ML12089A549: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[RIS 2004-13, Entergy Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit Ent000290, NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-13 Consideration Of Sheltering In Licensee'S Range Of Protective Action Recommendations]]
{{Adams
| number = ML12089A549
| issue date = 08/02/2004
| title = Entergy Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit ENT000290, NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-13 Consideration of Sheltering in Licensee'S Range of Protective Action Recommendations
| author name = Reis T
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ASLBP
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
| license number =
| contact person = SECY RAS
| case reference number = RAS 22120, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
| document report number = RIS-04-013
| package number = ML12089A543
| document type = Legal-Pre-Filed Exhibits
| page count = 5
}}
See also: [[followed by::RIS 2004-13]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20555-0001
August 2, 2004
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2004-13
CONSIDERATION OF SHELTERING IN LICENSEES RANGE OF
PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS
ADDRESSEES
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have
permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed
 
from the reactor vessel.
INTENT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS)
to clarify the regulatory requirement that licensees develop a range of protective actions that
 
includes sheltering for the public in the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone
(EPZ).  This RIS requires no action or written response on the part of addressees.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Section 50.47(b)(10) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) states in part that
licensees are to develop a range of protective actions for the public in the plume exposure
 
pathway EPZ.  In addition, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) states that in developing this range of
 
protective actions, consideration is to be given to sheltering, and that the guidelines for the
 
choice of protective actions be consistent with Federal guidance.
Following an inspection at Point Beach in August 2003 (ML040360104), the NRC staff
performed a review of licensee emergency plans, implementing procedures, and notification
 
forms to evaluate the extent licensees considered sheltering when recommending protective
 
actions to offsite organizations.  During the review, the NRC staff has noticed that licensee
 
emergency plans, implementing procedures and notification forms consider sheltering in one of
 
three ways: (1) sheltering as an alternative to evacuation (shelter rather than evacuate),
(2) sheltering as a supplement to evacuation (evacuate downwind sectors and shelter the
 
remaining sectors until further instructions are provided), and (3) sheltering is not considered by
 
the licensee.  The NRC staff has also noticed that some licensees have addressed sheltering
inconsistently in  their emergency plan, implementing procedures, and notification forms.  For
 
example, sheltering is considered as an alternative to evacuation in the emergency plan, but it
 
is not included as an option in the implementing procedures or on the notification form.
ML041210046
ENT000290
Submitted:  March 29, 2012
RIS 2004-13
Page 2 of 4
DISCUSSION
The decision to recommend a protective action involves a judgment in which the radiation dose
avoidance provided by the protective action is weighed in the context of the risks involved in
 
taking the action.  Since the decision will most likely be made under emergency conditions,
considerable planning is necessary to reduce the complexity of decisions required to effectively
 
protect the public at the time of an emergency.
Plant conditions are the major determining factors in developing early protective action
recommendations.  To be most effective, protective actions (evacuation or shelter) need to be
 
taken before or shortly after the start of a major radioactive release to the atmosphere.
 
According to the original version of Appendix 1, Emergency Action Level Guidelines for Nuclear
 
Power Plants, in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of
 
Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power
 
Plants, the initial protective action for a General Emergency is to shelter the population close to
 
the plant while considering the advisability of evacuation.  The guidance in the original version
 
of Appendix 1 further states that if core damage is in progress and containment failure is judged
 
to be imminent, shelter should be recommended for people in those areas that cannot be
 
evacuated before the plume arrives.  Although the original guidance was never intended to
 
imply that the appropriate initial protective action for severe accidents was to only shelter the
 
population that is near the plant, it was not explicit on this point.
Subsequently, portions of Appendix 1 were revised in Supplement 3 Criteria for Protective
Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents, to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for
 
Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in
 
Support of Nuclear Power Plants.  Revised Appendix 1 states that for a General Emergency,
the preferred initial protective action is to evacuate immediately about two miles in all directions
 
from the plant and about five miles downwind, unless other conditions make evacuation
 
dangerous.  Note 5 to Figure 1, Severe Damage or Loss of Control of Facility Public Protective
 
Actions, in Supplement 3, states that sheltering may be the appropriate action for controlled
 
releases of radioactive material from the containment, if there is assurance that the release is
 
short term (puff release) and the area near the plant cannot be evacuated before the plume
 
arrives.10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) requires that the consideration of sheltering be included in the range of
protective action recommendations consistent with Federal guidance.  In addition to the Federal
 
guidance discussed above, EPA 400-R-92-001, Manual of Protective Action Guides and
 
Protective Actions for Nuclear Accidents (EPA 400), dated May 1992, also contains information
 
on evacuation and sheltering.  Section 5.5.3, General Guidance for Evacuation and Sheltering,
states that the process of evaluating, recommending, and implementing evacuation or shelter
 
for the public is far from an exact science, particularly in view of time constraints that prevent
 
thorough analysis at the time of an emergency.  The effectiveness of evacuation and shelter can
 
be improved considerably by planning and testing.  Also, EPA 400 states that sheltering may be
 
appropriate (when available) for areas not designated for immediate evacuation because:  1) it
 
positions the public to receive additional instructions; and 2) it may provide protection equal to
 
or greater than evacuation. 
RIS 2004-13
Page 3 of 4
SUMMARY OF ISSUE
The NRC staff has identified a generic misinterpretation of the regulatory requirement to include
sheltering in a licensee's range of protective action recommendations (PARs) consistent with
 
Federal guidance.  The NRC staff has found that some emergency plans specifically state that
 
the licensee will provide only evacuation as a PAR.  In those cases, the appropriate protective
 
action recommendation consistent with Federal guidance may not be made to State and/or local
 
authorities.  Even if the licensee has established an understanding with State and local
 
authorities not to recommend a sheltering protective action, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) still requires
 
that sheltering be considered in developing the range of protective action recommendations in
 
the licensee's emergency plan.
Federal guidance states that sheltering may be the appropriate action for controlled releases of
radioactive material from the containment, if there is assurance that the release is short term
(puff release) and the area near the plant cannot be evacuated before the plume arrives.
 
Federal guidance also states that sheltering may be appropriate (when available) for areas not
 
designated for immediate evacuation because:  1) it positions the public to receive additional
 
instructions; and 2) it may provide protection equal to or greater than evacuation.  Additionally, a
 
licensee's emergency plan, implementing procedures, and notification forms need to include the
 
consideration of sheltering consistent with Federal guidance.
BACKFIT DISCUSSION
This RIS clarifies the regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) related to the need for
licensees to develop a range of protective actions (including sheltering) for the public in the
 
plume exposure pathway EPZ.  This RIS does not impose new or modified staff requirements or
 
uniquely prescribe a way to comply with the regulations, or require any action or written
 
response.  Therefore, this RIS does not constitute a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109 and the staff
 
did not perform a backfit analysis.
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTIFICATION
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the
Federal Register
because this RIS is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a
 
departure from current regulatory practice.
RIS 2004-13
Page 4 of 4
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This RIS does not request any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Robert Kahler by telephone or by
e-mail at the numbers listed below.
/RA/Terrence Reis, Acting Chief
Reactor Operations Branch
 
Division of Inspection Program Management
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contact:Robert Kahler, NSIR
(301) 415-2992
 
Email: rek@nrc.gov
Attachment:  List of Recently Issued Regulatory Issue Summaries
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
CP = Construction Permit
Attachment
RIS 2004-13
 
Page 1 of 1
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARIES
____________________________________________________________________________________Regulatory Issue  Date of
  Summary No.      Subject  IssuanceIssued to
____________________________________________________________________________________2004-12Clarification on Use of Later
Editions and Addenda to the
ASME OM Code and Section XI07/28/2004All holders of operating licenses
for nuclear power reactors except
 
those who have permanently
 
ceased operations and have
 
certified that fuel has been
 
permanently removed from the
 
reactor vessel.
2003-18, Supplement 1
Use of Nuclear Energy INSTITUTE (NEI) 99-01, Methodology for
 
Development of Emergency Action
 
Levels, Revision 4, Dated January
 
200307/13/2004All holders of operating licenses
for nuclear power reactors and
 
licensees that have permanently
 
ceased operations and have
 
certified that fuel has been
 
permanently removed from the
 
reactor vessel.2004-11Supporting Information Associated
with Requests For Withholding
 
Proprietary Information06/29/2004All submitters of proprietary
information to the Nuclear
 
Regulatory Commission.2004-10Preparation And Scheduling of
Operator Licensing Examinations06/14/2004All holders of operating licenses
for nuclear power reactors, except
 
those who have permanently
 
ceased operations and have
 
certified that fuel has been
 
permanently removed from the
 
reactor vessel. 2004-09Status on Deferral of Active
Regulation of Ground-water
 
Protection At In Situ Leach
 
Uranium Extraction Facilities06/07/2004All holders of materials licenses for
uranium and thorium recovery
 
facilities.2004-08Results of the License Termination
Rule Analysis05/28/2004All holders of operating licenses
for nuclear power reactors,
research and test reactors, as well
 
as decommissioning sites.
Note:NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
To subscribe send an e-mail to <
listproc@nrc.gov
>, no subject, and the following
command in the message portion:
subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname
}}

Revision as of 18:17, 22 January 2019

Entergy Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit ENT000290, NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-13 Consideration of Sheltering in Licensee'S Range of Protective Action Recommendations
ML12089A549
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/2004
From: Reis T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML12089A543 List:
References
RAS 22120, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 RIS-04-013
Download: ML12089A549 (5)


See also: RIS 2004-13

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

August 2, 2004

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2004-13

CONSIDERATION OF SHELTERING IN LICENSEES RANGE OF

PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have

permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed

from the reactor vessel.

INTENT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS)

to clarify the regulatory requirement that licensees develop a range of protective actions that

includes sheltering for the public in the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone

(EPZ). This RIS requires no action or written response on the part of addressees.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Section 50.47(b)(10) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) states in part that

licensees are to develop a range of protective actions for the public in the plume exposure

pathway EPZ. In addition, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) states that in developing this range of

protective actions, consideration is to be given to sheltering, and that the guidelines for the

choice of protective actions be consistent with Federal guidance.

Following an inspection at Point Beach in August 2003 (ML040360104), the NRC staff

performed a review of licensee emergency plans, implementing procedures, and notification

forms to evaluate the extent licensees considered sheltering when recommending protective

actions to offsite organizations. During the review, the NRC staff has noticed that licensee

emergency plans, implementing procedures and notification forms consider sheltering in one of

three ways: (1) sheltering as an alternative to evacuation (shelter rather than evacuate),

(2) sheltering as a supplement to evacuation (evacuate downwind sectors and shelter the

remaining sectors until further instructions are provided), and (3) sheltering is not considered by

the licensee. The NRC staff has also noticed that some licensees have addressed sheltering

inconsistently in their emergency plan, implementing procedures, and notification forms. For

example, sheltering is considered as an alternative to evacuation in the emergency plan, but it

is not included as an option in the implementing procedures or on the notification form.

ML041210046

ENT000290

Submitted: March 29, 2012

RIS 2004-13

Page 2 of 4

DISCUSSION

The decision to recommend a protective action involves a judgment in which the radiation dose

avoidance provided by the protective action is weighed in the context of the risks involved in

taking the action. Since the decision will most likely be made under emergency conditions,

considerable planning is necessary to reduce the complexity of decisions required to effectively

protect the public at the time of an emergency.

Plant conditions are the major determining factors in developing early protective action

recommendations. To be most effective, protective actions (evacuation or shelter) need to be

taken before or shortly after the start of a major radioactive release to the atmosphere.

According to the original version of Appendix 1, Emergency Action Level Guidelines for Nuclear

Power Plants, in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of

Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power

Plants, the initial protective action for a General Emergency is to shelter the population close to

the plant while considering the advisability of evacuation. The guidance in the original version

of Appendix 1 further states that if core damage is in progress and containment failure is judged

to be imminent, shelter should be recommended for people in those areas that cannot be

evacuated before the plume arrives. Although the original guidance was never intended to

imply that the appropriate initial protective action for severe accidents was to only shelter the

population that is near the plant, it was not explicit on this point.

Subsequently, portions of Appendix 1 were revised in Supplement 3 Criteria for Protective

Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents, to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for

Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in

Support of Nuclear Power Plants. Revised Appendix 1 states that for a General Emergency,

the preferred initial protective action is to evacuate immediately about two miles in all directions

from the plant and about five miles downwind, unless other conditions make evacuation

dangerous. Note 5 to Figure 1, Severe Damage or Loss of Control of Facility Public Protective

Actions, in Supplement 3, states that sheltering may be the appropriate action for controlled

releases of radioactive material from the containment, if there is assurance that the release is

short term (puff release) and the area near the plant cannot be evacuated before the plume

arrives.10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) requires that the consideration of sheltering be included in the range of

protective action recommendations consistent with Federal guidance. In addition to the Federal

guidance discussed above, EPA 400-R-92-001, Manual of Protective Action Guides and

Protective Actions for Nuclear Accidents (EPA 400), dated May 1992, also contains information

on evacuation and sheltering. Section 5.5.3, General Guidance for Evacuation and Sheltering,

states that the process of evaluating, recommending, and implementing evacuation or shelter

for the public is far from an exact science, particularly in view of time constraints that prevent

thorough analysis at the time of an emergency. The effectiveness of evacuation and shelter can

be improved considerably by planning and testing. Also, EPA 400 states that sheltering may be

appropriate (when available) for areas not designated for immediate evacuation because: 1) it

positions the public to receive additional instructions; and 2) it may provide protection equal to

or greater than evacuation.

RIS 2004-13

Page 3 of 4

SUMMARY OF ISSUE

The NRC staff has identified a generic misinterpretation of the regulatory requirement to include

sheltering in a licensee's range of protective action recommendations (PARs) consistent with

Federal guidance. The NRC staff has found that some emergency plans specifically state that

the licensee will provide only evacuation as a PAR. In those cases, the appropriate protective

action recommendation consistent with Federal guidance may not be made to State and/or local

authorities. Even if the licensee has established an understanding with State and local

authorities not to recommend a sheltering protective action, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) still requires

that sheltering be considered in developing the range of protective action recommendations in

the licensee's emergency plan.

Federal guidance states that sheltering may be the appropriate action for controlled releases of

radioactive material from the containment, if there is assurance that the release is short term

(puff release) and the area near the plant cannot be evacuated before the plume arrives.

Federal guidance also states that sheltering may be appropriate (when available) for areas not

designated for immediate evacuation because: 1) it positions the public to receive additional

instructions; and 2) it may provide protection equal to or greater than evacuation. Additionally, a

licensee's emergency plan, implementing procedures, and notification forms need to include the

consideration of sheltering consistent with Federal guidance.

BACKFIT DISCUSSION

This RIS clarifies the regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) related to the need for

licensees to develop a range of protective actions (including sheltering) for the public in the

plume exposure pathway EPZ. This RIS does not impose new or modified staff requirements or

uniquely prescribe a way to comply with the regulations, or require any action or written

response. Therefore, this RIS does not constitute a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109 and the staff

did not perform a backfit analysis.

FEDERAL REGISTER

NOTIFICATION

A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the

Federal Register

because this RIS is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a

departure from current regulatory practice.

RIS 2004-13

Page 4 of 4

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

This RIS does not request any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the

requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Robert Kahler by telephone or by

e-mail at the numbers listed below.

/RA/Terrence Reis, Acting Chief

Reactor Operations Branch

Division of Inspection Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contact:Robert Kahler, NSIR

(301) 415-2992

Email: rek@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued Regulatory Issue Summaries

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

Attachment

RIS 2004-13

Page 1 of 1

LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARIES

____________________________________________________________________________________Regulatory Issue Date of

Summary No. Subject IssuanceIssued to

____________________________________________________________________________________2004-12Clarification on Use of Later

Editions and Addenda to the

ASME OM Code and Section XI07/28/2004All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors except

those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.

2003-18, Supplement 1

Use of Nuclear Energy INSTITUTE (NEI) 99-01, Methodology for

Development of Emergency Action

Levels, Revision 4, Dated January

200307/13/2004All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors and

licensees that have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.2004-11Supporting Information Associated

with Requests For Withholding

Proprietary Information06/29/2004All submitters of proprietary

information to the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission.2004-10Preparation And Scheduling of

Operator Licensing Examinations06/14/2004All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors, except

those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel. 2004-09Status on Deferral of Active

Regulation of Ground-water

Protection At In Situ Leach

Uranium Extraction Facilities06/07/2004All holders of materials licenses for

uranium and thorium recovery

facilities.2004-08Results of the License Termination

Rule Analysis05/28/2004All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors,

research and test reactors, as well

as decommissioning sites.

Note:NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are

issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:

To subscribe send an e-mail to <

listproc@nrc.gov

>, no subject, and the following

command in the message portion:

subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname