ML16341C638: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2Facility:Date of Examination ItemTask Description lnitialsab-c#1.RITTENa.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N5(Rb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance wthSection D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.5lR,eBcAssess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics!5t,.Sd. Assess whether the justfcatons for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:Date of Examination Item Task Description lnitials a b-c#1.R I T T E N a.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N 5(Rb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance wth Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.5l R,eB cAssess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics!5t,.S d. Assess whether the justfcatons for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.-t/1-f ApB 2.s I M U L A T o RUsing Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
-t/1-fApB2.sIMULAToRUsing Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and majortransients.
4Y F4 b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedulewithout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using atleast one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenaros are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days'1/4d'kc.To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and conform(s) with the qualitative and described in Appendix D" bl A,f,'3 3.A L K T H R o U G H aVerify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (t  tne outlne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed , among the safety functions as specified on the form y'(Z tast< repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limts specified on the form./, &#xd8; no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) .,/{&#xf8;l the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form./,/<sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria ony'the form.i(a b. /erify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form{lD the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form/(Z) at least one task is new or significantly modified z i { i 4Zl no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing ES-301 -1 : examinations  
4YF4bAssess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number andmix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedulewithout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using atleast one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenaros are duplicated from theapplicants' audit test(s),
  &#xbf; '4/7{.8 c. Determne if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ofapplicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.4l ,(E 4.G E N E R A L a, Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days'1/4d'kc.To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 andconform(s) with the qualitative anddescribed in Appendix D"blA,f,'33.ALKTHRoUGHaVerify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
i6 RG b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
(t  tne outlne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed
iW?,(?c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for pl ant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.,'(R$\d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.4>&#xf3;Rre. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
, among the safety functions as specified on the form y'(Z tast< repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limts specified on the form./, &#xd8; no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) .,/{&#xf8;l the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form./,/<sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria ony'the form.i(ab. /erify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form{lD the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form/(Z) at least one task is new or significantly modified z i { i4Zl no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing ES-301 -1 :examinations  
't/;f'Rrg f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).-1/>?rs)Printed Date&#xbf;{ -''tb q;&#xf8;-f&#xbf;'ttlt&#xbf;sl&#xbf;l-fu-&#xbf;'
  &#xbf; '4/7{.8c. Determne if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ofapplicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.4l,(E4.GENERALa, Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in theappropriate exam sections.
: a. Author b. Facility Reviewer  
i6RGb. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
iW?,(?c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.,'(R$\d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
4>&#xf3;Rre. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
't/;f'Rrgf. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).-1/>?rs)PrintedDate&#xbf;{ -''tbq;&#xf8;-f&#xbf;'ttlt&#xbf;sl&#xbf;l-fu-&#xbf;'
: a. Authorb. Facility Reviewer  
(*)c. NRC Chief Examiner  
(*)c. NRC Chief Examiner  
(#)d. NRC Supervisor l&#xf3;# lndependent NRC reviewer initial* Not applicable for NRC-prepared items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence requiredexamination outlines.
(#)d. NRC Supervisor l&#xf3;# lndependent NRC reviewer initial* Not applicable for NRC-prepared items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required examination outlines.Note: C) roiN- yq$.*o  P)r<tr.re
Note:C) roiN- yq$.*o  P)r<tr.re
*)-iA r4$.&- * *(a'^b,.la, ES-201, Page 26 of 28-a4P,r^ url.t nd-^ c-J-d ,rf"-^ *J,-c;5.$p.&#xe7;}}
*)-iA r4$.&-  
* *(a'^b,.la,ES-201, Page 26 of 28-a4P,r^ url.tnd-^ c-J-d,rf"-^ *J,-c;5.$p.&#xe7;}}

Revision as of 03:49, 8 July 2018

DC Cook 2016 ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist
ML16341C638
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A374 List:
References
ES-201-2
Download: ML16341C638 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:Date of Examination Item Task Description lnitials a b-c#1.R I T T E N a.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N 5(Rb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance wth Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.5l R,eB cAssess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics!5t,.S d. Assess whether the justfcatons for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.-t/1-f ApB 2.s I M U L A T o RUsing Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

4Y F4 b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedulewithout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using atleast one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenaros are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days'1/4d'kc.To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and conform(s) with the qualitative and described in Appendix D" bl A,f,'3 3.A L K T H R o U G H aVerify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (t tne outlne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed , among the safety functions as specified on the form y'(Z tast< repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limts specified on the form./, Ø no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) .,/{øl the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form./,/<sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria ony'the form.i(a b. /erify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form{lD the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form/(Z) at least one task is new or significantly modified z i { i 4Zl no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing ES-301 -1 : examinations

¿ '4/7{.8 c. Determne if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ofapplicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.4l ,(E 4.G E N E R A L a, Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

i6 RG b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

iW?,(?c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for pl ant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.,'(R$\d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.4>óRre. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

't/;f'Rrg f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).-1/>?rs)Printed Date¿{ -tb q;ø-f¿'ttlt¿sl¿l-fu-¿'

a. Author b. Facility Reviewer

(*)c. NRC Chief Examiner

(#)d. NRC Supervisor ló# lndependent NRC reviewer initial* Not applicable for NRC-prepared items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required examination outlines.Note: C) roiN- yq$.*o P)r<tr.re

  • )-iA r4$.&- * *(a'^b,.la, ES-201, Page 26 of 28-a4P,r^ url.t nd-^ c-J-d ,rf"-^ *J,-c;5.$p.ç
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16341C638&oldid=842109"