ML12362A042: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| document type = Report, Technical | | document type = Report, Technical | ||
| page count = 161 | | page count = 161 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Other | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 C Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Table C-1 provides a description of each item, anchorage verification confirmation, a list of Area Walk-By Checklists associated with each item, comments, and page numbers of each Seismic Walkdown Checklist. | |||
C-1 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Table C-1. Summary of Seismic Walkdown Checklists Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed? | |||
By ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS Y 20 C- 7 CABINET 1B DIESEL GEN 1B -ENGINE Deferred -risk CONTROL RELAY PANEL management 1B-480V-ES 480V ENGINEERED N 18 Deferred for anchorage SAFEGUARDS MCC 1 B inspection 1 B-480V-ESF VENT 1B-480V-ESF BUILDING VEN Y 9 C- 10_____ ____BUILDING MCC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1B ENGINEERED Deferred to bus outage 1B-480V-ESV SAFEGUARDS VALVES & N 10 for anchorage inspection HEATING CONTROL CENTR for anchrageinspctio 480V SCREEN HOUSE Deferred to bus outage 1B-480V-SHES ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS N 29 for anchorage inspection MCC 1B for ancorgeinsecio 4160V ENGINEERED Deferred to bus outage 1E-4160V-ES SAFEGUARDS BUS 1E N 21 for anchorage inspection 125/250V DC ES DIST PANEL Deferred -risk 1 F N management 125/25OVDC DIST PANEL Deferred -risk FOR EDG 1B management 1S-480V-ES 480V ENGINEERED N 18 Deferred for anchorage SWGR SAFEGUARDS BUS 1S inspection 1S-480V-ES 1S 480V ES SWGR N 18 Deferred for anchorage XFMR 4160/480V XFMR N inspection 480V ENGINEERED Deferred to bus outage 1T-480V-SHES SAFEGUARDS SCREEN N 29 for anchorage inspection HOUSE BUS 1T for anchrageinspctio 1iT-48V-SHES-1GT 480V SCREEN HOUSE ES Deferred to bus outage XFMR SWGR 4160/480V XFMR N 29 for anchorage inspection 3B ESAS ACTUATION CABINET Y 20 C-13 3B Y_20 C-______13__ | |||
3B ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Y 20 C- 16 4B 5B ESAS ACTUATION CABINET Y 20 C-19 5B Y_20 C-______19__ | |||
5B AH-C-0004B CONTROL BUILDING Y 17 C- 23 CHILLER AH-E-0008A SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A Y 33 C-26 FAN AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING AH-E-0015B UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH Y 12 C- 29_PUMPS I Table C-1 Page 1 of 5 C-2 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed? | |||
By EMERG FEED PUMP AH-E-0024B N 7 C- 32 COOLER FAN CONTROL BUILDING AH-E-18B EOERG BUPLYFN N 25 C- 35 EMERG B SUPPLY FAN AH-E-19B CONTROL BUILDING B N 26 C- 38 RETURN AIR FAN AH-E-i1 B REACTOR BLDG COOLING Y 40 C- 41 FAN AH-E-95B CONTROL BUILDING 2ND Y 18 C- 45 FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR BS-PS-0933 ESSATAINY 13 C- 48 ESAS ACTUATION CONTROL RM CONSOLE Deferred -risk CENTER CONTROL PANEL management CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-LT-1061 TANK A LEVEL Y 4 C- 51 TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-LT-1 062 TANK B LEVEL Y 4 C- 54 TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-LT-1063 TANK B LEVEL Y C-57 TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-T-0001B Y 8 C-60 TANK 1B CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL CO-V-0010OB N/A 8 C- 64 VALVE CRD-CB-1D CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Y 27 C- 67 EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-P-1 C/1D DF-FI-1151 TO DF-T-2B FLOW N/A 37 C- 70 INDICATOR DF-LI-J500B EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B N/A 37 C- 73 LEVEL INDICATOR EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL DF-P-0001B TRANSFER PUMP B (DC) Y 38 C- 76 DF-T-0002B EDG FUEL OIL/EG-Y-1B DAY Y 37 C-79 TANK DH-T-0001 BWST N 8 Deferred -risk management DH-V-0005B BWST TO DH PUMPS N/A 15 C- 82 DR-P-1B DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Y 28 C- 85 DR-S-1 B DECAY RIVER STRAINER Y 28 C- 88 EED-B-i B 250V DC STATION BATTERY Y 22 C- 9i D1B C EED-BC-1B IBATTERY CHARGER 1 B Y 124 C- 94d Table C-1 Page 2 of 5 C-3 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed? | |||
By EED-BC-1 D BATTERY CHARGER 1 D Y 24 C- 97 EED-BC-1F BATTERY CHARGER 1F Y 24 C- 100 125/250V DC DIST PANEL 1B Deferred -risk EED-PNL-1B N 24 mngmn __management EE-INV-1B INVERTER 1B ELEL6 Y 24 C- 103 EE-INV-1F 1F INVERTER Y 24 C- 106 EE-PNL-VBB VBB 120 VAC PANEL Y 24 C-109 EFW TO B OTSG FLOW EF-FT-0782 Y 6 C- 112 TRANSMITTER STEAM DRIVEN EF-P-0001 Y 5 C- 115 EMERGENCY FEED PUMP EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Y 6 EF-P-0002B Y6C- 118 EFW PUMPS SUCTION EF-V-0001 B N/A 5 C- 121________CROSS CONNECT VALVEN/5 EMERG RIVER WATER TO EF-V-0004 N/A 4 C- 124 EFW EF-V-0030B EFW TO OTSG B FLOW N/A 6 C- 128 CTRL VALVE EG-C-2D EDGBAIRCOOLERB Y 35 C- 131 RADIATOR EDG B AIR COOLER A EG-C-3B RADIATOR Y 35 C- 134 RADIATOR EG-P-0001 B EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING Y 37 C-137 AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR EG-T-0001B-1 EDG lBAIR START 1 Y 37 C- 140 RESERVOIR EG-T-0001B-2 EDG1BAIRSTART2 Y 37 C-143 RESERVOIR TANK EG-Y-0001B EMERGENCY DIESEL Y 37 C- 146 GENERATOR 1B HSPS-CH-2 HSPS CHANNEL 2 Y 27 C- 149 2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" IA-T-0007B TANY 37 C- 152 TRAIN IA-T-0019 AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR Y 1 C- 155 FW-V-16B/17B MS-PT-1 184 OTSG "B" STEAMC-159 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER CONT ISOL B OTSG MS MS-V-0001C IOL VALVE Y 44 C- 162 ISOL VALVE CONT ISOL B OTSG ISOL TO MS-V-0002B N/A 5 C- 165 ATMOS MS-V-0004B ATMOSPHERIC DUMP N/A 5 C- 168 VALVE FOR 'B' OTSG MU-FT-i 127 HPI THRU MU-V-16B FLOW Y 15 C- 171 TRANSMITTER I I I I_ I Table C-1 Page 3 of 5 C-4 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed? | |||
By MU-FT-I 128 HPI THRU MU-V-16C FLOW Y 13 C- 174 TRANSMITTER HPI THROUGH MU-V-16D MU-FT-i1129 Y 31 C- 177 FLOW TRANSMITTER MU-P-0001B MAKEUP PUMP 1B Y 14 C- 180 MU-V-0003 CONTAINMENT ISOL LD N/A 15 C- 183 COOLER ISOL VLV NR-P-0001B NUC SVC COOL RIVER Y 28 C- 186 WATER 'B' PUMP NR-V-0001B NUC PUMP RIVER PUMP B N/A 28 C- 189 DISCH VLV NR-V-0004B DEICING MU VALVE B N/A 16 C- 192 NUCLEAR SERVICES NS-C-0001B CLOSED COOLING WATER Y 16 C- 195 HEAT EXCHANGER 1B NS-P-0001B NUC SVC CLOSED Y 11 C- 198 COOLING WATER 'B' PUMP CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-NS-V-0052B N 3 C- 201 1 B MTR COOLER SUPPLY CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-NS-V-0053B N 3 C- 204 1 B MTR COOLER RETURN SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP NS-V-0054B ROOM COOLING COIL N/A 33 C- 207 FLOW CONTROL VLV RC-RV-0002 PILOT OPERATED RELIEF N/A 42 C- 210 VALVE (PORV)RC-V-0002 PORV BLOCK VALVE N/A 42 C- 213 RB EMERG COOL RIVER RR-P-0001B RB PUMP Y 29 C- 216 WTR 'B' PUMP RR-S-0001B RB EMERG CLNG RIVER Y 29 C- 219 WTR 'B' STRAINER RR-S-1B RR-S-1B CONTROL PANEL N 29 C- 222 CONTAINMENT ISOL RBEC RR-V-0003A N/A 2 C- 225 COIL 'A' INLET VLV. __ ________RR-V-6 RB COOL COIL RR-V-0005 N/A 3 C- 228 DISCH BYPASS RB EMERG. COOL COIL RR-V-0006 BACK PRESSURE N/A 3 C- 231 REGULATOR SF2-DPT SF-P-2 FLOW TRANSMITTER Y 30 SWEL 2 C- 234 SF9-DPT-1 B SF POOL COOLING Y 34 SWEL 2 C- 237 WATER FLOW XMTR SF9-DPT-2 A SF POOL COOLING Y 34 SWEL 2 C- 240 WATER FLOW XMTR SF-C-1 B B SPENT FUEL COOLER Y 33 SWEL 2 C- 243 Table C-1 Page 4 of 5 C-5 12Q.108.70-R-O.1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed? | |||
By"B" SPENT FUEL COOLING SF-P-1B PUMP Y 33 SWEL 2 C- 246 PUMP __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _SF-P-iB-BK 1B ES MCC UNIT 6A SWEL 2, deferred due to Risk Management SF-PI B DISCH ISOL VLV TO SF-V-14 SP1BDSHIO VTO N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 249 BSF POOL SF-P 18 DISCH ISOL VLV TO SF-V-15 SP1BDSHIO VTO N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 252 A SF POOL SF-P 18 DISCH ISOL VALVE SF-V-116 SFP IC SLVLE N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 255 TO FTC SF-V-37 SF-P2 SUCT VLV FROM N/A 32 SWEL 2 C- 258 FUEL POOL A & B SF-V-38 A SF POOL DRAIN ISOL N/A 30 SWEL 2 C- 261 VALVE SF-V-4 SF-P1 B SUCT [SOL VLV N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 264 FROM B SF POOL A SF POOL SIPHON SF-V-48 AKER POOL VALVE N/A 32 SWEL 2 C- 267 BREAKER ISOL VALVE SF-V-5 SF-P 1 SUCT ISOL VLV N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 270 FROM A SF POOL SF-V-6 SF-P 1 SUCT ISOL VLV N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 273 FROM FTC TRB 120V REG AC INSTR. Y 24 C- 276 POWER TRB VBD 120V VITAL INST DIST Y 24 C- 279 PANELiD XCLA XCLA RELAY PANEL Y 23 C- 282 Table C-1 Page 5 of 5 C-6 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS CABINET 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET ROOM Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-7 12QO108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: 1B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS CABINET 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-I B, Rev 000 Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction. | |||
C-8 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS CABINET 1B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3606 100_3608 C-9 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1B-480V-ESF Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1B-480V-ESF VENT BUILDING MCC Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
AB, 305.00 ft, 9: NEAR RW PNL Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
C-1 0 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1B-480V-ESF Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1B-480V-ESF VENT BUILDING MCC Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-TI-1 B-480V-ESF Rev 000 This equipment has External Welds C-11 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1 B-480V-ESF (1) Motor Control Centers 1 B-480V-ESF VENT BUILDING MCC Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3730 100_3731 100_3732 100_3744 C-12 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 3B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 3B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET AREA Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-13 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F--] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 3B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 3B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes.Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -3B, Rev 000 Unistrut support behind cabinet is within 3" of cabinet, however, the cabinet is rigid enough to preclude any interaction. | |||
C-14 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
3B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 3B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3617 100_3618 C-15 12001 08.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 4B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET AREA Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes Yes C-16 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 4B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction. | |||
Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -4B, Rev 000 C-17 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 4B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 ASeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3639 100_3641 C-18 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 5B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET AREA Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-19 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 5B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Overhead light in front of cabinet needs S-Hook to be crimped. Not a seismic interaction issue. This issue was generically addressed by IR 1401692.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -5B, Rev 000 C-20 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 5B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B Panels and Cabinets Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3631 100_3632 C-21 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Fniiinmant r)P-Qrrintinn* | |||
5B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B 100_3637 C-22 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: 7Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-C-0004B Equipment Class: (11) Chillers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
' CONTROL BUILDING CHILLER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 285.00 ft, 17: CB CHILLER ROOM Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may beused to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-23 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-C-0004B Equipment Class: (11) Chillers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING CHILLER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments S-hook on overhead light between the two chillers needs to be crimped. Not a seismic interaction issue. This is being tracked under IR 01401692 Fire protection piping in non-seismic, however, it is seismically supported consistant with NFPA-13.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-AH-C-0004B, Rev 001 C-24 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AH-C-0004B3 (11) Chillers CONTROL BUILDING CHILLER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3668 100_3669 100_3672 C-25 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0008A Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A FAN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
FB, 305.00 ft, 33 : ABOVE SPENT FUEL POOL Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-26 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0008A Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -AH-E-0008A, Rev 000 Able to verify anchorage from floor elevation. | |||
The only spring can that could not be verified was the one adjacent to the wall.C-27 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AH-E-0008A (9) Fans SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos C-28 12Q0108.70-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0015B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH PUMPS Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
AB, 305.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-29 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0015B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH PUMPS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-T1-AH-E-0015B Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-30 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AH-E-OO1 5B (10) Air Handlers AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH PUMPS Photos Photos 100_3804 100_3806 C-31 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0024B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERG FEED PUMP COOLER FAN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 7: N ABOVE IA-P-1A Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-32 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0024B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERG FEED PUMP COOLER FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Based on inspection from floor level, could not access the ceiling.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-AH-E-0024B, Rev 000 C-33 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0024B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERG FEED PUMP COOLER FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1122 IMG_1123 IMG_1131 C-34 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y [j-j U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-18B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING EMERG B SUPPLY FAN Project: TMI SWEL CB, 380.00 ft, 25: 5TH FLOOR CONTROL TOWER (B) FAN EQUIPMEN Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
T ROOM Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
No C-35 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y Fj U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-18B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING EMERG B SUPPLY FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Fan was found with 4 of 6 anchor bolts missing. Based on the low floor response and the relatively light weight of the fan assembly, the remaining bolts were sufficient to restrain the equipment. | |||
The Shift Manager was notified and the missing anchorage was immediately installed under IR 1400723.C-36 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y L-NI U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-18B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING EMERG B SUPPLY FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3175 100_3177 100_3178 100_3368 C-37 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-19B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING B RETURN AIR FAN-Project: | |||
TMI SWEL CB, 380.00 ft, 26: CONTROL BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR, "B" EQUIPME NT Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
ROOM Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-38 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-19B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING B RETURN AIR FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments See Drawing 4W-66468 Sheet 14 dated 8-5-68 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-39 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AH-E-1 9B (9) Fans CONTROL BUILDING B RETURN AIR FAN Photos 100_3162 100_3163 C-40 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-1B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
REACTOR BLDG COOLING FAN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
RB, 305.00 ft, 40: RB BASEMENT AT AH-E-1B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-41 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-1B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
REACTOR BLDG COOLING FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments See SQ-T1-AH-E-0001B Rev 0 Only Outside Support was inspected. | |||
Inside equipment (e.g. fan) was inaccessible. | |||
C-42 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-1B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
REACTC)R BLDG COOLING FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Juan A. L6pez 10/9/12 Photos 100_4130 100_4132 C-43 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-11B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
REACTOR BLDG COOLING FAN I1UU-41 i3i C-44 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-95B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN Project: TMI SWEL CB, 322.00 ft, 18 : 322' CONTROL BUILDING 10' ABOVE 1S 480V Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
SWITCHGEAR. | |||
Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-45 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-95B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-826-001, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-46 12Q0108.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-95B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONTROL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN Photos 100 3420 C-47 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BS-PS-0933 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR ESAS ACTUATION Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
AB, 305.00 ft, 13: ON RB WALL ABOVE IC-F-1A Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-48 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BS-PS-0933 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR ESAS ACTUATION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-Ti-BS-PS0286/0933 Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 S-Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-49 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BS-PS-0933 (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR ESAS ACTUATION Photos 100_3814 100_3819 C-50 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MJ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.:. CO-LT-1061 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK A LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: NW CORNER OF HALLWAY Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-51 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1 061 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK A LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Lighting mounting appears to be rigid, but cannot be verified because the light is flush with the wall.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -CO-LT-1 061, REV 000 C-52 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CO-LT-1 061 (18) Instruments on Racks CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK A LEVEL TRANSMITTER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3336 100_3340 C-53 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1062 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: HALLWAY Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes Yes C-54 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1062 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -CO-LT-1 062, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-55 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1062 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photos 100_3346 100_3349 C-56 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1063 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: HALLWAY Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item.of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?' | |||
Yes C-57 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1063 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-CO-LT-1 063, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-58 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1063 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photos 100_3354 C-59 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-T-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
YD, 305.00 ft, 8: N.W. OF REACT BLDG Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-60 | |||
........ ........ ..... ....., 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-T-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Slightly bent anchor bolt near manhole. Based on review of SQUG SEWS, there is adequate margin to ignore the effects of a single bent anchor bolt.Several linear indications emanate from anchor bolts, which are already addressed in the SQUG SEWS.See SQ-T1-CO-T-0001B, Revision 001 C-61 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-T-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 A Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1168 IMG_1171 1MG_1172 IMG_1173 C-62 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Eauioment Descrintion: | |||
CO-T-OOO1 B (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B IMG_1174 IMG_1175 C-63 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-V-0010B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
YD, 305.00 ft, 8: INSIDE VALVE HOUSE Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-64 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-V-001OB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-T1 -CO-V-0Ol OB Rev 000 C-65 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-V-0010B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 1MG_1179 IMG_1181 C-66 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CRD-CB-1D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 338.50 ft, 27 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-67 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CRD-CB-1D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed. | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -CRD-CB-1 A/1 D,REV 000 The file name is: SQ-T1-CRD-CB-1A/1D (NUMBER ABBREVIATED FOR PIMS CONSTRAINT OF 20 CHARACTERS | |||
-ORIGINAL NUMBER IS SQ-T1-CRD-CB-1A/1B/iC/1D) | |||
Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 C-68 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CRD-CB-1D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 1uu_ obv 1UU_3Ot4 C-69 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-FI-1151 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-P-1C/1D TO DF-T-2B FLOW INDICATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 35 : "B"DG BLDG @ DF-T-2B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification-is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-70 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-FI-1 151 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-P-1C/1D TO DF-T-2B FLOW INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Yes Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DF-FI-1 151, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth .W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-71 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DF-FI-1 151 (18) Instruments on Racks EDG/FUEL OIUDF-P-1 C/1D TO DF-T-2B FLOW INDICATOR Photos 100_3079 100_3080 C-72 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-LI-J500B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B LEVEL INDICATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37: "B"DG BLDG Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-73 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-LI-J500B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B LEVEL INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Yes Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Not Applicable Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-DF-LI-J500B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-74 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-LI-J500B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B LEVEL INDICATOR Photos 100_3112 C-75 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL TRANSFER PUMP B (DC)Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 38 : "A" DG BLDG Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-76 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL TRANSFER PUMP B (DC)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DF-P-0001 B, Rev 001 Electrical elbow is loose, not a seismic concern. This is an electrical code issue. IR 1400586 is addressing this.C-77 12Qo108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DF-P-00011B (5) Horizontal Pumps EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL TRANSFER PUMP B (DC)Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3121 100_3124 100_3127 C-78 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Ei] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-T-0002B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG FUEL OIL/EG-Y-1B DAY TANK Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 : "B" DG BLDG NORTH WALL Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-79 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-T-0002B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG FUEL OIL/EG-Y-1B DAY TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments SQ-Ti-DF-T-0002B, Rev 000 New supports as recommended by SQ-T1 -DF-T-0002B were addressed with modification package T1-CCD-412636-239, Rev 000.C-80 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-T-0002B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG FUEL OILIEG-Y-1B DAY TANK Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3076 C-81 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.:.RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DH-V-0005B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BWST TO DH PUMPS Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
AB, 281.00 ft, 15: ON DIVIDING WALLS. FACE Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-82 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DH-V-0005B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BWST TO DH PUMPS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments In-line equipment. | |||
Boric acid leak has been previously identified under IR 426184 and is currently tracked under the site Boric Acid Program." Refer to IR 1401947 for additional details.See SQ-T1-DH-V-0005B, Revision 000 C-83 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DH-V-0005B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BWSTTO DH PUMPS Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3875 C-84 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: DR-P-1B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (BIdg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IPH, 308.00 ft, 28: UNIT ONE SCREEN HOUSE EAST SIDE Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-85 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DR-P-1B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DR-P-1 B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-86 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DR-P-1iB Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Photos 100_3720 100_3722 C-87 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: DR-S-1B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DECAY RIVER STRAINER Project: TMI SWEL IPH, 308.00 ft, 28: UNIT ONE SCREEN HOUSE BETWEEN DR-P-1B AN Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
D DR-V-1B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
C-88 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DR-S-1B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DECAY RIVER STRAINER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DR-S-1 B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-89 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
DR-S-l B (0) Other DECAY RIVER STRAINER Photos 1MG-1190 IMG_1194 C-90 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: r-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-B-1B Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
250V DC STATION BATTERY 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 22: BATTERY ROOM B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-91 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-B-1B Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
250V DC STATION BATTERY 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-TI-I B-BATTERY, Revision 001 Gap between battery 33 and end rail addressed under IR 1401981.Per TMI Engineering, the gap which was visually observed varied linearly along the battery west end-rail from 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch. Approximately two-thirds of the battery cells west end rail gap was less than 3/16 inch.During a Safe Shutdown Earthquake, the battery cells points of first contact will be those areas along the battery and end rail which have a gap of less than 3/16 inch. As such, the seismic capability of cell No. 33 is not C-92 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-B-1B Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
250V DC STATION BATTERY 1B diminished, its full seismic qualification unchanged, and the observed gap consistent with IEEE Std 450-2002 IEEE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR MAINTENANCE, TESTING, AND REPLACEMENT, Annex E.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3530 100_3533 C-93 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1 B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 11B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM 1B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-94 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 1 B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Internal Inspections has been performed through the bottom and center Grating.Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-BATT CHG 1 B, Rev 000 AND DRAWING NBC-406 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-95 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: L-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EED-BC-1 B (16) Inverters BATTERY CHARGER 1 B Photos 100_3439 100 3438 C-96 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1D Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 1D Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM 1B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
C-97 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1D Equipment Class: (16) lnverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 1D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Internal Inspections has been performed through the bottom and center Grating.Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -BATT CHG 1D, Rev 000 AND DRAWING NBC-406 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-98 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1D Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 1D Photos 100_3444 100_3446 C-99 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 1F Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM 1B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-100 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
BATTERY CHARGER 1F Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Internal Inspections has been performed through the bottom and center Grating.Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-BATT CHG 1F, Rev 000 AND DRAWING NBC-406 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-101 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EED-BC-1 F (16) Inverters BATTERY CHARGER 1F Photos 100 3451 100_3453 100_3462 C-102 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
INVERTER 1B ELEL6 Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-103 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
INVERTER lB ELEL6 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EE-INV-1 B, Rev 001/7 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos C-104 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: | |||
DpAqrrintinn" EE-INVT 1B (16) Inverters INVERTER 1B R FEFL 1UU J4b(luu_34(z C-105 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1F INVERTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: CONTROL TWR 322: A INVERTER ROOM Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-106 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1F INVERTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EE-INV-1 F, Rev 001 Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction. | |||
C-107 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
1F INVERTER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100 3504 100_3505 100 3507 C-108 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-PNL-VBB Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
VBB 120 VAC PANEL Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 322.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-109 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-PNL-VBB Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
VBB 120 VAC PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed, Comments New Anchorage is installed consistent with modification No. T1-MM-412552-002 Rev 000 and drawings 521-253.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-110 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-PNL-VBB Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
VBB 120 VAC PANEL Photos 100 3474 100_3476 100_3478 C-111 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-FT-0782 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EFWTO B OTSG FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 6: E WALL BEHIND AE-42 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-112 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-FT-0782 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EFW TO B OTSG FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EF-FT-0782, Rev 001-.4ýEvaluated by: Mark S. Etre Seth W. Baker Date: 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 C-113 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EF-FT-0782 (18) Instruments on Racks EFW TO B OTSG FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos IMG_1107 C-114 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0001 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
STEAM DRIVEN EMERGENCY FEED PUMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 5: EF-P-1 CUBICLE Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-115 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0001 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
STEAM DRIVEN EMERGENCY FEED PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Pump is not centered on pad. This was verified to be documented and evaluated in SQ-Ti-EF-P-0001 Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-EF-P-0001 ,REV 000 C-116 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EF-P-0001 (5) Horizontal Pumps STEAM DRIVEN EMERGENCY FEED PUMP Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3372 100_3374 100_3377 C-117 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0002B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 6: EF-P-1B CUBICLE Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes Yes Yes Yes C-118 | |||
... ...... ....... ...... ....,° , 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0002B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Hairline linear indications (Concrete Cracks) emanating from Anchor Bolt. SQ-Ti-EF-P-0002B confirms that there is margin and acceptable. | |||
Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-EF-P-0002B, Rev 001 C-119 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0002B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1093 IMG_1096 C-120 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-00011B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EFW PUMPS SUCTION CROSS CONNECT VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 5: NE OF EF-P-1 UNDER PLATFORM Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-121 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0001B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EFW PUMPS SUCTION CROSS CONNECT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Anchorage check not applicable because equipment is in-line.See SQ-T1-EF-V-0001B, Revision 001 C-122 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EF-V-0001 B (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EFW PUMPS SUCTION CROSS CONNECT VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMU 1Udz C-123 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: E OF EF-P-2B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-124 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Anchorage check is not applicable. | |||
This is in-line equipment. | |||
Drain line above valve EF-V-0004 does not contain water.Minor oil leakage on valve.See SQ-T1-EF-V-0004, Revision 001 C-125 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3325 100_3327 C-126 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment DescriDtion: | |||
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW 100 3333 C-127 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0030B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EFW TO OTSG B FLOW CTRL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 295.00 ft, 6: E OF EF-P-2B AT Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-128 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0030B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EFW TO OTSG B FLOW CTRL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Anchorage check is not applicable. | |||
This is in-line equipment. | |||
See SQ-Ti-EF-V-0030B, Revision 000 C-129 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EF-V-0030B (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EFW TO OTSG B FLOW CTRL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG 1111 1MG_1112 C-130 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-2D Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG B AIR COOLER B RADIATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 35: RADIATOR ENCLOSURE AREA EG-Y-1B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant.documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-131 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-2D Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG B AIR COOLER B RADIATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments INSTALLATION IS CONSISTANT WITH DRAWING 11866396 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-132 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-2D Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG B AIR COOLER B RADIATOR Photos 100_3143 C-133 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-3B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG B AIR COOLER A RADIATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 35: RADIATOR ENCLOSURE AREA EG-Y-11B Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-134 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-3B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG B AIR COOLER A RADIATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments INSTALLATION IS CONSISTANT WITH DRAWING 11866396 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-135 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-38 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG B AIR COOLER A RADIATOR Photos 100_3146 C-136 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-P-0001B Equipment Class: (12) Air Compressors Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 : "B" DG BLDG Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. 1 Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?. (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-137 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-P-00011B Equipment Class: (12) Air Compressors Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-P-0001 B, Rev 001 Overhead light attached to air duct addressed in SQUG SEWS.C-138 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-P-0001B Equipment Class: (12) Air Compressors Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012" Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100 3047 100_3049 C-139 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-0001 B-1 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG 1B AIR START 1 RESERVOIR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-140 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.: | |||
EG-T-000113-1 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG 1B AIR START 1 RESERVOIR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-T-0001 B-1, Rev 000 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-141 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EG-T-OOO1 B-i (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers EDG 1 B AIR START 1 RESERVOIR Photos 100 3054 100_3055 100 3056 C-142 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-0001B-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG 1B AIR START 2 RESERVOIR TANK Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-143 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-00011B-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG 1B AIR START 2 RESERVOIR TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-T-0001 B-2, Rev 000 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-144 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-00011B-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EDG 1B AIR START 2 RESERVOIR TANK Photos 100 3068 100_3070 100_3071 C-145 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-Y-0001B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-146 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-Y-0001B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-Y-0001 B, Rev 002 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-147 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
EG-Y-OOO11B (17) Engine-Generators EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Photos 100 3084 100_3093 100_3094 C-148 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: HSPS-CH-2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
HSPS CHANNEL 2 Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
CB, 338.50 ft, 27 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-149 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: HSPS-CH-2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
HSPS CHANNEL 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed. | |||
Comments Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction. | |||
Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -HSPS-CAB-A2, Rev 001.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-150 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
HSPS-CH-2 (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets HSPS CHANNEL 2 Photos 100 3550 f- '9 100_3553 I1uu jo2ob C-151 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0007B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" TRAIN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-152 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0007B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" TRAIN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-TI -IA-T-0007B, Rev 000 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-153 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: v N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0007B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" TRAIN Photos 100_3101 C-154 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
IB, 322.00 ft, 1 : ON WALL EAST OF VALVE Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-155 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments See SQ-Ti-IA-T-0019, Revision 001 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-156 12Qo108.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
IA-T-0019 (0) Other AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B Photos IMU.1 ~14U C-157 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B IMU 1146 C-158 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-PT-1184 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
OTSG "B" STEAM PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | |||
RB, 308.00 ft, 39: "D" MS LINE ACROSS FROM STAIRS Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | |||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
Yes C-159 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-PT-1184 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
OTSG "B" STEAM PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments See SQ-T1-MS-PT-1184, Rev 0 Conduit lid nearby above equipment one bolt of two installed as documented in IR 1404814. Not an issue Seismically, electrical personnel issue.C-160 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-PT-1184 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | |||
Description:== | |||
OTSG "B" STEAM PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Juan A. Lc6pez 10/9/12 Photos 100_4061 100 4053 C-161}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 21 July 2018
| ML12362A042 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/2012 |
| From: | Delaney M Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RS-12-175, TMI-12-161 12Q0108.70-R-001, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML12362A042 (161) | |
Text
12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 C Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Table C-1 provides a description of each item, anchorage verification confirmation, a list of Area Walk-By Checklists associated with each item, comments, and page numbers of each Seismic Walkdown Checklist.
C-1 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Table C-1. Summary of Seismic Walkdown Checklists Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed?
By ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS Y 20 C- 7 CABINET 1B DIESEL GEN 1B -ENGINE Deferred -risk CONTROL RELAY PANEL management 1B-480V-ES 480V ENGINEERED N 18 Deferred for anchorage SAFEGUARDS MCC 1 B inspection 1 B-480V-ESF VENT 1B-480V-ESF BUILDING VEN Y 9 C- 10_____ ____BUILDING MCC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1B ENGINEERED Deferred to bus outage 1B-480V-ESV SAFEGUARDS VALVES & N 10 for anchorage inspection HEATING CONTROL CENTR for anchrageinspctio 480V SCREEN HOUSE Deferred to bus outage 1B-480V-SHES ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS N 29 for anchorage inspection MCC 1B for ancorgeinsecio 4160V ENGINEERED Deferred to bus outage 1E-4160V-ES SAFEGUARDS BUS 1E N 21 for anchorage inspection 125/250V DC ES DIST PANEL Deferred -risk 1 F N management 125/25OVDC DIST PANEL Deferred -risk FOR EDG 1B management 1S-480V-ES 480V ENGINEERED N 18 Deferred for anchorage SWGR SAFEGUARDS BUS 1S inspection 1S-480V-ES 1S 480V ES SWGR N 18 Deferred for anchorage XFMR 4160/480V XFMR N inspection 480V ENGINEERED Deferred to bus outage 1T-480V-SHES SAFEGUARDS SCREEN N 29 for anchorage inspection HOUSE BUS 1T for anchrageinspctio 1iT-48V-SHES-1GT 480V SCREEN HOUSE ES Deferred to bus outage XFMR SWGR 4160/480V XFMR N 29 for anchorage inspection 3B ESAS ACTUATION CABINET Y 20 C-13 3B Y_20 C-______13__
3B ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Y 20 C- 16 4B 5B ESAS ACTUATION CABINET Y 20 C-19 5B Y_20 C-______19__
5B AH-C-0004B CONTROL BUILDING Y 17 C- 23 CHILLER AH-E-0008A SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A Y 33 C-26 FAN AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING AH-E-0015B UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH Y 12 C- 29_PUMPS I Table C-1 Page 1 of 5 C-2 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed?
By EMERG FEED PUMP AH-E-0024B N 7 C- 32 COOLER FAN CONTROL BUILDING AH-E-18B EOERG BUPLYFN N 25 C- 35 EMERG B SUPPLY FAN AH-E-19B CONTROL BUILDING B N 26 C- 38 RETURN AIR FAN AH-E-i1 B REACTOR BLDG COOLING Y 40 C- 41 FAN AH-E-95B CONTROL BUILDING 2ND Y 18 C- 45 FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR BS-PS-0933 ESSATAINY 13 C- 48 ESAS ACTUATION CONTROL RM CONSOLE Deferred -risk CENTER CONTROL PANEL management CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-LT-1061 TANK A LEVEL Y 4 C- 51 TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-LT-1 062 TANK B LEVEL Y 4 C- 54 TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-LT-1063 TANK B LEVEL Y C-57 TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE STORAGE CO-T-0001B Y 8 C-60 TANK 1B CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL CO-V-0010OB N/A 8 C- 64 VALVE CRD-CB-1D CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Y 27 C- 67 EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-P-1 C/1D DF-FI-1151 TO DF-T-2B FLOW N/A 37 C- 70 INDICATOR DF-LI-J500B EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B N/A 37 C- 73 LEVEL INDICATOR EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL DF-P-0001B TRANSFER PUMP B (DC) Y 38 C- 76 DF-T-0002B EDG FUEL OIL/EG-Y-1B DAY Y 37 C-79 TANK DH-T-0001 BWST N 8 Deferred -risk management DH-V-0005B BWST TO DH PUMPS N/A 15 C- 82 DR-P-1B DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Y 28 C- 85 DR-S-1 B DECAY RIVER STRAINER Y 28 C- 88 EED-B-i B 250V DC STATION BATTERY Y 22 C- 9i D1B C EED-BC-1B IBATTERY CHARGER 1 B Y 124 C- 94d Table C-1 Page 2 of 5 C-3 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed?
By EED-BC-1 D BATTERY CHARGER 1 D Y 24 C- 97 EED-BC-1F BATTERY CHARGER 1F Y 24 C- 100 125/250V DC DIST PANEL 1B Deferred -risk EED-PNL-1B N 24 mngmn __management EE-INV-1B INVERTER 1B ELEL6 Y 24 C- 103 EE-INV-1F 1F INVERTER Y 24 C- 106 EE-PNL-VBB VBB 120 VAC PANEL Y 24 C-109 EFW TO B OTSG FLOW EF-FT-0782 Y 6 C- 112 TRANSMITTER STEAM DRIVEN EF-P-0001 Y 5 C- 115 EMERGENCY FEED PUMP EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Y 6 EF-P-0002B Y6C- 118 EFW PUMPS SUCTION EF-V-0001 B N/A 5 C- 121________CROSS CONNECT VALVEN/5 EMERG RIVER WATER TO EF-V-0004 N/A 4 C- 124 EFW EF-V-0030B EFW TO OTSG B FLOW N/A 6 C- 128 CTRL VALVE EG-C-2D EDGBAIRCOOLERB Y 35 C- 131 RADIATOR EDG B AIR COOLER A EG-C-3B RADIATOR Y 35 C- 134 RADIATOR EG-P-0001 B EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING Y 37 C-137 AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR EG-T-0001B-1 EDG lBAIR START 1 Y 37 C- 140 RESERVOIR EG-T-0001B-2 EDG1BAIRSTART2 Y 37 C-143 RESERVOIR TANK EG-Y-0001B EMERGENCY DIESEL Y 37 C- 146 GENERATOR 1B HSPS-CH-2 HSPS CHANNEL 2 Y 27 C- 149 2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" IA-T-0007B TANY 37 C- 152 TRAIN IA-T-0019 AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR Y 1 C- 155 FW-V-16B/17B MS-PT-1 184 OTSG "B" STEAMC-159 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER CONT ISOL B OTSG MS MS-V-0001C IOL VALVE Y 44 C- 162 ISOL VALVE CONT ISOL B OTSG ISOL TO MS-V-0002B N/A 5 C- 165 ATMOS MS-V-0004B ATMOSPHERIC DUMP N/A 5 C- 168 VALVE FOR 'B' OTSG MU-FT-i 127 HPI THRU MU-V-16B FLOW Y 15 C- 171 TRANSMITTER I I I I_ I Table C-1 Page 3 of 5 C-4 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed?
By MU-FT-I 128 HPI THRU MU-V-16C FLOW Y 13 C- 174 TRANSMITTER HPI THROUGH MU-V-16D MU-FT-i1129 Y 31 C- 177 FLOW TRANSMITTER MU-P-0001B MAKEUP PUMP 1B Y 14 C- 180 MU-V-0003 CONTAINMENT ISOL LD N/A 15 C- 183 COOLER ISOL VLV NR-P-0001B NUC SVC COOL RIVER Y 28 C- 186 WATER 'B' PUMP NR-V-0001B NUC PUMP RIVER PUMP B N/A 28 C- 189 DISCH VLV NR-V-0004B DEICING MU VALVE B N/A 16 C- 192 NUCLEAR SERVICES NS-C-0001B CLOSED COOLING WATER Y 16 C- 195 HEAT EXCHANGER 1B NS-P-0001B NUC SVC CLOSED Y 11 C- 198 COOLING WATER 'B' PUMP CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-NS-V-0052B N 3 C- 201 1 B MTR COOLER SUPPLY CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-NS-V-0053B N 3 C- 204 1 B MTR COOLER RETURN SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP NS-V-0054B ROOM COOLING COIL N/A 33 C- 207 FLOW CONTROL VLV RC-RV-0002 PILOT OPERATED RELIEF N/A 42 C- 210 VALVE (PORV)RC-V-0002 PORV BLOCK VALVE N/A 42 C- 213 RB EMERG COOL RIVER RR-P-0001B RB PUMP Y 29 C- 216 WTR 'B' PUMP RR-S-0001B RB EMERG CLNG RIVER Y 29 C- 219 WTR 'B' STRAINER RR-S-1B RR-S-1B CONTROL PANEL N 29 C- 222 CONTAINMENT ISOL RBEC RR-V-0003A N/A 2 C- 225 COIL 'A' INLET VLV. __ ________RR-V-6 RB COOL COIL RR-V-0005 N/A 3 C- 228 DISCH BYPASS RB EMERG. COOL COIL RR-V-0006 BACK PRESSURE N/A 3 C- 231 REGULATOR SF2-DPT SF-P-2 FLOW TRANSMITTER Y 30 SWEL 2 C- 234 SF9-DPT-1 B SF POOL COOLING Y 34 SWEL 2 C- 237 WATER FLOW XMTR SF9-DPT-2 A SF POOL COOLING Y 34 SWEL 2 C- 240 WATER FLOW XMTR SF-C-1 B B SPENT FUEL COOLER Y 33 SWEL 2 C- 243 Table C-1 Page 4 of 5 C-5 12Q.108.70-R-O.1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Anchorage Area ID Description Configuration Walk- Comments Page Confirmed?
By"B" SPENT FUEL COOLING SF-P-1B PUMP Y 33 SWEL 2 C- 246 PUMP __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _SF-P-iB-BK 1B ES MCC UNIT 6A SWEL 2, deferred due to Risk Management SF-PI B DISCH ISOL VLV TO SF-V-14 SP1BDSHIO VTO N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 249 BSF POOL SF-P 18 DISCH ISOL VLV TO SF-V-15 SP1BDSHIO VTO N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 252 A SF POOL SF-P 18 DISCH ISOL VALVE SF-V-116 SFP IC SLVLE N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 255 TO FTC SF-V-37 SF-P2 SUCT VLV FROM N/A 32 SWEL 2 C- 258 FUEL POOL A & B SF-V-38 A SF POOL DRAIN ISOL N/A 30 SWEL 2 C- 261 VALVE SF-V-4 SF-P1 B SUCT [SOL VLV N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 264 FROM B SF POOL A SF POOL SIPHON SF-V-48 AKER POOL VALVE N/A 32 SWEL 2 C- 267 BREAKER ISOL VALVE SF-V-5 SF-P 1 SUCT ISOL VLV N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 270 FROM A SF POOL SF-V-6 SF-P 1 SUCT ISOL VLV N/A 33 SWEL 2 C- 273 FROM FTC TRB 120V REG AC INSTR. Y 24 C- 276 POWER TRB VBD 120V VITAL INST DIST Y 24 C- 279 PANELiD XCLA XCLA RELAY PANEL Y 23 C- 282 Table C-1 Page 5 of 5 C-6 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS CABINET 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET ROOM Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-7 12QO108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: 1B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS CABINET 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-I B, Rev 000 Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction.
C-8 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS CABINET 1B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3606 100_3608 C-9 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1B-480V-ESF Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
==
Description:==
1B-480V-ESF VENT BUILDING MCC Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AB, 305.00 ft, 9: NEAR RW PNL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-1 0 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1B-480V-ESF Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
==
Description:==
1B-480V-ESF VENT BUILDING MCC Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-TI-1 B-480V-ESF Rev 000 This equipment has External Welds C-11 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1 B-480V-ESF (1) Motor Control Centers 1 B-480V-ESF VENT BUILDING MCC Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3730 100_3731 100_3732 100_3744 C-12 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 3B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 3B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET AREA Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-13 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F--] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 3B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 3B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes.Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -3B, Rev 000 Unistrut support behind cabinet is within 3" of cabinet, however, the cabinet is rigid enough to preclude any interaction.
C-14 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
3B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 3B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3617 100_3618 C-15 12001 08.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 4B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET AREA Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes C-16 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 4B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction.
Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -4B, Rev 000 C-17 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 4B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 4B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 ASeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3639 100_3641 C-18 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 5B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 338.50 ft, 20: ESAS CABINET AREA Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-19 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 5B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Overhead light in front of cabinet needs S-Hook to be crimped. Not a seismic interaction issue. This issue was generically addressed by IR 1401692.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -5B, Rev 000 C-20 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 5B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Equipment
==
Description:==
ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B Panels and Cabinets Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3631 100_3632 C-21 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Fniiinmant r)P-Qrrintinn*
5B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ESAS ACTUATION CABINET 5B 100_3637 C-22 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: 7Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-C-0004B Equipment Class: (11) Chillers Equipment
==
Description:==
' CONTROL BUILDING CHILLER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 285.00 ft, 17: CB CHILLER ROOM Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may beused to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-23 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-C-0004B Equipment Class: (11) Chillers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING CHILLER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments S-hook on overhead light between the two chillers needs to be crimped. Not a seismic interaction issue. This is being tracked under IR 01401692 Fire protection piping in non-seismic, however, it is seismically supported consistant with NFPA-13.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-AH-C-0004B, Rev 001 C-24 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
AH-C-0004B3 (11) Chillers CONTROL BUILDING CHILLER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3668 100_3669 100_3672 C-25 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0008A Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A FAN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FB, 305.00 ft, 33 : ABOVE SPENT FUEL POOL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-26 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0008A Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -AH-E-0008A, Rev 000 Able to verify anchorage from floor elevation.
The only spring can that could not be verified was the one adjacent to the wall.C-27 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
AH-E-0008A (9) Fans SPENT FUEL PUMP ROOM A FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos C-28 12Q0108.70-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0015B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH PUMPS Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AB, 305.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-29 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0015B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH PUMPS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-T1-AH-E-0015B Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-30 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
AH-E-OO1 5B (10) Air Handlers AUX BLDG- AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR NSCCW & DH PUMPS Photos Photos 100_3804 100_3806 C-31 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0024B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERG FEED PUMP COOLER FAN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 7: N ABOVE IA-P-1A Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-32 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0024B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERG FEED PUMP COOLER FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Based on inspection from floor level, could not access the ceiling.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-AH-E-0024B, Rev 000 C-33 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-0024B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERG FEED PUMP COOLER FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1122 IMG_1123 IMG_1131 C-34 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y [j-j U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-18B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING EMERG B SUPPLY FAN Project: TMI SWEL CB, 380.00 ft, 25: 5TH FLOOR CONTROL TOWER (B) FAN EQUIPMEN Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
T ROOM Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No C-35 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y Fj U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-18B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING EMERG B SUPPLY FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Fan was found with 4 of 6 anchor bolts missing. Based on the low floor response and the relatively light weight of the fan assembly, the remaining bolts were sufficient to restrain the equipment.
The Shift Manager was notified and the missing anchorage was immediately installed under IR 1400723.C-36 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y L-NI U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-18B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING EMERG B SUPPLY FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3175 100_3177 100_3178 100_3368 C-37 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-19B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING B RETURN AIR FAN-Project:
TMI SWEL CB, 380.00 ft, 26: CONTROL BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR, "B" EQUIPME NT Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
ROOM Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-38 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-19B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING B RETURN AIR FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments See Drawing 4W-66468 Sheet 14 dated 8-5-68 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-39 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
AH-E-1 9B (9) Fans CONTROL BUILDING B RETURN AIR FAN Photos 100_3162 100_3163 C-40 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-1B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
REACTOR BLDG COOLING FAN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 305.00 ft, 40: RB BASEMENT AT AH-E-1B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-41 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-1B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
REACTOR BLDG COOLING FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments See SQ-T1-AH-E-0001B Rev 0 Only Outside Support was inspected.
Inside equipment (e.g. fan) was inaccessible.
C-42 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-1B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
REACTC)R BLDG COOLING FAN Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Juan A. L6pez 10/9/12 Photos 100_4130 100_4132 C-43 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-11B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
REACTOR BLDG COOLING FAN I1UU-41 i3i C-44 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-95B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN Project: TMI SWEL CB, 322.00 ft, 18 : 322' CONTROL BUILDING 10' ABOVE 1S 480V Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
SWITCHGEAR.
Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-45 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-95B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-826-001, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-46 12Q0108.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: AH-E-95B Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL BUILDING 2ND FLOOR B BOOSTER FAN Photos 100 3420 C-47 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BS-PS-0933 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR ESAS ACTUATION Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AB, 305.00 ft, 13: ON RB WALL ABOVE IC-F-1A Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-48 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BS-PS-0933 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR ESAS ACTUATION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-Ti-BS-PS0286/0933 Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 S-Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-49 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
BS-PS-0933 (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets RB PRESSURE SWITCH FOR ESAS ACTUATION Photos 100_3814 100_3819 C-50 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MJ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.:. CO-LT-1061 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK A LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: NW CORNER OF HALLWAY Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-51 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1 061 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK A LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Lighting mounting appears to be rigid, but cannot be verified because the light is flush with the wall.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -CO-LT-1 061, REV 000 C-52 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
CO-LT-1 061 (18) Instruments on Racks CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK A LEVEL TRANSMITTER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3336 100_3340 C-53 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1062 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: HALLWAY Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes C-54 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1062 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -CO-LT-1 062, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-55 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1062 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photos 100_3346 100_3349 C-56 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1063 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: HALLWAY Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item.of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?'
Yes C-57 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1063 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-CO-LT-1 063, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-58 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-LT-1063 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK B LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photos 100_3354 C-59 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-T-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
YD, 305.00 ft, 8: N.W. OF REACT BLDG Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-60
........ ........ ..... ....., 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-T-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Slightly bent anchor bolt near manhole. Based on review of SQUG SEWS, there is adequate margin to ignore the effects of a single bent anchor bolt.Several linear indications emanate from anchor bolts, which are already addressed in the SQUG SEWS.See SQ-T1-CO-T-0001B, Revision 001 C-61 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-T-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 A Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1168 IMG_1171 1MG_1172 IMG_1173 C-62 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Eauioment Descrintion:
CO-T-OOO1 B (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 1B IMG_1174 IMG_1175 C-63 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-V-0010B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
YD, 305.00 ft, 8: INSIDE VALVE HOUSE Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-64 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-V-001OB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification SQ-T1 -CO-V-0Ol OB Rev 000 C-65 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CO-V-0010B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONDENSATE TANK B ISOL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 1MG_1179 IMG_1181 C-66 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CRD-CB-1D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 338.50 ft, 27 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-67 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CRD-CB-1D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed.
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -CRD-CB-1 A/1 D,REV 000 The file name is: SQ-T1-CRD-CB-1A/1D (NUMBER ABBREVIATED FOR PIMS CONSTRAINT OF 20 CHARACTERS
-ORIGINAL NUMBER IS SQ-T1-CRD-CB-1A/1B/iC/1D)
Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 C-68 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CRD-CB-1D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD CIRCUIT BREAKER 1D Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 1uu_ obv 1UU_3Ot4 C-69 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-FI-1151 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-P-1C/1D TO DF-T-2B FLOW INDICATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 35 : "B"DG BLDG @ DF-T-2B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification-is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-70 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-FI-1 151 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-P-1C/1D TO DF-T-2B FLOW INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DF-FI-1 151, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth .W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-71 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
DF-FI-1 151 (18) Instruments on Racks EDG/FUEL OIUDF-P-1 C/1D TO DF-T-2B FLOW INDICATOR Photos 100_3079 100_3080 C-72 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-LI-J500B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B LEVEL INDICATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37: "B"DG BLDG Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-73 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-LI-J500B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B LEVEL INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Not Applicable Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-DF-LI-J500B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-74 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-LI-J500B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG/FUEL OIL/DF-T-2B LEVEL INDICATOR Photos 100_3112 C-75 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL TRANSFER PUMP B (DC)Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 38 : "A" DG BLDG Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-76 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL TRANSFER PUMP B (DC)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DF-P-0001 B, Rev 001 Electrical elbow is loose, not a seismic concern. This is an electrical code issue. IR 1400586 is addressing this.C-77 12Qo108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
DF-P-00011B (5) Horizontal Pumps EDG FUEL OIL/DIESEL FUEL TRANSFER PUMP B (DC)Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3121 100_3124 100_3127 C-78 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Ei] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-T-0002B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG FUEL OIL/EG-Y-1B DAY TANK Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 : "B" DG BLDG NORTH WALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-79 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-T-0002B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG FUEL OIL/EG-Y-1B DAY TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments SQ-Ti-DF-T-0002B, Rev 000 New supports as recommended by SQ-T1 -DF-T-0002B were addressed with modification package T1-CCD-412636-239, Rev 000.C-80 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DF-T-0002B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG FUEL OILIEG-Y-1B DAY TANK Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3076 C-81 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.:.RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DH-V-0005B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
BWST TO DH PUMPS Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AB, 281.00 ft, 15: ON DIVIDING WALLS. FACE Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-82 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DH-V-0005B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
BWST TO DH PUMPS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments In-line equipment.
Boric acid leak has been previously identified under IR 426184 and is currently tracked under the site Boric Acid Program." Refer to IR 1401947 for additional details.See SQ-T1-DH-V-0005B, Revision 000 C-83 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DH-V-0005B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
BWSTTO DH PUMPS Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3875 C-84 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: DR-P-1B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (BIdg, Elev, Room/Area):
IPH, 308.00 ft, 28: UNIT ONE SCREEN HOUSE EAST SIDE Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-85 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DR-P-1B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DR-P-1 B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-86 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DR-P-1iB Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
DECAY HEAT RIVER PMP Photos 100_3720 100_3722 C-87 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: DR-S-1B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
DECAY RIVER STRAINER Project: TMI SWEL IPH, 308.00 ft, 28: UNIT ONE SCREEN HOUSE BETWEEN DR-P-1B AN Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
D DR-V-1B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-88 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DR-S-1B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
DECAY RIVER STRAINER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -DR-S-1 B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-89 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
DR-S-l B (0) Other DECAY RIVER STRAINER Photos 1MG-1190 IMG_1194 C-90 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: r-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-B-1B Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
250V DC STATION BATTERY 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 22: BATTERY ROOM B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-91 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-B-1B Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
250V DC STATION BATTERY 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-TI-I B-BATTERY, Revision 001 Gap between battery 33 and end rail addressed under IR 1401981.Per TMI Engineering, the gap which was visually observed varied linearly along the battery west end-rail from 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch. Approximately two-thirds of the battery cells west end rail gap was less than 3/16 inch.During a Safe Shutdown Earthquake, the battery cells points of first contact will be those areas along the battery and end rail which have a gap of less than 3/16 inch. As such, the seismic capability of cell No. 33 is not C-92 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-B-1B Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
250V DC STATION BATTERY 1B diminished, its full seismic qualification unchanged, and the observed gap consistent with IEEE Std 450-2002 IEEE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR MAINTENANCE, TESTING, AND REPLACEMENT, Annex E.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3530 100_3533 C-93 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1 B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 11B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM 1B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-94 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 1 B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internal Inspections has been performed through the bottom and center Grating.Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-BATT CHG 1 B, Rev 000 AND DRAWING NBC-406 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-95 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: L-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EED-BC-1 B (16) Inverters BATTERY CHARGER 1 B Photos 100_3439 100 3438 C-96 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1D Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 1D Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM 1B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-97 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1D Equipment Class: (16) lnverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 1D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internal Inspections has been performed through the bottom and center Grating.Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -BATT CHG 1D, Rev 000 AND DRAWING NBC-406 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-98 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1D Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 1D Photos 100_3444 100_3446 C-99 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 1F Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM 1B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-100 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EED-BC-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
BATTERY CHARGER 1F Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internal Inspections has been performed through the bottom and center Grating.Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-BATT CHG 1F, Rev 000 AND DRAWING NBC-406 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-101 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EED-BC-1 F (16) Inverters BATTERY CHARGER 1F Photos 100 3451 100_3453 100_3462 C-102 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INVERTER 1B ELEL6 Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: INVERTER ROOM B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-103 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1B Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INVERTER lB ELEL6 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EE-INV-1 B, Rev 001/7 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos C-104 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class:
DpAqrrintinn" EE-INVT 1B (16) Inverters INVERTER 1B R FEFL 1UU J4b(luu_34(z C-105 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
1F INVERTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 24: CONTROL TWR 322: A INVERTER ROOM Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-106 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
1F INVERTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EE-INV-1 F, Rev 001 Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction.
C-107 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-INV-1F Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
1F INVERTER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100 3504 100_3505 100 3507 C-108 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-PNL-VBB Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
VBB 120 VAC PANEL Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 322.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-109 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-PNL-VBB Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
VBB 120 VAC PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed, Comments New Anchorage is installed consistent with modification No. T1-MM-412552-002 Rev 000 and drawings 521-253.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-110 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EE-PNL-VBB Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
VBB 120 VAC PANEL Photos 100 3474 100_3476 100_3478 C-111 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-FT-0782 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EFWTO B OTSG FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 6: E WALL BEHIND AE-42 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-112 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-FT-0782 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
EFW TO B OTSG FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EF-FT-0782, Rev 001-.4ýEvaluated by: Mark S. Etre Seth W. Baker Date: 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 C-113 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EF-FT-0782 (18) Instruments on Racks EFW TO B OTSG FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos IMG_1107 C-114 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0001 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
STEAM DRIVEN EMERGENCY FEED PUMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 5: EF-P-1 CUBICLE Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-115 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0001 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
STEAM DRIVEN EMERGENCY FEED PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Pump is not centered on pad. This was verified to be documented and evaluated in SQ-Ti-EF-P-0001 Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-EF-P-0001 ,REV 000 C-116 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EF-P-0001 (5) Horizontal Pumps STEAM DRIVEN EMERGENCY FEED PUMP Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3372 100_3374 100_3377 C-117 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0002B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 6: EF-P-1B CUBICLE Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes C-118
... ...... ....... ...... ....,° , 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0002B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Hairline linear indications (Concrete Cracks) emanating from Anchor Bolt. SQ-Ti-EF-P-0002B confirms that there is margin and acceptable.
Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-EF-P-0002B, Rev 001 C-119 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-P-0002B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FEED PUMP B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1093 IMG_1096 C-120 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-00011B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EFW PUMPS SUCTION CROSS CONNECT VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 5: NE OF EF-P-1 UNDER PLATFORM Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-121 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0001B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EFW PUMPS SUCTION CROSS CONNECT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Anchorage check not applicable because equipment is in-line.See SQ-T1-EF-V-0001B, Revision 001 C-122 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EF-V-0001 B (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EFW PUMPS SUCTION CROSS CONNECT VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMU 1Udz C-123 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 4: E OF EF-P-2B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-124 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Anchorage check is not applicable.
This is in-line equipment.
Drain line above valve EF-V-0004 does not contain water.Minor oil leakage on valve.See SQ-T1-EF-V-0004, Revision 001 C-125 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3325 100_3327 C-126 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment DescriDtion:
EMERG RIVER WATER TO EFW 100 3333 C-127 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0030B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EFW TO OTSG B FLOW CTRL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 295.00 ft, 6: E OF EF-P-2B AT Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-128 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EF-V-0030B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
EFW TO OTSG B FLOW CTRL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Anchorage check is not applicable.
This is in-line equipment.
See SQ-Ti-EF-V-0030B, Revision 000 C-129 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EF-V-0030B (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EFW TO OTSG B FLOW CTRL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG 1111 1MG_1112 C-130 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-2D Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG B AIR COOLER B RADIATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 35: RADIATOR ENCLOSURE AREA EG-Y-1B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant.documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-131 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-2D Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG B AIR COOLER B RADIATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments INSTALLATION IS CONSISTANT WITH DRAWING 11866396 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-132 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-2D Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG B AIR COOLER B RADIATOR Photos 100_3143 C-133 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-3B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG B AIR COOLER A RADIATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 35: RADIATOR ENCLOSURE AREA EG-Y-11B Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-134 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-3B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG B AIR COOLER A RADIATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments INSTALLATION IS CONSISTANT WITH DRAWING 11866396 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-135 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-C-38 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG B AIR COOLER A RADIATOR Photos 100_3146 C-136 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-P-0001B Equipment Class: (12) Air Compressors Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 : "B" DG BLDG Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. 1 Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?. (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-137 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-P-00011B Equipment Class: (12) Air Compressors Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-P-0001 B, Rev 001 Overhead light attached to air duct addressed in SQUG SEWS.C-138 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-P-0001B Equipment Class: (12) Air Compressors Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG LUBE OIL & STARTING AIR/AIR COMPRESSOR Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012" Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100 3047 100_3049 C-139 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-0001 B-1 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG 1B AIR START 1 RESERVOIR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-140 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.:
EG-T-000113-1 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG 1B AIR START 1 RESERVOIR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-T-0001 B-1, Rev 000 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-141 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EG-T-OOO1 B-i (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers EDG 1 B AIR START 1 RESERVOIR Photos 100 3054 100_3055 100 3056 C-142 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-0001B-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG 1B AIR START 2 RESERVOIR TANK Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-143 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-00011B-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG 1B AIR START 2 RESERVOIR TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-T-0001 B-2, Rev 000 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-144 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-T-00011B-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EDG 1B AIR START 2 RESERVOIR TANK Photos 100 3068 100_3070 100_3071 C-145 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-Y-0001B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-146 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EG-Y-0001B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -EG-Y-0001 B, Rev 002 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-147 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
EG-Y-OOO11B (17) Engine-Generators EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Photos 100 3084 100_3093 100_3094 C-148 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: HSPS-CH-2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
HSPS CHANNEL 2 Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CB, 338.50 ft, 27 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-149 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: HSPS-CH-2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
HSPS CHANNEL 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed.
Comments Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction.
Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -HSPS-CAB-A2, Rev 001.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-150 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
HSPS-CH-2 (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets HSPS CHANNEL 2 Photos 100 3550 f- '9 100_3553 I1uu jo2ob C-151 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0007B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" TRAIN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DG, 305.00 ft, 37 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-152 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0007B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" TRAIN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-TI -IA-T-0007B, Rev 000 Hairline linear indications (Cracks) in pad will be addressed in Maintenance Rule Inspection R2151812.R2151812 tracks completion of the walkdown and updates the topical report with its results. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern, this is within the acceptance criteria of ACI 349.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-153 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: v N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0007B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
2 HR AIR BOTTLE TO "B" TRAIN Photos 100_3101 C-154 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
IB, 322.00 ft, 1 : ON WALL EAST OF VALVE Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-155 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments See SQ-Ti-IA-T-0019, Revision 001 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-156 12Qo108.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
IA-T-0019 (0) Other AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B Photos IMU.1 ~14U C-157 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IA-T-0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
AIR ACCUMULATOR FOR FW-V-16B/17B IMU 1146 C-158 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-PT-1184 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
OTSG "B" STEAM PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 308.00 ft, 39: "D" MS LINE ACROSS FROM STAIRS Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-159 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-PT-1184 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
OTSG "B" STEAM PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments See SQ-T1-MS-PT-1184, Rev 0 Conduit lid nearby above equipment one bolt of two installed as documented in IR 1404814. Not an issue Seismically, electrical personnel issue.C-160 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-PT-1184 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
OTSG "B" STEAM PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Juan A. Lc6pez 10/9/12 Photos 100_4061 100 4053 C-161