ML15188A146

Dead River Watershed - Based Plan 2008, Part 20 of 25

ML15188A146
Person / Time
Site:	Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	09/30/2008
From:	Lake County Stormwater Management Commission
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML15188A105	List: ML15188A102 ML15188A103 ML15188A111 ML15188A112 ML15188A116 ML15188A117 ML15188A119 ML15188A121 ML15188A123 ML15188A124 ML15188A125 ML15188A126 ML15188A127 ML15188A134 ML15188A136 ML15188A137 ML15188A138 ML15188A139 ML15188A140 ML15188A141 ML15188A142 ML15188A143 ML15188A145 ML15188A146 ML15188A147 ML15188A148 ML15188A149 ML15188A150 ML15188A151 ML15188A152 ML15188A153 ML15188A185 ML15188A186 ML15188A187 ML15188A190 ZS-2013-0185, Submittal of Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ZS-2015-0084, Map - Surgical Geology of Zion Quadrangle
References
ZS-2015-0084
Download: ML15188A146 (47)

Text

K-1 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading estimates USEPA watershed-based plan element #2:

water quality improvement expected from implementing plan recommendations (also see Chapter 6)

This appendix includes a variety of tables containing information pertaining to watershed pollutant loading and reduction estimates.

Table K1 presents non-point source pollutant loading estimates by subbasin for 12 common pollutants. Tabel K2 presents pollutant loading assumptions by land use category, and Table K3 presents the assumed land use category used for estimating pollutant loading for the land use categories provided by each municipality. The relative contribution of each of the 12 pollutants prese nted in Table K1 is displayed on the maps in Appendix M.

Tables K4 through K9 present the estimated pollutant load / impairment reductions expected for implementing the recommendations in the action plan of Chapter 5. Pollutant and impairment reduction projections are best estimates and/or ranges of impairment reduction that can be achieved for recommended actions for the quantities (e.g., acres, linear feet of stream) indicated. Impairment reduction estimates, whether indicated as quantities, as ranges of percentages, or as an estimated ability to meet reduction targets, are based on a variety of studies examining the potential effectiveness of different actions and best management practices. Results from the various studies are included in Tables K10 to K18.

Impairment reduction targets are indicated in Tables K4 through K9 in two ways and are based on professional opinion of feasibility.

First, Impairment Reduction Targets indicate the potential reduction of the indicated impairment based on full (100%) implementation of the recommended action. For example, if all of the recommended actions intended to address sediment / Total Suspended Solids were to be fully implemented, then 75% of the sediment /

Total Suspended Solids impairment, or problem, can reasonably be expected to be addressed. In other words, even under the best conditions, the entire sediment / Total Suspended Solids problem could not be addressed because it is likely that there will always be some erosion and runoff of sediment from the urban landscape into the stream. Nonetheless, a 75% reduction in Total Suspended Solids / sediment loading would be a successful achievement for watershed improvement.

Area Improvement Targets indicate the area that can reasonably be expected to be addressed by each of the recommended actions. For example, many of the wetland restoration recommendations have an Area Improvement Target of 75%, indicating that 75% of the wetland can reasonably be expected to be restored to a healthy condition. For wetlands, an improvement of 100% is considered unattainable given the hydrologic and stormwater issues of the watershed.

Impairment Reduction Projections are best estimates and/or ranges of impairment reduction that can be achieved for recommended actions for the quantities (e.g., acres, linear feet of stream) indicated. Impairment reduction estimates, whether indicated as quantities, as ranges of percentages, or as an estimated ability to meet reduction targets, are based on a variety of studies examining the potential effectiveness of different actions and best management practices. improve watershed resources. Where actual f gures in pounds per year (lbs/yr) are shown for Total Suspended Solids / sediment and for phosphorous, these f gures represent expected load reductions for these two constituents. Figures are estimated based on research of the practices and the recommended area to be treated. Where a range of percentages is shown, this range indicates the broadest possible range of effectiveness based on research. Properly installed and implemented practices can be expected to reduce the impairment by a percentage within the range indicated. Where a 1, 2, or 3 is indicated, these numbers represent the potential ability to meet reduction target using a three-point scale where 1 represents 0-33% effective, 2 represents 34-66% effective, and 3 represents 67-100% effective. These rankings are based on both research and professional opinion of the planning team.

K-2 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Table K.1. Dead River Subwatershed Pollutant Loading Subbasin Acres TSS TP COD BOD TDS TN TKN DP Cad Lead Cop Zn (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac 1

137 1.06 945 367 29.90 2208 7.76 7.63 0.23 0.01 0.97 0.20 1.45 2

534 0.70 576 231 22.04 1332 5.68 4.56 0.19 0.00 0.55 0.12 0.87 3

36 0.82 688 266 21.97 1611 5.71 5.68 0.18 0.01 0.69 0.15 1.06 4

171 0.83 666 244 24.03 1278 6.02 5.22 0.22 0.00 0.58 0.12 0.97 5

12 0.28 218 91 4.86 742 1.33 2.03 0.04 0.00 0.24 0.05 0.31 6

114 0.62 447 174 16.08 1012 4.24 3.76 0.15 0.00 0.43 0.09 0.73 7

132 0.51 394 128 12.66 674 4.35 2.96 0.16 0.00 0.25 0.06 0.48 8

246 0.56 435 115 14.94 716 4.40 2.25 0.26 0.01 0.52 0.08 0.51 9

45 0.86 554 228 23.63 1172 6.30 5.00 0.22 0.00 0.55 0.11 1.11 10 252 0.92 804 273 27.39 1613 7.44 5.40 0.31 0.01 0.90 0.16 1.12 11 84 1.00 767 311 29.09 1728 7.63 6.44 0.25 0.01 0.78 0.16 1.35 12 39 0.13 23 16 0.47 249 0.22 0.47 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 13 167 1.04 882 331 32.60 1811 8.39 6.63 0.30 0.01 0.86 0.17 1.32 14 130 0.79 656 243 23.12 1455 6.22 4.92 0.23 0.01 0.73 0.14 1.01 15 87 0.83 696 171 24.21 960 7.09 3.21 0.42 0.01 0.85 0.12 0.79 16 228 0.59 463 175 16.58 1047 4.33 3.60 0.16 0.00 0.46 0.09 0.69 17 90 0.44 340 96 11.21 629 3.21 1.94 0.19 0.01 0.38 0.06 0.39 18 21 0.62 466 106 17.08 615 5.17 1.94 0.33 0.01 0.59 0.08 0.52 19 5

0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 20 193 0.34 210 54 7.49 400 2.31 1.08 0.16 0.00 0.25 0.03 0.24 21 123 0.14 32 20 0.67 271 0.27 0.54 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.05 22 21 0.37 274 114 8.46 776 2.31 2.52 0.07 0.00 0.29 0.06 0.46 23 140 0.20 86 48 5.23 387 1.35 0.81 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.12 24 114 0.27 123 60 6.59 394 1.79 1.21 0.08 0.00 0.10 0.02 0.24 25 249 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 26 82 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 27 92 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 28 205 0.68 531 127 18.83 746 5.64 2.37 0.35 0.01 0.67 0.09 0.61 29 50 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 30 112 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 31 415 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 32 136 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 33 186 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 34 153 0.60 446 163 15.68 951 4.63 3.52 0.18 0.00 0.45 0.09 0.71 35 7

0.20 74 37 2.58 344 0.77 0.90 0.05 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.14 36 97 0.70 503 197 18.97 1087 4.94 4.30 0.17 0.00 0.48 0.10 0.86 37 138 0.28 136 61 3.72 573 1.19 1.43 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.03 0.20 38 174 0.60 425 139 17.78 778 4.98 2.64 0.25 0.01 0.48 0.08 0.62 39 96 0.75 627 212 25.49 953 6.01 4.19 0.25 0.00 0.41 0.09 0.68 40 15 1.04 1221 468 28.19 3212 7.32 9.91 0.12 0.01 1.44 0.30 1.73

K-3 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Table K.1. Dead River Subwatershed Pollutant Loading (continued) 41 141 0.66 447 154 18.10 854 5.06 3.20 0.24 0.01 0.49 0.09 0.73 42 97 0.78 518 212 20.78 1157 5.55 4.57 0.20 0.00 0.51 0.11 0.99 43 121 0.80 614 257 29.66 1330 7.49 4.66 0.26 0.00 0.58 0.12 0.98 44 34 0.70 503 145 19.97 734 5.68 2.90 0.30 0.01 0.56 0.09 0.70 45 19 0.75 474 174 20.20 907 5.59 3.74 0.24 0.01 0.50 0.09 0.87 46 156 0.49 380 148 11.66 995 3.20 3.17 0.12 0.00 0.42 0.08 0.60 47 11 0.33 245 84 8.32 496 2.01 1.83 0.10 0.00 0.16 0.04 0.26 48 63 0.91 705 282 26.26 1579 6.82 5.97 0.22 0.01 0.71 0.15 1.21 49 201 0.51 343 127 13.58 663 3.56 2.79 0.15 0.00 0.26 0.06 0.52 50 98 0.56 346 141 15.43 741 4.04 3.04 0.16 0.00 0.31 0.06 0.64 51 280 0.70 505 205 18.82 1156 5.01 4.47 0.16 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.93 52 99 0.57 410 164 15.61 900 4.19 3.58 0.14 0.00 0.40 0.08 0.74 53 131 0.59 364 151 16.04 801 4.49 3.26 0.16 0.00 0.33 0.07 0.70 54 50 0.62 505 188 17.91 1017 4.56 4.04 0.16 0.00 0.46 0.10 0.76 55 31 0.53 421 176 15.57 1050 4.12 3.62 0.12 0.00 0.45 0.09 0.72 56 439 0.50 428 166 13.61 1068 3.84 3.47 0.12 0.00 0.45 0.09 0.64 57 168 0.87 817 283 26.57 1530 6.43 5.92 0.23 0.01 0.68 0.15 0.98 58 174 0.37 236 102 10.44 598 2.77 2.08 0.10 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.42 59 100 1.00 784 297 28.21 1611 7.32 6.29 0.26 0.01 0.72 0.15 1.23 60 215 0.83 547 204 23.65 943 6.21 4.43 0.25 0.00 0.43 0.09 0.91 61 108 0.65 574 228 18.77 1398 5.15 4.75 0.14 0.00 0.59 0.12 0.89 62 39 0.68 308 129 16.18 613 4.93 3.02 0.20 0.00 0.23 0.05 0.69 63 69 0.99 827 318 28.07 1802 7.25 6.74 0.23 0.01 0.82 0.17 1.32 64 192 0.84 644 264 24.57 1509 6.59 5.41 0.21 0.01 0.65 0.14 1.12 65 197 0.67 436 162 17.71 850 4.89 3.56 0.20 0.00 0.38 0.08 0.73 66 355 0.64 416 170 17.41 935 4.69 3.65 0.17 0.00 0.42 0.09 0.79 67 106 0.43 320 96 10.30 481 3.88 2.30 0.15 0.00 0.20 0.04 0.38 68 123 0.15 36 22 1.25 259 0.43 0.58 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.07 69 209 1.08 1303 508 29.40 3496 7.55 10.78 0.10 0.01 1.54 0.32 1.86 70 97 0.25 128 55 4.33 437 1.21 1.29 0.06 0.00 0.12 0.02 0.21 71 91 0.80 534 221 21.43 1209 5.73 4.85 0.19 0.00 0.55 0.11 1.05 72 263 0.70 529 211 18.71 1236 4.92 4.47 0.17 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.89 73 38 0.91 647 245 30.16 1257 8.04 4.57 0.33 0.01 0.68 0.12 1.07 74 59 0.81 638 157 25.51 837 7.44 2.64 0.44 0.01 0.79 0.11 0.73 75 232 1.05 942 291 34.28 1759 9.40 5.17 0.45 0.01 1.12 0.19 1.15 76 204 0.92 799 209 26.57 1233 7.80 3.99 0.43 0.01 1.00 0.15 0.95 77 60 0.13 20 15 0.40 241 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 Total 7896 44.8 33583 12356 1210 73580 328 258 13.2 0.33 34.0 6.6 51.1 Subbasin Acres TSS TP COD BOD TDS TN TKN DP Cad Lead Cop Zn (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac (lb/yr)/ac

K-4 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Table K.2. Pollutant Loading Assumptions by Land Use Category TSS TP COD BOD TDS TN Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered (lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/Yr)

Commercial 1180 1040 1.3 1.2 589 520 85 75 2830 2500 21 Industrial 1240 1080 1.5 1.3 260 230 50 40 1290 1130 14 Institutional 1320 790 1.4 0.8 320 190 52 31 623 374 11 Transportation 2260 1330 1.8 1.1 881 518 50 30 6060 3565 13 Multi-Family 1320 1050 1.4 1.1 320 260 52 42 623 498 11 Residential 309 154 0.81 0.4 140 71 22 11 436 218 6

Agricultural 307 307 0.36 0.36 55 55 6

6 178.4 178.4 4.8 Vacant 100 40 0.22 0.088 64 26 2

0.9 1210 483 1

Open Space 61 20 0.39 0.13 46 15 1

0.4 724 241 1

• Use Unsewered values for all residential parcels TKN DP Cad Lead Cop Zn Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered Sewered Unsewered (lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr)

(lbs/Ac/

Yr) 18 6.9 6.1 0.69 0.61 0.008 0.0071 1.03 0.909 0.2 0.18 1.6 1.4 12 4

4 0.86 0.75 0.025 0.022 1.58 1.39 0.21 0.18 1.3 1.2 6.5 6.4 3.8 0.61 0.36 0.0037 0.0022 0.367 0.22 0.1 0.061 0.57 0.34 7.7 18 11 0.2 0.1 0.021 0.012 2.67 1.57 0.56 0.33 3.2 1.9 8.6 6.4 5.1 0.61 0.48 0.0037 0.003 0.367 0.294 0.1 0.081 0.57 0.46 3.1 3.2 1.6 0.26 0.13 0.002 0.001 0.234 0.117 0.048 0.024 0.9 0.45 4.8 1.82 1.82 0.17 0.17 0.0003 0.0003 0.005 0.005 0.0088 0.0088 0.138 0.138 0.5 2.2 0.88 0.1 0.05 0.0003 0.0001 0.027 0.011 0.01 0.004 0.1 0.06 0.2 1.3 0.44 0.08 0.03 0.0002 0.0001 0.016 0.0054 0.01 0.002 0.08 0.03

K-5 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N WI landuse types Assumed Type Agriculture Agriculture Forest/ grassland Open Space Multi-family Residential Residential Open Water Open Space Public and Private Open Space Open Space Retail/ Commercial Commercial Single Family Residential Residential Transportation Transportation Wetlands Open Space IL Landuse Types Assumed Type Agricultural Agricultural Forest and Grassland Open Space Government and Institutional Institutional Industrial Industrial Multi Famliy Residential Off ce Commercial Public and Private Open Space Open Space Retail/ Commercial Commercial Single Family Residential Transportation Transportation Utility and Waste Facilities Industrial Water Open Space Wetlands Open Space Table K.3. Land Use Categories Used for Pollution Loading Estimates

K-6 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

1.0.1 Zion Preserve Category 1 and 2 green infrastructure open space areas to connect the North and South units of Illinois Beach State Park, enhance recreational opportunities, and expand and restore important rare habitat.

Decommission and remove the power plant and associated structures. Acreage count includes private / utility owned land within the area. It is assumed that restoration would address the potential pollutant loading hotspots identified as Critical Subbasins #15 and #74.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.0.3 Zion Manage / minimize runoff impacts of commercial land uses along Sheridan Road, particularly at Sheridan and 33rd St and Sheridan and 27th, 28th, and 29th along the stream. Cost estimate assumes 8400 lf of Sheridan Road frontage treated with improved, 10' swales (approximately 2 acres) as a proxy for on-site source control BMPs.

100%

4,620 5

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 2.0.6 Zion Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet /

outlet problems by removing clogging and/

or debris buildup; address algae / nutrient loads and turbidity / sedimentation by naturalizing the basin; remove excess debris.

100%

883 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 2.0.7 Zion Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address turbidity

/ sedimentation by naturalizing the basin; remove excess debris. This is depressional area #54.

100%

1,606 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 2.0.8 Zion Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin; remove excess debris. 100%

1,686 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 2.0.9 Zion Address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

1 3

3 NA 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 2.28.1 Zion Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing pools and riffles. 25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 2.28.2 Zion Restore and manage the channel, native riparian buffers, and ravine woodland system, particularly the reach running through Ophir Park west of Sheridan Road, and Carmel Park east of Sheridan Road. Management practices include controlling invasive species, planting native species, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

4,336 7

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

Table K.4. City of Zion Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates

K-7 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

2.28.3 Zion Stabilize and reduce downcutting of the incised channel through Ophir Park, and install a naturalized riparian buffer.

Cost estimate assumes stabilization of streambanks with Moderate erosion problem.

100%

29,700 14 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 2.28.4 Zion Manage the culvert outflow at the upstream end of the reach for energy dissipation and pollutant removal, possibly with a settling basin or small constructed wetland.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 2.28.5 Zion Stabilize Moderate streambank erosion along the entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which will help reduce the instream silt /

sedimentation load within this reach.

100%

106,920 49 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 2.28.6 Zion Remove debris, tires, and logs using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 2.28.7 Zion Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 2.28.8 Zion Remove concrete debris and remove or repair failed headwall and outfall pipe.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 2.28.9 Zion Stabilize major erosion, bank slumping /

blowout, and headwall failure at upstream end of the reach near the culvert. Use bioengineering stabilization measures if possible, and more structural measures if necessary. Cost estimate reflects stabilization of severe erosion problem.

100%

130 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 2.28.10 Zion Stabilize 4 foot diameter plunge pool erosion below outfall. If feasible use bioengineering measures, though rip rap and structural measures may be necessary.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 2.28.11 Zion Stabilize bank erosion caused by stormwater outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 2.28.12 Zion Inspect and, if necessary, repair five culverts under trail, which may be crushed and/or failing.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.0.3 Zion Preserve approximately 21 acres of wetland and stream corridor open and partially open Category 1 green infrastructure areas and greenways within the headwaters of the 27th St tributary.

Target areas are located (1) southwest of 25th St and Galilee, (2) south of Jethro and 26th Street, (3) west of 26th and Lewis, (4) southeast of 26th and Lewis, (5) northwest of 29th and Lewis.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Table K.4. City of Zion Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-8 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Table K.4. City of Zion Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3a.0.7 Zion Manage the golf course grounds and detention / water features in Shiloh Park, in the northeast corner of the SMU for water quality and habitat benefits, including installation of a 5 foot riparian buffer along shoreline / banks of water features.

100%

1,847 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3a.0.8 Zion FPAI site 20-13 experiences local drainage problems due to runoff from the west. Retrofit David Park and the school property west of the problem area with detention or infiltration practices to reduce runoff rate and volume.

100%

2 NA NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA NA NA 3

1 NA 3a.0.9 Zion Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a minimum 5 ft buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet

/ outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; address turbidity /

sedimentation by naturalizing the basin.

100%

281 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.10 Zion Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3a.0.11 Zion Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a minimum 5 ft surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

241 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.12 Zion Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a minimum 5 ft surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; remove excess debris.

100%

321 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.13 Zion Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a minimum 5 ft surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; retrofit bottom concrete channel.

100%

321 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.14 Zion Plant banks and a minimum 5 ft surrounding buffer with native vegetation; remove excess debris.

100%

562 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.15 Zion Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet

/ outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; address algae /

nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin; remove excess debris.

100%

610 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.16 Zion Stabilize / regrade shoreline and plant banks and a minimum 5 ft surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address turbidity / sedimentation.

100%

642 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3a.0.17 Zion Plant banks and a minimum 5 ft surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address turbidity / sedimentation by naturalizing the basin.

100%

1,124 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA

K-9 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Table K.4. City of Zion Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3a.27.1 Zion Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach within Sharon Park by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning. A wider, partially forested buffer may be appropriate in the lower parts of the reach.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3a.27.2 Zion Address High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, some of which may threaten buried sewer lines.

100%

518,400 216 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.3 Zion Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3a.27.4 Zion Remediate significant erosion and slumping on left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.5 Zion Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3a.27.6 Zion Stabilize significant erosion and exposure of manhole and sewer infrastructure using bioengineering stabilization measures and other hardscape solutions to ensure protection of the infrastructure elements. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.7 Zion Stabilize erosion creating open channel at discharge point using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.8 Zion Remediate significant erosion and slumping on left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 150 lf for cost estimation purposes.

100%

19,440 8

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.9 Zion Stabilize erosion at outfall that is creating an open channel using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.10 Zion Stabilize major erosion, headwall, and outfall pipe failure using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.27.11 Zion Stabilize minor channel erosion using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA

K-10 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Table K.4. City of Zion Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.22.1 Zion Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

1,927 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.22.2 Zion Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA

K-11 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

1.0.3 Beach Park Preserve and restore open and partially open green infrastructure bounded by North Ave, York House Road, Sheridan Road, and residential areas to the north (spanning SMUs #1, #3b, and #3c) for natural resource restoration and management and recreation. Preserving two corridors (19 acres) east of Sheridan Road would connect this piece to the larger Illinois Beach State Park system.

The area also contains storage area #30 and potential storage area #27, which may help reduce flooding in the area of FPAI 20-02 along Coolidge Ave.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0.8 Beach Park Monitor IDOT-recorded flooding location at Sheridan and York House Road for further problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.9 Beach Park Monitor IDOT-recorded flooding locations at Sheridan and Beach Road for further problems. 100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.14 Beach Park Install filtration and infiltration BMPs for existing commercial properties along Sheridan Road. Cost estimate reflects 10' wide swale improvements (as a proxy for lot level / source control BMPs) along 1500 lf of Sheridan Road frontage.

100%

0 0

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 1.0.15 Beach Park Improve any swale and other surface stormwater drainage systems within the developed areas of the western part of this SMU, which is mostly unsewered, and install stormwater filtration and infiltration BMPs. Details reflect 54,000 lf (approximately 12.5 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level

/ source control BMPs on each side of roads within this part of the SMU.

75%

57,915 61 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 1.0.23 Beach Park Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.24 Beach Park Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.27 Beach Park Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 2.0.5 Beach Park Monitor past IDOT-recorded flooding at Sheridan and Wadsworth for further problems and remediate if flooding continues. 100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3a.25.4 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA

K-12 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3a.26.1 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning. A wider, partially forested buffer is appropriate in the lower parts of the reach.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3a.26.2 Beach Park Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing & enhancing pools and riffles.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3a.26.3 Beach Park Address Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which may help reduce the silt and sediment load.

100%

79,200 36 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.26.4 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

2,200 5,280 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3a.26.5 Beach Park Remove chain link fence placed across stream channel.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3a.26.6 Beach Park Remediate significant erosion using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.26.7 Beach Park Investigate and remediate collapsed pedestrian bridge in the stream channel.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.0.2 Beach Park Consider daylighting and restoring as much of the Wilson Avenue Tributary (not inventoried) as possible through the residential areas. Daylighting and restoration should address concerns about the tank cars and transite pipes that are reported to transmit the flow below ground in this location.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.0.3 Beach Park Buffer the Wilson Avenue Tributary from encroachment by preserving open Category 2 green infrastructure areas.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2

2 NA NA 3

3b.0.5 Beach Park Restore and manage the wetlands within the open and partially open Category 1 Green Infrastructure areas just north of Lyons Woods Forest Preserve; reconnect these wetlands to the Lyons Woods system.

75%

1,379 3

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

NA 3

NA NA NA 1

3 NA 3b.0.8 Beach Park FPAI site 20-04, in the Village of Beach Park, experiences sewer backup into homes due to an inadequate drainage system. Investigate whether the remedial measure, a large pipe and ditch installed as part of the Monarch Point development to the north, fixed the problem. If not, remedial action should be taken, which may include working with the open areas identified on the SMU map to relieve drainage issues.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

1 Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-13 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.0.9 Beach Park FPAI site 20-05, in the Village of Beach Park, experiences road, home, and backyard flooding due to inadequate conveyance capacity of the open ditch and culvert, particularly the culvert under Yorkhouse Road. Remedial action may include retrofit / restoration of open green infrastructure areas to help absorb / store flood water.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

1 3b.0.10 Beach Park The area where BL13, BL14, and BL15 come together is in need of a stream restoration plan to remediate the buildup of debris, concrete lined channels, underground culverts and railroad tank cars, yard waste in the stream channel, and other impacts from nearby residential areas. 25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.0.11 Beach Park Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address turbidity /

sedimentation by naturalizing the basin.

100%

642 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.0.13 Beach Park Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup.

100%

402 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.0.14 Beach Park Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

402 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.0.17 Beach Park Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.0.18 Beach Park Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.0.19 Beach Park Plant banks with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; remove excess debris.

100%

522 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.0.20 Beach Park Convert to wet or wetland basin; plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup.

100%

683 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.0.21 Beach Park Plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; remove excess debris.

100%

964 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.12.1 Beach Park Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing and enhancing pools and riffles.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.12.2 Beach Park Address High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which may help reduce the instream silt / sedimentation load.

100%

492,480 205 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-14 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.12.3 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,051 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.12.4 Beach Park Investigate / inspect failed / broken concrete dam along west of Cheney /

North Ave. for impact on stream, and remove impacting dam elements if found be have a negative impact.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.12.5 Beach Park Stabilize typical 1-2 foot erosion on right bank using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

540 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.12.6 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.12.7 Beach Park Stabilize significant erosion and slumping of right bank using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.12.8 Beach Park Remove debris and sediment from culvert under Beach Road.

100%

1 NA NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3b.12.9 Beach Park Remediate erosion of open point discharge channel draining to the creek using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.12.10 Beach Park Remediate erosion of open point discharge channel draining to the creek using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.13.1 Beach Park Manage and restore the wooded ravine along reach BL13. Assumes an area 2500 lf by 150 ft in width for cost estimating purposes.

75%

1,674 4

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

1 3

3 2

1 1

1 1

3b.13.2 Beach Park Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing and enhancing pools and riffles and removing numerous debris jams according to the American Fisheries Society guidelines.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.13.3 Beach Park Address High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which may help reduce the instream silt / sedimentation load.

100%

777,600 324 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-15 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.13.4 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

4,818 8

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.13.5 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

3,300 11,880 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3b.13.6 Beach Park Inspect footbridges and armored /

concrete-lined banks and remediate if found to be negatively impacting the stream.

75%

197 0

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

3b.13.7 Beach Park Restore channel reach near Wilson Avenue by installing pool and riffle structures and stabilizing streambanks.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.13.8 Beach Park Remove concrete debris dumping / fill just upstream of Beach Rd culvert from property / operation at Tewes and Beach.

100%

NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA NA NA 1

1 NA NA 1

3b.13.9 Beach Park Remediate significant erosion and slumping of right bank using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.13.10 Beach Park Inspect and assess fencing across channel and rock wall armoring and remove if found to impair the conveyance of water.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.13.11 Beach Park Remove concrete from channel and restore stream channel by stabilizing streambanks and installing habitat features such as pools and riffles and rootwads. Assumes 150 lf of stream channel needs attention for cost estimation purposes.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.13.12 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.13.13 Beach Park Remove debris and sediment from culvert under Beach Road.

100%

1 NA NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3b.13.14 Beach Park Address failed concrete wall armoring and major erosion behind the armoring by removing the concrete and using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Assumes 100lf of stream channel needs attention for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.13.15 Beach Park Repair or replace broken concrete and corrugated metal pipe culvert and remove debris obstructing flow.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-16 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.13.16 Beach Park Stabilize erosion at and below outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.13.17 Beach Park Repair failed clay outfall pipe and address erosion around outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.14.1 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

803 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.14.2 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

550 330 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3b.14.3 Beach Park Conduct major channel restoration by removing debris and restoring a natural channel to this concrete-lined drainage ditch.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.15.10 Beach Park Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.11 Beach Park Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.12 Beach Park Remove debris at the outfall discharge points.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.17.1 Beach Park Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by enhancing pools and riffles. 25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.17.2 Beach Park Address Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

95,040 43 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.17.3 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,854 6

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.17.4 Beach Park Inspect footbridges and armored /

concrete-lined banks along this reach for impacts on the stream corridor and remediate if necessary.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-17 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.17.5 Beach Park Remove broken concrete slab streambank armoring and restore channel to natural channel condition. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 50 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes. 25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.17.6 Beach Park Restore a minimum 5 foot wide, deep-rooted native plant buffer to the stream edge within the golf course.

100%

964 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.17.7 Beach Park Remove debris at outfall.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.17.8 Beach Park Stabilize significant erosion and bank slumping using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 50 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

6,480 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.17.9 Beach Park Remove debris blocking culvert and repair, remediate, and/or stabilize the exposed culvert.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.17.10 Beach Park Stabilize erosion undermining the culvert, preferably using bioengineering stabilization measures but also using more structural measures if necessary.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.0.9 Beach Park FPAI site 20-02, in the Village of Beach Park, experiences flooding due to inadequate outlets and poor drainage.

There is a backyard drainage ditch between Beach and Howard, Sheridan and Geraghty (depressional storage #49) and extending along Coolidge Rd to the north (depressional storage #50) that are likely part of the cause of flooding.

Investigate whether the new storm sewer along Coolidge Avenue has eliminated flooding in this location. If flooding persists, additionial solutions may include improvement of drainage overland flow paths and installation of additional storm sewer capacity to alleviate the problem.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3c.0.10 Beach Park Monitor past IDOT-recorded flooding locations at Sheridan and Wadsworth, Sheridan and Talmadge / Michigan, and Sheridan and Beach Rd. to determine whether flooding is still occuring at these sites. If so, develop and implement flood mitigation strategies.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3c.0.14 Beach Park Stabilize / regrade shoreline and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

522 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-18 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.0.15 Beach Park Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address algae / nutrient loads and turbidity / sedimentation by naturalizing the basin.

100%

482 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.0.16 Beach Park Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; stabilize /

regrade shoreline and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

241 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.0.18 Beach Park Plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup.

100%

301 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.7.3 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

1,980 4,277 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3c.7.4 Beach Park Assess side slope seeps for restoration potential. Restore if possible.

75%

NA NA NA NA NA 1

NA 3

2 1

1 NA NA NA 3c.7.5 Beach Park Remove massive debris jam approximately 300' downstream of Sheridan Road and stabilize channel.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.8.1 Beach Park Address High streambank erosion along entire reach, some threatening homes and property, using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

518,400 216 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.2 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.8.3 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

2,200 5,280 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3c.8.4 Beach Park Repair broken cement outfall pipe and stabilize surrounding erosion using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Location is approximately 300' upstream of Sheridan Rd.

100%

130 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-19 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.8.5 Beach Park Stabilize streambank erosion across from the sewer / manhole stabilization project along the reach near the Garaghty /

California intersection. Length of problem is unknown; assume 50 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

990 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.6 Beach Park Stabilize minor channel erosion and downcutting of channel outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures and energy dissipation measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.7 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion behind headwall and below outfall preferably using bioengineering stabilization measures but may also require more structural measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.8 Beach Park Stabilize moderate channel erosion and downcutting using bioengineering stabilization measures and, if necessary, check dams.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.9 Beach Park Address major erosion and slumping on left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 50 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

6,480 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.10 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.8.11 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.8.12 Beach Park Monitor sewer manhole, which rises 6 feet above stream elevation, for leakage and infiltration problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3c.8.13 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion and slumping of ravine bank using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.8.14 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.1 Beach Park Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing and enhancing pools and riffles and installing boulders, large rocks, and / or rootwads.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.2 Beach Park Stabilize High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

648,000 270 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-20 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.9.3 Beach Park Restore the native riparian buffer (manage native riparian plant communities within this reach: control invasive species, plant native species, thin shrub layer to allow more understory growth, and manage vegetation such as through prescribed burning.)

100%

4,015 7

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.9.4 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

2,750 8,250 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3c.9.5 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion with slumping on the left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 50 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

6,480 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.9.6 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.7 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.8 Beach Park Remove debris around plastic outfall pipe.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.9 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion on the left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.9.10 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.11 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.9.12 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion and slumping of the left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.10.1 Beach Park Stabilize High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which may help reduce the silt / sediment accumulation within this reach.

100%

207,360 86 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-21 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.10.2 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

1,285 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.10.3 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion and slumping using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.10.4 Beach Park Stabilize erosion around capped outfall pipe using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.11.1 Beach Park Stabilize High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

648,000 270 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.11.2 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

4,015 7

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.11.3 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

2,750 8,250 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3c.11.4 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing culverts.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.11.5 Beach Park Remove debris from outfall channel and assess armoring for impact on stream; if negative impact is found, remove armoring and stabilize with bioengineering approach. 100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.11.6 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion and slumping using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.11.7 Beach Park Repair / remediate erosion below outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.11.8 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-22 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.11.9 Beach Park Stabilize major erosion occurring behind armoring on the left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.11.10 Beach Park Assess wood armoring / retention wall for stability and feasibility of bioengineered approach to bank stabilization. Assumes 100lf of stream channel, both sides for cost estimation purposes.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3c.19.1 Beach Park Stabilize Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

75,240 34 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.19.2 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,051 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.19.3 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

2,090 4,765 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3c.19.4 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.19.5 Beach Park Stabilize significant erosion and slumping on the left bank using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.19.6 Beach Park Stabilize channel erosion and downcutting of discharge channel using bioengineering stabilization measures and check dams or other grade stabilization measures if necessary.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.19.7 Beach Park Stabilize channel erosion and downcutting of discharge channel using bioengineering stabilization measures and check dams if necessary.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.20.1 Beach Park Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing and enhancing pools and riffles.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.20.2 Beach Park Stabilize Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

142,560 65 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-23 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.20.3 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

5,782 10 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.20.4 Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

3,960 17,107 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3c.20.5 Beach Park Stabilize significant erosion and slumping using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.20.6 Beach Park Stabilize significan erosion and attempted stabilization debris around culvert using bioengineering stabilization measures 100%

130 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.20.7 Beach Park Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3c.20.8 Beach Park Stabilize channel erosion and downcutting of discharge channel using bioengineering stabilization measures and check dams if necessary.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.20.9 Beach Park Stabilize erosion around culvert using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.20.10 Beach Park Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.20.11 Beach Park Repair or remediate cracked concrete armoring at outfall.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3c.24.1 Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.24.2 Beach Park Remove debris including tires.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 4.0.1 Beach Park Preserve and restore the ravine within the open Category 1 green infrastructure area between Ganster Road and Sheridan Road, just east of Lyons Woods Forest Preserve. 100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-24 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

4.0.6 Beach Park Expand / enlarge detention basins #28,

1. 75, and #76 to reduce IDOT-recorded flooding locations along Sheridan Road north of Blanchard.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 4.0.9 Beach Park Inspect and remediate inlet / outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; address algae / nutrients by naturalizing the basin; remove excess debris.

100%

522 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 4.05.3 Beach Park Remove debris / bricks in channel.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 4.05.4 Beach Park Stabilize bank erosion using bioengineering stabilization measures.

Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 50 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

990 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K.5. Village of Beach Park Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-25 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Table K6. City of Waukegan Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

1.0.7 Waukegan Preserve and restore the green infrastructure areas in the southwest corner of the SMU, east of the Union Pacific rails and west of industrial land uses (Midwest Generation, North Shore Sanitary District, and Outboard Marine Corporation). This area has been identified by the City of Waukegan for restoration as the 'Waukegan Moorlands'.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0.10 Waukegan Investigate the wetlands adjacent to the Johns Manville lagoons for restoration and remediation potential and as a possible water quality improvement facility for water runoff from nearby industrial sites. Cost reflects standard wetland restoration and management rather than clean up and remediation.

75%

6,895 14 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

1.1.1 Waukegan Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

1.1.3 Waukegan Restore stream channel and instream habitat by reducing / remediating channelization, possibly through a remeandering and other restoration projects such as installing boulders, large rocks, and / or rootwads.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 1.1.5 Waukegan Inspect and remediate culvert, which is nearly full of water in the inventory photo and may be sediment filled.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.1.6 Waukegan Inspect and remediate culvert, which is nearly full of water in the inventory photo and may be sediment filled.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3b.0.12 Waukegan Address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

0 3

3 NA 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.0.15 Waukegan Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.0.16 Waukegan Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

321 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3b.16.5 Waukegan Stabilize the eroding, 4 foot deep cut channel within the turf grass landscape at the upstream end of BL16, just downstream of the Beach Rd. culvert.

100%

77,760 32 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.16.6 Waukegan Repair or replace the steel Beach Road culvert that is eroding around the edges and beneath, possibly due in part to the additional plastic drain pipe.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA

K-26 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.0.3 Waukegan For Waukegan Airport property, implement the spill prevention and response plan and reduce the use of salt and/or deicers.

Install filtration and infiltration BMPs to capture and treat runoff from airport landscapes, particularly impervious surfaces such as runways and fueling areas, before being discharged to the stream system of Bull Creek.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3c.0.17 Waukegan Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

1,044 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 4.0.5 Waukegan Improve swale and other surface stormwater drainage systems within the developed areas of the SMU, particularly those residential areas off Miraflores and Montesano, with lot level stormwater filtration and infiltration BMPs. Details reflect 28,000 lf (approximately 6.5 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level / source control BMPs on each side of all roads.

75%

30,030 32 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 4.0.7 Waukegan Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 4.0.8 Waukegan Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 4.05.5 Waukegan Stabilize and strengthen the incised discharge channel.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.0.1 Waukegan Preserve the ravine within the 7-acre open Category 1 green infrastructure area between Circle Court and the Amstutz Expressway. 100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 5.0.2 Waukegan Preserve and restore wetland complexes where these resource remain, including those along the entire length of reach BL04 and those adjacent to Lake County Gardens (depressional storage areas #22 and #23). Wetland / depressional area

1. 23, bordered by Pine, Lorraine, Wilson, and the McClory Bike Trail, contains some elements of a decent quality wetland indicative of good restoration potential.

Two additional potential restoration areas are the small park between Butrick and Yeoman and the upstream drainage corridor north of and paralleling Rice St.

75%

12,804 27 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

5.0.3 Waukegan Preserve the wetlands / stream corridor within Category 1 and 2 open green infrastructure areas between Rice and MacArthur, west of Lewis Avenue, and the area between Pine, Wilson, and the McClory bike path.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA NA NA Table K6. City of Waukegan Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-27 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

5.0.4 Waukegan Install filtration BMPs for commercial and institutional uses along Greenwood Avenue and at the York House Rd / Lewis Ave intersection to help reduce pollutant loading in potential pollution hotspot subbasins S13, S14, S43, and S73.

Details reflect 10,000 lf (approximately 2.5 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level / source control BMPs on along the road frontage.

100%

5,500 6

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 5.0.5 Waukegan Install lot level filtration and infiltration BMPs, to help reduce pollutant loading in potential pollution hotspot subbasins S13, S14, S39, S43, and S73. Details reflect 228,000 lf (approximately 52 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements

/ lot level / source control BMPs on each side of all roads.

100%

125,400 137 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 5.0.6 Waukegan Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

1,205 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 5.0.7 Waukegan Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and surrounding buffer with native vegetation; inspect and remediate inlet

/ outlet problems by removing clogging and/or debris buildup; address turbidity /

sedimentation by naturalizing the basin; remove excess debris.

100%

723 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 5.0.8 Waukegan Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

482 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 5.0.9 Waukegan Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; stabilize

/ regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and surrounding buffer with native vegetation.

100%

723 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 5.0.10 Waukegan Retrofit as wet / wetland basin; stabilize

/ regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and plant banks and a surrounding buffer with native vegetation; address algae / nutrient loads and address turbidity / sedimentation by naturalizing the basin. This may reduce pollutant loading within potential pollutant loading hotspot S39.

100%

602 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 5.0.11 Waukegan Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.his may reduce pollutant loading within potential pollutant loading hotspot S14.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 Table K6. City of Waukegan Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-28 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

5.2.1 Waukegan Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

Restoration and management of Bowen Park and the residential areas along Miraflores is important to enhance the habitat quality of this reach.

100%

6,424 11 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

5.2.2 Waukegan Reduce impacts of surrounding golf course and park property such as landscape waste dumping, turf grass stream edges. Filter and infiltrate runoff from parking lots, such as those within Bowen Park, with BMPs. Details reflect installation of lot level BMPs.

100%

2,200 5,280 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

5.2.3 Waukegan Reduce impacts of residential homes along Miraflores: cease yard waste dumping, replace mown turf grass to the edge of the stream with a minimum 10 foot native vegetation buffer, infiltrate runoff discharge from roof or footing drains with rain gardens or rain barrels, and naturalize the stream channel by replacing poured concrete and rip rap with bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,200 5,280 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

5.2.4 Waukegan Gully erosion occurring in the ravines of Bowen Park should be remediated through ravine woodland restoration and management along reach BL02. Assumes 4000 lf of stream reach by 500' width.

Costs reflect woodland restoration; load reduction reflects Moderate erosion stabilization. 100%

911 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.2.5 Waukegan Stabilize erosion around the Sheridan Road culvert and replace the broken stormsewer that is discharging to the opposite streambank.

100%

130 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.2.6 Waukegan Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 5.2.7 Waukegan Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 5.2.8 Waukegan Stabilize typical 2-4 foot bank erosion using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

1,980 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.2.9 Waukegan Stabilize minor erosion of open discharge channel using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K6. City of Waukegan Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-29 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

5.2.10 Waukegan Stabilize significant erosion below outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures. 100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.2.11 Waukegan Stabilize minor channel erosion below concrete lined channel outfall. Consider removing concrete and stabilizing channel with more habitat-appropriate measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.2.12 Waukegan Install energy dissipation measures to address the eroding plunge pool created by discharge from the elevated outfall.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.3.1 Waukegan Restore a 5 foot wide native riparian buffer and replace turf grass lawn edges to native riparian plant communities as is feasible within the golf course.

100%

4,818 8

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

5.3.2 Waukegan Glen Flora Country Club: replace or remediate online detention, armored dams and wiers with more habitat appropriate structures that allow fish passage.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.3.3 Waukegan Stabilize erosion undercutting the concrete-lined channel outfall / dam; if feasible, remove concrete and replace with bioengineered channel stabilization measure.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 5.4.1 Waukegan Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by reducing channelization, such as through a remeandering project.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 5.4.2 Waukegan Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

11,242 19 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

5.4.3 Waukegan Implement the mitigation planfor FPAI site 20-06, in the City of Waukegan, Lake County Gardens subdivision. There also may be opportunities to increase the detention and/or drainage capacity of the drainage system in this area, particularly within the community park to the north.

However, improvement of the wetlands to increase their storage capacity may also be an option.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

1 5.4.4 Waukegan Restore the upper end of this reach, a fairly undefined channel that is choked with cattails, through invasive species removal and management.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 6.0.1 Waukegan Manage and restore the wooded ravine, wetland, and depressional area #3 that lies between the Amstutz and Sheridan Road for storage. Load reduction details reflect impact of restored wetland.

75%

2,758 6

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

Table K6. City of Waukegan Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-30 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

6.0.3 Waukegan Open and partially open Category 1 green infrastructure areas between the waste water treatment plant and the Union Pacific tracks should be restored and integrated into the planned Waukegan Moorlands area to the north. Details reflect natural area restoration.

75%

5,516 12 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

NA NA 1

NA NA NA NA NA 6.0.4 Waukegan Install filtration BMPs for commercial, industrial, and institutional uses in the eastern and southwestern portions of the SMU to help improve water quality in potential pollutant loading hotspot S10, S11, and S75. Details reflect approximately 15,000 lf (approximately 3.5 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level / source control BMPs on along the road frontages of these land uses.

100%

2 0

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 6.0.5 Waukegan This SMU is primarily sewerd but undetained. Install source controls and lot level filtration and infiltration BMPs, including detention basin improvements, which may help address pollutant loading in potential pollutant loading hotspot S10, S11, and S75. Details reflect 96,000 lf (approximately 22 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level /

source control BMPs on each side of all roads.

75%

102,960 108 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA Table K6. City of Waukegan Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-31 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

1.0.2 IDNR Develop and implement habitat restoration and management plans for Illinois Beach State Park, including all wetlands, waterways, beach ridge, dune and swale systems, and T&E species habitat.

75%

304,937 639 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

1 3

3 1

1 NA NA NA 1.0.5 IDNR Restore hydrologic connectivity of Dead River to Lake Michigan and remove those created to carry wastewater to the lake.

Assumes that 4 hydrologic connections need to be restored or removed.

75%

NA NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0.16 IDNR Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.17 IDNR Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices and address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

883 606 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 1.0.18 IDNR Address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

1 3

3 NA 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 1.0.19 IDNR Address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

1 3

3 NA 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 1.0.20 IDNR Address algae / nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

1 3

3 NA 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 1.0.21 IDNR Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.22 IDNR Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.25 IDNR Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 1.0.26 IDNR Inventory detention basin and identify resolutions to any noted functional problems.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 Table K7 Illinois Department of Natural Resources Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates

K-32 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3a.0.6 Lake County Depressional storage area #78, within the Thunderhawk Golf Club Forest Preserve, may be able to be expanded to provide additional storage if needed, and may also be retrofitted / restored to improve runoff quality from the golf course, provided that runoff can be directed into this area, treated, and then discharged to a receiving water body. Costs reflect restoration of this wet / hydric area.

75%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA 3a.0.18 Lake County Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices; address algae /

nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

964 2

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.0.11 Lake County Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices; address algae /

nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

803 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.0.12 Lake County Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices.

100%

1,606 3

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.0.13 Lake County Stabilize / regrade shoreline using bioenginnering practices; address algae /

nutrient loads by naturalizing the basin.

100%

522 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM 1

1 NA NA 1

1 NA NA NA NA 3c.23.1 Lake County Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

5,782 10 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

4.0.3 Lake County Manage and restore the natural resources, including ADID wetland

1. 1831, in the northeastern corner of Lyons Woods Forest Preserve. The southern portion of depressional storage area #28 is within the Forest Preserve boundary and may be used to relieve past IDOT-recorded flooding at Sheridan and York House Road. ADID wetland is approximately 46 acres (4000' by 500' wide) and the total area of Lyons Woods is 264 acres.

75%

52,005 109 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

Table K8. Lake County Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates

K-33 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

1.0.4

Waukegan, IDNR, Lake County Remediate, cap, or otherwise contain contaminated areas, materials, waste piles, waste ponds, etc. to prevent contaminants from becoming mobilized (via air or water) and entering water resources or sensitive natural areas in Illinois Beach State Park.

NA^

NA^

NA^

NA^

NA^

NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^ NA^

1.0.6 Beach

Park, Waukegan Preserve Category 1 open green infrastructure areas including a portion of depressional storage area #17 and the utility corridor that can serve as a green infrastructure connector between Illinois Beach State Park to Lyons Woods Forest Preserve.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA 1.0.11 Zion, Waukegan, IDNR Manage the Lake Michigan shoreline and beaches to minimize beach erosion.

Details reflect 28000 lf of shoreline at an average width of 150 feet.

75%

NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0.12 Zion, Waukegan, IDNR Manage the Lake Michigan shoreline and beaches to minimize E. coli contamination that leads to beach closures. Details reflect 28000 lf of shoreline at an average width of 150 feet.

75%

NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0.13

Zion, Beach

Park, Waukegan, IDNR Install drainage swale improvements or other lot level / source control BMPs to capture and treat runoff from commercial and industrial land uses within Critical Subbasins #15, #74, and #76, identified as potential Pollution Hot Spot Critical Areas. Cost estimate reflects the installation of swales (10' wide) or other treatment measures along perimeter of these land uses, approximately 35,000 lf of treatment area.

100%

19,250 21 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 1.1.2

Waukegan, IDNR, Lake County Restore the natural connection and habitat quality of this reach to Lake Michigan by removing the lagoons through which the reach runs and disconnecting the reach from the Dead River to the north. Since these lagoons may be a component of a remedation or clean up plan, this should be considered a long term recommendation to be implemented when the contamination issues at Johns Manville have been adequately remediated. Details reflect major channel restoration.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 1.1.4

Waukegan, Lake County Address potential hazardous / toxic runoff from industrial uses to the east through filter strips and other filtration and infiltration techniques installed between the reach and these land uses, or by containing and remediating runoff on site through other means. Cost estimate reflects the installation of 2000 lf of 20' wide infiltration and filtration BMPs.

100%

1,100 1

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 1.6.1 Beach Park, Lake County Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by installing pools and riffles and installing boulders, large rocks, and / or rootwads.

25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates

K-34 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

1.6.2 Beach Park, Lake County Restore native riparian buffer by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub canopy, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

2.0.1 Zionion Beach Park Category 1 and 2 green infrastructure areas along the western boundary of Illinois Beach State Park and bordering the Union Pacific rails to the west should be preserved as components of the green infrastructure / greenway system that includes Ophir Park, Carmel Park, and Illinois Beach State Park. These areas contain significant low lying depressional storage areas (#55, #56, and #57) that could be used for water quality improvement, wetland / hydric soil complexes, and steep slopes that are unsuitable for development.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.0.2

Zion, Beach Park Convert the depressional storage complex of #55, #56, and #57 to improve water quality for Critical Subbasin #2, identified as a potential Pollutant Loading Hotspot.

Assumes runoff can be directed into this area, treated, and discharged to the Illinois Beach State Park stream and wetland system. Estimated area to be converted is 7000lf by 400ft wide.

75%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA 2.0.4

Zion, Beach Park Reduce pollutant loading to Critical Subbasin #2, a potential pollutant loading hotspot, by improving swales and other surface stormwater drainage systems and installing stormwater filtration and infiltration BMPs to capture and treat runoff from parking lots, utilities, rooftops, storage areas, and other areas that may contribute pollutants to the stream.

Cost estimate assumes 130,000 lf (approximately 30 acres) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements as a proxy for on-site source control BMPs.

75%

139,425 146 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 3a.0.1

Zion, Beach Park Manage and restore the wooded ravine along reaches BL25, BL26, and BL27.

Average 5000' x 250' wide.

75%

5,713 12 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

1 3

3 2

1 1

1 1

3a.0.2

Zion, Beach Park Preserve and restore wetlands along drainage channel upstream of the McClory Bike Path and the complex northwest of Lewis and 29th St., wetland #4 east of Lewis Avenue, and wetland #3 in Hermon Park (56 acres total). Regional storage area #77 and the associated wetlands (9 acres) could be restored and / or used to provide storage for this SMU if needed when the upstream area develops.

Implementation details reflect wetland /

hydric soils preservation and restoration.

75%

12,804 27 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

3a.0.4

Zion, Beach Park Preserve and restore T&E habitat within the area bounded by Lebanon St., the McClory Bike Path, and 31st St.

75%

1,103 2

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

1 3

3 1

1 NA NA NA Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-35 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3a.0.5

Zion, Beach Park Improve any swale and other surface stormwater drainage systems and/

or install source controls and lot level stormwater filtration and infiltration BMPs within the developed areas of the SMU. These practices may help reduce pollutant loading in potential pollution hotspot subasins S1, S3, S4, and S48.

In order to generate cost and pollutant load reduction estimates, road swales are used as a proxy for individual site BMPs.

Details reflect 252,000 lf (approximately 58 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements on both side of all roads.

100%

6,600 7

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 3a.25.1

Zion, Beach Park Address Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

79,200 36 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3a.25.2

Zion, Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning. A wider, partially forested buffer is appropriate in the lower parts of the reach.

100%

3,212 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3a.25.3

Zion, Beach Park Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

2,200 5,280 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3a.25.5

Zion, Beach Park Inspect hydraulic structure for possible erosion problems and stabilize using bioengineering practices if needed.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3a.27st.1

Zion, Beach Park Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

6,424 11 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.0.1 Beach

Park, Waukegan Preserve and restore wetlands where these resource remain along drainage channel BL15, BL16, BL17, and along the daylit portions of the Wilson Avenue Tributary. Area is 10,000 lf by 300' wide.

75%

13,592 29 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

3b.0.4 Beach

Park, Waukegan Preserve greenway easements on Category 1 and 2 green infrastructure areas along BL16, which may help reduce pollution loading in potential pollution hotspot S57. Cost estimate assumes easements of 2000 lf by 100 ft wide (4.5 acres).

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-36 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.0.6 Beach

Park, Waukegan Depressional storage areas #32 and #43, currently undeveloped and containing current or former wetlands, could be enhanced to improve water quality of runoff from surrounding residential uses within this Critical Subbasin #57, identified as a potential pollutant loading hotspot. Depressional area #43 lies in an open Category 1 green infrastructure area that could be preserved for water quality improvement. Details reflect restoration and enhancement of both areas as wetlands.

75%

2,462 5

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

NA 3

NA NA NA 1

3 NA 3b.0.7 Beach

Park, Waukegan Improve swales and other surface stormwater drainage systems and install source controls and lot level BMPs, including detention basin improvements, within the developed areas of potential pollutant loadin hotspots S57, S59, and S63. Details reflect 165,000 lf (approximately acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level /

source control BMPs on each side of all roads.

75%

176,963 186 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 3b.15.1 Beach

Park, Waukegan Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by enhancing pools and riffles. 25%

NA NA NA NA NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.15.2 Beach

Park, Waukegan Address High streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

725,760 302 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.3 Beach

Park, Waukegan Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

4,497 8

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.15.4 Beach

Park, Waukegan Inspect footbridges and armored /

concrete-lined banks for impacts on the stream corridor and remediated if necessary. 100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3b.15.5 Beach

Park, Waukegan Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

3,080 10,349 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3b.15.6 Beach

Park, Waukegan Inspect and, if necessary, repair the culvert under the McClory Bike Trail, which is partially collapsed.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.7 Beach

Park, Waukegan Remove debris obstructing flow using American Fisheries Society guidelines.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 1

1 NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-37 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3b.15.8 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize typical 4-6 foot bank erosion using bioengineering stabilization measures. Length difficult to determine from photo; assume 100 lf and 1 side of stream for cost estimation purposes.

100%

12,960 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.9 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize erosion of the Beach Road steel culvert experiencing erosion around and underneath using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.13 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.14 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.15 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize erosion around clay drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.16.1 Beach

Park, Waukegan Restore stream channel and improve instream habitat by enhancing pools and riffles and installing boulders, large rocks, and / or rootwads.

25%

1 1

1 1

NA 3

NA NA NA NA 1

NA NA NA 3b.16.2 Beach

Park, Waukegan Address Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which may help reduce the instream silt / sedimentation load.

100%

138,600 63 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.16.3 Beach

Park, Waukegan Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

5,621 9

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3b.16.4 Beach

Park, Waukegan Install residential lot level stormwater BMPs, such as rain barrels or rain gardens, to reduce runoff discharge from roof or footing drains.

100%

3,850 16,170 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA NA NA NA 1

1 1

NA 1

3b.15.16 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize erosion around two plastic drain pipe outfalls using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

108 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.15.17 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize erosion around concrete drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-38 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates 3b.18.1 Beach

Park, Waukegan BL18 flows through and near several publicly owned, open and partially open areas on or adjacent to the Waukegan Regional Airport property sourthwest of the Wadsworth Rd / Lewis Ave intersection. These areas include depressional storage area #34, which could be expanded and enhanced for stormwater storage and to capture and cleanse water runoff from airport property, which lies in Critical Subbasin #69, a potential pollutant loading hotspot.

75%

1,379 3

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1

3 NA 3b.18.2 Beach

Park, Waukegan Stabilize Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

27,720 13 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3b.18.3 Beach

Park, Waukegan The culvert draining Waukegan Airport is covered with wire fencing, presumably for security or to prevent animal invasion.

However, investigate source and necessity, and remove if fencing impedes flow. It appears that strong flows exit the Airport property in this location.

100%

NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 NA1 3c.0.2 Beach Park, Zion Manage and restore the wooded ravine along reaches BL07, BL08, BL09, BL10, BL11, BL19, BL20, BL21. Assumes 18,600 lf of stream by average 250' wide.

75%

21,078 44 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

1 3

3 2

1 1

1 1

3c.0.4 Beach Park, Zion Preserve and restore wetlands along drainage channels BL21, BL22, BL23, BL24. Assumes 10,300 lf by 350' wide.

75%

16,350 34 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

3c.0.5 Beach Park, Zion Preserve Category 1 green infrastructure area bounded by the McClory Bike Path, Clover, Wadsworth, and 34th St. that borders the stream channel to the north.

Also preserve three separate areas through which the stream corridor runs:

one along BL07 within the ravine, the second at the confluence of BL08, BL09, and BL19, and the third just upstream of this confluence along BL09.

75%

2,167 5

63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

3c.0.6 Beach Park, Zion, Waukegan Install filtration BMPs for commercial, industrial, and institutional uses along Sheridan Road, Wadsworth, and Lewis Avenue, which will help reduce pollutant loading in potential pollution hotspot subbasin #64. Details reflect 12,000 lf of road frontage along these uses to be treated with improved, 10' swales (approximately 2.75 acres.)

100%

6,600 7

30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 3c.0.7 Beach Park, Zion, Waukegan Install lot level filtration and infiltration BMPs within potential pollution hotspot subbasin #64. Details reflect 208,000 lf (approximately 48 acre) of 10 foot wide drainage swale improvements / lot level /

source control BMPs on each side of all roads.

75%

223,080 234 30-90%

BOD 62-90%

HC; 14-100% TM 1

NA 2

NA NA NA NA 2

NA NA 3c.0.8 Beach Park, IDNR Preserve the Category 1 open green infrastructure area that contains depressional storage area #45 along the west side of the Union Pacific rails.

100%

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-39 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N ID# (SMU.reach.ID)

Jurisdiction Recommendation Description (those addressing critical areas in italics)

Area Improvement Target (percent)

Water Quality: TSS / sediment (lb/yr)

Water Quality: Nutrients (Phosphorous lb/yr)

Water Quality: Low dissolved oxygen Water Quality: Aquatic life toxicity Water Quality: Fecal coliform Habitat Degradation: Lack of habitat characteristics Habitat Degradation: Hydrologic disturbance / f ow alterations Habitat Degradation: Wetland loss /

degradation Habitat Degradation: Exotic &

invasive species Habitat Degradation: Loss /

degradation of buffer Habitat Degradation: Streamside alterations Flood Flows: Runoff rate and volume Flood Flows: Loss of storage Flood Damage: Floodplain encroachment Impairment Reduction Target 100%

100%

50%

25%

50% 25% 50% 90% 25% 75% 75% 75% 90% 100%

3c.7.1 Beach Park, IDNR Stabilize High streambank erosion along approximately 25% of this reach not included in the previous stabilization project, some threatening homes and property, using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

129,600 54 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.7.2 Beach Park, IDNR Manage native riparian plant communities within this reach: control invasive species, plant native species, and manage vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

2,891 5

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.21.1 Beach Park, Zion Stabilize Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

138,600 63 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.21.2 Beach Park, Zion Restore and manage the native riparian buffer plant communities along this reach by controlling invasive species, planting native species, thinning forest and shrub vegetation to allow more ground vegetation, and managing vegetation such as through prescribed burning.

100%

5,621 9

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA 3

NA NA 3

3 2

1 NA 2

3c.21.3 Beach Park, Zion Repair the discharge point / failed headwall approximately 200' upstream of the McClory Bike Path.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.21.4 Beach Park, Zion Stabilize channel erosion at outfall, and consider replacing rip rap control measure with bioengineering stabilization practices.

100%

2,592 1

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.21.5 Beach Park, Zion Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 3c.21.6 Beach Park, Zion Stabilize erosion around plastic drain pipe outfall using bioengineering stabilization measures.

100%

54 0

30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA 4.0.2

Waukegan, Beach Park Manage and restore the woodland ravine along reach BL05. Assumes 5000' by 500' area for cost estimation purposes.

75%

11,425 24 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 3

1 3

3 2

1 1

1 1

4.0.4

Waukegan, Beach Park Preserve and restore the wetland complex within the open, Category 1 green infrastructure area along the eastern boundary of SMU 4 west of the Union Pacific rail line. This area creates a physical land connection between Lyons Woods and Illinois Beach State Park, and would also preserve regional storage area #17.

75%

7,289 15 63% BOD 90% HC; 36-69%

TM NA 1

1 3

1 2

1 1

3 1

4.05.1

Waukegan, Beach Park Stabilize Moderate streambank erosion along entire reach using bioengineering stabilization measures, which may help reduce the silt / sediment accumulation.

100%

118,800 54 30-50%BOD 62-75%

HC; 14-71%TM NA NA NA NA NA 1

2 NA NA NA Table K9 Multiple Jurisdictionis Plan Implementation Pollutant Load Reduction Estimates (continued)

K-40 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Watershed Restoration Strategy Effectiveness TSS Recommendation Effectiveness Unit Load Reduction Source for effectiveness Source for Load Notes Stream/Shoreline stabilization Severe 90%

Lbs/ft/yr 144 129.6 IEPA worksheet IEPA worksheet, 4 bank, LRR=0.4 Assumes Loam soils Moderate 90%

Lbs/ft/yr 22 19.8 IEPA worksheet IEPA worksheet, 3 bank, LRR=0.08 Assumes Loam soils Low 90%

Lbs/ft/yr 6

5.4 IEPA worksheet IEPA worksheet, 2 bank, LRR=0.03 Assumes Loam soils Protect & restore wetlands/woodlands 85%

Lbs/ac/yr 309 262.7 Land use change avoidance LCSMC unit area loads, sewered res Effectiveness based on comparison between open space and residential Native Buffer 73%

Lbs/ft/yr 1.1 0.803 IEPA worksheet for Filter Strip LCSMC unit area loads, unsewered res Assumes 300 foot tribtary area/ft of buffer Swale naturalization /

source control / lot level BMPs 50%

Lbs/ft/yr 1.1 0.55 Best guess LCSMC unit area loads, unsewered res Assumes 300 foot lawn and 15 foot road tributary area/ft of swale, reduction relative to turf swale; assumes 20 sf of swale area per 1 linear ft of swale Retrof t curb & gutter 65%

Lbs/ft/yr 2.2 1.43

IEPA, worksheet for swale LCSMC unit area loads, sewered res Assumes 300 foot lawn and 15 foot road tributary area/ft of swale, sewered res land use Table K.10. TSS Load Reduction Estimates (CDF 2006)

K-41 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Watershed Restoration Strategy Effectiveness P

Recommendation Effectiveness Unit Load Reduction Source for effectiveness Source for Load Notes Stream/Shoreline stabilization Severe 90%

Lbs/ft/yr 0.06 0.054 IEPA worksheet IEPA worksheet, 4 bank, LRR=0.4 Assumes Loam soils Moderate 90%

Lbs/ft/yr 0.01 0.009 IEPA worksheet IEPA worksheet, 3 bank, LRR=0.08 Assumes Loam soils Low 90%

Lbs/ft/yr 0.002 0.0018 IEPA worksheet IEPA worksheet, 2 bank, LRR=0.03 Assumes Loam soils Protect & restore wetlands/woodlands 68%

Lbs/ac/yr 0.81 0.5508 Land use change avoidance LCSMC unit area loads, sewered res Effectiveness based on comparison between open space and residential loading rates Native Buffer 45%

Lbs/ft/yr 0.003 0.00135 IEPA worksheet for Filter Strip LCSMC unit area loads, unsewered res Assumes 300 foot tribtary area/ft of buffer Swale naturalization /

source control / lot level BMPs 20%

Lbs/ft/yr 0.003 0.0006 Best guess

- assumes TP removal effectiveness is 40% of TSS removal effectiveness LCSMC unit area loads, unsewered res Assumes 300 foot lawn and 15 foot road tributary area/ft of swale, reduction relative to turf swale; assumes 20 sf of swale area per 1 linear ft of swale Retrof t curb & gutter 25%

Lbs/ft/yr 0.006 0.0015

IEPA, worksheet for swale LCSMC unit area loads, sewered res Assumes 300 foot lawn and 15 foot road tributary area/ft of swale, sewered res land use Table K.11. P Load Reduction Estimates (CDF 2007)

K-42 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Table K.12. Effectiveness of BMPs Recommended for Fish Lake Drain (NIPC)

BMP Objective BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Runoff Runoff Volume Control Physical Habitat Preservation Sediment Pollution Control Nutrient Control BOD Other Rate Control Pollutant Control*

Control Impervious Area Reduction 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

Impervious Area Disconnection 2

2 1

2 2

2 2

Filter Strips 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

Swales 2 2

1 2

2 2

2 Inf ltration 2

3 1

3 3

3 3

Devices Porous 2

2 1

3 3

3 3

Pavement Wet Detention 3

1 2

3 2

3 2

Wetland 3

1 2

3 2

3 2

Detention Dry Detention 2

1 1

2 1

1 1

Settling Basins 2

1 1

2 2

2 2

Water Quality Inlets 1

1 1

2 1

1 1

Sand Filters 1

1 1

3 2

2 2

Rock Outlet 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

Protection Storage Area Cover 1

1 1

2 2

1 2-3 Street 1

1 1

1-2 1

1-2 1-2 Sweeping Source Controls 1

1 1

1 2

2 2

Stream Protection/ Restoration 2

1 3

2 2

2 1

Wetland Protection/ Restoration 2-3 2-3 3

2-3 2

2-3 2

Key 3 = Fully achieves objective; 2 = partially achieves objective; 1 =

minimally achieves objective

• Other pollutants include toxic compounds such as heavy metals and pesticides, fecal bacteria, petroleum based hydrocarbons, and deicing materials such as salt. A 2 in this column indicates that the BMP controls some of these pollutants but not others.

Source: Price and Dreher, Model Best Management Practice Selection Methodology and Lake County Decision Making Framework, Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, July 1994.

K-43 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Table K.13. BMP Effectiveness (CDF Flint Creek)

BMP Objective (Removal / Reduction in Percent)

Annual TSS Removal Annual TP Removal Annual BOD Removal 2-Yr Rate Reduction Annual Runoff Volume Reduction BMP Impervious Area Recuction 14% for I1&I2=25&20 9% for I1&I2=25&20 14% for I1&I2=25&20 18% for I1&I2=25&20 13% for I1&I2=25&20 Impervious Area Disconnection See Filter Strips and Swales See Filter Strips and Swales See Filter Strips and Swales See Filter Strips and Swales See Filter Strips and Swales Filter Strips (a) 90% for R=0.5 72% for R=5 64% for R=0.5 37%

for R=5 64% for R=0.5 37%

for R=5 negligible 40% for R=0.5 18% for R=5 Swales 70%

30%

30%

10%

15%

Inf ltration Devices 94% for P=1.0 83% for P=1.0 83% for P=1.0 2% for P=1.5; 35%

for P=2.0; 100% for P=3.0 76% for P=1.0 Wet Detention (b) 92%

72%

72%

90-98% for I>20%

Negligible Wetland Detention (b) 90%

63%

63%

90-98% for I>20%

Negligible Dry Detention (b,c) 70% for I=10 27% for I=10 27% for I=10 90-98% for I>20%

Negligible Settling Basins (d) 88% for I=25; 75% for I-75 62% for I=25; 41% for I-75 69% for I=25; 43% for I-75 51% for I=25; 0%

for I-80 Negligible Sand Filters (e) 75-90%

30-45%

30-50%

0 0

Water Quality Inlets 39%

13%

13%

0 0

Weekly Street Sweeping 16%

6%

6%

0 0

Key:

(a) R is ration of impervious area to f lter strip area I=percent Imperviousness

= 100/(1+1/R)

(b) Removal rates for Lake County detention design R=Ration of treated impervious area to pervious area = 1/(100/I-1)

© Dry detention may not be feasible for high impervious %

P=design Precipitation event (inches)

(d) Removal rates for Lake County divert and detain requirement (e) Austin Texas reported removal rates

K-44 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Table K.14. Pollutant Removal Eff ciencies for Selected Groups of BMPs (Center for Watershed Protection)

Median Stormwater Pollutant Removal Rate (Percent)

Best Management No. of Total Suspended Solids Total Soluble P3 Total N4 Nitrate Carbon 5

Practice Studies 1

P2 Detention pond 2

7 10 2

5 3

(-1)

Dry ED* pond 6

61 19

(-9) 31 9

25 Wet pond 30 77 47 51 30 24 45 Wet ED* pond 6

60 58 58 35 42 27 Ponds A 36 67 48 52 31 24 41 Shallow marsh 14 84 38 37 24 78 21 ED* wetland 5

63 24 32 36 29 ND Pond/wetland 1 1

72 54 39 13 15 4

Wetlands 35 78 51 39 21 67 28 Surface sand f lters 6

83 60

(-37) 32

(-9) 67 Filters B 11 87 51

(-31) 44

(-13) 66 Channels 9 0

(-14)

(-15) 0 2

18 Swales C 9

81 29 34 ND 38 67

• ED = extended detention 1 Number of performance monitoring studies 2 Total P

total phosphorus 3 Soluble phosphorus as measured as ortho-P, soluble reactive phosphorus or biologically available phosphorus 4 Total N = total nitrogen 5 Carbon

measure o Source: Center for Watershed Protection

K-45 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N Table K.15. Pollutant Removal Eff ciencies for BMPs (Center for Watershed Protection)

Median Stormwater Pollutant Removal Rate (Percent)

Best Management Practice Bacteria E Hydro-Cadmium Copper Lead Zinc Carbons F Detention and Dry ED* Ponds ND ND 54 26 43 26 Ponds A 65 83 24 57 73 51 Wetlands 77 90 69 39 63 54 Filters B 55 81 34 71 80 Channels 0 ND 55 14 30 29 Swales C

(-50) 62 42 51 67 71

• ED = extended detention. A Excludes conventional and dry ED ponds. B Excludes vertical sand f lters and vegetated f lter strips. C Includes biof lters, wet swales and dry swales. D The number of studies is less than 5 for some BMP groups for bacteria, T Table K.16. Pollutant Removal Eff ciencies for BMPs (IEPA)

Pollutant Removal Rate (Percent)

Best Management Practice BOD COD TSS Lead Copper Vegetated Filter Strips 50 40 73 45 Grass Swales 30 25 65 70 50 Inf ltration Devices 83 94 Extended Wet Detention 72 86 40 Wetland Detention 63 50 77 65 Dry Detention 27 20 57 50 Settling Basin 56 81 Sand Filters 40 82 WQ Inlets 13 5

37 15 Weekly Street Sweeping 6

16 Inf ltration Basin 65 75 65 Inf ltration Trench 65 75 65 Porous Pavement 80 90 1

Concrete Grid Pavement 90 90 90

K-46 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N appendix K - watershed pollutant loading and plan implementation pollutant loading reduction estimates Sand Filter/Inf ltration Basin 55 80 60 WQ Inlet w/ Sand Filter 55 80 80 Oil/Grit Separator 5

15 15 Wet Pond 40 60 75 Source: IEPA Nonpoint Source Unit, Pollutant Load Reduction Spreadsheets Table K.18. Sediment Pollutant Potential Removal Rate*

Sediment 75%

Total nitrogen 40%

Total phosphorus 50%

Trace metals 60-70%

Hydrocarbons 75%

• Riparian buffer potential removal rate based on combined 25-foot grass strip in outer zone and 75 foot forested buffer in middle and streamside zone.

Source: Schueler, T.R. Comparative Pollutant Removal Capability of Urban BMPs: a Reanalysis. Watershed Protection Techniques Technical Note 95: 2(4), 1995.

Table K.17. Pollutant Removal Eff ciencies for BMPs (IEPA) (continued)

Pollutant Removal Rate (Percent)

Best Management Practice BOD COD TSS Lead Copper

K-47 T H E D E A D R IV E R l WAT E R S H E D - B A S E D P LA N