ML21278A253: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:14.5 LOSS OF LOAD EVENT 14.5.1 IDENTIFICATION OF EVENT AND CAUSE The primary function of the turbine stop valves (throttle valves on Unit 2) are to quickly shut off steam flow to the high pressure turbine. There are four valves in parallel off a common header which are located upstream of the turbine control valves (governor valves on Unit 2) and downstream of the MSIVs. The quick closure of the stop valves prevents overspeeding the turbine when there is a turbine trip. A turbine trip can be the result of a reactor trip, loss of electrical load, loss of condenser vacuum, low oil pressure, etc. | {{#Wiki_filter:14.5 LOSS OF LOAD EVENT 14.5.1 IDENTIFICATION OF EVENT AND CAUSE The primary function of the turbine stop valves (throttle valves on Unit 2) are to quickly shut off steam flow to the high pressure turbine. There are four valves in parallel off a common header which are located upstream of the turbine control valves (governor valves on Unit 2) and downstream of the MSIVs. The quick closure of the stop valves prevents overspeeding the turbine when there is a turbine trip. A turbine trip can be the result of a reactor trip, loss of electrical load, loss of condenser vacuum, low oil pressure, etc. | ||
A Loss of Load event is defined as any event that results in a reduction in the SGs heat removal capacity through the loss of secondary steam flow. Closure of all MSIVs, turbine stop valves, or turbine control valves will cause a Loss of Load event. Of the three types of valves in the steam lines between the SG and the high pressure turbine, the turbine stop valves have the quickest closure time. | A Loss of Load event is defined as any event that results in a reduction in the SGs heat removal capacity through the loss of secondary steam flow. Closure of all MSIVs, turbine stop valves, or turbine control valves will cause a Loss of Load event. Of the three types of valves in the steam lines between the SG and the high pressure turbine, the turbine stop valves have the quickest closure time. | ||
The most limiting Loss of Load event for primary system overpressure is a turbine trip without a concurrent reactor trip or an inadvertent closure of the turbine stop valves at HFP. A turbine trip would result in the closure of the turbine stop valves. | The most limiting Loss of Load event for primary system overpressure is a turbine trip without a concurrent reactor trip or an inadvertent closure of the turbine stop valves at HFP. A turbine trip would result in the closure of the turbine stop valves. | ||
14.5.2 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS A Loss of Load event can result in an approach to the DNBR and LHGR SAFDLs and the RCS Pressure Upset Limit. The action of the TM/LP, the Variable High Power, or the High Pressurizer Pressure Trip will prevent exceeding these limits. Since no fuel pin failures are postulated to occur, the site boundary dose criteria in the 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines will not be approached. | 14.5.2 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS A Loss of Load event can result in an approach to the DNBR and LHGR SAFDLs and the RCS Pressure Upset Limit. The action of the TM/LP, the Variable High Power, or the High Pressurizer Pressure Trip will prevent exceeding these limits. Since no fuel pin failures are postulated to occur, the site boundary dose criteria in the 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines will not be approached. | ||
The most limiting criteria for the Loss of Load event are the RCS and Secondary Pressure Upset Limit of 110% of design. Normally the non-safety grade turbine trip would initiate a reactor trip and lessen the peak pressure. In analyzing this event, no credit is allowed for this trip (Section 7.2.3.8). | The most limiting criteria for the Loss of Load event are the RCS and Secondary Pressure Upset Limit of 110% of design. Normally the non-safety grade turbine trip would initiate a reactor trip and lessen the peak pressure. In analyzing this event, no credit is allowed for this trip (Section 7.2.3.8). | ||
A Loss of Load event is initiated at HFP by the termination of steam flow to the turbine. | A Loss of Load event is initiated at HFP by the termination of steam flow to the turbine. | ||
The immediate system response is a rapid increase in SG pressure and temperature with the RCS adding heat and without any steam being extracted from the SG. To maximize the pressure and temperature increase, no credit is allowed for the Steam Dump and Bypass System (SDBS) which would reduce the pressure transient. With the SDBS inoperable, the secondary pressure will rapidly reach the SG safety valve analysis setpoints. | The immediate system response is a rapid increase in SG pressure and temperature with the RCS adding heat and without any steam being extracted from the SG. To maximize the pressure and temperature increase, no credit is allowed for the Steam Dump and Bypass System (SDBS) which would reduce the pressure transient. With the SDBS inoperable, the secondary pressure will rapidly reach the SG safety valve analysis setpoints. | ||
With the inability of the SG to remove the heat from the RCS, the RCS temperature will rapidly begin to increase. The pressurizer pressure and level will increase with the increasing RCS temperature. To maximize RCS pressure no credit is taken for the pressurizer pressure and level control system. Consequently, the pressure will rapidly approach the PORV analysis setpoint and the High Pressurizer Pressure Analysis Trip setpoint. To maximize the peak RCS pressure, no credit is taken for the action of the PORVs. | With the inability of the SG to remove the heat from the RCS, the RCS temperature will rapidly begin to increase. The pressurizer pressure and level will increase with the increasing RCS temperature. To maximize RCS pressure no credit is taken for the pressurizer pressure and level control system. Consequently, the pressure will rapidly approach the PORV analysis setpoint and the High Pressurizer Pressure Analysis Trip setpoint. To maximize the peak RCS pressure, no credit is taken for the action of the PORVs. | ||
To maximize secondary peak pressure, credit is taken for the pressurizer pressure control system. This will delay the high pressurizer pressure trip and thus add more energy to the secondary system. | To maximize secondary peak pressure, credit is taken for the pressurizer pressure control system. This will delay the high pressurizer pressure trip and thus add more energy to the secondary system. | ||
average heat flux will increase and further increase the rate of the primary system pressurization. | The analysis assumes a positive MTC which will add positive reactivity with the increasing RCS temperature. The MTC is normally negative at HFP. The core power and core | ||
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-1 Rev. 49 average heat flux will increase and further increase the rate of the primary system pressurization. | |||
A High Pressurizer Pressure Trip will be initiated when the pressure reaches the analysis setpoint. The reactor trip will terminate the core power increase after some delay reflecting RPS response, CEA holding coil, and CEA insertion time intervals. The core power will then rapidly decrease to the decay power level. The core average heat flux will follow the core power but will lag the core power due to the fuel time constant. | A High Pressurizer Pressure Trip will be initiated when the pressure reaches the analysis setpoint. The reactor trip will terminate the core power increase after some delay reflecting RPS response, CEA holding coil, and CEA insertion time intervals. The core power will then rapidly decrease to the decay power level. The core average heat flux will follow the core power but will lag the core power due to the fuel time constant. | ||
After the reactor trip, the pressurizer pressure will continue to increase and approach the PSVs' opening pressure analysis setpoint. This is caused by the above-mentioned delays and the core heat flux lagging behind the core power, which results in additional heat being added to the coolant. | After the reactor trip, the pressurizer pressure will continue to increase and approach the PSVs' opening pressure analysis setpoint. This is caused by the above-mentioned delays and the core heat flux lagging behind the core power, which results in additional heat being added to the coolant. | ||
The pressurizer pressure will peak and then start to rapidly decrease once the heat flux decays as the SGs begin removing heat through the MSSVs. Consequently, PSVs that opened will close. | The pressurizer pressure will peak and then start to rapidly decrease once the heat flux decays as the SGs begin removing heat through the MSSVs. Consequently, PSVs that opened will close. | ||
The RCS temperatures will slowly decrease and approach the saturation temperature corresponding to the lowest MSSV pressure analysis setpoint. | The RCS temperatures will slowly decrease and approach the saturation temperature corresponding to the lowest MSSV pressure analysis setpoint. | ||
14.5.3 CORE AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 14.5.3.1 Mathematical Models The NSSS response to the Loss of Load event was simulated using the S-RELAP5 computer code described in Section 14.1.4.2. | 14.5.3 CORE AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 14.5.3.1 Mathematical Models The NSSS response to the Loss of Load event was simulated using the S-RELAP5 computer code described in Section 14.1.4.2. | ||
14.5.3.2 Input Parameters and Initial Conditions The input parameters and initial conditions used in the analysis to maximize peak RCS pressure are listed in Table 14.5-1 for the present cycles of Unit 1 and Unit 2. | 14.5.3.2 Input Parameters and Initial Conditions The input parameters and initial conditions used in the analysis to maximize peak RCS pressure are listed in Table 14.5-1 for the present cycles of Unit 1 and Unit 2. | ||
The input parameters and initial conditions used in the analysis to maximize peak secondary pressure are listed in Table 14.5-3. Those parameters, which are unique to the analysis, are discussed below. | The input parameters and initial conditions used in the analysis to maximize peak secondary pressure are listed in Table 14.5-3. Those parameters, which are unique to the analysis, are discussed below. | ||
The most positive MTC was assumed. This MTC, in conjunction with the increasing coolant temperatures, maximizes the rate of change of heat flux and the pressure at the time of reactor trip. A FTC corresponding to BOC conditions was used in the analysis. This FTC causes the least amount of negative reactivity feedback to mitigate the transient increases in both the core heat flux and the pressure. The uncertainty on the FTC used in the analyses is shown in Table 14.5-1. Sensitivity studies were performed to determine the most limiting set of initial conditions, provided in Tables 14.5-1 (RCS Pressure) and 14.5-3 (Secondary Peak Pressure). Pressurizer pressure and level, SG level, RCS inlet temperature and RCS flow rate were ranged, one parameter at a time. The most limiting set of initial conditions is provided in the Tables. The lower limit on initial RCS pressure is used to maximize the rate of change of pressure, and thus peak pressure, following trips. For the case to maximize RCS peak pressure, the lower limit on Tin is assumed, which results in a lower initial second pressure, delays the opening of MSSVs, and maximizes RCS pressure. | The most positive MTC was assumed. This MTC, in conjunction with the increasing coolant temperatures, maximizes the rate of change of heat flux and the pressure at the time of reactor trip. A FTC corresponding to BOC conditions was used in the analysis. This FTC causes the least amount of negative reactivity feedback to mitigate the transient increases in both the core heat flux and the pressure. The uncertainty on the FTC used in the analyses is shown in Table 14.5-1. Sensitivity studies were performed to determine the most limiting set of initial conditions, provided in Tables 14.5-1 (RCS Pressure) and 14.5-3 (Secondary Peak Pressure). Pressurizer pressure and level, SG level, RCS inlet temperature and RCS flow rate were ranged, one parameter at a time. The most limiting set of initial conditions is provided in the Tables. The lower limit on initial RCS pressure is used to maximize the rate of change of pressure, and thus peak pressure, following trips. For the case to maximize RCS peak pressure, the lower limit on Tin is assumed, which results in a lower initial second pressure, delays the opening of MSSVs, and maximizes RCS pressure. | ||
14.5.3.3 Results The Loss of Load event has been analyzed to ensure that the significant pressure increase experienced during the event remains below 110% of design. | 14.5.3.3 Results The Loss of Load event has been analyzed to ensure that the significant pressure increase experienced during the event remains below 110% of design. | ||
Table 14.5-2 contains the sequence of events to calculate maximum RCS pressure. Figures 14.5-1 through 14.5-6 present the transient core power, core CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR | Table 14.5-2 contains the sequence of events to calculate maximum RCS pressure. Figures 14.5-1 through 14.5-6 present the transient core power, core CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-2 Rev. 49 average heat flux, RCS pressure, RCS temperature behavior, SG pressure, and pressurizer water volume. | ||
Table 14.5-4 contains the sequence of events for the maximum peak secondary pressure analysis. No additional parameter plots for this case are provided as they are very similar to Figures 14.5-1 through 14.5-6. | Table 14.5-4 contains the sequence of events for the maximum peak secondary pressure analysis. No additional parameter plots for this case are provided as they are very similar to Figures 14.5-1 through 14.5-6. | ||
The results show the peak RCS pressure and peak secondary pressure remain below 110% of design. Due to the prominent pressure | |||
The results show the peak RCS pressure and peak secondary pressure remain below 110% of design. Due to the prominent pressure spik e combined with the limited power increase, the minimum DNBR and peak LHR will not challenge the SAFDLs. As such, no explicit calculations are included for this event. Cases were analyzed to verify the applicability of the MSSV out -of-service power levels as stated in the Technical Specifications and to determine the peak pressurizer level following a Loss of Load. The radiological consequences of opening the MSSVs during the most adverse Loss of Load event are less adverse than the LOA C event. | |||
14. | 14. | ||
==5.4 CONCLUSION== | ==5.4 CONCLUSION== | ||
S The analysis of the Loss of Load event demonstrates that the action of the High Pressurizer Pressure Trip, PSVs, and MSSVs is sufficient to ensure that the integrity of the RCS and Main Steam System are maintained without any credit for the SDBS and the pressurizer PORVs. The radiological consequence of opening the MSSVs during the event is a site boundary dose which is negligible compared to the 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines. | S The analysis of the Loss of Load event demonstrates that the action of the High Pressurizer Pressure Trip, PSVs, and MSSVs is sufficient to ensure that the integrity of the RCS and Main Steam System are maintained without any credit for the SDBS and the pressurizer PORVs. The radiological consequence of opening the MSSVs during the event is a site boundary dose which is negligible compared to the 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines. | ||
TABLE 14.5-1 INITIAL CONDITIONS AND INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THE LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO CALCULATE MAXIMUM RCS PRESSURE PARAMETER | CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-3 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-1 INITIAL CONDITIONS AND INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THE LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO CALCULATE MAXIMUM RCS PRESSURE PARAMETER UNITS VALUE Initial Core Power Level MWt 2754(b) | ||
Initial Core Inlet Coolant Temperature | Initial Core Inlet Coolant Temperature F 546 Vessel Flow Rate gpm 412,000 Initial PZR Pressure psia 2164(a) | ||
Initial Pressurizer Liquid Level | Initial Pressurizer Liquid Level --- 67.2% span Initial SG Pressure psia N/A Initial SG Level %NR 69 MTC X 10-4 /F +0.15 Doppler Coefficient X 10-4 /F -0.08(e) | ||
Doppler Coefficient Uncertainty | Doppler Coefficient Uncertainty % N/A Number of Plugged SG Tubes % 10 Axial Shape Index --- N/A CEA Worth at Trip % -5.0 Time to 90% Insertion of SCRAM Rods sec 3.1 RRS Operating Mode Manual SDBS Operating Mode Inoperative MSSV Opening Pressure psia 1029.25 Pressurizer Pressure Control System Operating Mode Manual Pressurizer Level Control System Operating Mode Manual Turbine Stop Valve Stroke Time Sec 0.0(d) | ||
(a) | |||
Corresponds to Technical Specification minimum indicated pressure of 2200 psia. The value includes an uncertainty on indicated pressurizer pressure. | (a) Corresponds to Technical Specification minimum indicated pressure of 2200 psia. The value includes an uncertainty on indicated pressurizer pressure. | ||
(b) | (b) Value does not include 17 MWt of pump heat. | ||
Value does not include 17 MWt of pump heat. | |||
(c) | (c) Deleted. | ||
Deleted. | |||
(d) | (d) A faster turbine stop valve stroke time results in higher peak primary pressure. | ||
A faster turbine stop valve stroke time results in higher peak primary pressure. | |||
(e) | (e) The Doppler reactivity feedback includes an uncertainty of 10%. | ||
The Doppler reactivity feedback includes an uncertainty of 10%. | |||
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR | CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-4 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-2 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO MAXIMIZE CALCULATED RCS PEAK PRESSURE TIME (sec) EVENT SETPOINT OR VALUE 0.0 Event Initiation --- | ||
5.2, 5.5 MSSVs Open --- | |||
6.17 High Pressurizer Pressure Trip Setpoint 2420 psia 7.55 Peak Reactor Power 102.5% RTP 7.58 CEAs Begin to Insert --- | |||
8.10 PSV RC-200 Opens --- | |||
8.87 PSV RC-201 Opens --- | |||
8.75 Peak RCS Pressure 2706.6 psia 9.2 Peak Secondary Pressure 1094.8 psia 10.8 PSVs RC-201 Closes --- | |||
11.25 Peak Pressurizer Level 75.32% span 11.6 PSVs RC-200 Closes --- | |||
14.55 Peak Reactor Vessel Inlet Temperature 565.9 | |||
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-5 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-3 INITIAL CONDITIONS AND INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THE LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO CALCULATE MAXIMUM SECONDARY PRESSURE PARAMETER UNITS VALUE Initial Core Power Level MWt 2754(b) | |||
Initial Core Inlet Coolant Temperature F 550 Vessel Flow Rate gpm 370,000 Initial PZR Pressure psia 2164(a) | |||
Initial Pressurizer Liquid Level --- 32.2% span Initial SG Pressure psia N/A MTC X 10-4 /F +0.15 Doppler Coefficient X 10-4 /F -0.08(d) | |||
CEA Worth at Trip % -5.0 Number of Plugged SG Tubes % 0 Time to 90% Insertion of SCRAM Rods sec 3.1 RRS Operating Mode Manual SDBS Operating Mode Inoperative MSSV Opening Pressure psia 1029.25 Pressurizer Pressure Control System Operating Mode Auto Pressurizer Level Control System Operating Mode Auto Turbine Stop Valve Stroke Time sec 0.15-2(c) | |||
(a) Corresponds to Technical Specification minimum indicated pressure of 2200 psia. The value includes an uncertainty on indicated pressurizer pressure. | |||
(b) Value does not include 17 MWt of pump heat. | |||
(c) A range of turbine stop valve stroke times between 0.15 seconds and 2 seconds has been analyzed. | |||
(d) The Doppler reactivity feedback includes an uncertainty of 10%. | |||
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-6 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-4 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO MAXIMIZE CALCULATED SECONDARY PEAK PRESSURE | |||
TIME(sec) EVENT SETPOINT OF VALUE 0.0 Event Initiation --- | |||
8.2 SG Safety Valves Begin to Open 1029.35 psia 15.4 High Pressurizer Pressure Trip Setpoint 2420 psia 16.2 Peak Reactor Power 102.8% RTP 16.3 Trip Breakers Open Setpoint + 0.9 sec 16.8 CEA Insertion Begins Breakers open + 0.5 sec 18.6 Peak RCS Pressure(a) 2517.2 psia 19.8 Peak Pressurizer Level 44.1% span 22.6 Peak Secondary Pressure(a) 1101.8 psia 24.6 Peak Reactor Vessel Inlet Temperature 568.8 | |||
8. | |||
(a) Peak Pressure includes elevation head. | |||
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-7 Rev. 49}} | |||
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR |
Revision as of 19:42, 19 November 2024
Text
14.5 LOSS OF LOAD EVENT 14.5.1 IDENTIFICATION OF EVENT AND CAUSE The primary function of the turbine stop valves (throttle valves on Unit 2) are to quickly shut off steam flow to the high pressure turbine. There are four valves in parallel off a common header which are located upstream of the turbine control valves (governor valves on Unit 2) and downstream of the MSIVs. The quick closure of the stop valves prevents overspeeding the turbine when there is a turbine trip. A turbine trip can be the result of a reactor trip, loss of electrical load, loss of condenser vacuum, low oil pressure, etc.
A Loss of Load event is defined as any event that results in a reduction in the SGs heat removal capacity through the loss of secondary steam flow. Closure of all MSIVs, turbine stop valves, or turbine control valves will cause a Loss of Load event. Of the three types of valves in the steam lines between the SG and the high pressure turbine, the turbine stop valves have the quickest closure time.
The most limiting Loss of Load event for primary system overpressure is a turbine trip without a concurrent reactor trip or an inadvertent closure of the turbine stop valves at HFP. A turbine trip would result in the closure of the turbine stop valves.
14.5.2 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS A Loss of Load event can result in an approach to the DNBR and LHGR SAFDLs and the RCS Pressure Upset Limit. The action of the TM/LP, the Variable High Power, or the High Pressurizer Pressure Trip will prevent exceeding these limits. Since no fuel pin failures are postulated to occur, the site boundary dose criteria in the 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines will not be approached.
The most limiting criteria for the Loss of Load event are the RCS and Secondary Pressure Upset Limit of 110% of design. Normally the non-safety grade turbine trip would initiate a reactor trip and lessen the peak pressure. In analyzing this event, no credit is allowed for this trip (Section 7.2.3.8).
A Loss of Load event is initiated at HFP by the termination of steam flow to the turbine.
The immediate system response is a rapid increase in SG pressure and temperature with the RCS adding heat and without any steam being extracted from the SG. To maximize the pressure and temperature increase, no credit is allowed for the Steam Dump and Bypass System (SDBS) which would reduce the pressure transient. With the SDBS inoperable, the secondary pressure will rapidly reach the SG safety valve analysis setpoints.
With the inability of the SG to remove the heat from the RCS, the RCS temperature will rapidly begin to increase. The pressurizer pressure and level will increase with the increasing RCS temperature. To maximize RCS pressure no credit is taken for the pressurizer pressure and level control system. Consequently, the pressure will rapidly approach the PORV analysis setpoint and the High Pressurizer Pressure Analysis Trip setpoint. To maximize the peak RCS pressure, no credit is taken for the action of the PORVs.
To maximize secondary peak pressure, credit is taken for the pressurizer pressure control system. This will delay the high pressurizer pressure trip and thus add more energy to the secondary system.
The analysis assumes a positive MTC which will add positive reactivity with the increasing RCS temperature. The MTC is normally negative at HFP. The core power and core
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-1 Rev. 49 average heat flux will increase and further increase the rate of the primary system pressurization.
A High Pressurizer Pressure Trip will be initiated when the pressure reaches the analysis setpoint. The reactor trip will terminate the core power increase after some delay reflecting RPS response, CEA holding coil, and CEA insertion time intervals. The core power will then rapidly decrease to the decay power level. The core average heat flux will follow the core power but will lag the core power due to the fuel time constant.
After the reactor trip, the pressurizer pressure will continue to increase and approach the PSVs' opening pressure analysis setpoint. This is caused by the above-mentioned delays and the core heat flux lagging behind the core power, which results in additional heat being added to the coolant.
The pressurizer pressure will peak and then start to rapidly decrease once the heat flux decays as the SGs begin removing heat through the MSSVs. Consequently, PSVs that opened will close.
The RCS temperatures will slowly decrease and approach the saturation temperature corresponding to the lowest MSSV pressure analysis setpoint.
14.5.3 CORE AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 14.5.3.1 Mathematical Models The NSSS response to the Loss of Load event was simulated using the S-RELAP5 computer code described in Section 14.1.4.2.
14.5.3.2 Input Parameters and Initial Conditions The input parameters and initial conditions used in the analysis to maximize peak RCS pressure are listed in Table 14.5-1 for the present cycles of Unit 1 and Unit 2.
The input parameters and initial conditions used in the analysis to maximize peak secondary pressure are listed in Table 14.5-3. Those parameters, which are unique to the analysis, are discussed below.
The most positive MTC was assumed. This MTC, in conjunction with the increasing coolant temperatures, maximizes the rate of change of heat flux and the pressure at the time of reactor trip. A FTC corresponding to BOC conditions was used in the analysis. This FTC causes the least amount of negative reactivity feedback to mitigate the transient increases in both the core heat flux and the pressure. The uncertainty on the FTC used in the analyses is shown in Table 14.5-1. Sensitivity studies were performed to determine the most limiting set of initial conditions, provided in Tables 14.5-1 (RCS Pressure) and 14.5-3 (Secondary Peak Pressure). Pressurizer pressure and level, SG level, RCS inlet temperature and RCS flow rate were ranged, one parameter at a time. The most limiting set of initial conditions is provided in the Tables. The lower limit on initial RCS pressure is used to maximize the rate of change of pressure, and thus peak pressure, following trips. For the case to maximize RCS peak pressure, the lower limit on Tin is assumed, which results in a lower initial second pressure, delays the opening of MSSVs, and maximizes RCS pressure.
14.5.3.3 Results The Loss of Load event has been analyzed to ensure that the significant pressure increase experienced during the event remains below 110% of design.
Table 14.5-2 contains the sequence of events to calculate maximum RCS pressure. Figures 14.5-1 through 14.5-6 present the transient core power, core CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-2 Rev. 49 average heat flux, RCS pressure, RCS temperature behavior, SG pressure, and pressurizer water volume.
Table 14.5-4 contains the sequence of events for the maximum peak secondary pressure analysis. No additional parameter plots for this case are provided as they are very similar to Figures 14.5-1 through 14.5-6.
The results show the peak RCS pressure and peak secondary pressure remain below 110% of design. Due to the prominent pressure spik e combined with the limited power increase, the minimum DNBR and peak LHR will not challenge the SAFDLs. As such, no explicit calculations are included for this event. Cases were analyzed to verify the applicability of the MSSV out -of-service power levels as stated in the Technical Specifications and to determine the peak pressurizer level following a Loss of Load. The radiological consequences of opening the MSSVs during the most adverse Loss of Load event are less adverse than the LOA C event.
14.
5.4 CONCLUSION
S The analysis of the Loss of Load event demonstrates that the action of the High Pressurizer Pressure Trip, PSVs, and MSSVs is sufficient to ensure that the integrity of the RCS and Main Steam System are maintained without any credit for the SDBS and the pressurizer PORVs. The radiological consequence of opening the MSSVs during the event is a site boundary dose which is negligible compared to the 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines.
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-3 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-1 INITIAL CONDITIONS AND INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THE LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO CALCULATE MAXIMUM RCS PRESSURE PARAMETER UNITS VALUE Initial Core Power Level MWt 2754(b)
Initial Core Inlet Coolant Temperature F 546 Vessel Flow Rate gpm 412,000 Initial PZR Pressure psia 2164(a)
Initial Pressurizer Liquid Level --- 67.2% span Initial SG Pressure psia N/A Initial SG Level %NR 69 MTC X 10-4 /F +0.15 Doppler Coefficient X 10-4 /F -0.08(e)
Doppler Coefficient Uncertainty % N/A Number of Plugged SG Tubes % 10 Axial Shape Index --- N/A CEA Worth at Trip % -5.0 Time to 90% Insertion of SCRAM Rods sec 3.1 RRS Operating Mode Manual SDBS Operating Mode Inoperative MSSV Opening Pressure psia 1029.25 Pressurizer Pressure Control System Operating Mode Manual Pressurizer Level Control System Operating Mode Manual Turbine Stop Valve Stroke Time Sec 0.0(d)
(a) Corresponds to Technical Specification minimum indicated pressure of 2200 psia. The value includes an uncertainty on indicated pressurizer pressure.
(b) Value does not include 17 MWt of pump heat.
(c) Deleted.
(d) A faster turbine stop valve stroke time results in higher peak primary pressure.
(e) The Doppler reactivity feedback includes an uncertainty of 10%.
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-4 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-2 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO MAXIMIZE CALCULATED RCS PEAK PRESSURE TIME (sec) EVENT SETPOINT OR VALUE 0.0 Event Initiation ---
5.2, 5.5 MSSVs Open ---
6.17 High Pressurizer Pressure Trip Setpoint 2420 psia 7.55 Peak Reactor Power 102.5% RTP 7.58 CEAs Begin to Insert ---
8.10 PSV RC-200 Opens ---
8.87 PSV RC-201 Opens ---
8.75 Peak RCS Pressure 2706.6 psia 9.2 Peak Secondary Pressure 1094.8 psia 10.8 PSVs RC-201 Closes ---
11.25 Peak Pressurizer Level 75.32% span 11.6 PSVs RC-200 Closes ---
14.55 Peak Reactor Vessel Inlet Temperature 565.9
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-5 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-3 INITIAL CONDITIONS AND INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THE LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO CALCULATE MAXIMUM SECONDARY PRESSURE PARAMETER UNITS VALUE Initial Core Power Level MWt 2754(b)
Initial Core Inlet Coolant Temperature F 550 Vessel Flow Rate gpm 370,000 Initial PZR Pressure psia 2164(a)
Initial Pressurizer Liquid Level --- 32.2% span Initial SG Pressure psia N/A MTC X 10-4 /F +0.15 Doppler Coefficient X 10-4 /F -0.08(d)
CEA Worth at Trip % -5.0 Number of Plugged SG Tubes % 0 Time to 90% Insertion of SCRAM Rods sec 3.1 RRS Operating Mode Manual SDBS Operating Mode Inoperative MSSV Opening Pressure psia 1029.25 Pressurizer Pressure Control System Operating Mode Auto Pressurizer Level Control System Operating Mode Auto Turbine Stop Valve Stroke Time sec 0.15-2(c)
(a) Corresponds to Technical Specification minimum indicated pressure of 2200 psia. The value includes an uncertainty on indicated pressurizer pressure.
(b) Value does not include 17 MWt of pump heat.
(c) A range of turbine stop valve stroke times between 0.15 seconds and 2 seconds has been analyzed.
(d) The Doppler reactivity feedback includes an uncertainty of 10%.
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-6 Rev. 49 TABLE 14.5-4 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR LOSS OF LOAD EVENT TO MAXIMIZE CALCULATED SECONDARY PEAK PRESSURE
TIME(sec) EVENT SETPOINT OF VALUE 0.0 Event Initiation ---
8.2 SG Safety Valves Begin to Open 1029.35 psia 15.4 High Pressurizer Pressure Trip Setpoint 2420 psia 16.2 Peak Reactor Power 102.8% RTP 16.3 Trip Breakers Open Setpoint + 0.9 sec 16.8 CEA Insertion Begins Breakers open + 0.5 sec 18.6 Peak RCS Pressure(a) 2517.2 psia 19.8 Peak Pressurizer Level 44.1% span 22.6 Peak Secondary Pressure(a) 1101.8 psia 24.6 Peak Reactor Vessel Inlet Temperature 568.8
(a) Peak Pressure includes elevation head.
CALVERT CLIFFS UFSAR 14.5-7 Rev. 49