ML12199A126: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/16/2012
| issue date = 07/16/2012
| title = TS 3.1.4 Rod Group Alignment Limits and TS 3.1.7 Rod Position Indication LAR Acceptance Review (Tac. No. ME8844)
| title = TS 3.1.4 Rod Group Alignment Limits and TS 3.1.7 Rod Position Indication LAR Acceptance Review (Tac. No. ME8844)
| author name = Billoch-Colon A T
| author name = Billoch-Colon A
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee name = Hightower R
| addressee name = Hightower R

Revision as of 15:37, 28 June 2019

TS 3.1.4 Rod Group Alignment Limits and TS 3.1.7 Rod Position Indication LAR Acceptance Review (Tac. No. ME8844)
ML12199A126
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/16/2012
From: Billoch-Colon A
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Hightower R
Progress Energy Co
References
TAC ME8844
Download: ML12199A126 (2)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Billoch, Araceli Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 10:09 AM To: Hightower, Richard

Subject:

Robinson Unit 2- TS 3.1.4 Rod Group Alignment Limits and TS 3.1.7 Rod Position Indication LAR Acceptance Review (TAC. No. ME8844)

Attachments:

image001.gif

Dear Mr. Hightower,

By letter dated June 8, 2012 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12172A260), Carolina Power and Light Company, submitted a license amendment request for H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2. The proposed change would make corrections in Technical Specifications (TSs) 3.1.4 "Rod Group Alignments" and TS 3.1.7 "Rod Position Indication" to add a note that allows up to one hour soak time following substantial rod movement.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review

as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3302.

Araceli T. Billoch Colón Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Tel. 301-415-3302

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 411 Mail Envelope Properties (Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov20120716100900)

Subject:

Robinson Unit 2- TS 3.1.4 Rod Group Alignment Limits and TS 3.1.7 Rod Position Indication LAR Acceptance Review (TAC. No. ME8844) Sent Date: 7/16/2012 10:09:05 AM Received Date: 7/16/2012 10:09:00 AM From: Billoch, Araceli Created By: Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov Recipients: "Hightower, Richard" <richard.hightower@pgnmail.com> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2177 7/16/2012 10:09:00 AM image001.gif 1332

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: