ML20217D360

Staff Requirements Memo on SECY-99-223 Re Millstone Independent Review Team 990312 Rept on Allegations of Discrimination in NRC Ofc of Investigation Cases Nda: 1-96-002,1-96-007 & 1-97-007 & Associated Recommendation 6

ML20217D360
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	10/13/1999
From:	Vietticook A NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:	Travers W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-99-223-C, NUDOCS 9910150129
Download: ML20217D360 (2)

Text

o l

[ 3.......................

8*

/""% f.,

UNITED STATES  : RELEASED TO THE PDR

( g NUCLEAR REGULATOf.Y COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 * *

$

• o c l dato initials i '

October 13, 1999 l

%,***** t.. .....eeseeemsomesced

$ECRETARY MEMORANDUM TO: William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary [

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-99-223 - MILLSTONE l lNDEPENDENT REVIEW TEAM MAROH 12,1999, REPORT ON ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION iN NRC OFFICE OF i INVESTIGATION CASES NDA: 1-96-002,1-96-007, AND 1 007, AND ASSOCIATED LESSONS LEARNED- 1 RECOMMENDATION NO. 6 l l

The Commission has disapproved the staff's recommendation (Option 4) to encourage licensees to document and retain records relevant to any large scale reorganization or i downsizing effort.

The Office cvestigations (01) should consider this matter further as it investigates future )

discriminatwn cases. If Ol believes that licensees are destroying or failing to generate records -

that are necessary for the NRC to determine whether a licensee has disparately treated l whistleblowers,01 should immediately inform the Commission of this matter. In that event, Ol should work with the Office of the General Counsel to determine the legal and policy implications of requiring records to be " documented and retained."

The staff noted that options 2 and 3 would be a backfit pursuant to 10 CFR 50.109. This conclusion is inconsistent with Commission policy and should not prevent the staff from pursuing the issue of records retention. As a policy matter, pure record-keeping and reporting requirements do not need to meet the requirements of the backfit rule to be justified. The backfit rule would require a showing of a "substantialincrease in safety" as a result of the new requirement to be imposed. The test for record keeping is different. Specifically, such rules are subject to the balancing in 10 CFR $ 50.54(f), that "the burden to be imposed on respondents is justified in view of the potential safety significance of the issue to be addressed in the requested information." The Commission recently reiterated this policy in the Statement of Considerations on a final rule amending 10 CFR Part 72 and in the statemont of considerations for the proposed

rules on reporting of reactor events. See 64 Fed Reg 33,178; 33,181 (1999) and 64 Fed Reg l 36291, 36303 ( July 6,1999).

l l

yo=s ' o l

r 9910150129 991013 PDR 10CFR (O bN, (,,An i PT9.7 PDR l x~

L

4y 2 ..

cc:-  : Chairman Dieus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan '

Commissioner Merrifield OGC.-

' CIO .

CFO OCA

. OlG -

OPA-l Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

PDR DCS-1 1

r s

l-t e

"E -

2 1

k - , k

==