ML071640218: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:HearingDocket | {{#Wiki_filter:HearingDocket - Re: Shearon Harrs oral argument 11-1-1111-111-1111:1 7-- k a, a9-- | ||
-Re: Shearon Harrs oral argument | "e-f 1l From: "John Runkle" <jrunkle@mindspring.com> | ||
To: "Ann Young" <AMY@nrc.gov>, <mignerey@ | To: "Ann Young" <AMY@nrc.gov>, <mignerey@ mail.umd.edu>, <jim@NCWARN.org>, | ||
mail.umd.edu>, <jim@NCWARN.org>,<pgunter@nirs.org>, "Alice Mignerey" <ACM3@nrc.gov>, "Debra Wolf" <dawl @nrc.gov>, "David Roth"<DER@nrc.gov>, "HearingDocket" <HearingDocket@ | <pgunter@nirs.org>, "Alice Mignerey" <ACM3@nrc.gov>, "Debra Wolf" <dawl @nrc.gov>, "David Roth" | ||
nrc.gov>, "Karen Valloch" <KSV@nrc.gov>,<OCAAMAIL@nrc.gov>, "Peter Lam" <PSL@nrc.gov>, "SECY" <SECY@nrc.gov>, "Sherwin Turk"<SET @ nrc.gov>, "SherVerne Cloyd" <SRC2 @ nrc.gov>, <David.Lewis | <DER@nrc.gov>, "HearingDocket" <HearingDocket@ nrc.gov>, "Karen Valloch" <KSV@nrc.gov>, | ||
@ Pillsburylaw.com>,<John.O'Neill | <OCAAMAIL@nrc.gov>, "Peter Lam" <PSL@nrc.gov>, "SECY" <SECY@nrc.gov>, "Sherwin Turk" | ||
@ Pillsburylaw.com> | <SET @ nrc.gov>, "SherVerne Cloyd" <SRC2 @nrc.gov>, <David.Lewis @Pillsburylaw.com>, | ||
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2007 11:30 AM | <John.O'Neill @Pillsburylaw.com> | ||
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2007 11:30 AM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Shearon Harris oral argument I am available on the July 17 for oral argument. | Re: Shearon Harris oral argument I am available on the July 17 for oral argument. The only conflict I know of with a limited appearance session on July 16 in the evening is the regular meeting of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners (Chatham County has jurisdiction within the 10 mile EPZ). I suggest that we may want to carry over the limited appearance session for an hour on July 17 to accommodate those who need to attend that meeting. DOCKETED USNRC FOR THE PETITIONERS June 12, 2007 (11:30am) | ||
The only conflict I know of with a limited appearance session on July 16 in the evening is the regular meeting of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners (Chatham County has jurisdiction within the 10 mile EPZ). I suggest that we may want to carry over the limited appearance session for an hour on July 17 to accommodate those who need to attend that meeting. DOCKETED USNRC FOR THE PETITIONERS June 12, 2007 (11:30am)John D. Runkle Attorney at Law OFFICE OF SECRETARY POBoxney 379 LaRULEMAKINGS | John D. Runkle Attorney at Law OFFICE OF SECRETARY POBoxney 379 LaRULEMAKINGS P.O. Box 3793 ADJUDICATIONS AND STAFF Chapel Hill, NC 27515 919-942-0600 (o&f) Docket No. 50-400-LR jrunkle@ mindspring.com RAS No. 13754 | ||
To: <mignerey@ | ----- Original Message ----- | ||
mail.umd.edu>; | From: "Ann Young" <AMY@nrc.gov> | ||
<jrunkle@mindspring.com>; | To: <mignerey@ mail.umd.edu>; <jrunkle@mindspring.com>; <jim @NCWARN.org>; | ||
<jim @ NCWARN.org>; | <pgunter@ nirs.org>; "Alice Mignerey" <ACM3 @nrc.gov>; "Ann Young" | ||
<pgunter@ | <AMY@nrc.gov>; "Debra Wolf" <dawl @nrc.gov>; "David Roth" <DER@nrc.gov>; | ||
nirs.org>; "Alice Mignerey" <ACM3 @ nrc.gov>; "Ann Young"<AMY@nrc.gov>; "Debra Wolf" <dawl @nrc.gov>; "David Roth" <DER@nrc.gov>;"HearingDocket" <HearingDocket@ | "HearingDocket" <HearingDocket@ nrc.gov>; "Karen Valloch" <KSV@ nrc.gov>; | ||
nrc.gov>; "Karen Valloch" <KSV@ nrc.gov>;<OCAAMAIL@ | <OCAAMAIL@ nrc.gov>; "Peter Lam" <PSL@nrc.gov>; "SECY" <SECY@nrc.gov>; | ||
nrc.gov>; "Peter Lam" <PSL@nrc.gov>; "SECY" <SECY@nrc.gov>;"Sherwin Turk" <SET@nrc.gov>; "SherVerne Cloyd" <SRC2@nrc.gov>; | "Sherwin Turk" <SET@nrc.gov>; "SherVerne Cloyd" <SRC2@nrc.gov>; | ||
<David.Lewis | <David.Lewis @Pillsburylaw.com>; <John.O'Neill @ Pillsburylaw.com> | ||
@ Pillsburylaw.com>; | Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:06 AM | ||
<John.O'Neill | |||
@ Pillsburylaw.com> | |||
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:06 AM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Shearon Harris oral argument Parties: Yesterday, in consideration of Staff counsel's request for a date of July 19 or later for oral argument, I sent an email asking about July 19 as a possible date. However, I was not aware when I sent the earlier email that one of the board members will not be available on that date.Thus, it will be necessary to hold the argument on July 17, and I will issue an order to this effect in the near future. We regret that this will inconvenience staff counsel, but we have not been able to find another date that will work, and counsel has indicated that this is possible for them, which we appreciate. | Shearon Harris oral argument Parties: | ||
Yesterday, in consideration of Staff counsel's request for a date of July 19 or later for oral argument, I sent an email asking about July 19 as a possible date. However, I was not aware when I sent the earlier email that one of the board members will not be available on that date. | |||
Thus, it will be necessary to hold the argument on July 17, and I will issue an order to this effect in the near future. We regret that this will inconvenience staff counsel, but we have not been able to find another date that will work, and counsel has indicated that this is possible for them, which we appreciate. | |||
In setting the limited appearance session, we are inclined toward the evening of July 16 for this, but if it would make a significant difference to hold it on the evening of July 17, we can probably do this. Please let us know your preferences. | In setting the limited appearance session, we are inclined toward the evening of July 16 for this, but if it would make a significant difference to hold it on the evening of July 17, we can probably do this. Please let us know your preferences. | ||
T-re cd eiF- 0L4'- | T-re cd eiF- 3 0L4'- | ||
-Re: hearon Harris oral argument Page 2 I Finally, I think that the email service list is correct, but please advise if this is not true.Thank you.Judge Young Q:\temp\GWJ00001.TMP c:\temp\G W}OOOO1 TM P Page1~Mail Envelope Properties (466EBBFF.6D7 | |||
: 16: 38615) | earingDoocket - Re: hearon Harris oral argument Page 2 I Finally, I think that the email service list is correct, but please advise if this is not true. | ||
Thank you. | |||
Judge Young | |||
Q:\temp\GWJ00001.TMP c:\temp\G W}OOOO1 TM P Page1~ | |||
Mail Envelope Properties (466EBBFF.6D7 : 16: 38615) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Shearon Harris oral argument Creation Date Tue, Jun 12, 2007 11:28 AM From: "John Runkle" <irunkle@mindspring.com> | Re: Shearon Harris oral argument Creation Date Tue, Jun 12, 2007 11:28 AM From: "John Runkle" <irunkle@mindspring.com> | ||
Created By: jrunkle@mindspring.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDOO1 AMY (Ann Young)daw 1 (Debra Wolf)KSV (Karen Valloch)OCAAMAIL nrc.gov TWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOO1 ACM3 (Alice Mignerey)PSL (Peter Lam)nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 DER (David Roth)nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 HearingDocket (HearingDocket HearingDocket) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY SECY)SET (Sherwin Turk)nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 SRC2 (SherVerne Cloyd)Pillsburylaw.com John.O'Neill David.Lewis nirs.org pgunter c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Pg Pa'g'e-ý11 NCWARN.org jim mail.umd.edu mignerey Post Office TWGWPO04.HQGWDOO1 TWGWPO01 .HQGWDOO1 TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 OWGWPOO2.HQGWDO01 | Created By: jrunkle@mindspring.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDOO1 AMY (Ann Young) daw 1 (Debra Wolf) | ||
Return Notification: | KSV (Karen Valloch) | ||
Concealed | OCAAMAIL nrc.gov TWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOO1 ACM3 (Alice Mignerey) | ||
PSL (Peter Lam) nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 DER (David Roth) nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 HearingDocket (HearingDocket HearingDocket) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY SECY) | |||
SET (Sherwin Turk) nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 SRC2 (SherVerne Cloyd) | |||
Pillsburylaw.com John.O'Neill David.Lewis nirs.org pgunter | |||
c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Pg Pa'g'e-ý11 NCWARN.org jim mail.umd.edu mignerey Post Office Route TWGWPO04.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov TWGWPO01 .HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDbo1 nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Pillsburylaw.com nirs.org NCWARN.org mail.umd.edu Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2164 Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:28 AM Mime.822 4390 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Security: | No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}} |
Revision as of 06:24, 23 November 2019
ML071640218 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Harris ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/12/2007 |
From: | Runkle J - No Known Affiliation, Conservation Council of North Carolina |
To: | Cloyd S, Lam P, Doris Lewis, Mignerey A, Roth D, Sherwin Turk, Valloch K, Wolf D, Austin Young Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, NRC/OGC, NRC/SECY/RAS, Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP |
SECY RAS | |
References | |
50-400-LR, RAS 13754 | |
Download: ML071640218 (4) | |
Text
HearingDocket - Re: Shearon Harrs oral argument 11-1-1111-111-1111:1 7-- k a, a9--
"e-f 1l From: "John Runkle" <jrunkle@mindspring.com>
To: "Ann Young" <AMY@nrc.gov>, <mignerey@ mail.umd.edu>, <jim@NCWARN.org>,
<pgunter@nirs.org>, "Alice Mignerey" <ACM3@nrc.gov>, "Debra Wolf" <dawl @nrc.gov>, "David Roth"
<DER@nrc.gov>, "HearingDocket" <HearingDocket@ nrc.gov>, "Karen Valloch" <KSV@nrc.gov>,
<OCAAMAIL@nrc.gov>, "Peter Lam" <PSL@nrc.gov>, "SECY" <SECY@nrc.gov>, "Sherwin Turk"
<SET @ nrc.gov>, "SherVerne Cloyd" <SRC2 @nrc.gov>, <David.Lewis @Pillsburylaw.com>,
<John.O'Neill @Pillsburylaw.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2007 11:30 AM
Subject:
Re: Shearon Harris oral argument I am available on the July 17 for oral argument. The only conflict I know of with a limited appearance session on July 16 in the evening is the regular meeting of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners (Chatham County has jurisdiction within the 10 mile EPZ). I suggest that we may want to carry over the limited appearance session for an hour on July 17 to accommodate those who need to attend that meeting. DOCKETED USNRC FOR THE PETITIONERS June 12, 2007 (11:30am)
John D. Runkle Attorney at Law OFFICE OF SECRETARY POBoxney 379 LaRULEMAKINGS P.O. Box 3793 ADJUDICATIONS AND STAFF Chapel Hill, NC 27515 919-942-0600 (o&f) Docket No. 50-400-LR jrunkle@ mindspring.com RAS No. 13754
Original Message -----
From: "Ann Young" <AMY@nrc.gov>
To: <mignerey@ mail.umd.edu>; <jrunkle@mindspring.com>; <jim @NCWARN.org>;
<pgunter@ nirs.org>; "Alice Mignerey" <ACM3 @nrc.gov>; "Ann Young"
<AMY@nrc.gov>; "Debra Wolf" <dawl @nrc.gov>; "David Roth" <DER@nrc.gov>;
"HearingDocket" <HearingDocket@ nrc.gov>; "Karen Valloch" <KSV@ nrc.gov>;
<OCAAMAIL@ nrc.gov>; "Peter Lam" <PSL@nrc.gov>; "SECY" <SECY@nrc.gov>;
"Sherwin Turk" <SET@nrc.gov>; "SherVerne Cloyd" <SRC2@nrc.gov>;
<David.Lewis @Pillsburylaw.com>; <John.O'Neill @ Pillsburylaw.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:06 AM
Subject:
Shearon Harris oral argument Parties:
Yesterday, in consideration of Staff counsel's request for a date of July 19 or later for oral argument, I sent an email asking about July 19 as a possible date. However, I was not aware when I sent the earlier email that one of the board members will not be available on that date.
Thus, it will be necessary to hold the argument on July 17, and I will issue an order to this effect in the near future. We regret that this will inconvenience staff counsel, but we have not been able to find another date that will work, and counsel has indicated that this is possible for them, which we appreciate.
In setting the limited appearance session, we are inclined toward the evening of July 16 for this, but if it would make a significant difference to hold it on the evening of July 17, we can probably do this. Please let us know your preferences.
T-re cd eiF- 3 0L4'-
earingDoocket - Re: hearon Harris oral argument Page 2 I Finally, I think that the email service list is correct, but please advise if this is not true.
Thank you.
Judge Young
Q:\temp\GWJ00001.TMP c:\temp\G W}OOOO1 TM P Page1~
Mail Envelope Properties (466EBBFF.6D7 : 16: 38615)
Subject:
Re: Shearon Harris oral argument Creation Date Tue, Jun 12, 2007 11:28 AM From: "John Runkle" <irunkle@mindspring.com>
Created By: jrunkle@mindspring.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDOO1 AMY (Ann Young) daw 1 (Debra Wolf)
KSV (Karen Valloch)
OCAAMAIL nrc.gov TWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOO1 ACM3 (Alice Mignerey)
PSL (Peter Lam) nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 DER (David Roth) nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 HearingDocket (HearingDocket HearingDocket) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY SECY)
SET (Sherwin Turk) nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 SRC2 (SherVerne Cloyd)
Pillsburylaw.com John.O'Neill David.Lewis nirs.org pgunter
c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Pg Pa'g'e-ý11 NCWARN.org jim mail.umd.edu mignerey Post Office Route TWGWPO04.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov TWGWPO01 .HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDbo1 nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Pillsburylaw.com nirs.org NCWARN.org mail.umd.edu Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2164 Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:28 AM Mime.822 4390 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled