ML15188A190
| ML15188A190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/02/2008 |
| From: | Testing Service Corp |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Sargent & Lundy |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15188A105 | List:
|
| References | |
| ZS-2015-0084 L-72, 070 | |
| Download: ML15188A190 (49) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS October 2, 2008 L - 72,070 ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION PREPARED FOR: SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 55 EAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PREPARED BY: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 (630) 653-3920
Section I. TEXT 1.0 2.0 Introduction Field Work TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ....................................................... 2 2 3.0 Geophysical Testing.................................... *.......... 4 4.0 5.0 Laboratory Testing Closure 4 5 II. APPENDIX
REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
October 2, 2008 L-72,070 Presented in this report are the results of the soils investigation performed to determine the general subsurface conditions for the proposed construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage facility. The proposed structure will be constructed at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Zion, IL. This work was performed in general accordance with Technical Specification Subsurface Investigation Specification Z-5701 prepared by Sargent and Lundy and dated July 29, 2008. 2.0 FIELD WORK A total of two(2) soil borings (1-20 and 1-21) were performed for this project with each of them being extended to a depth of 100.0 feet. Boring 1-20 was subsequently converted into a seismic cross hole survey source hole. Additionally, two (2) boreholes were drilled and completed with 3" PVC casing for cross hole seismic testing. Upon completion of the drilling and testing, ground surface elevations as well as Northing and Easting coordinates were determined for the drilling locations using a Trimble R8 GPS. The vertical and horizontal data shown on the Boring Location Plan was retrieved from a National Geodetic Survey data base located approximately 1.2 miles south of Zion, Illinois. Sargent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 The boreholes were initially advanced by 4 1/4" hollow stem auger methods to the ground water table and then completed by rotary wash methods using bentonite and potable water in accordance with ASTM D 5783. Upon completion, each borehole was sealed with cement-bentonite grout placed by tremie methods. Soil samples were collected at 1-20 on 2.5 foot intervals for the entire 100 foot depth. At location 1-20 the sampling interval was 2.5 feet for the first 10 feet and 5.0 feet thereafter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) - N Values (ASTM D 1586), were determined using an automatic hammer which allows a 140 pound weight to free fall from a 30 inch drop to drive the sampler. The samples were collected using standard split spoon procedures during SPT since granular soils and/or very stiff clays prevented the use of Shelby tube samplers. Liners were not used with the split spoon samplers. Dynamic energy measurements have not been made on this automatic hammer. However, Pile Driving Analyzer's (PDA) have been used to process dynamic measurements of strain and acceleration between the drill string and similar hammers made by the same manufacturer (Boart Longyear). The Average Energy Transfer Ratio is accepted as 75% for this model hammer. The soil types were logged in the field by the drill crew and representative portions of each sample were contained in glass jars per ASTM D 4220 and brought back to our laboratory. Boring Logs defining the soil lithology and ground water observations is included in the Appendix of this report. Ground water depth was determined during hollow stem auger drilling only. The borings were completed using wet rotary methods and therefore, the water levels inside the boreholes at the completion of the drilling were not representative. PVC casing was installed shortly after the completion of the drilling and reaming at location 1-20. Boring 1-21 was sealed with grout immediately following the drilling and sampling to prevent an open hole hazard. Therefore, 24 hour water level readings were not obtained. The ground water depth measured during the hollow stem auger drilling is considered the most accurate indication of the undisturbed ground water levels at the site. Sargent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 3.0 GEOPHYSICAL TESTING Geophysical testing consisting of a Cross Hole Seismic Investigation, was performed at location 1-20. The original bore hole (1-20) was reamed to a depth of 100 feet using a 6" tri cone roller bit and then cased with 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-bentonite grout. Two additional holes (1-20A and 1-20B) were drilled using a 6" tri cone roller bit to a depth of 100 feet and were located in a straight line at approximate distances of 10 and 20 feet from 1-20. These bore holes were also completed with the installation of 3" PVC casing sealed in place with cement-bentonite grout. The Cross Hole testing was performed by Geotechnology, Inc. In general conformance with Section 4.31 of ASTM 04428. A copy of the report prepared by Geotechnology, Inc. summarizing the test results is included in the Appendix of this report. Following the testing each of the PVC casings were sealed with bentonite chips which were hydrated upon placement. In addition the PVC was cut off near the ground surface and topsoil was place over the holes. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obtained from the borings were examined in our laboratory and visually classified according to the Unified Soils Classification System (ASTM 0 2488). Cohesive soils were measured for moisture content (ASTM 0 2216) and unconfined compressive strength (ASTM 0 2166). Add itional testing including grain size distribution (ASTM 0422, 0 1140), Alterberg Limits (ASTM 04318), pH (ASTM G 51) and dry unit weight determinations (EM 1110-2-1906) were performed on samples selected by Sargent and Lundy. The results of this testing has been summarized and incorporated into the Soil Test data Sheets included in the Appendix. Two (2) soil samples selected by the client were analyzed for soluble chlorides (Method 4500CL,C) and soluble sulfates (Method 4500S04, E) by First Environmental Laboratories. A copy of their report is Appended. Sargent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 5.0 CLOSURE The data and results presented in this report are based upon the conditions encountered at the two (2) locations investigated as indicated on the Soil Boring Location Plan. This report does not reflect any variations that may occur between these locations, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until the construction phase of the project. We are appreciative of the opportunity to assist you with this project and look forward to working with you in the future. Please call if you have any questions or are in need of further information. Respectfully Submitted, A/,.(~- MiCh;97v~ Machalinski Vice !'5resident Registered Professional Engineer Illinois No. 062-038559 Prepared By,. Darin Delaney Project Geologist
APPENDIX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION CHART LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS TWO (2) BORING LOGS (6 pages) BORING LOCATION PLAN (1 page) GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT Geotechnology, Inc. (16 pages) SOIL DATA SHEETS (12 pages) TWO (2) ANALYTICAL REPORTS First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (5 pages)
H
- x TESTI NG SERVICE CORPORATION UNIFlEO CLASSIFICAT ION CHART 0
~ 0 z ~ - CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNING GROUP SYMBOLS AND GROUP tlAMES USING LABORATORY TESTS 0 GRAVELS Mort Ihon ~Oo/o CLEA N GRAVELS o f CGo'U Lus Ih on 5°10 ,. oclion relolned fine s C C u < 4 ond/o. I> Cc > 3 e 0 0 No. 4 siev.. GRAVELS WITH Fines ( Ioui fy as ML 0 ' Mil S OI L CLASSIFICATION GROUP HW80L GW GP GM GROUP NAME b Poo.lyg'oded g.ovel f Si lly g. ovt'l f,O,1I GC Cloyey q.ovel f, q, II ~ ~ FI NES Mo.e Ilion Fines clo ssHy os CL or CH ~ 0 ~ f-____________ ~c " OOC'o~HCOC*O*-' ------~----------------------------------------------_1f---_1----------------------i i ~.~ w 0 _0 * " ~, o o, SA ND S 50 °/0 0' more of eoo,st' Iroclion pOISU N o. 4 sieve CLEAN SANDS Lus Ilion 5 °/0 ,jnes d SAN DS WITII FINES Mo,e Ilion 12 0/ 0 flnt's" Cu'-:'60nd/o' I > Cc!>3 e Fines clossj,y as ML o. Mil Fines c lossi ' y as CL 0 < CH SW SP S M SC CL Wt'II-q'oded sond, Poo. ly q.oded liond 1 S illy sand 0,11, ' Cloyt'y sand 0, II, I Leon cl oy k,I, m 0 ~ SI LTS e CLAY S Liquid limil leu Ilion 50 0/0 PI:> 7 ond plol s on or above "A' line j Ino.qon;c f---------------------'-------------------------------------+----+--------------------_1 0 PI <: 4 a. plots bt'low .. A " lin e j ~ z ~. o~ w z **
- .~
O,oonic Liquid Ii mil oven dried Liquid limil - nol dried "'" 0.75 o P I plats on a. obove "A' line w 0 z, S ILTS {} CLAYS Liquid limi l 50 0/0 a. mo. e PI plo t li bela.. A line Orqonic liquid limil - oven droed <0 7~ Liquid limil - nol dri e d IHOhly a.oanic soit s Prima rily o.gonic mott e',dork 'n color, and oJonic a d o.
- o. Ba H d on lhe molt.lol passing Ihe J-in 17 5 - mm) Ileve.
b. 1I fiel d sa mpl~ cOnl oil'led cobbles ond/o. boulders,odd ".. ith cobbles al'ld/o ' boul der" 10 g.o u p nom e.
- c. Grovels wi lh 5 10 12 ala fint'S require dual symbols GW-GM 1,,11 oroded grovel.. ith sill GW - GC.. ell oroded g rovel.. ith cloy GP - GM poorly (traded g rowel.. illl s.1t GP-GC poor ly qroded q.ovel.. illI cloy
- d. Sa nds.. il ll 5 010 10 12 °/0 fil'les *
- quire duol s ymbol s SW-SM.. ell (traded sond.. ill, silt SW-SC.. t il (traded SOlid.. illI clOl SP - SM poo.ly I)rod.d sOl'ld.. ilt, s;lI Sf>- SC poo" y g. oded sand.. il lI cloy C _
(030' c - ~O " so il conlains ~ 15 0/0 SOlld,Odd ".. itll sand" 10 I)roup nom *. g.1f fines clonily os CL - ML,lIu dua l symbo l GC - GM,SC-SM. II. It fil'lu a rt' aJonie, odd .. itll o.gonic fines" 10 ? rOUP l'I ome. I II soi l conloil'll? 15 °/0 orovel,odd".. ilh orov.I' 10 I)roup nome. 0 ML Sill.,I,m OL O'oonic cloy.,I,m,n Organic si ll -, I,m,o roO cloy k,I,m M" Elos lic sill k,l,m 0" O. qonic cloy *,I,m,P O' 'Jonic sill k,I, m,q PT P t'ol I. If Alle.berg limit s pial 11'1 hOlched area, soi l is a CL - ML,,i lly c loy.
- k. 1I soil con loins 15 10 2 9 °/0 plus No. 200,odd ".. " hsond" Or "",illl 9rovt'I".... hic hever 'S predominol'll.
.... soil conloins ?;,. 30 °10 plus No. 200, p. e d omll'lonlly !ol'ld, odd "sandy" 10 (t.oup nome.
- m. 1I soi l c on'oins~JO °/oP11l5 Na. 200,p'edarninOl'llly Olave l, odd o rovr IlY 10 oroup nom e.
n. PI~4 and plo l s 01'101 obovt"h" IIl'Ie.
- o. PI~ 4 0. plo ls btto.. ':{Io':, line.
- : ~~ ::::~ ~:I:;.~:,fl~: e ~ IIl'Ie.
V / V / / / 0 V :? / / v' ~.; O~/ 0 / O~ // / V ~ / 0 V V ~J * // / 'v MH OR 0 0 V / O~ / // / 0 r --;;; / V ML 0 O L L-ML)!:; '///,Y oV 0 , o '0 JO . 0 '0 .0 10 80 90 '00 L10UID LIM IT ( LLl
FILL TOPSOIL SAMPLE TYPE: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS ~ PEAT GRAVEL SS Split Spoon ST Thin:Walied Tube A = Auger SAND SILT CLAY FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST DATA: N = Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot Wc Qu In-Situ Water Content Unconfined Compressive Strength in Tons per Sq uare Foot DOLOMITE Pocket Penetrometer Measurement; Maximum Reading = 4.5 tsf yD Dry Unit Weight in Pounds per Cubic Foot WATER LEVELS : SOIL DESCRIPTION : V \\l... While Drilling End of Boring 24 Hours MATERIAL BOULDER COBBLE Coarse GRAVEL Small GRAVEL Coarse SAND Medium SAND Fine SAND SILT and CLAY COHESIVE SOILS CONSISTENCY Qu Very Soft Soft Stiff Tough Very Tough Hard Less than 0.3 0.3 to 0.6 0.6 to 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 2.0 to 4.0 4.0 and over MODIFYING TERM Trace linle Some PARTICLE SIZE RANGE Over 12 inches 12 inches to 3 inches 3 inches to '/. inch '/. inch to No.4 Sieve No.4 Sieve to No. 1 0 Sieve No. 10 Sieve to No. 40 Sieve No. 40 Sieve to No. 200 Sieve Passing No. 200 Sieve COHESIONLESS SOILS RELATIVE DENSITY Very Loose Loose Firm Dense Very Dense PERCENT BY WEIGHT 1 - 10 10 - 20 20 - 35 _ N_ 0-4 4 - 10 10 - 30 30 - 50 50 and over
z H ~ "' is Ul 0,.., III U ~ Ul H Cl ~ Q o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 ~ 40 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuc lear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-20 '-="'----- DATE ST ARTED _-,8,-...:.: 1 2 =---~08,,-_ ELEVATIONS GROU ND SURFACE_-,5~8~7~ . 2~ END OF BORING _..::4~8~7~.2~ _ __ _ (90 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC au DEPTH ELEV. ~~ NO. TYPE ~ IX 1 SS 5* 11*13 3.0 584.2 Ixi 2 SS 2* -~ 2*4 5.5 581.7 . X* 3 SS 2* 1-1 X* 4 SS 1* -~ 2*3 10.5 576.7 -...... xl 5 SS 8* 10-1 2 ~I 6 SS 7* 8-10 15.5 571.7 Ixl 7 SS 9* 23*22 " *x. 8 SS 10* 17-19 '.. xl 9 SS 13* 14*21 23.0 564.2 xl 10 SS 14* 30*29 25.5 561.7 tl 11 SS 8-26.6 5*5 28.0 559.2 ~ ~I 12 SS 8-11.0 4.5+' 129.9 ~ 10*11 ~ ~I ~ 13 SS 8* 11.2 6.73 128.4 9*13 ~ ~ xl 14 SS 7* 20.5 4.73 108.5 ~ 7*10 ~ xl ~ 15 SS 10* 12.8 6.90 125.2 14-15 38.0 549.2 IX. 16 SS 31* 14.8 120.4 5015" ~ DRILL RIG NO. 315 DIVISion lines beh.ccn depoSits represent dppro-:irnale boundClli(!s Ilel::een sOlllWes IIl-S!Il1. the transition may ba grmJlI<l1 DATE COMPLETED _-'8..... 1.:..4.:.... "'0.:..8_ JOB L.. 72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \\l AT END OF BORING _ _ ---'M"'u::.d::..:..R:::o..::ta:..:r,Ly-'W"'a:::s:..:h-'-__ ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Firm brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) v Loose brown and gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) \\ S-2: % Graval = 8 / % Sand = 86 oj" Silt and C la~ - 6 Loose dark gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Firm gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) S-7: % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 91 % Silt and Clay = 4 Dense gray fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, saturated (SP) Dense gray fine SAND, trace silt, saturated (SP-SM) Firm gray sandy SILT, saturated (Ml) S-12: (ll, Pl, PI) 22,11, 11 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 24 % Silt = 52 % Clay = 21 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very dense gray clayey SilT, very moist (Ml) Page 1 of 3
f-<
- u.
z H ~
- u. g; UJ 0
00 ~ f-< UJ H " § o u i" PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Pow0'...r.'.P.. la.. n... t __ _ CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING .'.1-.=2 c::.0 __ DATE STARTED _--,8'...-.:.:12::.-",08:::....._ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE _-'5,,8.. 7... 2=--___ END OF BORING _..::4,,8.. 7.. ,2=--___
- ..; "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N
WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. ~~ NO. TYPE 55 60 65 ~ 40.5 546.7 -I ~ 17 SS 11-9.6 10.71 133.8 14-14 ~ ~ I 18 SS 10-10.6 5.90 131.0 ~ 10-11 ~ xl ~ 19 SS 11-10.5 9.38 131.3 13-13 ~ ~ xl 20 SS 8-12.9 5.12 124.4 ~ 12-15 ~ xl ~ 21 SS 9-13.8 5.06 122.7 10-13 ~ ~ xl 22 SS 8-13.4 5.32 123.7 ~ 12-14 ~ 61 ~ 23 SS 12-13.4 6.23 123.7 ~ 16-17 ~ ZI 24 SS 12-15.7 5.12 118.3 - ~ 15-15 ~ C>I ~ 25 SS 10-20.3 4.07 108.8 11-13 ~ xl ~ 26 SS 8-20.1 3.93 106.9 ~ 9-11 127 SS 8-13.8 4.53 11 7.7 8-8 40 45 50 68.0 519.2 1 28 SS 10* 17.4 3.01 114.6 50/6" / 29 SS 70 72.5 514.7 - ;;; X 30 SS 25-7.6 14.57 113.8 34-42 - ;;; 1 31 SS 21-
- 11. 1 4.5*..
- 129.6
/ 31-36 75 78.0 509.2 IX 1 32 SS 37* 10.7 130.7 50/5" - 80 D I~I LL RIG NO. 315 DIVISion hnes bct'.-.een del}QSlls represent appfO"unatc buumt[lries beh'.een soil lypes in*Sllu tile transition may be gradual DATE COMPLETED _ -,8'..-1.'.4.'.-.::08,,-_ JOB L-72,07D WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' \\l AT END OF BORING __ ---'M.. u"d "-'-'R"'o" ta:::r.I.y--'W=as"h~ 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-22: (ll, Pl, PI) = 31, 12, 19 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 15 % Silt = 50 % Clay = 34 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional Cobbles, moist (Cl) Boulder Zone 69.5 to 72.5' Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl ) Very dense gray clayey SilT, lillie sancl, moist (Cl-Ml) Page 2 of 3
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lund
- LLC BORING
- ..1-.=2,-=0 __
DATE STARTED _ __ 8'---1.:.:2:...-0:::8'----_ DATE COMPLETED _ -,8,---1;..4;..-",0",8_ JOB L-72,070 ELEVATIONS WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5::8:.:.7.:.:.2=--___ _ V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 ' END OF BORING 487.2 'V AT END OF BORING __ ----'M",u:::d"-'.:R::o:.:.ta::.:r.!.y __ W=as... h~ ___ x~,---,-._-,--,-,,-._-._----------------~ to 0 SAMPLE ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) N WC Qu Y DRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Z U f-.'-'':=--j ~ ~ NO. TYPE 80-,rrnTT~_4_~I-~--~-~_+--~--~--~~ __ ~~~ (L~-n~,~' ,P~ I )r--~1~1*,~l rrU,,~I----------~ "Xl 33 % Gravel = ° SS 43-12.0 127.3 % Sand = 27 50/4" % Silt and Clay = 73 Xl 34 SS 44-85 - 50/4" /'11 ~ SS 9-8-9 X I 36 90 - SS 7-8-11 = Xl ~ SS 8-12-13 IXI 38 95 - SS 8-12-13 -*:<1'11 ~ SS 26-27-15 12.1 13.2 15.1 2.55 18.0 3.21 16.0 2.48 16.2 4.0' 17.3 3.0' 12.1 13.9 2.0 86.0 501.2 87.0 500.2 119.7 y~r~rJ(~ se gray clayey SILT, little sand, moist Firm gray clayey SAND, saturated (SC) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) Dense gray fine to medium SAND, saturated (SP) Very tough gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) _---l'l..l.JL4'IX--'1 40 SS 2~~;8 11.9 2.0' 5 100 ~ -+--~~-~-_4-_4--~-+-----------------~ ~l w In W ~ [-0 (J) '4 Cl 105 - ~ " 110-11 5 -- End of Boring at 100.0'
- Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer.
Diedrich D-120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer R B I 20--L--~-L-L--~-~~~~~~~~~==~._~--------------------- DIVISion hnes between deposits represent ~ DRILL RIG NO. 3 1 5 <'lpprOXnllale boundaries bel\\'.'een salt types ~ in-sllu, the transition ma~' be gradual Page 3 of 3
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power P l an~ ________________ _ E-< Z H ~ !3 Ul 3 ~ ~, Ul H ~ ~ ~, i;l,-, ~ " ~ CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-21 DATE START E D _ -'8'--".::18::.":0°8"---_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SUR FACE _ --'5,,8,,7.:.:.1'---___ _ END OF BORING -=4,,8,,7.:.:,1'---___ _ E-< '-' 0 SAMPLE YDRY z u N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. ~~ NO, TYPE -~ h -~ IX 1 SS 6-8-9 3.0 584.1 o -,> IX 2 SS 4- ' - ~ f-' 7-10 5.5 581.6 5 -,'.'. xl 3 SS 4-5-9 - :'"- XII 4 SS 10- ~.". 13-1 5 10 X_ SS 5 8-13-14 15
- ~,
-, 'IX. 6 SS 11-13-13 20 22.0 565.1 X. 7 SS 10-15-12 25 27.0 560.1 "0' X 8 SS 6-8-11 30 32.0 555. 1 ~ ~ xl 9 SS 16-12.7 5.41 122.7 ~ 16-21 ~ ~ 35 38.0 549. 1 --i 10 SS 36-12.2 4.5+' 50/4" ~ 40 ~II DIVISion lines bel'.. een depoSits represent appro)[unate boundaries beh°.'een S!)II I}PCS. in-sllll, the tranSItion may be gradual ~ DRILL RIG NO. 315 DATE COMPLETED 8"18"08 JOB L"72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATI ONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' \\l AT END OF BORING ___ --'-R"'oc:ta.:::r"'y_W'-'-=a-=-sh"---_ l' 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Firm brown and gray clayey SAND and GRAVEL, damp (SC-GC) Firm brown and gray SAND, trace gravel, damp (SP) \\S-2: % Gravel = 1 I % Sand = 95 % Silt and Clav ~ 4 S-5: % Gravel = 24 % Sand = 72 % Silt and Clay = 4 Firm gray SAND, some gravel, occasional Cobbles, saturated (SP) Firm gray SAND, saturated (SP) Firm gray silty fine to medium SAND, saturated (SM) S-9: (LL, PL, PI) = 28, 14, 14 % Gravel = 1 % Sand = 8 % Silt = 59 % Clay = 32 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, trace sand, trace gravel, moist (CL) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel. occasional silt searns, damp ICL-IVILl r age 1 of 3
Co OJ OJ z H OJ !3 (f) '" ° W W u
- i!
Co (f) H 0 ~ >-o " ~I U ~ 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 PRO,IECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING ,-1-=2-,-1 _ DATE STARTED _ -,8,--1.:.:8,--",08,,--_ ELEVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___ 5.,.8.:.7'-',1 _____ _ END OF BORI NG _--=4:::8,,7.:.,1'--___ _ Co "0 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV, ~~ NO. TYPE 42,0 545.1 V xl 11 SS 16-13,0 4.0' 124.7 22-25 Xl 12 SS 15-9.7 9.22 133.5 31-34 52,0 535.1 IX~ 13 SS 26-9,9 3.5' 50/3" 58,0 529,1
- ~ IX.
- ~ 14 SS 17-29 - ~ 5011" ~ - :~ - ;~ .. ~. - ~ IX* - ~ 15 ss ~: 27-24-24 -~.:
- ~:
- ~ ::
- ~:
68.0 519.1 IX 16 SS 14-14,5 7,73 121.1 17-20 /: xl 17 SS 14-15.7 2,5' 118,3 17-23 - ? - ? -rt1 lxl 18 5S 16-13,3 6.23 124.0 16*18 ......J..1LI __ DRILL RIG NO, 315 01'/'510n hnes bel.. cen depoSits represent approxllna!C bOllildarics bel\\".ecn sOll lypes. In-situ. tile tranSition ma~/ be gradual DATE COMPLETED 8-18-08 JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5,5 ' '\\! AT END OF BORING ___ --cR~o~ta~rC1y~W= a :osh"--__ _ ... 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS very tougn to hard gray very silty GLAY, lillie sand, trace gravel, occasional silt seams, damp (CL-Ml) S-11 : (ll, Pl, PI) = 23, 12, 11 % Gravel = 5 % Sand = 20 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 24 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Dense to very dense gray SAND and GRAVEL, occasional Cobbles and Boulders, saturated (SP-GP) Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) S-17: (l l, Pl, PI) = 25, 12, 13 % Gravel = 3 % Sand = 19 % Silt = 51 % Clay = 27 Page 2 of 3
- u.
z H '" i;!
- u.
!3 Ul 3 0.., U ~ c' Ul H Cl 00 ~ PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORI NG .:.1--=2:..:1'-----__ _ DATE STARTED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-.::0:.8 _ ELEVATIONS GROUNDSURFACE _-,5~8~7-,- .I,-----___ _ END OF BORING _--=4.. 8~7-,-.1,-----___ _ ,... 00 SAMPLE YDRY zu N WC Qu DEPTH ELEV. '" ~ NO. TYPE 80 IX_ 19 SS 10-13.4 4.5+" 18-21 85 87.0 500.1 IX 20 SS 11-17.5 3.5' 22-26 90 95 !X 21 SS 15-13.2 4.5+* 20-25 100 10122 SS 20-10.3 4.5+" 29-37 105 - 11 0 - 115 - 120 DRILL RIG NO. 315 D,VISion lines bell.cen deposits represent approxllnatc boumlMlcs beh':een 5011 types. in-situ. the IranSI\\lon may be gractl1at Ii &--131 DATE COMPLETED _-,8:.-.:.:18:.-..:::0.::8_ JOB L-72,070 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS V WHILE DRILLING 5.5 ' \\l AT END OF BORING ___ ---'R"'o"'t.::a:Jry'--W=a":'s"h __ _ T 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Very tOUgll to Ilard gray silty CLAY, liltle sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little sand, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl-Ml) End of Boring at 100.0' . Approximate unconfined compressive strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer. Diedrich 0 -120 Truck Rig (#315) CME Automatic Hammer Page 3 of 3
Boring I 1-20 1-21 EXYWIT Z5701-1 BORING LOCATION PLA~ i~ ZION.NUCLEARPo\\¥ER PLANT ISFSI SITE #1 *. ~. ~ 587.2 587.1 ~ N ~ DRAWN BY: TRP ~ TESTING SERVICE CORPORA nON CHECKED BY: '1~ 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE (L .mJ CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 JOB NO.: L-72,070 1 OF 1 DATE: October 2008
ProjectslDeliverables1979802 _ crosshole.doc GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ZION, ILLINOIS Preparedfor: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION Carol Stream, illinois Prepared by: GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. St. Louis, Missouri Geotechnology, Inc. Report No. 0979802.851S September 15,2008
GEO! ECHNOlOGY, INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SAINT LOUIS* COLLINSVILLE' KANSAS CITY September 15,2007 Mr. Darin Delaney Testing Service Corporation 457 East Gundersen Drive Carol Stream, lllinois 60188
Reference:
Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois
Dear Mr. Delaney:
0979802.85IS Presented herein are the results of the crosshole seismic test for the referenced site. This work was conducted in general accordance with proposal P14676.00.85IS dated July 31, 2008. Presented in this report is a description of the geophysical method and data plots. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (314) 997-7440. Very truly yours, GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Glen 1. Adams Senior Geophysicist GLAlDWL:gla/sjc Copies Submitted: (3) @prifllf1don recyded paper ~J?l~ Dougl . Lambert, P.G. Senior Project Manager-Geophysics 11816LACKLAND ROAD. SUITE 150' SAINT LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146
- 314/997-7440
- FAX: 314/997-2067
GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0979802.85IS 1.0 IN1RODUCTION............................................................................................................. I 1.1 Site Description..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METI:lODOLOGY.............................................................................. 1 3.0 RESULTS....................................................................................... :.................................. 1 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location and Topography....................................................................................................... 1 Plan of Site and Boring Locations.................................................................................................. 2 Relative Borehole Locations..........................................................................................................3 Shear (S) Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus vs. Depth...............................................................4 Compressional (P) Wave Velocity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus vs. Depth............... 5 Summary Table - Crosshole Results.............................................................................................. 6 Source Boring Deviation................................................................................................................ 7 Geophone Boring I Deviation....................................................................................................... 8 Geophone Boring 2 Deviation........................................................................................................ 9 APPENDIX Limitations of Report..................................................................................................................... A
GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
0979802.851S 1.1 Site Description. The site consists of an existing nuclear power plant near Zion, illinois. A site location map is presented on Plate 1. The crosshole borings were located approximately 900 feet soufu of fue switch yard within the plant perimeter fence, as shown on the site plan on Plate 2. 1.2 Scope of Work. The scope of work included mobilizing geophysical equipment and personnel to the site, conducting a crosshole seismic test, and processing/interpreting the data. The seismic data were processed, and shear and compressional wave velocities were calculated to detennine dynamic soil properties. The seismic data were plotted and the results are presented in this report. Engineering analysis or reco=endations based on this data are outside our scope of work. 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY The crosshole seismic testing method involves generating compressional (P) and shear (S) wave seismic energy at periodic depth intervals within a borehole and measuring the seismic wave travel-times at geophones situated at the source depth between two adjacent boreholes (per ASTM Standard D4428). The seismic wave arrivals at the geophones are transmitted through cables to the seismograph for digital recording. The data are interpreted by analyzing the differences in elapsed travel-time from the source to geophones. P-and S-wave velocities can be calculated for each depfu interval by analyzing the travel-time data. The distance between boreholes may vary wifu depth; fuerefore borehole deviation logging is conducted to adjust fue borehole separation distance wifu depfu for the velocity calculations. 3.0 RESULTS Crosshole seismic testing was conducted using a source boring and two adjacent receiver (geophone) borings, indicated as Borings 1-20 (source), 1-20A (Geophone 1), and I-20B (Geophone 2), respectively, as shown on Plate 3. Crosshole data were recorded on 5-foot intervals throughout the depfu of fue borings. Due to a physical limitation of the crosshole equipment, data could only be collected to a depfu of 97 -feet from the surface. The borings were cased to
========================c-!!! Testing Service Corporation September 15, 2008 Page 2 0979802.851S approximately 99-feet and the downhole equipment requires approximately 2-feet from the bottom of the casing to collect data. Seismic velocities calculated between the source boring and the two geophone borings are presented on Plates 4 and 5. A table of all tabulated values and velocities is presented on Plate 6. Plates 7 through 9 are plots of the deviation from vertical for the three borings used for the crosshole test. Due to the inherent noise in the earth, and lateral variations in soil velocities between the test borings, some variations in velocities were calculated between the two receiver holes. An average velocity is plotted on the crosshole data plots that allows a smoother fit to the data. Densities used for the moduli calculations were based on lab values provided by the client as wet uoit weights. @ Ill/nrad (In I,cycled paper
=================== GOCmOCHN~ ~=================
NOTES Plan adapted from a 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. map for Zion, illinois Quadrangle, last revised In 1993. 1 INC. ENGINEERING NlD ENVIRONfwENTAlSERVICES ST. LOUIS
- COUlNSV1lJ.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois PLATE 1
NOTES 0ROSSH~ETESTBO~GS
- 1.:20 (SOURpe)
I*~A (GEQPH9NJ:! 1} 1-208 (GEOPHONE Z)
- 1. Plan adapted from an aerial photograph courtesy of Google Earth.
LEGEND Boring Location / I I V / t o 300 ~-- 600 SCALE IN FEET PLATE 2
10 8 6 4 2
- 2
-4 .fl.
- 10 1_------- 19.9811-------**
10.5 II 2 4 6 SOURCE 9.48ft 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 GEOPHONE1 GEOPHONE2 INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SERVICES ST. LOUIS* COLlJNSVIUE. ~SAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion. Illinois PLATE 3
Shear Wave Velocity (!psi 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 0.0 5.0 ---,.1>>-~' ----:----+----:----i---- 10.0 - - -~ --.. +tJ" -:--* ---:-----i---- 15.0 --- ~ --
- t*3-C'-:----
- ----~---~----
20.0 25.0 --- ~-- -- t.a-, *---t --- -~ --- ~- --- ---.... __ __ +_ ~ :-. __ 4- ____ I- ___ ~ ___ _ 30.0 I 1 I I I I ---~- -- - ~- -- ~--~ ---~- -~---- 35.0 ---~----~--- -:-. -.{ -- --~---~---- _ 40.0
- 5. 450 J:
is.. SO.O a 55.0 60.0 --- -: ---- ~ ----:-- -- ~ - ~.... ----l---- ---~ -- -- +-- --:----+- - at---- ~-- -- ---~----t---7--- ~ * - ~ --- ~ ---- ---~----t - -- ~--- I ~~ -~- -- ~ ---- ---.... ---- +---.-.~ --... t----... ---- 65.0 I I I I I I ---~----T---~--.~ ----~---~---- 70.0
:----~----~-- il ----~---~----
75.0 ---,---- {-----:----{-.o-:----,---- 80.0 -- -~ ---- + ----:----. --.~ -- _t -._- 85.0 ---~----t---~----{ tt - - ~ ~ -~---- 90.0 95.0 -- -~----7 ----:-- --~--- - ~- - -~ ---- - -- ~ - -- -+ - - - - - -- it I. VS (S-Gl). VS(S-G2) DVS e AVERAGEVS I Soil DescripUoo Sand SiR Clay 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 .c
- 15. so.o
~ 55.0 SO.O 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 Shear Modulus (Ksil. 20 40 60 80 __ -----~------ ~-- - - - --T - - -----
+-:-------l-------+ -------
~~ ------ ~ ------- + -- -----
~~------~-------~-------
~ ------~-------~-------
- - ---- - - -- -- -4 " - - - - - +- ------
4--- -.--~-------T-------
:------ -~ --.. ---i -------
[--------{------. +-------
:-------l---+---+-------
~-------~ ~ - -- --+-------
:-----.. ~- ------7 -------
-_____ ~ ___ ----~- - ----- 4 ----- - -
~----- ~ ~-------+-------
:----- - - ~ - -.--- -~ - ------
~-------~-------+- ~----
~-- ---- ~ - ~ ---- + -------
:-----+ l---- ---+ -------
-!- -------!$ -----+- ------
INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SBMCES ST. LOUIS* COWNsvtL1.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois
COMPRESSION (P) Waw Velocity (fps) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0.0 I I 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ 40.0 S 450 ~. ii 50.0 2l 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 I I I I
, -----,------r-----T-----
- 4i-ef----- ~ ------ :_ ---- -t-- - - - .~. ~.L -_ I _____ _ L.. ___ __.L ____ _ I I I I - + -----4------~----- + ----- I I I I -- ~,. -.,. - - ---.,- -- - - - r- - -- -- 1" -----
C.. ---- ~ ------ :_- ---- ~-- ---
1-&:'--. -----:------+ -----
+
- ---~ - ---....et - ---- t -----
__ ___ ~ _____ ~ ______ L.. ~ ---.L-I J I I
.. --+--D---
-- -~- ---- ~- ---- I I I I
1'.--
- ~.-,.. ---r- - -- - -1" -- - -- --- - -~- - -. ~ ID --- - :----- - ~ -----
1 ----3 -:---. -:------ i------
{ - -- ~ -- +- -- ~ -----T-----
~-- - -c :
- -----~-----t-----
ofo----- -{------.... :1- --++ -----
~ ----~ ----- ~ - ~-- ~ ---- - - --- + -----~... --:H~------ l.. -- --- _____ l _____ J __ ____ L _____ L [. VP(S-G1) -. W(5-G2) ow. AVERAGEW I Soil Descr1ption Sand Silt Clay Posslon's Ratio and Young's Modulus (193 ksl) 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.0 +1--I--!---+---:-"1 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
r -----+ -----+\\-- ----:-----
-.:=---r -----+-----~ -----.. ---- - ~ -- t- ---- -:- -----~---- _.: - -- - - __ :1 __ L._ -- - - + --- -- -I -+ __ _1_ ---- I I I I --=--~----- T ---- ~----- ~ ---- -
t- --- ~ ----- ~ -----~-----
~} ---- -+- -- --4-~ --~- - ---
f -~--- + ----- ~ -- ~ -~- ----
} --~ -t- ---- ~ -----~- ~ --
_____ L. _= ___ + _____ -I ___ ~ -I----- 1 I I I - - -- - ~ C- - - - T - - - -- - - ---I" --- - ----~---- -i-----~-----~~ --- g 35.0 ,5 40.0 ! 45.0 CD 50.0
- g 55.0
~ 60.0 m 65.0 } ----- + ----- ~ ----- ~~ --- 70.0 -- -- ~ - - - - - t ----- -t ---- -*,- - - - - 75.0 --- --~ -':I -- - -:- ----- ~ --.... - ~ ---- - 60:0
i --- - Ct ----- ~ ----- ~.... ---
85.0 -- - -- t-i:'! - - - + - --- - ~ -- - - -+----- I I I I 90.0 -----I:::-----T-----'-- ---.,--+-- 95.0. ---- - I ~..::.=j. Poisson's Ratio I
- Y ClUng's Modulus INC.
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONM:NTALSERVICES sr. LoutS* COlUNSVlUE* KANSAS arv Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois
DEPfH (FT) SHEAR VELOCITY P-WAVE VELOCITY UNIT WEIGHT SHEAR MODULUS POISSON RATIO YOUNG'S MODULUS (AVERAGE. FTfSEC) (AVERAGE FT/SEC) (LBICU FT) (KSI) (KSI) 5 455 836 128 575 029 1483 10 752 1865 128 1573 040 44.13 15 802 1890 128 1788 039 4971 20 807 1590 128 1798 033 4771 25 866 1609 128 20.84 030 54.01 30 1246 2030 130 43.81 020 104.91 35 1159 2379 109 31.75 034 85.38 40 1371 2921 120 4895 036 13302 45 1420 4263 131 5736 044 164.92 50 1371 2970 124 5059 036 138.06 55 1272 3360 124 43.52 0.42 123.29 60 1184 3230 118 3590 042 102.12 65 1066 2839 107 26.39 0.42 74.85 70 1181 2806 115 3476 039 9686 75 1390 2890 114 4776 035 12896 80 1528 4208 131 66.37 0.42 169.04 85 1302 3073 127 46.70 0.39 129.88 90 1193 3963 115 35.54 045 10306 95 1304 5448 115 4246 047 124 81 97 1279 5200 122 43.34 047 12723 Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy: eM App"i1lBy~ Dais; 011-15-08 Dais; 1 Iisio 8 DaIs;l1~ .GEOTECHNOLOGY'NC. ENGINEERING AND ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVIU.E. KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois
SUMMARY
TABLE
- CROSSHOLE RESULTS
~~9~~2.~:' I PLATE 6
- n nn e-Cl
-1~ 0 ~.t 0
- ~. O
-::.0
- 2 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 40 5 0 z
n _n OV ~~ Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck"d By: Ct.t App'vd.... /g." ~l.~ Date: rlm'R Date: ~.c7"'l -'~GIN~2LAL~ ST. LOUIS. COUJNSVILlE* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ctnI ID"" ..... n, Ilun PrCjOCX N~ PLATE 7
~~ t ~ ~ ~
- ~
II: ~ ~~
- E
-3 -:; 0 . I 1:: -.0 -4.0 0 -1.0 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 0 Z
- n
~n "n ~ ~n Easting (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy:6'U App'Vd ~l.~ D~ Date:'}1dO;> ~GINes:u~G AND ENVlRON"""'AL~ sr. LOUIS* COWNSVIUE* KANSASQTY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ---.j ::.::;;_...... ,IIUN ~_N= PLATE 8
An 'In ~ ~ n iE' ~ CD.e = 1::: -~ 0 0 -4 0 -~.0 -;;.0 -1 0 00 1 0 20 30 40 50 z -~.~ In A " Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'd By:(,'Z-?. App'vd ~ Date: I Date: "II<!"" 'V ~? ~ I I I... ",. IT INC. ENGiNEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVILLE* KA.NSAS arv Zion Nuclear PoWer Plant Zion, illinois ~ 2.. ~n,,llun PLATE 9
APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS OF REPORT
GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES LIMITATIONS OF REPORT
- 1. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the owner, architect, and engineer for evaluating the project as it relates to the technical aspects discussed herein. It can be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions included in this report.
Unless other contractual agreements were made, the services described in this report were carried out in accordance with the Terms for Geotechnology's Services which were attached to the proposal.
- 2. Geotechnology endeavored to perform the crosshole seismic geophysical survey in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. The findings and conclusions stated herein must be considered not as scientific certainties, but rather as professional opinions concerning the significance of the limited data gathered during the course of the survey. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
- 3. The geophysical analyses and conclusions contained in this report are based on the site conditions, project layout, sampling interval, geophysical data, and interpretive procedures described herein. Geotechnology can make no interpretation of underground conditions beyond the test location. Geophysical exploration methods are indirect and potentially influenced by a variety of natural or man-made conditions. The resulting interpretations are based on the quality of the recorded data as limited by site conditions Revised 03/09/04 Stdparl9798crosshole.doc
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: PROJECT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL ISFSI Project Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion, IL Carol Stream, 111inois SOIL TEST DATA LOCATION BORING NUMBER 1-20 1-20 SAMPLE NUMBER 2 7 DEPTH IN FEET 3.5 - 5.0 16.0 - 17.5 HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SP SP GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION GRADATION - PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % 100 100 GRADATION - PASSING 3/B" SIEVE % 95 99 GRADATION - PASSING # 4 SIEVE % 92 95 GRADATION - PASSING # 10 SIEVE % BB 91 GRADATION - PASSING # 40 SIEVE % 79 71 GRADATION - PASSING # 100 SIEVE % 14 B GRADATION - PASSING # 200 SIEVE % 6 4 SAND AND GRAVEL % 94 96 SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED % 6 4 CLAY % <<0.002 MM) LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH 9.26 SOLUBLE CHLORIDES <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % 1-20 12 2B.5 - 30.0 CL 100 99 97 95 B5 77 73 27 52 21 22 11 11 11.0 129.9 TSC Job No. L - 72,070 September 9, 2008 1-20 1-20 22 32 53.5 - 55.0 7B.5 - BO.O CL CL 100 99 99 97 100 92 9B BB BB B4 73 16 27 50 73 34 31 17 12 10 19 7 13.4 10.7 123.7 130.7
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive CLIENT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL PROJECT: ISFSI Project LOCATION BORING NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH IN FEET Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion, IL HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (TSF) GRADA n ON - PASSING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING 3/4" SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING 3/8" SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING # 4 SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING # 10 SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING # 40 SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING # 100 SIEVE % GRADATION - PASSING # 200 SIEVE % SAND AND GRAVEL% SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBINED% CLAY % << 0.002 MMl LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTIC LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % DRY UNIT WEIGHT pH SOLUBLE CHLORIDES Carol Stream, Illinois SOIL TEST DATA 1-2 1 1-21 2 5 SP SP 86 86 100 79 99 76 99 71 96 62 9 7 4 4 96 96 4 4
- 9. 11
<50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 ORGANIC L-O-I % CONTENT WET COMBUSTION % NP - Not Possible 1-21 9 CL 5.41 100 99 98 95 92 91 9 59 32 28 14 14 12.7 122.7 TSC Job No. L - 72,070 September 9, 2008 1-2 1 11 CL NP 100 98 95 93 85 79 76 25 51 24 23 12 11 13.0 1-2 1 17 CL NP 100 98 97 96 89 83 78 22 51 27 25 12 113 15.7 124.7 11 8.3
oc z w "i 6 u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1/2 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I ~ I I I I I 90
. ~
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 \\ \\ 10 \\ 0 100 10 1
- 0. 1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fin e coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE
% PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 8 86 (6% Com ined) 3/8 95
- 4 92
- 10 88
- 40 79
- 100 14
- 200 6
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 "4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I, T I I I I I "'-I'---< 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 \\, 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I I GRAVEL SAND SILT ORCLAY COBBLES I coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, Irace sill, clay and gravel Sample: 7 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 91 (4% Com ined) 3/8 99
- 4 95
- 10 91
- 40 71
- 100 8
- 200 4
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-<U SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
~ " ~ z w '3 6 00 l,J.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I T I I I I t- ~ 90 .f'-- 80 ~ 70 60 " t 50 1\\ "\\ 40 30 20 'I'-.. 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL I SAND J SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine Icoarse medium fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel Sample: 12 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 24 52 21 3/8 99
- 4 97
- 10 95
- 40 85
- 100 77
- 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO.
L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-ZU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 112 3/8 3 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 701 00140200 100 I I
- f-l, ~
I I 90 ~ 80 \\ 70 ~ 60 \\ 50 40 " 1\\ 30 20 10 0 100 10 1
- 0. 1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT ORCLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE
% PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 22 2 100 (Cll 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 15 50 34 3/8 99
- 4 99
- 10 97
- 40 92
- 100 88
- 200 84 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO.
L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 ,-.u SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER . 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/23/83 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140200 100 I I I I I I I I 90 80 \\ 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1
- 0. 1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE
% PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Borinq: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silly CLAY, some sand (Cl ) Sample: 32 2 100 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 0 27 (73% Corr bined) 3/8 100
- 4 100
- 1 0 100
- 40 98
- 100 88
- 200 73 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO.
L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 13/4 112 8 3 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I. I I 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 '\\ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse I fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel Sample: 2 2 100 (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 95 (4% Com ined) 3/8 100
- 4 99
- 10 99
- 40 96
- 100 9
- 200 4
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 5 1 314 112 318 3 4 6 8 10 14162030405070 100140200 100 I \\ I I I I I I I 90 ~ I-80 . 1"- 70 60 II 50 40 30 20 10 1\\ ~ 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION BorinQ: 1-21 3 inch 100 Light brown SAND, some gravel, Irace sill Sample: 5 2 100 and clay (SP) 1 1/2 100 1 86 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 86 24 72 (4% Com ined) 3/8 79
- 4 76
- 10 71
- 40 62
- 100 7
- 200 4
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 '-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 601 88
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/2 8 3 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140200 100 I I I I I I r--.. 90 r-.--.. "\\ 80
- \\
70 ~ \\ 60 50 ~ 40 1\\ \\ 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COBBLES coarse 1 fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, trace sand and gravel Sample: 9 2 100 (Cl) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SANO %S IL T %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 8 59 32 3/8 100
- 4 99
- 10 98
- 40 95
- 100 92
- 200 91 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO.
L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-[1 SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 114 1123/83 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140200 100 I I * 'i-- I I I I I ~ ~ 90 .1'-- 80 70 60 \\ 50 I' "\\ 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR CLAY COBBLES I coarse fine Icoarse medium I fine I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 11 2 100 (Cl ) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %S ILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 20 51 24 3/8 98
- 4 95
- 10 93
- 40 85
- 100 79
- 200 76 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO.
L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-L I SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I. "l-I I I I I 90 1"1"- ~ 80 70 ~r--... 60 '\\ 50 ~ 40 I~ f\\ 30 ~ 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILTOR CLAY COBBLES coarse fine coarse medium fine SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PA SS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel Sample: 17 2 100 (eL) 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 19 51 27 3/8 98
- 4 97
- 10 96
- 40 89
- 100 83
- 200 78 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO.
L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-'" SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563
- Phone (630) 778-1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 September 03, 2008 Mr. Darin Delaney TESTING SERVICE CORP.
360 So, Main Place Carol Stream, IL 60188 Project lD: 72070 First Environmental File ID: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008
Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:
The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on file for future reference. Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002045: effective 05/14/08 through 02/28/09. I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional information, please contact me at (630) 778-1200. g;~v Project Ma\\~ger Page lof4
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shorc Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phonc (630) 778-1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 Case NalTative TESTING SERVICE CORP.
Project ID: 72070 First Environmental File JD: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008 I Ftagl Descriplion I Ftag I Descriplion Analyle not detected at or above the repotting limit. L+ LeS recovery olltside controllilllils; high biilS. D Analytc detected in associated method blank. L-LeS recovery outside control limils; low bias. C Identi fication confillned by GC/MS. M MS recovery outside conlrollimils; LeS acceptable. D Surrogates diluted out; recovery not available. M+ MS recovery olltside conlrollimits high bias; LeS acceptable. E Estimated result; concentration exceeds calibrJlion range. M-MS recovery olltside control limits low bias; LeS acceptable. F Field measurement. N Analyte is 110t pmt of a liI' NELAC accreditation. G Surrogate recovcry outside control limits; matrix effect. 1-1 Analysis or extraction holding time exceedcd. Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range. K RPD outside control limits. Routine Reporting Limit (Lowest amount that can be RL detected when routine weights/volulllcs are used without dilution.) NO Analyte was not detectcd using a library search routine; No calibration standard was rumlyzcd. P Chemical preselvation pH adjusted in lab. Q 'lllC analyte was dctennined by a GC/MS dattlbase search. S T Analyte was sub-contracted to another laboratory for analysis. Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0_6°C \\V Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix. All quality control criteria, as outl ined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the following analytical report. Sample Batch Comments: Sample acceptance criteria were met. Page 20f4
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditntionll [00292 -"""!'~!!!== 1600 Shore Rand
- Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 Clicnt:
Analytical Report TESTfNG SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 Salll pie ID: 1-20 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-00 I Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH @25°C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08128/08 13:30 pH @ 25°C, I: I 0 Result Method: 4500CL,C < 50 Method: 4500S04,E < 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.26 Date Collected: 08/27/08 Tillie Collected: 10:00 Date Received: Date Reported: R.L. Units 50 mg/kg ISO mg/kg Units 08/27/08 09/03/08 Flags Page 30f4
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road
- Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 Client:
Analytical Report TESTING SERVICE CORP. Project ID: 72070 SampleID: 1-2 1 S-2 Sample No: 8-3902-002 Analyte Chloride, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Chloride, Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Analysis Date: 09103/08 Sulfate, Soluble pH @ 25°C, 1:10 Analysis Date: 08/28/08 13 :30 pH @ 25°C, I: 1 0 Resnlt Method: 4500CL,C < 50 Method: 4500S04,E < 150 Method: 4500H+B 9.11 Date Collected: Time Collected: Date Received: Date Reported: R.L. Units 50 mglkg 150 mglkg Units 08/27/08 10:00 08/27/08 09103/08 Flags Page 4 of4
,~.. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. First Environmental Laboratories 1600 Shore Road, Suite D Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail: firstinfo@firstenv.com !EPA Certification #100292 Project 1.0.: 1201 0 P.O.#.: Matrix Codes: S = Soil W = Water 0 = Other DatefIime Taken Sample Description FOR LAB USE ONLY: r f Cooler Temperature: O.1~-6gC Yes_ N/ I) s: ' Q C Received within 6 hrs. of co ction: __ _ Ice Present: Yes_ No CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pagc __ of _ _ pgs Cornp~tny Name: -~SC Streel Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: e-mail: Send Report To:... Via: Fax 0 cornall 0 Sampled By:,I )~Y I 1/1 I hi (~ 1" ",,'" 7 Analyses Matrix Comments Lab LD. B-] 5 Sample Refrigerated: Yes_ No_ Containers Received Preserved: ~ 0 No Refrigerator Temperature: ___ ' C 5035 Vials Frozen: Yes_ No_ Freezer Temperature: ___ ' C Notes and Special Instructions: ____________________________________________________ _ Relinquished By: r j ),.A? DatefJlme Q-2.t-6:':1 <? z.' 3., Received By: I - j..---- 0 \\,../ DalefJlme v { v 'I II v '-" ( ~ Relinquished By: ~ DatefIime Received By: r Date!Time ___ 1 _ _ ______ _ Rc\\'. -'lOIl}}