ML110050116

2010 Fermi Initial License Examination - Operating Test Review Comments

ML110050116
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	08/26/2010
From:	Reeser D W Operations Branch III
To:	Detroit Edison
References
50-341/10-301
Download: ML110050116 (2)

Text

OPERATING TEST COMMENTS JPM COMMENTS

1. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-01R - Unable to setup simulator to support performance of MODE 5 Shiftly/Daily Surveillance

a. Changed from a MODE 5 to MODE 4 surveillance

b. Changed K/A from 2.1.44 to 2.1.18

c. Changed task elements due to changes in MODE to include:

i. Recording of Torus Water Level ii. Recording of RPV Flange Temperature iii. Identification abnormal indication for annunciator 3D57 iv. Identification of abnormal RHR configuration

v. Identification of abnormal SRM indication

2. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-01S

a. Changed K/A from 2.1.44 to 2.1.40 to reflect SRO nature of JPM

b. Changed SRM verification step

i. From 1 SRM below 3 cps to 2 SRMs below 3 cps ii. Included completed SRM signal to noise verification packages to be evaluated

c. Included Secondary Containment Differential Pressure Correction Tables as required material

3. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-02

a. Revised to allow use of IPCS including addition of appropriate cues

b. Revised to include data tables (information to be provided when requested); allows performance in classroom setting rather than in Simulator

4. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-03S

a. Changed task from "Assess Shutdown Risk" to "Evaluate a Temporary Change Notice" since procedure guidance for assessing risk was too generic to support a JPM.

b. Replacement JPM from bank

5. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-04R

a. Changed to RO only

b. Revised required materials to include Mock Up RWP and Survey Map

6. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-04S

a. Added new SRO only JPM to Review and approve Discharge Permit

b. Replacement JPM from bank

7. JPM No. 2010-301-AT-05S

a. Updated to reflect changes in procedure.

8. JPM No. 2010-301-CR-04

a. Included a recommended IC for setup

b. Added clarifying information to evaluator prompt and note

9. JPM No. 2010-301-CR-05

a. Added step to setup to ensure that injection path is isolated

b. Added step to un-isolate injection path

c. Included preferred level band in evaluator notes.

10. JPM No. 2010-301-CR-07

a. Added guidance for simulator operator to act as RO responsible for maintaining reactor period and ranging of IRMs

11. JPM No. 2010-301-IP-02

a. Changed valve number and fuse location to simplify access to panel

12. JPM No. 2010-301-IP-03

a. Added clarifying information for evaluator

b. Added missed step

SCENARIO COMMENTS

1. Scenario 1

a. Eliminated reactivity manipulation to shorten scenario run time

b. Increased delay time for sticking IRM to provide a more noticeable indication of failure. c. Included additional role play messages for communicator

d. Added clarification that applicants may isolate RCIC before auto isolation signal is actuated

e. Added clarifying note for CRD Flow transmitter failure

f. Added clarifying not related to exiting ATWS EOP power leg to SCRAM AOP

g. Changed mechanical vacuum pump failure from a credited component failure to simply an observation of failure

2. Scenario 2

a. Changed RR Pump trip event type from Reactivity Manipulation to Component malfunction due to insufficient time between initiation of malfunction and automatic trip of pump.

b. Added Role-Play communications

c. Revised Bypass Valve Test expected actions to include both procedurally allowed methods for reclosing valve.

d. Revised expected TS actions for failed accumulator to provide more detail

e. Added expectation for insertion of CRAM array in response to RR Pump Trip

f. Revised response actions for Feed Pump suction strainer clogging to include possibility that applicants may trip pump rather than perform a controlled shutdown of pump (power already low enough to support single pump operation due to RR pump trip response)

3. Scenario 3

a. Changed CW system rupture event ty pe from "Major" to "Component" failure.

b. Revised severity of SBFW Injection valve failure to permit some injection to ensure that response to small break LOCA is driven by containment parameters

and not RPV parameters

c. Eliminated RCIC malfunction and changed HPCI failure from a credited malfunction to recognition of failure.

d. Added Role-Play communications

e. Changed stator water cooling malfunction from TCV failure to HX fouling

f. Added clarifying information where needed.