ML15342A409: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Supplemental OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466) | Supplemental OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466) | ||
Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
Enclosure 1 contains a revised response to RAI 24 to be more consistent with guidance contained in the Emergency Operating Procedures. | Enclosure 1 contains a revised response to RAI 24 to be more consistent with guidance contained in the Emergency Operating Procedures. | ||
Enclosure 2 contains a revised procedure matrix reflecting the change and an editorial correction to mode titles contained in the footnote. | Enclosure 2 contains a revised procedure matrix reflecting the change and an editorial correction to mode titles contained in the footnote. | ||
Enclosure 3 contains revised pages for the EAL Basis Document for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3. This letter contains no regulatory commitments | Enclosure 3 contains revised pages for the EAL Basis Document for EALs MS3 , MA3, and MU3. This letter contains no regulatory commitments . ..--------------- | ||
. ..--------------- | ..:...44'-"-'4 SOUTH 16TH STREET MALL* OMAHA , NE 68102-2247 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-15-0139 Page 2 If you should have any questions regarding this submittal or require additional information , please contact Mr. Bill R. Hansher at 402-533-6894. | ||
..:...44'-"-'4 SOUTH 16TH STREET MALL* OMAHA, NE 68102-2247 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-15-0139 Page 2 If you should have any questions regarding this submittal or require additional information | |||
, please contact Mr. Bill R. Hansher at 402-533-6894. | |||
Louis P. Cortopassi Site Vice President and CNO LPC/EJP/mle | Louis P. Cortopassi Site Vice President and CNO LPC/EJP/mle | ||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
: 1. Revised OPPD Response to NRC RAI 24 Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 2. Procedure Matrix Revised Page for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 3. EAL Basis Document Revised Pages for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 c: M. L. Dapas, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4) C. F. Lyon, NRC Senior Project Manager S. M. Schneider, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4) Manager Radiation Control Program, Nebraska Health & Human Services, R & L Public Health Assurance, State of Nebraska (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4) | : 1. Revised OPPD Response to NRC RAI 24 Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 2. Procedure Matrix Revised Page for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 3. EAL Basis Document Revised Pages for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 c: M. L. Dapas, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV (w/o Enclosures 2, 3 , 4) C. F. Lyon, NRC Senior Project Manager S. M. Schneider, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4) Manager Radiation Control Program, Nebraska Health & Human Services, R & L Public Health Assurance, State of Nebraska (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4) | ||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-15-0139 Page 3 | U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-15-0139 Page 3 | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
: 1. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "License Amendment Request 14-06 to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors," | : 1. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "License Amendment Request 14-06 to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors," dated December 26, 2014 (LIC-14-0098) (ML 14365A123) | ||
dated December 26, 2014 (LIC-14-0098) | : 2. Letter from NRC (C. F. Lyon) to OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi), "Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 -Request for Additional Information Re: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated July 14, 2015 (NRC-15-061) (ML 15194A272) | ||
(ML 14365A123) | : 3. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01 , Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated September 11 , 2015 (LIC-15-0102) | ||
: 2. Letter from NRC (C. F. Lyon) to OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) | : 4. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "Supplemental OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01 , Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated November 2 , 2015 (LIC-15-0121) | ||
, "Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 -Request for Additional Information Re: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated July 14, 2015 (NRC-15-061) | LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 1 Page 1 Revised OPPD Response to NRC RAI 24 Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 1 Page2 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL SCHEME PURSUANT TO NEI 99-01. REVISION 6 OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION. UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285 By letter dated December 26, 2014 , Omaha Public Power District (OPPD , the licensee) requested approval for an emergency action level (EAL) scheme change for the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 (FCS) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 14365A123). | ||
(ML 15194A272) | OPPD proposes to revise its current EAL scheme to one based upon Revision 6 to Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-01 , "Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors," November 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12326A805), i nstead of Revision 5. The requests for additional information (RAls) listed below , in regards to Attachment 2, Enclosure 2C, "Eme r gency Action Level Basis Document ," of the submittal , are needed to support U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs continued technical review of the proposed EAL scheme change. FC-RAl-24 For ICs MU3, MA3, and MS3, please justify why the words:" ... as indicated by reactor 2%," were added to the EALs, or revise accordingly. | ||
: 3. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated September 11, 2015 (LIC-15-0102) | Relying solely on a reactor power level of 2 percent is not consistent with EOP criteria as provided by NEI 99-01, Revision 6. FC-RAl-24 Response (REVISED) | ||
: 4. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "Supplemental OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated November 2, 2015 (LIC-15-0121) | Revised to add "Reactor power is not < 2%" and "Startup rate is not negative" to the exist i ng reactor power indication to be consistent with guidance provided in EOPs. | ||
LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 1 Page 1 Revised OPPD Response to NRC RAI 24 Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 1 Page2 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL SCHEME PURSUANT TO NEI 99-01. REVISION 6 OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION. | |||
UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285 By letter dated December 26, 2014, Omaha Public Power District (OPPD, the licensee) requested approval for an emergency action level (EAL) scheme change for the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 (FCS) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 14365A123). | |||
OPPD proposes to revise its current EAL scheme to one based upon Revision 6 to Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-01 , "Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors," | |||
November 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12326A805) | |||
, | |||
, are needed to support U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs continued technical review of the proposed EAL scheme change. FC-RAl-24 For ICs MU3, MA3, and MS3, please justify why the words:" ... as indicated by reactor 2%," were added to the EALs, or revise accordingly. | |||
Relying solely on a reactor power level of 2 percent is not consistent with EOP criteria as provided by NEI 99-01, Revision | |||
Revised to add "Reactor power is not < 2%" and "Startup rate is not negative" to the | |||
LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 2 Procedure Matrix Revised Page FC 3-16 for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 I System Malfunction | LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 2 Procedure Matrix Revised Page FC 3-16 for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 I System Malfunction | ||
"' LL "' c.. 0::: (/) c: 0 ;; "' (.) =s c: E 0 0 0::: 0 i.. -c: 0 u Table M1 Control Room Parameters | "' LL "' c.. 0::: (/) c: 0 ;; "' (.) =s c: E 0 0 0::: 0 i.. -c: 0 u Table M1 Control Room Parameters | ||
Line 65: | Line 52: | ||
* In Core/Core Exit Temperature | * In Core/Core Exit Temperature | ||
* Level in at least one OTSG. | * Level in at least one OTSG. | ||
* Auxiliary Feed Water Flow MS3 Inability to shutdown the reactor causing a challenge to core cooling or RCS heat | * Auxiliary Feed Water Flow MS3 Inability to shutdown the reactor causing a challenge to core cooling or RCS heat remova l. 1 Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : 1 1 1 . Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as 1 indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
I i | I i | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND 2. All manual actions failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | * Startup rate is not negative AND 2. All manual actions failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND 3. EITHER of the following | * Startup rate is not negative AND 3. EITHER of the following cond i tions exist: a. Core exit thermocouples | ||
> 1550°F. OR b. RVLMS indicates 0.0% OR c. Once-Through-Cooling, EOP-20 HR4 in effect. Table M2 Significant Transients | > 1550°F. OR b. RVLMS indicates 0.0% OR c. Once-Through-Cooling, EOP-20 HR4 in effect. Table M2 Significant Transients | ||
* Electrical Load Rejection | * Electrical Load Rejection | ||
>25% full electrical load * | >25% full electrical load * | ||
* Reactor | * Reactor Tr i p ECCS Actuation Mode: 1 -Power Operations 2 -Hot Standby 3 -Hot Shutdown 4 -Cold Shutdown Month 20XX COLD SHUTDOWN/REFUELING MATRIX MA3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown ff]!] 1 the reactor , and subsequent manual actions taken at the reactor control consoles are not successful in shu t ting down the reactor. I Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core , and does no t include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | ||
: 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | : 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND 2. Manual actions taken at the Console Center failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | * Startup rate is not negative AND 2. Manual actions taken at the Console Center failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative MA4 UNPLANNED loss of Control Room indications for 15 minutes or longer with a significant transient in progress. ; Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: The Emergency Director should declare the event promptly upon determining that the applicable time has been exceeded, or will likely be exceeded | * Startup rate is not negative MA4 UNPLANNED loss of Control Room indications for 15 minutes or longer with a significant transient in progress. ; Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: The Emergency Director should declare the event promptly upon determining that the applicable time has been exceeded, or will likely be exceeded 1. a An UNPLANNED event results in the inability to mon i tor ANY Table M1 parameters from within the Control Room 15 minutes. AND b. ANY Table M2 transient in progress. 5 -Refueling Shutdown D -Defueled I MU3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor. I Emergency Action Levels (EAL): I Note: A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core , and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | ||
: 1. a. Automatic Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | |||
AND b. ANY Table M2 transient in progress. 5 -Refueling Shutdown D -Defueled I MU3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor. I Emergency Action Levels (EAL): I Note: A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | |||
: 1. a. Automatic Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following | |||
: | |||
* Reactor power is not< 2% | * Reactor power is not< 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND b. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. a. Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following | * Startup rate is not negative AND b. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. a. Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
: | |||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND b. EITHER of the following: | * Startup rate is not negative AND b. EITHER of the following: | ||
: 1. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. | : 1. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR .2. Subsequent automatic Trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. MU4 UNPLANNED loss of Control Room ind i cations for 15 minutes or longer. Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: The Emergency Director should declare the event promptly upon determining that the applicable time has been exceeded, or will likely be exceeded An UNPLANNED event resu l ts in the inability to monitor ANY Table M1 ! parameters from within the Control Room 15 minutes. FC 3-16 COLD SHUTDOWN/REFUELING MATRIX EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
OR .2. Subsequent automatic Trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. | |||
MU4 UNPLANNED loss of Control Room | |||
FC 3-16 COLD SHUTDOWN/REFUELING MATRIX EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | |||
LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 3 EAL Basis Document Revised Pages for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition: | LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 3 EAL Basis Document Revised Pages for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition: | ||
RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS Inability to shutdown the reactor causing a challenge to core cooling or RCS heat removal. | RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS Inability to shutdown the reactor causing a challenge to core cooling or RCS heat removal. Operating Mode Applicability: | ||
Operating Mode Applicability: | |||
1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL}: MS3 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | 1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL}: MS3 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
Line 101: | Line 80: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND 3. EITHER of the following conditions exist: Basis: a. Core exit thermocouples> | * Startup rate is not negative AND 3. EITHER of the following conditions exist: Basis: a. Core exit thermocouples> | ||
1550°F. OR b. RVLMS indicates 0.0% OR c. Once-Through-Cooling, EOP-20 HR4 in effect. This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic or manual reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, all subsequent operator manual actions, both inside and outside the Control Room including driving in control rods and boron injection, are unsuccessful, and continued power generation is challenging the capability to adequately remove heat from the core and/or the RCS. This condition will lead to fuel damage if additional mitigation actions are unsuccessful and thus warrants the declaration of a Site Area Emergency. | 1550°F. OR b. RVLMS indicates 0.0% OR c. Once-Through-Cooling, EOP-20 HR4 in effect. This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic or manual reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown , all subsequent operator manual actions, both inside and outside the Control Room including driving in control rods and boron injection, are unsuccessful, and continued power generation is challenging the capability to adequately remove heat from the core and/or the RCS. This condition will lead to fuel damage if additional mitigation actions are unsuccessful and thus warrants the declaration of a Site Area Emergency. | ||
In some instances, the emergency classification resulting from this IC/EAL may be higher than that resulting from an assessment of the plant responses and symptoms against the Recognition Category F ICs/EALs. | In some instances, the emergency classification resulting from this IC/EAL may be higher than that resulting from an assessment of the plant responses and symptoms against the Recognition Category F ICs/EALs. | ||
This is appropriate in that the Recognition Category F ICs/EALs do not address the additional threat posed by a failure to shutdown the reactor. | This is appropriate in that the Recognition Category F ICs/EALs do not address the additional threat posed by a failure to shutdown the reactor. The inclusion of this IC and EAL ensures the timely Month 20XX FC 3-89 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
The inclusion of this IC and EAL ensures the timely Month 20XX FC 3-89 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MS3 (cont) declaration of a Site Area Emergency in response to prolonged failure to shutdown the reactor. A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria. | ||
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MS3 (cont) declaration of a Site Area Emergency in response to prolonged failure to shutdown the reactor. | |||
A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria. | |||
Escalation of the emergency classification level would be via IC RG1 or FG1. Basis Reference(s): | Escalation of the emergency classification level would be via IC RG1 or FG1. Basis Reference(s): | ||
: 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SS5 Month 20XX FC 3-90 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | : 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SS5 Month 20XX FC 3-90 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
Line 112: | Line 89: | ||
RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MA3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor, and subsequent manual actions taken at the reactor control consoles are not successful in shutting down the reactor. Operating Mode Applicability: | RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MA3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor, and subsequent manual actions taken at the reactor control consoles are not successful in shutting down the reactor. Operating Mode Applicability: | ||
1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL): Note: | 1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL): Note: | ||
* A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | * A manual action is any operator action , or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | ||
: 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | : 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
Line 118: | Line 95: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative Basis: This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, and subsequent operator manual actions taken at the Console Center to shutdown the reactor are also unsuccessful. | * Startup rate is not negative Basis: This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, and subsequent operator manual actions taken at the Console Center to shutdown the reactor are also unsuccessful. | ||
This condition represents an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety of the plant. An emergency declaration is required even if the reactor is subsequently shutdown by an action taken away from the Console Center since this event entails a significant failure of the RPS. A manual action at the Console Center is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core (e.g., initiating a manual reactor trip. This action does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | This condition represents an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety of the plant. An emergency declaration is required even if the reactor is subsequently shutdown by an action taken away from the Console Center since this event entails a significant failure of the RPS. A manual action at the Console Center is any operator action, or set of actions , which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core (e.g., initiating a manual reactor trip. This action does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | ||
If this action(s) is unsuccessful | If this action(s) is unsuccessful , operators would immediately pursue addit i onal manual actions at locations away from the Console Center (e.g., locally opening breakers). Actions taken at back-panels or other locations within the Control Room , or any location outside the Control Room , are not considered to be "at the Console Center''. Month 20XX FC 3-91 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
, operators would immediately pursue | Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MA3 {cont) The plant response to the failure of an automatic or manual reactor trip will vary based upon several factors including the reactor power level prior to the event , availability of the condenser, performance of mitigation equipment and actions, other concurrent plant conditions, etc. If the failure to shutdown the reactor is prolonged enough to cause a challenge to the core cooling or RCS heat removal safety functions , the emergency classification level will escalate to a Site Area Emergency via IC MS3. Depending upon plant responses and symptoms, escalation is also possible via IC FS1. Absent the plant conditions needed to meet either IC MS3 or FS1, an Alert declaration is appropriate for this event. It is recognized that plant responses or symptoms may also require an Alert declaration in accordance with the Recognition Category F ICs; however, this IC and EAL are included to ensure a timely emergency declaration. | ||
. Actions taken at back-panels or other locations within the Control Room, or any location outside the Control Room, are not considered to be "at the Console Center''. Month 20XX FC 3-91 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | |||
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MA3 {cont) The plant response to the failure of an automatic or manual reactor trip will vary based upon several factors including the reactor power level prior to the event, availability of the condenser, performance of mitigation equipment and actions, other concurrent plant conditions, etc. If the failure to shutdown the reactor is prolonged enough to cause a challenge to the core cooling or RCS heat removal safety functions | |||
, the emergency classification level will escalate to a Site Area Emergency via IC MS3. Depending upon plant responses and symptoms, escalation is also possible via IC FS1. Absent the plant conditions needed to meet either IC MS3 or FS1, an Alert declaration is appropriate for this event. It is recognized that plant responses or symptoms may also require an Alert declaration in accordance with the Recognition Category F ICs; however, this IC and EAL are included to ensure a timely emergency declaration. | |||
A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria. | A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria. | ||
Basis Reference(s): | Basis Reference(s): | ||
: 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SA5 Month 20XX FC 3-92 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | : 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SA5 Month 20XX FC 3-92 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition: | Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition: | ||
RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor. | RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor. Operating Mode Applicability: | ||
Operating Mode Applicability: | |||
1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL): Note: MU3 | 1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL): Note: MU3 | ||
* A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | * A manual action is any operator action , or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. | ||
: 1. a. Automatic Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | : 1. a. Automatic Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND b. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. | * Startup rate is not negative AND b. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. a. Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | ||
OR 2. a. Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following: | |||
* Reactor power is not < 2% | * Reactor power is not < 2% | ||
* Startup rate is not negative AND b. EITHER of the following: | * Startup rate is not negative AND b. EITHER of the following: | ||
Basis: 1 . Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. | Basis: 1 . Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. Subsequent automatic Trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic or manual reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, and either a subsequent operator manual action taken at the Console Center or an automatic trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. This event is a precursor to a more significant condition and thus represents a potential degradation of the level of safety of the plant. Month 20XX FC 3-93 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
OR 2. Subsequent automatic Trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. | Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): EAL #1 Basis Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MU3 (cont) Following the failure on an automatic reactor trip, operators will promptly initiate manual actions at the Console Center to shutdown the reactor (e.g., initiate a manual reactor trip). If these manual actions are successful in shutting down the reactor, core heat generation will quickly fall to a level within the capabilities of the plant's decay heat removal systems. EAL#2 Basis If an initial manual reactor trip is unsuccessful, a concurrent plant condition, may lead to the generation of an automatic reactor trip signal. If a subsequent automatic trip is successful in shutting down the reactor, core heat generation will quickly fall to a level within the capabilities of the plant's decay heat removal systems. A manual action at the Console Center is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core (e.g., initiating a manual reactor trip). This action does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. Actions taken at back-panels or other locations within the Control Room, or any location outside the Control Room, are not considered to be "at the Console Center". The plant response to the failure of an automatic or manual reactor trip will vary based upon several factors including the reactor power level prior to the event, availability of the condenser, performance of mitigation equipment and actions, other concurrent plant conditions, etc. If subsequent operator manual actions taken at the Console Center are also unsuccessful in shutting down the reactor, then the emergency classification level will escalate to an Alert via IC MA3. Depending upon the plant response, escalation is also possible via IC FA1. Absent the plant conditions needed to meet either IC MA3 or FA 1, an Unusual Event declaration is appropriate for this event. A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria. | ||
This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic or manual reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, and either a subsequent operator manual action taken at the Console Center or an automatic trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. | Should a reactor trip signal be generated as a result of plant work (e.g., RPS setpoint testing), the following classification guidance should be applied. | ||
This event is a precursor to a more significant condition and thus represents a potential degradation of the level of safety of the plant. Month 20XX FC 3-93 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | * If the signal generated as a result of plant work causes a plant transient that creates a real condition that should have included an automatic reactor trip and the RPS fails to automatically shutdown the reactor, then this IC and the EALs are applicable , and should be evaluated. | ||
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): EAL #1 Basis Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MU3 (cont) Following the failure on an automatic reactor trip, operators will promptly initiate manual actions at the Console Center to shutdown the reactor (e.g., initiate a manual reactor trip). If these manual actions are successful in shutting down the reactor, core heat generation will quickly fall to a level within the capabilities of the plant's decay heat removal systems. | * If the signal generated as a result of plant work does not cause a plant transient but should have generated an RPS trip signal and the trip failure is determined through other means (e.g., assessment of test results), then th i s IC and the EALs are not applicable and no classification is warranted. | ||
EAL#2 Basis If an initial manual reactor trip is unsuccessful, a concurrent plant condition, may lead to the generation of an automatic reactor trip signal. If a subsequent automatic trip is successful in shutting down the reactor, core heat generation will quickly fall to a level within the capabilities of the plant's decay heat removal systems. A manual action at the Console Center is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core (e.g., initiating a manual reactor trip). This action does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies | |||
. Actions taken at back-panels or other locations within the Control Room, or any location outside the Control Room, are not considered to be "at the Console Center". | |||
The plant response to the failure of an automatic or manual reactor trip will vary based upon several factors including the reactor power level prior to the event, availability of the condenser, performance of mitigation equipment and actions, other concurrent plant conditions, etc. If subsequent operator manual actions taken at the Console Center are also unsuccessful in shutting down the reactor, then the emergency classification level will escalate to an Alert via IC MA3. Depending upon the plant response, escalation is also possible via IC FA1. Absent the plant conditions needed to meet either IC MA3 or FA 1, an Unusual Event declaration is appropriate for this event. A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria. | |||
Should a reactor trip signal be generated as a result of plant work (e.g., RPS setpoint testing), | |||
the following classification guidance should be applied. | |||
* If the signal generated as a result of plant work causes a plant transient that creates a real condition that should have included an automatic reactor trip and the RPS fails to automatically shutdown the reactor, then this IC and the EALs are applicable | |||
, and should be evaluated. | |||
* If the signal generated as a result of plant work does not cause a plant transient but should have generated an RPS trip signal and the trip failure is determined through other means (e.g., assessment of test results), | |||
then | |||
Month 20XX FC 3-94 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | Month 20XX FC 3-94 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX) | ||
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis Reference(s): | Ft. Calhoun Station Basis Reference(s): | ||
: 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SU5 Month 20XX Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS FC 3-95 MU3 (cont) EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)}} | : 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SU5 Month 20XX Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS FC 3-95 MU3 (cont) EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)}} |
Revision as of 18:44, 8 July 2018
ML15342A409 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Fort Calhoun |
Issue date: | 12/08/2015 |
From: | Cortopassi L P Omaha Public Power District |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
LIC-15-0139, NEI 99-01, Rev. 6, TAC MF5466 | |
Download: ML15342A409 (15) | |
Text
LIC-15-0139 December 8, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-40 NRC Docket No. 50-285 Fort Calhoun Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation NRC Docket No.72-054
Subject:
Supplemental OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)
References:
Page 3 Following a teleconference with NRC Staff on November 23, 2015, the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) is supplementing its Reference 3 response to the Reference 2 NRC request for additional information (RAI) regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 (Reference 1 ). LAR 14-06 proposes to revise the Emergency Plan for Fort Calhoun Station to adopt the Nuclear Energy lnstitute's (NEl's) revised Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme described in NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors.
Enclosure 1 contains a revised response to RAI 24 to be more consistent with guidance contained in the Emergency Operating Procedures.
Enclosure 2 contains a revised procedure matrix reflecting the change and an editorial correction to mode titles contained in the footnote.
Enclosure 3 contains revised pages for the EAL Basis Document for EALs MS3 , MA3, and MU3. This letter contains no regulatory commitments . ..---------------
..:...44'-"-'4 SOUTH 16TH STREET MALL* OMAHA , NE 68102-2247 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-15-0139 Page 2 If you should have any questions regarding this submittal or require additional information , please contact Mr. Bill R. Hansher at 402-533-6894.
Louis P. Cortopassi Site Vice President and CNO LPC/EJP/mle
Enclosures:
- 1. Revised OPPD Response to NRC RAI 24 Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 2. Procedure Matrix Revised Page for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 3. EAL Basis Document Revised Pages for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 c: M. L. Dapas, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV (w/o Enclosures 2, 3 , 4) C. F. Lyon, NRC Senior Project Manager S. M. Schneider, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4) Manager Radiation Control Program, Nebraska Health & Human Services, R & L Public Health Assurance, State of Nebraska (w/o Enclosures 2, 3, 4)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-15-0139 Page 3
References:
- 1. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "License Amendment Request 14-06 to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors," dated December 26, 2014 (LIC-14-0098) (ML 14365A123)
- 2. Letter from NRC (C. F. Lyon) to OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi), "Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 -Request for Additional Information Re: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated July 14, 2015 (NRC-15-061) (ML 15194A272)
- 3. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01 , Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated September 11 , 2015 (LIC-15-0102)
- 4. Letter from OPPD (L. P. Cortopassi) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "Supplemental OPPD Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RE: License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme Pursuant to NEI 99-01 , Revision 6 (TAC No. MF5466)," dated November 2 , 2015 (LIC-15-0121)
LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 1 Page 1 Revised OPPD Response to NRC RAI 24 Regarding License Amendment Request (LAR) 14-06 LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 1 Page2 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL SCHEME PURSUANT TO NEI 99-01. REVISION 6 OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION. UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285 By letter dated December 26, 2014 , Omaha Public Power District (OPPD , the licensee) requested approval for an emergency action level (EAL) scheme change for the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 (FCS) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 14365A123).
OPPD proposes to revise its current EAL scheme to one based upon Revision 6 to Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) document NEI 99-01 , "Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors," November 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12326A805), i nstead of Revision 5. The requests for additional information (RAls) listed below , in regards to Attachment 2, Enclosure 2C, "Eme r gency Action Level Basis Document ," of the submittal , are needed to support U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs continued technical review of the proposed EAL scheme change. FC-RAl-24 For ICs MU3, MA3, and MS3, please justify why the words:" ... as indicated by reactor 2%," were added to the EALs, or revise accordingly.
Relying solely on a reactor power level of 2 percent is not consistent with EOP criteria as provided by NEI 99-01, Revision 6. FC-RAl-24 Response (REVISED)
Revised to add "Reactor power is not < 2%" and "Startup rate is not negative" to the exist i ng reactor power indication to be consistent with guidance provided in EOPs.
LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 2 Procedure Matrix Revised Page FC 3-16 for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 I System Malfunction
"' LL "' c.. 0::: (/) c: 0 ;; "' (.) =s c: E 0 0 0::: 0 i.. -c: 0 u Table M1 Control Room Parameters
- Reactor Power
- PZR Level
- RCS Pressure
- In Core/Core Exit Temperature
- Level in at least one OTSG.
- Auxiliary Feed Water Flow MS3 Inability to shutdown the reactor causing a challenge to core cooling or RCS heat remova l. 1 Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : 1 1 1 . Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as 1 indicated by ANY of the following:
I i
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND 2. All manual actions failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND 3. EITHER of the following cond i tions exist: a. Core exit thermocouples
> 1550°F. OR b. RVLMS indicates 0.0% OR c. Once-Through-Cooling, EOP-20 HR4 in effect. Table M2 Significant Transients
- Electrical Load Rejection
>25% full electrical load *
- Reactor Tr i p ECCS Actuation Mode: 1 -Power Operations 2 -Hot Standby 3 -Hot Shutdown 4 -Cold Shutdown Month 20XX COLD SHUTDOWN/REFUELING MATRIX MA3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown ff]!] 1 the reactor , and subsequent manual actions taken at the reactor control consoles are not successful in shu t ting down the reactor. I Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core , and does no t include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies.
- 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND 2. Manual actions taken at the Console Center failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative MA4 UNPLANNED loss of Control Room indications for 15 minutes or longer with a significant transient in progress. ; Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: The Emergency Director should declare the event promptly upon determining that the applicable time has been exceeded, or will likely be exceeded 1. a An UNPLANNED event results in the inability to mon i tor ANY Table M1 parameters from within the Control Room 15 minutes. AND b. ANY Table M2 transient in progress. 5 -Refueling Shutdown D -Defueled I MU3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor. I Emergency Action Levels (EAL): I Note: A manual action is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core , and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies.
- 1. a. Automatic Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not< 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND b. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. a. Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND b. EITHER of the following:
- 1. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR .2. Subsequent automatic Trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. MU4 UNPLANNED loss of Control Room ind i cations for 15 minutes or longer. Emergency Action Levels (EAL) : Note: The Emergency Director should declare the event promptly upon determining that the applicable time has been exceeded, or will likely be exceeded An UNPLANNED event resu l ts in the inability to monitor ANY Table M1 ! parameters from within the Control Room 15 minutes. FC 3-16 COLD SHUTDOWN/REFUELING MATRIX EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
LIC-15-0139 Enclosure 3 EAL Basis Document Revised Pages for EALs MS3, MA3, and MU3 Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition:
RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS Inability to shutdown the reactor causing a challenge to core cooling or RCS heat removal. Operating Mode Applicability:
1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL}: MS3 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND 2. All manual actions failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND 3. EITHER of the following conditions exist: Basis: a. Core exit thermocouples>
1550°F. OR b. RVLMS indicates 0.0% OR c. Once-Through-Cooling, EOP-20 HR4 in effect. This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic or manual reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown , all subsequent operator manual actions, both inside and outside the Control Room including driving in control rods and boron injection, are unsuccessful, and continued power generation is challenging the capability to adequately remove heat from the core and/or the RCS. This condition will lead to fuel damage if additional mitigation actions are unsuccessful and thus warrants the declaration of a Site Area Emergency.
In some instances, the emergency classification resulting from this IC/EAL may be higher than that resulting from an assessment of the plant responses and symptoms against the Recognition Category F ICs/EALs.
This is appropriate in that the Recognition Category F ICs/EALs do not address the additional threat posed by a failure to shutdown the reactor. The inclusion of this IC and EAL ensures the timely Month 20XX FC 3-89 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MS3 (cont) declaration of a Site Area Emergency in response to prolonged failure to shutdown the reactor. A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria.
Escalation of the emergency classification level would be via IC RG1 or FG1. Basis Reference(s):
- 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SS5 Month 20XX FC 3-90 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition:
RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MA3 Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor, and subsequent manual actions taken at the reactor control consoles are not successful in shutting down the reactor. Operating Mode Applicability:
1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL): Note:
- A manual action is any operator action , or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies.
- 1. Automatic or Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND 2. Manual actions taken at the Console Center failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative Basis: This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, and subsequent operator manual actions taken at the Console Center to shutdown the reactor are also unsuccessful.
This condition represents an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety of the plant. An emergency declaration is required even if the reactor is subsequently shutdown by an action taken away from the Console Center since this event entails a significant failure of the RPS. A manual action at the Console Center is any operator action, or set of actions , which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core (e.g., initiating a manual reactor trip. This action does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies.
If this action(s) is unsuccessful , operators would immediately pursue addit i onal manual actions at locations away from the Console Center (e.g., locally opening breakers). Actions taken at back-panels or other locations within the Control Room , or any location outside the Control Room , are not considered to be "at the Console Center. Month 20XX FC 3-91 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MA3 {cont) The plant response to the failure of an automatic or manual reactor trip will vary based upon several factors including the reactor power level prior to the event , availability of the condenser, performance of mitigation equipment and actions, other concurrent plant conditions, etc. If the failure to shutdown the reactor is prolonged enough to cause a challenge to the core cooling or RCS heat removal safety functions , the emergency classification level will escalate to a Site Area Emergency via IC MS3. Depending upon plant responses and symptoms, escalation is also possible via IC FS1. Absent the plant conditions needed to meet either IC MS3 or FS1, an Alert declaration is appropriate for this event. It is recognized that plant responses or symptoms may also require an Alert declaration in accordance with the Recognition Category F ICs; however, this IC and EAL are included to ensure a timely emergency declaration.
A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria.
Basis Reference(s):
- 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SA5 Month 20XX FC 3-92 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
Ft. Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Initiating Condition:
RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS Automatic or manual trip fails to shutdown the reactor. Operating Mode Applicability:
1, 2 Emergency Action Level (EAL): Note: MU3
- A manual action is any operator action , or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core, and does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies.
- 1. a. Automatic Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND b. Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. a. Manual Trip failed to shutdown the reactor as indicated by ANY of the following:
- Reactor power is not < 2%
- Startup rate is not negative AND b. EITHER of the following:
Basis: 1 . Subsequent manual action taken at the Console Center is successful in shutting down the reactor. OR 2. Subsequent automatic Trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. This IC addresses a failure of the RPS to initiate or complete an automatic or manual reactor trip that results in a reactor shutdown, and either a subsequent operator manual action taken at the Console Center or an automatic trip is successful in shutting down the reactor. This event is a precursor to a more significant condition and thus represents a potential degradation of the level of safety of the plant. Month 20XX FC 3-93 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis (cont): EAL #1 Basis Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS MU3 (cont) Following the failure on an automatic reactor trip, operators will promptly initiate manual actions at the Console Center to shutdown the reactor (e.g., initiate a manual reactor trip). If these manual actions are successful in shutting down the reactor, core heat generation will quickly fall to a level within the capabilities of the plant's decay heat removal systems. EAL#2 Basis If an initial manual reactor trip is unsuccessful, a concurrent plant condition, may lead to the generation of an automatic reactor trip signal. If a subsequent automatic trip is successful in shutting down the reactor, core heat generation will quickly fall to a level within the capabilities of the plant's decay heat removal systems. A manual action at the Console Center is any operator action, or set of actions, which causes the control rods to be rapidly inserted into the core (e.g., initiating a manual reactor trip). This action does not include manually driving in control rods or implementation of boron injection strategies. Actions taken at back-panels or other locations within the Control Room, or any location outside the Control Room, are not considered to be "at the Console Center". The plant response to the failure of an automatic or manual reactor trip will vary based upon several factors including the reactor power level prior to the event, availability of the condenser, performance of mitigation equipment and actions, other concurrent plant conditions, etc. If subsequent operator manual actions taken at the Console Center are also unsuccessful in shutting down the reactor, then the emergency classification level will escalate to an Alert via IC MA3. Depending upon the plant response, escalation is also possible via IC FA1. Absent the plant conditions needed to meet either IC MA3 or FA 1, an Unusual Event declaration is appropriate for this event. A reactor shutdown is determined in accordance with applicable Emergency Operating Procedure criteria.
Should a reactor trip signal be generated as a result of plant work (e.g., RPS setpoint testing), the following classification guidance should be applied.
- If the signal generated as a result of plant work causes a plant transient that creates a real condition that should have included an automatic reactor trip and the RPS fails to automatically shutdown the reactor, then this IC and the EALs are applicable , and should be evaluated.
- If the signal generated as a result of plant work does not cause a plant transient but should have generated an RPS trip signal and the trip failure is determined through other means (e.g., assessment of test results), then th i s IC and the EALs are not applicable and no classification is warranted.
Month 20XX FC 3-94 EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)
Ft. Calhoun Station Basis Reference(s):
- 1. NEI 99-01 Rev 6, SU5 Month 20XX Omaha Public Power District RECOGNITION CATEGORY SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONS FC 3-95 MU3 (cont) EP-XX-XXXX (Revision XX)