Information Notice 2008-20, Failures of Motor Operated Valve Actuator Motors with Magnesium Alloy Rotors

Failures of Motor Operated Valve Actuator Motors with Magnesium Alloy Rotors

ML082840609
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/08/2008
From:	Dan Dorman NRC/NMSS/FCSS
To:
Beaulieu, David, NRR/DPR/PGCB, 415-3243
References
IN-08-020
Download: ML082840609 (5)

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 December 8, 2008 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2008-20: FAILURES OF MOTOR OPERATED VALVE

ACTUATOR MOTORS WITH MAGNESIUM

ALLOY ROTORS

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have

permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed

from the reactor vessel, as well as licensees and certificate holders of nuclear fuel cycle

facilities.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform

addressees of recent failures and corrective actions for motor-operated valve (MOV) actuator

motors due to corrosion of the magnesium alloy rotors. The NRC expects recipients to review

the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid

similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements;

therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

The NRC continues to inform the industry of the potential for MOV actuator motor magnesium

alloy rotors to corrode and subsequently fail under certain conditions. The NRC issued two

previous INs to alert the industry of this problem. Technical information in the previous INs is

not repeated in this IN.

The following are instances in 2007 where MOVs with actuator motors manufactured with

magnesium alloy rotors did not operate on demand due to motor failure:

River Bend, Unit 1

On May 25, 2007, at River Bend, Unit 1, the reactor inlet heater A outboard motor operated

isolation valve failed to operate due to magnesium alloy rotor corrosion that was attributed to a

steam leak from an adjacent main steam shutoff valve. This main steam shutoff valve, which

also was an MOV with a magnesium alloy rotor, failed to operate approximately four months

later on September 29, 2007. Licensee corrective actions for these MOV failures included

identifying the MOV actuator motors susceptible to this failure mechanism and performing

borescope inspections of the susceptible actuator motors. Eight MOV motors at River Bend

were replaced because the motor inspections failed the inspection criteria.

Quad Cities, Unit 1 On September 4, 2007, at Quad Cities, Unit 1, the high-pressure coolant injection (HPCI)

primary containment isolation valve failed to operate. The motor for this valve was installed in

1994. The packing on this valve catastrophically failed in 2002 resulting in high-pressure steam

in the immediate area of the motor for several hours. The motor experienced two planned stall

events while placing that valve on its backseat in an attempt to mitigate the packing leak. Motor

control center testing had been completed in May 2006 with no issues identified. Quarterly

inservice tests did not identify any degradation. Licensee corrective actions included improving

the procedures, training, and equipment used to perform borescope inspections of susceptible

actuator motors.

Dresden, Unit 3

On September 12, 2007, at Dresden Unit 3, the HPCI primary containment isolation valve failed

to operate. The motor, installed in 2002, is located in the upper drywell where temperatures are

approximately 180 ºFahrenheit (F) [82 ºCelsius (C)]. The licensee performed a borescope

inspection of the valve in 2006 with no issues identified. Licensee corrective actions included

improving the procedures, training, and equipment used to perform borescope inspections of

susceptible actuator motors. The licensee replaced four MOV motors at Dresden, Unit 2, in

November 2007 because the borescope inspection of the motors failed the inspection criteria.

BACKGROUND

Many safety- and non-safety-related MOVs utilize Limitorque actuators with Reliance motors or

a similarly styled design by a different manufacturer (e.g., Electric Apparatus). Based on torque

requirements, aluminum and magnesium alloy rotors are utilized in MOV actuators. Valve

actuators with a motor maximum torque of 40 foot-pounds [54 newton-meters] are typically

aluminum, and magnesium alloy rotors are used for applications requiring greater than 60 foot- pounds [81 newton-meters] torque. Flowserve Technical Update 06-01, dated December 26,

2006, states that Limitorque actuator frame sizes 180 and larger are typically constructed with

magnesium alloy rotors. However, one licensee identified that its facility contained Limitorque

actuator frame sizes 56 and larger that were manufactured with magnesium alloy rotors.

Flowserve Technical Update 06-01 also states that it is Limitorques intention (where possible)

to replace the remaining magnesium alloy rotor designs with an aluminum alloy rotor design in

order to eliminate the failure mechanism.

The magnesium alloy rotor bars, end rings, and cooling fins are an integral structure cast

through the iron lamination stack. The rotor assembly is painted to prevent corrosion. The

magnesium alloy (nominal 90 percent magnesium - 10 percent aluminum) has a linear thermal

expansion coefficient that is double the coefficient for iron. High inrush current heats the motor

internals causing the temperature of the rotor assembly to increase. An MOV motor stall event

is an example of a condition that creates a high current inrush to the motor. Although the rotor

assembly is painted to limit corrosion, the paint bridging the intersection of the rotor end ring

and iron lamination would be stressed by differential thermal expansion between the rotor and

iron laminations. Magnesium is an active metal and is anodic to iron. Any gaps, scratches, or

cracks in the coating will expose any unprotected areas to atmospheric conditions. Bare magnesium surfaces are subject to general and galvanic corrosion in the presence of water

(such as through high humidity, steam or condensation). Corrosion can cause a magnesium

alloy rotor assembly to degrade, which can lead to sudden motor failure.

The following NRC and industry generic communications address MOV actuator motor failures

due to the corrosion of the magnesium alloy rotor:

General Electric (GE) Service Information Letter (SIL) 425, dated July 17, 1985: This

SIL recommended that licensees determine the plant-specific applications of magnesium

alloy rotors subject to harsh environment, and evaluate the adequacy of long-term

cooling assuming failure of magnesium alloy rotor MOVs a few days after the design

basis event (DBE). Some systems may allow for the operator to position the valve to its

safety position immediately following the DBE instead of waiting for automatic actuation, while other systems may require realignment to a standby mode after initial core cooling.

In addition to operator training, it may be prudent to disconnect some of the valve

actuation logic following safety position actuation to prevent valve realignment without

operator actions.

NRC IN 86-02, Failure of Valve Operator Motor during Environmental Qualification

Testing, dated January 6, 1986: This IN described the results of the GE environmental

qualification laboratory tests on three motors in response to issues at the River Bend

and Nine Mile Point nuclear power stations. GE tested-to-failure three new motors in

varying environmental conditions, with the most limiting failure being a new motor which

failed after 43 days in a high temperature environment under a maximum temperature of

223 ºF [106 ºC]. The NRC suggested that licensees review the qualification of these

motors in their DBE applications.

NRC IN 2006-26, Failure of Magnesium Rotors in Motor-Operated Valve Actuators, dated November 20, 2006: This IN discussed three MOV actuator failures attributed to

the corrosion of the magnesium alloy motor rotors that occurred in 2005 and 2006. The

IN reaffirms the necessity of adequate inspection and preventive maintenance on MOV

actuator motors manufactured with magnesium alloy rotors to ensure safe operation of

nuclear power facilities.

DISCUSSION

Licensees rely on MOVs being operable to satisfy many technical specification requirements. In

addition, MOVs are used in systems credited in accident analyses. Because licensees often

use MOVs of the same type and manufacturers in redundant trains of several safety systems, MOV actuator failures due to magnesium alloy rotor corrosion raises the possibility of a common

mode failure. Many MOVs are within the scope of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel

Reprocessing Plants.

The industry has issued several licensee event reports and a number of operational experience

reports describing failure of safety-related MOVs to operate due to corrosion of the magnesium

alloy rotor. This is the third IN that the NRC has issued to alert the industry of this problem. Despite industry awareness of the problem and subsequent corrective measures, failures of

MOV actuators attributed to the corrosion of the magnesium alloy rotors continue to occur.

GENERIC IMPLICATIONS

NRC has initiated discussions with stakeholders to address the generic implications of MOV

actuator motors susceptible to the corrosion of the magnesium alloy rotor. Specifically, these

discussions involve the extent and effectiveness efforts by all licensees to identify and inspect

susceptible safety-related MOV actuator motors, and take corrective actions. An important part

of these discussions is licensee evaluations of GE SIL 425.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this

matter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Theodore R. Quay for /RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director Daniel H. Dorman, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Steve Tingen, NRR

301-415-1280

E-mail: Steve.Tingen@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. Despite industry awareness of the problem and subsequent corrective measures, failures of

MOV actuators attributed to the corrosion of the magnesium alloy rotors continue to occur.

GENERIC IMPLICATIONS

NRC has initiated discussions with the industry to address the generic implications of MOV

actuator motors susceptible to the corrosion of the magnesium alloy rotor. Specifically, these

discussions involve the extent and effectiveness efforts by all licensees to identify and inspect

susceptible safety-related MOV actuator motors, and take corrective actions. An important part

of these discussions is licensee evaluations of GE SIL 425.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this

matter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Theodore R. Quay for /RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director Daniel H. Dorman, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Steve Tingen, NRR

301-415-1280

E-mail: Steve.Tingen@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.

Distribution: IN Reading File

ADAMS Accession Number: ML082840609 *Concurred via email ** with comments

OFFICE DCI:CPTB TECH EDITOR* BC:DCI:CPTB D:DCI BC:DE:EEEB

NAME STingen HSpencer JMcHale MEvans GWilson

DATE 10/27/08 10/14/08 10/28/08 11/06/08 10/30/08 **

OFFICE PGCB:DPR PGCB:DPR BC:PGCB:DPR D:DPR D:NMSS:FCSS

NAME DBeaulieu CHawes MMurphy TMcGinty TRQ for DDorman

SStuchell for

DATE 11/21/08 11/13/08 12/02/08 12/8/08 12/03/08 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY