ML15195A052

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review Pilgrim - PRR- 50 and 51, Proposed Alternative: Implementation of Code Case N-702 (PRR-50) and Implementation of BWRVIP-05 (GL 98-05) (PRR-51) (TAC Nos. MF6362 & MF6361)
ML15195A052
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 07/10/2015
From: Booma Venkataraman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Will M
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Guzman R
References
TAC MF6361, TAC MF6362
Download: ML15195A052 (2)


Text

From:

Venkataraman, Booma To:

mwill13@entergy.com Cc:

Guzman, Richard

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW PILGRIM - PRR-50 and 51, Proposed Alternative: Implementation of Code Case N-702 (PRR-50) and Implementation of BWRVIP-05 (GL 98-05) (PRR-51) (TAC NOS. MF6362 & MF6361)

Date:

Friday, July 10, 2015 4:15:00 PM

Murray, By letter dated June 4, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15166A037), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., requested pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.55a(z)(1) an alternative to specific portions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," on the basis that the proposed alternatives provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the application in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed to complete the staffs technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E.

Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934

Booma Venkataraman, P.E.

Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934