ML15289A314: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:9/1/2015 9/1/2015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079.htmJ PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PMReceived:
{{#Wiki_filter:9/1/2015 9/1/2015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079.htmJ PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PM Received:
August 31, 2015Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-som4 Comments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant Licenser'{Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare anStatement
August 31, 2015 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-som4 Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License r'{Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Statement
-/ -ipact77/ 7~9~-SDocument:
-/ -ipact 77/ 7~9~-S Document:
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079 Comment on'FR Doc # 20 15-15921~e97~ ~~7tSubmitter Information 9oName: LMH Anonymous  
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079 Comment on'FR Doc # 20 15-15921~e97~ ~~7t Submitter Information 9o Name: LMH Anonymous  
... , : "r,+,C ;':2;N,CoGeneral Comment)zIn addition to attached files, the NRC ought to consider the NO RENEWAL alternative completely; so that the public will get a full understanding of what will be required todecommission Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. What will need to be done and how long will it take and whatare the environmental implications?
... , : " r,+,C ;':2;N, Co General Comment)z In addition to attached files, the NRC ought to consider the NO RENEWAL alternative completely; so that the public will get a full understanding of what will be required to decommission Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. What will need to be done and how long will it take and what are the environmental implications?
Knowing that might make it clearer that it's advisable not to renew the license, but to start theclosing/clean-up processes sooner rather than later.There should also be a much fuller exploration in the BIS of what other analyses, policies andoptionsare available to the public to secure our energy future. There are abundant resources forcutting edge thinking and doing. As an example, there's the Rocky Mountain Institute-RMI.orgfocus on electricity generally and also their report on energy opportunities without San Onofre NPPhttp://www.rmi.
Knowing that might make it clearer that it's advisable not to renew the license, but to start the closing/clean-up processes sooner rather than later.There should also be a much fuller exploration in the BIS of what other analyses, policies and options are available to the public to secure our energy future. There are abundant resources for cutting edge thinking and doing. As an example, there's the Rocky Mountain Institute-RMI.org focus on electricity generally and also their report on energy opportunities without San Onofre NPP http://www.rmi.
org/rmi report re inventing fire in southern_california and how smaller can be betterhttp://blog.rmi.
org/rmi report re inventing fire in southern_california and how smaller can be better http://blog.rmi.
org/blog_20 14_10_20 micropowers~quiet__takeover Other factors to consider are included in the attached  
org/blog_20 14_10_20 micropowers~quiet__takeover Other factors to consider are included in the attached .pdf See attached file(s)file:lllC  
.pdf See attached file(s)file:lllC  
:IU sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html I/1/2 9/1/12015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0079.html After repeated messages from this site that you can't find my uploaded files, I include this link which expresses those views (related to NRC 8/5/2015 meeting in San Luis Obispo) which I endorse http ://mothersforpeace.
:IU sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html I/1/2 9/1/12015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0079.html After repeated messages from this site that you can't find my uploaded files, I include this linkwhich expresses those views (related to NRC 8/5/2015 meeting in San Luis Obispo) which Iendorsehttp ://mothersforpeace.
org/blog/topics-to-address-at-august-5-20 15-nrc-meeting-in-slo file:llC :/Users/CAG/D ownloads/N R C-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html22 2/2 9/1/2015 9/1/2015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079.htmJ PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PM Received:
org/blog/topics-to-address-at-august-5-20 15-nrc-meeting-in-slo file:llC  
August 31, 2015 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-som4 Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License r'{Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Statement
:/Users/CAG/D ownloads/N R C-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html22 2/2 9/1/2015 9/1/2015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079.htmJ PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PMReceived:
-/ -ipact 77/ 7~9~-S Document:
August 31, 2015Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-som4 Comments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant Licenser'{Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare anStatement
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079 Comment on'FR Doc # 20 15-15921~e97~ ~~7t Submitter Information 9o Name: LMH Anonymous  
-/ -ipact77/ 7~9~-SDocument:
... , : " r,+,C ;':2;N, Co General Comment)z In addition to attached files, the NRC ought to consider the NO RENEWAL alternative completely; so that the public will get a full understanding of what will be required to decommission Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. What will need to be done and how long will it take and what are the environmental implications?
NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079 Comment on'FR Doc # 20 15-15921~e97~ ~~7tSubmitter Information 9oName: LMH Anonymous  
Knowing that might make it clearer that it's advisable not to renew the license, but to start the closing/clean-up processes sooner rather than later.There should also be a much fuller exploration in the BIS of what other analyses, policies and options are available to the public to secure our energy future. There are abundant resources for cutting edge thinking and doing. As an example, there's the Rocky Mountain Institute-RMI.org focus on electricity generally and also their report on energy opportunities without San Onofre NPP http://www.rmi.
... , : "r,+,C ;':2;N,CoGeneral Comment)zIn addition to attached files, the NRC ought to consider the NO RENEWAL alternative completely; so that the public will get a full understanding of what will be required todecommission Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. What will need to be done and how long will it take and whatare the environmental implications?
org/rmi report re inventing fire in southern_california and how smaller can be better http://blog.rmi.
Knowing that might make it clearer that it's advisable not to renew the license, but to start theclosing/clean-up processes sooner rather than later.There should also be a much fuller exploration in the BIS of what other analyses, policies andoptionsare available to the public to secure our energy future. There are abundant resources forcutting edge thinking and doing. As an example, there's the Rocky Mountain Institute-RMI.orgfocus on electricity generally and also their report on energy opportunities without San Onofre NPPhttp://www.rmi.
org/blog_20 14_10_20 micropowers~quiet__takeover Other factors to consider are included in the attached .pdf See attached file(s)file:lllC  
org/rmi report re inventing fire in southern_california and how smaller can be betterhttp://blog.rmi.
:IU sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html I/1/2 9/1/12015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0079.html After repeated messages from this site that you can't find my uploaded files, I include this link which expresses those views (related to NRC 8/5/2015 meeting in San Luis Obispo) which I endorse http ://mothersforpeace.
org/blog_20 14_10_20 micropowers~quiet__takeover Other factors to consider are included in the attached  
org/blog/topics-to-address-at-august-5-20 15-nrc-meeting-in-slo file:llC :/Users/CAG/D ownloads/N R C-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html22 2/2}}
.pdf See attached file(s)file:lllC  
:IU sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html I/1/2 9/1/12015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0079.html After repeated messages from this site that you can't find my uploaded files, I include this linkwhich expresses those views (related to NRC 8/5/2015 meeting in San Luis Obispo) which Iendorsehttp ://mothersforpeace.
org/blog/topics-to-address-at-august-5-20 15-nrc-meeting-in-slo file:llC  
:/Users/CAG/D ownloads/N R C-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html22 2/2}}

Latest revision as of 22:24, 8 July 2018

Comment (85) of Lmh Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML15289A314
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/2015
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
80FR37664 00085, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15289A314 (2)
v • d • e


Text

9/1/2015 9/1/2015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079.htmJ PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PM Received:

August 31, 2015 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-som4 Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License r'{Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Statement

-/ -ipact 77/ 7~9~-S Document:

NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079 Comment on'FR Doc # 20 15-15921~e97~ ~~7t Submitter Information 9o Name: LMH Anonymous

... , : " r,+,C ;':2;N, Co General Comment)z In addition to attached files, the NRC ought to consider the NO RENEWAL alternative completely; so that the public will get a full understanding of what will be required to decommission Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. What will need to be done and how long will it take and what are the environmental implications?

Knowing that might make it clearer that it's advisable not to renew the license, but to start the closing/clean-up processes sooner rather than later.There should also be a much fuller exploration in the BIS of what other analyses, policies and options are available to the public to secure our energy future. There are abundant resources for cutting edge thinking and doing. As an example, there's the Rocky Mountain Institute-RMI.org focus on electricity generally and also their report on energy opportunities without San Onofre NPP http://www.rmi.

org/rmi report re inventing fire in southern_california and how smaller can be better http://blog.rmi.

org/blog_20 14_10_20 micropowers~quiet__takeover Other factors to consider are included in the attached .pdf See attached file(s)file:lllC

IU sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html I/1/2 9/1/12015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0079.html After repeated messages from this site that you can't find my uploaded files, I include this link which expresses those views (related to NRC 8/5/2015 meeting in San Luis Obispo) which I endorse http ://mothersforpeace.

org/blog/topics-to-address-at-august-5-20 15-nrc-meeting-in-slo file:llC :/Users/CAG/D ownloads/N R C-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html22 2/2 9/1/2015 9/1/2015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079.htmJ PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 9/1/15 5:08 PM Received:

August 31, 2015 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljz-8kv5-som4 Comments Due: August 31, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2009-0552 Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License r'{Comment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026 Diablo Canyon Power Plant, units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Statement

-/ -ipact 77/ 7~9~-S Document:

NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0079 Comment on'FR Doc # 20 15-15921~e97~ ~~7t Submitter Information 9o Name: LMH Anonymous

... , : " r,+,C ;':2;N, Co General Comment)z In addition to attached files, the NRC ought to consider the NO RENEWAL alternative completely; so that the public will get a full understanding of what will be required to decommission Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. What will need to be done and how long will it take and what are the environmental implications?

Knowing that might make it clearer that it's advisable not to renew the license, but to start the closing/clean-up processes sooner rather than later.There should also be a much fuller exploration in the BIS of what other analyses, policies and options are available to the public to secure our energy future. There are abundant resources for cutting edge thinking and doing. As an example, there's the Rocky Mountain Institute-RMI.org focus on electricity generally and also their report on energy opportunities without San Onofre NPP http://www.rmi.

org/rmi report re inventing fire in southern_california and how smaller can be better http://blog.rmi.

org/blog_20 14_10_20 micropowers~quiet__takeover Other factors to consider are included in the attached .pdf See attached file(s)file:lllC

IU sers/C AG/D ownl oads/N RC- 2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html I/1/2 9/1/12015 N RC-2009-0552-D RAFT-0079.html After repeated messages from this site that you can't find my uploaded files, I include this link which expresses those views (related to NRC 8/5/2015 meeting in San Luis Obispo) which I endorse http ://mothersforpeace.

org/blog/topics-to-address-at-august-5-20 15-nrc-meeting-in-slo file:llC :/Users/CAG/D ownloads/N R C-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0079.html22 2/2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15289A314&oldid=855557"