ML061570385: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:!'FENOC 5501 North State Route 2 FirstEnergy Nuclear | {{#Wiki_filter:!'FENOC 5501 North State Route 2 FirstEnergy Nuclear OperatingCompany Oak Harbor,Ohio 43449 Mark B. Bezlla 419-321-7676 Vice President- Nuclear Fax: 419-321-7582 Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 June 1, 2006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 | ||
-Nuclear Fax: 419-321-7582 Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 June 1, 2006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: | |||
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Discrepancy Regarding the Amended Exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, for Boric Acid Precipitation Control Methodology (TAC No. MC2185)Ladies and Gentlemen: | Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Discrepancy Regarding the Amended Exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, for Boric Acid Precipitation Control Methodology (TAC No. MC2185) | ||
On February 13, 2004, the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submitted a request to amend an existing exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS), Unit Number 1, Operating License Number NPF-3, regarding boric acid precipitation control (BPC) methodology (Serial Number 3002).Supplemental information regarding this request was submitted by letter dated July 23, 2004 (Serial Number 3071).The February 13, 2004 letter described the original primary and backup BPC methods, and a proposed new BPC method, which was installed during the thirteenth refueling outage. The letter described in detail the original primary "APS" method, utilizing an auxiliary pressurizer spray flowpath alignment, the original backup "DHDL" method, utilizing a decay heat drop line flowpath alignment, and the new "HLI" method, utilizing a hot leg injection flowpath alignment. | Ladies and Gentlemen: | ||
As further described in the letter, under the proposed amended exemption, the HLI method would become the credited primary method and the APS method would become the credited backup method. The NRC granted the proposed request by letter dated November 29, 2004.The purpose of this letter is to document a discrepancy discovered in the November 29, 2004 letter. Contrary to the statement in the November 29, 2004 letter that "the original backup path would no longer be credited as part of the licensing basis, although it would remain as a third | On February 13, 2004, the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submitted a request to amend an existing exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS), Unit Number 1, Operating License Number NPF-3, regarding boric acid precipitation control (BPC) methodology (Serial Number 3002). | ||
[emphasis added]," the original backup path is no longer an option in the DBNPS emergency operating procedure. | Supplemental information regarding this request was submitted by letter dated July 23, 2004 (Serial Number 3071). | ||
This discrepancy was discovered and entered into the DBNPS corrective action program in November 2005. FENOC has been unable to determine the origin of the discrepant statement; the statement has not been found in the aforementioned docketed correspondence associated with the exemption request. | The February 13, 2004 letter described the original primary and backup BPC methods, and a proposed new BPC method, which was installed during the thirteenth refueling outage. The letter described in detail the original primary "APS" method, utilizing an auxiliary pressurizer spray flowpath alignment, the original backup "DHDL" method, utilizing a decay heat drop line flowpath alignment, and the new "HLI" method, utilizing a hot leg injection flowpath alignment. | ||
Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 Page 2 As described in the February 13, 2004 letter, FENOC elected to install the HLI method because it is simpler in design, easier to implement, and has fewer single-failure vulnerabilities than the previous methodology. | As further described in the letter, under the proposed amended exemption, the HLI method would become the credited primary method and the APS method would become the credited backup method. The NRC granted the proposed request by letter dated November 29, 2004. | ||
Because the DHDL method is susceptible to more points of single failure vulnerability, it would not add additional defense-in-depth, and has not been retained in the emergency operating procedure. | The purpose of this letter is to document a discrepancy discovered in the November 29, 2004 letter. Contrary to the statement in the November 29, 2004 letter that "the original backup path would no longer be credited as part of the licensing basis, although it would remain as a third optionprocedurally[emphasis added]," the original backup path is no longer an option in the DBNPS emergency operating procedure. This discrepancy was discovered and entered into the DBNPS corrective action program in November 2005. FENOC has been unable to determine the origin of the discrepant statement; the statement has not been found in the aforementioned docketed correspondence associated with the exemption request. | ||
Single failures that would render the credited methods unavailable would also disable the DHDL method.As discussed in a conference call with the NRC staff on November 15, 2005, FENOC's opinion is that the discrepant statement was not likely a central consideration as to the NRC decision to approve the amended exemption. | |||
In a follow-up conversation on January 30, 2006, the NRC staff recommended that FENOC send in a docketed letter describing the issue and the circumstances. | Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 Page 2 As described in the February 13, 2004 letter, FENOC elected to install the HLI method because it is simpler in design, easier to implement, and has fewer single-failure vulnerabilities than the previous methodology. Because the DHDL method is susceptible to more points of single failure vulnerability, it would not add additional defense-in-depth, and has not been retained in the emergency operating procedure. Single failures that would render the credited methods unavailable would also disable the DHDL method. | ||
This letter satisfies the NRC recommendation and requests no additional action. | As discussed in a conference call with the NRC staff on November 15, 2005, FENOC's opinion is that the discrepant statement was not likely a central consideration as to the NRC decision to approve the amended exemption. In a follow-up conversation on January 30, 2006, the NRC staff recommended that FENOC send in a docketed letter describing the issue and the circumstances. This letter satisfies the NRC recommendation and requests no additional action. , Commitment List, identifies that there are no commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. | ||
Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions by the DBNPS. They are described only for information and are not regulatory commitments. | Gregory A. Dunn, Manager - FENOC Fleet Licensing, at (330) 315-7243. | ||
Please notify Gregory A. Dunn, Manager -FENOC Fleet Licensing (330)-315-7243 of any questions regarding this document or associated regulatory commitments. | Ja*cll. B~ezilla, Vice President-Nuclear MKL Attachment cc: Regional Administrator, NRC Region III NRC/NRR Project Manager NRC Senior Resident Inspector Utility Radiological Safety Board | ||
COMMITMENTS DUE DATE None N/A}} | |||
Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 Page 1 of I COMMITMENT LIST The following list identifies those actions committed to by the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit Number 1, (DBNPS) in this document. Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions by the DBNPS. They are described only for information and are not regulatory commitments. Please notify Gregory A. Dunn, Manager - | |||
FENOC Fleet Licensing (330)-315-7243 of any questions regarding this document or associated regulatory commitments. | |||
COMMITMENTS DUE DATE None N/A}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:47, 23 November 2019
| ML061570385 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 06/01/2006 |
| From: | Bezilla M FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 3269, TAC MC2185 | |
| Download: ML061570385 (3) | |
Text
!'FENOC 5501 North State Route 2 FirstEnergy Nuclear OperatingCompany Oak Harbor,Ohio 43449 Mark B. Bezlla 419-321-7676 Vice President- Nuclear Fax: 419-321-7582 Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 June 1, 2006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Subject:
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Discrepancy Regarding the Amended Exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, for Boric Acid Precipitation Control Methodology (TAC No. MC2185)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On February 13, 2004, the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submitted a request to amend an existing exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS), Unit Number 1, Operating License Number NPF-3, regarding boric acid precipitation control (BPC) methodology (Serial Number 3002).
Supplemental information regarding this request was submitted by letter dated July 23, 2004 (Serial Number 3071).
The February 13, 2004 letter described the original primary and backup BPC methods, and a proposed new BPC method, which was installed during the thirteenth refueling outage. The letter described in detail the original primary "APS" method, utilizing an auxiliary pressurizer spray flowpath alignment, the original backup "DHDL" method, utilizing a decay heat drop line flowpath alignment, and the new "HLI" method, utilizing a hot leg injection flowpath alignment.
As further described in the letter, under the proposed amended exemption, the HLI method would become the credited primary method and the APS method would become the credited backup method. The NRC granted the proposed request by letter dated November 29, 2004.
The purpose of this letter is to document a discrepancy discovered in the November 29, 2004 letter. Contrary to the statement in the November 29, 2004 letter that "the original backup path would no longer be credited as part of the licensing basis, although it would remain as a third optionprocedurally[emphasis added]," the original backup path is no longer an option in the DBNPS emergency operating procedure. This discrepancy was discovered and entered into the DBNPS corrective action program in November 2005. FENOC has been unable to determine the origin of the discrepant statement; the statement has not been found in the aforementioned docketed correspondence associated with the exemption request.
Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 Page 2 As described in the February 13, 2004 letter, FENOC elected to install the HLI method because it is simpler in design, easier to implement, and has fewer single-failure vulnerabilities than the previous methodology. Because the DHDL method is susceptible to more points of single failure vulnerability, it would not add additional defense-in-depth, and has not been retained in the emergency operating procedure. Single failures that would render the credited methods unavailable would also disable the DHDL method.
As discussed in a conference call with the NRC staff on November 15, 2005, FENOC's opinion is that the discrepant statement was not likely a central consideration as to the NRC decision to approve the amended exemption. In a follow-up conversation on January 30, 2006, the NRC staff recommended that FENOC send in a docketed letter describing the issue and the circumstances. This letter satisfies the NRC recommendation and requests no additional action. , Commitment List, identifies that there are no commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr.
Gregory A. Dunn, Manager - FENOC Fleet Licensing, at (330) 315-7243.
Ja*cll. B~ezilla, Vice President-Nuclear MKL Attachment cc: Regional Administrator, NRC Region III NRC/NRR Project Manager NRC Senior Resident Inspector Utility Radiological Safety Board
Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 3269 Page 1 of I COMMITMENT LIST The following list identifies those actions committed to by the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit Number 1, (DBNPS) in this document. Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions by the DBNPS. They are described only for information and are not regulatory commitments. Please notify Gregory A. Dunn, Manager -
FENOC Fleet Licensing (330)-315-7243 of any questions regarding this document or associated regulatory commitments.
COMMITMENTS DUE DATE None N/A