet No. 72 Test CWRT Recir. Inlet Penet No. 67 Test Air Room Purge Supply Penet No. 68 Test C"vffiT Outlet Penet No. 69 Test FI Header Isolation C. B. Spray Penet. No. 30 Test C. B. Spray Recirculation C. B. Spray Penet No. 31 test C. B. Spray Recirculation S. I. Tanks Drain Perret No. 33 Test Inj. Recirc. Isolation Inj *. sample Flush to EDT Inj. Recirc. Isolation C.B. Sump Drain Penet No. 52 Test PDT Outlet Penet. No. 47 Test CWRT Recirc. Outlet Penet No. 49 test C. B. Component Cooling Inlet Penet No. 14 Test C. B. Component Cooling Outlet Penet No. 15 Test Service Air to Containment C. B. Service .'Ur Penet No. 10 Test e Room No. 121B/150 121B/150 12lB/l50 l2lB/l50 l21B/150 Pae;e 3 of 11 CL3.3 121B/l50 "b I l21B/l50 118 l21B/150 12J.A l21A
- l21A 121A l21A l21A 121A 121A
- 1 118 118 . D-t 1<
- 123
- C.B. Purge Exhaust Penet No. 4 Test 238
- 507 VA C.B. PurBe Exhaust Bypass Penet No. a* Test -----""----[;' 238 .*568 MS *, I" -:i530 CD J:)o8 VA 117SFP 121SFP 6olVA 602VA P-6VA L-6VA o03VA S-G No. l Bottom B-D Penet No. 5 Test S-G No. 2 Bottom B-D Penet No. 6 Test Shield Cooling Surge Tank Fill Penet No. ll Test c. B. Purge Supply Penet. No. 1 Test Reactor Cavity Drain (Inside) Reactor cavity Fill (Inside) PI header isolation
-inside C<'.'rvT.
Personnel Lock pressure test . PZR. Inst. Test pen;t No. 20 Test PI header test Escape Lock Pressui*e test
-outside PI header drip leg 238 2:i8 338 1112 142A 142A 233 233 227 341 223 223 Fuel Transfer Tube and threading cable Blind Flanges Bolted in Place . . --I () l-.
Personnel Emergency Escape Lock Door(s) Closed De:te of Latest Leak Test: Personnel Lock Door(s) Closed Date of Latest Test: Equipment Door Bolted-* in *?lace &
Tested, & Test connection capped Date of' Latest Lea.k Test: Containment Test Header Blind Flange Bolted in place (penetration No. 27, irmnediatelJ
""-:Jereath Personnel ID ck) NOTE: During Refueling or Cold Shutdown both doors of the Personnel Lock may be open at the same time if the as required in Check Sheet B28-6 and the SFP charcoal filters are in operation.
Completed by: F-<:........, Date I JJ) Y--1-7:7 '.' '-*--, "j--_::: 7 -;:-,;-JI:) [)/t 121(,20,/;'i . ,9 /( lf/c/1 { \ I l . -tslf,K ih/z'l I I I J