ML15188A190: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS October 2, 2008 L -72,070 ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION PREPARED FOR: SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 55 EAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PREPARED BY: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 (630) 653-3920 Section I. TEXT 1.0 2.0 Introduction Field Work TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ....................................................... 2 2 3.0 Geophysical Testing ....................................*.......... 4 4.0 5.0 Laboratory Testing Closure 4 5 II. APPENDIX REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION  
{{#Wiki_filter:REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS October 2, 2008 L -72,070 ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION PREPARED FOR: SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 55 EAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PREPARED BY: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 (630) 653-3920 Section I. TEXT 1.0 2.0 Introduction Field Work TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ............
..........
..........
....................... 2 2 3.0 Geophysica l Testing ................................
....*.......... 4 4.0 5.0 Laboratory Testing Closure 4 5 II. APPENDIX REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION  


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
October 2, 2008 L-72,070 Presented in this report are the results of the soils investigation performed to determine the general subsurface conditions for the proposed construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage facility. The proposed structure will be constructed at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Zion, IL. This work was performed in general accordance with Technical Specification Subsurface Investigation Specification Z-5701 prepared by Sargent and Lundy and dated July 29, 2008. 2.0 FIELD WORK A total of two(2) soil borings (1-20 and 1-21) were performed for this project with each of them being extended to a depth of 100.0 feet. Boring 1-20 was subsequently converted into a seismic cross hole survey source hole. Additionally, two (2) boreholes were drilled and completed with 3" PVC casing for cross hole seismic testing. Upon completion of the drilling and testing, ground surface elevations as well as Northing and Easting coordinates were determined for the drilling locations using a Trimble R8 GPS. The vertical and horizontal data shown on the Boring Location Plan was retrieved from a National Geodetic Survey data base located approximately 1.2 miles south of Zion, Illinois.
 
Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 The boreholes were initially advanced by 4 1/4" hollow stem auger methods to the ground water table and then completed by rotary wash methods using bentonite and potable water in accordance with ASTM D 5783. Upon completion, each borehole was sealed with cement-bentonite grout placed by tremie methods. Soil samples were collected at 1-20 on 2.5 foot intervals for the entire 100 foot depth. At location 1-20 the sampling interval was 2.5 feet for the first 10 feet and 5.0 feet thereafter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) -N Values (ASTM D 1586), were determined using an automatic hammer which allows a 140 pound weight to free fall from a 30 inch drop to drive the sampler. The samples were collected using standard split spoon procedures during SPT since granular soils and/or very stiff clays prevented the use of Shelby tube samplers. Liners were not used with the split spoon samplers. Dynamic energy measurements have not been made on this automatic hammer. However, Pile Driving Analyzer's (PDA) have been used to process dynamic measurements of strain and acceleration between the drill string and similar hammers made by the same manufacturer (Boart Longyear). The Average Energy Transfer Ratio is accepted as 75% for this model hammer. The soil types were logged in the field by the drill crew and representative portions of each sample were contained in glass jars per ASTM D 4220 and brought back to our laboratory. Boring Logs defining the soil lithology and ground water observations is included in the Appendix of this report. Ground water depth was determined during hollow stem auger drilling only. The borings were completed using wet rotary methods and therefore, the water levels inside the boreholes at the completion of the drilling were not representative. PVC casing was installed shortly after the completion of the drilling and reaming at location 1-20. Boring 1-21 was sealed with grout immediately following the drilling and sampling to prevent an open hole hazard. Therefore, 24 hour water level readings were not obtained. The ground water depth measured during the hollow stem auger drilling is considered the most accurate indication of the undisturbed ground water levels at the site.
October 2, 2008 L-72,070 Presented in this report are the results of the soils investigation performed to determine the general subsurface conditions for the proposed construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage facility.
Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 3.0 GEOPHYSICAL TESTING Geophysical testing consisting of a Cross Hole Seismic Investigation, was performed at location 1-20. The original bore hole (1-20) was reamed to a depth of 100 feet using a 6" tri cone roller bit and then cased with 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-bentonite grout. Two additional holes (1-20A and 1-20B) were drilled using a 6" tri cone roller bit to a depth of 100 feet and were located in a straight line at approximate distances of 10 and 20 feet from 1-20. These bore holes were also completed with the installation of 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-bentonite grout. The Cross Hole testing was performed by Geotechnology, Inc. In general conformance with Section 4.31 of ASTM 04428. A copy of the report prepared by Geotechnology, Inc. summarizing the test results is included in the Appendix of this report. Following the testing each of the PVC casings were sealed with bentonite chips which were hydrated upon placement. In addition the PVC was cut off near the ground surface and topsoil was place over the holes. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obtained from the borings were examined in our laboratory and visually classified according to the Unified Soils Classification System (ASTM 0 2488). Cohesive soils were measured for moisture content (ASTM 0 2216) and unconfined compressive strength (ASTM 0 2166). Additional testing including grain size distribution (ASTM 0422, 0 1140), Alterberg Limits (ASTM 04318), pH (ASTM G 51) and dry unit weight determinations (EM 1110-2-1906) were performed on samples selected by Sargent and Lundy. The results of this testing has been summarized and incorporated into the Soil Test data Sheets included in the Appendix. Two (2) soil samples selected by the client were analyzed for soluble chlorides (Method 4500CL,C) and soluble sulfates (Method 4500S04, E) by First Environmental Laboratories. A copy of their report is Appended.
The proposed structure will be constructed at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Zion, IL. This work was performed in general accordance with Technical Specification Subsurface Investigation Specification Z-5701 prepared by Sargent and Lundy and dated July 29, 2008. 2.0 FIELD WORK A total of two(2) soil borings (1-20 and 1-21) were performed for this project with each of them being extended to a depth of 100.0 feet. Boring 1-20 was subsequently converted into a seismic cross hole survey source hole. Additionally, two (2) boreholes were drilled and completed with 3" PVC casing for cross hole seismic testing.
Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 5.0 CLOSURE The data and results presented in this report are based upon the conditions encountered at the two (2) locations investigated as indicated on the Soil Boring Location Plan. This report does not reflect any variations that may occur between these locations, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until the construction phase of the project. We are appreciative of the opportunity to assist you with this project and look forward to working with you in the future. Please call if you have any questions or are in need of further information. Respectfully Submitted, Machalinski Vice !'5resident Registered Professional Engineer Illinois No. 062-038559 Prepared By,. Darin Delaney Project Geologist APPENDIX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION CHART LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS TWO (2) BORING LOGS (6 pages) BORING LOCATION PLAN (1 page) GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT Geotechnology, Inc. (16 pages) SOIL DATA SHEETS (12 pages) TWO (2) ANALYTICAL REPORTS First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (5 pages)
Upon completion of the drilling and testing, ground surface elevations as well as Northing and Easting coordinates were determined for the drilling locations using a Trimble R8 GPS. The vertical and horizontal data shown on the Boring Location Plan was retrieved from a National Geodetic Survey data base located approximately 1.2 miles south of Zion, Illinois.
Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 The boreholes were initially advanced by 4 1/4" hollow stem auger methods to the ground water table and then completed by rotary wash methods using bentonite and potable water in accordance with ASTM D 5783. Upon completion, each borehole was sealed with cement-bentonite grout placed by tremie methods.
Soil samples were collected at 1-20 on 2.5 foot intervals for the entire 100 foot depth. At location 1-20 the sampling interval was 2.5 feet for the first 10 feet and 5.0 feet thereafter.
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) -N Values (ASTM D 1586), were determined using an automatic hammer which allows a 140 pound weight to free fall from a 30 inch drop to drive the sampler.
The samples were collected using standard split spoon procedures during SPT since granular soils and/or very stiff clays prevented the use of Shelby tube samplers.
Liners were not used with the split spoon samplers.
Dynamic energy measurements have not been made on this automatic hammer. However, Pile Driving Analyzer's (PDA) have been used to process dynamic measurements of strain and acceleration between the drill string and similar hammers made by the same manufacturer (Boart Longyear).
The Average Energy Transfer Ratio is accepted as 75% for this model hammer. The soil types were logged in the field by the drill crew and representative portions of each sample were contained in glass jars per ASTM D 4220 and brought back to our laboratory.
Boring Logs defining the soil lithology and ground water observations is included in the Appendix of this report. Ground water depth was determined during hollow stem auger drilling only. The borings were completed using wet rotary methods and therefore, the water levels inside the boreholes at the completion of the drilling were not representative.
PVC casing was installed shortly after the completion of the drilling and reaming at location 1-20. Boring 1-21 was sealed with grout immediately following the drilling and sampling to prevent an open hole hazard. Therefore, 24 hour water level readings were not obtained.
The ground water depth measured during the hollow stem auger drilling is considered the most accurate indication of the undisturbed ground water levels at the site.
Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 3.0 GEOPHYSICAL TESTING Geophysical testing consisting of a Cross Hole Seismic Investigation, was performed at location 1-20. The original bore hole (1-20) was reamed to a depth of 100 feet using a 6" tri cone roller bit and then cased with 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-benton ite grout. Two additional holes (1-20A and 1-20B) were drilled using a 6" tri cone roller bit to a depth of 100 feet and were located in a straight line at approximate distances of 10 and 20 feet from 1-20. These bore holes were also completed with the installation of 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-bentoni te grout. The Cross Hole testing was performed by Geotechno logy, Inc. In general conformance with Section 4.31 of ASTM 04428. A copy of the report prepared by Geotechno logy, Inc. summarizing the test results is included in the Appendix of this report. Following the testing each of the PVC casings were sealed with bentonite chips which were hydrated upon placement.
In addition the PVC was cut off near the ground surface and topsoil was place over the holes. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obtained from the borings were examined in our laboratory and visually classified according to the Unified Soils Classification System (ASTM 0 2488). Cohesive soils were measured for moisture content (ASTM 0 2216) and unconfined compressive strength (ASTM 0 2166). Additional testing including grain size distribution (ASTM 0422, 0 1140), Alterberg Limits (ASTM 04318), pH (ASTM G 51) and dry unit weight determinations (EM 1110-2-1906) were performed on samples selected by Sargent and Lundy. The results of this testing has been summarized and incorporated into the Soil Test data Sheets included in the Appendix.
Two (2) soil samples selected by the client were analyzed for soluble chlorides (Method 4500CL,C) and soluble sulfates (Method 4500S04, E) by First Environmental Laboratories.
A copy of their report is Appended.
Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 5.0 CLOSURE The data and results presented in this report are based upon the conditions encountered at the two (2) locations investigated as indicated on the Soil Boring Location Plan. This report does not reflect any variations that may occur between these locations, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until the construction phase of the project. We are appreciative of the opportunit y to assist you with this project and look forward to working with you in the future. Please call if you have any questions or are in need of further information. Respectfully Submitted, Machalinski Vice !'5resident Registered Professional Engineer Illinois No. 062-038559 Prepared By,. Darin Delaney Project Geologist APPENDIX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION CHART LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS TWO (2) BORING LOGS (6 pages) BORING LOCATION PLAN (1 page) GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT Geotechnology, Inc. (16 pages) SOIL DATA SHEETS (12 pages) TWO (2) ANALYTICAL REPORTS First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (5 pages)
H
H
* x TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION UNIFlEO CLASSIFICATION CHART 0 0 " " z " -CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNING GROUP SYMBOLS AND GROUP tlAMES USING LABORATORY TESTS 0 GRAVELS Mort Ihon CLEAN GRAVELS of CGo'U Lus Ihon 5&deg;10 ,.oclion relolned fines C Cu <4 ond/o. I> Cc > 3 e 00 No.4 siev.. GRAVELS WITH Fines (Iouify as ML 0' Mil SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP HW80L GW GP GM GROUP NAME b Poo.lyg'oded g.ovel f Silly g.ovt'l f,O,1I GC Cloyey q.ovel f ,q ,II FINES Mo.e Ilion Fines clossHy os CL or CH 0 f-____________ i ,,,, w 0 _0 * " , o o , SANDS 50 &deg;/0 0' more of eoo,st' Iroclion pOISU No.4 sieve CLEAN SANDS Lus Ilion 5 &deg;/0 ,jnes d SANDS WITII FINES Mo,e Ilion 120/0 flnt's" Cu'-:'60nd/o' I> Cc!>3e Fines clossj,y as ML o. Mil Fines clossi'y as CL 0< CH SW SP SM SC CL Wt'II-q'oded sond , Poo.ly q.oded liond 1 Silly sand 0,11,' Cloyt'y sand 0, II, I Leon cloy k ,I,m 0 SILTS e CLAYS Liquid limil leu Ilion 500/0 PI:> 7 ond plols on or above "A' line j Ino.qon;c f---------------------'-------------------------------------+----+--------------------_1 0 PI <: 4 a. plots bt'low .. A" line j z . , w ** z ** ;; O,oonic Liquid Ii mil oven dried Liquid limil -nol dried "'" 0.75 * ". o P I plats on a. obove "A' line , w 0 z , ;:;: :; SILTS {} CLAYS Liquid limil 50 0/0 a. mo.e PI plotli bela .. ''A'' line Orqonic liquid limil -oven droed <0 Liquid limil -nol dried . IHOhly a.oanic soits Primarily o.gonic motte',dork 'n color, and o''Jonic ado.
* x TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION UNIFlEO CLASSIFICATION CHART 0 0 " " z " -CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNING GROUP SYMBOLS AND GROUP tlAMES USING LABORATORY TESTS 0 GRAVELS Mort Ihon CLEAN GRAVELS of CGo'U Lus Ihon 5&deg;10 ,.oclion relolned fines C Cu <4 ond/o. I> Cc > 3 e 00 No.4 siev.. GRAVELS WITH Fines (Iouify as ML 0' Mil SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP HW80L GW GP GM GROUP NAME b Poo.lyg'oded g.ovel f Silly g.ovt'l f,O,1I GC Cloyey q.ovel f ,q ,II FINES Mo.e Ilion Fines clossHy os CL or CH 0 f-____________ i ,,,, w 0 _0 * " , o o , SANDS 50 &deg;/0 0' more of eoo,st' Iroclion pOISU No.4 sieve CLEAN SANDS Lus Ilion 5 &deg;/0 ,jnes d SANDS WITII FINES Mo,e Ilion 120/0 flnt's" Cu'-:'60nd/o' I> Cc!>3e Fines clossj,y as ML o. Mil Fines clossi'y as CL 0< CH SW SP SM SC CL Wt'II-q'oded sond , Poo.ly q.oded liond 1 Silly sand 0,11,' Cloyt'y sand 0, II, I Leon cloy k ,I,m 0 SILTS e CLAYS Liquid limil leu Ilion 500/0 PI:> 7 ond plols on or above "A' line j Ino.qon;c f-------------------
* o. BaHd onlhe molt.lol passing Ihe J-in 175-mm) Ileve. b.1I field cOnloil'led cobbles ond/o. boulders,odd " .. ith cobbles al'ld/o' boulder" 10 g.oup nome. c. Grovels wilh 510 12 ala fint'S require dual symbols GW-GM 1,,11 oroded grovel .. ith sill GW-GC .. ell oroded grovel .. ith cloy GP -GM poorly (traded growel .. illl s.1t GP-GC poorly qroded q.ovel .. illI cloy d. Sands .. illl 5010 10 12 &deg;/0 fil'les ** quire duol symbols SW-SM .. ell (traded sond .. ill, silt .. SW-SC .. til (traded SOlid .. illI clOl SP -SM poo.ly I)rod.d sOl'ld .. ilt, s;lI Sf>-SC poo"y g.oded sand .. illI cloy , C _ (030' " soil conlains 15 0/0 SOlld,Odd" .. itll sand" 10 I)roup nom *. g.1f finesclonilyos CL-ML,lIu dual symbol GC-GM,SC-SM. II. It fil'lu art' a''Jonie,odd'' .. itll o.gonic fines" 10 ?rOUP l'Iome. I II soil conloil'll? 15 &deg;/0 orovel,odd" .. ilh orov.I' 10 I)roup nome. 0 ML Sill .,I,m OL O'oonic cloy .,I,m,n Organic sill -, I ,m,o '" roO cloy k,I,m M" Eloslic sill k,l,m 0" O.qonic cloy*,I,m,P O''Jonic sill k,I,m,q PT Pt'ol I. If Alle.berg limits pial 11'1 hOlched area, soil is a CL-ML, ,illy cloy. k.1I soil conloins 1510 29 &deg;/0 plus No. 200,odd " .. "hsond" Or "",illl 9rovt'I" .... hichever 'S predominol'll. .... soil conloins?;,. 30&deg;10 plus No. 200,p.edomll'lonlly !ol'ld, odd "sandy" 10 (t.oup nome. m.1I soil &deg;/oP11l5 Na.200,p'edarninOl'llly Olavel, odd ''orovrIlY'' 10 oroup nome. and plols 01'101 obovt"h" IIl'Ie. o. 4 0. plols btto .. ':{Io':, line. :: IIl'Ie. V / V // / 0 V :? / / v' 0 / // / -. V / 0 V V * // / 'v MH OR 0 0 V / / // / 0 r --;;; / V ML 0 OL L-ML)!:; '///,Y oV 0 , o '0 JO .0 '0 .0 10 80 90 '00 L10UID LIMIT ( LLl FILL TOPSOIL SAMPLE TYPE: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS -.... ---..... PEAT GRAVEL SS Split Spoon ST Thin:Walied Tube A = Auger SAND SILT CLAY FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST DATA: N = Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot Wc Qu In-Situ Water Content Unconfined Compressive Strength in Tons per Square Foot DOLOMITE
--'-----------------------
--------------+----+
--------------------
_1 0 PI <: 4 a. plots bt'low .. A" line j z . , w ** z ** ;;
O,oonic Liquid Ii mil oven dried Liquid limil -nol dried "'" 0.75 * ". o P I plats on a. obove "A' line , w 0 z , ;:;: :; SILTS {} CLAYS Liquid limil 50 0/0 a. mo.e PI plotli bela .. ''A'' line Orqonic liquid limil -oven droed <0 Liquid limil -nol dried . IHOhly a.oanic soits Primarily o.gonic motte',dork 'n color, and o''Jonic ado.
* o. BaHd onlhe molt.lol passing Ihe J-in 175-mm) Ileve. b.1I field cOnloil'led cobbles ond/o. boulders,odd " .. ith cobbles al'ld/o' boulder" 10 g.oup nome. c. Grovels wilh 510 12 ala fint'S require dual symbols GW-GM 1,,11 oroded grovel .. ith sill GW-GC .. ell oroded grovel .. ith cloy GP -GM poorly (traded growel .. illl s.1t GP-GC poorly qroded q.ovel .. illI cloy d. Sands .. illl 5010 10 12 &deg;/0 fil'les ** quire duol symbols SW-SM .. ell (traded sond .. ill, silt .. SW-SC .. til (traded SOlid .. illI clOl SP -SM poo.ly I)rod.d sOl'ld .. ilt, s;lI Sf>-SC poo"y g.oded sand .. illI cloy , C _ (030' " soil conlains 15 0/0 SOlld,Odd" .. itll sand" 10 I)roup nom *. g.1f finesclonilyos CL-ML,lIu dual symbol GC-GM,SC-SM.
II. It fil'lu art' a''Jonie,odd'' .. itll o.gonic fines" 10 ?rOUP l'Iome. I II soil conloil'l l? 15 &deg;/0 orovel,odd" .. ilh orov.I' 10 I)roup nome. 0 ML Sill .,I,m OL O'oonic cloy .,I,m,n Organic sill -, I ,m,o '" roO cloy k,I,m M" Eloslic sill k,l,m 0" O.qonic cloy*,I,m,P O''Jonic sill k,I,m,q PT Pt'ol I. If Alle.berg limits pial 11'1 hOlched area, soil is a CL-ML, ,illy cloy. k.1I soil conloins 1510 29 &deg;/0 plus No. 200,odd " .. "hsond" Or "",illl 9rovt'I" .... hichever 'S predominol'll. .... soil conloins?;,. 30&deg;10 plus No. 200,p.edomll'lonlly  
!ol'ld, odd "sandy" 10 (t.oup nome. m.1I soil  
&deg;/oP11l5 Na.200,p'eda rninOl'llly Olavel, odd ''orovrIlY'' 10 oroup nome.
and plols 01'101 obovt"h" IIl'Ie. o. 4 0. plols btto .. ':{Io':, line. :: IIl'Ie. V / V // / 0 V :? / / v' 0 / // / -. V / 0 V V * // / 'v MH OR 0 0 V / / // / 0 r --;;; / V ML 0 OL L-ML)!:; '///,Y oV 0 , o '0 JO .0 '0 .0 10 80 90 '00 L10UID LIMIT ( LLl FILL TOPSOIL SAMPLE TYPE: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS -.... ---..... PEAT GRAVEL SS Split Spoon ST Thin:Walied Tube A = Auger SAND SILT CLAY FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST DATA: N = Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot Wc Qu In-Situ Water Content Unconfined Compressive Strength in Tons per Square Foot DOLOMITE
* Pocket Penetrometer Measurement; Maximum Reading = 4.5 tsf yD Dry Unit Weight in Pounds per Cubic Foot WATER LEVELS: SOIL DESCRIPTION: V \l ... While Drilling End of Boring 24 Hours MATERIAL BOULDER COBBLE Coarse GRAVEL Small GRAVEL Coarse SAND Medium SAND Fine SAND SILT and CLAY COHESIVE SOILS CONSISTENCY Qu Very Soft Soft Stiff Tough Very Tough Hard Less than 0.3 0.3 to 0.6 0.6 to 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 2.0 to 4.0 4.0 and over MODIFYING TERM Trace linle Some PARTICLE SIZE RANGE Over 12 inches 12 inches to 3 inches 3 inches to '/. inch '/. inch to No.4 Sieve No.4 Sieve to No.1 0 Sieve No. 10 Sieve to No. 40 Sieve No. 40 Sieve to No. 200 Sieve Passing No. 200 Sieve COHESIONLESS SOILS RELATIVE DENSITY Very Loose Loose Firm Dense Very Dense PERCENT BY WEIGHT 1 -10 10 -20 20 -35 _N_ 0-4 4 -10 10 -30 30 -50 50 and over   
* Pocket Penetrometer Measurement; Maximum Reading = 4.5 tsf yD Dry Unit Weight in Pounds per Cubic Foot WATER LEVELS: SOIL DESCRIPTION: V \l ... While Drilling End of Boring 24 Hours MATERIAL BOULDER COBBLE Coarse GRAVEL Small GRAVEL Coarse SAND Medium SAND Fine SAND SILT and CLAY COHESIVE SOILS CONSISTENCY Qu Very Soft Soft Stiff Tough Very Tough Hard Less than 0.3 0.3 to 0.6 0.6 to 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 2.0 to 4.0 4.0 and over MODIFYING TERM Trace linle Some PARTICLE SIZE RANGE Over 12 inches 12 inches to 3 inches 3 inches to '/. inch '/. inch to No.4 Sieve No.4 Sieve to No.1 0 Sieve No. 10 Sieve to No. 40 Sieve No. 40 Sieve to No. 200 Sieve Passing No. 200 Sieve COHESIONLESS SOILS RELATIVE DENSITY Very Loose Loose Firm Dense Very Dense PERCENT BY WEIGHT 1 -10 10 -20 20 -35 _N_ 0-4 4 -10 10 -30 30 -50 50 and over   
.... "' "' "' z H "' "' is Ul :;: 0 ,.., "' III "' U .... Ul H Cl Q " o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-20 '-="'-----DATE ST ARTED _-,8,-.. ELEVATIONS ___ _ END OF BORING ___ _ ,.: (90 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC au DEPTH ELEV. NO. TYPE -> -' , 1 SS 5* 11*13 3.0 584.2 .. Ixi -> < 2 SS 2* 2*4 5.5 581.7 -... X* -3 SS 2* , 1-1 -' .. X* -. 4 SS 1* 2*3 10.5 576.7 -...... xl -' .. 5 SS 8* , . 10-12 -' ... . . -... 6 SS 7* -: .... 8-10 ;....;....; 15.5 571.7 -,",', Ixl -' .... 7 SS 9* 23*22 -' -" *x. 8 SS 10* -' 17-19 -' .. xl 9 SS 13* -. 14*21 23.0 564.2 -xl 10 SS 14* -' 30*29 25.5 561.7 -tl -11 SS 8-26.6 5*5 28.0 559.2 -12 SS 8-11.0 4.5+' 129.9 -10*11 --13 SS 8* 11.2 6.73 128.4 9*13 --xl 14 SS 7* 20.5 4.73 108.5 -7*10 -xl -15 SS 10* 12.8 6.90 125.2 14-15 38.0 549.2 -IX. 16 SS 31* 14.8 120.4 5015" .. DRILL RIG NO. 315 DIVISion lines beh.ccn depoSits represent dppro-:irnale boundClli(!s Ilel::een sOlllWes IIl-S!Il1. the transition may ba grmJlI<l1 DATE COMPLETED _-'8 ..... 1.:..4.:.. .. "'0.:..8_ JOB L .. 72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M"'u::.d::..:..R:::o..::ta:..:r,Ly-'W"'a:::s:..:h-'-__ ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Firm brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) v Loose brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) \ S-2: % Graval = 8 / % Sand = 86 oj" Silt and -6 Loose dark gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Firm gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) S-7: % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 91 % Silt and Clay = 4 Dense gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Dense gray fine SAND, trace silt, saturated (SP-SM) Firm gray sandy SILT, saturated (Ml) S-12: (ll, Pl, PI) 22,11,11 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 24 % Silt = 52 % Clay = 21 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, very moist (Ml) Page 1 of 3 f-< '" '" u. z H '" u. g; UJ :;: 0 '"' '" 00 '" f-< UJ H " &sect; o u i" PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Pow0'...r.'.P .. la .. n ... t __ _ CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING .'.1-.=2c::.0 __ _ DATE STARTED _--,8'...-.:.:12::.-",08:::....._ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE _-'5,,8 .. 7 ... 2=--___ _ END OF BORING _..::4,,8 .. 7 .. ,2=--___ _ ;..; "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. NO. TYPE 55 60 65 40.5 546.7 --I -17 SS 11-9.6 10.71 133.8 14-14 --I 18 SS 10-10.6 5.90 131.0 11 -xl -19 SS 11-10.5 9.38 131.3 13-13 --xl 20 SS 8-12.9 5.12 124.4 15 -xl -21 SS 9-13.8 5.06 122.7 10-13 --xl 22 SS 8-13.4 5.32 123.7 14 23 SS 12-13.4 6.23 123.7 17 -ZI 24 SS 12-15.7 5.12 118.3 15-15 -C>I -25 SS 10-20.3 4.07 108.8 11-13 -xl -26 SS 8-20.1 3.93 106.9 11 -;;; 127 -;;; SS 8-13.8 4.53 117.7 8-8 40 45 50 68.0 519.2 -;;; 128 SS 10* 17.4 3.01 114.6 -;;; 50/6" -;;; -/ 29 SS --70 72.5 514.7 -;;; -;;; X 30 SS 25-7.6 14.57 113.8 --34-42 -;;; 131 -;;; SS 21-11. 1 4.5* ..
.... "' "' "' z H "' "' is Ul :;: 0 ,.., "' III "' U .... Ul H Cl Q " o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-20 '-="'-----DATE ST ARTED _-,8,-.. ELEVATIONS ___ _ END OF BORING ___ _ ,.: (90 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC au DEPTH ELEV. NO. TYPE -> -' , 1 SS 5* 11*13 3.0 584.2 .. Ixi -> < 2 SS 2* 2*4 5.5 581.7 -... X* -3 SS 2* , 1-1 -' .. X* -. 4 SS 1* 2*3 10.5 576.7 -...... xl -' .. 5 SS 8* , . 10-12 -' ... . . -... 6 SS 7* -: .... 8-10 ;....;....;
* 129.6 / 31-36 75 78.0 509.2 -IX 132 SS 37* 10.7 130.7 50/5" -80 RIG NO. 315 DIVISion hnes bct'.-.een del}QSlls represent appfO"unatc buumt[lries beh'.een soillypes in*Sllu tile transition may be gradual DATE COMPLETED _-,8'..-1.'.4.'.-.::08,,-_ JOB L-72,07D WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M .. __ " 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-22: (ll, Pl, PI) = 31,12,19 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 15 % Silt = 50 % Clay = 34 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional Cobbles, moist (Cl) Boulder Zone 69.5 to 72.5' Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, lillie sancl, moist (Cl-Ml) Page 2 of 3 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lund
15.5 571.7 -,",', Ixl -' .... 7 SS 9* 23*22 -' -" *x. 8 SS 10* -' 17-19 -' .. xl 9 SS 13* -. 14*21 23.0 564.2 -xl 10 SS 14* -' 30*29 25.5 561.7 -tl -11 SS 8-26.6 5*5 28.0 559.2 -12 SS 8-11.0 4.5+' 129.9 -10*11 --13 SS 8* 11.2 6.73 128.4 9*13 --xl 14 SS 7* 20.5 4.73 108.5 -7*10 -xl -15 SS 10* 12.8 6.90 125.2 14-15 38.0 549.2 -IX. 16 SS 31* 14.8 120.4 5015" .. DRILL RIG NO. 315 DIVISion lines beh.ccn depoSits represent dppro-:irna le boundClli
* LLC BORING ;..1-.=2,-=0 __ _ DATE STARTED ___ 8'---1.:.:2:...-0:::8'----_ DATE COMPLETED _-,8,---1;..4;..-",0",8_ JOB L-72,070 ELEVATIONS WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5::8:.:.7.:.:.2=--___ _ V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' END OF BORING 487.2 'V AT END OF BORING __ ----'M",u:::d"-'.:R::o:.:.ta::.:r.!.y __ W=as ... ___ >< '" to 0 SAMPLE ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) N WC Qu Y DRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Z U f-.'-'''':''=--j NO. TYPE __ -"Xl 33 % Gravel = &deg; _ SS 43-12.0 127.3 % Sand = 27 50/4" % Silt and Clay = 73 --Xl 34 SS 44-85-50/4" /'11 SS 9-8-9 --XI36 90-SS 7-8-11 = Xl SS 8-12-13 --IXI 38 95-'" SS 8-12-13 -*:<1'11 SS 26-27-15 -12.1 13.2 15.1 2.55 18.0 3.21 16.0 2.48 16.2 4.0' 17.3 3.0' 12.1 13.9 2.0 86.0 501.2 87.0 500.2 119.7 gray clayey SILT, little sand, moist Firm gray clayey SAND, saturated (SC) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) Dense gray fine to medium SAND, saturated (SP) Very tough gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) _---l'l..l.JL4'IX--'1 40 SS 11.9 2.0' 5 100 w In W [-0 (J) '4 ---Cl 105-" " ----110----115----End of Boring at 100.0'
(!s Ilel::een sOlllWes IIl-S!Il1.
* Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer. Diedrich D-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer R ,_ DIVISion hnes between deposits represent DRILL RIG NO. 315 <'lpprOXnllale boundaries bel\'.'een salt types in-sllu, the transition be gradual Page 3 of 3 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power ________________ _ E-< '" '" "-Z H '" "-!3 Ul " 3 '" "' '" Ul H '" i;l , " CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-21 .:...::'-'----DATE START E D _-'8'--".::18::.":0&deg;8"---_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SUR FACE _--'5,,8,,7.:.:.1'---___ _ END OF BORING _-=4,,8,,7.:.:,1'---___ _ E-< '-'0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. NO, TYPE h IX 1 SS 6--... 8-9 3.0 584.1 o -,> IX 2 SS 4-f-' 7-10 5.5 581.6 5 -,'.'. xl -:< 3 SS 4-5-9 , -, . -:'"-XII 4 SS 10-,-.". 13-15 10 ..... -" , -:' , .. , -.. ", . -' X_ SS 5 8-,-. >: 13-14 15 -' -. .. -. -: , -, 'IX. 6 SS 11--' 13-13 20 -;:' 22.0 565.1 -:,' X. -'. 7 SS 10--15-12 25 -. 27.0 560.1 ... -.. -"0' X 8 SS 6--8-11 30 --, 32.0 555.1 --xl 9 SS 16-12.7 5.41 122.7 21 --35 38.0 549.1 --i 10 SS 36-12.2 4.5+' 50/4" 40 ,. DIVISion lines bel' .. een depoSits represent appro)[unate boundaries beh&deg;.'een S!)III}PCS. in-sllll, the tranSItion may be gradual DRILL RIG NO. 315 DATE COMPLETED 8"18"08 ----'-'--'-''-------JOB L"72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' \l AT END OF BORING ___ --'-R"'oc:ta.:::r"'y_W'-'-=a-=-sh"---__ _ l' 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Firm brown and gray clayey SAND and GRAVEL, damp (SC-GC) Firm brown and gray SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) \S-2: % Gravel = 1 I % Sand = 95 % Silt and Clav 4 S-5: % Gravel = 24 % Sand = 72 % Silt and Clay = 4 Firm gray SAND, some gravel, occasional Cobbles, saturated (SP) Firm gray SAND, saturated (SP) Firm gray silty fine to medium SAND, saturated (SM) S-9: (LL, PL, PI) = 28, 14, 14 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 8 % Silt = 59 % Clay = 32 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, trace sand, trace gravel, moist (CL) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel. occasional silt searns, damp ICL-IVILl _ --' rage 1 of 3 Co OJ OJ '" z H OJ ;;! '" !3 (f) '" &deg; .., W '" W u ::i! Co (f) H 0 o " U 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 PRO,IECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING ,-1-=2-,-1 __ _ DATE STARTED _-,8,--1.:.:8,--",08,,--_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5.,.8.:.7'-',1 _____ _ END OF BORI NG _--=4:::8,,7.:.,1'--___ _ Co "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV, NO. TYPE -42,0 545.1 -V -xl 11 SS 16-13,0 4.0' 124.7 25 ---
the transition may ba grmJlI<l1 DATE COMPLETED _-'8 ..... 1.:..4.:.. .. "'0.:..8_ JOB L .. 72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M"'u::.d::..:..R:::o..::ta:..:r,Ly-'W"'a:::s:..:h-'-__ ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Firm brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) v Loose brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) \ S-2: % Graval = 8 / % Sand = 86 oj" Silt and -6 Loose dark gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Firm gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) S-7: % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 91 % Silt and Clay = 4 Dense gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Dense gray fine SAND, trace silt, saturated (SP-SM) Firm gray sandy SILT, saturated (Ml) S-12: (ll, Pl, PI) 22,11,11 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 24 % Silt = 52 % Clay = 21 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, very moist (Ml) Page 1 of 3 f-< '" '" u. z H '" u. g; UJ :;: 0 '"' '" 00 '" f-< UJ H " &sect; o u i" PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Pow0'...r.'.P .. la .. n ... t __ _ CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING .'.1-.=2c::.0 __ _ DATE STARTED _--,8'...-.:.:12::.-",08:::....._
-Xl 12 SS 15-9.7 9.22 133.5 34 -52,0 535.1 -13 SS 26-9,9 3.5' 50/3" --58,0 529,1 IX. 14 SS 17-29 5011" .. .. IX* 15 ss 27--:: 24-24 .-.......::: 68.0 519.1 --'" IX 16 SS 14-14,5 7,73 121.1 -; 17-20 -/: ---xl 17 SS 14-15.7 2,5' 118,3 23 --? -? -rt1lxl 18 5S 16-13,3 6.23 124.0 16*18 ......J..1LI __ , .. DRILL RIG NO, 315 01'/'510n hnes bel .. cen depoSits represent approxllna!C bOllildarics bel\".ecn sOlllypes. In-situ. tile tranSition be gradual DATE COMPLETED 8-18-08 ---'-'-'-'-JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' '\! AT END OF BORING ___ __ _ ... 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS very tougn to hard gray very silty GLAY, lillie sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, damp (CL-Ml) S-11 : (ll, Pl, PI) = 23, 12, 11 % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 20 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 24 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Dense to very dense gray SAND and GRAVEL, occasional Cobbles and Boulders, saturated (SP-GP) Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-17: (ll, Pl, PI) = 25,12,13 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 19 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 27 ----Page 2 of 3   
ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE _-'5,,8 .. 7 ... 2=--___ _ END OF BORING _..::4,,8  
,... '" '" u. z H '" i;! u. !3 Ul 3 0 .., '" "' '" U c' Ul H Cl " 00 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORI NG .:.1--=2:..:1'-----__ _ DATE STARTED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-.::0:.8_ ELEVATIONS ___ _ END OF BORING _--=4 .. ___ _ ,... 00 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. '" NO. .., TYPE 80 ---IX_ -19 SS 10-13.4 4.5+" 21 85 -87.0 500.1 --IX 20 SS 11-17.5 3.5' 26 90 ---95 -!X 21 SS 15-13.2 4.5+* 25 ---100 -10122 SS 20-10.3 4.5+" 29-37 ----105 -----110 --
.. 7 .. ,2=--___ _ ;..; "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. NO. TYPE 55 60 65 40.5 546.7 --I -17 SS 11-9.6 10.71 133.8 14-14 --I 18 SS 10-10.6 5.90 131.0 11 -xl -19 SS 11-10.5 9.38 131.3 13-13 --xl 20 SS 8-12.9 5.12 124.4 15 -xl -21 SS 9-13.8 5.06 122.7 10-13 --xl 22 SS 8-13.4 5.32 123.7 14 23 SS 12-13.4 6.23 123.7 17 -ZI 24 SS 12-15.7 5.12 118.3 15-15 -C>I -25 SS 10-20.3 4.07 108.8 11-13 -xl -26 SS 8-20.1 3.93 106.9 11 -;;; 127 -;;; SS 8-13.8 4.53 117.7 8-8 40 45 50 68.0 519.2 -;;; 128 SS 10* 17.4 3.01 114.6 -;;; 50/6" -;;; -/ 29 SS --70 72.5 514.7 -;;; -;;; X 30 SS 25-7.6 14.57 113.8 --34-42 -;;; 131 -;;; SS 21-11. 1 4.5* ..
* 129.6 / 31-36 75 78.0 509.2 -IX 132 SS 37* 10.7 130.7 50/5" -80 RIG NO. 315 DIVISion hnes bct'.-.een del}QSlls represent appfO"una tc buumt[lries beh'.een soillypes in*Sllu tile transition may be gradual DATE COMPLETED
_-,8'..-1.'.4
.'.-.::08,,-_ JOB L-72,07D WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M .. __ " 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-22: (ll, Pl, PI) = 31,12,19 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 15 % Silt = 50 % Clay = 34 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional Cobbles, moist (Cl) Boulder Zone 69.5 to 72.5' Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, lillie sancl, moist (Cl-Ml) Page 2 of 3 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lund
* LLC BORING ;..1-.=2,-=0 __ _ DATE STARTED ___ 8'---1.:.:2:...-0:::8'----_ DATE COMPLETED _-,8,---1;..4;..-",0",8_ JOB L-72,070 ELEVATIONS WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5::8:.:.7.:.:.2=--___ _ V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' END OF BORING 487.2 'V AT END OF BORING __ ----'M",u:::d"-'.:R::o:.:.ta::.:r.!.y __ W=as ... ___ >< '"
to 0 SAMPLE ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed)
N WC Qu Y DRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Z U f-.'-'''':''=
--j NO. TYPE
__ -"Xl 33 % Gravel = &deg; _ SS 43-12.0 127.3 % Sand = 27 50/4" % Silt and Clay = 73 --Xl 34 SS 44-85-50/4" /'11 SS 9-8-9 --XI36 90-SS 7-8-11 = Xl SS 8-12-13 --IXI 38 95-'" SS 8-12-13 -*:<1'11 SS 26-27-15 -12.1 13.2 15.1 2.55 18.0 3.21 16.0 2.48 16.2 4.0' 17.3 3.0' 12.1 13.9 2.0 86.0 501.2 87.0 500.2 119.7 gray clayey SILT, little sand, moist Firm gray clayey SAND, saturated (SC) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasiona l silt seams, moist (CL-ML) Dense gray fine to medium SAND, saturated (SP) Very tough gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) _---l'l..l.JL4'IX
--'1 40 SS 11.9 2.0' 5 100 w In W [-0 (J) '4 ---Cl 105-" " ----110----115----End of Boring at 100.0'
* Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer. Diedrich D-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer R ,_ DIVISion hnes between deposits represent DRILL RIG NO. 315 <'lpprOXnllale boundaries bel\'.'een salt types in-sllu, the transition be gradual Page 3 of 3 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power ________________
_ E-< '" '" "-Z H '" "-!3 Ul " 3 '" "' '" Ul H '" i;l , " CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-21 .:...::'-'----DATE START E D _-'8'--".::18::.":0&deg;8"---_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SUR FACE _--'5,,8,,7.:.:.1'---___ _ END OF BORING _-=4,,8,,7.:.:,1'---___ _ E-< '-'0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. NO, TYPE h IX 1 SS 6--... 8-9 3.0 584.1 o -,> IX 2 SS 4-f-' 7-10 5.5 581.6 5 -,'.'. xl -:< 3 SS 4-5-9 , -, . -:'"-XII 4 SS 10-,-.". 13-15 10 ..... -" , -:' , .. , -.. ", . -' X_ SS 5 8-,-. >: 13-14 15 -' -. .. -. -: , -, 'IX. 6 SS 11--' 13-13 20 -;:' 22.0 565.1 -:,' X. -'. 7 SS 10--15-12 25 -. 27.0 560.1 ... -.. -"0' X 8 SS 6--8-11 30 --, 32.0 555.1 --xl 9 SS 16-12.7 5.41 122.7 21 --35 38.0 549.1 --i 10 SS 36-12.2 4.5+' 50/4" 40 ,. DIVISion lines bel' .. een depoSits represent appro)[unate boundaries beh&deg;.'een S!)III}PCS. in-sllll, the tranSItion may be gradual DRILL RIG NO. 315 DATE COMPLETED 8"18"08 ----'-'--'-''-------
JOB L"72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' \l AT END OF BORING ___ --'-R"'oc:ta.:::r"'y_W'-'-=a-=-sh"---__ _ l' 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTION S Firm brown and gray clayey SAND and GRAVEL, damp (SC-GC) Firm brown and gray SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) \S-2: % Gravel = 1 I % Sand = 95 % Silt and Clav 4 S-5: % Gravel = 24 % Sand = 72 % Silt and Clay = 4 Firm gray SAND, some gravel, occasional Cobbles, saturated (SP) Firm gray SAND, saturated (SP) Firm gray silty fine to medium SAND, saturated (SM) S-9: (LL, PL, PI) = 28, 14, 14 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 8 % Silt = 59 % Clay = 32 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, trace sand, trace gravel, moist (CL) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel. occasional silt searns, damp ICL-IVILl _ --' rage 1 of 3 Co OJ OJ '" z H OJ ;;! '" !3 (f) '" &deg; .., W '" W u ::i! Co (f) H 0 o " U 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 PRO,IECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING ,-1-=2-,-1 __ _ DATE STARTED _-,8,--1.:.:8,--",08,,--_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5.,.8.:.7'-',1 _____ _ END OF BORI NG _--=4:::8,,7.:.,1'--___ _ Co "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV, NO. TYPE -42,0 545.1 -V -xl 11 SS 16-13,0 4.0' 124.7 25 ---
-Xl 12 SS 15-9.7 9.22 133.5 34 -52,0 535.1 -13 SS 26-9,9 3.5' 50/3" --58,0 529,1 IX. 14 SS 17-29 5011" .. .. IX* 15 ss 27--:: 24-24 .-.......:::
68.0 519.1 --'" IX 16 SS 14-14,5 7,73 121.1 -; 17-20 -/: ---xl 17 SS 14-15.7 2,5' 118,3 23 --? -? -rt1lxl 18 5S 16-13,3 6.23 124.0 16*18 ......J..1LI
__ , .. DRILL RIG NO, 315 01'/'510n hnes bel .. cen depoSits represent approxllna!C bOllildarics bel\".ecn sOlllypes. In-situ. tile tranSition be gradual DATE COMPLETED 8-18-08 ---'-'-'-'-
JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' '\! AT END OF BORING ___ __ _ ... 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS very tougn to hard gray very silty GLAY, lillie sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, damp (CL-Ml) S-11 : (ll, Pl, PI) = 23, 12, 11 % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 20 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 24 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Dense to very dense gray SAND and GRAVEL, occasional Cobbles and Boulders, saturated (SP-GP) Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-17: (ll, Pl, PI) = 25,12,13 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 19 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 27 ----Page 2 of 3   
,... '" '" u. z H '" i;! u. !3 Ul 3 0 .., '" "' '" U c' Ul H Cl " 00 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORI NG .:.1--=2:..:1'-----
__ _ DATE STARTED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-.::0:.8_ ELEVATIONS
___ _ END OF BORING _--=4 ..
___ _ ,... 00 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. '" NO. .., TYPE 80 ---IX_ -19 SS 10-13.4 4.5+" 21 85 -87.0 500.1 --IX 20 SS 11-17.5 3.5' 26 90 ---95 -!X 21 SS 15-13.2 4.5+* 25 ---100 -10122 SS 20-10.3 4.5+" 29-37 ----105 -----110 --
-
-
--115 -----120 " DRILL RIG NO. 315 D,VISion lines bell.cen deposits represent approxllnatc boumlMlcs beh':een 5011 types. in-situ. the IranSI\lon may be gractl1at Ii &--131 DATE COMPLETED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-..:::0.::8_ JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING ___ ---'R"'o"'t.::a:Jry'--W=a":'s"h __ _ T 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tOUgll to Ilard gray silty CLAY, liltle sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl-Ml) End of Boring at 100.0' . Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer. Diedrich 0-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer Page 3 of 3 Boring I 1-20 1-21 EXYWIT Z5701-1 BORING LOCATION ZION .NUCLEARPo\&#xa5;ER PLANT ISFSI SITE #1 *. ,""'. 587.2 587.1 N DRAWN BY: TRP TESTING SERVICE CORPORA nON CHECKED BY: 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE . . * . (L .mJ CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 JOB NO.: L-72,070 1 OF 1 DATE: October 2008 ProjectslDeliverables1979802 _ crosshole.doc GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ZION, ILLINOIS Preparedfor: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION Carol Stream, illinois Prepared by: GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. St. Louis, Missouri Geotechnology, Inc. Report No. 0979802.851S September 15,2008 GEO! ECHNOlOGY, INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SAINT LOUIS* COLLINSVILLE' KANSAS CITY September 15,2007 Mr. Darin Delaney Testing Service Corporation 457 East Gundersen Drive Carol Stream, lllinois 60188  
--115 -----120 " DRILL RIG NO. 315 D,VISion lines bell.cen deposits represent approxllnatc boumlMlcs beh':een 5011 types. in-situ. the IranSI\lon may be gractl1at Ii &--131 DATE COMPLETED
_-,8:.-.:.:18:.-..:::0.::8_ JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING ___ ---'R"'o"'t.::a:Jry'--W=a":'s"h
__ _ T 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tOUgll to Ilard gray silty CLAY, liltle sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasiona l silt seams, moist (Cl-Ml) End of Boring at 100.0' . Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrome ter. Diedrich 0-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer Page 3 of 3 Boring I 1-20 1-21 EXYWIT Z5701-1 BORING LOCATION ZION .NUCLEARPo\&#xa5;ER PLANT ISFSI SITE #1 *. ,""'. 587.2 587.1 N DRAWN BY: TRP TESTING SERVICE CORPORA nON CHECKED BY:
457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE . . * . (L .mJ CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 JOB NO.: L-72,070 1 OF 1 DATE: October 2008 ProjectslDeliverables1979802
_ crosshole.doc GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ZION, ILLINOIS Preparedfor:
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION Carol Stream, illinois Prepared by: GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. St. Louis, Missouri Geotechnology, Inc. Report No. 0979802.851S September 15,2008 GEO! ECHNOlOGY, INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SAINT LOUIS* COLLINSVILLE' KANSAS CITY September 15,2007 Mr. Darin Delaney Testing Service Corporation 457 East Gundersen Drive Carol Stream, lllinois 60188  


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois  
Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois  


==Dear Mr. Delaney:==
==Dear Mr. Delaney:==
0979802.85IS Presented herein are the results of the crosshole seismic test for the referenced site. This work was conducted in general accordance with proposal P14676.00.85IS dated July 31, 2008. Presented in this report is a description of the geophysical method and data plots. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (314) 997-7440. Very truly yours, GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Glen 1. Adams Senior Geophysicist GLAlDWL:gla/sjc Copies Submitted: (3) @prifllf1don recyded paper Dougl . Lambert, P.G. Senior Project Manager-Geophysics 11816LACKLAND ROAD. SUITE 150' SAINT LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146
 
0979802.85IS Presented herein are the results of the crosshole seismic test for the referenced site. This work was conducted in general accordance with proposal P14676.00.85IS dated July 31, 2008. Presented in this report is a description of the geophysical method and data plots. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (314) 997-7440.
Very truly yours, GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Glen 1. Adams Senior Geophysicist GLAlDWL:gla/sjc Copies Submitted:  
(3) @prifllf1don recyded paper Dougl . Lambert, P.G. Senior Project Manager-Geophysics 11816LACKLAND ROAD. SUITE 150' SAINT LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146
* 314/997-7440
* 314/997-7440
* FAX: 314/997-2067 GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0979802.85IS 1.0 IN1RODUCTION ............................................................................................................. I 1.1 Site Description ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METI:lODOLOGY .............................................................................. 1 3.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................... : .................................. 1 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location and Topography ....................................................................................................... 1 Plan of Site and Boring Locations .................................................................................................. 2 Relative Borehole Locations ......................................................................................................... .3 Shear (S) Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus vs. Depth .............................................................. .4 Compressional (P) Wave Velocity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus vs. Depth ............... 5 Summary Table -Crosshole Results .............................................................................................. 6 Source Boring Deviation ................................................................................................................ 7 Geophone Boring I Deviation ....................................................................................................... 8 Geophone Boring 2 Deviation ........................................................................................................ 9 APPENDIX Limitations of Report ..................................................................................................................... A GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS  
* FAX: 314/997-2067 GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0979802.85IS 1.0 IN1RODUCTION  
..................................................
...............
......................
....................
.. I 1.1 Site Description  
.......................
.....................
...........
..........................
.................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work .............................
.................................
........................................
. 1 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METI:lODOLOGY  
...................
...........................................................
1 3.0 RESULTS ...............................................................
........................ : ..................................
1 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location and Topography  
.......................
.....................
.............................
.............................
. 1 Plan of Site and Boring Locations  
...............................
.....................
...........
...................................
2 Relative Borehole Locations  
.....................................
............
.............
..............................
.............  
.3 Shear (S) Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus vs. Depth ........................................................
...... .4 Compressional (P) Wave Velocity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus vs. Depth ...............
5 Summary Table -Crosshole Results ..................
.........................
...............
...............
.....................
6 Source Boring Deviation  
.........
.............................................
.................................................
.........
7 Geophone Boring I Deviation  
.................................
.................
.................................
..............
...... 8 Geophone Boring 2 Deviation  
............................
..................
...............
...............
..............
..........
.... 9 APPENDIX Limitations of Report .........
....................................
..........................
..................................
............
A GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS  


==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
0979802.851S 1.1 Site Description. The site consists of an existing nuclear power plant near Zion, illinois. A site location map is presented on Plate 1. The crosshole borings were located approximately 900 feet soufu of fue switch yard within the plant perimeter fence, as shown on the site plan on Plate 2. 1.2 Scope of Work. The scope of work included mobilizing geophysical equipment and personnel to the site, conducting a crosshole seismic test, and processing/interpreting the data. The seismic data were processed, and shear and compressional wave velocities were calculated to detennine dynamic soil properties. The seismic data were plotted and the results are presented in this report. Engineering analysis or reco=endations based on this data are outside our scope of work. 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY The crosshole seismic testing method involves generating compressional (P) and shear (S) wave seismic energy at periodic depth intervals within a borehole and measuring the seismic wave travel-times at geophones situated at the source depth between two adjacent boreholes (per ASTM Standard D4428). The seismic wave arrivals at the geophones are transmitted through cables to the seismograph for digital recording. The data are interpreted by analyzing the differences in elapsed travel-time from the source to geophones. P-and S-wave velocities can be calculated for each depfu interval by analyzing the travel-time data. The distance between boreholes may vary wifu depth; fuerefore borehole deviation logging is conducted to adjust fue borehole separation distance wifu depfu for the velocity calculations. 3.0 RESULTS Crosshole seismic testing was conducted using a source boring and two adjacent receiver (geophone) borings, indicated as Borings 1-20 (source), 1-20A (Geophone 1), and I-20B (Geophone 2), respectively, as shown on Plate 3. Crosshole data were recorded on 5-foot intervals throughout the depfu of fue borings. Due to a physical limitation of the crosshole equipment, data could only be collected to a depfu of 97 -feet from the surface. The borings were cased to   
 
========================c-!!! Testing Service Corporation September 15, 2008 Page 2 0979802.851S approximately 99-feet and the downhole equipment requires approximately 2-feet from the bottom of the casing to collect data. Seismic velocities calculated between the source boring and the two geophone borings are presented on Plates 4 and 5. A table of all tabulated values and velocities is presented on Plate 6. Plates 7 through 9 are plots of the deviation from vertical for the three borings used for the crosshole test. Due to the inherent noise in the earth, and lateral variations in soil velocities between the test borings, some variations in velocities were calculated between the two receiver holes. An average velocity is plotted on the crosshole data plots that allows a smoother fit to the data. Densities used for the moduli calculations were based on lab values provided by the client as wet uoit weights. @ Ill/nrad (In I,cycled paper NOTES Plan adapted from a 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. map for Zion, illinois Quadrangle, last revised In 1993. 1 INC. ENGINEERING NlD ENVIRONfwENTAlSERVICES ST. LOUIS* COUlNSV1lJ.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois PLATE 1 NOTES --. "
0979802.851S 1.1 Site Description.
The site consists of an existing nuclear power plant near Zion, illinois. A site location map is presented on Plate 1. The crosshole borings were located approximately 900 feet soufu of fue switch yard within the plant perimeter fence, as shown on the site plan on Plate 2. 1.2 Scope of Work. The scope of work included mobilizing geophysical equipment and personnel to the site, conducting a crosshole seismic test, and processing/interpreting the data. The seismic data were processed, and shear and compressional wave velocities were calculated to detennine dynamic soil properties.
The seismic data were plotted and the results are presented in this report. Engineering analysis or reco=endations based on this data are outside our scope of work. 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY The crosshole seismic testing method involves generating compressional (P) and shear (S) wave seismic energy at periodic depth intervals within a borehole and measuring the seismic wave travel-times at geophones situated at the source depth between two adjacent boreholes (per ASTM Standard D4428). The seismic wave arrivals at the geophones are transmitted through cables to the seismograph for digital recording.
The data are interpreted by analyzing the differences in elapsed travel-time from the source to geophones.
P-and S-wave velocities can be calculated for each depfu interval by analyzing the travel-time data. The distance between boreholes may vary wifu depth; fuerefore borehole deviation logging is conducted to adjust fue borehole separation distance wifu depfu for the velocity calculations.
3.0 RESULTS Crosshole seismic testing was conducted using a source boring and two adjacent receiver (geophone)  
: borings, indicated as Borings 1-20 (source),
1-20A (Geophone 1), and I-20B (Geophone 2), respectively, as shown on Plate 3. Crosshole data were recorded on 5-foot intervals throughout the depfu of fue borings.
Due to a physical limitation of the crosshole equipment, data could only be collected to a depfu of 97 -feet from the surface.
The borings were cased to   
========================c
-!!! Testing Service Corporation September 15, 2008 Page 2 0979802.851S approximately 99-feet and the downhole equipment requires approximately 2-feet from the bottom of the casing to collect data. Seismic velocities calculated between the source boring and the two geophone borings are presented on Plates 4 and 5. A table of all tabulated values and velocities is presented on Plate 6. Plates 7 through 9 are plots of the deviation from vertical for the three borings used for the crosshole test. Due to the inherent noise in the earth, and lateral variations in soil velocities between the test borings, some variations in velocities were calculated between the two receiver holes. An average velocity is plotted on the crosshole data plots that allows a smoother fit to the data. Densities used for the moduli calculations were based on lab values provided by the client as wet uoit weights.  
@ Ill/nrad (In I,cycled paper NOTES Plan adapted from a 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. map for Zion, illinois Quadrangle, last revised In 1993. 1 INC. ENGINEERING NlD ENVIRONfwENTAlSERVICES ST. LOUIS* COUlNSV1lJ.E*
KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois PLATE 1 NOTES --. "
* 1.:20 (SOURpe) : (GEQPH9NJ:! 1} 1-208 (GEOPHONE Z) 1. Plan adapted from an aerial photograph courtesy of Google Earth. LEGEND
* 1.:20 (SOURpe) : (GEQPH9NJ:! 1} 1-208 (GEOPHONE Z) 1. Plan adapted from an aerial photograph courtesy of Google Earth. LEGEND
* Boring Location / I I ,.. V ., / t ' o 300 --600 ! SCALE IN FEET PLATE 2 10 8 6 4 2 *2 -4 .fl. *10 1_-------19.9811-------** .. 10.5 II 2 4 6 SOURCE 9.48ft 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 GEOPHONE1 GEOPHONE2 ----------INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SERVICES ST. LOUIS* COLlJNSVIUE. CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion. Illinois PLATE 3 Shear Wave Velocity (!psi 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 0.0 5.0 ---,.1>>-10.0 .. +tJ"-:--* ---:-----i----15.0 20.0 25.0 ---.... ____ . __ 4-____ I-___ ___ _ 30.0 I 1 I I I I 35.0 _ 40.0 5. 450 J:
* Boring Location  
* is.. SO.O a 55.0 60.0 ---.... ----l-------at-------.... ----+----1-... t----... ----65.0 I I I I I I 70.0 75.0 ---,----{-----:----{-.o-:----,----80.0 ._-85.0 90.0 95.0 ---7 ----:------------+ ----1-----it'"" ----4 ----I.VS(S-Gl) .VS(S-G2) DVS eAVERAGEVS I Soil DescripUoo Sand SiR Clay 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 .c . 15. so.o 55.0 SO.O 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 Shear Modulus (Ksil . 20 40 60 80 __ -----+-:-------l-------+ --------------1--------4" -----+-------, , , -------:--------.. ---i --------------[--------{------.+--------------:-------l---+---+--------------:-----.. ------7 --------_____ ___ , , , -------:---------.-----------------:-----+l-------+ --------------!--------!$ -----+-------INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SBMCES ST. LOUIS* COWNsvtL1.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois COMPRESSION (P) Waw Velocity (fps) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0.0 I I 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 . ii 50.0 2l 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 I I I I ----,-----,------r-----T------4i-ef-----I ______ L.. _____ .L ____ _ I I I I I I I I -----.,------r------1" ---------C .. 1-&:'--.-----:------+ ----------+ _____ _____ ______ I J I I -----.. --+--D---I I I I -----1'.----r------1" ----------1 ----3-:---.-:------i-----------{------ofo------{------.... :1---++ -----... ---_____ l _____ J ______ L _____ L [ .VP(S-G1) -.W(5-G2) ow .AVERAGEW I Soil Descr1ption Sand Silt Clay Posslon's Ratio and Young's Modulus (193 ksl) 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.0 +1--I--!---+---:-"1 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 ----r -----+ -----+\------:------.:=---r -----+--------.. ----__ :1 __ L._ ----+ ------I -+ __ -_1_ ----I I I I _____ L._= ___ + _____ -I ___ 1 I I I --------T ------1------I" ---g 35.0 ,5 40.0 ! 45.0 CD 50.0 :g 55.0 60.0 m 65.0 70.0 ---------t ------t -----*,-----75.0 .... 60:0 .... ---85.0 -----t-i:'!---+ ----------+-----I I I I 90.0 -----I:::-----T-----'-----.,--+--95.0 . -----I Poisson's Ratio I
/ I I ,.. V ., / t ' o 300 --600 ! SCALE IN FEET PLATE 2 10 8 6 4 2 *2 -4 .fl. *10 1_-------19.9811-------** .. 10.5 II 2 4 6 SOURCE 9.48ft 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 GEOPHONE1 GEOPHONE2 ----------
* Y ClUng's Modulus INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONM:NTALSERVICES sr. LoutS* COlUNSVlUE* KANSAS arv Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois DEPfH (FT) SHEAR VELOCITY P-WAVE VELOCITY UNIT WEIGHT SHEAR MODULUS POISSON RATIO YOUNG'S MODULUS (AVERAGE. FTfSEC) (AVERAGE FT/SEC) (LBICU FT) (KSI) (KSI) 5 455 836 128 575 029 1483 10 752 1865 128 1573 040 44.13 15 802 1890 128 1788 039 4971 20 807 1590 128 1798 033 4771 25 866 1609 128 20.84 030 54.01 30 1246 2030 130 43.81 020 104.91 35 1159 2379 109 31.75 034 85.38 40 1371 2921 120 4895 036 13302 45 1420 4263 131 5736 044 164.92 50 1371 2970 124 5059 036 138.06 55 1272 3360 124 43.52 0.42 123.29 60 1184 3230 118 3590 042 102.12 65 1066 2839 107 26.39 0.42 74.85 70 1181 2806 115 3476 039 9686 75 1390 2890 114 4776 035 12896 80 1528 4208 131 66.37 0.42 169.04 85 1302 3073 127 46.70 0.39 129.88 90 1193 3963 115 35.54 045 10306 95 1304 5448 115 4246 047 12481 97 1279 5200 122 43.34 047 12723 Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy: eM Dais; 011-15-08 Dais; 1 Iisio 8 .GEOTECHNOLOGY'NC. ENGINEERING AND ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVIU.E. KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois SUMMARY TABLE
INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl..
SERVICES ST. LOUIS* COLlJNSVIUE.
CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion. Illinois PLATE 3 Shear Wave Velocity (!psi 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 0.0 5.0 ---,.1>>-
10.0 .. +tJ"-:--* ---:-----i----
15.0 20.0 25.0 ---.... ____ . __ 4-____ I-___ ___ _ 30.0 I 1 I I I I 35.0
_ 40.0 5. 450 J:
* is.. SO.O a 55.0 60.0 ---.... ----l-------at-------.... ----+----1-... t----... ----65.0 I I I I I I 70.0 75.0 ---,----{-----:----{-.o-:----,----80.0 ._-85.0 90.0 95.0 -- ---:------------+ ----1-----it'"" ----4 ----I.VS(S-Gl) .VS(S-G2) DVS eAVERAGEVS I Soil DescripUoo Sand SiR Clay 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 .c . 15. so.o 55.0 SO.O 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 Shear Modulus (Ksil . 20 40 60 80 __  
-----+-:-------l-------+ -------
-------1--------4" -----+-------, , ,  
-------:--------.. ---i --------------[--------{--
----.+--------------:-------l---+---+-------
-------:-----
.. ------7 --------_____ ___ , , ,  
-------:---------.----------
-------:-----+l-------+ --------------!--------!$ -----+-------INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl..
SBMCES ST. LOUIS* COWNsvtL1.E*
KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois COMPRESSION (P) Waw Velocity (fps) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0.0 I I 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 . ii 50.0 2l 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 I I I I ----,-----,------r-----T------4i-ef-----I ______ L.. _____ .L ____ _ I I I I I I I I  
-----.,------r------1" ---------C .. 1-&:'--.-----:------+ ----------+
_____ _____ ______ I J I I -----.. --+--D---I I I I -----1'.----r------1" -----
-----1 ----3-:---.-:------i-----------{-
-----ofo------{------.... :1---++ -----
... ---_____ l _____ J ______ L _____ L [ .VP(S-G1) -.W(5-G2) ow .AVERAGEW I Soil Descr1ption Sand Silt Clay Posslon's Ratio and Young's Modulus (193 ksl) 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.0 +1--I--!---+---:-
"1 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 ----r -----+ -----+\------:------.:=---r -----+--------.. ----__ :1 __ L._ ----+ ------I -+ __ -_1_ ----I I I I _____ L._= ___ + _____ -I ___
1 I I I --------T ------1------I" ---g 35.0 ,5 40.0 ! 45.0 CD 50.0 :g 55.0 60.0 m 65.0 70.0 ---------t ------t -----*,-----75.0 .... 60:0 .... ---85.0 -----t-i:'!---+ ----------+-----I I I I 90.0 -----I:::-----T-----'-----.,--+--95.0 . -----I Poisson's Ratio I
* Y ClUng's Modulus INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONM:NTALSERVICES sr. LoutS* COlUNSVlUE*
KANSAS arv Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois DEPfH (FT) SHEAR VELOCITY P-WAVE VELOCITY UNIT WEIGHT SHEAR MODULUS POISSON RATIO YOUNG'S MODULUS (AVERAGE. FTfSEC) (AVERAGE FT/SEC) (LBICU FT) (KSI) (KSI) 5 455 836 128 575 029 1483 10 752 1865 128 1573 040 44.13 15 802 1890 128 1788 039 4971 20 807 1590 128 1798 033 4771 25 866 1609 128 20.84 030 54.01 30 1246 2030 130 43.81 020 104.91 35 1159 2379 109 31.75 034 85.38 40 1371 2921 120 4895 036 13302 45 1420 4263 131 5736 044 164.92 50 1371 2970 124 5059 036 138.06 55 1272 3360 124 43.52 0.42 123.29 60 1184 3230 118 3590 042 102.12 65 1066 2839 107 26.39 0.42 74.85 70 1181 2806 115 3476 039 9686 75 1390 2890 114 4776 035 12896 80 1528 4208 131 66.37 0.42 169.04 85 1302 3073 127 46.70 0.39 129.88 90 1193 3963 115 35.54 045 10306 95 1304 5448 115 4246 047 12481 97 1279 5200 122 43.34 047 12723 Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy: eM Dais; 011-15-08 Dais; 1 Iisio 8  
.GEOTECHNOLOGY'N C. ENGINEERING AND ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVIU.E. KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois SUMMARY TABLE
* CROSSHOLE RESULTS I PLATE 6 -----  
* CROSSHOLE RESULTS I PLATE 6 -----  
--* n --nn e-..... Cl .!: .... .t 0 -:: .0 *2 0 1 0 20 30 40 5 0 z n _n OV . -Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck"d By: Ct.t App'vd .... /g." Date: rlm'R ST. LOUIS. COUJNSVILlE* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ctnIID"" ..... n, Ilun PLATE 7
--* n --nn e-..... Cl .!: .... .t 0 -:: .0 *2 0 1 0 20 30 40 5 0 z n _n OV . -Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck"d By: Ct.t App'vd .... /g." Date: rlm'R ST. LOUIS. COUJNSVILlE*
KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ctnIID"" ..... n, Ilun PLATE 7
* t , "'" * ..... II: ..... :E :; 0 . I 1:: -.0 -4 .0 0 -1.0 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 0 Z
* t , "'" * ..... II: ..... :E :; 0 . I 1:: -.0 -4 .0 0 -1.0 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 0 Z
* n "n * '" Easting (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy:6'U App'Vd Date:'}1dO;> -. AND sr. LOUIS* COWNSVIUE* KANSASQTY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ---.j ::.::;;_ ...... ,IIUN PLATE 8 An '>" 'In n iE' -CD .e = 1::: 0 0 -4 0 .0 -;; .0 -1 0 00 1 0 20 30 40 50 z . " '>" ''In A " Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'd By:(,'Z-? . App'vd Date: I Date: "II<!"" I I ... ",. IT INC. ENGiNEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVILLE* KA.NSAS arv Zion Nuclear PoWer Plant Zion, illinois 2 .. ,llun PLATE 9 APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS OF REPORT GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES LIMITATIONS OF REPORT 1. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the owner, architect, and engineer for evaluating the project as it relates to the technical aspects discussed herein. It can be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions included in this report. Unless other contractual agreements were made, the services described in this report were carried out in accordance with the Terms for Geotechnology's Services which were attached to the proposal. 2. Geotechnology endeavored to perform the crosshole seismic geophysical survey in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. The findings and conclusions stated herein must be considered not as scientific certainties, but rather as professional opinions concerning the significance of the limited data gathered during the course of the survey. No warranty, express or implied, is made. 3. The geophysical analyses and conclusions contained in this report are based on the site conditions, project layout, sampling interval, geophysical data, and interpretive procedures described herein. Geotechnology can make no interpretation of underground conditions beyond the test location. Geophysical exploration methods are indirect and potentially influenced by a variety of natural or man-made conditions. The resulting interpretations are based on the quality of the recorded data as limited by site conditions Revised 03/09/04 Stdparl9798crosshole.doc TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: PROJECT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago,IL ISFSI Project Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion,IL Carol Stream, 111inois SOIL TEST DATA LOCATION BORING NUMBER 1-20 1-20 SAMPLE NUMBER 2 7 DEPTH IN FEET 3.5 -5.0 16.0 -17.5 HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SP SP GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION GRADATION -PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % 100 100 GRADATION -PASSING 3/B" SIEVE % 95 99 GRADATION -PASSING # 4 SIEVE % 92 95 GRADATION -PASSING # 10 SIEVE % BB 91 GRADATION -PASSING # 40 SIEVE % 79 71 GRADATION -PASSING # 100 SIEVE % 14 B GRADATION -PASSING # 200 SIEVE % 6 4 SAND AND GRAVEL % 94 96 SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED % 6 4 CLAY % <<0.002 MM) LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH 9.26 SOLUBLE CHLORIDES <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % 1-20 12 2B.5 -30.0 CL 100 99 97 95 B5 77 73 27 52 21 22 11 11 11.0 129.9 TSC Job No. L -72,070 September 9, 2008 1-20 1-20 22 32 53.5 -55.0 7B.5 -BO.O CL CL 100 99 99 97 100 92 9B BB BB B4 73 16 27 50 73 34 31 17 12 10 19 7 13.4 10.7 123.7 130.7 TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago,IL PROJECT: ISFSI Project LOCATION BORING NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH IN FEET Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion,IL HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (TSF) GRADA nON -PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/8" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 4 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 10 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 40 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 100 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 200 SIEVE % SAND AND GRAVEL% SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED% CLAY % <<0.002 MMl LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH SOLUBLE CHLORIDES Carol Stream, Illinois SOIL TEST DATA 1-21 1-21 2 5 SP SP 86 86 100 79 99 76 99 71 96 62 9 7 4 4 96 96 4 4 9.11 <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % NP -Not Possible 1-21 9 CL 5.41 100 99 98 95 92 91 9 59 32 28 14 14 12.7 122.7 TSC Job No. L -72,070 September 9, 2008 1-21 11 CL NP 100 98 95 93 85 79 76 25 51 24 23 12 11 13.0 1-21 17 CL NP 100 98 97 96 89 83 78 22 51 27 25 12 113 15.7 124.7 118.3 oc z w "i 6 '" u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 41/23/83 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I I I I I I 90 ----. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 \ \ 10 , \ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 8 86 (6% Com ined) 3/8 95 #4 92 #10 88 # 40 79 # 100 14 # 200 6 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 "4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I , T I I I I I "'-I'---< 90 " 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 \ , 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I I GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY COBBLES I coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, Irace sill, clay and gravel Sample: 7 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 91 (4% Com ined) 3/8 99 #4 95 #10 91 #40 71 # 100 8 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-<U SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188   
* n "n * '" Easting (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy:6'U App'Vd Date:'}1dO;>  
" " z w '3 6 00 l,J.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I T I I I I t-90 .f'--80 70 60 " t 50 1\ "\ 40 30 20 'I'-.. 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL I SAND J SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine Icoarse medium fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel Sample: 12 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 24 52 21 3/8 99 #4 97 #10 95 #40 85 # 100 77 # 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-ZU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I * , f-l, I ----90 80 "---* \ 70 60 \ 50 40 " 1\ 30 "'---20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 22 2 100 (Cll 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 15 50 34 3/8 99 #4 99 #10 97 #40 92 # 100 88 # 200 84 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 ,-.u SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER .6 4 3 21.5 1 3/41/23/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I I I I I I I ,'-.., "'-90 " 80 \ 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Borinq: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silly CLAY, some sand (Cl) Sample: 32 2 100 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 0 27 (73% Corr bined) 3/8 100 #4 100 #10 100 # 40 98 # 100 88 # 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 13/4112 83 4 6 810141620 3040 50 70100140200 100 I I . I I 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 '\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 95 (4% Com ined) 3/8 100 #4 99 #10 99 # 40 96 # 100 9 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 5 1 314 112 318 3 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I \ I I I I I I I 90 I-80 ."" .1"----..... 70 60 II 50 40 30 20 10 1\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION BorinQ: 1-21 3 inch 100 Light brown SAND, some gravel, Irace sill Sample: 5 2 100 and clay (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 86 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 86 24 72 (4% Com ined) 3/8 79 #4 76 #10 71 #40 62 # 100 7 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 21.5 1 3/41/2 83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I I I I I r--.. 90 r-.--.. "\ 80 * \ 70 \ 60 50 40 1\ \ 30 "-20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse 1 fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, trace sand and gravel Sample: 9 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SIL T %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 8 59 32 3/8 100 #4 99 #10 98 #40 95 # 100 92 # 200 91 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-[1 SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 1141123/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I * 'i--I I I I I 90 .1'--80 "'----70 60 \ 50 I' "\ 40 30 .. 20 ". 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR CLAY COBBLES I coarse fine Icoarse medium I fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 11 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 20 51 24 3/8 98 #4 95 #10 93 -# 40 85 # 100 79 # 200 76 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-LI SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I . "l-I I I I I 90 1"1"-80 70 ... 60 '\ 50 40 " f\ 30 '. 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 17 2 100 (eL) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 19 51 27 3/8 98 #4 97 #10 96 #40 89 # 100 83 # 200 78 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-'" SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563
-. AND sr. LOUIS* COWNSVIUE*
KANSASQTY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ---.j ::.::;;_ ...... ,IIUN PLATE 8 An '>" 'In n iE' -CD .e = 1::: 0 0 -4 0 .0 -;; .0 -1 0 00 1 0 20 30 40 50 z . " '>" ''In A " Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'd By:(,'Z-? . App'vd Date: I Date: "II<!"" I I ... ",. IT INC. ENGiNEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVILLE*
KA.NSAS arv Zion Nuclear PoWer Plant Zion, illinois 2 .. ,llun PLATE 9 APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS OF REPORT GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES LIMITATIONS OF REPORT 1. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the owner, architect, and engineer for evaluating the project as it relates to the technical aspects discussed herein. It can be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions included in this report. Unless other contractual agreements were made, the services described in this report were carried out in accordance with the Terms for Geotechnology's Services which were attached to the proposal.  
: 2. Geotechnology endeavored to perform the crosshole seismic geophysical survey in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. The findings and conclusions stated herein must be considered not as scientific certainties, but rather as professional opinions concerning the significance of the limited data gathered during the course of the survey. No warranty, express or implied, is made. 3. The geophysical analyses and conclusions contained in this report are based on the site conditions, project layout, sampling  
: interval, geophysical data, and interpretive procedures described herein. Geotechnology can make no interpretation of underground conditions beyond the test location.
Geophysical exploration methods are indirect and potentially influenced by a variety of natural or man-made conditions.
The resulting interpretations are based on the quality of the recorded data as limited by site conditions Revised 03/09/04 Stdparl9798crosshole
.doc TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: PROJECT:
Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago,IL ISFSI Project Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion,IL Carol Stream, 111inois SOIL TEST DATA LOCATION BORING NUMBER 1-20 1-20 SAMPLE NUMBER 2 7 DEPTH IN FEET 3.5 -5.0 16.0 -17.5 HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SP SP GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION GRADATION -PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % 100 100 GRADATION  
-PASSING 3/B" SIEVE % 95 99 GRADATION -PASSING # 4 SIEVE % 92 95 GRADATION -PASSING # 10 SIEVE % BB 91 GRADATION -PASSING # 40 SIEVE % 79 71 GRADATION -PASSING # 100 SIEVE % 14 B GRADATION -PASSING # 200 SIEVE % 6 4 SAND AND GRAVEL % 94 96 SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED % 6 4 CLAY % <<0.002 MM) LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH 9.26 SOLUBLE CHLORIDES <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % 1-20 12 2B.5 -30.0 CL 100 99 97 95 B5 77 73 27 52 21 22 11 11 11.0 129.9 TSC Job No. L -72,070 September 9, 2008 1-20 1-20 22 32 53.5 -55.0 7B.5 -BO.O CL CL 100 99 99 97 100 92 9B BB BB B4 73 16 27 50 73 34 31 17 12 10 19 7 13.4 10.7 123.7 130.7 TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago,IL PROJECT: ISFSI Project LOCATION BORING NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH IN FEET Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion,IL HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (TSF) GRADA nON -PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/8" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 4 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 10 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 40 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 100 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 200 SIEVE % SAND AND GRAVEL% SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED% CLAY % <<0.002 MMl LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH SOLUBLE CHLORIDES Carol Stream, Illinois SOIL TEST DATA 1-21 1-21 2 5 SP SP 86 86 100 79 99 76 99 71 96 62 9 7 4 4 96 96 4 4 9.11 <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % NP -Not Possible 1-21 9 CL 5.41 100 99 98 95 92 91 9 59 32 28 14 14 12.7 122.7 TSC Job No. L -72,070 September 9, 2008 1-21 11 CL NP 100 98 95 93 85 79 76 25 51 24 23 12 11 13.0 1-21 17 CL NP 100 98 97 96 89 83 78 22 51 27 25 12 113 15.7 124.7 118.3 oc z w "i 6 '" u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 41/23/83 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I I I I I I 90 ----. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 \ \ 10 , \ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 8 86 (6% Com ined) 3/8 95 #4 92 #10 88 # 40 79 # 100 14 # 200 6 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 "4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100 140200 100 I I , T I I I I I "'-I'---< 90 " 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 \ , 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER S I I GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY COBBLES I coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, Irace sill, clay and gravel Sample: 7 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 91 (4% Com ined) 3/8 99 #4 95 #10 91 #40 71 # 100 8 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-<U SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188   
" " z w '3 6 00 l,J.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I T I I I I t-90 .f'--80 70 60 " t 50 1\ "\ 40 30 20 'I'-.. 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL I SAND J SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine Icoarse medium fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel Sample: 12 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 24 52 21 3/8 99 #4 97 #10 95 #40 85 # 100 77 # 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-ZU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I * , f-l, I ----90 80 "---* \ 70 60 \ 50 40 " 1\ 30 "'---20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 22 2 100 (Cll 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 15 50 34 3/8 99 #4 99 #10 97 #40 92 # 100 88 # 200 84 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 ,-.u SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER .6 4 3 21.5 1 3/41/23/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I I I I I I I ,'-.., "'-90 " 80 \ 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Borinq: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silly CLAY, some sand (Cl) Sample: 32 2 100 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 0 27 (73% Corr bined) 3/8 100 #4 100 #10 100 # 40 98 # 100 88 # 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 13/4112 83 4 6 810141620 3040 50 70100140200 100 I I . I I 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 '\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 95 (4% Com ined) 3/8 100 #4 99 #10 99 # 40 96 # 100 9 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 5 1 314 112 318 3 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I \ I I I I I I I 90 I-80 ."" .1"----.....
70 60 II 50 40 30 20 10 1\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER S GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION BorinQ: 1-21 3 inch 100 Light brown SAND, some gravel, Irace sill Sample: 5 2 100 and clay (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 86 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 86 24 72 (4% Com ined) 3/8 79 #4 76 #10 71 #40 62 # 100 7 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 21.5 1 3/41/2 83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I I I I I r--.. 90 r-.--.. "\ 80 * \ 70 \ 60 50 40 1\ \ 30 "-20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER S GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse 1 fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, trace sand and gravel Sample: 9 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SIL T %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 8 59 32 3/8 100 #4 99 #10 98 #40 95 # 100 92 # 200 91 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-[1 SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 1141123/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I * 'i--I I I I I 90 .1'--80 "'----70 60 \ 50 I' "\ 40 30 .. 20 ". 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR CLAY COBBLES I coarse fine Icoarse medium I fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 11 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 20 51 24 3/8 98 #4 95 #10 93 -# 40 85 # 100 79 # 200 76 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-LI SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I . "l-I I I I I 90 1"1"-80 70 ... 60 '\ 50 40 " f\ 30 '. 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 17 2 100 (eL) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 19 51 27 3/8 98 #4 97 #10 96 #40 89 # 100 83 # 200 78 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-'" SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563
* Phone (630) 778-1200
* Phone (630) 778-1200
* Fax (630) 778-1233 September 03, 2008 Mr. Darin Delaney TESTING SERVICE CORP. 360 So, Main Place Carol Stream, IL 60188 Project lD: 72070 First Environmental File ID: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008  
* Fax (630) 778-1233 September 03, 2008 Mr. Darin Delaney TESTING SERVICE CORP. 360 So, Main Place Carol Stream, IL 60188 Project lD: 72070 First Environmental File ID: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008  


==Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:==
==Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:==
The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on file for future reference. Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002045: effective 05/14/08 through 02/28/09. I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional information, please contact me at (630) 778-1200. Project Page lof4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shorc Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phonc (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Case NalTative TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 First Environmental File JD: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008 I Ftagl Descriplion I Ftag I Descriplion < Analyle not detected at or above the repotting limit. L+ LeS recovery olltside controllilllils; high biilS. D Analytc detected in associated method blank. L-LeS recovery outside controllimils; low bias. C Identification confillned by GC/MS. M MS recovery outside conlrollimils; LeS acceptable. D Surrogates diluted out; recovery not available. M+ MS recovery olltside conlrollimits high bias; LeS acceptable. E Estimated result; concentration exceeds calibrJlion range. M-MS recovery olltside control limits low bias; LeS acceptable. F Field measurement. N Analyte is 110t pmt of aliI' NELAC accreditation. G Surrogate recovcry outside control limits; matrix effect. 1-1 Analysis or extraction holding time exceedcd. Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range. K RPD outside control limits. Routine Reporting Limit (Lowest amount that can be RL detected when routine weights/volulllcs are used without dilution.) NO Analyte was not detectcd using a library search routine; No calibration standard was rumlyzcd. P Chemical preselvation pH adjusted in lab. Q 'lllC analyte was dctennined by a GC/MS dattlbase search. S T Analyte was sub-contracted to another laboratory for analysis. Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0_6&deg;C \V Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix. All quality control criteria, as outlined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the following analytical report. Sample Batch Comments: Sample acceptance criteria were met. Page 20f4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditntionll [00292 1600 Shore Rand* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Clicnt: Analytical Report TESTfNG SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 Salll pie ID: 1-20 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-00 I Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH@25&deg;C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08128/08 13:30 pH @ 25&deg;C, I: I 0 Result Method: 4500CL,C < 50 Method: 4500S04,E < 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.26 Date Collected: 08/27/08 Tillie Collected: 10:00 Date Received: Date Reported: R.L. Units 50 mg/kg ISO mg/kg Units 08/27/08 09/03/08 Flags Page 30f4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Client: Analytical Report TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 SampleID: 1-21 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-002 Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH @25&deg;C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08/28/08 13 :30 pH @ 25&deg;C, I: 1 0 Resnlt Method: 4500CL,C < 50 Method: 4500S04,E < 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.11 Date Collected: Time Collected: Date Received: Date Reported: R.L. Units 50 mglkg 150 mglkg Units 08/27/08 10:00 08/27/08 09103/08 Flags Page 4of4   
 
.. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. First Environmental Laboratories 1600 Shore Road, Suite D Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail: firstinfo@firstenv.com !EPA Certification #100292 Project 1.0.: 12010 P.O.#.: Matrix Codes: S = Soil W=Water 0= Other DatefIime Taken Sample Description ----------------FOR LAB USE ONLY: r f Cooler Temperature: Yes_ N/ I) s: ' QC Received within 6 hrs. of co ction: __ _ Ice Present: Yes_ No CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pagc __ of __ pgs Name: Streel Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: e-mail: Send Report To:... Via: Fax 0 cornall 0 Sampled By: ,I I 1/1 I hi 7 Analyses Matrix Comments Lab LD. B-] 5 -------------_ .. --Sample Refrigerated: Yes_ No_ Containers Received Preserved: 0 No Refrigerator Temperature: ___ 'C 5035 Vials Frozen: Yes_ No_ Freezer Temperature: ___ 'C Notes and Special Instructions: ____________________________________________________ _ Relinquished By: r j ), .A? DatefJlme Q-2.t-6:':1 <? z.' 3 ., Received By: I -j..----0 \, ../ DalefJlme v { v 'I II v '-" ( Relinquished By: DatefIime Received By: r Date!Time ___ 1 ________ _ Rc\'.-'lOIl}}
The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on file for future reference.
Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002045: effective 05/14/08 through 02/28/09. I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional informati on, please contact me at (630) 778-1200. Project Page lof4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shorc Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phonc (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Case NalTative TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 First Environmental File JD: 8-3902 Date Received:
August 27, 2008 I Ftagl Descriplion I Ftag I Descriplion  
< Analyle not detected at or above the repotting limit. L+ LeS recovery olltside controllilllil s; high biilS. D Analytc detected in associated method blank. L-LeS recovery outside controllimils; low bias. C Identification confillned by GC/MS. M MS recovery outside conlrollimil s; LeS acceptable.
D Surrogates diluted out; recovery not available. M+ MS recovery olltside conlrollimit s high bias; LeS acceptabl
: e. E Estimated result; concentration exceeds calibrJlion range. M-MS recovery olltside control limits low bias; LeS acceptable
. F Field measurement. N Analyte is 110t pmt of aliI' NELAC accreditation
. G Surrogate recovcry outside control limits; matrix effect. 1-1 Analysis or extraction holding time exceedcd.
Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range. K RPD outside control limits. Routine Reporting Limit (Lowest amount that can be RL detected when routine weights/volulllcs are used without dilution.) NO Analyte was not detectcd using a library search routine; No calibration standard was rumlyzcd. P Chemical preselvation pH adjusted in lab. Q 'lllC analyte was dctennined by a GC/MS dattlbase search. S T Analyte was sub-contracted to another laboratory for analysis. Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0_6&deg;C \V Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix. All quality control criteria, as outlined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the following analytical report. Sample Batch Comments: Sample acceptance criteria were met. Page 20f4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditntionll [00292 1600 Shore Rand* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Clicnt: Analytical Report TESTfNG SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 Salll pie ID: 1-20 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-00 I Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH@25&deg;C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08128/08 13:30 pH @ 25&deg;C, I: I 0 Result Method: 4500CL,C  
< 50 Method: 4500S04,E  
< 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.26 Date Collected:
08/27/08 Tillie Collected: 10:00 Date Received:
Date Reported:
R.L. Units 50 mg/kg ISO mg/kg Units 08/27/08 09/03/08 Flags Page 30f4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Client: Analytical Report TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 SampleID: 1-21 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-00 2 Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH @25&deg;C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08/28/08 13 :30 pH @ 25&deg;C, I: 1 0 Resnlt Method: 4500CL,C  
< 50 Method: 4500S04,E  
< 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.11 Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Date Received:
Date Reported:
R.L. Units 50 mglkg 150 mglkg Units 08/27/08 10:00 08/27/08 09103/08 Flags Page 4of4   
.. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. First Environmental Laboratories 1600 Shore Road, Suite D Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail: firstinfo@firstenv.com  
!EPA Certification  
#100292 Project 1.0.: 12010 P.O.#.: Matrix Codes: S = Soil W=Water 0= Other DatefIime Taken Sample Description  
----------------FOR LAB USE ONLY: r f Cooler Temperature
:
Yes_ N/ I) s: ' QC Received within 6 hrs. of co ction: __ _ Ice Present: Yes_ No CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pagc __ of __ pgs Name: Streel Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: e-mail: Send Report To:... Via: Fax 0 cornall 0 Sampled By: ,I I 1/1 I hi 7 Analyses Matrix Comments Lab LD. B-] 5 -------------_ .. --Sample Refrigerated
: Yes_ No_ Containers Received Preserved: 0 No Refrigerator Temperature:
___ 'C 5035 Vials Frozen: Yes_ No_ Freezer Temperature:
___ 'C Notes and Special Instructions:
______________
_______________
_______________________ _ Relinquished By: r j ), .A? DatefJlme Q-2.t-6:':1  
<? z.' 3 ., Received By: I -j..----0 \, ../ DalefJlme v { v 'I II v '-" ( Relinquished By: DatefIime Received By: r Date!Time
___ 1 ________ _ Rc\'.-'lOIl}}

Revision as of 23:12, 30 June 2018

TSC Report No. L-72,070, Report of Soils Exploration Zion Solutions Zion Nuclear Power Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Final - 10-2-08
ML15188A190
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/2008
From:
Testing Service Corp
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Sargent & Lundy
Shared Package
ML15188A105 List:
References
ZS-2015-0084 L-72, 070
Download: ML15188A190 (49)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS October 2, 2008 L -72,070 ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION PREPARED FOR: SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 55 EAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PREPARED BY: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 (630) 653-3920 Section I. TEXT 1.0 2.0 Introduction Field Work TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ............ .......... .......... ....................... 2 2 3.0 Geophysica l Testing ................................ ....*.......... 4 4.0 5.0 Laboratory Testing Closure 4 5 II. APPENDIX REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION

1.0 INTRODUCTION

October 2, 2008 L-72,070 Presented in this report are the results of the soils investigation performed to determine the general subsurface conditions for the proposed construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage facility. The proposed structure will be constructed at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Zion, IL. This work was performed in general accordance with Technical Specification Subsurface Investigation Specification Z-5701 prepared by Sargent and Lundy and dated July 29, 2008. 2.0 FIELD WORK A total of two(2) soil borings (1-20 and 1-21) were performed for this project with each of them being extended to a depth of 100.0 feet. Boring 1-20 was subsequently converted into a seismic cross hole survey source hole. Additionally, two (2) boreholes were drilled and completed with 3" PVC casing for cross hole seismic testing. Upon completion of the drilling and testing, ground surface elevations as well as Northing and Easting coordinates were determined for the drilling locations using a Trimble R8 GPS. The vertical and horizontal data shown on the Boring Location Plan was retrieved from a National Geodetic Survey data base located approximately 1.2 miles south of Zion, Illinois. Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 The boreholes were initially advanced by 4 1/4" hollow stem auger methods to the ground water table and then completed by rotary wash methods using bentonite and potable water in accordance with ASTM D 5783. Upon completion, each borehole was sealed with cement-bentonite grout placed by tremie methods. Soil samples were collected at 1-20 on 2.5 foot intervals for the entire 100 foot depth. At location 1-20 the sampling interval was 2.5 feet for the first 10 feet and 5.0 feet thereafter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) -N Values (ASTM D 1586), were determined using an automatic hammer which allows a 140 pound weight to free fall from a 30 inch drop to drive the sampler. The samples were collected using standard split spoon procedures during SPT since granular soils and/or very stiff clays prevented the use of Shelby tube samplers. Liners were not used with the split spoon samplers. Dynamic energy measurements have not been made on this automatic hammer. However, Pile Driving Analyzer's (PDA) have been used to process dynamic measurements of strain and acceleration between the drill string and similar hammers made by the same manufacturer (Boart Longyear). The Average Energy Transfer Ratio is accepted as 75% for this model hammer. The soil types were logged in the field by the drill crew and representative portions of each sample were contained in glass jars per ASTM D 4220 and brought back to our laboratory. Boring Logs defining the soil lithology and ground water observations is included in the Appendix of this report. Ground water depth was determined during hollow stem auger drilling only. The borings were completed using wet rotary methods and therefore, the water levels inside the boreholes at the completion of the drilling were not representative. PVC casing was installed shortly after the completion of the drilling and reaming at location 1-20. Boring 1-21 was sealed with grout immediately following the drilling and sampling to prevent an open hole hazard. Therefore, 24 hour water level readings were not obtained. The ground water depth measured during the hollow stem auger drilling is considered the most accurate indication of the undisturbed ground water levels at the site. Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 3.0 GEOPHYSICAL TESTING Geophysical testing consisting of a Cross Hole Seismic Investigation, was performed at location 1-20. The original bore hole (1-20) was reamed to a depth of 100 feet using a 6" tri cone roller bit and then cased with 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-benton ite grout. Two additional holes (1-20A and 1-20B) were drilled using a 6" tri cone roller bit to a depth of 100 feet and were located in a straight line at approximate distances of 10 and 20 feet from 1-20. These bore holes were also completed with the installation of 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-bentoni te grout. The Cross Hole testing was performed by Geotechno logy, Inc. In general conformance with Section 4.31 of ASTM 04428. A copy of the report prepared by Geotechno logy, Inc. summarizing the test results is included in the Appendix of this report. Following the testing each of the PVC casings were sealed with bentonite chips which were hydrated upon placement. In addition the PVC was cut off near the ground surface and topsoil was place over the holes. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obtained from the borings were examined in our laboratory and visually classified according to the Unified Soils Classification System (ASTM 0 2488). Cohesive soils were measured for moisture content (ASTM 0 2216) and unconfined compressive strength (ASTM 0 2166). Additional testing including grain size distribution (ASTM 0422, 0 1140), Alterberg Limits (ASTM 04318), pH (ASTM G 51) and dry unit weight determinations (EM 1110-2-1906) were performed on samples selected by Sargent and Lundy. The results of this testing has been summarized and incorporated into the Soil Test data Sheets included in the Appendix. Two (2) soil samples selected by the client were analyzed for soluble chlorides (Method 4500CL,C) and soluble sulfates (Method 4500S04, E) by First Environmental Laboratories. A copy of their report is Appended. Sargent & Lundy L -72,070 October 2, 2008 5.0 CLOSURE The data and results presented in this report are based upon the conditions encountered at the two (2) locations investigated as indicated on the Soil Boring Location Plan. This report does not reflect any variations that may occur between these locations, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until the construction phase of the project. We are appreciative of the opportunit y to assist you with this project and look forward to working with you in the future. Please call if you have any questions or are in need of further information. Respectfully Submitted, Machalinski Vice !'5resident Registered Professional Engineer Illinois No. 062-038559 Prepared By,. Darin Delaney Project Geologist APPENDIX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION CHART LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS TWO (2) BORING LOGS (6 pages) BORING LOCATION PLAN (1 page) GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT Geotechnology, Inc. (16 pages) SOIL DATA SHEETS (12 pages) TWO (2) ANALYTICAL REPORTS First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (5 pages) H

  • x TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION UNIFlEO CLASSIFICATION CHART 0 0 " " z " -CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNING GROUP SYMBOLS AND GROUP tlAMES USING LABORATORY TESTS 0 GRAVELS Mort Ihon CLEAN GRAVELS of CGo'U Lus Ihon 5°10 ,.oclion relolned fines C Cu <4 ond/o. I> Cc > 3 e 00 No.4 siev.. GRAVELS WITH Fines (Iouify as ML 0' Mil SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP HW80L GW GP GM GROUP NAME b Poo.lyg'oded g.ovel f Silly g.ovt'l f,O,1I GC Cloyey q.ovel f ,q ,II FINES Mo.e Ilion Fines clossHy os CL or CH 0 f-____________ i ,,,, w 0 _0 * " , o o , SANDS 50 °/0 0' more of eoo,st' Iroclion pOISU No.4 sieve CLEAN SANDS Lus Ilion 5 °/0 ,jnes d SANDS WITII FINES Mo,e Ilion 120/0 flnt's" Cu'-:'60nd/o' I> Cc!>3e Fines clossj,y as ML o. Mil Fines clossi'y as CL 0< CH SW SP SM SC CL Wt'II-q'oded sond , Poo.ly q.oded liond 1 Silly sand 0,11,' Cloyt'y sand 0, II, I Leon cloy k ,I,m 0 SILTS e CLAYS Liquid limil leu Ilion 500/0 PI:> 7 ond plols on or above "A' line j Ino.qon;c f-------------------

--'-----------------------


+----+


_1 0 PI <: 4 a. plots bt'low .. A" line j z . , w ** z ** ;; O,oonic Liquid Ii mil oven dried Liquid limil -nol dried "'" 0.75 * ". o P I plats on a. obove "A' line , w 0 z , ;:;: :; SILTS {} CLAYS Liquid limil 50 0/0 a. mo.e PI plotli bela .. A line Orqonic liquid limil -oven droed <0 Liquid limil -nol dried . IHOhly a.oanic soits Primarily o.gonic motte',dork 'n color, and oJonic ado.

  • o. BaHd onlhe molt.lol passing Ihe J-in 175-mm) Ileve. b.1I field cOnloil'led cobbles ond/o. boulders,odd " .. ith cobbles al'ld/o' boulder" 10 g.oup nome. c. Grovels wilh 510 12 ala fint'S require dual symbols GW-GM 1,,11 oroded grovel .. ith sill GW-GC .. ell oroded grovel .. ith cloy GP -GM poorly (traded growel .. illl s.1t GP-GC poorly qroded q.ovel .. illI cloy d. Sands .. illl 5010 10 12 °/0 fil'les ** quire duol symbols SW-SM .. ell (traded sond .. ill, silt .. SW-SC .. til (traded SOlid .. illI clOl SP -SM poo.ly I)rod.d sOl'ld .. ilt, s;lI Sf>-SC poo"y g.oded sand .. illI cloy , C _ (030' " soil conlains 15 0/0 SOlld,Odd" .. itll sand" 10 I)roup nom *. g.1f finesclonilyos CL-ML,lIu dual symbol GC-GM,SC-SM.

II. It fil'lu art' aJonie,odd .. itll o.gonic fines" 10 ?rOUP l'Iome. I II soil conloil'l l? 15 °/0 orovel,odd" .. ilh orov.I' 10 I)roup nome. 0 ML Sill .,I,m OL O'oonic cloy .,I,m,n Organic sill -, I ,m,o '" roO cloy k,I,m M" Eloslic sill k,l,m 0" O.qonic cloy*,I,m,P OJonic sill k,I,m,q PT Pt'ol I. If Alle.berg limits pial 11'1 hOlched area, soil is a CL-ML, ,illy cloy. k.1I soil conloins 1510 29 °/0 plus No. 200,odd " .. "hsond" Or "",illl 9rovt'I" .... hichever 'S predominol'll. .... soil conloins?;,. 30°10 plus No. 200,p.edomll'lonlly !ol'ld, odd "sandy" 10 (t.oup nome. m.1I soil °/oP11l5 Na.200,p'eda rninOl'llly Olavel, odd orovrIlY 10 oroup nome. and plols 01'101 obovt"h" IIl'Ie. o. 4 0. plols btto .. ':{Io':, line. :: IIl'Ie. V / V // / 0 V :? / / v' 0 / // / -. V / 0 V V * // / 'v MH OR 0 0 V / / // / 0 r --;;; / V ML 0 OL L-ML)!:; '///,Y oV 0 , o '0 JO .0 '0 .0 10 80 90 '00 L10UID LIMIT ( LLl FILL TOPSOIL SAMPLE TYPE: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS -.... ---..... PEAT GRAVEL SS Split Spoon ST Thin:Walied Tube A = Auger SAND SILT CLAY FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST DATA: N = Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot Wc Qu In-Situ Water Content Unconfined Compressive Strength in Tons per Square Foot DOLOMITE

  • Pocket Penetrometer Measurement; Maximum Reading = 4.5 tsf yD Dry Unit Weight in Pounds per Cubic Foot WATER LEVELS: SOIL DESCRIPTION: V \l ... While Drilling End of Boring 24 Hours MATERIAL BOULDER COBBLE Coarse GRAVEL Small GRAVEL Coarse SAND Medium SAND Fine SAND SILT and CLAY COHESIVE SOILS CONSISTENCY Qu Very Soft Soft Stiff Tough Very Tough Hard Less than 0.3 0.3 to 0.6 0.6 to 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 2.0 to 4.0 4.0 and over MODIFYING TERM Trace linle Some PARTICLE SIZE RANGE Over 12 inches 12 inches to 3 inches 3 inches to '/. inch '/. inch to No.4 Sieve No.4 Sieve to No.1 0 Sieve No. 10 Sieve to No. 40 Sieve No. 40 Sieve to No. 200 Sieve Passing No. 200 Sieve COHESIONLESS SOILS RELATIVE DENSITY Very Loose Loose Firm Dense Very Dense PERCENT BY WEIGHT 1 -10 10 -20 20 -35 _N_ 0-4 4 -10 10 -30 30 -50 50 and over

.... "' "' "' z H "' "' is Ul :;: 0 ,.., "' III "' U .... Ul H Cl Q " o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-20 '-="'-----DATE ST ARTED _-,8,-.. ELEVATIONS ___ _ END OF BORING ___ _ ,.: (90 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC au DEPTH ELEV. NO. TYPE -> -' , 1 SS 5* 11*13 3.0 584.2 .. Ixi -> < 2 SS 2* 2*4 5.5 581.7 -... X* -3 SS 2* , 1-1 -' .. X* -. 4 SS 1* 2*3 10.5 576.7 -...... xl -' .. 5 SS 8* , . 10-12 -' ... . . -... 6 SS 7* -: .... 8-10 ;....;....; 15.5 571.7 -,",', Ixl -' .... 7 SS 9* 23*22 -' -" *x. 8 SS 10* -' 17-19 -' .. xl 9 SS 13* -. 14*21 23.0 564.2 -xl 10 SS 14* -' 30*29 25.5 561.7 -tl -11 SS 8-26.6 5*5 28.0 559.2 -12 SS 8-11.0 4.5+' 129.9 -10*11 --13 SS 8* 11.2 6.73 128.4 9*13 --xl 14 SS 7* 20.5 4.73 108.5 -7*10 -xl -15 SS 10* 12.8 6.90 125.2 14-15 38.0 549.2 -IX. 16 SS 31* 14.8 120.4 5015" .. DRILL RIG NO. 315 DIVISion lines beh.ccn depoSits represent dppro-:irna le boundClli (!s Ilel::een sOlllWes IIl-S!Il1. the transition may ba grmJlI<l1 DATE COMPLETED _-'8 ..... 1.:..4.:.. .. "'0.:..8_ JOB L .. 72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M"'u::.d::..:..R:::o..::ta:..:r,Ly-'W"'a:::s:..:h-'-__ ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Firm brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) v Loose brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) \ S-2: % Graval = 8 / % Sand = 86 oj" Silt and -6 Loose dark gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Firm gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) S-7: % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 91 % Silt and Clay = 4 Dense gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Dense gray fine SAND, trace silt, saturated (SP-SM) Firm gray sandy SILT, saturated (Ml) S-12: (ll, Pl, PI) 22,11,11 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 24 % Silt = 52 % Clay = 21 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, very moist (Ml) Page 1 of 3 f-< '" '" u. z H '" u. g; UJ :;: 0 '"' '" 00 '" f-< UJ H " § o u i" PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Pow0'...r.'.P .. la .. n ... t __ _ CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING .'.1-.=2c::.0 __ _ DATE STARTED _--,8'...-.:.:12::.-",08:::....._ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE _-'5,,8 .. 7 ... 2=--___ _ END OF BORING _..::4,,8 .. 7 .. ,2=--___ _ ;..; "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. NO. TYPE 55 60 65 40.5 546.7 --I -17 SS 11-9.6 10.71 133.8 14-14 --I 18 SS 10-10.6 5.90 131.0 11 -xl -19 SS 11-10.5 9.38 131.3 13-13 --xl 20 SS 8-12.9 5.12 124.4 15 -xl -21 SS 9-13.8 5.06 122.7 10-13 --xl 22 SS 8-13.4 5.32 123.7 14 23 SS 12-13.4 6.23 123.7 17 -ZI 24 SS 12-15.7 5.12 118.3 15-15 -C>I -25 SS 10-20.3 4.07 108.8 11-13 -xl -26 SS 8-20.1 3.93 106.9 11 -;;; 127 -;;; SS 8-13.8 4.53 117.7 8-8 40 45 50 68.0 519.2 -;;; 128 SS 10* 17.4 3.01 114.6 -;;; 50/6" -;;; -/ 29 SS --70 72.5 514.7 -;;; -;;; X 30 SS 25-7.6 14.57 113.8 --34-42 -;;; 131 -;;; SS 21-11. 1 4.5* ..

  • 129.6 / 31-36 75 78.0 509.2 -IX 132 SS 37* 10.7 130.7 50/5" -80 RIG NO. 315 DIVISion hnes bct'.-.een del}QSlls represent appfO"una tc buumt[lries beh'.een soillypes in*Sllu tile transition may be gradual DATE COMPLETED

_-,8'..-1.'.4 .'.-.::08,,-_ JOB L-72,07D WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M .. __ " 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-22: (ll, Pl, PI) = 31,12,19 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 15 % Silt = 50 % Clay = 34 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional Cobbles, moist (Cl) Boulder Zone 69.5 to 72.5' Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, lillie sancl, moist (Cl-Ml) Page 2 of 3 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lund

  • LLC BORING ;..1-.=2,-=0 __ _ DATE STARTED ___ 8'---1.:.:2:...-0:::8'----_ DATE COMPLETED _-,8,---1;..4;..-",0",8_ JOB L-72,070 ELEVATIONS WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5::8:.:.7.:.:.2=--___ _ V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' END OF BORING 487.2 'V AT END OF BORING __ ----'M",u:::d"-'.:R::o:.:.ta::.:r.!.y __ W=as ... ___ >< '"

to 0 SAMPLE ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) N WC Qu Y DRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Z U f-.'-'':= --j NO. TYPE __ -"Xl 33 % Gravel = ° _ SS 43-12.0 127.3 % Sand = 27 50/4" % Silt and Clay = 73 --Xl 34 SS 44-85-50/4" /'11 SS 9-8-9 --XI36 90-SS 7-8-11 = Xl SS 8-12-13 --IXI 38 95-'" SS 8-12-13 -*:<1'11 SS 26-27-15 -12.1 13.2 15.1 2.55 18.0 3.21 16.0 2.48 16.2 4.0' 17.3 3.0' 12.1 13.9 2.0 86.0 501.2 87.0 500.2 119.7 gray clayey SILT, little sand, moist Firm gray clayey SAND, saturated (SC) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasiona l silt seams, moist (CL-ML) Dense gray fine to medium SAND, saturated (SP) Very tough gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) _---l'l..l.JL4'IX --'1 40 SS 11.9 2.0' 5 100 w In W [-0 (J) '4 ---Cl 105-" " ----110----115----End of Boring at 100.0'

  • Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer. Diedrich D-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer R ,_ DIVISion hnes between deposits represent DRILL RIG NO. 315 <'lpprOXnllale boundaries bel\'.'een salt types in-sllu, the transition be gradual Page 3 of 3 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power ________________

_ E-< '" '" "-Z H '" "-!3 Ul " 3 '" "' '" Ul H '" i;l , " CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-21 .:...::'-'----DATE START E D _-'8'--".::18::.":0°8"---_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SUR FACE _--'5,,8,,7.:.:.1'---___ _ END OF BORING _-=4,,8,,7.:.:,1'---___ _ E-< '-'0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. NO, TYPE h IX 1 SS 6--... 8-9 3.0 584.1 o -,> IX 2 SS 4-f-' 7-10 5.5 581.6 5 -,'.'. xl -:< 3 SS 4-5-9 , -, . -:'"-XII 4 SS 10-,-.". 13-15 10 ..... -" , -:' , .. , -.. ", . -' X_ SS 5 8-,-. >: 13-14 15 -' -. .. -. -: , -, 'IX. 6 SS 11--' 13-13 20 -;:' 22.0 565.1 -:,' X. -'. 7 SS 10--15-12 25 -. 27.0 560.1 ... -.. -"0' X 8 SS 6--8-11 30 --, 32.0 555.1 --xl 9 SS 16-12.7 5.41 122.7 21 --35 38.0 549.1 --i 10 SS 36-12.2 4.5+' 50/4" 40 ,. DIVISion lines bel' .. een depoSits represent appro)[unate boundaries beh°.'een S!)III}PCS. in-sllll, the tranSItion may be gradual DRILL RIG NO. 315 DATE COMPLETED 8"18"08 ----'-'--'-------- JOB L"72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' \l AT END OF BORING ___ --'-R"'oc:ta.:::r"'y_W'-'-=a-=-sh"---__ _ l' 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTION S Firm brown and gray clayey SAND and GRAVEL, damp (SC-GC) Firm brown and gray SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) \S-2: % Gravel = 1 I % Sand = 95 % Silt and Clav 4 S-5: % Gravel = 24 % Sand = 72 % Silt and Clay = 4 Firm gray SAND, some gravel, occasional Cobbles, saturated (SP) Firm gray SAND, saturated (SP) Firm gray silty fine to medium SAND, saturated (SM) S-9: (LL, PL, PI) = 28, 14, 14 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 8 % Silt = 59 % Clay = 32 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, trace sand, trace gravel, moist (CL) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel. occasional silt searns, damp ICL-IVILl _ --' rage 1 of 3 Co OJ OJ '" z H OJ ;;! '" !3 (f) '" ° .., W '" W u ::i! Co (f) H 0 o " U 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 PRO,IECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING ,-1-=2-,-1 __ _ DATE STARTED _-,8,--1.:.:8,--",08,,--_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5.,.8.:.7'-',1 _____ _ END OF BORI NG _--=4:::8,,7.:.,1'--___ _ Co "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV, NO. TYPE -42,0 545.1 -V -xl 11 SS 16-13,0 4.0' 124.7 25 --- -Xl 12 SS 15-9.7 9.22 133.5 34 -52,0 535.1 -13 SS 26-9,9 3.5' 50/3" --58,0 529,1 IX. 14 SS 17-29 5011" .. .. IX* 15 ss 27--:: 24-24 .-.......::: 68.0 519.1 --'" IX 16 SS 14-14,5 7,73 121.1 -; 17-20 -/: ---xl 17 SS 14-15.7 2,5' 118,3 23 --? -? -rt1lxl 18 5S 16-13,3 6.23 124.0 16*18 ......J..1LI __ , .. DRILL RIG NO, 315 01'/'510n hnes bel .. cen depoSits represent approxllna!C bOllildarics bel\".ecn sOlllypes. In-situ. tile tranSition be gradual DATE COMPLETED 8-18-08 ---'-'-'-'- JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' '\! AT END OF BORING ___ __ _ ... 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS very tougn to hard gray very silty GLAY, lillie sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, damp (CL-Ml) S-11 : (ll, Pl, PI) = 23, 12, 11 % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 20 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 24 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Dense to very dense gray SAND and GRAVEL, occasional Cobbles and Boulders, saturated (SP-GP) Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-17: (ll, Pl, PI) = 25,12,13 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 19 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 27 ----Page 2 of 3 ,... '" '" u. z H '" i;! u. !3 Ul 3 0 .., '" "' '" U c' Ul H Cl " 00 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORI NG .:.1--=2:..:1'----- __ _ DATE STARTED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-.::0:.8_ ELEVATIONS ___ _ END OF BORING _--=4 .. ___ _ ,... 00 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. '" NO. .., TYPE 80 ---IX_ -19 SS 10-13.4 4.5+" 21 85 -87.0 500.1 --IX 20 SS 11-17.5 3.5' 26 90 ---95 -!X 21 SS 15-13.2 4.5+* 25 ---100 -10122 SS 20-10.3 4.5+" 29-37 ----105 -----110 -- - --115 -----120 " DRILL RIG NO. 315 D,VISion lines bell.cen deposits represent approxllnatc boumlMlcs beh':een 5011 types. in-situ. the IranSI\lon may be gractl1at Ii &--131 DATE COMPLETED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-..:::0.::8_ JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5.5 ' \l AT END OF BORING ___ ---'R"'o"'t.::a:Jry'--W=a":'s"h __ _ T 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tOUgll to Ilard gray silty CLAY, liltle sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasiona l silt seams, moist (Cl-Ml) End of Boring at 100.0' . Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrome ter. Diedrich 0-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer Page 3 of 3 Boring I 1-20 1-21 EXYWIT Z5701-1 BORING LOCATION ZION .NUCLEARPo\¥ER PLANT ISFSI SITE #1 *. ,""'. 587.2 587.1 N DRAWN BY: TRP TESTING SERVICE CORPORA nON CHECKED BY: 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE . . * . (L .mJ CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 JOB NO.: L-72,070 1 OF 1 DATE: October 2008 ProjectslDeliverables1979802 _ crosshole.doc GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ZION, ILLINOIS Preparedfor: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION Carol Stream, illinois Prepared by: GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. St. Louis, Missouri Geotechnology, Inc. Report No. 0979802.851S September 15,2008 GEO! ECHNOlOGY, INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SAINT LOUIS* COLLINSVILLE' KANSAS CITY September 15,2007 Mr. Darin Delaney Testing Service Corporation 457 East Gundersen Drive Carol Stream, lllinois 60188

Reference:

Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois

Dear Mr. Delaney:

0979802.85IS Presented herein are the results of the crosshole seismic test for the referenced site. This work was conducted in general accordance with proposal P14676.00.85IS dated July 31, 2008. Presented in this report is a description of the geophysical method and data plots. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (314) 997-7440. Very truly yours, GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Glen 1. Adams Senior Geophysicist GLAlDWL:gla/sjc Copies Submitted: (3) @prifllf1don recyded paper Dougl . Lambert, P.G. Senior Project Manager-Geophysics 11816LACKLAND ROAD. SUITE 150' SAINT LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146

  • 314/997-7440
  • FAX: 314/997-2067 GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0979802.85IS 1.0 IN1RODUCTION

.................................................. ............... ...................... .................... .. I 1.1 Site Description ....................... ..................... ........... .......................... .................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................. ................................. ........................................ . 1 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METI:lODOLOGY ................... ........................................................... 1 3.0 RESULTS ............................................................... ........................ : .................................. 1 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location and Topography ....................... ..................... ............................. ............................. . 1 Plan of Site and Boring Locations ............................... ..................... ........... ................................... 2 Relative Borehole Locations ..................................... ............ ............. .............................. ............. .3 Shear (S) Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus vs. Depth ........................................................ ...... .4 Compressional (P) Wave Velocity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus vs. Depth ............... 5 Summary Table -Crosshole Results .................. ......................... ............... ............... ..................... 6 Source Boring Deviation ......... ............................................. ................................................. ......... 7 Geophone Boring I Deviation ................................. ................. ................................. .............. ...... 8 Geophone Boring 2 Deviation ............................ .................. ............... ............... .............. .......... .... 9 APPENDIX Limitations of Report ......... .................................... .......................... .................................. ............ A GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

0979802.851S 1.1 Site Description. The site consists of an existing nuclear power plant near Zion, illinois. A site location map is presented on Plate 1. The crosshole borings were located approximately 900 feet soufu of fue switch yard within the plant perimeter fence, as shown on the site plan on Plate 2. 1.2 Scope of Work. The scope of work included mobilizing geophysical equipment and personnel to the site, conducting a crosshole seismic test, and processing/interpreting the data. The seismic data were processed, and shear and compressional wave velocities were calculated to detennine dynamic soil properties. The seismic data were plotted and the results are presented in this report. Engineering analysis or reco=endations based on this data are outside our scope of work. 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY The crosshole seismic testing method involves generating compressional (P) and shear (S) wave seismic energy at periodic depth intervals within a borehole and measuring the seismic wave travel-times at geophones situated at the source depth between two adjacent boreholes (per ASTM Standard D4428). The seismic wave arrivals at the geophones are transmitted through cables to the seismograph for digital recording. The data are interpreted by analyzing the differences in elapsed travel-time from the source to geophones. P-and S-wave velocities can be calculated for each depfu interval by analyzing the travel-time data. The distance between boreholes may vary wifu depth; fuerefore borehole deviation logging is conducted to adjust fue borehole separation distance wifu depfu for the velocity calculations. 3.0 RESULTS Crosshole seismic testing was conducted using a source boring and two adjacent receiver (geophone)

borings, indicated as Borings 1-20 (source),

1-20A (Geophone 1), and I-20B (Geophone 2), respectively, as shown on Plate 3. Crosshole data were recorded on 5-foot intervals throughout the depfu of fue borings. Due to a physical limitation of the crosshole equipment, data could only be collected to a depfu of 97 -feet from the surface. The borings were cased to ========================c -!!! Testing Service Corporation September 15, 2008 Page 2 0979802.851S approximately 99-feet and the downhole equipment requires approximately 2-feet from the bottom of the casing to collect data. Seismic velocities calculated between the source boring and the two geophone borings are presented on Plates 4 and 5. A table of all tabulated values and velocities is presented on Plate 6. Plates 7 through 9 are plots of the deviation from vertical for the three borings used for the crosshole test. Due to the inherent noise in the earth, and lateral variations in soil velocities between the test borings, some variations in velocities were calculated between the two receiver holes. An average velocity is plotted on the crosshole data plots that allows a smoother fit to the data. Densities used for the moduli calculations were based on lab values provided by the client as wet uoit weights. @ Ill/nrad (In I,cycled paper NOTES Plan adapted from a 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. map for Zion, illinois Quadrangle, last revised In 1993. 1 INC. ENGINEERING NlD ENVIRONfwENTAlSERVICES ST. LOUIS* COUlNSV1lJ.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois PLATE 1 NOTES --. "

  • 1.:20 (SOURpe) : (GEQPH9NJ:! 1} 1-208 (GEOPHONE Z) 1. Plan adapted from an aerial photograph courtesy of Google Earth. LEGEND
  • Boring Location

/ I I ,.. V ., / t ' o 300 --600 ! SCALE IN FEET PLATE 2 10 8 6 4 2 *2 -4 .fl. *10 1_-------19.9811-------** .. 10.5 II 2 4 6 SOURCE 9.48ft 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 GEOPHONE1 GEOPHONE2 ---------- INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SERVICES ST. LOUIS* COLlJNSVIUE. CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion. Illinois PLATE 3 Shear Wave Velocity (!psi 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 0.0 5.0 ---,.1>>- 10.0 .. +tJ"-:--* ---:-----i---- 15.0 20.0 25.0 ---.... ____ . __ 4-____ I-___ ___ _ 30.0 I 1 I I I I 35.0 _ 40.0 5. 450 J:

  • is.. SO.O a 55.0 60.0 ---.... ----l-------at-------.... ----+----1-... t----... ----65.0 I I I I I I 70.0 75.0 ---,----{-----:----{-.o-:----,----80.0 ._-85.0 90.0 95.0 -- ---:------------+ ----1-----it'"" ----4 ----I.VS(S-Gl) .VS(S-G2) DVS eAVERAGEVS I Soil DescripUoo Sand SiR Clay 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 .c . 15. so.o 55.0 SO.O 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 Shear Modulus (Ksil . 20 40 60 80 __

+-:-------l-------+ -------


1--------4" -----+-------, , ,


:--------.. ---i --------------[--------{--


.+--------------:-------l---+---+-------


:-----

.. ------7 --------_____ ___ , , ,


:---------.----------


:-----+l-------+ --------------!--------!$ -----+-------INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl..

SBMCES ST. LOUIS* COWNsvtL1.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois COMPRESSION (P) Waw Velocity (fps) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0.0 I I 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 . ii 50.0 2l 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 I I I I ----,-----,------r-----T------4i-ef-----I ______ L.. _____ .L ____ _ I I I I I I I I


.,------r------1" ---------C .. 1-&:'--.-----:------+ ----------+

_____ _____ ______ I J I I -----.. --+--D---I I I I -----1'.----r------1" -----


1 ----3-:---.-:------i-----------{-


ofo------{------.... :1---++ -----

... ---_____ l _____ J ______ L _____ L [ .VP(S-G1) -.W(5-G2) ow .AVERAGEW I Soil Descr1ption Sand Silt Clay Posslon's Ratio and Young's Modulus (193 ksl) 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.0 +1--I--!---+---:- "1 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 ----r -----+ -----+\------:------.:=---r -----+--------.. ----__ :1 __ L._ ----+ ------I -+ __ -_1_ ----I I I I _____ L._= ___ + _____ -I ___ 1 I I I --------T ------1------I" ---g 35.0 ,5 40.0 ! 45.0 CD 50.0 :g 55.0 60.0 m 65.0 70.0 ---------t ------t -----*,-----75.0 .... 60:0 .... ---85.0 -----t-i:'!---+ ----------+-----I I I I 90.0 -----I:::-----T-----'-----.,--+--95.0 . -----I Poisson's Ratio I

  • Y ClUng's Modulus INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONM:NTALSERVICES sr. LoutS* COlUNSVlUE*

KANSAS arv Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois DEPfH (FT) SHEAR VELOCITY P-WAVE VELOCITY UNIT WEIGHT SHEAR MODULUS POISSON RATIO YOUNG'S MODULUS (AVERAGE. FTfSEC) (AVERAGE FT/SEC) (LBICU FT) (KSI) (KSI) 5 455 836 128 575 029 1483 10 752 1865 128 1573 040 44.13 15 802 1890 128 1788 039 4971 20 807 1590 128 1798 033 4771 25 866 1609 128 20.84 030 54.01 30 1246 2030 130 43.81 020 104.91 35 1159 2379 109 31.75 034 85.38 40 1371 2921 120 4895 036 13302 45 1420 4263 131 5736 044 164.92 50 1371 2970 124 5059 036 138.06 55 1272 3360 124 43.52 0.42 123.29 60 1184 3230 118 3590 042 102.12 65 1066 2839 107 26.39 0.42 74.85 70 1181 2806 115 3476 039 9686 75 1390 2890 114 4776 035 12896 80 1528 4208 131 66.37 0.42 169.04 85 1302 3073 127 46.70 0.39 129.88 90 1193 3963 115 35.54 045 10306 95 1304 5448 115 4246 047 12481 97 1279 5200 122 43.34 047 12723 Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy: eM Dais; 011-15-08 Dais; 1 Iisio 8 .GEOTECHNOLOGY'N C. ENGINEERING AND ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVIU.E. KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois SUMMARY TABLE

  • CROSSHOLE RESULTS I PLATE 6 -----

--* n --nn e-..... Cl .!: .... .t 0 -:: .0 *2 0 1 0 20 30 40 5 0 z n _n OV . -Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck"d By: Ct.t App'vd .... /g." Date: rlm'R ST. LOUIS. COUJNSVILlE* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ctnIID"" ..... n, Ilun PLATE 7

  • t , "'" * ..... II: ..... :E :; 0 . I 1:: -.0 -4 .0 0 -1.0 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 0 Z
  • n "n * '" Easting (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy:6'U App'Vd Date:'}1dO;>

-. AND sr. LOUIS* COWNSVIUE* KANSASQTY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ---.j ::.::;;_ ...... ,IIUN PLATE 8 An '>" 'In n iE' -CD .e = 1::: 0 0 -4 0 .0 -;; .0 -1 0 00 1 0 20 30 40 50 z . " '>" In A " Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'd By:(,'Z-? . App'vd Date: I Date: "II<!"" I I ... ",. IT INC. ENGiNEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVILLE* KA.NSAS arv Zion Nuclear PoWer Plant Zion, illinois 2 .. ,llun PLATE 9 APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS OF REPORT GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES LIMITATIONS OF REPORT 1. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the owner, architect, and engineer for evaluating the project as it relates to the technical aspects discussed herein. It can be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions included in this report. Unless other contractual agreements were made, the services described in this report were carried out in accordance with the Terms for Geotechnology's Services which were attached to the proposal.

2. Geotechnology endeavored to perform the crosshole seismic geophysical survey in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. The findings and conclusions stated herein must be considered not as scientific certainties, but rather as professional opinions concerning the significance of the limited data gathered during the course of the survey. No warranty, express or implied, is made. 3. The geophysical analyses and conclusions contained in this report are based on the site conditions, project layout, sampling
interval, geophysical data, and interpretive procedures described herein. Geotechnology can make no interpretation of underground conditions beyond the test location.

Geophysical exploration methods are indirect and potentially influenced by a variety of natural or man-made conditions. The resulting interpretations are based on the quality of the recorded data as limited by site conditions Revised 03/09/04 Stdparl9798crosshole .doc TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: PROJECT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago,IL ISFSI Project Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion,IL Carol Stream, 111inois SOIL TEST DATA LOCATION BORING NUMBER 1-20 1-20 SAMPLE NUMBER 2 7 DEPTH IN FEET 3.5 -5.0 16.0 -17.5 HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SP SP GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION GRADATION -PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % 100 100 GRADATION -PASSING 3/B" SIEVE % 95 99 GRADATION -PASSING # 4 SIEVE % 92 95 GRADATION -PASSING # 10 SIEVE % BB 91 GRADATION -PASSING # 40 SIEVE % 79 71 GRADATION -PASSING # 100 SIEVE % 14 B GRADATION -PASSING # 200 SIEVE % 6 4 SAND AND GRAVEL % 94 96 SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED % 6 4 CLAY % <<0.002 MM) LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH 9.26 SOLUBLE CHLORIDES <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % 1-20 12 2B.5 -30.0 CL 100 99 97 95 B5 77 73 27 52 21 22 11 11 11.0 129.9 TSC Job No. L -72,070 September 9, 2008 1-20 1-20 22 32 53.5 -55.0 7B.5 -BO.O CL CL 100 99 99 97 100 92 9B BB BB B4 73 16 27 50 73 34 31 17 12 10 19 7 13.4 10.7 123.7 130.7 TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago,IL PROJECT: ISFSI Project LOCATION BORING NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH IN FEET Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion,IL HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (TSF) GRADA nON -PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING 3/8" SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 4 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 10 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 40 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 100 SIEVE % GRADATION -PASSING # 200 SIEVE % SAND AND GRAVEL% SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED% CLAY % <<0.002 MMl LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH SOLUBLE CHLORIDES Carol Stream, Illinois SOIL TEST DATA 1-21 1-21 2 5 SP SP 86 86 100 79 99 76 99 71 96 62 9 7 4 4 96 96 4 4 9.11 <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % NP -Not Possible 1-21 9 CL 5.41 100 99 98 95 92 91 9 59 32 28 14 14 12.7 122.7 TSC Job No. L -72,070 September 9, 2008 1-21 11 CL NP 100 98 95 93 85 79 76 25 51 24 23 12 11 13.0 1-21 17 CL NP 100 98 97 96 89 83 78 22 51 27 25 12 113 15.7 124.7 118.3 oc z w "i 6 '" u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 41/23/83 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I I I I I I 90 ----. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 \ \ 10 , \ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 8 86 (6% Com ined) 3/8 95 #4 92 #10 88 # 40 79 # 100 14 # 200 6 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 "4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100 140200 100 I I , T I I I I I "'-I'---< 90 " 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 \ , 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER S I I GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY COBBLES I coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, Irace sill, clay and gravel Sample: 7 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 91 (4% Com ined) 3/8 99 #4 95 #10 91 #40 71 # 100 8 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-<U SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 " " z w '3 6 00 l,J.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I T I I I I t-90 .f'--80 70 60 " t 50 1\ "\ 40 30 20 'I'-.. 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL I SAND J SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine Icoarse medium fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel Sample: 12 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 24 52 21 3/8 99 #4 97 #10 95 #40 85 # 100 77 # 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-ZU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I * , f-l, I ----90 80 "---* \ 70 60 \ 50 40 " 1\ 30 "'---20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 22 2 100 (Cll 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 15 50 34 3/8 99 #4 99 #10 97 #40 92 # 100 88 # 200 84 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 ,-.u SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER .6 4 3 21.5 1 3/41/23/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I I I I I I I ,'-.., "'-90 " 80 \ 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Borinq: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silly CLAY, some sand (Cl) Sample: 32 2 100 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 0 27 (73% Corr bined) 3/8 100 #4 100 #10 100 # 40 98 # 100 88 # 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 13/4112 83 4 6 810141620 3040 50 70100140200 100 I I . I I 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 '\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 95 (4% Com ined) 3/8 100 #4 99 #10 99 # 40 96 # 100 9 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 5 1 314 112 318 3 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I \ I I I I I I I 90 I-80 ."" .1"----..... 70 60 II 50 40 30 20 10 1\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER S GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION BorinQ: 1-21 3 inch 100 Light brown SAND, some gravel, Irace sill Sample: 5 2 100 and clay (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 86 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 86 24 72 (4% Com ined) 3/8 79 #4 76 #10 71 #40 62 # 100 7 # 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 21.5 1 3/41/2 83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I I I I I r--.. 90 r-.--.. "\ 80 * \ 70 \ 60 50 40 1\ \ 30 "-20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER S GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse 1 fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, trace sand and gravel Sample: 9 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SIL T %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 8 59 32 3/8 100 #4 99 #10 98 #40 95 # 100 92 # 200 91 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-[1 SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 1141123/83 4 6 810141620 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I * 'i--I I I I I 90 .1'--80 "'----70 60 \ 50 I' "\ 40 30 .. 20 ". 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR CLAY COBBLES I coarse fine Icoarse medium I fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 11 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 20 51 24 3/8 98 #4 95 #10 93 -# 40 85 # 100 79 # 200 76 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-LI SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1123/83 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I . "l-I I I I I 90 1"1"-80 70 ... 60 '\ 50 40 " f\ 30 '. 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 17 2 100 (eL) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 19 51 27 3/8 98 #4 97 #10 96 #40 89 # 100 83 # 200 78 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-'" SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563

  • Phone (630) 778-1200
  • Fax (630) 778-1233 September 03, 2008 Mr. Darin Delaney TESTING SERVICE CORP. 360 So, Main Place Carol Stream, IL 60188 Project lD: 72070 First Environmental File ID: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008

Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:

The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on file for future reference. Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002045: effective 05/14/08 through 02/28/09. I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional informati on, please contact me at (630) 778-1200. Project Page lof4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shorc Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phonc (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Case NalTative TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 First Environmental File JD: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008 I Ftagl Descriplion I Ftag I Descriplion < Analyle not detected at or above the repotting limit. L+ LeS recovery olltside controllilllil s; high biilS. D Analytc detected in associated method blank. L-LeS recovery outside controllimils; low bias. C Identification confillned by GC/MS. M MS recovery outside conlrollimil s; LeS acceptable. D Surrogates diluted out; recovery not available. M+ MS recovery olltside conlrollimit s high bias; LeS acceptabl

e. E Estimated result; concentration exceeds calibrJlion range. M-MS recovery olltside control limits low bias; LeS acceptable

. F Field measurement. N Analyte is 110t pmt of aliI' NELAC accreditation . G Surrogate recovcry outside control limits; matrix effect. 1-1 Analysis or extraction holding time exceedcd. Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range. K RPD outside control limits. Routine Reporting Limit (Lowest amount that can be RL detected when routine weights/volulllcs are used without dilution.) NO Analyte was not detectcd using a library search routine; No calibration standard was rumlyzcd. P Chemical preselvation pH adjusted in lab. Q 'lllC analyte was dctennined by a GC/MS dattlbase search. S T Analyte was sub-contracted to another laboratory for analysis. Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0_6°C \V Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix. All quality control criteria, as outlined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the following analytical report. Sample Batch Comments: Sample acceptance criteria were met. Page 20f4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditntionll [00292 1600 Shore Rand* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Clicnt: Analytical Report TESTfNG SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 Salll pie ID: 1-20 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-00 I Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH@25°C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08128/08 13:30 pH @ 25°C, I: I 0 Result Method: 4500CL,C < 50 Method: 4500S04,E < 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.26 Date Collected: 08/27/08 Tillie Collected: 10:00 Date Received: Date Reported: R.L. Units 50 mg/kg ISO mg/kg Units 08/27/08 09/03/08 Flags Page 30f4 First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200* Fax (630) 778-1233 Client: Analytical Report TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 SampleID: 1-21 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-00 2 Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH @25°C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08/28/08 13 :30 pH @ 25°C, I: 1 0 Resnlt Method: 4500CL,C < 50 Method: 4500S04,E < 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.11 Date Collected: Time Collected: Date Received: Date Reported: R.L. Units 50 mglkg 150 mglkg Units 08/27/08 10:00 08/27/08 09103/08 Flags Page 4of4 .. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. First Environmental Laboratories 1600 Shore Road, Suite D Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail: firstinfo@firstenv.com !EPA Certification

  1. 100292 Project 1.0.: 12010 P.O.#.: Matrix Codes: S = Soil W=Water 0= Other DatefIime Taken Sample Description

FOR LAB USE ONLY: r f Cooler Temperature

Yes_ N/ I) s: ' QC Received within 6 hrs. of co ction: __ _ Ice Present: Yes_ No CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pagc __ of __ pgs Name: Streel Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: e-mail: Send Report To:... Via: Fax 0 cornall 0 Sampled By: ,I I 1/1 I hi 7 Analyses Matrix Comments Lab LD. B-] 5 -------------_ .. --Sample Refrigerated

Yes_ No_ Containers Received Preserved: 0 No Refrigerator Temperature:

___ 'C 5035 Vials Frozen: Yes_ No_ Freezer Temperature: ___ 'C Notes and Special Instructions: ______________ _______________ _______________________ _ Relinquished By: r j ), .A? DatefJlme Q-2.t-6:':1 <? z.' 3 ., Received By: I -j..----0 \, ../ DalefJlme v { v 'I II v '-" ( Relinquished By: DatefIime Received By: r Date!Time ___ 1 ________ _ Rc\'.-'lOIl}}