ML20151T071

Requests SER Which Summarizes Verbal Agreements as Outlined in 880125 & 0222 Ltrs & Evaluates Technical Adequacy of Gc Andognini to Fj Miraglia

ML20151T071
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	04/20/1988
From:	Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Weiss S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8804280573
Download: ML20151T071 (2)

Text

- _ _ - _

-"* April 20, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Seymour H. Weiss, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: George W. Knighton, Director Pro'ect Directorate V Ditision of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects

SUBJECT:

RANCHO SEC0 REMOTE SHUTDOWN TEST

REFERENCE:

(a) SMUD ltr G. Carl Andognini to F. J. Miraglia dated January 25, 1988 (b) SMUD ltr G. Carl Andognini to F. J. Miraglia dated February 22, 1988 (c) SMUD ltr G. Carl Andognini to F. J. Miraglia dated April 15, 1988 The Rancho Seco remote reactor shutdown test as described in the above referenced letters was submitted by SMUD to describe a restart related test of the remote shutdown panel. The remote shutdot:n panel test was included in the restart program by the NRC staff to ensure that (1) restart hardware modifications affecting the remote shutdown panel did not adversely impact the ability to maintain the plant in a shutdown condition from outside the control room and (2) plant operators were versed in perfoming remote shutdowns.

As outlined in reference (a), the license required tests of the remote shutdown panel have been completed. The staff proposed restart related shutdown panel test was discussed with cognizant members of your staff and their contractor.

During the discussions it was concluded that the test scope as described by SMUD in references (a) and (b) was acceptable to the staff. Reference (c) includes the test procedure. Please provide a SER which 1) sumarizes our verbal agreements as outlined in references (a) and (b)(, and (2) evaluates the technical adequacy of reference (c).

original signed by George Knighton George W. Knighton, Director Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects I

DISTRIBUTION Docket m e NRC & LPDR GMHolahan GKalman

'PDV Reading DMCrutchfield JLee

/ L_

0FC : UMP /FDV :DR5153 PDV NAME :GKalman:cw :GW(WQhton e804280573 080420 DATE :4/D /88: :4p/88 ADOCK 050 2

{DR Uti it, A AL ht(UMU LUPT i - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l .

'3m arrg,

' UNITED STATES "o,,

! o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{ WASm NGTON, D. C, 20E46

%, * . . . . .o April 20, 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR: Seymour H. Weiss, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Nuclear Reactor Regulation FRCH: George W. Knighton, Director Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects

SUBJECT:

RANCHO SECO REMOTE SHUTDOWN TEST

REFERENCE:

(a) SMUD ltr G. Carl Andognini to F. J. Miraglia dated January 25, 1988 (b) SMUD ltr G. Carl Andognini to F. J. Miraglia dated February 22, 1988 (c) SMUD ltr G. Carl Andognini to F. J. Miraglia dated April 15, 1988 The Rancho Seco remote reactor shutdown test as described in the above referenced letters was submitted by SMUD to describe a restart related test of the remote shutdown panel. The remote r,hutdown panel test was included in the restart program by the NRC staff to ensure that (1) restart hardware modifications affecting the remote shutdown panel did not adversely impact the ability to maintain the plant in a shutdown condition from outside the control room and (2) plant operators were versed in performing remote shutdowns.

As outlined in reference (a), the license required tests of the remote shutdown panel have been completed. The staff proposed restart related shutdown panel test was discussed with cognizant members of your staff and their contractor.

During the discussions it was cor.cluded that the test scope as described by SMUD in references (a) and (b) was acceptable to the staff. Reference (c) includes l

the test procedure. Please provide a SER which (1) sumarizes our verbal agreements as outlined in references (a) and (b), and (2) evaluates the technical adequacy of reference (c).

I George . Knighton frector l

Project Directorate Y Division of Reactor Projects - III, l

IV, Y and Special Projects l

l l

l