Latest revision as of 18:39, 5 August 2021

Text

Partially Deleted Results of Discussion W/Zimmerman Re Issue of Regulatory Oversight for Plant,Unit 2 Restart Being Managed Under Mc 0350 Process.Believes That Mc 0350 Process for Activity Should Be Followed
	ML20216F101
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/27/1995
From:	Cooper R; NRC
To:	Kane W, Martin T; NRC
Shared Package
ML20216E891	List: IA-97-469, Partially Deleted Results of Discussion W/Zimmerman Re Issue of Regulatory Oversight for Plant,Unit 2 Restart Being Managed Under Mc 0350 Process.Believes That Mc 0350 Process for Activity Should Be Followed; ML20216E887; ML20216F056; ML20216F101;
References
	FOIA-97-469 NUDOCS 9803180252
	Download: ML20216F101 (39)
	v • d • e

V h1/W big9 6 M 10 1

,- From: Richar .

er (RWC)

To: FK '

\ Date: Fgidy, anuary 27, 1995 11:15 as Subjecti ~ MC 0350 - Millstone 2 I discussed with Zimmerman the issue of regulatory oversight for Millstone 2 restart being managed under the MC 0350 process, and particularly discussed -

the balance of increased administrative burden on the staff versus the need to {

follow a prescribed agency process if the specific conditions warrant it. He (NRR), like you, Tim, believes that we should follow the MC 0350 process for this activity.

Jacque, Larry - make it happen. In so doing, make judicious use of the IP3 "models" to minimize the admin, burden.

Dick C. [7"[gM -

CC: PFM, J)D, LEN

/ ) !

}lha j$&

f ,

i l

i i l l l

\'..,e -\ ,-

9803180252 980316 61 PDR FOIA O'MEALI97-469

- -s t PDR -

RAP AGENDA ITEMS SEPTEMBER ,1997 NEW BUSINESS:

Approve the meeting minutes from the August 13,1997 meeting.

. Discuss the status of MC 40500/OSTI, update of staffing, scheduling and planning.

(Trapp, Shedlosky) Do we still do the 40500 as scheduled, do we delay the OSTl?

Status of the MC 0350 process (Residents)

Assessment of licensee performance (All)

[ Status of the ICAVP process (Imbrol Reynolds)

Status of the employees concern program (Mc Kee) y Status and potential problems of licensing actions (Project Managers)

OLD BUSINESS:

jf' Brief discussion of the content of the licensee's power ascension plan. Discussion at the next RAP meeting of the SPO power ascension coverage plan. (Blumberg)

[ Determine the extent of application of instrument uncertainty for Millstone Station.

(Scholl) e Preparation for the next SMM, should there be a formal preparation of the PIM and PPR?

e I

(

i I

L f /\. ,

l l

r

a. .

8 MILLSTONE RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL I .

l December 5,1996 l

Participants:

W. Travers W. Lanning J. Durr D. Mc Donald J. Andersen S. Reynolds T. Easlick D. Beaulieu T. Cerne The Millstone Restart Assessment Panel has assumed the functions of the Millstone Oversight Team.

P.

E )

l.

f(A

~l 1

i i

r e

M The Unit 3 Significant items List has been updated and needs to be approved by the RAP for attachment to the Commission paper. The updated list will ba distributed to the RAP members by December 9,1996 for review and approval.

W. Travers and E. Imbro have been added as members to the Restart Assessment Panel.

The " white paper" for Indian Point 3 contains the inspection elements for the programmatic issue. This will be used by the OSTI for inspection attributes at Millstone.

A memorandum will be developed from W. Lanning to P. Mc Kee to initiate negotiations for NRR technical and inspection support.

The Project Managers will develop a list of potential licensing issues for each unit to M include generic issues that need review before plant restart.

6.9

1 i 1[h _

__... -g The, agenda for the December 17,1996 meeting with the public is as follows: y w\

_ ob astor M , W. 5 d M

1) Discussion of the formation of the Office of Special Projects.

(Travers)

2) Discussion of the afternoon meeting with the licensee on the recovery plans. (Travers)

3) Status of the ICAVP. (lmbro)

4) Employee concerns. (Mc Kee)

5) Recent inspection findings. (Durr) e J. Durr will verify that the licensee can accomplish their discussia af all three units within the allotted time during the meeting on December 17. He #.,11 also confirm the periodicity of the future status meetings to be held between the NRC and the licenset;, approximately every two months.

i l

l 2

i l

l l

i

. ?.' '*

)

I MILLSTONE RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL FEBRUARY 5, 1997 MEETING MINUTES PARTICIPANTS: S., Reynolds J. Andersen R. Arrighi C. Marco L. Plisco J. Durr H. Pastis E. Imbro S. Dembek W. Lanning A. Cerne T. Easlick D. Beaulieu P. Mc Kee W. Traverr, A. Burritt L. Scholl The Millstone Restart Assessment Panel (RAP) met to discuss the inspection program for the restart of the,three Millstone units. The initial p3 us for the inspection of Millstone Unit 3 were presented and the conceptual ap.1 roach was approved by the panel (See attachment 1). The panel directed that the j open NRC inspection items be resource loaded to estimate the total inspection resources needed to support the restart of the reactors. The panel also directed that the Significant Items list reflect the Manual Chapter 0350 line items that are satisfied by the individual inspections.

e / b lf$.5F 7(0 1 I

i i l I j l

I -

l f i

i .

I l The panel considered the need to modify the existing 50.54 (f) letters to M I clarify the information needed prior to restart and when that information would be needed. It was decided that SPO(L) would review the existing letters I and prepare new letters. In particular, these letters will request the licensee to submit their restart punchlist (as determined above). The letters '

will request the licensee to provide the current deferred items list and a i final deferred items list 60 days before the final readiness for restart of each unit. staff.

) The panel requested a milestone chart of the restart process be developed to establish the mechanics and scope of the process. (J. Durr)

F-

' 1 Ey9

%) '

1 ,' #

C0'uds wAM EK 6 u &

g _ ..

(

VI i~ . -

wm mAwss.,

A(

The panel discussed the NRC's oversight of the employees concern program. H.

a Pastis agreed to provide the panel with an update of the NRC's program at the l next meeting. l I

The panel agreed that they need to meet on a monthly basis. The March meeting date will be decided at the next Monday morning meeting.

The panel discussed the status of the licensee's program to provide the NRC with complete closure. packages for our inspection items. This was discussed i with the utility at 1he December 17,1996 meeting (see transcript) . To date, the licensee has not been succe7sful in providing completed packages for inspection.

ACTION ITEMS: Senior resident inspectors for Millstone Units 1,2 and 3 resource load the open items list. Add a reference to the Significant Items Lists to reflece the MC 0350 line item satisfied by the individual inspection items, The SPO(L) & SPO(I) will develop a description of what the restart punch list should contain and what shou?.d be submitted on the docket.

The SPO(L) will develop a new 10 CFR 50.54 (f) letter that will update the needs of the agency regarding what documents should be prov Med by the licensee to support NRC oversight needs.

J. Durr will develop a restart proirat milestone chart.

H. Pastis will provide the RAP with an update on the employees concern program oversight and inspection plans at the next meeting.

6 2

1

.o o

MILLSTONE l

RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL MARCH 5. 1997 PARTICIPANTS: J. Andersen R. Arrighi D. Beaulieu N. Blumberg A. Burritt A. Cerne S. Dembek J. Durr T. Easlick E. Imbro W. Lanning P. Mc Kee H. Pastis S. Reynolds L. Scholl W. Travers .

OLD BUSINESS:

l ACTION ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING:

l Senior resident inspectors for Millstone Units 1.2 and 3 resource load the open items list. Add a reference to the Significant Items Lists to reflect the MC 0350 line item satisfied by the individual inspection !

items. '

The task was completed and incorporated into the Significant Items Lists. Issues that are restart issues have been incorporated into the SIL's.

The SP0(L) & SP0(I) will develop a description of what the restart punch list should contain and what should be submitted on the docket.

A draft letter was prepared by SP0(L) for comment. Comments to be provided to J. Andersen not later than Monday.

The SP0(L) will develop a new 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter that will update the needs of the agency regarding what documents should be provided by the licensee to support NRC oversight needs.

J. Andersen provide the draft letter to the panel for review and comment. The panel discussed various approaches and J. Andersen will redraft the letter by March 6 and provide it to the panel for comments by March 10.

l 1

J. Durr will develop a restart program milestone chart. "-~

} ,

)

Qtuih uk@ - W c

_ Ib[.hO lb

.]

e

This item was completed, copy attached. Enclosure 1 t EV.4 ,

'lh . .,:

i w &

e H. Pastis will provide the RAP with an update on the employees concern program oversight and inspection plans at the next meeting.

A discussion of the licensee's response to the order, development of the comprehensive employee concerns program, the selection of the independent oversight contractor and the NRC's actions was held.

See attached slides ( Enclosure 2).

NEW BUSINESS:

$.$ b l

I L .. ----W j

2. Review and approval of Unit 3 RAP revisions, including changes to the Significant Items List (SIL). l

3. Review and approval of Unit 1 RAP. including the SIL.

4. Review and approval of Unit 2 RAP including the SIL.

5. Review and approval of resource loading of open items list for all three units.

Items 2.3.4. and 5: ' The lists were discussed and the following

> comments provided.

9

S. Reynolds will provide comments on the wording for the

" Improving Station Performance" section.

Add a line item to each SIL requiring the review of all deferred items.

- - I

I Make the responsibility columns consistent from unit to unit (i.e. Use the sam acronyms).

Generic items should be used consistently in each SIL.

Verify MEPL can be closed based on the TIA.

6. Review and approval of description of what the restart punch list should contain and what should be submitted on the docket. This would include when the meeting minutes should be docketed.

The panel discussed this issue at length and decided that the draft letter that SP0(L) ' prepared would be revised (see second bullet above) to include the discussion comments and reissued for panel approval.

7. Status of new 50.54(f) letter regarding what documents should be l

provided by the licensee to support NRC oversight needs.

l l

See item 6.

1 L 8. Review and approval of restart program milestone chart.

i

The milestone chart was provided to the panel. The panel observed i

that the ACRS was becoming involved. SP0(D) will determine the degree that the ACRS will impact the restart decision process.

Q~

10h -

10. Update of Employee Concerns program oversight and review of inspections a\

plans.

H. Pastis made a preuntation discussing the progress in the employees concern program. See attached slides.

g 11. Status and schedules for Units 1 & 3 ICAVP oversight activities.

The panel observed that there appears to be significant delays being encountered by the licensee in the development of the design basis for Hillstone Unit 1. The licensee will be asked to discuss this at the next RAP /NU meeting. (Imbro)

Additional Discussion Items:

L. Scholl suggested that the licensee should complete self assessments on the programmatic areas of their programs before the NRC inspects them. The panel agreed that this was a desirable approach, and the question would be posed to the licensee at the next meeting of the RAP /NU. .

The licensed operator training issues should be a line item in the SIL.

(Durr)

The licensee should discuss the " comprehensive" employees concern program plan at the March 18, 1997 meeting.

Action Items:

e J. Andersen to provide an updated 50.54(f) letter for the panels review by March 7. 1997. The panel will review the letter and provide their comments not later than close of business March 10.1997.

Np e W. Travers will determine the involvement of the ACRS in the final restart decision process.

J. Durr and S. Reynolds will resolve the comments in line item 5.

E. Imbro will contact the licensee to inform them that the panel expects a discussion of the possible delays in the Unit 1 ICAVP start date.

. J. Durr will ensure there are line items in each units SIL addressing licensed operator training.

s. n

.. . t Enclosure 1 Project Chart for Millstone Units 1 2, and 3.

l t

t w

M A

G R N

I G

F E

O.

R I P R S N B N O L R I E E T N C E A A N N U 7 9

P O O L 9 T C T A 1 S V ,

N Y L E 5 E T L h M E I F c r

S F M F a S A T A M E S T S A S S E C A E Y R T O N R L A P T

S M E E R E H

T 4

t h s gt .

i gl s a i t

nah ee r

ed u y at y t rt o vi v .

r s onl oiO a n rd m pe p _

y dC n

pr i .

t riE e of e -

adN dr c c n nf pen i ni ooc i h t c o ,

n df i f ee o t yvbii irl a o nt t h uy eef ns al nu .

t ql t d ae c o n t

ns n n e sh s a eae dh dn pe e e eCr r

pR e l p _

E y d e _

V n e ne d nl omNn i v _

piop e i poe a s m I

n he m ch n T et d ad e C niiz n t e et o b oi t h

e _

E n i

ead e e s a r J h gn v nt s s c p _

B t r a o r t ouef i m

O e oy p ls minin t o _

v p l l pe c _

N el ht e Mwi i

o r a s _

O e cd p t a d i si I

p t u aq n hevie O _

T a ht e a t red l t h C A E U d d w f Pca n N n ea e oOii L a r uw i v ) n h e N

A w s e e P P h gn V ni rOTc ut o w E i e

v ore ev l l P I e t os l i

e v

e t iTehd rl oi e l

l r

Ct

,h e

w(

o s m I

TnhM at l l

r i

wHt c l

). it nt a i w

f Lu f aaPd r e n gC u ab es f f ,d f f ta nn aoS r a s ic oo t s ret p( e s e a nc t s

Ct al Cth mi ah C Rzi l RgaprOc o R Nnw i Nirs oCy N he gh ao e r grEt e e r h vr o e p pN fa h Tow TopaNs T e e e

l.' Y lS

)a P E

h

)b

. t

'e e e e

- = - -

E v R PIR r n e -

e -

a v l i godv ei

_ u e rpe E $ $ ?.I$$;! n i

e

l[w!s l h4

,.hih h l

a t

e w aew s-N

.m en nda a

n N nd d E t a

a C Tp p O hp I p s' ir r o T

~

r o c dv P v o -

Pe O e m at P t p rh O h r yt es e e V I

T h

e Oe v e l E P n et c R s r i S O i v s o I P e gin G pl p ho t

H a

l a ot f T n

n fh S -

s f o

t e T u r hor e A b F m r Eg F e a i

t t

s o mn p z i A e l v l C d o a b

i n y i t T y g eo I t e en V I

h St T e m p ao f I o l ep E m

r o y yt er S g

a e e Co f

n s o r i

z a a f

nm c

t e .

e t i

o y t r h

.n c ne s

o n

c e

r x n s.

e

e d C n

a H

L s y e

e y

b o . e l s d p e a T m u s m R e i s s r O y n o P b C o .

t c

P S i t e d E a p U e s d s S i f

o n n a e i N r s m

t O s t r n I n o m e T r f o d e f c i

s C c e e e E n g r r P o n d y S c i y t n . b N t e

i d a e c k I

f u s e n e e

R a a u e s d w O e f-l e

s s n r F e yC s

i e e S s f p p oR o e E l pN O n d s r

C o n u R me C i t

i o

U eh t E u d e h O w o N l o u 2 S et n d N s e n :

E f r i t d ye o n e R l hi s s e

e o d e

t a t s c e nr l u n e C n os s e c H s mno r i l

L e

c 2 wi t w w s r e eag e e s u r i i v

i v e o u v el e e e s s

s e

s l l

o Ra R R A R c

n E

o e e e 1

s ,

i >.

F:JJ Restart Assessment Panel Meeting Conducted on May 1,1997 Location - Millstone Station

l. Attendees:

Soecial Projects Offica Dan Mcdonald ill Travers Jacque Durr Gene Imbro Peter Koltay Wayne Lanning Rick Urban Phil McKee Tony Cerne Dave Beaulieu Ted Eastick Norman Blumberg Larry Scholl Steve Reynolds Russ Arrighi Art Burritt John Nakoski By Telephone:

i Jim Andersen Steve Dembek Helen Pastis Commissioners Office l

~

Tony Hsia - Technical Assistant to Commissioner Diaz RAP AGENDA ITEMS II. ACTION ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING: r j h. ^

l h

1A h ,

i _ : w i w d h e n.u rz u w s w ig w s m rg s n 1 e g g N yg g g ggex x a.c a m g.g yie C W ~~ 5 '

e W. Travers will determine the involvement of the ACRS in the final restart decision process.

(1) ACRS does not want to be involved in the Millstone restart process.

They want to be involved after the fact.

v

- g \

bwinuk E%.EJ-%

i _ _

________J

J ' .y (2) This could change if the Commission requests ACRS involvement or if the ACRS changes their mind from their current position.

e E. Imbro will contact the licensee to inform them that the panel expects a discussion of the possible delays in the Unit 1 ICAVP start date.

(1) No Unit 1 start date as of yet. May not be until 1998.

(2) Unit 2 and Unit 3 may develop a single project for CMP.

(3) RSS issue still open Ill. NEW BUSINESS:

e STATUS OF THE MC 0350 PROCESS (N. BLUMBERG)

STATUS OF MC 0350 - January 26,1998 (1) 11 nit 3 SIL 85 items on the U3 SIL i

As of IR 97 19 items have been closed and 12 items have been updated l

l Excerpts from inspection reports are maintained on file in the Regional Office verifying specific closeouts and updates. This will provide an l auditable trail.

(2) Unit 2 SIL l

i As of IR 97-01 no Sllitems have been identified as closed or updated l

l (3) Unit 1 SIL l

As of IR 97-01 no SIL items have been identified as closed or updated (4) MC 0350 GENERAL (a) 4.04 b. - Interaction with other agencies (FEMA, EPA, and DOJ) ongoing - status unknown e Per RAP discussion - EPA not involved. Bill Travers maintaining coordination with DOJ. Dan Mcdonald to set up coordination with FEMA through processes established in NOR. Norm Blumberg will establish coordination with DRS through Mike Modes section.

e (b) 8.4.4 - State and local officials involved with the Millstone process and status.

Per RAP discussion - Numerous public meetings and State has established the NEAC. Bill Travers maintains coordination with Connecticut liaison officer - Kevin McCarthy. We must keep Region I liaison officer, Dave Chawaga in the loop.

(c) Except for continuing inspection of SIL items, most inspection effort in Section C has not been done or even started. Residents need to look at 0350 to determine if any recent inspection effort can cause a Section C item to be signed off.

(5) RAP Decisions (a) SIL items involving licensing matters should refer to licensing issues I listed in Enclosure 5 to the RAP. (See licensing actions below for NRR review of the SIL)

(b) Common items for Units 1,2 and 3 should be linked. Not yet done now but in progress. (Action: L. Scholl)

(c) Thermo Lag actions need to be added to licensing issues.

(d) Enforcement package needs to be issued. Impacting both the NRC-SPO and the licensee. Also will impact the SIL and ICAVP process (e) SIL should be reformatted. All Units should be consistent. Sil will not be reformatted areas of comrnon interest will be tied toge" (Action: J.Durr)

N k.D 'P ; j 18 / !

i (e) Dan Mcdonald will establish a protocol for the review of FSAR j submittals.

(f) We need a better SIL status in-house (SPO). This is under review.

r- E e h s

u- -

. . . .. A . ,

f A TT : y ' ;: ;~-%.:~ ,% 441. - % + 4 X{.]L&*$Q&S i *f5y>.2M& ,%%;iL24LC' TEC

            /      )W
                            ~

STATUS OF THE ALLEGATION PROCESS (R. URBAN) (1) There are 50 open allegations (2) 19 allegations involve non-technical issues

r (3) 31 allegations involve technical issues (4) Late Allegations: 3 - overs 1 year l 3 - 6 months to 1 year l 5 - 3 months to 6 months

                ,            11 < 3 months (5)        rg,                                        {'~*        .y.,              ]

rp L i Status of specific allegations were discussed (6) (7) Alegations should be prioritized as to their importance and to those I whichway impact restart (8) Region I goal to eliminate allegation backlog in 6 months

                                                                          .                       7
               ,ge,                                                                                  ,

J (10) h, ,b a.g L

                  '                                                                                  s (12)   See next item for more SIL decisions a         WHAT SIL ISSUES WILL BE ADDRESSED BY ICAVP? (ALL)                                  ,

(1) Gene Imbro will mark up SIL to reflect ICAVP items and give to the residents. (2) Licensing will markup the SIL for licensing issues and give to the residents. 1 (3) The front part of the Restart Assessment Plan will be reviewed to be sure we have inspection processes in place to address these issues. (4) is there a SIL -MC0350 cross reference in place? Answer: Is yes - The SIL for each unit has SIL-MCO350 cross reference. 1 E

            .+                                                                 --
   .                  p

- \ . -< :vmmmaukm.

                                                                                                                         ;T f               i
                                                                                                        *       ' i i

I i i 4i i , . . . . . . ......; - Mm /

WHAT TASKS SHOULD BE DEVELOPED IN ANTICIPATION OF THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING?

Not addressed, except as stated above for Phil McKee to develop a report format for the Commission. 1

ECP (Employee Concerns Program) site coverage - who, when, and how l much (1) Jacque Durr requested that use of the residents for this be minimized j because there is too much else on their agendas l

(2) Who staffs inspection. Unknown at this time. Contract help still being pursued.

Licensing Actions - status and potential problems (1) Not addressed. Will be addressed at the next RAP meeting.
SIL items needir.g NRR staff action (1) See ICAVP item above (2) We still need an inspection plan for the OSTI.

F .h Y F 'M$IA@flitsyl;TEin%%2 bht &k%#9$7MWN5M:M?iMEAN!f6MR l 1(A j , i 1 - e Metrics for programmatic issues in the RAP j (1) Not addressed. Will be addressed at the next RAP meeting.

e

IV. . Miscellaneous items (1) Norm Blumberg will send John Nakoski and Peter Koltay his preliminary workup of a Corrective Action inspection Plan. (Completed on 5/2/97) (2) . The next RAP meeting is tentatively scheduled for June 11 but the meeting may have to be moved up to May 21. 4 l {' l i l l 1 l

m - \ O

   . r F

1 MILLSTONE STATION RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL MEETING MAY 22,1997 ATTENDEES: W. Travers P. Mckee E. Imbro J. Durr T. Easlick D. Beaulieu A. Cerne R. Arrighi L. Scholl S. Reynolds S. Dembek D. Mc Donald J. Andersen J. Nakoski P. Koltay R. Urban OLD BUSINESS: e Approved the meeting minutes from the May 1,1997 meeting. e S. Reynolds presented a "model" commission briefing paper for panel approval. , The panel agreed to the format and individuals were tasked with completing the j sections appropriate to their job functions, inputs will be given to S. Reynolds NO LATER THAN June 10,1997 in preparation for the commission meeting on July 21, 1997. (Note: the commission paper is dir to the commission by July 14th.) W. Travers is to determine the extem to which public interaction is to be included in the commission paper. p e -

,\

1h\\ . l l \ l J ; s e A matrix was presented that identified the common elements of all three units significant items lists, it was proposed to modify the lists to make common elements similar in format for ease of tracking and identification. The panel agreed @ to the matrix content with some exception to the phrasing. Comments will be provided and incorporated. e The panel agreed to place the Generic Letter 89-13 closecut items from the SWSOPl on the Unit 2 Significant items List. PcGas tJND EK.6 F% S $ ' e# i

i

#n

2 NEW BUSINESS:

o

          ,hh                                                                          '
         ~1(A i
                                                                                                                    >    l I

e Panel accepted the nominstion of J. Trapp as the team leader for the OSTI for Unit 2 or 3 whichever is first.

The senior resident inspectors presented a status of the significant items list for each unit.
There was a discussion of what actions the licensee was taking to address specific line items in the MC 0350 process. J. Durr will contact the licensee and verify they are developing packages for appropriate line items.

N.h h e J.Durr will clarify who is doing the operator training and MC 40500 inspections. # e S. Reynolds willidentify the Significant items List issues that require NRR or SPO L action; and E. Imbro will identify issues that will be covered by the ICAVP efforts in whole or in part. These inputs are due before the next RAP meeting, which is currently scheduled for June 25th. e There was a discussion of the pend!ng licer.se amendments and the potential for them to become the critical path for Unit 0 because of the scope and number of issues. P.McKee was acsigned the task of making a recommendation to the director concerning sending a letter to the utility expressing our concern for the lateness of filing and the potential to jeopardize our ability to complete them before restart. The commission paper will include a discussion of the potential for licensing actions to become critical path for restart. T! e The next RAP meeting is tentatively ccheduled for June 25,1997. Agenda items for the next meeting between the NRC and NU should include the following: License amendment status, updates on the "Loftus Model", status of operator licensing corrective actions, status of the 10CFR50.54f responses,

                                   , status of their employee concerns program ( what are they doing/seeing regarding the safety culture), and results of self assessments.

l __

v' ~ : J '* 3 The panel discussed the possible role of NU in the public meeting process as an interested party, but not up front with the NRC. They would be there to answer questions that directly related to their activities and would provide their perspective. W. Travers has discussed this briefly with 8, Kenyon. .l. Durr will meet with P. Loftus to discuss NU's involvement at the next NRC mer, ting with the public. Details of NU's involvement will be developed. e D. Beaulieu will provide a copy of the South Texas restart paper as a possible e model to use for Millstone restart.

                                                                   * - . -                                         1 J

IAT J

                                                             +                                                  l l
                                                                                                                     \

t ! t 4 MILLSTONE RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL .

     .                                       MEETING. MINUTES JULY 2, 1997 ATTENDEES:       W. Travers               W. Lanning               J.Durr S. Reynolds              J. Andersen              A. Cerne S. Jones                 E. Imbro                 T. Easlick L. Scholl                D. Beaulieu              P. Mc Kee S. Dembek'(Telephonically)

New Business: e The panel approved the meeting minutes from the May 22, 1997 Restart Assessment Danel meeting. W e .. 1 "R A3 i M W$Ayd19iNIfMly{Gdff//j?fe/FiejnEf[yrieghp@@igN#QI@pys%y.LigAT4#qiji$$$7@M

                                                                       ..        y     I
                                                                                 -     V,     ,

www e The panel discussed the need for a MC 40500 inspection, the composition and timing. A MC 40500 inspection is currently l set for October 1 through 13, 1997. T. Shedlosky was 1 D (UI'Sh , Q. C f.- lh 4

i designated as the team leader. NRR/HQMB has committed E. Ford and R. Latta; NRR/HHFB has committed one person for the team. The panel agreed that one or more contractors would be l assigned to the team to examine the employees concer'ns aspect. One or two additional inspectors will be needed to complete the complement. e The resident inspectors made presentations on the status of ! the significant Items List for each unit. ; Ye . . . . . . . . . . . . M 1 1 A 1 me l

                                                                                         -m i

w e P. Mc Kee provided an update on the status of employee concerns. He noted that SPO is about to approve the Little Harbor Consultants oversight plan.

                             -On 7/7/97, we should receive contractor support to monitor LHC.
                             -Plan to inspect employee concern during the MC 40500 team inspection.
                             -LHC will participate in public meetings.
                                                                                        "           I f

a 61. 9 .a a sw m m n .sg m m m e n g g m m u n m g w w e l ' 1

hk

  , . ..                                                                      1 c.
 .                                                                            i e    Discussed the policy for public meetings. Working meetings between the NRC and the utility will be conducted during normal working hours, and where possible at the site. Public meetings will be held at night.

l l e The next RAP meeting will be held on August 21, 1997. The next NRC/ licensee meeting will be held on August 20, 1997 and the topics for discussion are: Follow up discussion of the MS 3 spent fuel I pool cooling event. I Results,of FPI survey.

Follow up discussion of the training issues. What are the current challenges to each unit?

What are the significant changes since the lasi meeting? Results of the quality assurance audit. Current performance indicators. Old Business: e The panel decided there was a need to issue the updated version of the Restart Assessment Plan before the next commission meeting on August 6, 1997. The update will include the recent revisions made to make common items similar across all three units, updated status of SIL items, and any appropriate comments from the panel. The current revision will be issued to the panel again for review and comments. Comments will be provided to J. Durr not'later than July 10 and the update issued on July 15. l l l l

a . , 1 i Millstone Restart Assessment Panel Meeting Minutes For { Meeting Conducted on Wednesday August 13,1997 , l 1. Attendees: l l

Bill Travers
Tony Cerne e Paul Narbut

e Wayne Lanning

Beth Korona
Steve Reynolds
Phil McKee
Dave Beaulieu o Steve Dembeck
Gene Imbro e Steve Jones e Norman Blumberg e Jacque Durr e Harold Eichenholtz By Telephone:

I

Larry Scholl ll. Sll Status: l l' i Unit 3: j 86 SIL ltems, of which,25 have been closed There are 214 packages,of which,100 have been given to the NRC for closure. The licensee is 50 packages behind their schedule.

Unit 2: 51 SIL items, of which,2 have been closed. 8 Silitems do not require packages to close. Status of packages is currently unclear. Unit 1: No status given. Unit 1 residents were not present at the meeting. Ill. Enforcement Status: m ,.l A .........,..y. .

-{

P- z_ I i I

u a.

I i d hv i kg - gA3

                                                                                                      =d L

IV. OSTI Status and Mannina: (1) Currently Scheduled Milestones: e 10/13/97 Start of Unit 3 modified OSTI e 11/22/97 Unit 3 goes to Mode 4 (hot shutdom? e 11/22/97 Licensee submits 50.54 (f) completion letter for Unit 3 e 12/19/97 End of NRC Unit 3 ICAVP inspection effort l (2) General Discussion Concerning the OSTl: e We need to find people for the OSTl. Regional support should be coordinated through the Deputy RA. We also need to fix a date. The OSTI could be rescheduled to end on 11/24/97 vice earlier date above. e Most of the OSTI will be done when there will be no real operations in l progress. This is probably OK since OSTI will be looking at big ticket i items. The OSTI may have to be two tier with a second smaller group watching plant operations during and after plant heat up.

                                                                                                     'l P                                                                                    ,
      ,h h         i b                               g e g a an w a a m s;g e m,w y m a g gg,ggy w

l s . I j u _ 4

           -                                                                                                  1 t                                                                                                            j

, l V. MC 40500 Corrective Action insoection:

                                                                                              .               i e    OSTI and 40500 will be separate inspections. 40500 will do corrective actions part of the OSTI.

40500 should be done before the OSTI. Tentative start date is 9/29/97.

e 40500 needs to be manned. At least two people from NRC HQ are scheduled to be on the inspection?? VI. Insoection Oversight After Criticalitv: . e

       .h U

Need to obtain Unit 3's power ascension plan.

Vll. Miscellaneous issues: W A -(1) - (2) Commissioner visits to Millstone: i e Commissioners plan visits to Millstone. We need dates. e Chairman plans to visit sometimein November. Can we get date? She will probably hold a press conference. e SPO will talk to the various commissioner staffs as to what is needed in the way of support, scheduling and briefing materials. l e Norm Blumberg to coordinate with Dave Skeen, the EDO assistant for Region 1. I<< "

We need to prepare briefing packages.

e Update Region i Millstone Plant Background Report (PBR) - Blumberg.

Prepare PPR? - Blumberg/Durr (3)
Should Millstone PIMS be made publicly available?

e- -

i (4) Suggestion by Steve Reynolds that public meetings be shortened or split up into two sessions. 4 to 5 hour meetings are too long. 'This will be evaluated. (5) Licensee training and staffing levels will be included as a topic for the next license /NRC meeting. l l l t l

A

m MILLSTONE RES' ART ASSESSMENT PANEL MEETING MINUTES , September 24,1997 Attendees: D. Beaulieu N. Blumberg A. Cerne S. Dembek J. Durr T. Ecslick E. Imbro W. Lanning D. Mc Donald P. Mc Kee S. Reynolds L. Scholl T.' Shedlosky J. Trapp W. Travers 1 Approved the meeting minu,tes from the August 13,1997 RAP meeting. ! Discussed the status of the MC 40500and OSTIinspections. The licensee has delayed " physically ready for restart" which impacts the start of the inspection process. Due to the delay, W. Travers will hold the memorandum to the deputy l regional administrators requesting inspector support.

T. Shediosky will develop a set of criteria for NRC initiation of the MC 40500 inspection by October 6. Consideration will be given to uncoupling the MC 40500 i

inspection from the OSTI to facilitate licensee and agency needs.

The panel agreed that the temporal relationship of the OSTI and MC 40500 1

inspections to the end of the ICAVP corrective action inspections will be maintained. J. Trapp will reissue the draft OSTIinspection plan to the RAP for approval. The OSTI schedule will be designed to capture specific activities and to observe operational mode changes whenever they might occur to optimize team efficiency.

MC 0350 status was presented by the inspection staff.

MS 3 86 total SIL items; 27 are closed; 37 packages are overdue. MS 2 51 total Sllitems; 10 are closed MS 1 108 total SIL items; 1 is closed. The panel agreed that it was acceptable to close a SIL item during the inspection of the item if one or more unresolved issues remained that did not impact the restart criteria for the unit. For example,if the SIL item was a programmatic area and the inspection identified a minor administrative unresolved issue, it is appropriate to close the Sll and track the issue under the open item tracking system. N

P. Mc Kee proposed a SIL item closure plan (attached) as a method for closing items assigned to licensing such as "FSAR adequacy for restart and the 10 CFR

, 50.59 process." l _,

           ~                                          -

E T/ S)i si A l _ h a JJu d cv r , ,/.A

2 ag, a-

w r: 2 l . l < a f I l l \

                                                                  ~ ' ~ ' '

{( -. , I I i E'

                                                                                                              # -[

e The panel discussed the status of the CAL for operctor training. It is not clear what actions are being taken or need to be taken to close the CAL. J. Durr will folloty up with DRS on the plans and remaining actions needed to close the CAL. e The panel determined that, given the licensee's announced delay in the " physically ready for restart date," it would be the opportune time to share the ICAVP corrective actior inspection completion dates with the utility. This is currently the critical path inspection needed to complete the ICAVP inspection phase and is a major milestone that paces many NRC activities. This will be coordinated through the director's office before release. e The panel approved doing an initial ICAVP or.ective action assessment inspection on October 27,1997 to probe the status o, iconsee activities and establish expectations. 43 ' e Similarly, there will be an employees concern program inspection using MC 40001 on October 27,1997 to verify LHC findings and licensee reported status. l-

P. Mc Kee will contact the Human Performance Branch and ascertain if someone with the proper credentials can support the management inspection portion of the MC 40500 inspection, t ,

r . . .

          .                                                                                                              j o

4J ' 3 e The panel discussed the potential overlap in LHC activities and those of the MC 40500 inspection (i.e. the corrective action presentation made by LHC that directly relates to MC 40500). P. Mc Kee will contact LHC and coordinate future activit The panel was briefed of the licensee's powe* ascension program. The licensee currently has a draft plan that outlines their ascent to power operation and ) assessment milestones. N. Blumberg will develop a draft NRC inspection plan for the power ascension phase and provide it to the panel by October 16. l The panel discussed the ICAVP-SSFl inspection findings and their impact on NRR. ! If the findings need NRR staff review and positions, a determination needs to be made if a TIA is warranted to document staff positions versus a verbal. E. Imbro (* . i. i

5 r,

                          ~
                                                                                                                   /

1 .

f e l w A L.__ i t g .i

                  ,                                                                                           1
 .*                                                                                                           1 1
 't WA MILLSTONE RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL MEETING MINUTES December 17,1997 i

Attendees: W. Travers W. Lanning E. Imbro S. Reynolds T. Easlick D. Beaulieu A. Corne P. Cataldo S. Jones B. Korona J. Durr L. Scholl N. Blumberg J. Andersen*

Telephonically Discussed the lack of meeting minutes from the November RAP meeting. Reynolds and Blumberg have notes that can be assembled to capture the essence of the meeting.

Panel members need to develop a late, pacing items list that will enumerate the end l of project major issues that need to be focused on such as VETIP and S&L DDR's. i List listing will be added to the commission briefing paper. Unit 1 has one SIL item complete. The licensee is not providing any packages , ' completed packages at this time. The residents are only performing the core ! inspections, all other effort will be directed to Unit 3. i Unit 2 has 11 of 51 SIL items completed. The programmatic areas are being inspected but not closed. Unit 3 has 29 SIL items closed; 8 more will be closed in inspection report 207.

There are approximately 20 packages in the backlog and another 5-10 will be closed in inspection report 208.

Need to complete the updating of the Restart Assessment Plan. Mc Kee will provide updated input on LAR's and ECP, l

e?.% g Ly A mes w w wwa m & ~ m m ipam0% 9 .. - _f

w. .

                                                                              \
                                                                                             =a-1-

i1tns Lu $ lh Ey. 5 R (A

                                                   ,                                       g

l

\.

t et 2 Similarly, SPO staff needs to develop a listing of the inputs that will be used to close programmatic areas. (Residents) The RAP decided to review and approve the p closure of all programmatic areas of the SIL. d

                    .                                                                                        -p  '

l I ;

>, \

f G>/ *

                         .                                                            - - --   - =

yyj S. Reynolds will keep the (naster schedule for SPO meetings, h }- 4 I

     ~]h <r     U                                                                                         M Next RAP meeting is scheduled for 1/15/98 and the next public meeting is slated for 1/27/98.

46 l . . Unit 3 license amendment requests: 8 are still open, all have been submittc 1 The Arcor seismic issue may need to be submitted as an unresolved safety question, also the auxiliary feedwater throttle valves. Need to draft a " straw man" power authorization paper. Discussed the recent counter proposal of NU for providing responses connected to milestones versus periodic updates for the 10 CFR 50.541etter. P. Mc Kee to draft NRC position. 'd

                                                           *4
                                                               %"                                                  WM

7-. _ 1 a 4 MILLSTONE RESTART ASSESSMENT PANEL MEETING MINUTES January 15,1998 Attendees: T. Eastick S. Reynolds W. Lanning J. Trapp D. Beaulieu P. Mc Kee E. Imbro W. Travers D. Mc Donald J. Shediosky A. Cerne E. Korona J. Nagoski H. Eichenholz J. Durr The panel approved the meeting minutes, as amended, from the December 17,1997 RAP meeting. ,

The panel agreed that the next Plant Performance review for the senior management meeting would be held the week of March 23,1998.

The panel discussed the elements of the restart authorization process for Millstone Unit 3. R. Perch was designated to develop a draft plan based on the precedent set by other plants that have restarted from extended NRC imposed outages.

.         ?

r m 445 b . . . . k_- 2

The licensee has tentatively proposed the date of February 9,1998 as the onsite start date for the MC 40500 team inspection. The licensee stated they will send a letter requesting the inspection on this date. The panel discussed the appropriateness of this date base on the NRC perception of the licensee's progress.

The MC 40500 team leader presented his observations that supported the inspection starting on the proposed date. The panel agreed to starting the inspection on February 9,1998.

                   #m%# +                                    amweemesse                                        l yy                                                                            _

l -

                                                                                         .-.. _ ..    ._,_ q

, -A - r-lon5 tu My d Ey, g A\\S /0 l D l i

                                 -                                         /a          _

a i

 'M 2

The resident inspection staff provided an update of the Significant Items List status. Unit 2: Twelve of the 52 SIL packages have been closed; 30 items are in the licensees process. All NRC backlog packages are being inspected. Unit 3: Thirty eight of the 86 SIL packages are closed as of December. Five of the SIL's will not have packages because they are programmatic issues such as review the Hannon Report or review the enforcement j issues. NNECO owes us 13 SIL packages. Of the remaining 30 packages,9 r,equire inputs from NRR; 14 will be inspected by special ; inspection teams and 7 are within SPO control. l E. Imbro provided a status report on the progress of the ICAVP effort. The NRC has completed tier 2 and 3 for Unit 3. There will be a public exit on 1/28/98. Tier 1 will be onsite for 2 weeks and exit on 2/6/98. The corrective action inspection is scheduled to begin the week of 2/1/98 and end on 3/27/98. It will be 2 weeks onsite, a week off site, and 2 more weeks onsite. It will examine NNECO's corrective actions for deficiency reports. A. Cerne will provide the ICAVP team with selected open items for inspection. P. Mckee discussed the inspection processes that will examine the interface for issues that need to be included in the FSAR. It was decided that the MC 40500 inspection team would examine the FSAR change process. I W.

                                                                                                       ^
                                                                                                                   \

l n 1 8 O c- -

j

0 9* k
eaeh n $ O "8 , ,
4 e g **e i '

                                                                               .                              !      t
                                                                                                                   /

m 1 a l l

I 6 . e 3 The project managers provided a status report on license amendment requests for Units 2 and 3. For Unit 3, there are 6 open LAR's,4 for mode 4 and 2 are near completioii. The instrument inaccuracies needs more information and may challenge the mode change dates. The LAR dealing with the pressurizer level setpoint may need to be revised, there is currently a request for information. Two LAR's are needed for mode 2, the issue on the spent fuel pool boraflex and the shutdown margin monitor.

J We are awaiting the submittal on the Arcor potential USQ. The licensee may deal with this under GL 91-18 while awaiting the license amendment. The licensec just submitted a relief request that they will need prior to mode 4 on base line for the RSS pump. For Unit 2, there are 22 LAR's,11 are complete. Major LAR's are HELB inside containment; control room technical specifications; Appendix R / Thermolag exemptions. l I l l 1 _}}

ML20216F101: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:39, 5 August 2021

Text

Participants:

Navigation menu

ML20216F101: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:39, 5 August 2021

Text

Participants:

Navigation menu

Search