ML20207K821

Rev 1 to Sequoyah Element Nonrestart Justification Summary, Deviation Documentation,Deviations to Pre-Op Test Acceptance Criteria

ML20207K821
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	12/22/1986
From:	Mcnutt G, Russell J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20207K654	List: ML20207K650 ML20207K665 ML20207K686 ML20207K717 ML20207K731 ML20207K740 ML20207K758 ML20207K785 ML20207K800 ML20207K821 ML20207K827 ML20207K849 ML20207K858 ML20207K881 ML20207K917 ML20207K942 ML20207K968 ML20207K979 ML20207L004 ML20207L017 ML20207L057 ML20207L069 ML20207L089
References
207.3(B), 207.3(B)-R01, 207.3(B)-R1, NUDOCS 8701090531
Download: ML20207K821 (4)

Text

._

3, TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 207.3(B)

SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE:

SEQUOYAH ELEMENT REVISION NUMBER:

1 n"

\\

NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION

SUMMARY

TITLE:

DEVIATION DOCUMENTATION Deviations to Pre-Op Test Acceptance Criteria PAGE 1 0F 2 REASON FOR REVISION:

Reviewed to incorporate TAS coments.

PREPARATION PREPARED B.r lYGb'(t

.Zu w

SIGNATURE DATE REVIEWS EVI COMMIITEE M6 SIGNATURE

/ /DATE Y$

/skz/]&

s i2['f6" SIGNATURE DATE CONCURRENCE 5 CEG-H:

/C WOM /2 K.

SRP: N

$ $MdSL U'N'M SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE

• DATE

• SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurr6 rices are in files.

APPROVED BY-Y b

/f *23 'W(o N/A ECSP MANAGER DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE k

CONCURRENCE (FINALREPORTONLY)

December 6, 1986 - Page 1 8701090531 861224 PDR ADOOK 05000327 P

PDR

V SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING RELATED EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM g

I NON-RESTART JUSTIFICATION SUhMARY SUBCATEGORY / ELEMENT 207.3(B)

The issues identified in this element refer to the possibility that the documentation of Engineering's evaluation of deviations to preoperational test acceptance criteria, is not adequate to determine the extent of detail performed in the evaluation process.

The issues are related to the determination of the level of detail required for documenting Engineering's evaluation of preoperational test results.

The issues expressed by the employee concern in this element are documentation and records related, and do not address the performance or the integrity of any plant system. Related concerns associated with possible testing program deficiencies, having potential impact on electrical system performance and integrity, were addressed in Sequoyah Element Report 213.2 as restart issues.

(No corrective actions were deemed necessary as a result of the 213.2 evaluation).

A review of the TVA practices and procedures governing preoperational testing concluded that the program within Engineering for documenting and-evaluating preoperational test results was adequate to reflect the

[,

requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix B and ANSI N45.2.9.

g V

The impact of this concern being valid would be the lack of a convenient record of the details of_ Engineering's review of deviations to preoperational test acceptance criteria. Documentation of that detail (to establish n " justification" of Engineering's decisions), is not pertinent to plant safety. Therefore, resolution of this programmatic issue is not considered to be a requirement for plant restart.

ATTACHMENT: List of Issues for Programmatic ELEMENT NO.

207.3(B)

Date:

10/05/86 i

l

(

l 06030 - Page 2

e SUBCATEGORY 207 - DEVIATION DOCUE NTATION F

ELEENT NUMBER 207.3 LIST OF PROGRA8MATIC ISSUES APPLICABLE ELEMNT DESCRIPTION E WLOYEE CONCERNS SQN RESTART - NO DATE: 10/05/86 Deviations to Pre-Op Test Acceptance IN-86-077,-001 Criteria ELEENT IMERE RESPON-CONCERN NUMBER ($)

ISSUES

?.DDRESSED SIBLE GENERAL APPROACH /NETH000 LOGY FOR ELEENT REPORT IN-86-077-001 1.

Deviations for Pre-op test acceptance 207.3 LA All Issues Deviations to pre-op test accept-criteria were accepted by ENCES ance criteria were accepted by without proper justification. (CI 1.

Review procedures and practices for pre-test ENOES without written justifica-indicates written justification is documentation processing and review for tion. It cannot be determined necessary.)

Review plant modification appilcations.

by the documentation in the test package whether or not a 2.

Documentation of the ENDES evaluation 207.3 LA 2.

Sample test review packages to determine adequacy of documentation of ENCES review detailed evaluation of the of Pre-op test deviations was process.

deviation was performed by ENDES.

inadequ.te to determine the extent of This concern applies to all the evaluation performed.

pre-op tests. (Unit 1) Details known to QTC. withheld due to confidentiality. CI has no further information. NUC POKR Concern.

l i

i i

t 0897d-49 C

D

C)

REFERENCE

- ECPSI20J-ECPS121C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY PAIE 67 FREQUENCY

- REQUEST OFFICE OF NUCLEAR POWER RUN TIME - 12:57:19 r

()

ONP - ISSS - RHM EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM SYSTEM (ECPS)

RUN DATE - 12/02/86 LIST OF EMPLOYEE CONCERN INFORMATION CATEGORY: EN DES

• PROCESS & OUTPUT SUBCATEGORY: 20703 DEVIATIONS TO PRE-OP TEST ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

()

S GENERIC KEYHORD A H

APPL QTC/NSRS P

KEYHORD B CONCERN SUB R PLT BBSH INVESTIGATION S

CONCERN KEYWORD C NUMBER CAT CAT D LOC FLQB REPORT R

DESCRIPTI6N KEYHORD D (g[

IN 077-001 EN 20703 N HBN YYYY SR DEVIATIONS TO PRE-OP TEST ACCEPTANCE TESTING T50178 REPORT CRITERIA HERE ACCEPTED BY ENDES WIT NONCONFORMANCE HOUT HRITTEN JUSTIFICATION.

'T CANN SYSTEMS O

OT BE DETERMINED BY THE DOCUUtteTATIO GEdERAL N IN THE TEST PACKAGE HHETHER OR NOT A DETAILED EVALUATION OF THE DEVIAT ION HAS PERFORMED EY ENDES. THIS CD C

i NCERN APPLIES TO ALL PRE-OP TESTS.

(UNIT 1) DETAILS KNOWN TO QTC, WITHH i

ELD DUE TO CONFIDENTIALITY. CI HAS NO FURTHER INFORMATION. NUC POWER C

! O ONCeRN.

1 CONCERNS FOR CATEGORY EN SUBCATEGORY 20703 O

i

()

i O

. ()

()

i f ()

O

()

O Hi J

-