ML14167A088: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Finfera, Jennifer [jennifer_finfera@fws.gov]Sent:Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:43 PMTo:Grange, Briana
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Finfera, Jennifer [jennifer_finfera@fws.gov]
Sent:Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:43 PM To:Grange, Briana


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Re: Davis Besse operating license renewalBriana, I need to talk with one of our biologist who does most of the bird work. I know that having the lights on continuous instead of flashing does help reduce bird collisions and by the information you included these collisions have been reduced. After I find out if there are any other avoidance or minimization measures I will give you a call so we can discuss this further. It will probably be next week. As I will be in the field most of the rest of this week.  
Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal Briana, I need to talk with one of our bi ologist who does most of the bird work. I know that having the lights on continuous instead of flashing doe s help reduce bird collisions and by the information you included these collisions have been reduced. Af ter I find out if there are any other avoidance or minimization measures I will give you a call so we can discuss this further. It will probably be next week. As I will be in the field most o f the rest of this week.  


Jenny  Jenny On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov> wrote: Hi Jenny,   Per your request, I have attached an assessment for the proposed long-eared bat. In the course of considering the bat, I also identified another proposed species-the red knot-that occurs in the action area. Both species are considered in the attached assessment. As you will see, I concluded "not likely to adversely affect" for the long-eared bat, but "may affect" for the red knot due to the potential for collision with plant structures. Given the "may affect" conclusion and the fact that the red knot is a proposed species at this time, I am not sure what the appropriate path forward will be. Maybe we can talk after you read the assessment? Thanks,   Briana ______________ Briana A. Grange Biologist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RERB (301) 415-1042 2briana.grange@nrc.gov        
Jenny  Jenny On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Grange, Briana <
Briana.Grange@nrc.gov
> wrote:
Hi Jenny, Per your request, I have attached an assessment for the proposed long-eared bat. In the course of considering the bat, I also identified another proposed species-the red knot-that occurs in the action area. Both species are considered in the attached assessment.
As you will see, I concluded "not likely to adversely affect" for the long-eared bat, but "may affect" for the red knot due to the potential for collision with plant structures. Given the "may affect" conclusion and the fact that the red knot is a proposed species at this time, I am not sure what the appropriate path forward will be. Maybe we can talk after you read the assessment? Thanks, Briana ______________
Briana A. Grange Biologist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RERB (301) 415-1042
 
2briana.grange@nrc.gov


--
--
Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230
Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services  


Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13 Fax:    614-416-8994
4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230


Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  1371  Mail Envelope Properties  (CAAtVZcM-b+-U3SMjSrS4iL5BCGtj-4GzV-AcOzSLugaT-mcB1A)  
Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13
 
Fax:    614-416-8994
 
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  1371  Mail Envelope Properties  (CAAtVZcM-b+-U3SMjSrS4iL5BCGtj-4GzV-AcOzSLugaT-mcB1A)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal  Sent Date:  5/6/2014 1:43:04 PM  Received Date:  5/6/2014 1:43:54 PM From:    Finfera, Jennifer Created By:  jennifer_finfera@fws.gov Recipients:    "Grange, Briana" <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>
Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal  Sent Date:  5/6/2014 1:43:04 PM  Received Date:  5/6/2014 1:43:54 PM From:    Finfera, Jennifer Created By:  jennifer_finfera@fws.gov Recipients:    "Grange, Briana" <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:  mail.gmail.com   Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1700      5/6/2014 1:43:54 PM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None  
 
Post Office:  mail.gmail.com Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1700      5/6/2014 1:43:54 PM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 14:43, 1 July 2018

2014/05/06 NRR E-mail Capture - Davis Besse Operating License Renewal
ML14167A088
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/06/2014
From: Finfera J
US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service
To: Grange B A
NRC/NRR/DLR/RERGUB
References
Download: ML14167A088 (3)
v • d • e


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Finfera, Jennifer [jennifer_finfera@fws.gov]

Sent:Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:43 PM To:Grange, Briana

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal Briana, I need to talk with one of our bi ologist who does most of the bird work. I know that having the lights on continuous instead of flashing doe s help reduce bird collisions and by the information you included these collisions have been reduced. Af ter I find out if there are any other avoidance or minimization measures I will give you a call so we can discuss this further. It will probably be next week. As I will be in the field most o f the rest of this week.

Jenny Jenny On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Grange, Briana <

Briana.Grange@nrc.gov

> wrote:

Hi Jenny, Per your request, I have attached an assessment for the proposed long-eared bat. In the course of considering the bat, I also identified another proposed species-the red knot-that occurs in the action area. Both species are considered in the attached assessment.

As you will see, I concluded "not likely to adversely affect" for the long-eared bat, but "may affect" for the red knot due to the potential for collision with plant structures. Given the "may affect" conclusion and the fact that the red knot is a proposed species at this time, I am not sure what the appropriate path forward will be. Maybe we can talk after you read the assessment? Thanks, Briana ______________

Briana A. Grange Biologist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RERB (301) 415-1042

2briana.grange@nrc.gov

--

Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services

4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230

Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13

Fax: 614-416-8994

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1371 Mail Envelope Properties (CAAtVZcM-b+-U3SMjSrS4iL5BCGtj-4GzV-AcOzSLugaT-mcB1A)

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal Sent Date: 5/6/2014 1:43:04 PM Received Date: 5/6/2014 1:43:54 PM From: Finfera, Jennifer Created By: jennifer_finfera@fws.gov Recipients: "Grange, Briana" <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

Post Office: mail.gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1700 5/6/2014 1:43:54 PM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14167A088&oldid=789820"