ML15301A255: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:S'En tergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 October 21, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
{{#Wiki_filter:S'En         tergy                                                                     Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 October 21, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No.MF6362)Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35  
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No.
MF6362)
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35


==REFERENCE:==
==REFERENCE:==
NRC Email to Entergy, "Request for Information Regarding Pilgrim Relief Request (PRR)-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No.
MF6362), dated September 23, 2015 LETTER NUMBER:          2.15.073


NRC Email to Entergy, "Request for Information Regarding Pilgrim Relief Request (PRR)-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No.MF6362), dated September 23, 2015 LETTER NUMBER: 2.15.073  
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
 
Pursuant to the request by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff for additional information contained in the Reference, please find attached the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station response.
Please contact me at (508) 830-8323 or Murray Williams at (508) 830-8275 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, EveretP (Cip          *C--i"rs M a nager," Regulatonryssuranc EPP/mew Attachments:      1. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No. MF6362)
: 2. Entergy Calculation M1 396, Structural Integrity Associates, "Evaluation of Probability of Failure for Recirculation Inlet (N2) in the Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Blend Radii Regions at Pilgrim Nuclear Station,"
1400071.301, Revision 0, February 2014
                                    ,%
 
Letter Number: 2.15.073 Page 2 of 2 cc:    Mr. Daniel Dorman Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 Ms. Booma Venkataraman, Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS O-8C2A Washington, DC 20555 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
 
Attachment 1 To PNPS Letter 2.15.073 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No. MF6362)
(1 Page)


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST NO. PRR-50, IMPLEMENTATION OF CODE CASE N-702 (TAC NO. MF6362)
Pursuant to the request by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff for additional information contained in the Reference, please find attached the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station response.Please contact me at (508) 830-8323 or Murray Williams at (508) 830-8275 if you have any questions.
NRC Request 1 By letter dated June 4, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15166A037), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted pursuant to Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.55(z)(1 ) a request for an alternative to specific portions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Sincerely, EveretP (Cip  M a nag er," Regul atonryssuranc EPP/mew Attachments:
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," on the basis that the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable level of quality and safety for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS). Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested approval to implement the alternative of Code Case N-702 in lieu of the code required 100% examination of all nozzles identified in the request.
: 1. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No. MF6362)2. Entergy Calculation M1 396, Structural Integrity Associates, "Evaluation of Probability of Failure for Recirculation Inlet (N2) in the Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Blend Radii Regions at Pilgrim Nuclear Station," 1400071.301, Revision 0, February 2014 ,%
: 1. Attachment 1 to the licensee's letter, Section 4, Page 4, "Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use", states in relevant part:
Letter Number: 2.15.073 Page 2 of 2 cc: Mr. Daniel Dorman Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 Ms. Booma Venkataraman, Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS O-8C2A Washington, DC 20555 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Attachment 1 To PNPS Letter 2.15.073 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No. MF6362)(1 Page)
Therefore, a plant specific probabilistic fracture mechanics evaluation was performed to supplement the criteria of Code Case N-702 and BWRVIP-241 in order to demonstrate that the probability of failure remains acceptable over this period of extended operation (to 60 years). This analysis was performed using the same methods as were used in BWRVIP-241, with PNPS specific fracture mechanics analyses*. The results demonstrate that for the N2 nozzles at PNPS, the probability of failure was less than the NRC safety goal of 5.0 x 1 0- per year. Therefore, the probabilistic fracture mechanics criteria of BWRVIP-241 remain applicable to the PNPS N2 nozzles.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST NO. PRR-50, IMPLEMENTATION OF CODE CASE N-702 (TAC NO. MF6362)NRC Request 1 By letter dated June 4, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15166A037), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee)submitted pursuant to Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.55(z)(1 ) a request for an alternative to specific portions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," on the basis that the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable level of quality and safety for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS). Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1  
*The PNPS specific reference document for this statement is cited as Structural Integrity Associates, "Evaluation of Probability of Failure for Recirculation Inlet (N2) in the Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Blend Radii Regions at Pilgrim Nuclear Station", 1400071 .301, Revision 0, February 2014.
), the licensee requested approval to implement the alternative of Code Case N-702 in lieu of the code required 100% examination of all nozzles identified in the request.1. Attachment 1 to the licensee's letter, Section 4, Page 4, "Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use", states in relevant part: Therefore, a plant specific probabilistic fracture mechanics evaluation was performed to supplement the criteria of Code Case N-702 and BWRVIP-241 in order to demonstrate that the probability of failure remains acceptable over this period of extended operation (to 60 years). This analysis was performed using the same methods as were used in BWRVIP-241, with PNPS specific fracture mechanics analyses*.
The above reference document was not provided with the submittal. Please provide the reference document in order for NRC to review the probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis of the N2 nozzles at PNPS under this relief request, PRR-50.
The results demonstrate that for the N2 nozzles at PNPS, the probability of failure was less than the NRC safety goal of 5.0 x 1 0- per year. Therefore, the probabilistic fracture mechanics criteria of BWRVIP-241 remain applicable to the PNPS N2 nozzles.*The PNPS specific reference document for this statement is cited as Structural Integrity Associates, "Evaluation of Probability of Failure for Recirculation Inlet (N2) in the Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Blend Radii Regions at Pilgrim Nuclear Station", 1400071 .301, Revision 0, February 2014.The above reference document was not provided with the submittal.
 
Please provide the reference document in order for NRC to review the probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis of the N2 nozzles at PNPS under this relief request, PRR-50.Response The requested document is provided in Attachment 2 to this letter.Attachment 1 -Page 1 of 1}}
===Response===
The requested document is provided in Attachment 2 to this letter.
Attachment 1 - Page 1 of 1}}

Revision as of 05:12, 31 October 2019

Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702
ML15301A255
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 10/21/2015
From: Perkins E
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15301A247 List:
References
TAC MF6362
Download: ML15301A255 (4)


Text

S'En tergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 October 21, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No.

MF6362)

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35

REFERENCE:

NRC Email to Entergy, "Request for Information Regarding Pilgrim Relief Request (PRR)-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No.

MF6362), dated September 23, 2015 LETTER NUMBER: 2.15.073

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to the request by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff for additional information contained in the Reference, please find attached the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station response.

Please contact me at (508) 830-8323 or Murray Williams at (508) 830-8275 if you have any questions.

Sincerely, EveretP (Cip *C--i"rs M a nager," Regulatonryssuranc EPP/mew Attachments: 1. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No. MF6362)

2. Entergy Calculation M1 396, Structural Integrity Associates, "Evaluation of Probability of Failure for Recirculation Inlet (N2) in the Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Blend Radii Regions at Pilgrim Nuclear Station,"

1400071.301, Revision 0, February 2014

,%

Letter Number: 2.15.073 Page 2 of 2 cc: Mr. Daniel Dorman Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 Ms. Booma Venkataraman, Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS O-8C2A Washington, DC 20555 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station

Attachment 1 To PNPS Letter 2.15.073 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request PRR-50, Implementation of Code Case N-702 (TAC No. MF6362)

(1 Page)

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST NO. PRR-50, IMPLEMENTATION OF CODE CASE N-702 (TAC NO. MF6362)

NRC Request 1 By letter dated June 4, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15166A037), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted pursuant to Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.55(z)(1 ) a request for an alternative to specific portions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," on the basis that the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable level of quality and safety for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS). Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested approval to implement the alternative of Code Case N-702 in lieu of the code required 100% examination of all nozzles identified in the request.

1. Attachment 1 to the licensee's letter, Section 4, Page 4, "Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use", states in relevant part:

Therefore, a plant specific probabilistic fracture mechanics evaluation was performed to supplement the criteria of Code Case N-702 and BWRVIP-241 in order to demonstrate that the probability of failure remains acceptable over this period of extended operation (to 60 years). This analysis was performed using the same methods as were used in BWRVIP-241, with PNPS specific fracture mechanics analyses*. The results demonstrate that for the N2 nozzles at PNPS, the probability of failure was less than the NRC safety goal of 5.0 x 1 0- per year. Therefore, the probabilistic fracture mechanics criteria of BWRVIP-241 remain applicable to the PNPS N2 nozzles.

  • The PNPS specific reference document for this statement is cited as Structural Integrity Associates, "Evaluation of Probability of Failure for Recirculation Inlet (N2) in the Nozzle-to-Shell Welds and Nozzle Blend Radii Regions at Pilgrim Nuclear Station", 1400071 .301, Revision 0, February 2014.

The above reference document was not provided with the submittal. Please provide the reference document in order for NRC to review the probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis of the N2 nozzles at PNPS under this relief request, PRR-50.

Response

The requested document is provided in Attachment 2 to this letter.

Attachment 1 - Page 1 of 1