ML13140A243

Comment (101) of Robert Schneider Opposing the Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2

ML13140A243
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	05/02/2013
From:	Schneider R - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00101, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13140A243 (1)

Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of. May 14, 2013 Received:

May 02, 2013 2g1 [4,A 1 p1 1 1Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION tracking No. ljx-853y-tbpz Comments Due: May 16, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECFIVED Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document:

NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0016 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 3 Submitter Information Name: Robert Schneider Address: 2111 SE Blairmont Dr.Vancouver, WA, 98683 General Comment While simply a member of the general public, I am a machinist and metalworker, and it's plain that there were some gross failings and attempts to circumvent the rules. First, Edison changes the designs, from capacities to internal configurations to the materials, attempts to pass this on as 'like for like'. Then I read Mitsubishi's analysis of the situation (a very good, and seemingly an honest review of the failures in the engineering process they used) in which they admitted using engineering assumptions from their previous designs and not running the fresh models or calculations, even if that which was contracted and supplied was not like their previous designs. So I ask the NRC, 'What's the problem?" Let Edison decide what to do with their pieces of junk. They chose to experiment, and it failed. They own it through their attempts to evade the rules in an unseemly manner. They, their management, and their stockholders should suffer the consequences for this. Do the public a favor, and be honest. Don't let them restart San Onofre #2. It's the least you can do.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add=9/ý-4 https ://www, fdms. gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=090000648 12b3 4c4&for...

05/14/2013